Illustration — no photo of this home on file yet

Brio Vista Senior Care

Small home·Licensed for 6·Downey, California

LicensedLicence #198603933
  • Care approvals on fileWheelchair · Dementia · Hospice · BedriddenState licensing record · September 13, 2026
  • Estimated starting rate$5,400 a monthCovelight estimate · likely $4,450–$6,650
  • Home sizeLicensed for 6Small care home · a licensed care home (RCFE)
  • Room at the last state visit6 of 6 beds occupiedJune 27, 2026 · not a current opening
  • Ways to payAsk the homeMedi-Cal ALW participation not on file
  • Last state visitJune 27, 2026CDSS inspection record

Brio Vista Senior Care is a small care home in Downey — a licensed residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE), the licence category behind “assisted living” and “board and care.” It is licensed for 6 residents.

Built from CDSS public records · September 13, 2026. Every fact below names its source and date.

Quick answers and the state record

A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

Quick answers about Brio Vista Senior Care

Is Brio Vista Senior Care licensed?

The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

How many residents is Brio Vista Senior Care licensed for?

6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

Has Brio Vista Senior Care been cited?

0 Type A and 0 Type B citations, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

Is Brio Vista Senior Care still open?

This license was on the CDSS roster as of September 28, 2026.

What does Brio Vista Senior Care cost?

$5,400 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $4,450–$6,650. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 24 small homes within 8 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

Among 228 other homes of a similar licensed size across Los Angeles County that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $4,000 to $6,300 a month, and the middle figure is $5,000 (n = 228 other homes publishing a starting rate).

Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.

A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.

The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.

A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.

Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.

Does Brio Vista Senior Care take Medi-Cal?

On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.

Who holds the license?

The license is held by Brio Vista Senior Care LLC, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

Is there a hospital nearby?

Kaiser Foundation Hospital-Downey is 1.4 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.

Can Brio Vista Senior Care keep a resident on hospice?

Hospice care is approved on this license, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

Brio Vista Senior Care license and inspection record

  • Name on the license: “BRIO VISTA SENIOR CARE”, per the CDSS roster as of June 12, 2026.
  • License #198603933. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • Licensed for 6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • Licensed to Brio Vista Senior Care LLC, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • First licensed: the year is not on file — the roster carries no first-license date for it. Ask: “When did this license start?”
  • 3 state inspection visits on file, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • 0 Type A and 0 Type B citations on file, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • 1 complaint and 0 substantiated allegations on file, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
  • The most recent state visit on file is June 27, 2026, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
Type A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗

See the state’s own record

Can they support the care needed?

California licenses a home for specific kinds of care. The state’s record lists what this home is approved for; the home’s own answers fill in what changes as needs change.

  • Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved · covers up to 5 residents
  • Dementia / memory careApproved by the state
  • Hospice careApproved by the state
  • BedriddenApproved · covers up to 1 resident

State licensing record · September 13, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.

Read the state’s own wording
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. APPROVED FOR SIX (6) RESIDENTS OF WHICH FIVE (5) MAY BE NON-AMBULATORY. FIRE CLEARANCE FOR ONE (1) BEDRIDDEN IN BEDROOM #4. HOSPICE APPROVED FOR THREE (3) RESIDENTS.

983 - RCFE / DEMENTIA

CDSS record, verbatim · September 13, 2026

As needs change

  • Staying through hospice

    Hospice waiver on file — care may continue at the end of life

    Ask: “If hospice is needed, can care continue here until the end?”

    State licensing record · September 13, 2026

  • If memory loss develops

    Dementia-care designation on file

    Ask: “Can we read the dementia care disclosure and discuss how daily support works?”

    State licensing record · September 13, 2026

3 more questions to ask the home
  • Two-person transfers or a lift

    Not on file

    Ask: “If two people or a lift are needed to transfer, can the person stay?”

  • Someone awake overnight

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?”

  • Medicines

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who manages the medicines, and what happens when a dose is missed?”

What it costs here

Covelight estimate

$5,400a month to start

Likely $4,450–$6,650

From 24 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file

Likely monthly total

$5,400a month

Likely $4,450–$6,800

With a shared room and basic help.

An estimate for planning, not a quote. The price is made in the phone call.

See the full cost breakdownRoom, care and fees · how people pay · how this estimate works
Room
Daily care
Sharing the room
  • Starting monthly rate$5,400likely $4,450–$6,650

    Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 24 small homes within 8 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

  • Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600

    Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (45 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).

  • One-time move-in fee$2,000one time · likely $0–$4,000

    Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,000 (134 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.

