Illustration — no photo of this home on file yet

Milan Villa Senior Living

Mid-size home·Licensed for 24·Livermore, California

Licensed since 2020Licence #19201003Medi-Cal ALW
  • Care approvals on fileWheelchair · Dementia · HospiceState licensing record · September 13, 2026
  • Starting rate$5,000 a monthListed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026
  • Home sizeLicensed for 24Mid-size care home · a licensed care home (RCFE)
  • Room at the last state visit20 of 24 beds occupiedDecember 19, 2025 · not a current opening
  • Ways to payMedi-Cal ALW acceptedDHCS participant list · August 9, 2026
  • Last state visitDecember 19, 2025CDSS inspection record

Milan Villa Senior Living is a mid-size care home in Livermore — a licensed residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE), the licence category behind “assisted living” and “board and care.” It is licensed for 24 residents since 2020. Bedridden care is not on file.

Built from CDSS public records · September 13, 2026. Every fact below names its source and date.

Quick answers and the state record

A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

Quick answers about Milan Villa Senior Living

Is Milan Villa Senior Living licensed?

The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

How many residents is Milan Villa Senior Living licensed for?

24 residents — a mid-size home, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

Has Milan Villa Senior Living been cited?

0 Type A and 1 Type B citation since 2020, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. Those records count 13 state visits over the same years.

Is Milan Villa Senior Living still open?

This license was on the CDSS roster as of September 28, 2026.

What does Milan Villa Senior Living cost?

$5,000 a month to start — listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026.

The home lists this starting rate on Seniorly for assisted living shared bedroom, seen September 9, 2026.

Among 33 other homes of a similar licensed size across Alameda County that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $3,000 to $5,801 a month, and the middle figure is $4,500 (n = 33 other homes publishing a starting rate).

Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.

A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.

The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.

A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.

Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out. What Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver covers in a care home.

Does Milan Villa Senior Living take Medi-Cal?

On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home appears on the DHCS participation list, August 9, 2026. Confirm eligibility and current participation with the program. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.

Who holds the license?

The license is held by La Jolla Cove Holdings, LLC, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

Can Milan Villa Senior Living keep a resident on hospice?

Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 12 residents, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

Milan Villa Senior Living license and inspection record

  • Name on the license: “MILAN VILLA SENIOR LIVING”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
  • License #19201003. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • Licensed for 24 residents — a mid-size home, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • Licensed to La Jolla Cove Holdings, LLC, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • First licensed in 2020, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • 13 state inspection visits since 2020, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • 0 Type A and 1 Type B citation on file since 2020, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. The same records count 13 state visits in that period.
  • 4 complaints and 1 substantiated allegation on file since 2020, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
  • The most recent state visit on file is December 19, 2025, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
Type A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗

See the state’s own record

Can they support the care needed?

California licenses a home for specific kinds of care. The state’s record lists what this home is approved for; the home’s own answers fill in what changes as needs change.

  • Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved · covers up to 24 residents
  • Dementia / memory careApproved by the state
  • Hospice careApproved · covers up to 12 residents
  • BedriddenNot on file · ask the home

State licensing record · September 13, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.

Read the state’s own wording
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER 24 AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 24 MAY BE NON-AMBULATORY. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 12.

983 - RCFE / DEMENTIA

CDSS record, verbatim · September 13, 2026

As needs change

  • Staying through hospice

    Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 12 — care may continue at the end of life

    Ask: “If hospice is needed, can care continue here until the end?”

    State licensing record · September 13, 2026

  • If memory loss develops

    Dementia-care designation on file

    Ask: “Can we read the dementia care disclosure and discuss how daily support works?”

    State licensing record · September 13, 2026

3 more questions to ask the home
  • Two-person transfers or a lift

    Not on file

    Ask: “If two people or a lift are needed to transfer, can the person stay?”

  • Someone awake overnight

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?”

  • Medicines

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who manages the medicines, and what happens when a dose is missed?”

Care & day-to-day support

These are the home’s own statements about its day-to-day practice — they are not part of the state licensing record, and the state has not approved or reviewed them.

