Mid-size home · Licensed for 7 · Daly City
PRN Care Home
87 Berta Cir, Daly City, CA 94015Licensed since 2017
Overview
No openings reported
- Approved by the state: Wheelchair · Dementia · HospiceState licensing record · October 26, 2026
- Licensed for 7: a mid-size care homeThe state license record
Ask this home
Free for families. A home gets your number only if you say yes.
Care and support
- Wheelchairup to 7 residents
- Dementia
- Hospiceup to 3 residents
Not on file: bedridden approval.
Approved by the state · State licensing record · October 26, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.
Read the state’s own wording
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 7 NON-AMBULATORY. APPROVED HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 3.
983 - RCFE / DEMENTIA
CDSS record, verbatim · October 26, 2026
As needs change
Staying through hospice
Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 3 — care may continue at the end of life
State licensing record · October 26, 2026
If memory loss develops
Dementia-care designation on file
State licensing record · October 26, 2026
We’ll ask for you. Not on file for PRN Care Home: two-person transfers or a lift, who is awake overnight and help with medicines. When we check availability, we ask about these too.
Check availabilityWhat it costs here
This home’s starting rate
$4,000a month to start
Listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026
Monthly cost breakdownWith a shared room and basic help · room, care and fees$4,000likely a month
Starting monthly rate$4,000this home
The home lists this starting rate on Seniorly for assisted living shared bedroom, seen September 9, 2026.
Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600
Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (44 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).
One-time move-in fee$2,500one time · likely $0–$4,000
Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,500 (133 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.
- Likely monthly totalLikely $4,000–$4,600
- $4,000
- First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $4,000–$8,150
- $6,500
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
- MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
- Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
- Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated October 1, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
- SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
- VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
- Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
Rates at nearby homes15 nearby homes publish starting rates of $4,500 to $6,500
15 homes like this within 3 miles publish starting rates mostly between $5,250–$6,500.
- Heirloom Gardens of Daly CityDaly City · 0.1 mi · Small home$6,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
- Delia's Retirement HomeSouth San Francisco · 0.7 mi · Small home$5,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Bel Amor IIISouth San Francisco · 1.1 mi · Small home$6,000Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- TLC Home CareSouth San Francisco · 1.6 mi · Small home$5,750Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Mccaffrey's Care HomeSouth San Francisco · 1.6 mi · Small home$4,500Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Heirloom Rose GardenSouth San Francisco · 1.7 mi · Small home$5,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living studio · seen September 9, 2026
- Anamarie Care HomeDaly City · 2.0 mi · Small home$4,800Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Family Affair Care HomeSan Bruno · 2.1 mi · Mid-size home$6,000Listed on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026
- Damenik's HomeSouth San Francisco · 2.1 mi · Mid-size home$6,500Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Elle's Care HomeDaly City · 2.3 mi · Small home$6,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Bougainvilleas Care HomeSouth San Francisco · 2.5 mi · Mid-size home$5,750Listed on Seniorly · assisted living · seen September 9, 2026
- Westborough Manor 6San Bruno · 2.8 mi · Small home$6,500Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Access Care CenterSan Bruno · 2.8 mi · Small home$5,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Home at CrestmoorSan Bruno · 2.9 mi · Small home$5,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Araville Residential Care Home IISan Bruno · 3.0 mi · Small home$5,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
How this estimate worksWhere this price comes from
The home lists this starting rate on Seniorly for assisted living shared bedroom, seen September 9, 2026.
- Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
- Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
- Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
- Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
- We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
- It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
- The care level
Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.
- What is billed separately
Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.
- Move-in costs
A one-time move-in fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.
- Increases
California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.
An estimate for planning, not a quote. A home sets the price after hearing about the care needed.
Daily life
Daily life here is not on file yet, and that says nothing about the home.
The best way to see it is a visit.
Request a tourWhere it is
87 Berta Cir, Daly City, CA 94015Address from the public record · October 26, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.
Opening the neighborhood map…
- AHMC Seton Medical CenterHospital · General acute care, on the state’s list1.3 mi
Straight-line distances; check the drive or the walk. Hospital: the nearest general acute care hospital on the state’s list (CDPH, September 16, 2026).
