Small home · Licensed for 4 · South San Francisco
Arbor House
330 Arbor Drive, South San Francisco, CA 94080Licensed since 2021
Overview
No openings reported
- Approved by the state: WheelchairState licensing record · October 26, 2026
- Licensed for 4: a small care homeThe state license record
Ask this home
Free for families. A home gets your number only if you say yes.
Care and support
- Wheelchairup to 3 residents
Not on file: dementia, hospice and bedridden approvals.
Approved by the state · State licensing record · October 26, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.
Read the state’s own wording
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 3 NON-AMBULATORY
935 - ELDERLY
CDSS record, verbatim · October 26, 2026
As needs change
We’ll ask for you. Not on file for Arbor House: two-person transfers or a lift, who is awake overnight, help with medicines, staying through hospice and care if memory loss develops. When we check availability, we ask about these too.
Check availabilityWhat it costs here
Covelight estimate
$5,400a month to start
Likely $4,400–$6,650
From 17 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file
Monthly cost breakdownWith a shared room and basic help · room, care and fees$5,400likely a month
Memory care is not priced here: a dementia-care designation is not on file for this home. Ask the home.
Starting monthly rate$5,400likely $4,400–$6,650
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 17 small homes and similar homes within 3 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600
Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (44 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).
One-time move-in fee$2,500one time · likely $0–$4,000
Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,500 (133 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.
- Likely monthly totalLikely $4,400–$6,800
- $5,400
- First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $5,200–$9,950
- $7,900
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
- MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
- Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
- Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated October 1, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
- SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
- VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
- Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
Rates at nearby homes17 nearby homes publish starting rates of $4,000 to $6,500
17 homes like this within 3 miles publish starting rates mostly between $4,750–$6,400.
- Bel Amor IIISouth San Francisco · 0.3 mi · Small home$6,000Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- TLC Home CareSouth San Francisco · 0.7 mi · Small home$5,750Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Heirloom Rose GardenSouth San Francisco · 0.8 mi · Small home$5,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living studio · seen September 9, 2026
- Mccaffrey's Care HomeSouth San Francisco · 0.8 mi · Small home$4,500Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Heirloom Gardens of Daly CityDaly City · 1.1 mi · Small home$6,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
- PRN Care HomeDaly City · 1.1 mi · Mid-size home$4,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Delia's Retirement HomeSouth San Francisco · 1.1 mi · Small home$5,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Damenik's HomeSouth San Francisco · 1.2 mi · Mid-size home$6,500Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Family Affair Care HomeSan Bruno · 1.4 mi · Mid-size home$6,000Listed on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026
- Bougainvilleas Care HomeSouth San Francisco · 1.4 mi · Mid-size home$5,750Listed on Seniorly · assisted living · seen September 9, 2026
- Westborough Manor 6San Bruno · 1.8 mi · Small home$6,500Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Access Care CenterSan Bruno · 1.8 mi · Small home$5,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Home at CrestmoorSan Bruno · 1.9 mi · Small home$5,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Araville Residential Care Home IISan Bruno · 2.1 mi · Small home$5,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- San Bruno Care HomeSan Bruno · 2.6 mi · Small home$5,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living studio · seen September 9, 2026
- Ahau Boarding Care HomeSan Bruno · 2.6 mi · Small home$5,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Anamarie Care HomeDaly City · 2.9 mi · Small home$4,800Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 17 small homes and similar homes within 3 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
- Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
- Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
- Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
- Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
- We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
- It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
- The care level
Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.
- What is billed separately
Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.
- Move-in costs
A one-time move-in fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.
- Increases
California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.
An estimate for planning, not a quote. A home sets the price after hearing about the care needed.
Daily life
Daily life here is not on file yet. Most small homes haven’t published it, and that says nothing about the home.
The best way to see it is a visit.
Request a tourWhere it is
330 Arbor Drive, South San Francisco, CA 94080Address from the public record · October 26, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.
Opening the neighborhood map…
- Kaiser Foundation Hospital - South San FranciscoHospital · General acute care, on the state’s list0.8 mi
Straight-line distances; check the drive or the walk. Hospital: the nearest general acute care hospital on the state’s list (CDPH, September 16, 2026).
Open directionsThe state record
California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.