What it costs here

This home’s starting rate

$5,000a month to start

Listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026 · See listing

Likely monthly total

$5,000a month

Likely $5,000–$5,600

With a shared room and basic help.

An estimate for planning, not a quote. The price is made in the phone call.

See the full cost breakdownRoom, care and fees · how people pay · where the price comes from
Room
Daily care
Sharing the room
  • Starting monthly rate$5,000this home

    The home lists this starting rate on Seniorly for assisted living shared bedroom, seen September 9, 2026.

  • Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600

    Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (45 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).

  • One-time move-in fee$2,000one time · likely $0–$4,000

    Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,000 (134 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.

Likely monthly totalLikely $5,000–$5,600
$5,000
First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $5,000–$9,100
$7,000
How people payOn the Medi-Cal waiver list · private pay, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
  • Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
  • Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home appears on the DHCS participation list, August 9, 2026. Confirm eligibility and current participation with the program. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board. For a resident on SSI/SSP, California’s 2026 standard sends $1,444.07 a month to the home for room and board.
  • SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
  • VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
  • Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
  • MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
If the money runs out, what Medi-Cal covers
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
  • The care level

    Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.

  • What is billed separately

    Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.

  • Move-in costs

    A one-time community fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.

  • Increases

    California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.

  • What is the full monthly cost for the room and care we need, and what does it include?
  • What would the next care level cost, and who decides when it changes?
  • What is billed separately, and is there a one-time fee or deposit at move-in?
  • Is any private-pay period required before another payment program can begin?
How this estimate worksWhere this price comes from

The home lists this starting rate on Seniorly for assisted living shared bedroom, seen September 9, 2026.

8 homes like this within 10 miles publish starting rates mostly between $4,350–$6,050.

  • Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
  • Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
  • Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
  • Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
  • We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
  • It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Show the 8 nearby homes behind this estimate

Where it is

  • 740 Holmes Street, Livermore, CA 94550Address from the public record · September 13, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.

Opening the neighborhood map…

The state record

California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. Here are the dated documents and the state’s own words, beside what is typical for homes this size.

Since 2021, the state has filed 12 documents for this home, and its records count 13 visits since 2020. The most recent — a complaint investigation report on December 19, 2025 — closed with the state’s outcome word: “Unsubstantiated.”

On file since
2021
State visits
13
Most recent visit
December 19, 2025
Occupied at that visit
20 of 24 bedsa count on that day, not an opening

We hold 4 complaint reports the state published for this home, dated February 16, 2024 to December 19, 2025. 4 of the 4 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (1), “Unsubstantiated” (3). 4 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word. Summary composed by computer from the 4 complaint reports below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

Beside homes the same size

  • Type A citations0typical 0
  • Type B citations1typical 1
  • Substantiated allegations1typical 2
  • Total complaints4typical 6

“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,354 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this licence since 2020.

Year by year
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated20253412024450202311020221102021110

The last 36 months — 10 of 12 documents

20253 state visits · 4 documents
Dec 19, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Questionable death of resident.

On 12/19/2025 at 9:30AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) G. Luk arrived unannounced to deliver complaint findings for the allegation above. LPA met with Campus Director, Isabel Poderoso and explained to her the reason for the visit. Executive Director, Janice Gombio arrived two hours later. During the course of the investigation, the Department conducted interviews with staff, residents, witnesses, and complainant. Resident’s physician's report, preplacement appraisal, appraisal needs and service plan, emergency information, admission agreement, incident reports, medical records, death certificate, coroner’s report, and ambulance report were obtained and reviewed. Incident report indicated that on 11/2/2024 staff heard a noise in resident’s (R1) room and found R1 on the floor laying on her right side. Staff (S2) observed R1 with facial grimacing and unable to move extremities, which S2 called 911 and R1 was transported to the hospital. R1’s medical record revealed that R1 sustained a left femoral neck fracture and had hip hemiarthroplasty procedure on 11/4/2024. (Continue on LIC9099C...) Unsubstantiated R1 passed away on 11/7/2024 as a result of complications of the procedure. Interview with witness indicated during the 911 call staff (S2) stated R1 fell as a result of being pulled or pushed by another resident (R2). However, interview with staff (S2 and S3) revealed that they did not know how R1 fell. S2 stated he did not know why he reported during the 911 call that R2 pulled or pushed R1 to the floor and R2 did not say that she pushed R1. S2 does not know how R1 ended up on the floor, but R2 reported that R1 had fallen. S3 stated R1 had a history of falls prior to the incident on 11/2/2024. Interview with staff and residents revealed that R2 did not have a history of physical aggression towards residents or R1. Residents (R3 and R4) stated R1 would walk into other resident’s rooms and take their belongings. Staff (S2 and S3) stated R2 would get upset with R1, but R2 was only seen to be verbally aggressive towards R1. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. Exit interview conducted with Janice Gombio. A copy of this report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 19, 2025 · control 15-AS-20241126153238
Dec 19, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not conduct re-evaluation after resident's change in condition.