Open directionsThe state record
California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.
CDSS public record, read October 26, 2026 · License #415601009 · See the state’s own record
The last 36 months — 8 of 13 documents
Complaint outcomes in these 36 months, in the state’s words: 3 “Substantiated”.
20252 state visits · 3 documents
Oct 28, 2025Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
On October 28, 2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Komal Curley conducted an unannounced annual inspections. LPA met with Caregiver, Hongyi (Jack) Liang and explained the purpose of the visit. Administrator, Shengxi (Simon) Liu joined shortly thereafter. LPA toured the facility inside and outside including all of resident rooms, common areas & kitchen. The indoor and outdoor passageway was free of obstruction. No accessible bodies of water of fire safety hazards observed. This is a single story facility. There are three resident rooms, all of which were observed to be shared rooms. Resident rooms were observed with all required furniture. LPA observed Resident 1 (R1's) bed to have a full bed rail. Administrator indicated R1 is not on hospice. Two full bathrooms were observed to be odor-free and in good repair. Water temperature throughout the facility measured between 127-131 degrees F. Extra linen was observed to be present. Dining room was observed free from tripping hazards. A comfortable temperature of 71 degrees F is maintained and lighting is sufficient for comfort. LPA observed two day perishables and seven day non-perishables. Extra food supply was observed to be present. Sharps and chemicals were observed to be locked and inaccessible to residents. LPA observed R1's prescribed insulin unlocked and accessible in the refrigerator. Carbon monoxide monitors are working properly. All fire extinguishers have been checked and are observed charged. LPA reviewed 6 resident records and 4 staff records. Medication review was done, and all medications are accounted for, and centrally stored medication records are updated. Deficiencies of the California Code of Regulations, Title, 22 cited on the LIC809D. Failure to correct the deficiencies may result in civil penalties. Report is reviewed with the administrator, and a copy is provided with appeal rightsthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 28, 2025
The state marks this report as 9 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 8. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.
May 12, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff neglected to provide medical attention resulting into a stage 2 pressure injury
On 5/12/2025 LPA Grace Donato made an unannounced complaint investigation visit to deliver findings. LPA met with Care Staff Jack Liang and explained the purpose of the visit. Regarding the allegation, staff neglected to provide medical attention resulting into a stage 2 pressure injury, according to the reporting party, Resident 1 (R1) was observed to have a stage 2 pressure ulcer on his/her left heel that was still developing. LPA Charitra obtained the latest reappraisal of the resident dated 1/1/2025. There are no observations documenting a wound or stage 1 or 2 pressure injury. LPA Donato requested documentation of home health agreement from facility as proof that the stage 2 pressure ulcer was being addressed. After phone calls and emails, the facility was not able to present any written agreement. Based on records review, the allegation is determined to be substantiated. Deficiencies of the California Code of Regulations, Title, 22 cited on the LIC9099-D. Failure to correct the deficiencies may result in civil penalties. Report is reviewed and copy is provided with appeal rights. Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 12, 2025 · control 14-AS-20250226164710
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87463(b) · Plan of correction due date: May 13, 2025
87463 Reappraisals (b) The reappraisal shall document significant changes in the resident's physical, mental, cognitive, behavioral, or functional condition, including those required to be documented as specified in Section 87466, Observation of the Resident. This was not met as evidenced by Licensee does not have an updated Needs and Appraisal form to document a significant change in condition of R1 having Stage 2 Pressure ulcer.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 12, 2025
Plan of correction: Licensee to submit a plan on how it will address the documentation of significant changes in of a resident in the facility. Licensee to submit my POC deadline, 5/13/2025.
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87609(b)(4) · Plan of correction due date: May 13, 2025
87609 Allowable Health Conditions and the Use of Home Health Agencies (b) Incidental medical care may be provided to residents through a licensed home health agency provided the following conditions are met: (4)The licensee and home health agency agree in writing on the responsibilities of the home health agency, and those of the licensee in caring for the resident’s medical condition(s). This was not met as evidenced by Licensee was not able to provide a written agreement with a Home Health agency to address R1’s condition.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 12, 2025
Plan of correction: Licensee to submit a plan to ensure Home Health agreements are in place for residents needing the services. Licensee to also show proof of training for staff regarding Stage 1 and 2 pressure injuries. Licensee to submit my POC deadline, 5/13/2025.
