Illustration — no photo of this home on file yet

Araville Residential Care Home II

Small home·Licensed for 6·San Bruno, California

Licensed since 2012Licence #415600855
  • Care approvals on fileWheelchair · HospiceState licensing record · September 27, 2026
  • Starting rate$5,500 a monthListed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026
  • Home sizeLicensed for 6Small care home · a licensed care home (RCFE)
  • Room at the last state visit6 of 6 beds occupiedMarch 17, 2025 · not a current opening
  • Ways to payAsk the homeMedi-Cal ALW participation not on file
  • Last state visitJuly 29, 2026CDSS inspection record
  • Licence holderPaniza, Dorie & LambertoSince 2012 · 2 licensed homes

Araville Residential Care Home II is a small care home in San Bruno — a licensed residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE), the licence category behind “assisted living” and “board and care.” It is licensed for 6 residents since 2012. Dementia care and bedridden care are not on file.

Built from CDSS public records · September 27, 2026. Every fact below names its source and date.

Quick answers and the state record

A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

Quick answers about Araville Residential Care Home II

Is Araville Residential Care Home II licensed?

The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

How many residents is Araville Residential Care Home II licensed for?

6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Has Araville Residential Care Home II been cited?

0 Type A and 1 Type B citation since 2012, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. Those records count 6 state visits over the same years.

Is Araville Residential Care Home II still open?

This license was on the CDSS roster as of September 28, 2026.

What does Araville Residential Care Home II cost?

$5,500 a month to start — listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026.

The home lists this starting rate on Seniorly for assisted living shared bedroom, seen September 9, 2026.

Among 6 other homes of a similar licensed size in San Bruno that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $5,500 to $6,000 a month, and the middle figure is $5,500 (n = 6 other homes publishing a starting rate).

Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.

A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.

The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.

A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.

Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.

Does Araville Residential Care Home II take Medi-Cal?

On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.

Who holds the license?

The license is held by Paniza, Dorie & Lamberto, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Is there a hospital nearby?

Kaiser Foundation Hospital - South San Francisco is 2.5 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.

Can Araville Residential Care Home II keep a resident on hospice?

Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 2 residents, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Araville Residential Care Home II license and inspection record

  • Name on the license: “ARAVILLE RESIDENTIAL CARE HOME II”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
  • License #415600855. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • Licensed for 6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • Licensed to Paniza, Dorie & Lamberto, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • First licensed in 2012, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • 6 state inspection visits since 2012, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • 0 Type A and 1 Type B citation on file since 2012, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. The same records count 6 state visits in that period.
  • 2 complaints and 1 substantiated allegation on file since 2012, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
  • The most recent state visit on file is July 29, 2026, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
Type A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗

See the state’s own record

Can they support the care needed?

California licenses a home for specific kinds of care. The state’s record lists what this home is approved for; the home’s own answers fill in what changes as needs change.

  • Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved by the state
  • Dementia / memory careNot on file · ask the home
  • Hospice careApproved · covers up to 2 residents
  • BedriddenNot on file · ask the home

State licensing record · September 27, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.

Read the state’s own wording
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. SIX MAY BE NON-AMBULATORY. SUBJECT TO THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE HOSPICE WAVIER FOR TWO RESIDENTS.

985 - RCFE / HOSPICE

CDSS record, verbatim · September 27, 2026

As needs change

  • Staying through hospice

    Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 2 — care may continue at the end of life

    Ask: “If hospice is needed, can care continue here until the end?”

    State licensing record · September 27, 2026

4 more questions to ask the home
  • Two-person transfers or a lift

    Not on file

    Ask: “If two people or a lift are needed to transfer, can the person stay?”

  • Someone awake overnight

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?”

  • Medicines

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who manages the medicines, and what happens when a dose is missed?”

  • If memory loss develops

    Dementia-care designation not on file

    Ask: “If memory loss develops, what would change — and when would a move be needed?”

What it costs here

This home’s starting rate

$5,500a month to start

Listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026 · See listing

Likely monthly total

$5,500a month

Likely $5,500–$6,100

With a shared room and basic help.

An estimate for planning, not a quote. The price is made in the phone call.

See the full cost breakdownRoom, care and fees · how people pay · where the price comes from
Room
Daily care
Sharing the room

Memory care is not priced here: a dementia-care designation is not on file for this home. Ask the home.