On 12/19/2025 at 10:30AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) G. Luk arrived unannounced to conduct a complaint investigation and deliver findings in regards to the allegation above. LPA met with Campus Director, Isabel Poderoso and informed her the reason for visit. Executive Director, Janice Gombio arrived two hours later. During the course of investigation, LPA interviewed residents, staff, witness, and complainants. LPA reviewed and obtained documents including LIC500, staff schedule, physician's report, care plan, emergency information, facility notes, communication logs, and incident reports. After reviewing R1's file, LPA observed facility only had physician's report dated 2/28/2024 and care plan with most recent services initiated on 10/7/2024. Interview with staff (S1) revealed that R1's doctor was notified of R1's changes in condition. However, S1 stated that R1 did not have an updated physician's report and care plan completed. (Continue on LIC9099C...) Substantiated Based on LPA's information obtained during investigation, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met; therefore, the above allegation is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. California Code of Regulations, Title 22, are being cited on the attached LIC9099D. Exit interview conducted with Janice Gombio. A copy of this report and appeal rights provided. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. Exit interview conducted with Janice Gombio. A copy of this report provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 19, 2025 · control 15-AS-20250404142130

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87463(a) · Plan of correction due date: Jan 9, 2026

Reappraisals. (a) The pre-admission appraisal, as specified in Section 87457, Pre-Admission Appraisal, shall be updated in writing as frequently as necessary or once every 12 months, whichever occurs first, to note significant changes in condition... This requirement is not met as evidence by: Based on interview and record review, licensee did not comply with the section cited above by not updating reappraisal/care plan when R1 had a change in condition which poses a potential health and safety risk to the persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 19, 2025

Plan of correction: Executive Director (ED) has agreed to create a written plan to update care plans when residents have changes in condition. ED will submit plan to CCLD by POC date.

Nov 14, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

On 11/14/2025 at 2:00PM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) G. Luk arrived unannounced to conduct a Required - 1 Year inspection. LPA met with Executive Director, Janice Gombio and informed her the reason for the visit. LPA toured the facility including but not limited to bedrooms, bathrooms, dining area, activity rooms, kitchen, common areas, and outdoor area. Freezer’s temperature was registered at -11 degree F while the refrigerator’s temperature was recorded at 36 degrees F. Hot water temperature was measured at 105.3 degrees F in a resident bathroom. Grab bars and non-skid mats were observed in the showers and toilets. Smoke detectors were interconnected with sprinkler system. Carbon monoxide detectors were observed. Fire extinguishers were observed to be full and last serviced on 1/20/2025. First Aid kit is complete. Last disaster drill was conducted on 10/20/2025. LPA reviewed 5 residents and 4 staff files starting at 3:00PM. Residents' and staff files were complete. Staff were fingerprint cleared and associated to the facility. LPA reviewed a sample of resident's medications during inspection. No deficiencies are being cited on this date. Exit interview conducted with Janice Gombio. A copy of this report provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 14, 2025

The state marks this report as 4 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 2. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.

Mar 19, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Neglect resulting resident's dehydration. Resident developed pressure injuries while in care.