May 12, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff neglected to provide medical attention resulting into a stage 2 pressure injury
On 5/12/2025 LPA Grace Donato made an unannounced complaint investigation visit to deliver findings. LPA met with Care Staff Jack Liang and explained the purpose of the visit. Regarding the allegation, staff neglected to provide medical attention resulting into a stage 2 pressure injury, according to the reporting party, Resident 1 (R1) was observed to have a stage 2 pressure ulcer on his/her left heel that was still developing. LPA Charitra obtained the latest reappraisal of the resident dated 1/1/2025. There are no observations documenting a wound or stage 1 or 2 pressure injury. LPA Donato requested documentation of home health agreement from facility as proof that the stage 2 pressure ulcer was being addressed. After phone calls and emails, the facility was not able to present any written agreement. Based on records review, the allegation is determined to be substantiated. Deficiencies of the California Code of Regulations, Title, 22 cited on the LIC9099-D. Failure to correct the deficiencies may result in civil penalties. Report is reviewed and copy is provided with appeal rights. Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 12, 2025 · control 14-AS-20250226164710
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87463(b) · Plan of correction due date: May 13, 2025
87463 Reappraisals (b) The reappraisal shall document significant changes in the resident's physical, mental, cognitive, behavioral, or functional condition, including those required to be documented as specified in Section 87466, Observation of the Resident. This was not met as evidenced by Licensee does not have an updated Needs and Appraisal form to document a significant change in condition of R1 having Stage 2 Pressure ulcer.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 12, 2025
Plan of correction: Licensee to submit a plan on how it will address the documentation of significant changes in of a resident in the facility. Licensee to submit my POC deadline, 5/13/2025.
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87609(b)(4) · Plan of correction due date: May 13, 2025
87609 Allowable Health Conditions and the Use of Home Health Agencies (b) Incidental medical care may be provided to residents through a licensed home health agency provided the following conditions are met: (4)The licensee and home health agency agree in writing on the responsibilities of the home health agency, and those of the licensee in caring for the resident’s medical condition(s). This was not met as evidenced by Licensee was not able to provide a written agreement with a Home Health agency to address R1’s condition.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 12, 2025
Plan of correction: Licensee to submit a plan to ensure Home Health agreements are in place for residents needing the services. Licensee to also show proof of training for staff regarding Stage 1 and 2 pressure injuries. Licensee to submit my POC deadline, 5/13/2025.
20243 state visits · 5 documents
Dec 20, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Resident left the facility unassisted
On December 20, 2024, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Komal Charitra conducted an unannounced 10-day complaint visit. LPA met with Administrator, Shengxi (Simon) Liu and explained the purpose of the visit. Regarding the allegation, resident left the facility unassisted, according to the reporting party, on 12/11/2024, Resident 1 (R1), left the facility twice at 11am and 4pm. At 11am R1 was found in the neighborhood and at 4pm R1 was found in San Francisco. During the visit, LPA interviewed the administrator and reviewed R1's file. According to the administrator, on 12/11/24, there was one staff member present when R1 left the facility at 11am because administrator went to get groceries. At 4pm, on the same day, there were two staff members present, however because they were helping other residents and despite having door alarms, R1 left the facility again and was found in San Francisco. According to R1's file, R1 has a diagnosis of dementia and is unable to leave the facility unassisted. Therefore, the allegation resident left the facility unassisted is determined to be substantiated. Deficiencies of the California Code of Regulations, Title, 22 cited on the LIC9099-D. Failure to correct the deficiencies may result in civil penalties. Report is reviewed with the administrator and a copy is provided with appeal rights. Copy of an immediate $500 civil penalty is provided due to absence of supervision. Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 20, 2024 · control 14-AS-20241216115839
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87464(f)(1) · Plan of correction due date: Dec 21, 2024
87464 Basic Services: (f) Basic services shall at a minimum include: (1) Care and supervision as defined in Section 87101(c)(3) and Health and Safety Code section 1569.2(c). This requirement is not met as evidenced by Based on file reviews and interviews, R1 has a diagnosis of dementia and is unable to leave the facility unassisted, however R1 left the facility two times on 12/11/24, at 11am and at 4pm. Although the facility doors have working alarms, R1 was still able to leave the facility with two staff members being present which poses an immediate health and safety risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 20, 2024
Plan of correction: The Licensee/Administrator will develop a plan to ensure residents are being supervised at all times and to evaluate residents if they are elopement risks. Administrator/licensee will provide a copy of the plan to CCL by 12/21/24 Immediate Civil Penalty of $500.00 is being assessed today 12/20/24 for absence of supervision.
