Illustration — no photo of this home on file yet
Joy Senior Center
Mid-size home·Licensed for 18·Brentwood, California
- Care approvals on fileWheelchair · Dementia · Hospice · BedriddenState licensing record · September 13, 2026
- Typical starting rate$5,000 a monthTypical in Alameda County · likely $3,350–$7,400
- Home sizeLicensed for 18Mid-size care home · a licensed care home (RCFE)
- Room at the last state visit16 of 0 beds occupiedApril 15, 2025 · not a current opening
- Ways to payAsk the homeMedi-Cal ALW participation not on file
- Last state visitMay 31, 2024CDSS inspection record
- Licence holderBdsj Holdings LLCSince 2018 · 2 licensed homes
Joy Senior Center is a mid-size care home in Brentwood — a licensed residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE), the licence category behind “assisted living” and “board and care.” It is licensed for 18 residents since 2018.
Built from CDSS public records · September 13, 2026. Every fact below names its source and date.
Quick answers and the state record
A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.
Quick answers about Joy Senior Center
Is Joy Senior Center licensed?
The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
How many residents is Joy Senior Center licensed for?
18 residents — a mid-size home, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
Has Joy Senior Center been cited?
2 Type A and 0 Type B citations since 2018, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. Those records count 16 state visits over the same years.
Is Joy Senior Center still open?
This license was on the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
What does Joy Senior Center cost?
$5,000 a month to start is typical in Alameda County, likely $3,350–$7,400. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”
Too few nearby homes publish a rate, so this is the typical starting rate 14 homes with 7 to 49 beds publish in Alameda County, with a wider likely range. This home’s own rate is not on file.
Among 34 other homes of a similar licensed size across Alameda County that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $3,000 to $5,735 a month, and the middle figure is $4,500 (n = 34 other homes publishing a starting rate).
Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.
A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.
The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.
A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.
Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
Does Joy Senior Center take Medi-Cal?
On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: we have not yet confirmed that an entry on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver list is this home’s. Ask the home: “Do you take the Medi-Cal Assisted Living Waiver?” The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
Who holds the license?
The license is held by Bdsj Holdings LLC, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. See the homes licensed to Bdsj Holdings LLC — at least 2 on the state roster.
Can Joy Senior Center keep a resident on hospice?
Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 6 residents, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
Joy Senior Center license and inspection record
- Name on the license: “JOY SENIOR CENTER”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
- License #19200734. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
- Licensed for 18 residents — a mid-size home, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
- Licensed to Bdsj Holdings LLC, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
- First licensed in 2018, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
- 16 state inspection visits since 2018, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
- 2 Type A and 0 Type B citations on file since 2018, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. The same records count 16 state visits in that period.
- 5 complaints and 2 substantiated allegations on file since 2018, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
- The most recent state visit on file is May 31, 2024, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗
Can they support the care needed?
California licenses a home for specific kinds of care. The state’s record lists what this home is approved for; the home’s own answers fill in what changes as needs change.
- Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved · covers up to 18 residents
- Dementia / memory careApproved by the state
- Hospice careApproved · covers up to 6 residents
- BedriddenApproved · covers up to 6 residents
State licensing record · September 13, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.
Read the state’s own wording
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 18 NON-AMBULATORY OF WHICH 6 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 6.
983 - RCFE / DEMENTIA
CDSS record, verbatim · September 13, 2026
As needs change
- Staying through hospice
Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 6 — care may continue at the end of life
Ask: “If hospice is needed, can care continue here until the end?”
State licensing record · September 13, 2026
- If memory loss develops
Dementia-care designation on file
Ask: “Can we read the dementia care disclosure and discuss how daily support works?”
State licensing record · September 13, 2026
3 more questions to ask the home
- Two-person transfers or a lift
Not on file
Ask: “If two people or a lift are needed to transfer, can the person stay?”
- Someone awake overnight
Not on file
Ask: “Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?”
- Medicines
Not on file
Ask: “Who manages the medicines, and what happens when a dose is missed?”