Likely monthly totalLikely $4,450–$6,800
$5,400
First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $5,150–$9,850
$7,400
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
  • Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
  • Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
  • SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
  • VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
  • Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
  • MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
If the money runs out, what Medi-Cal covers
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
  • The care level

    Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.

  • What is billed separately

    Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.

  • Move-in costs

    A one-time community fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.

  • Increases

    California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.

  • What is the full monthly cost for the room and care we need, and what does it include?
  • What would the next care level cost, and who decides when it changes?
  • What is billed separately, and is there a one-time fee or deposit at move-in?
  • Is any private-pay period required before another payment program can begin?
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 24 small homes within 8 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

24 homes like this within 8 miles publish starting rates mostly between $4,000–$6,000.

  • Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
  • Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
  • Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
  • Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
  • We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
  • It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Show the 24 nearby homes behind this estimate

Where it is

  • 13623 Dempster Avenue, Downey, CA 90242Address from the public record · September 13, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.

Opening the neighborhood map…

The state record

California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. Here are the dated documents and the state’s own words, beside what is typical for homes this size.

Since 2025, the state has filed 3 documents for this home, and its records count 3 visits. The most recent — a complaint investigation report on June 27, 2026 — closed with the state’s outcome word: “Unsubstantiated.”

On file since
2025
State visits
3
Most recent visit
June 27, 2026
Occupied at that visit
6 of 6 bedsa count on that day, not an opening

We hold 1 complaint report the state published for this home, dated June 27, 2026. 1 of the 1 carries the state's recorded outcome word: “Unsubstantiated” (1). 1 includes the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word. Summary composed by computer from the 1 complaint report below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

Beside homes the same size

  • Type A citations0typical 0
  • Type B citations0typical 0
  • Substantiated allegations0typical 0
  • Total complaints1typical 0

“Typical” is the statewide median across the 6,808 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations.

Year by year
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated20261202025110