  • Starting monthly rate$5,500this home

    The home lists this starting rate on Seniorly for assisted living shared bedroom, seen September 9, 2026.

  • Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600

    Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (45 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).

  • One-time move-in fee$2,000one time · likely $0–$4,000

    Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,000 (134 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.

Likely monthly totalLikely $5,500–$6,100
$5,500
First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $5,500–$9,600
$7,500
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
  • Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
  • Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
  • SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
  • VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
  • Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
  • MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
If the money runs out, what Medi-Cal covers
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
  • The care level

    Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.

  • What is billed separately

    Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.

  • Move-in costs

    A one-time community fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.

  • Increases

    California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.

  • What is the full monthly cost for the room and care we need, and what does it include?
  • What would the next care level cost, and who decides when it changes?
  • What is billed separately, and is there a one-time fee or deposit at move-in?
  • Is any private-pay period required before another payment program can begin?
How this estimate worksWhere this price comes from

The home lists this starting rate on Seniorly for assisted living shared bedroom, seen September 9, 2026.

16 homes like this within 3 miles publish starting rates mostly between $5,450–$6,500.

  • Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
  • Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
  • Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
  • Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
  • We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
  • It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Show the 16 nearby homes behind this estimate

Where it is

  • 1136 Vermont Avenue, San Bruno, CA 94066Address from the public record · September 27, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.

Opening the neighborhood map…

The state record

California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. Here are the dated documents and the state’s own words, beside what is typical for homes this size.

Since 2023, the state has filed 6 documents for this home, and its records count 6 visits since 2012. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated July 29, 2026.

On file since
2023
State visits
6
Most recent visit
July 29, 2026
Occupied · March 17, 2025 visit
6 of 6 bedsa count on that day, not an opening

We hold 2 complaint reports the state published for this home, dated September 19, 2024 to March 17, 2025. 2 of the 2 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (1), “Unsubstantiated” (1). 2 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word. Summary composed by computer from the 2 complaint reports below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

Beside homes the same size

  • Type A citations0typical 0
  • Type B citations1typical 0
  • Substantiated allegations1typical 0
  • Total complaints2typical 0

“Typical” is the statewide median across the 6,808 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this licence since 2012.

Year by year
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated2026110202522120242202023110

The last 36 months — 6 of 6 documents

20261 state visit · 1 document
Jul 29, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

On July 29, 2026, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Murial Han conducted an unannounced annual inspection. Upon arrival, LPA met with caregiver, Mila De Villa and explained the purpose of today's visit. The administrator and the assistant administrator arrived shortly thereafter and assisted with the inspection. A tour of the facility was conducted with caregiver. This is a single story facility with 6 bedrooms (1 staff rooms, 4 private rooms and 1 shared rooms), 2 full and 1 half bathroom/shower rooms. Living room, dining area, kitchen and all other areas intended for resident use were observed to be furnished and able to meet the needs of the residents. The indoor and outdoor passageways were free of obstruction. Food supplies were sufficient of 2- days perishables and 7- days of non-perishables. Showers were observed equipped with non-skid mats and grab bars. During the tour of the facility, LPA observed room 5 and the bathroom next to room had a strong urine odor. This observation was also made during the annual inspection last year. Comfortable temperature is maintained and lighting is sufficient for comfort. Bed sheets, linens, and towels were observed to be sufficient and able to meet the needs of the residents at this time. Central storage for medications, sharps and chemicals were observed to be locked and inaccessible to residents in care. Hot water temperature in the bathroom and kitchen was 114- 116 degrees F. Fire extinguisher were checked. Emergency Disaster drills were reviewed to be adequate. A review of (6) resident files was conducted and noted on the LIC 858 and during the file reviews LPA observed R1 has half bedrails without a physician's order and R2 and R3 have bedrails by the bed and the foot of their beds. Based on observation, deficiency is cited under California Code of Regulations, Title, 22 cited on the LIC 809D. Failure to correct the deficiencies may result in civil penalties. This report is reviewed and discussed with the assistant administrator, Amie Flores; A copy of this report and the appeal rights were provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 29, 2026
20252 state visits · 2 documents
Jul 1, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