On 3/19/2025 at 2:10PM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) G. Luk arrived unannounced to conduct a complaint investigation and deliver findings in regards to the allegations above. LPA met with Executive Director, Janice Gombio and Campus Director, Isabel Poderoso. LPA informed them the reason for visit. During the investigation, LPA interviewed 2 residents, 3 staff, witness, and complainant. LPA reviewed and obtained documents including staff roster with contact information, staff schedule, physician's report, care plan, discharge documents, hospice information, emergency information, care notes, and death report. Neglect resulting resident's dehydration. R1's care plan indicated staff to encourage R1 to drink adequate amounts of fluids throughout the day with meals and offer preferred beverages with medication administration. Interview with staff revealed that R1 was given water during meals. S2 stated that R1 was given fluids 3-4 times per shift. (Continue on LIC9099C...) Unsubstantiated Resident developed pressure injuries while in care. Interview with W1 revealed that R1 did not develop pressure injuries during the time R1 was on hospice care. Interview with staff revealed that R1 was repositioned every 2 hours. R1's home health notes indicated that R1 was high risk of pressure sore, but did not indicate that R1 had pressure sore. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did occur, therefore these allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED. No deficiencies are being cited on this date. Exit interview conducted with Janice Gombio. A copy of this report provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 19, 2025 · control 15-AS-20240520151707
20244 state visits · 5 documents
Nov 27, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Health Checks

On 11/27/2024 at 10:20am, Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs), L. Hall and D. Doidge arrived unannounced to conduct a health and safety check as a result of the department receiving a complaint on 11/26/2024. LPA met with Isabel Poderoso, Campus Director, and explained the reason for the visit. Administrator, Janice Gambio, arrived at 10:53am. During the health and safety check, LPAs toured the facility including but not limited to common areas, kitchen, bathrooms, bedrooms and outdoor area. LPAs observed resident sitting in common area watching television, in bedrooms, and hallway. The facility is noted to be clean, in good repair, and residents in care appear to be safe. There is a minimum of 7-day non-perishables and 2-day perishables foods that is kept in the sister facility next door. There are no imminent health/safety concerns on today's date. No deficiencies were cited today. Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 27, 2024
Nov 14, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

On 11/14/2024 at 9:50AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) G. Luk arrived unannounced to conduct a Required - 1 Year inspection. LPA met with staff, Honey Yang and informed her the reason for the visit. Administrator, Janice Gombio arrived an hour later. LPA toured the facility including but not limited to bedrooms, bathrooms, dining area, activity rooms, kitchen, common areas, and outdoor area. Freezer’s temperature was registered at -10 degree F while the refrigerator’s temperature was recorded at 36 degrees F. Hot water temperature was measured at 106.5 degrees F in the hallway bathroom. Grab bars and non-skid mats were observed. There were adequate lights in each room. First Aid kit is complete. Smoke detectors were interconnected with sprinkler system. Carbon monoxide detector was observed. Fire extinguishers were observed to be full and last serviced on 1/4/2024. Indoor and outdoor passages were free of obstruction. LPA reviewed 5 residents and 4 staff files starting at 10:55AM. LPA reviewed a sample of resident's medications. LPA interviewed 3 staff during inspection. At 10:30AM, LPA reviewed Guardian system and observed S5 is not fingerprint cleared. At 11:30AM, LPA observed R2 does not have current medical assessment on file. At 11:40AM, LPA observed R5 does not have admission agreement on file. At 1:30PM, LPA observed unlocked cough medication in a resident's room. Staff locked up the medication during inspection. (Continue on LIC809C...) At 2:30PM, LPA observed R3's Docusate Sodium was not given according to doctor's order. R3 had doctor's order for Docusate 250mg daily at bedtime and Docusate 100mg as needed. Both orders were not discontinued. However, LPA observed on R3's MAR that Docusate was a PRN (as needed). Staff stated that R3 have not been taking Docusate daily. At 4:30PM, LPA R4's medical assessment stated that R4 is bedridden. R4 is not currently receiving hospice care. Staff stated that R4 needs assistance with turning and repositioning. Facility does not have a bedridden fire clearance. Civil penalty of $500 is being assessed. Facility was given technical violations and reports will be provided. The deficiencies were observed (see LIC 809D) and cited from the California Code of Regulations, Title 22. Failure to correct the deficiencies may result in civil penalties. Exit interview conducted. A copy of this report, civil penalties, and appeal rights were provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 14, 2024

The state marks this report as 7 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 5. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.