The last 36 months — 3 of 3 documents

20261 state visit · 2 documents
Jun 27, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff do not provide adequate supervision resulting in residents sustaining multiple falls. Staff do not seek medical attention to residents in a timely manner. Staff does not ensure residents' showering needs are being met. Staff does not ensure incidents are being reported. Staff does not ensure facility has adeuqate food supply. Staff does not ensure facility has adequate cleaning supplies. Staff does not ensure resident has adequate diaper supplies. Staff are utilizing video suerveillance cameras with audio.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Gabriela Castro conducted an unannounced complaint visit on 06/27/2026 to deliver findings related to the above allegations. LPA was greeted by facility staff and Administrator Brook Taylor and explained the purpose of the visit. The investigation included a review of the client roster, staff roster, residents' face sheets, residents' Physician's Reports, Admission Agreements, maintenance logs, grocery logs, the facility's operational manual, and Special Incident Reports (SIRs). In addition, the LPA toured the facility and conducted interviews with five (5) staff members (S1–S5) and three (3) residents (R1–R3). (continued on 9099C) Unsubstantiated Allegation: Staff do not provide adequate supervision resulting in residents sustaining multiple falls. It is alleged that staff do not provide adequate supervision, resulting in residents sustaining multiple falls. During staff interviews, staff reported that residents who are at risk for falls receive supervision based on their individual needs. Staff stated that residents requiring increased assistance due to mobility limitations or changes in condition receive additional supervision. Staff further reported that residents identified as being at risk of getting out of bed unassisted have bed sensor alarms in place to alert staff when the resident attempts to get out of bed, allowing staff to respond promptly. Staff also reported that residents are assessed following a fall, and appropriate action is taken based on the resident's condition. While one staff member reported that there had previously been only one caregiver assigned during some night shifts, staff generally reported that current staffing levels are sufficient to meet residents' supervision needs. During the facility walkthrough, the LPA observed bed sensor alarms installed on the beds of residents identified as being at risk for falls or attempting to get out of bed unassisted. During resident interviews, residents reported feeling safe and stated that staff provide assistance when needed. Residents did not express concerns regarding staff supervision or report that inadequate supervision contributed to falls. Allegation: Staff do not seek medical attention to residents in a timely manner. It was alleged that staff do not seek medical attention for residents in a timely manner. During staff interviews, staff reported that residents are assessed immediately following a fall or medical incident and that 911 is called when a resident requires emergency medical attention. Staff stated they have not been instructed to delay or avoid seeking medical care. Review of the facility's Medical Emergency Procedures confirmed that staff are instructed to call 911 when appropriate and notify the administrator and the resident's responsible party. During resident interviews, residents reported that staff respond promptly when assistance is needed and did not express concerns regarding delays in receiving medical attention. Allegation: Staff does not ensure incidents are being reported. It was alleged that staff do not ensure resident incidents are properly documented and reported to responsible parties. During staff interviews, staff reported that resident incidents are communicated to the Administrator and documented in the facility's electronic charting system and staff communication logs. Staff stated that the administrator is generally responsible for notifying responsible parties and Licensing, and that responsible parties are contacted following resident incidents or changes in condition. Staff also reported that they may contact family members directly when concerns arise. No staff reported being aware of incidents that were intentionally left undocumented or unreported. During record review, Administrator provided documentation demonstrating that incident reports had been submitted to Licensing and responsible parties were notified. (continued on 9099C) Allegation: Staff does not ensure residents' showering needs are being met. It is alleged that staff do not ensure residents' showering and personal hygiene needs are being met. During staff interviews, staff reported that residents who require assistance with bathing receive showers according to their individualized schedules, while residents who are independent shower on their own. Staff stated that bathing assistance and resident refusals are documented in the facility's electronic charting system. Staff consistently reported that staffing levels have not prevented residents from receiving showers as scheduled, although some residents occasionally refuse bathing. During resident interviews, residents generally reported that their personal care and hygiene needs are being met. Residents indicated that they receive assistance from staff when needed and expressed satisfaction with the care provided. Residents who required assistance with bathing reported that staff provide support, while residents who are independent stated that they manage their own personal hygiene. Residents interviewed did not express concerns regarding access to showers, bathing assistance, or personal hygiene care. Several residents stated that they feel well cared for and supported by staff. Allegation: Staff does not ensure facility has adequate food supply. It was alleged that staff do not ensure the facility maintains an adequate food supply to meet residents' needs. During staff interviews, staff generally reported that the facility maintains an adequate food supply. Staff stated that groceries are purchased regularly and replenished when supplies run low. Staff also reported that if a specific food item is unavailable, substitute items are provided. One staff member expressed concerns that certain perishable items were occasionally unavailable. During resident interviews, residents generally reported that they receive enough food and did not express concerns regarding food availability. One resident stated that food supplies occasionally become low; however, food remained available and substitute items were provided. During the facility walkthrough, LPA observed an adequate supply of refrigerated, frozen, canned, and dry food items available for resident use. Allegations: Staff does not ensure facility has adequate cleaning supplies and Staff does not ensure resident has adequate diaper supplies. It was alleged that staff do not ensure the facility maintains an adequate supply of cleaning products necessary to maintain a sanitary environment. It was further alleged that staff do not ensure residents have an adequate supply of incontinent products, including diapers, as needed. During staff interviews, staff consistently reported that the facility maintains adequate cleaning supplies and incontinence products. Staff stated that supplies are monitored, and the administrator is notified when items begin to run low so they can be reordered. Staff reported that they have not observed the facility run out of cleaning supplies or diapers. (continued on 9099C) continued Allegations: Staff does not ensure facility has adequate cleaning supplies and Staff does not ensure resident has adequate diaper supplies. Although supplies may occasionally become low, they are replenished promptly. Staff also stated that residents who require incontinent products receive the necessary supplies, and some family members occasionally provide additional personal items for their relatives. During the facility walkthrough, LPA observed an adequate supply of cleaning products throughout the facility. LPA also observed plenty of diapers and other incontinence products available for residents. Overall, the facility maintained sufficient resident care supplies to meet residents' needs at the time of the visit. Allegation: Staff are utilizing video surveillance cameras with audio. During staff interviews, staff reported that surveillance cameras are located throughout the facility, including common areas such as the living room, kitchen, hallways, and exterior areas. Some staff believed the cameras had audio recording capabilities, while others were unsure whether audio was being recorded. Staff reported that the facility utilizes Ring cameras and stated that the audio function has been turned off. Staff indicated that the cameras are primarily used to monitor common areas and promote resident safety. LPA's investigation did not reveal evidence that the facility's surveillance cameras were actively recording audio. Based on the investigation conducted, which included interviews with staff and residents, as well as a review of relevant records, there was insufficient evidence to support the reported allegations. Although the allegations may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED. Exit interview was held, and a copy of this report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 27, 2026 · control 28-AS-20260605104904
Jun 27, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Deficiencies