On July 1, 2025 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Murial Han conducted an unannounced annual inspection. Upon arrival, LPA met with caregiver, Mila De Villa and explained the purpose of today's visit. The administrator and the assistant administrator arrived shortly thereafter and assisted with the inspection. Current census is 5 residents. A tour of the facility was conducted with caregiver. This is a single story facility with 6 bed rooms (1 staff rooms, 4 private rooms and 1 shared rooms). Living room, dining area, kitchen and all other areas intended for resident use were observed to be furnished and able to meet the needs of the residents. The indoor and outdoor passageways were free of obstruction. Food supplies were sufficient of 2- days perishables and 7- days of non-perishables. Showers were observed equipped with non-skid mats and grab bars. LPA observed the bathroom next to R5's room had a strong urine odor. Comfortable temperature is maintained and lighting is sufficient for comfort. Bed sheets, linens, and towels were observed to be sufficient and able to meet the needs of the residents at this time. Central storage for medications, sharps and chemicals were observed to be locked and inaccessible to residents in care. Hot water temperature in the bathroom and kitchen and fire extinguisher were checked. A review of (5) resident files was conducted and noted on the LIC 858. A review of (2) staff files was conducted and noted on the LIC 859. LPA requested for a copy of the control of property to be submitted to CCL 7/2/2025. A civil penalty of $500 is being assessed today for 2 repeat violations that were cited during the annual inspection last year. Based on observation, deficiency is cited under California Code of Regulations, Title, 22 cited on the LIC 809D. Failure to correct the deficiencies may result in additional civil penalties. This report is reviewed and discussed with the administrator/licensee. A copy of this report and the appeal rights were provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 1, 2025
Mar 17, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Licensee did not provide a refund upon resident's death

On March 17, 2025 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Murial Han conducted an unannounced 10-day complaint investigation. LPA met with caregiver, Mila De Villa and explained the purpose of today's visit. Caregiver called and informed manager, Amie Flores of LPA's visit. Regarding to the allegation of- licensee did not provide a refund upon resident's death, the reporting party stated that resident-in-question (R1) passed away on 12/25/2024 and the responsible party has not gotten the refund. During today's visit, LPA interviewed the manager over the phone and she stated that the Licensee's son is handling the refund and he is planning to refund the money this month. LPA reminded the manager that per Title 22, the refund shall be issued within 15 days after the personal property is removed. After the investigation, this allegation is substantiated. Based on interview, during the investigation, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met. Therefore, this allegation was determined to be substantiated. Deficiencies of the California Code of Regulations, Title, 22 cited on the LIC9099-D. Failure to correct the deficiencies may result in civil penalties. Report was discussed with caregiver and a copy is provided with Appeal Rights. Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 17, 2025 · control 14-AS-20250311150516

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: HSC 1569.652(c) · Plan of correction due date: Mar 24, 2025

Health and Safety Code section 1569.652 provides in part:..(c) A refund of any fees paid in advance covering.. within 15 days after the personal property is removed. This requirement is not met as evicenced by based on interivew, R1 passed away on 12/25/24 and the refund has yet been issued which poses a potential health and safety risk with residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 17, 2025

Plan of correction: The administrator/licensee shall review the regulation and provide a statement in writing acknowledging the review and provide a copy of proof that the refund was issued. The administrator/licensee will provide a copy of the proof and the written statement to CCL by 3/25/2025.

20242 state visits · 2 documents
Sep 19, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility staff are not serving food in a safe and healthful manner. Facility staff are not ensuring that incontinent residents are kept clean and dry. Facility staff are withholding fluids to control incontinence. Facility staff are not properly trained resulting in injuries to the resident.