CDSS public record, read October 26, 2026 · License #415601122 · See the state’s own record
The last 36 months — 7 of 20 documents
20261 state visit · 1 document
Feb 27, 2026Facility evaluation reportCase Management - OtherReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Other
On 2/27/2026, LPA Grace Donato conducted an unannounced Case Management-Other visit. LPA met with House Manager Veronica Rozario and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA delivered an immediate exclusion letter for a staff member who is currently associated in the facility. The letter was given to and reviewed by the House Manager. This report is reviewed and discussed, and a copy is provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 27, 2026
20253 state visits · 3 documents
Nov 14, 2025Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
On 11/14/2025, LPA Yi Sam Jian made an unannounced annual visit to the facility. LPA met with staff, Veronica Rozario. The licensee, Victoria Alejandro, was contacted by phone to obtain permission for staff to sign the report. LPA explained the purpose of the visit. LPA toured the facility inside and outside including all of resident rooms, garage/laundry area, and kitchen area. All outdoor and indoor passageway were free and clear of obstruction. No accessible bodies of water or fire safety hazards observed. Kitchen was inspected, sufficient supply of food observed. Medications, toxins and sharps stored appropriately and inaccessible to clients, a comfortable temperature was maintained, hot water temperature inspected to be compliant, furnishing and lighting was sufficient for comfort and safety. Carbon monoxide detector and smoke detector system inspected and met the requirements. fire extinguisher checked and fully charged. Facility has a written emergency disaster plan. Licensee has at least one completed first aid kit. Facility has an updated log for emergency drill are done every month. A technical violation was noted due to the facility’s ongoing process of securing signatures for the reappraisal. No deficiencies are cited at this time. Report is reviewed with staff and a copy is provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 14, 2025
The state marks this report as 3 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 2. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.
Apr 19, 2025Facility evaluation reportCase Management - Health ChecksReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Health Checks
On 4/19/2025, LPA Grace Donato conducted an unannounced case management-health checks visit. LPA met with House Manager (HM), Veronica Rozario and explained the purpose of the visit. This visit is to conduct health and safety check after the facility had to evacuate due to foul odor emitting from the bathroom. LPA toured the facility and observed that the bathroom tiles have been replaced due to it being torn to fix the leaking pipes under. There is no more odor emitting from the entrance of the bathroom. LPA took photos of the fixed bathroom and requested the before images taken by HM. Residents will be checking out of the hotel today at 11 am and move back to the facility. LPA requested work orders and permits and other documentation. LPA also requested and updated Emergency Disaster Plan. No deficiencies cited today. Report is reviewed and copy is provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 19, 2025
Apr 14, 2025Facility evaluation reportCollateralReport on file
Type of visit: Collateral
On 4/14/2025, LPA Grace Donato conducted an unannounced collateral visit at Embassy Suites located in Burlingame, CA. LPA met with House Manager (HM), Veronica Rozario and explained the purpose of the visit. This visit is in response to emergency relocation due to ongoing bathroom repair in the facility because of bathroom pipes emitting foul odor. During the visit at the hotel, LPA observed 4 hotel rooms housing 1 client in each room. Clients rooms were observed with clients' personal belongings, water, snacks, bathroom, towels, bed. Clients are currently having breakfast at the lobby and will go out for day program. No staff members will be sleeping in the clients' rooms as all staff are wake-staff. HM indicated they will provide breakfast to clients; cereal, fruits and eggs with milk, coffee or juice and for lunch and dinner they will have take-out. According to HM, the tentative check out date from the hotel is on 4/16/2025 and might be extended depending on the ongoing repairs. HM will notify LPA before clients will be moved back to the facility. No citations are issued during the visit. Report is reviewed and a copy is provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 14, 2025
20241 state visit · 1 document
Dec 3, 2024Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
On 12/3/23, LPA Grace Donato made an unannounced annual visit to the facility. LPA met with Administrator Nilda Alpon, House Manager Veronica Rozario, Licensee Victoria Alejandro. LPA explained the purpose of the visit. LPA toured the facility inside and outside including all of resident rooms, garage/laundry area, and kitchen area. LPA observed all residents to have left for community outing. While touring the facility it was observed that the room temperature was at 69 deg F. Hot water was also tested in the bathrooms and the temperature was 118 deg F. The facility is observed to be clean, odorless, and well maintained. Residents bedrooms were observed to be well organized and fully furnished with adequate lighting. Sharps and toxic materials were observed locked in a cabinet. Food supply was observed with an adequate two day perishable and seven day non-perishable. Carbon monoxide/smoke detectors, and fire extinguisher were present throughout the facility. Facility has an updated log for emergency drill are done every month. Four resident records and four staff records were reviewed. Resident’s PNI money was counted and all accounted for. Centrally stored medication was locked in the medicine cart and inaccessible by residents. All medication was labeled and sorted by resident name. All medication logs are complete and updated. LPA requested licensee to submit the following: LIC 500 Personnel Report, Liability Insurance. No deficiencies are cited at this time. Report is reviewed with licensee and a copy is providedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 3, 2024
