Illustration — no photo of this home on file yet

Early Horizons Home Care

Small home·Licensed for 6·South San Francisco, California

Licensed since 2017Licence #415601026
  • Care approvals on fileWheelchair · Dementia · HospiceState licensing record · September 27, 2026
  • Estimated starting rate$5,600 a monthCovelight estimate · likely $4,600–$6,900
  • Home sizeLicensed for 6Small care home · a licensed care home (RCFE)
  • Room at the last state visit5 of 6 beds occupiedDecember 5, 2025 · not a current opening
  • Ways to payAsk the homeMedi-Cal ALW participation not on file
  • Last state visitSeptember 3, 2026CDSS inspection record

Early Horizons Home Care is a small care home in South San Francisco — a licensed residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE), the licence category behind “assisted living” and “board and care.” It is licensed for 6 residents since 2017. Bedridden care is not on file.

Built from CDSS public records · September 27, 2026. Every fact below names its source and date.

Quick answers and the state record

A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

Quick answers about Early Horizons Home Care

Is Early Horizons Home Care licensed?

The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

How many residents is Early Horizons Home Care licensed for?

6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Has Early Horizons Home Care been cited?

0 Type A and 0 Type B citations since 2017, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. Those records count 9 state visits over the same years.

Is Early Horizons Home Care still open?

This license was on the CDSS roster as of September 28, 2026.

What does Early Horizons Home Care cost?

$5,600 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $4,600–$6,900. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 17 small homes and similar homes within 3 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

Among 7 other homes of a similar licensed size in South San Francisco that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $5,500 to $5,938 a month, and the middle figure is $5,750 (n = 7 other homes publishing a starting rate).

Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.

A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.

The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.

A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.

Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.

Does Early Horizons Home Care take Medi-Cal?

On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.

Who holds the license?

The license is held by Yolanda Rogayan, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Is there a hospital nearby?

Kaiser Foundation Hospital - South San Francisco is 1.7 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.

Can Early Horizons Home Care keep a resident on hospice?

Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 2 residents, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Early Horizons Home Care license and inspection record

  • Name on the license: “EARLY HORIZONS HOME CARE”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
  • License #415601026. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • Licensed for 6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • Licensed to Yolanda Rogayan, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • First licensed in 2017, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • 9 state inspection visits since 2017, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • 0 Type A and 0 Type B citations on file since 2017, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. The same records count 9 state visits in that period.
  • 1 complaint and 0 substantiated allegations on file since 2017, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
  • The most recent state visit on file is September 3, 2026, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
Type A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗

See the state’s own record

Can they support the care needed?

California licenses a home for specific kinds of care. The state’s record lists what this home is approved for; the home’s own answers fill in what changes as needs change.

  • Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved · covers up to 6 residents
  • Dementia / memory careApproved by the state
  • Hospice careApproved · covers up to 2 residents
  • BedriddenNot on file · ask the home

State licensing record · September 27, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.

Read the state’s own wording
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 6 NON-AMBULATORY. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 2.

983 - RCFE / DEMENTIA

CDSS record, verbatim · September 27, 2026

As needs change

  • Staying through hospice

    Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 2 — care may continue at the end of life

    Ask: “If hospice is needed, can care continue here until the end?”

    State licensing record · September 27, 2026

  • If memory loss develops

    Dementia-care designation on file

    Ask: “Can we read the dementia care disclosure and discuss how daily support works?”

    State licensing record · September 27, 2026

3 more questions to ask the home
  • Two-person transfers or a lift

    Not on file

    Ask: “If two people or a lift are needed to transfer, can the person stay?”

  • Someone awake overnight

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?”

  • Medicines

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who manages the medicines, and what happens when a dose is missed?”

What it costs here

Covelight estimate

$5,600a month to start

Likely $4,600–$6,900

From 17 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file

Likely monthly total

$5,600a month

Likely $4,600–$7,050

With a shared room and basic help.

An estimate for planning, not a quote. The price is made in the phone call.

See the full cost breakdownRoom, care and fees · how people pay · how this estimate works
Room
Daily care
Sharing the room
  • Starting monthly rate$5,600likely $4,600–$6,900

    Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 17 small homes and similar homes within 3 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

  • Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600

    Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (45 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).

  • One-time move-in fee$2,000one time · likely $0–$4,000

    Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,000 (134 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.