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Gabriela Castro conducted a Case Management visit in conjunction with Complaint Control Number: 28-AS-20260605104904. During today's visit, LPA was met with facility staff and explained the purpose of the visit. Administrator Brooke Taylor arrived shortly thereafter. During the course of the investigation related to Complaint Control Number: 28-AS-20260605104904, it was determined that on 06/11/2026, during a facility walk through, LPA observed a video surveillance camera located in R5's shared bedroom. LPA inquired about the presence of the camera, and the Administrator stated that it had been installed at the request of R5’s family member. LPA asked whether the Administrator had consulted with Community Care Licensing (CCL) prior to allowing the camera to be installed in a shared bedroom. The Administrator stated that no consultation with the Department had occurred. During the visit, following discussion with the LPA, the Administrator immediately removed the camera from the shared bedroom. Based on LPA's observation and the Administrator's statements, the facility failed to ensure the personal rights of R5 and the roommate by permitting a video surveillance camera to be installed in a shared bedroom without prior consultation with the Department and without documented consent from all affected residents or their authorized representatives. This constitutes a violation of residents' Personal Rights. An exit interview was conducted with Brooke Taylor, Administrator/Licensee. During the facility walk through, deficiencies were observed and cited on the attached LIC 809D/809C in accordance with Title 22, Division 6 regulations. A copy of this report, LIC 809D/809C, and appeal rights will be providedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 27, 2026

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 80072(a)(2) · Plan of correction due date: Jul 10, 2026

(a) Except for children’s residential facilities, each client shall have personal rights which include, but are not limited to, the following: (2) To be accorded safe, healthful and comfortable accommodations, furnishings and equipment to meet his/her needs. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on observation and interviews facility did not comply with the cited section, as the facility had a surveillance camera placed in a residents shared room which poses/posed an immediate health, safety, or personal rights risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 27, 2026

Plan of correction: Licensee shall immediately ensure that no video surveillance cameras are installed in resident bedrooms without prior Department approval.In addition, the Licensee shall provide documentation that all staff have been trained on residents' personal rights, privacy requirements, and the facility's policy regarding video surveillance. The written plan and proof of staff training shall be submitted to LPA by the POC due date.

20251 state visit · 1 document
Oct 9, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Prelicensing

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Christian Gutierrez conducted a pre-licensing visit. LPA met with applicants Edgar Sanchez and Brooke Taylor. An initial application was submitted to Community Care Licensing Department (CCLD) for a Residential Care Facility for the Elderly RCFE to serve six (6) elderly residents, of which five (5) may be non-ambulatory. Fire clearance granted for one (1) bedridden in bedroom #4. Hospice approved for three (3) residents. This property has never been licensed. The physical plant was toured with the applicants. The facility is in a residential area and is a one-story family home. There are four (4) residents’ bedrooms, two (2) bathrooms, living room, dining room, kitchen, activity room, front yard, back yard, and garage. LPA conducted the tour and observed the following: Smoke detectors/carbon monoxide detectors were observed in common areas and in each resident’s bedroom. Residents’ bedrooms were observed to have required furniture such as bed frames, dressers, chairs, lamps, and sufficient closet space. The required bedding was also observed. The home has two (2) bathrooms and were clean and sanitary. The water temperate was tested and measured at 105.3 and 105.6 degrees, which is within the required 105-120 degrees. There are three fire extinguishers in hallway, activity room, and garage. All appliances in kitchen were observed to be clean and operational. The sharp knives are located in the kitchen cabinet that is inaccessible to residents. Cleaning supplies and chemicals are stored in a locked cabinet in kitchen. Medications will be locked in a closet in living room. All files will be kept in file cabinet in office. The garage will be used to store locked chemicals, hygiene supplies, food backup generator and washer/dryer. The backyard has a shaded area with patio furniture. The home does not have a pool or any large bodies of water. No records were reviewed since the home has never been licensed. Per California Code of Regulations, Title 22, the facility meets the physical plant requirements. Component III was conducted. Exit interview held and a copy of the report was provided to applicant.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 9, 2025

The state marks this report as 5 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 2. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedthere was not enough evidence to prove a violation occurred — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe evidence showed the allegation was false, could not have happened, or had no reasonable basisType A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗

An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents and the questions below stand in their place.

Life here

Rooms, meals, the rhythm of a day, faith and language, pets and house rules — as the home describes them. Tap any detail for its source and date; nothing here is graded.

The home has not described daily life anywhere we have reviewed yet — that is the case for most small homes, and it says nothing about the home. These questions fill in the picture; keep the ones that matter to you.

Before you call

Ask every home the same questions — the state’s record does not answer these. Keep the ones that matter and they travel with your saved homes.

  1. What is included in the monthly rate, and what costs extra?
  2. Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?
  3. Which rooms does the non-ambulatory approval cover, and what transfer support is provided?
  4. What could change whether someone can stay here?
  5. Can we see a bedroom and share a meal during a visit?

Other homes nearby

The nearest licensed homes in Los Angeles County, closest first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.

Explore Los Angeles County