Dec 20, 2024Facility evaluation reportCase Management - DeficienciesDeficiency page: Type A
Type of visit: Case Management - Deficiencies
On December 20, 2024, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Komal Charitra conducted an unannounced case-management visit in relation to complaint control #14-AS-20241216115839. LPA met with Administrator, Shengxi (Simon) Liu and explained the purpose of the visit. During the complaint visit, it was indicated by the administrator that there were six residents at the facility, all which have dementia based on file reviewed. Administrator stated that he went to get groceries for the facility when Resident 1 (R1) eloped. At the time there was only one staff member (S1) providing care to the six residents with dementia. According to the administrator, S1 had to call the administrator to let him know that R1 eloped. Because there was no other staff member present, S1 was unable to leave all the residents to go find R1. Nevertheless, due to the lack of staffing, R1 was able to elope from the facility twice on 12/11/24. Deficiencies of the California Code of Regulations, Title, 22 cited on the LIC809D. Failure to correct the deficiencies may result in civil penalties. Report is reviewed with the administrator, and a copy is provided with appeal rights.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 20, 2024
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87411(a) · Plan of correction due date: Dec 21, 2024
87411 Personnel Requirements - General: (a) Facility personnel shall at all times be sufficient in numbers, and competent to provide the services necessary to meet resident needs... This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews and file reviews, on 12/11/24, there were six residents at the facility, all which have dementia. According to the administrator, he went to get groceries for the facility when R1 eloped and S1 was the only one present providing care to all six residents. Nevertheless, due to the lack of staffing, R1 was able to elope from the facility twice on 12/11/24 which poses an immediate health and safety risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 20, 2024
Plan of correction: Facility shall submit a new LIC500 and submit a plan to ensure staffing is sufficient throughout the day/night. Facility shall submit a plan on how to ensure residents needs are being met, including hiring additional staff if required
Sep 20, 2024Facility evaluation reportPOCReport on file
Type of visit: POC
On September 20, 2024, Licensing Program Analystss(LPAs) Komal Charitra and Kiran Jain conducted an unannounced plan of correction (POC) visit to verify and to confirm that the facility is in compliance with the citations that were issued on 09/18/2024 during an annual inspection. LPAs met with Caregivers, May Yu and Hongyi Liang, and explained the purpose of the visit. ShengXi Liu, Administrator joined shortly after. On 09/18/2024, the facility was cited for California Code of Regulation (CCR), 87303(a) Maintenance and Operation, 87303(d) Maintenance and Operation, 87305(a) Alterations to Existing Building or New Facilities, 87307(a)(2)(B) Personal Accommodations and Services, 87307(d)(6) Personal Accommodations and Services, 87309(a) Storage Space, 87555(b)(8) General Food Service Requirements, 87412(g) Personnel Records, 87465(h)(2) Incidental Medical and Dental Care Services, 1569.695(c) Other Provisions,87506(a), 87705(j) Care of Persons with Dementia, 87506(a) Resident Records. Deficiencies, 87309(a), 87555(b)(8), 87465(h)(2) were all cleared and dismissed during the annual visit conducted on 9/18/2024. During the visit, LPAs observed and cleared the following deficiencies; California Code of Regulations, Section, 87303(a) as LPAs observed bathroom in bedroom #4 was clean and dry, partially burnt power strip was replaced, mold in bedroom #3 was cleaned/fixed, 87303(d) as LPAs observed an additional lighting fixture was installed in bedroom #3, 87307(d)(6) as all indoor and outdoor passageways were observed to be clear and free from obstruction, 87705(j) as LPAs observed door alarm in bedroom #4 was observed to be in working condition, 87506(a) as resident records reviewed were updated and current. No deficiencies cited during the visit. Report is reviewed with ShengXi Liu, Administrator, and a copy is provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 20, 2024
Sep 20, 2024Facility evaluation reportCase Management - DeficienciesDeficiency page: Type A
Type of visit: Case Management - Deficiencies
