Illustration — no photo of this home on file yet

Emerald Home Care

Small home·Licensed for 6·Dublin, California

Licensed since 2005Licence #15601128
  • Care approvals on fileWheelchair · HospiceState licensing record · September 13, 2026
  • Estimated starting rate$4,600 a monthCovelight estimate · likely $3,750–$5,700
  • Home sizeLicensed for 6Small care home · a licensed care home (RCFE)
  • Room at the last state visit4 of 6 beds occupiedAugust 10, 2022 · not a current opening
  • Ways to payAsk the homeMedi-Cal ALW participation not on file
  • Last state visitApril 24, 2026CDSS inspection record

Emerald Home Care is a small care home in Dublin — a licensed residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE), the licence category behind “assisted living” and “board and care.” It is licensed for 6 residents since 2005. Dementia care and bedridden care are not on file.

Built from CDSS public records · September 13, 2026. Every fact below names its source and date.

Quick answers and the state record

A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

Quick answers about Emerald Home Care

Is Emerald Home Care licensed?

The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

How many residents is Emerald Home Care licensed for?

6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

Has Emerald Home Care been cited?

0 Type A and 1 Type B citation since 2005, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. Those records count 9 state visits over the same years.

Is Emerald Home Care still open?

This license was on the CDSS roster as of September 28, 2026.

What does Emerald Home Care cost?

$4,600 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $3,750–$5,700. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 16 small homes and similar homes within 10 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

Among 34 other homes of a similar licensed size across Alameda County that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $3,000 to $5,735 a month, and the middle figure is $4,500 (n = 34 other homes publishing a starting rate).

Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.

A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.

The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.

A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.

Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.

Does Emerald Home Care take Medi-Cal?

On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.

Who holds the license?

The license is held by Emerald Home Care, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

Is there a hospital nearby?

Stanford Health Care Tri-Valley is 2.8 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.

Can Emerald Home Care keep a resident on hospice?

Hospice care is approved on this license, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

Emerald Home Care license and inspection record

  • Name on the license: “EMERALD HOME CARE”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
  • License #15601128. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • Licensed for 6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • Licensed to Emerald Home Care, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • First licensed in 2005, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • 9 state inspection visits since 2005, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • 0 Type A and 1 Type B citation on file since 2005, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. The same records count 9 state visits in that period.
  • 2 complaints and 1 substantiated allegation on file since 2005, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
  • The most recent state visit on file is April 24, 2026, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
Type A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗

See the state’s own record

Can they support the care needed?

California licenses a home for specific kinds of care. The state’s record lists what this home is approved for; the home’s own answers fill in what changes as needs change.

  • Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved by the state
  • Dementia / memory careNot on file · ask the home
  • Hospice careApproved by the state
  • BedriddenNot on file · ask the home

State licensing record · September 13, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.

Read the state’s own wording
AGE RANGE 60 AND OLDER. ONLY FIVE (5) RESIDENTS MAY BE NON-AMBULATORY.LICENSE IS SUBJECT TO THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE HOSPICE WAIVER WHICH INCLUDES A MAXIMUM OF TWO (2) HOSPICE RESIDENTS AT ANY ONE TIME.

935 - ELDERLY

CDSS record, verbatim · September 13, 2026

As needs change

  • Staying through hospice

    Hospice waiver on file — care may continue at the end of life

    Ask: “If hospice is needed, can care continue here until the end?”

    State licensing record · September 13, 2026

4 more questions to ask the home
  • Two-person transfers or a lift

    Not on file

    Ask: “If two people or a lift are needed to transfer, can the person stay?”

  • Someone awake overnight

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?”

  • Medicines

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who manages the medicines, and what happens when a dose is missed?”

  • If memory loss develops

    Dementia-care designation not on file

    Ask: “If memory loss develops, what would change — and when would a move be needed?”

Care & day-to-day support

These are the home’s own statements about its day-to-day practice — they are not part of the state licensing record, and the state has not approved or reviewed them.

What it costs here

Covelight estimate

$4,600a month to start

Likely $3,750–$5,700

From 16 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file

Likely monthly total

$4,600a month

Likely $3,750–$5,900

With a shared room and basic help.

An estimate for planning, not a quote. The price is made in the phone call.

See the full cost breakdownRoom, care and fees · how people pay · how this estimate works
Room
Daily care
Sharing the room

Memory care is not priced here: a dementia-care designation is not on file for this home. Ask the home.

  • Starting monthly rate$4,600likely $3,750–$5,700

    Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 16 small homes and similar homes within 10 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

  • Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600

    Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (45 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).