What it costs here
Typical starting rate
$5,000a month to start
Likely $3,350–$7,400
From homes this size in Alameda County · this home’s rate is not on file
Likely monthly total
$5,000a month
Likely $3,350–$7,500
With a shared room and basic help.
An estimate for planning, not a quote. The price is made in the phone call.
See the full cost breakdownRoom, care and fees · how people pay · how this estimate works
Starting monthly rate$5,000likely $3,350–$7,400
Too few nearby homes publish a rate, so this is the typical starting rate 14 homes with 7 to 49 beds publish in Alameda County, with a wider likely range. This home’s own rate is not on file.
Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600
Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (45 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).
One-time move-in fee$2,000one time · likely $0–$4,000
Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,000 (134 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.
- Likely monthly totalLikely $3,350–$7,500
- $5,000
- First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $4,400–$10,200
- $7,000
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
- Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
- Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverWe have not yet confirmed that an entry on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver list is this home’s. Ask the home: “Do you take the Medi-Cal Assisted Living Waiver?” The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
- SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
- VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
- Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
- MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
- The care level
Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.
- What is billed separately
Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.
- Move-in costs
A one-time community fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.
- Increases
California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.
- What is the full monthly cost for the room and care we need, and what does it include?
- What would the next care level cost, and who decides when it changes?
- What is billed separately, and is there a one-time fee or deposit at move-in?
- Is any private-pay period required before another payment program can begin?
How this estimate worksWhy this is a county figure
Too few nearby homes publish a rate, so this is the typical starting rate 14 homes with 7 to 49 beds publish in Alameda County, with a wider likely range. This home’s own rate is not on file.
- Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
- Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
- Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
- Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
- We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
- It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Where it is
- 6400 Brentwood Blvd, Brentwood, CA 94513Address from the public record · September 13, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.
A map position is not on file for this address.
The state record
California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. Here are the dated documents and the state’s own words, beside what is typical for homes this size.
Since 2022, the state has filed 15 documents for this home, and its records count 16 visits since 2018. The most recent — a complaint investigation report on April 15, 2025 — closed with the state’s outcome word: “Substantiated.”
- On file since
- 2022
- State visits
- 16
- Most recent visit
- May 31, 2024
- Occupied · April 15, 2025 visit
- 16 of 0 bedsa count on that day, not an opening
We hold 5 complaint reports the state published for this home, dated June 15, 2022 to April 15, 2025. 5 of the 5 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (2), “Unsubstantiated” (3). 5 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word. Summary composed by computer from the 5 complaint reports below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.
Beside homes the same size
- Type A citations2typical 0
- Type B citations0typical 1
- Substantiated allegations2typical 2
- Total complaints5typical 6
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,354 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this licence since 2018.
Year by year
The last 36 months — 6 of 15 documents
Apr 15, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Resident sustained an unexplained fracture while in care
On 04/15/25 at 2PM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) D Panlilio conducted a subsequent visit and met with staff (S1) and spoke with administrator (ADM) on the phone who authorized S1 to act on his behalf and sign the reports. LPA explained the purpose of the visit with staff and delivered investigation findings. During investigation, the department obtained the following documents from administrator – R1’s admission agreement, physician's report, Needs/Services plan, appraisals, incident reports, hospital visit discharge reports, visitor logs (Mar, Apr, May 2024) Level of care notes & ADL schedules. Health & safety check conducted see LIC 809 dated 05/23/24. Continued on next page, LIC 9099-C Substantiated Allegation: Resident sustained an unexplained fracture while in care Investigation Finding: Substantiated During investigation, the department conducted interviews of residents (R1, R2, R3), facility staff (ED, S1, S2) & R1’s responsible party (POA) and reviewed resident (R1) documents. Review of R1’s records showed she was first admitted at the facility on 03/08/24 and resided at the facility for a couple of months. R1 was assessed as having dementia, ambulatory with a walker, needs assistance transferring in & out of bed, dressing and a high risk for falls. On 04/14/24, R1 was diagnosed with a displaced fracture of the left wrist. R1 stated that she hurt her left wrist at the facility when she fell out of bed. Staff (S1, S2) stated R1 had three falls at the facility (2 unwitnessed falls at night and one unwitnessed fall in the daytime) while at the facility. S2 stated that he found R1 on the floor on 2 separate occasions. R1 did not complain of any pain and helped her get back to bed. S2 confirmed that there were no fall precautions in place after R1’s repeated falls and that her repeated falls were not documented. Based on the department’s observations and interviews which were conducted and record review(s), the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation(s) that resident sustained an unexplained fracture while in care was found to be substantiated. Immediate civil penalty of $500 assessed during visit for staff failing to provide adequate care and supervision to resident resulting in hospitalization and sustaining unexplained injuries while in care. Additional civil penalty determination is pending relating to resident’s serious bodily injury. Deficiency is cited per Title 22 California Code of Regulations and listed on LIC9099D. Failure to submit proof of corrections (POC) by plan of correction due dates and/or any repeat deficiencies within a 12-month period may result in civil penalties. Exit interview conducted, appeal rights and copy of report provided. Allegation: Resident sustained unexplained injuries while in care Investigation Finding: Unsubstantiated During investigation, the department conducted interviews of residents (R1, R2, R3), facility staff (ED, S1, S2, S3) & R1’s responsible party (POA) and reviewed resident (R1) documents. S1 and R2 denied hitting R1. Staff (ED, S1, S2) confirmed that R1 sustained unexplained injuries while at the facility. S3 stated that on 05/21/24 at around 0710 AM she observed R1’s face was bruised with her lip slightly bleeding. S3 observed R1 sitting in her chair instead of sleeping on her bed while R1’s roommate (R2) was sleeping in R1’s bed instead. S3 stated that she asked R1 what happened and R1 stated that R2 hit her. Staff notified R1’s POA about the incident. Later at breakfast, S3 stated that R1 changed her story and said that staff (S1) hit her instead of R2. Although the allegation may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred. Therefore, the allegation that resident sustained unexplained injuries while in care is unsubstantiated. Allegation: Staff did not ensure resident’s diapering needs are being met in a timely manner Investigation Finding: Unsubstantiated During investigation, the department conducted interviews of facility staff & responsible parties and reviewed resident (R1) documents. Review of R1’s bowel movement/pee records dated 03/10/24 until 05/28/24 showed staff assisted R1 with her toileting needs and changed her diapers frequently (3 to 6 times per day). Staff (ED, S1, S2) stated that they showered, changed residents’ diapers/clothes based on their preferred daily and weekly personal hygiene schedules which they recorded each month. Although the allegation may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred. Therefore, the allegation that staff did not ensure resident’s diapering needs are being met in a timely manner is unsubstantiated. Continued on next page, LIC 9099-C pg3 Allegation: Staff does not ensure resident’s showering needs are being met Investigation Finding: Unsubstantiated During investigation, the department conducted interviews of facility staff & responsible parties and reviewed resident (R1) documents. Review of R1’s monthly shower schedules dated 03/10/24 until 05/28/24 showed that staff gave R1 showers according to family schedules on 03/10, 03/11, 03/15, 03/16, 03/19, 03/23, 03/26, 03/27, 03/31, 04/01, 04/09, 04/09, 04/14, 04/23, 04/24, 04/29 and every Monday, Wednesday and Friday for the whole month of May 2024. Although the allegation may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred. Therefore, the allegation that staff did not ensure resident’s showering needs are being met is unsubstantiated. Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 15, 2025 · control 15-AS-20240520131013
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87468.2(a)(4) · Plan of correction due date: Apr 18, 2025
Residents in privately operated residential care facilities for the elderly shall have all of the following personal rights: To care, supervision, and services that meet their individual needs and are delivered by staff that are sufficient in numbers, qualifications, and competency to meet their needs… This requirement was not met as evidenced by staff failing to provide adequate care & supervision which posed an immediate health & safety risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 15, 2025
Plan of correction: By POC due date, administrator agreed to complete and submit in-service staff retraining certifications by an approved CCL vendor on personal rights of residents in compliance with Section 87468.2 (a)(4). Immediate civil penalty of $500 assessed during visit for serious bodily injury. Additional civil penalty determination pending relating to serious bodily injury.