On September 20, 2024, Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Kiran Jain and Komal Charitra conducted an unannounced case management visit to follow up on a visit conducted on 9/18/2024. LPAs met with Administrator, ShengXi Liu, and Caregivers, May Yu and Hongyi Liang and explained the purpose of the visit. During the visit, LPAs observed caregiver (S1) to not be fingerprint cleared at the facility. Based on interviews and file reviews, S1 was determined to not have fingerprint clearance. According to the administrator, S1 has been working at the facility for over a year and has been providing care and supervision to residents in care. An civil penalty of $500 is assessed ($100 x 5 days) for Caregiver not being fingerprint cleared, however providing care and supervision to residents in care. Deficiency of the Residential Care Elderly California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6 is observed and cited on a LIC 809D. Failure to correct the deficiencies may result in civil penalties. Report is reviewed with Administrator, ShengXi Liu and a copy is provided with appeal rights. A copy of the civil penalty is also provided to the administrator.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 20, 2024
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87355(e)(1) · Plan of correction due date: Sep 21, 2024
Criminal Record Clearance: (e) All individuals subject to a criminal record review pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 1569.17(b) shall prior to working, residing or volunteering in a licensed facility: (1)Obtain a California clearance or a criminal record exemption as required by the Department or.... Violation of this regulation is not met as evidenced by: Based on observations, LPAs observed S1 to providing care and supervision to clients in care however, based on record review, S1 was obseved to not have any fingerprint clearance. According to the administrator, S1 has been working at the facility for more than a year.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 20, 2024
Plan of correction: Licensee/Administrator shall ensure S1 does not work and/or is present at the facility until S1 is fingerprint cleared or has an exemption
Sep 18, 2024Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
On September 18, 2024, Licensing Program Analysts (LPA) Kiran Jain and Komal Charitra conducted an unannounced annual inspection. LPAs met with Caregivers, May Yu and Hongyi Liang and explained the purpose of the visit. ShengXi Liu, Administartor joined shortly after. LPAs toured the facility inside and outside including but not limited to; all of resident rooms, common areas, garage, and bathrooms. No accessible bodies of water or fire safety hazards were observed. LPAs observed 4 resident rooms; 3 of which are shared rooms and 1 private resident room. Auditory alarm on the exit door in Bedroom #4 was observed to not be working. LPAs observed a partially burnt power-strip in bedroom #4. LPAs toured bedroom #2, medication was observed to be on the table next to resident's bed. LPAs toured bedroom #3 and observed mold on the ceiling and a small light fixture that doesn't provide sufficient lighting. Bathroom observed in the main hallway was observed to have chemicals on the floor. Bathroom located in Bedroom #4 was observed to have water on the floor and the faucet observed to be in disrepair. Water temperature throughout the facility measured at 116.2 degrees F. Exit route from bedroom #4 going outside to the patio area in the backyard was observed to be shared with the home next door. The exit route was not clear from obstruction. LPAs observed suitcases, furniture, etc blocking passageway. LPA toured kitchen and observed two day perishable and seven day non-perishables. Fridge was observed to have open containers of food and expired milk. Sharps, chemicals, and medications were observed to be unlocked and accessible to residents. Living room and dining area were observed free from tripping hazards. A comfortable temperature is maintained and lighting is sufficient for comfort. Carbon monoxide monitor was working properly. LPAs observed a closet in the living room, right across from the kitchen to have a bed and personal belongings. LPAs toured the garage and observed washer and dryer to be in good repair. An extra refrigerator was observed with expired milk located in the freezer. During the tour of the garage, LPAs observed an office room in the garage that was observed to be constructed. LPAs observed a monitor, desk, chair and files. (Continue to 809C). Garage was observed to be cluttered and passageway was blocked. Emergency drill logs were not provided to LPAs. According to staff interviewed, there has been no drills conducted since he/she was hired. LPA reviewed 5 resident records. 2/5 resident files were not completed and updated. The other 3 files reviewed were updated, complete and signed. Personnel records were not present at the facility and facility staff were unable to provide personnel files to review. Medication review was done, and all medications are accounted for, and centrally stored medication records are updated. Deficiency of the Residential Care Elderly California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6 is observed and cited on a LIC 809D. Failure to correct the deficiencies may result in civil penalties. Report is reviewed with ShengXi Liu, Administartor and a copy is provided with appeal rights.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 18, 2024
Earlier years2021 to 2023 · 5 documents
20232 state visits · 3 documents
Mar 22, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnfounded
Allegation investigated: Facility staff is not properly using residents' P & I money.