  • One-time move-in fee$2,000one time · likely $0–$4,000

    Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,000 (134 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.

Likely monthly totalLikely $3,750–$5,900
$4,600
First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $4,400–$9,000
$6,600
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
  • Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
  • Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
  • SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
  • VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
  • Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
  • MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
If the money runs out, what Medi-Cal covers
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
  • The care level

    Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.

  • What is billed separately

    Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.

  • Move-in costs

    A one-time community fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.

  • Increases

    California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.

  • What is the full monthly cost for the room and care we need, and what does it include?
  • What would the next care level cost, and who decides when it changes?
  • What is billed separately, and is there a one-time fee or deposit at move-in?
  • Is any private-pay period required before another payment program can begin?
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 16 small homes and similar homes within 10 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

16 homes like this within 10 miles publish starting rates mostly between $4,500–$6,500.

  • Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
  • Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
  • Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
  • Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
  • We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
  • It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Show the 16 nearby homes behind this estimate

Where it is

  • 7314 Emerald Ave., Dublin, CA 94568Address from the public record · September 13, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.

Opening the neighborhood map…

The state record

California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. Here are the dated documents and the state’s own words, beside what is typical for homes this size.

Since 2022, the state has filed 8 documents for this home, and its records count 9 visits since 2005. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated April 24, 2026.

On file since
2022
State visits
9
Most recent visit
April 24, 2026
Occupied · August 10, 2022 visit
4 of 6 bedsa count on that day, not an opening

We hold 2 complaint reports the state published for this home, dated August 10, 2022 to May 13, 2025. 2 of the 2 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (1), “Unsubstantiated” (1). 2 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word. Summary composed by computer from the 2 complaint reports below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

Beside homes the same size

  • Type A citations0typical 0
  • Type B citations1typical 0
  • Substantiated allegations1typical 0
  • Total complaints2typical 0

“Typical” is the statewide median across the 6,808 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this licence since 2005.

Year by year
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated2026110202523020241102022231

The last 36 months — 5 of 8 documents

20261 state visit · 1 document
Apr 24, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

On 04/24/2026 at 9:50 AM AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Ardalan Gharachorloo arrived unannounced to conduct 1-Year Annual Required inspection. LPA met with Bintia Loznianu, Care Staff and explained the purpose of the visit. Administrator Carmen Nica was not available during the visit. LPA called the Administrator to explain the purpose of the visit. Administrator Carmen Nica Authorized care giver Bintia Loznianu to sign the report. LPA toured facility including but not limited to bedrooms, bathrooms, kitchen, common area and backyard. All outdoor and indoor passageways are kept free of obstruction. There are no bodies of water observed. A comfortable temperature is maintained at 73 degrees Fahrenheit. LPA observed lighting in all rooms are adequate for the comfort and safety of the residents. The hot water temperature in the residents’ shared bathroom was measured at 117.5 degrees Fahrenheit. Residents’ bathrooms are equipped with grab bars and non-skid mats. There is a minimum of one week supply of non-perishable and 2 day of perishable foods. Centrally stored medication and sharps were locked and inaccessible to residents. Smoke detectors and carbon monoxide detectors were in operating condition during visit. Fire extinguisher was last serviced on 07/16/2025. Emergency Disaster Plan was last reviewed on 01/03/2026. First aid kit was observed to be complete. Emergency disaster drill was last conducted on 02/02/2026. LPA reviewed 1 resident records and 3 staff records; all were complete. LPA also reviewed a sample of 1 resident’s medications.The following documents were reviewed during the visit: LIC 500 Personnel Report LIC 610E Emergency Disaster Plan, Liability Insurance, and Current Administrator’s Certificate. No deficiencies cited during visit. Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 24, 2026
20252 state visits · 3 documents
May 13, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: -Resident (R1) not provided call equipment/buzzer. -Staff is charging for services not received. -Staff did not follow admission agreement. -Resident (R1) did not receive medication as prescribed. -Staff did not meet resident's (R1) hygiene needs. -Staff did not properly dress a resident (R1) while in care. -Staff made an unauthorized diagnosis of a resident (R1) while in care. -Staff denied visits to resident (R1) while in care.