May 31, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Other
On 5/31/2024 at 09:30AM, Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) J. Clancy-Czuleger and T. Syess- Gibson conducted an unannounced Case Management visit to follow-up on the accusation document that was provided to the facility. LPA met with Rose Constantino, Caregiver and explained the purpose of the visit. Licensee Gurpreet "Bobby" Matharu, was called and agreed to have Rose sign off on the report. LPA toured facility with Caregiver, Rose Constantino and observed the facility posted written notice regarding the accusation. LPA confirm that all fourteen (14) residents have received written. During visit LPA obtained the notice that was posted in the facility and the notice that was sent to the residents or their responsible party. Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 31, 2024
May 31, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Deficiencies
On 5/31/2024 at 09:30AM, Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) J. Clancy-Czuleger and T. Syess- Gibson were at the facility for a Case Management LPAs observed that the back emergency exit pathway was blocked by two bedframes. The Facility was cited, and citations can be found on the LIC 809-D. Exit interview conducted. Appeal Rights and a copy of this report provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 31, 2024
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87307(d)(6) · Plan of correction due date: Jun 3, 2024
All outdoor and indoor passageways and stairways shall be kept free of obstruction. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on observation the licensee did not comply with the section cited above by having bedframes blocking the emergency exit passageway from the back door which poses/posed a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 31, 2024
Plan of correction: The facility agrees to remove the bedframes from the passageway. Proof of correction will be sent to CCLD by POC date.
May 28, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff inappropriately touched resident
On 5/28/2024 at 9:30 AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) James Sampair arrived unannounced to deliver findings on the allegation above. The LPA informed Caregiver Rose Constantino of the purpose of the visit. The Department's investigation included, but was not limited to, a physical inspection of the facility; record reviews of facility, staff, resident documentation, and Brentwood Police Department (BPD) reports; and interviews of the Reporting Party (RP), resident R1, 3 other facility residents, accused staff member S1, and 4 other staff members. Continues on LIC9099-C . . . Unsubstantiated . . . Continued from LIC9099 The complaint alleges that staff inappropriately touched resident R1. The BPD investigated the matter and was unable to find any witnesses or physical evidence to prove that abuse occurred. Therefore, the BPD inspection was closed with a finding of unfounded. The Department’s interviews of the 4 staff members who were not accused of inappropriately touching R1 revealed significant inconsistencies in R1’s statements to them about the alleged inappropriate touch by S1. Physical inspection of the facility, reviews of records, and interviews of 3 of the other residents revealed no witnesses or physical evidence to show that R1 had been inappropriately touched by staff member S1. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 28, 2024 · control 15-AS-20230719141352
May 23, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Health Checks
On 05/23/24 at 01:30PM, Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) D Panlilio and T Syess- Gibson conducted an unannounced Health and Safety check due to the department receiving a priority 1 complaint. During the health and safety check, LPA observed a total of 7 staff members and 15 residents at the facility. LPA toured facility with administrator (ADM), including but not limited to bedrooms, kitchen, bathroom, and common areas. Residents in care appear to be safe and there are no imminent health/safety concerns on today's date. No deficiencies cited during the health and safety check. Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 23, 2024
Mar 29, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