On September 19, 2024 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Murial Han conducted an unannounced visit to delivery the complaint investigation findings. LPA met with caregiver Mila De Villa and explained the purpose of today's visit. Regarding to the allegation of - facility staff are not serving food in a safe and healthful manner, the reporting party stated that the food is being served cold. As part of the investigation, LPA interviewed resident-in-question(R1), other residents and staff. According to R1 and the other residents, they were not being served cold food. They stated that the food is good and one of the residents stated that sometimes the food was served luke warm but it was never cold and staff would heat it up if they requested for it. According to staff, the food was not cold and if the residents wanted it warmer, they would heat it up. After the investigation, this allegation is deemed to be unsubstantiated. Unsubstantiated Regarding to the allegation of facility staff are not ensuring that incontinent residents are kept cleaned, the reporting party stated that resident #1 (R1) is only being changed 2x/day. As part of the investigation, LPA conducted observation, interviewed staff, visiting home health licensed professional, and other residents. During LPA's visit on 8/14/2024, LPA observed R1 who was laying in bed, appeared with bright affect, and cleaned. According to staff, they changed R1 2-3x/day and as needed. They also stated that they checked on R1 several times a day to make sure R1 was cleaned and dry. According to the visiting home health licensed professional, R1 was always cleaned and dry during their visits. The other residents stated that facility staff are cleaning and changing them when needed and sometimes it took a little longer when they were busy. After the investigation, this allegation is deemed to be unsubstantiated. Regarding to the allegation of- facility staff are withholding fluids to control incontinence, the reporting party stated R1 was not being provided with water/fluids and the responsible party has to provided during visits. As part of the investigation, LPA conducted observation, interviewed R1, other residents and staff. During LPA's visit on 8/14/2024, LPA observed R1's water bottles were placed in R1's room and other residents have their water bottles next to their beds as well. According to staff, R1 needed assistance with drinking water so they placed the water bottles in the room and offered it during meals, and through-out the day. The also stated that they would fill-up all the resident's water bottles when needed. LPA interviewed R1 who stated that staff would ensure that he/she has water through-out the day and the other residents also stated that they always have water next to their beds. After the investigation, this allegation is unsubstantiated. Regarding to the allegation of- facility staff are not properly trained resulting in injuries to the resident, the reporting party stated that R1's responsible party noted bruises on R1's fingers and arms. As part of the investigation, LPA reviewed staff training records, R1's medical records, interviewed staff, administrator, and other residents. LPA interviewed the administrator who denied the allegation and stated R1 has been at the facility for several years and the responsible party has not reported that staff was not trained resulting bruises on R1's fingers and arms. In addition, the administrator stated that facility staff members are experienced and trained to care for the residents. LPA interviewed staff member who denied the allegation and stated that they have been caring for R1 for many years and they were familiar with R1's skin condition, medications, daily routines, etc. They stated that R1 is at risk for bruises due to a medication that R1 is taking and has been taking it for many years. LPA interviewed the visiting home health licensed professional who stated that R1 was prone to bruises/skin discoloration due to age and a medication that R1 was taking. The home health licensed professional also stated that based on his/her observation, facility staff members were competent and trained to care for the residents and they were providing good care. LPA interviewed other residents and they stated that staff members were professional, caring and knowledgeable of their jobs. Based on the training records provided by the facility, LPA observed facility staff completed their annual training. Based on R1's Centrally Stored Medication And Destruction Record, LPA observed R1 is taking the medication that was reported by the staff and according to Mayo Clinic, one of the side affects of this medication is bruising or purple areas on the skin. After the investigation, this allegation is deemed to be unsubstantiated. Although the above investigations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. This report is reviewed and discussed with the caregiver, Mila De Villa.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 19, 2024 · control 14-AS-20240813105045
Jul 17, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