On this day, May 13, 2025 at 1:25 pm, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Delmundo conducted an unannounced visit to continue the investigation of the above allegations and close the complaint. LPA met with Carmen Nica, licensee, and informed the reason for visit. John Nica, administrator (ADM) arrived at around 2:10 pm. On 11/10/21, LPA conducted inspection and interviewed staff (S1 and S2) and resident (R2). R1’s family member (FM) was also interviewed on 11/08/21. Licensee was also interviewed. R1 had moved out from Emerald Care Home when complaint was received by the Department. LPA obtained copies of R1’s following documents from the facility where R1 moved-in: LIC601 Identification and Emergency Contact Information and LIC602A Physician’s Report facility Staff. On 11/10/21, LPA interviewed witness (W1) and R1. .......continued on 9099C (page 2) Unsubstantiated Page 2 Allegation: Resident (R1) not provided call equipment/buzzer. FM stated R1 was not provided call buzzer/call pendant. The 2 staff interviewed stated R1 had call bell which LPA observed in the vacant room used by R1 when R1 was at the facility. R1 stated she had buzzer. Due to medical diagnosis, LPA was not able to obtain information from another resident (R2). Therefore, the allegation is unsubstantiated. Allegations: · Staff is charging for services not received. · Staff did not follow admission agreement. FM stated the contract states residents would be bathed 2 times per week and that was not adhered to even after the family brought this issue to the licensee, they found R1 lacking proper hygiene with greasy matted hair and dressed in the same blouse 3 days in the same week. Review of Admission Agreement for R1 showed bathing twice a week. LIC602A Physician’s Report showed substantial assistance with bathing and partial to substantial assistance with dressing and grooming. S1 stated residents are given bath on Wednesdays and Saturdays. S1 denied missing giving bath to R1 and stated that she remembers giving R1 a bath 3x in a week, because R1 had an accident. S1 further stated that FM came one time and said something about R1's hair being dirty and that was day after R1 was given the scheduled bathing, so S1 gave R1 a shower that day. S2 stated all residents get a bath Wednesdays and Saturdays but R1 sometimes refused but at the end of the day, R1 still get bathe. She and S1 give bath to R1 because of R1’s medical condition and cannot take care of own bathing needs. R1 stated not remembering how many times staff gave R1 a bath, however, R1 told LPA regarding R1's medical condition. S1 stated R1 loves wearing dress sleep wear and that she changed R1's dress every day. S1 further stated she cleaned and wiped R1’s underarm and body with warm cloth every single day. S2 stated she changes all residents clothes every day. R1 stated that it never happened that R1 wore the same clothing for days. Licensee stated residents are changed everyday when they get up and before they go to bed ...continued 9099C (page 3) Page 3 During inspection, LPA observed R2 wearing clean clothing; however, due to R2’s medical condition, LPA was not able to obtain information regarding the allegations. Therefore, the allegations are unsubstantiated. Allegation: Resident did not receive medication as prescribed. FM stated that licensee, told FM that the Milk of Magnesia had not been stated and gave the FM the medication to administer to R1. Licensee denied the allegation and that she and ADM are the one who administers medications to residents. S1 stated she does know if licensee asked FM to administer the said medication. S2 stated not hearing the licensee asked FM to administer the said medication. R1 stated she does not believe she was taking Milk of Magnesia while at the facility, but list of medications showed R1 has order for this medication. Therefore, the allegation is unsubstantiated. Allegation: Staff did not meet resident's (R1) hygiene needs. FM stated that R1 would be bathe twice a week per contract which facility failed to provide. FM further stated that R1 was lacking proper hygiene with greasy, matted hair. Review of Admission Agreement for R1 showed bathing twice a week. S1 and S2, stated they gave R1 bath two times a week. S1 also stated she R1 a bath 3x a week when R1 had accident while S1 stated R1 sometimes refused but at the end of the day, R1 gets bathe. S1 further stated that when FM came and observed R1’s hair, R1 was given a bathe day prior. Licensee stated residents are given bath 2 to 3 times a week as agreed and given sponge bath on days residents are not scheduled for bathing; however, residents are given bath when they have accidents. R1 was not able to provide information regarding the frequency of bathing provided to R1. Due to R2’s medical diagnosis, LPA was not able to obtain information. Therefore, the allegation is unsubstantiated. Allegation: Staff did not properly dress a resident (R1) while in care. FM stated that R1’s lower half was not dressed for facility’s convenience and instead wrap a pad and blanket around R1’s lower extremities. S1 stated R1 loves wearing pajama. Both S1 and S2 stated they change residents’ clothes every day. Licensee denied the allegation and stated the residents' clothing are changed when they get up and before they are put to bed. ....continued on 9099C (page 4) Page 4 R1 stated care staff has taken good care of her. W1 stated observing R1 has blanket from waist down when she assessed R1, however, W1 was not able to tell if R1 was wearing something from waist down or if R1 was wearing a full dress. Due to R2’s medical diagnosis, LPA was not able to obtain information whether R2 observed R1 not dressed from waist down. Therefore, the allegation is unsubstantiated. Allegation: Staff made an unauthorized diagnosis of a resident (R1) while in care. FM stated the licensee repeatedly described R1 as having dementia. Review of LIC602A did not show R1 has dementia diagnosis. The licensee denied the allegation and stated that she never told the FM that R1 has dementia but mentioned that it could be mild cognitive impairment. S1 and S2 stated not hearing the licensee saying R1 has dementia. Due to R2’s medical diagnosis, LPA was not able to obtain information pertaining to the allegation. Therefore, the allegation is unsubstantiated. Allegation: Staff denied visits to resident (R1) while in care. FM stated that licensee told R1’s family leave R1 there for some time after admission meaning not visiting regularly R1 so R1 would fall into line with the house rules. The licensee …… . S1 and S2 stated R1’s family member came to the facility every day and was allowed to visit R1 and the visitation took place in the backyard. Residents’ visitations were allowed inside the facility after weeks and visitors wore mask. R1 was not able to provide information. Due to R2’s medical diagnosis, LPA was not able to obtain information. Therefore, the allegation is unsubstantiated. Based on interviews, observation and records review, there is not a preponderance of evidence standard to prove that violation occurred. No deficiency cited. Exit interview conducted and copy of this report provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 13, 2025 · control 15-AS-20211105095643
May 13, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Deficiencies