On 3/22/2023, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Murial Han conducted an unannounced visit to deliver the findings to complaint # 14-AS-20221208135034. LPA Han met with the caregiver, Jack Liang and explained the purpose of the visit. Caregiver called the administrator, Simon Liu informing of LPA's visit. Regarding to allegation of facility staff is not properly using residents' P & I money, the administrator, Simon Liu denied the allegation and stated that the facility does not handle resident's personal funds. According to the administrator, resident #1 (R1) gets 2 SSI checks every month; one for the monthly payment at the facility and the other one for resident's personal needs. When the checks arrived, the facility called R1's responsible party to come and pick up the SSI check for R1's personal needs. Unfounded Regarding to resident #2 (R2) who was only getting one SSI check for the monthly payment at the facility, however, last month R2 received an additional SSI personal needs check and the facility contacted R2's responsible party who came and picked it up. According to facility staff #1 (S1) who has been working at the facility since 2017, when resident's SSI personal needs checks arrived, the facility would contact the responsible party to come and pick it up. LPA interviewed R2's responsible party who validated that the SSI check was picked up. LPA attempted to call R1's responsible party multiple times but no one answered and the voicemail was not set up and staff stated that R1's responsible party never picked up the phone. He/she would come to the facility every month or every other month to pick up the SSI personal check(s). Based on the documents provided by the facility, LPA observed R1 and R2's SSI personal needs checks were signed and picked up by the responsible parties in March 2023. After the investigation, the Department has found that this allegation to be UNFOUNDED, meaning that this allegation was false, could not have happened and/or is without a reasonable basis. This report is reviewed and discussed with the administrator over phone. A copy is provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 22, 2023 · control 14-AS-20221208135034
Mar 2, 2023Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated
Allegation investigated: - Staff does not adequately maintin resident's medication records - Staff does not provide adequate food service
LPA Jeung met with staff, observed clients--one at dining table and 2 in their bedrooms--inspected food supply, and reviewed client files, including medications. LPA observed clients' medications--2 clients get medications from 1 pharmacy. Based on information observed during this visit, these allegations are substantiated. The preponderance of evidence standard has been met. Facility does not maintain Centrally Stored Medication Records, which are required. LPA observed that Medication Administration Records are maintained, which are not required. Two day supply of fresh vegetables is not maintained. Half a head of napa cabbage is observed in refrigerator as well as 2-day supply of fresh protein and fruit, 7 day supplies of canned fruit, vegetables and protein. Deficiencies of the California Code of REgulations, Title 22, are cited on a following page. Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 2, 2023 · control 14-AS-20230222144033
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87465(h)(6) · Plan of correction due date: Mar 9, 2023
INCIDENTAL MEDICAL CARE A record of centrally stored prescription medications for each resident shall be maintained & include names of the resident for whom prescribed, prescribing physician and pharmacist, drug name, strength, & quantity, dates filled, started & expiration, prescription number and instructions. This requirement is not met, as evidenced by review of client records and absence of Centrally Stored Medications Records. Licensee failed to ensure that CSMR is maintained to track clients' medications, which poses a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to clients in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 2, 2023
Plan of correction: Centrally Stored Medications Records for all clients will be completed and maintained. Copies of CSMRs to be sent to CCLD BY DUE Date with plan of correction.