On July 17, 2024 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Murial Han conducted an unannounced annual inspection. Upon arrival, LPA met with caregiver, Mila De Villa and explained the purpose of today's visit. The administrator and the assistant administrator arrived shortly thereafter and assisted with the inspection. Current census is 4 residents. A tour of the facility was conducted with caregiver. This is a single story facility with 6 bed rooms (2 staff rooms, 2 private rooms and 2 shared rooms). Living room, dining area, kitchen and all other areas intended for resident use were observed to be furnished and able to meet the needs of the residents. The indoor and outdoor passageways were free of obstruction. Food supplies were sufficient of 2- days perishables and 7- days of non-perishables. Toilet, hand washing and bathing areas were observed clean and in operating condition. Showers were observed equipped with non-skid mats and grab bars. Comfortable temperature is maintained and lighting is sufficient for comfort. Bed sheets, linens, and towels were observed to be sufficient and able to meet the needs of the residents at this time. Central storage for medications, sharps and chemicals were observed to be locked and inaccessible to residents in care. Hot water temperature in the bathroom and kitchen were measured at 105- 115 degrees Fahrenheit. Fire extinguisher was checked. A review of (4) resident files was conducted and noted on the LIC 858. A review of (3) staff files was conducted and noted on the LIC 859. LPA requested for a copy of the Liability Insurance, control of property, and administrator certification to be submitted by 7/18/2024. Based on observation, deficiency is cited under California Code of Regulations, Title, 22 cited on the LIC 809D. Failure to correct the deficiencies may result in civil penalties. . This report is reviewed and discussed with the administrator and the assistant administrator. A copy of this report and the appeal rights were provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 17, 2024
20231 state visit · 1 document
Nov 18, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Unannounced annual visit made out to this facility on 11/18/2023 by Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Charlie Yang who was met by the facility live-in caregivers, Rodrigo Mumanglag and Elma Dajao, who were briefly interviewed at this time. This LPA requested that they go ahead and contact the facility designated Administrator, Dorie Paniza, to inform her that CCL was present at this time for an annual visit. She was unable to be present at today's annual visit but gave consent for her present caregivers to sign all documents at this time. Current census was 6 residents. There was one resident under the care of hospice at this time according to statements made by the facility caregivers. This facility does have an approved hospice waiver to be able to accept and retain up to (2) hospice residents at any given time. Tour of this facility was conducted. A tour of the facility kitchen area was conducted. Drawers and cabinets were opened and the items enclosed were reviewed at this time. Drawers housing knives and sharps were observed to be locked and made inaccessible to the residents at this time. Cleaning agents, bleach, and other supplies were observed to be locked and made inaccessible to the residents at this time. A review of the facility food supply was conducted. A review of the facility's 2-day perishable foods and 7-day nonperishable foods was conducted to make sure that there were sufficient quantities on hand at all times. Medication cabinet, located in the facility staff room, was reviewed. Policies and procedures involving handling, dispensing, and documentation of the resident medications were discussed with the facility staff at this time. A review of the facility Medication Administration Record and dispensing log was conducted. Medication cabinet was observed to be locked and made inaccessible to the residents at this time. Living room, dining area, and all other areas intended for resident use were observed to furnished and maintained in compliance at this time and able to meet the needs of the residents. A tour of the resident bedrooms was conducted. Furniture and furnishings were observed to be sufficient and able to meet the needs of the residents at this time. A tour of the resident restrooms was conducted. Grab bars and non skid mats were observed to be presentand in good repair at this time. Hot water temperatures were taken to make sure that they measured within the allowed range of 105-120 degrees at all times. Laundry area, located in the garage, was observed to be unlocked but did not house any detergents, soaps, or bleach at this time. It was learned that all cleaning and laundry supplies were separately locked and made inaccessible to the residents at all times. Linen closet was reviewed. Bed sheets, linens, and towels were observed to be sufficient and able to meet the needs of the residents at this time. A tour of the garage area was conducted. Additional food storage units were observed to be present and in good repair at this time. Additional nonperishable food supplies were observed to be present along with emergency food supplies as well. First aid kit, located in kitchen area, was observed to be present and contained all of the required components at this time. Fire extinguisher was observed to be placed in the kitchen area at this time. A tour of the exterior grounds for this facility was conducted. A review of the facility perimeter fence, side gates, and exits was conducted. A review of (6) resident files was conducted and noted on the LIC 858. A review of (4) resident staff files was conducted and noted on the LIC 859. The following forms and documents were requested to be updated and submitted into CCL in order to update this facility file: LIC 308 LIC 400 LIC 500 LIC 610 The following deficiencies were observed and cited on the following LIC 809-D pursuant to Title 22 Rules and Regulations, Health and Safety Codes. Appeal Rights were printed and a copy was given to the facility representative at this time. Exit Interviewthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 18, 2023
What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedthere was not enough evidence to prove a violation occurred — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe evidence showed the allegation was false, could not have happened, or had no reasonable basisType A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗

An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents and the questions below stand in their place.

Who holds the licence

Paniza, Dorie & Lamberto, licensed since 2012, operates 2 licensed homes in California. Running more than one home is common and is neither good nor bad on its own.

Life here

Rooms, meals, the rhythm of a day, faith and language, pets and house rules — as the home describes them. Tap any detail for its source and date; nothing here is graded.

The home has not described daily life anywhere we have reviewed yet — that is the case for most small homes, and it says nothing about the home. These questions fill in the picture; keep the ones that matter to you.

Before you call

Ask every home the same questions — the state’s record does not answer these. Keep the ones that matter and they travel with your saved homes.

  1. What is included in the monthly rate, and what costs extra?
  2. Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?
  3. Which rooms does the non-ambulatory approval cover, and what transfer support is provided?
  4. What could change whether someone can stay here?
  5. Can we see a bedroom and share a meal during a visit?

Other homes nearby

The nearest licensed homes in San Mateo County, closest first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.

Explore San Mateo County