Likely monthly totalLikely $4,600–$7,050
$5,600
First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $5,350–$10,100
$7,600
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
  • Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
  • Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
  • SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
  • VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
  • Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
  • MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
If the money runs out, what Medi-Cal covers
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
  • The care level

    Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.

  • What is billed separately

    Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.

  • Move-in costs

    A one-time community fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.

  • Increases

    California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.

  • What is the full monthly cost for the room and care we need, and what does it include?
  • What would the next care level cost, and who decides when it changes?
  • What is billed separately, and is there a one-time fee or deposit at move-in?
  • Is any private-pay period required before another payment program can begin?
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 17 small homes and similar homes within 3 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

17 homes like this within 3 miles publish starting rates mostly between $5,250–$6,250.

  • Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
  • Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
  • Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
  • Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
  • We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
  • It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Show the 17 nearby homes behind this estimate

Where it is

  • 2800 Shannon Dr, South San Francisco, CA 94080Address from the public record · September 27, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.

Opening the neighborhood map…

The state record

California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. Here are the dated documents and the state’s own words, beside what is typical for homes this size.

Since 2021, the state has filed 9 documents for this home, and its records count 9 visits since 2017. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated June 17, 2026.

On file since
2021
State visits
9
Most recent visit
September 3, 2026
Occupied · December 5, 2025 visit
5 of 6 bedsa count on that day, not an opening

We hold 2 complaint reports the state published for this home, dated September 10, 2025 to December 5, 2025. 2 of the 2 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Unfounded” (1), “Unsubstantiated” (1). 2 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word. Summary composed by computer from the 2 complaint reports below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

Beside homes the same size

  • Type A citations0typical 0
  • Type B citations0typical 0
  • Substantiated allegations0typical 0
  • Total complaints1typical 0

“Typical” is the statewide median across the 6,808 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this licence since 2017.

Year by year
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated202611020253402024110202311020221102021110

The last 36 months — 7 of 9 documents

20261 state visit · 1 document
Jun 17, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Deficiencies

On June 17, 2026, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Murial Han conducted an unannounced 10-day complaint visit and during the visit, LPA observed the following finding. LPA met with the administrator and explained the finding. During the visit, LPA observed a white plastic child proof door knob lock that was placed on the front door. According to the administrator and staff #1 (S1), this device is to prevent residents from leaving the facility unattended. LPA interviewed 3 residents (R1, R2 and R3) and all of the reported that they were not able to open the front door with the child proof door knob and they had to ask staff members to open the door. R1 stated that he/she open the door once and it was a hard struggle. Deficiency is cited under California Code of Regulations, Title, 22 cited on the LIC 809D. Failure to correct the deficiencies may result in civil penalties. This report is reviewed and discussed with administrator. A copy of this report and the appeal rights were provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 17, 2026

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87468.1(a)(6) · Plan of correction due date: Jun 18, 2026

87468.1 Personal Rights of Residents in All Facilities (6)To leave or depart the facility at any time and to not be locked into any room, building, or on facility premises by day...This requirement is not as evidenced by LPA observed a child proof door knob door placed on the front door and 3 out of 3 residents reported that they were not able to open the door without staff's assistance which poses an immediate health and safety risks to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 17, 2026

Plan of correction: The administrator has removed the child proof door knob lock during the visit. The administrator will submit a plan of correction to CCL to ensure personal rights of residents are met and the plan of correction will indicate staff training. The administrator will provide a copy of the POC to CCL by 6/17/2026.

20253 state visits · 4 documents
Dec 5, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Staff threatened illegal eviction

On 12/5/2025, LPA Grace Donato conducted an unannounced complaint investigation visit to deliver findings. LPA met with Administrator, Irene Mehta and explained the purpose of this visit. Regarding the allegation that Staff threatened illegal eviction, RP stated that ADM called a case worker (CW1) to start an eviction process for R1. This has now been put on hold and the resident is attending the Adult Day program and there is no eviction in process. According to ADM, R1 was having behavioral issues and an email was sent to CW1 regarding these changes. ADM also mentioned that the behaviors were just grounds for eviction but never said that the resident will be evicted. ADM even suggested additional counselling from the social worker (SW) that works with R1. Based on records review, the department has determined that the allegation was false, could not have happened and/or is without a reasonable basis, therefore the allegation is UNFOUNDED. Nothe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 5, 2025 · control 14-AS-20250605212144
Dec 5, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Other