Oct 3, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Incident

On 10/3/2024 at 3:30PM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) G. Luk arrived unannounced to conduct a case management inspection in regards to incident report received on 9/19/2024. LPA met with Campus Director, Isabel Poderoso and explained the purpose of the visit. Incident report dated 9/19/2024 revealed that staff observed resident (R1) was not at the facility. R1's room door was locked and staff observed R1's window screen was broken. Facility called 911 and R1 returned to the facility with police. R1's family and doctor was notified. Interview with staff revealed that R1 exhibited behaviors in the morning of the incident including agitation, refusal of meals and medications, and restlessness. During record review, LPA observed that physician's report dated 1/17/2024 stated that R1 cannot leave the facility unassisted. The deficiency was observed (see LIC 809D) and cited from the California Code of Regulation, Title 22. Failure to correct the deficiency may result in civil penalty. Exit interview conducted. A copy of this report and appeal rights provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 3, 2024

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87468.2(a)(4) · Plan of correction due date: Oct 18, 2024

Additional Personal Rights of Residents in Privately Operated Facilities. To care, supervision...that meet their individual needs and are delivered by staff that are sufficient in numbers, qualifications, and competency... This requirement is not met as evidence by: Based on interview and record review, licensee did not comply with the section cited above by having a resident missing from the facility which poses a potential health and safety risk to the persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 3, 2024

Plan of correction: Facility has agreed to create a new care plan for R1 to address wandering behaviors and submit documents to CCLD by POC date.

Feb 16, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not ensure facility was free from pests

On 2/16/2024 at 9:45AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) G. Luk arrived unannounced to conduct a complaint investigation and deliver findings regarding the allegation above. LPA met with Campus Director, Isabel Poderoso and informed her the reason for visit. Administrator, Janice Gombio arrived 30 minutes later. During the investigation, LPA interviewed 4 residents, 2 staff, and complainant. LPA reviewed and obtained documents including pest inspection report and communication with doctors. LPA inspected the 5 residents' beds and mattresses and did not observe bed bugs or other insects. Pest inspection report completed on 1/18/2024 inspected the 5 resident's mattress, box spring, sheets, and surrounding area with no evidence of bed bugs or other insects discovered. Although the allegation may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did occur, therefore these allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. No deficiencies are being cited on this date. Exit interview conducted. A copy of this report provided. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 16, 2024 · control 15-AS-20240212143438
Feb 16, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Other

On 2/16/2024 at 12:30PM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) G. Luk arrived unannounced to conduct a case management visit. LPA met with Administrator, Janice Gombio and Campus Director, Isabel Poderoso. While LPA was at the facility for another visit, LPA observed the following deficiency: At around 10:00AM, LPA observed unlocked medication and vitamins was left on top of medication cart while residents were walking around. There was no staff present near the medication cart. Staff came back a couple minutes later and stated incorrect medication and vitamins was given. LPA advised staff the medication and vitamins needs to be locked up and inaccessible to residents. The deficiency was observed (see LIC 809D) and cited from the California Code of Regulation, Title 22. Failure to correct the deficiency may result in civil penalties. Exit interview conducted. A copy of this report and appeal rights provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 16, 2024

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87465(h)(2) · Plan of correction due date: Feb 17, 2024

Incidental Medical and Dental Care. Centrally stored medicines shall be kept in a safe and locked place that is not accessible... This requirement is not met as evidence by: Based on observation, licensee did not comply with the section cited above by having unlocked medication and vitamins which poses an immediate health and safety risk to the persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 16, 2024

Plan of correction: Administrator has agreed to re-train staff on centrally stored medication and submit training material and staff sign-in sheet to CCLD by POC date.