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87555(b)(26) · Plan of correction due date: Mar 9, 2023
FOOD SERVICE Supplies of nonperishable foods for a minimum of one week and perishable foods for a minimum of two days shall be maintained on the premises. This requirement is not met, as facility does not maintain at least a 2 day supply of fresh vegetables. Licensee failed to ensure that at least 2-day supply of fresh food is maintained, which poses a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to clients in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 2, 2023
Plan of correction: Facility shall at all times maintain at least 2-day supply of fresh fruit, vegetables and protein. REceipt for 2- day supply of fresh vegetables to be sent to CCLD BY DUE DATE.
Mar 2, 2023Facility evaluation reportCase Management - DeficienciesDeficiency page: Type B
Type of visit: Case Management - Deficiencies
During complaint investigation, LPA Jeung observed deficiency of the California Code of REgulations, Title 22. Deficiency cited on a following page. The following medications are not maintained: Client #1--Hydrocort 10 mg Client #2--Lopid (Gemfibrozil) 600 mg Client #3--Acetaminophen 500 mg, Docusate Sodium 250 mg, Haldol 1 mg, Cough & Chest Congestion D, Sarna Sensitive Anti-Itch, Senna 8.5 mgthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 2, 2023
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87465(i)(1-4) · Plan of correction due date: Mar 9, 2023
INCIDENTAL MEDICAL CARE Prescription medications which are... otherwise to be disposed of shall be destroyed in the facility by the facility administrator & one other adult who is not a resident. Both shall sign a record, to be retained for at least 3 years, which lists...: Name of the resident, Rx number, name of pharmacy, drug name, strength, quantity destroyed, date of destruction. This requirement is not met, as medications included on 3 clients' Medication Administration Records were stopped or discarded, per staff, but there is no documentation maintained of the MD orders or destruction. Licensee failed to ensure that records are maintained for med destruction, which poses a potential risk.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 2, 2023
Plan of correction: Plan of correction to be submitted to CCLD BY DUE DATE This shall include explanation of whereabouts for 6 medications for client #3, and 1 medication each for clients #1 and #2.
20221 state visit · 1 document
Mar 9, 2022Facility evaluation reportCase Management - OtherReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Other
On March 9, 2022, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Komal Charitra conducted an unannounced case management visit to follow up on the annual visit from October 21, 2021. LPA met with Caregiver, Albert Liu and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA was screened at entry point. LPA toured the facility and observed 3 residents and 2 caregivers, including Albert during the visit. LPA Charitra observed 4 resident rooms and 2 bathrooms. LPA observed a closet room in front of the kitchen. LPA advised the caregivers that the closet should not be used as a personal accommodation for staff or residents. In addition, LPA Charitra indicated that no room commonly used for other purposes shall be used as a sleeping room for any resident or staff. No citations were issued at this time. Report reviewed with Caregiver, Albert Liu and a copy will be provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 9, 2022
20211 state visit · 1 document
Oct 21, 2021Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
On October 21, 2021, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Komal Charitra and Licensing Program Manager (LPM) Julio Montes, conducted an unannounced annual inspection. LPA and LPM observed COVID-19 signs posted by the entrance. LPA and LPM were greeted by Albert Liu (S1). LPA and LPM explained the purpose of the visit. LPA and LPM's temperature was checked at the front entrance, however, S1 did not ask screening questions. LPA toured facility grounds. No accessible bodies of water. The house consists of a central area with the dining area and living room area. There is access to the kitchen and the garage. To the left of the front door are 3 bedrooms and 2 bathrooms, and to the right from the entrance there is another bedroom. The floor plan appears to differ to the original plan of 2017. It is noted that a new facility floor plan was received by CCLD on September 3, 2019, showing that the staff bedroom had been converted to a residents' room, and a new structure built in front of the kitchen and converted to caregiver's room. The most recent fire clearance is dated May of 2017. A new fire clearance will be needed. Kitchen area is covered with plastic and has a locking device on the door. The bedrooms were observed and the beds in the semi-private rooms are 6 feet apart. Bathrooms were equipped with liquid hand soap. LPA advised S1 to get rid of bar soaps, have paper-towels instead of hand towels, and to cover trash cans with lids. Medications are locked and inaccessible to residents, however the keys are accessible to anyone. A comfortable temperature is maintained, lighting is sufficient for comfort. Infection control practices are not reviewed: entry procedures, COVID-19 signage, and 30-Day supply of PPE. According to S1, all residents are vaccinated and one is on Hospice. Two residents are in the hospital. LPA requests for the following documents be submitted by 10/28/2021: -LIC500 -A copy of Administrator Certificate Deficiency of the Residential Care Elderly California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6 is observed and cited on a LIC 809D. Failure to correct the deficiencies may result in civil penalties. This report is reviewed with S1 and a copy will be provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 21, 2021
The state marks this report as 3 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 2. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.