On 12/5/2025, LPA Grace Donato conducted a Case Management-Other visit to deliver amended findings to a complaint. LPA met with Administrator Irene Mehta and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA delivered amended findings for complaint number 14-AS-20250605212144. Report is reviewed and copy is provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 5, 2025
Nov 14, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

On 11/14/2025, LPA Yi Sam Jian made an unannounced annual visit to the facility. LPA met with staff, Nelsie Carlos, and staff, Josielyn Pataray. The licensee, Yolanda Rogayan, was contacted by phone to obtain permission for staff to sign the report. Administrator, Irene Mehta arrived later during the visit. LPA explained the purpose of the visit. LPA toured the facility inside and outside including all of resident rooms, bathroom, common areas, kitchen area & garage. All outdoor and indoor passageway were free and clear of obstruction. No accessible bodies of water or fire safety hazards observed. Kitchen was inspected, sufficient supply of food observed. Medications, toxins and sharps stored appropriately and inaccessible to clients, a comfortable temperature was maintained, hot water temperature inspected to be compliant, furnishing and lighting was sufficient for comfort and safety. Carbon monoxide detector and smoke detector system inspected and met the requirements. fire extinguisher checked and fully charged. Facility has a written emergency disaster plan. Licensee has at least one completed first aid kit. Facility has an updated log for emergency drill. Technical violations were cited for the lack of updated client appraisals and for the facility’s ongoing efforts to obtain additional drinking water for residents in the event of an emergency. No deficiencies are cited at this time. Report is reviewed with administrator and a copy is provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 14, 2025

The state marks this report as 4 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 2. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.

Sep 10, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff restricted residents for visitation Residents are not accorded dignity and respect Residents are not allowed to use the telephone Residents are not allowed medical services from outside vendors Staff isolated resident

*** This is an amended report *** On 9/10/2025, LPA Grace Donato conducted an unannounced complaint investigation visit to deliver findings. LPA met with Administrator, Irene Mehta and explained the purpose of this visit. Regarding the allegation of Staff restricted residents for visitation, reporting party (RP) stated that the new house rules seem to limit the time that residents can spend with their family members for special occasions like Easter, birthdays, and family reunions, requiring them to be back in the house by 8PM, limit visiting hours to 10 am to 7 pm. LPA interviewed staff members. S2 mentioned that residents can go with their families as long as they need. They just need to call the facility to let them know if they will come in late so they will be aware what time the residents will be back. ADM mentioned too that as long as they call beforehand that they’ll be coming in late then its ok. page 1 of 3 Unsubstantiated *** This is an amended report *** LPA also interviewed residents. R2 mentioned that he/she has visitors sometimes and they do go out. No one has stopped any visitors from visiting him/her. Regarding the allegation of Residents are not accorded dignity and respect, RP stated that one resident complained that there were scheduled diaper changes so if someone had a wet or soiled diaper, they might have to wait more than an hour and half to be changed. According to ADM, there is no schedule to follow for change in diapers. The residents are checked every 4 hours and as needed. There was an instance where R1 doesn't want to get changed and the staff kept asking. An ombudsman arrived and talked to the resident and staff was able to change the diaper. ADM added that there are 2 residents who wear pull ups but are still able to go to the bathroom on their own. S2 also mentioned that they monitor the residents with regards to their diapers but sometimes they are the ones who doesn't want to get changed when they are having behaviors. They just wear it just in case of accidents, but all residents are able to go to the bathroom by themselves. For the allegation of Residents are not allowed to use the telephone and Staff isolated resident, RP stated that a day program attempted to contact a resident with home activities. ADM refused to give them the phone number to the house and insisted that all communication happen through her on her cell phone. According to the Day program they called the ADM and left messages. LPA interviewed the ADM and it was stated that they can call anytime and that the phone number for the facility is posted in the transparency website. ADM did not isolate any resident. Residents are able to receive phone calls. S2 also added that no one has called the facility to talk to the residents during this time. And if so, they give the phone to the resident. Other case workers and social workers also call the facility phone number. page 2 of 3 *** This is an amended report *** Residents also mentioned that they are able to talk to their family members. LPA observed during one of the facility visits that the phone was handed to a resident when a family member called. Regarding the allegation of Residents are not allowed medical services from outside vendors, RP stated that ADM was banning a medical provider from seeing his/her client at Early Horizons. LPA interviewed a third party provider (W1) and was stated that About 6 months ago, ADM blocked medical provider from providing care to one of the clients; stating that they were rude and disrespectful and not allowed in her facility. During ADMs interview, she stated that there was no health care provider being banned from seeing their clients. One of the residents (R3) needs constant reminder with appointments as sometimes residents forget. The residents doctors, social workers and managers are still the same from when ADM took over. There was an incident that happened where one of the case workers that came was shouting at R3. ADM told the case worker to lower his/her voice since there are other residents in the facility. The case worker was told to not to be disrespectful otherwise leave the facility. S2 confirmed that the case worker was shouting at the resident. Another witness (W2) mentioned that the case worker was indeed shouting at the resident. Based on interviews, records review and observations, the department has determined that although the allegations may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED. No deficiencies cited today. Report is reviewed and copy is provided. page 3 of 3the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 10, 2025 · control 14-AS-20250605212144
20241 state visit · 1 document
Dec 2, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