While investigating a complaint (Control # 15-AS-20211105095643), Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Delmundo requested for resident’s (R1) documents to be submitted by 11/12/21. LPA did not receive the requested documents. On 8/14/24, LPA called and requested again for the documents and licensee stated R1’s documents were already in the attic and if she cannot find them in her computer, she will not get to the attic to retrieve the documents. On August 27, 2024, LPA called and left an urgent message on licensee’s voicemail and requested to submit the documents by August 30, 2024. Licensee did not submit the documents. LPA reviewed the documents that were received via fax by the Department's Regional Office for October 2021, November 2021 and December 2021 and didn’t observe any documents for R1 from the facility. On this day, 5/13/25, LPA learned that the staff (S1) is not fingerprinted. LPA asked S1 who stated she started working Monday, May 5, 2025. The above were discussed with Carmen Nica, licensee, and John Nica, administrator (ADM). Deficiencies are cited from Title 22 California Code of Regulations and listed on 809Ds. A $500.00 civil penalty is assessed for S1 who is not fingerprinted and will continue for $100.00/day until corrected. Failure to submit proof of correction by plan of correction due date for the other deficiency may also result in civil penalty. Deficiencies and plan and proof of corrections were discussed. Exit interview conducted. Appeal Rights, LIC421BG Civil Penalty, LIC9098 Proof of Correction form and copy if this report provided to ADM.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 13, 2025

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87355(e)(2) · Plan of correction due date: May 14, 2025

87355 Criminal Record Clearance (e) All individuals subject to a criminal record review ... shall prior to working, residing or volunteering in a licensed facility: (2) Obtain a California clearance or a criminal record exemption as required by the Department.... -This requirement is not met as evidenced by: -Based on interview, and LPA checking of the Department's Guardian Portal, the licensee did not comply with the section in S1 not having fingerprint clearance which posed an immediate safety and/or personal rights risks to person in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 13, 2025

Plan of correction: Licensee accompanied the staff for fingerprinting while LPA was at the facility. Staff will not be allowed to work until fingerprinted and associated. Proof to be submitted by 5/14/25, A $500.00 civil penalty is assessed.

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR87506(a) · Plan of correction due date: May 27, 2025

87506 Resident Records: (a) The licensee shall ensure that a separate, complete, and current record is maintained for each resident in the facility or in a central administrative location readily available to facility staff and to licensing agency staff. -This requirement is not met as evidenced by -Based on interviews, the licensee did not comply with the section above in not providing the requested documents which posed a potential personal rights risk to person in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 13, 2025

Plan of correction: Licensee and administrator to read the Regulations and self-certify compliance. Proof to be submitted by 5/27/25.