4 of 7 beds were occupied at the May 12, 2025 state visit — a count on that day, not an opening.
License holder
Chunjie Hu Prn Care Home LLC, licensed since 2017.
The state’s totals for this licenseSince 2017, as the state’s facility page counts them
- State visits on file
- 14
- Total complaints
- 4
- Substantiated allegations
- 4
- Type A citations
- 2
- Type B citations
- 2
These are the state’s own totals for this license since 2017, per CDSS records. The state counts them apart from the documents above, and they can differ from what those documents show; the documents say what each visit found. One complaint can contain several allegations.
Compare with homes the same size
| This home | Typical | |
|---|---|---|
| Type A citations | 2 | 0 |
| Type B citations | 2 | 0 |
| Substantiated allegations | 4 | 0 |
| Total complaints | 4 | 1 |
“Typical” is the statewide median for licensed homes this size. It does not adjust for years licensed, and older licenses have had more visits and reports. The median is across the 327 licensed mid-size homes (7–15 beds) in the state record. The figures compared are the state’s totals, not the documents.
What the state’s words mean
CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents stand in their place.
Frequently asked questions
A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.
Quick answers about PRN Care Home
Is PRN Care Home licensed?
The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
How many residents is PRN Care Home licensed for?
7 residents — a mid-size home, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Has PRN Care Home been cited?
2 Type A and 2 Type B citations since 2017, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. Those records count 14 state visits over the same years.
Is PRN Care Home still open?
This license was on the CDSS roster as of November 11, 2026.
What does PRN Care Home cost?
$4,000 a month to start — listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026.
The home lists this starting rate on Seniorly for assisted living shared bedroom, seen September 9, 2026.
Among 55 other homes of a similar licensed size across San Mateo County that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $5,850 to $7,375 a month, and the middle figure is $6,500 (n = 55 other homes publishing a starting rate).
Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date between September and October 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.
A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.
The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.
A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.
Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
Does PRN Care Home take Medi-Cal?
On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated October 1, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
Who holds the license?
The license is held by Chunjie Hu Prn Care Home LLC, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Is there a hospital nearby?
AHMC Seton Medical Center is 1.3 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.
Can PRN Care Home keep a resident on hospice?
Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 3 residents, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
PRN Care Home license and inspection record
- Name on the license: “PRN CARE HOME LLC”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
- License #415601009. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- Licensed for 7 residents — a mid-size home, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- Licensed to Chunjie Hu Prn Care Home LLC, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- First licensed in 2017, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- 14 state inspection visits since 2017, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- 2 Type A and 2 Type B citations on file since 2017, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. The same records count 14 state visits in that period.
- 4 complaints and 4 substantiated allegations on file since 2017, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
- The most recent state visit on file is October 28, 2025, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗
Nearby
Other homes nearby
Licensed homes near this one in San Mateo County, most information on file first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.
- Map
Starting rate
$6,500 a month to start
Listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Map
Starting rate
$5,500 a month to start
Listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$6,050 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $4,950–$7,450On the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$5,400 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $4,400–$6,650On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$5,450 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $4,500–$6,750On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$5,050 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $4,150–$6,200On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
Street maps © Protomaps · © OpenStreetMap
Explore San Mateo County