On 12/02/2024 LPA Grace Donato made an unannounced annual visit to the facility. LPA met with Co-Administrator Irene Mehta. LPA explained the purpose of the visit. LPA toured the facility inside and outside including all of resident rooms, common areas, kitchen area & garage. The indoor and outdoor passageways were free of obstruction. Facility has 2 storage sheds at the back which was checked by the LPA. LPA observed some residents resting in their bedrooms and living room. While touring the facility it was observed that the room temperature was at 70 deg F. Hot water was also tested in the bathrooms and the temperature was 110 deg F. The residents have adequate amount of linens and incontinence care items. All personal belongings are intact. Carbon monoxide monitors are working properly. Resident bedrooms are observed to be in good repair. Bathroom is equipped with grab bars non-skid floors. LPA checked the food supply and there is adequate amount of food, 2 days for perishables and & 7 days non-perishable. Emergency drills are logged and done every quarter. Three resident records and two staff records were reviewed. Resident records are updated, complete and signed. Staff records are complete, with training logs that have met the basic requirement. Facility has a certified administrator on site with complete certification and training requirements. Medication review was done, and all medications are accounted for, and centrally stored medication records are updated. No deficiencies are cited at this time. Report is reviewed with Administrator and a copy is provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 2, 2024
20231 state visit · 1 document
Dec 19, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

On 12/19/23 LPA Grace Donato made an unannounced annual visit to the facility. LPA met with Licensee Yolanda Rogayan. LPA explained the purpose of the visit. LPA toured the facility inside and outside including all of resident rooms, common areas, kitchen area & garage. The indoor and outdoor passageways were free of obstruction. LPA observed some residents resting in their bedrooms. While touring the facility it was observed that the room temperature was at 74 deg F. Hot water was also tested in the bathrooms and the temperature was 108 deg F. The residents have adequate amount of linens and incontinence care items. All personal belongings are intact. Carbon monoxide monitors are working properly. All fire extinguishers have been checked and current. Resident bedrooms are observed to be in good repair. Bathroom is equipped with grab bars non-skid floors. LPA checked the food supply and there is adequate amount of food, 2 days for perishables and & 7 days non-perishable. Emergency drills are logged and done every quarter. Four resident records and two staff records were reviewed. Resident records are updated, complete and signed. Staff records are complete, with training logs that have met the basic requirement. Facility has a certified administrator on site with complete certification and training requirements. Medication review was done, and all medications are accounted for, and centrally stored medication records are updated. No deficiencies are cited at this time. Report is reviewed with Administrator and a copy is provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 19, 2023
What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedthere was not enough evidence to prove a violation occurred — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe evidence showed the allegation was false, could not have happened, or had no reasonable basisType A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗

An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents and the questions below stand in their place.

Life here

Rooms, meals, the rhythm of a day, faith and language, pets and house rules — as the home describes them. Tap any detail for its source and date; nothing here is graded.

The home has not described daily life anywhere we have reviewed yet — that is the case for most small homes, and it says nothing about the home. These questions fill in the picture; keep the ones that matter to you.

Before you call

Ask every home the same questions — the state’s record does not answer these. Keep the ones that matter and they travel with your saved homes.

  1. What is included in the monthly rate, and what costs extra?
  2. Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?
  3. Which rooms does the non-ambulatory approval cover, and what transfer support is provided?
  4. What could change whether someone can stay here?
  5. Can we see a bedroom and share a meal during a visit?

Other homes nearby

The nearest licensed homes in San Mateo County, closest first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.

Explore San Mateo County