Apr 2, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

On 04/02/2025 at 12:05 PM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Ardalan Gharachorloo arrived unannounced to conduct 1-Year Annual Required inspection. LPA met with caregiver, Bintia Loznianu and explained the purpose of the visit. Facility Manager, Carmen Nica arrived at 12:35 PM. LPA explained the purpose of the visit to the facility manager. At 12:10 PM, LPA toured the facility including but not limited to bedrooms, bathrooms, kitchen, common area and backyard. All outdoor and indoor passageways are kept free of obstruction. There are no bodies of water observed. A comfortable temperature is maintained at 72 degrees Fahrenheit. LPA observed lighting in all rooms are adequate for the comfort and safety of the residents. The hot water temperature in the residents’ shared bathroom was measured at 109 degrees Fahrenheit. Residents’ bathrooms are equipped with grab bars and non-skid mats. There is a minimum of one week supply of non-perishable and 2 day of perishable foods. Centrally stored medication and sharps were locked and inaccessible to residents. Smoke detectors and carbon monoxide detectors were in operating condition during visit. Fire extinguisher was last serviced on 07/01/2024. Emergency Disaster Plan was last posted on 07/21/2017. First aid kit was observed to be complete. Emergency disaster drill was last conducted on 02/10/2025. At 1:10 PM, LPA reviewed 3 residents records and 3 staff records; all were complete. LPA also reviewed a sample of resident’s medications. The following documents were observed during the inspection: LIC 500 Personnel Report, LIC 610E Emergency Disaster Plan, and Liability Insurance. The current Administrator’s Certificate expires on 10/26/2026. No deficiencies cited during visit. Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 2, 2025
20241 state visit · 1 document
May 21, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

On 5/21/2024 at 2:00PM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) G. Luk arrived unannounced to conduct a Required - 1 Year inspection. LPA met with caregiver, Merlene Sulph and explained the purpose of the visit. Manager, Carmen Nica arrived an hour later, but was unable to stay until the end of inspection. The facility’s fire clearance was approved for 1 ambulatory and 5 non-ambulatory residents of which 2 residents maybe under hospice care. LPA toured the facility including but not limited to bedrooms, bathrooms, dining area, kitchen, garage, and outdoor area. Smoke and carbon monoxide combination detectors were observed. Fire extinguisher was observed to be full. One week of nonperishable and 2-day of perishable food supplies were available. Hot water temperature was measured at 111.6 degrees F in the hallway bathroom. LPA observed grab bars and non-skid mat in the bathrooms. There were adequate lights in each room. Resident rooms were observed to be cleaned and fully furnished. Last fire drill was conducted on 3/15/2024. LPA reviewed resident and 3 staff files starting at 2:50PM. LPA reviewed a sample of resident's medications during inspection. LPA interviewed resident and staff starting at around 5:15PM. At 2:20PM, LPA observed unlocked cleaning supplies in the staff room, unlocked knives in the kitchen, and unlocked gardening tools in the backyard. Staff locked up the cleaning supplies, knives, and gardening tools during inspection. At 2:30PM, LPA observed unlocked medications in the staff room, refrigerator, and kitchen drawer. Staff locked up the medications during inspection. (Continue on LIC809C...) At 3:00PM, LPA observed R1 does not have a current medical assessment and appraisal needs & service plan on file. At 5:30PM, LPA was informed that staff does not document resident's changes in condition. LPA did not observe facility notes or care notes for resident. The deficiencies were observed (see LIC 809D) and cited from the California Code of Regulations, Title 22. Failure to correct deficiencies may result in civil penalties. Exit interview conducted with Merlene Sulph. A copy of this report and appeal rights was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 21, 2024

The state marks this report as 8 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 4. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedthere was not enough evidence to prove a violation occurred — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe evidence showed the allegation was false, could not have happened, or had no reasonable basisType A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗

An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents and the questions below stand in their place.

Life here

Rooms, meals, the rhythm of a day, faith and language, pets and house rules — as the home describes them. Tap any detail for its source and date; nothing here is graded.

Find a detail about life at this home.

Rooms & the spaces they will use

Meals, preferences & familiar food

Activities & the rhythm of a day

  • Activity types offeredActivities On-site

    Reported on aplaceformom.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Trips outside the home

    Reported on aplaceformom.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Religious services at the home

    Reported on aplaceformom.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Religious services off site

    Reported on aplaceformom.com · seen September 9, 2026.

Faith, culture & language

  • Religious observance supportedChristian Services

    Reported on aplaceformom.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Languages spoken by caregiversRomanian

    Reported on aplaceformom.com · seen September 9, 2026.

Visiting & staying involved

  • Public transit access claimed

    Reported on aplaceformom.com · seen September 9, 2026.

Before you call

Ask every home the same questions — the state’s record does not answer these. Keep the ones that matter and they travel with your saved homes.

  1. What is included in the monthly rate, and what costs extra?
  2. Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?
  3. Which rooms does the non-ambulatory approval cover, and what transfer support is provided?
  4. What could change whether someone can stay here?
  5. Can we see a bedroom and share a meal during a visit?

Other homes nearby

The nearest licensed homes in Alameda County, closest first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.

Explore Alameda County