20231 state visit · 1 document
Nov 21, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

On 11/21/2023 at 11:10AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) G. Luk arrived unannounced to conduct a Required - 1 Year inspection. LPA met with Administrator, Janice Gombio and Campus Director, Isabel Poderoso. The facility’s fire clearance was approved for 24 non-ambulatory residents of which 12 residents may be under hospice care. LPA toured the facility including but not limited to bedrooms, bathrooms, dining area, activity rooms, kitchen, common areas, and outdoor area. Freezer’s temperature was registered at -20 degree F while the refrigerator’s temperature was recorded at 36 degrees F. Hot water temperature was measured at 108 degrees F in a resident's bathroom. Grab bars and non-skid mats were observed. There were adequate lights in each room. Centrally stored medications were locked in medication carts located outside the med room. First Aid kit is complete. Smoke detectors were interconnected with sprinkler system. Carbon monoxide detector was observed. Fire extinguishers were observed to be full and last serviced on 1/23/2023. Indoor and outdoor passages were free of obstruction. Last fire drill was conducted on 10/16/2023. LPA reviewed 5 resident and 3 staff files starting at 12:45PM. LPA interviewed 3 residents starting at 11:42AM. LPA reviewed a sample of resident's medications starting at 4:00PM. LPA interviewed 3 staff starting at 4:40PM. At 11:30AM, LPA observed facility does not have one week of non-perishable food supplies available. LPA was informed that non-perishable food supplies are kept at a different location. At 1:15PM, LPA observed R1 does not have current medical assessment and R1-R5 does not have current reappraisal needs and service plans on file. (Continue on LIC809C...) At 1:30PM, LPA observed R3 and R4 does not have TB test or chest x-ray results on file during record review. At 2:00PM, LPA observed S3 does not have current annual training completed. At 4:30PM, LPA observed R2 does not have the following medications at the facility including: Hydrocodone Acetaminophen 325mg, Robitussin Peak Cold DM syrup, and Carbamide Peroxide Solution. LPA observed R2 does not have discontinue orders for the three medications. At 5:10PM, LPA observed on Guardian that S4 was not fingerprint cleared. S4's status on Guardian was "closed - incomplete application". LPA observed that S4 left the facility during visit. Civil penalty of $500 is being assessed. The deficiencies were observed (see LIC 809D) and cited from the California Code of Regulations, Title 22 and Health & Safety Code. Failure to correct the deficiencies may result in civil penalties. Exit interview conducted. A copy of this report, civil penalty, and appeal rights were provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 21, 2023

The state marks this report as 6 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 5. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedthere was not enough evidence to prove a violation occurred — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe evidence showed the allegation was false, could not have happened, or had no reasonable basisType A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗

An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents and the questions below stand in their place.

Life here

Rooms, meals, the rhythm of a day, faith and language, pets and house rules — as the home describes them. Tap any detail for its source and date; nothing here is graded.

Find a detail about life at this home.

Rooms & the spaces they will use

  • Private bathroom

    Reported on aplaceformom.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Outdoor spaceOutdoor Common Areas

    Reported on aplaceformom.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Room typesPrivate · Shared Studios

    Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Common areasIndoor Common Areas

    Reported on aplaceformom.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Roll-in / accessible shower

    Reported on aplaceformom.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Visitor parking

    Reported on aplaceformom.com · seen September 9, 2026.

Meals, preferences & familiar food

Activities & the rhythm of a day

  • Activity types offeredActivities On-site

    Reported on aplaceformom.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Religious services at the home

    Reported on aplaceformom.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Religious services off site

    Reported on aplaceformom.com · seen September 9, 2026.

Faith, culture & language

  • Languages spoken by caregiversEnglish

    Reported on aplaceformom.com · seen September 9, 2026.

Pets, routines & independence

  • Residents may bring a petReported no

    Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

Visiting & staying involved

  • Transportation costs extra

    Reported on aplaceformom.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Public transit access claimed

    Reported on aplaceformom.com · seen September 9, 2026.

Before you call

Ask every home the same questions — the state’s record does not answer these. Keep the ones that matter and they travel with your saved homes.

  1. What is included in the monthly rate, and what costs extra?
  2. Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?
  3. Which rooms does the non-ambulatory approval cover, and what transfer support is provided?
  4. What could change whether someone can stay here?
  5. Can we see a bedroom and share a meal during a visit?

Other homes nearby

The nearest licensed homes in Alameda County, closest first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.

Explore Alameda County