On 03/29/2024 at 12:05PM, Licensing Program Analysts LPAs T.Syess-Gibson and L. Hall conducted an unannounced Annual 1-year required inspection. Caregiver Meledel Sumaylo contacted the Administrator by phone. LPAs toured the facility with caregiver Inoke Moa. Administrator, Gurpreet Matharu arrived at 2:00PM. The administrator currently holds a certificate (#6041833740) that expires on 08/15/2024. The facility’s fire clearance was approved for twelve (12) Non ambulatory and six (6) Bedridden residents. LPA toured the facility including but not limited to bedrooms, bathrooms, kitchen, common area and backyard. The facility consists of eleven (11) total bedrooms which Ten (10) bedrooms are occupied by the residents. There are no bodies of water observed. LPA observed lighting in all rooms are adequate for the comfort and safety of the residents. A comfortable temperature is maintained at 75 degrees Fahrenheit. LPAs observed lighting in all rooms are adequate for the comfort and safety of the residents. The hot water temperature in the residents’ shared bathroom was measured at 119.5 degrees Fahrenheit. Night lights are maintained in hallways and passages to nonprivate bathrooms. Residents’ bathrooms are equipped with grab bars no non slip mats observed. Smoke detectors and carbon monoxide were in operating condition during visit. Fire extinguisher was last serviced on 09/08/2023. Emergency Disaster Plan was last posted on 11/18/2023. First aid kit was observed to be complete. Fire drill was last conducted on 11/03/2023. Continued on LIC809C. Continued from LIC809 The following deficiencies were observed: At 12:30 PM LPAs observed all three (3) of the shared bathrooms did not have non skid mats. At 12:32PM LPAs observed four (4) walkers, two(2) Wheel Chairs and one(1) Hoyer Lift located in the hallway blocking passageway. At 12:36PM LPAs observed beds did not have mattress pads. At 12:45PM LPAs observed there wasn't a Supplies of nonperishable foods for a minimum of one week and perishable foods for a minimum of two days. At 12:50PM LPAs observed refrigerator unsanitary. At 12:55PM LPAs observed garbage inside of a grocery store basket on the side of the facility . At 12:56 PM LPAs observed wooden planks from broken fence on ground obstructing walk path. At 12:58PM LPAs observed Washer and Dryer on side of the facility blocking room number 2 exit. At 2:25PM LPAs observed unlocked medicine cabinet containing resident medication. At 4:45PM LPAs observed Medicine Administration Record was inaccurate. Six (6) residents records were reviewed, current, and complete. Six (6) staff records were reviewed. LPAs also reviewed a sample of medication. Updated copies of the following documents were requested for facility file and are to be submitted to CCLD by 04/05/2024: LIC 308 Designation of Administrative Responsibility LIC 309 Administrative Organization LIC 500 Personnel Report Continued on LIC809C. Continued from LIC809C LIC 610E Emergency Disaster Plan (last page) Residents roster Updated facility sketch Liability Insurance Deficiencies cited per Title 22 California Code of Regulations and listed on LIC809D. Failure to submit proof of corrections (POC) by plan of correction due date and/or any repeat deficiencies within a 12-month period may result in civil penalties. Exit interview conducted. A copy the appeal rights and a copy of this report provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 29, 2024
What the state’s words mean
CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗
Who holds the licence
Bdsj Holdings LLC, licensed since 2018, operates 2 licensed homes in California. Running more than one home is common and is neither good nor bad on its own.
- Joy Senior Center · Brentwood
Life here
Rooms, meals, the rhythm of a day, faith and language, pets and house rules — as the home describes them. Tap any detail for its source and date; nothing here is graded.
The home has not described daily life anywhere we have reviewed yet — that is the case for most small homes, and it says nothing about the home. These questions fill in the picture; keep the ones that matter to you.
Before you call
Ask every home the same questions — the state’s record does not answer these. Keep the ones that matter and they travel with your saved homes.
- What is included in the monthly rate, and what costs extra?
- Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?
- Which rooms does the non-ambulatory approval cover, and what transfer support is provided?
- What could change whether someone can stay here?
- Can we see a bedroom and share a meal during a visit?
Other homes nearby
Licensed homes in Alameda County. This home has no map location on the state record, so these are not ordered by distance. Every listed home appears on the same terms.
1440 by the Bay
Emeryville · Large community
$4,500 a month to start · Listed by the home
A & P Care Home for Seniors
Fremont · Small home
$3,600 a month to start · Covelight estimate
A - R Residential Care Home for Elderly #2
Union City · Small home
$3,300 a month to start · Covelight estimate
A and M Board&Care, Innovative Assis.Home for Elder
Union City · Small home
$3,400 a month to start · Covelight estimate
A Hananiah Place of Dublin
Dublin · Small home
$5,750 a month to start · Covelight estimate
A Home of Our Own
Livermore · Small home
$4,550 a month to start · Covelight estimate