20232 state visits · 2 documents
Dec 22, 2023Facility evaluation reportCollateralReport on file
Type of visit: Collateral
On this day, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jaime Vado conducted an unannounced collateral visit in order to deliver documents related to a substantiated complaint allegation; complaint number 14-AS-20230223154313 for Cypress Home #415601119, which is the sister facility of Arbor House. Cypress Home is currently closed with no residents in care. LPA met with administrator Nilda Alpon and explained the purpose of today's visit. LPA delivered the documents to Nilda Alpon. No citations issued. Report is reviewed with Nilda.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 22, 2023
Dec 12, 2023Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
On 12/12/23, LPA Grace Donato made an unannounced annual visit to the facility. LPA met with Administrator Nilda Alpon, House Manager Veronica Rozario, Licensee Victoria Alejandro. LPA explained the purpose of the visit. LPA toured the facility inside and outside including all of resident rooms, garage/laundry area, and kitchen area. LPA observed all residents to have left for Adult Day Program. While touring the facility it was observed that the room temperature was at 67 deg F. Hot water was also tested in the bathrooms and the temperature was 118 deg F. The facility is observed to be clean, odorless, and well maintained. Residents bedrooms were observed to be well organized and fully furnished with adequate lighting. Sharps and toxic materials were observed locked in a cabinet in the garage area and inaccessible to residents. Food supply was observed with an adequate two day perishable and seven day non-perishable. Carbon monoxide/ smoke detectors, and fire extinguisher were present throughout the facility. Facility has an updated log for emergency drill are done every month. Three resident records and three staff records were reviewed. Resident’s PNI money was counted and all accounted for with proper log. Staff have criminal record and fingerprint clearances, First Aid/CPR certifications on file. Resident records were reviewed and were observed to be complete with documents such as Admission Agreements, Medical Assessments, and Needs and Service Plans. Centrally stored medication was locked in the medicine cart and inaccessible by residents. All medication was labeled and sorted by resident name. All medication logs are complete and updated. LPA requested licensee to submit the following: LIC 500 Personnel Report, Liability Insurance. No deficiencies are cited at this time. Report is reviewed with licensee and a copy is providedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 12, 2023
Earlier years2021 to 2023 · 13 documents
20235 state visits · 5 documents
Sep 13, 2023Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated
Allegation investigated: - Facility staff are drinking alcohol at the facility
On this day Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jaime Vado conducted an unannounced complaint investigation visit in order to deliver findings into the allegations received. LPA met with administrator Victoria Alejandro and explained the purpose of today's visit. During the course of the investigation LPA conducted interviews and made observations. Interviews conducted revealed that the above allegation did take place. This discovery was made by a facility manager who made a late night visit to the facility around 10:45pm and discovered the staff persons S2, S3, and S4 in the garage of the facility playing loud music and observing a bottle of alcohol and cups present. These staff persons and other staff persons employed at this time were terminated, or resigned, for not reporting these items to the administrator. This allegation is substantiated. Based on LPA interviews and items letters received, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6, are being cited on the attached LIC9099D. Report is reviewed with the administrator Victoria Alejandro. Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 13, 2023 · control 14-AS-20221209144007
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87468.1(a)(2) · Plan of correction due date: Sep 14, 2023
Personal Rights of Residents in All Facilities - (a) Residents in all residential care facilities for the elderly shall have all of the following personal rights: (2)To be accorded safe, healthful and comfortable accommodations, furnishings and equipment. This regulation has not been met as evidenced by: According to interviews S1 discovered during a night time unannounced visit to the facility 3 staff persons, S2, S3, and S4 in the garage of the facility with alcohol, cups, and music playing.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 13, 2023
Plan of correction: Facility terminated S2, S3, and S4 shorty after the incident occurred. In-service training to be conducted regarding staff conduct policies and reporting of incidents among staff. A sign in sheet and materials are to be submitted to the Department to show the trainings took place.
Aug 28, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Administrator is not present on the premises a sufficient number of hours to manage the facility
On 8/28/2023, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Grace Donato Grace Donato conducted an unannounced 10-day complaint inspection. LPA Donato met with Administrator, Victoria Alejandro. LPA Donato explained the purpose of the visit. Regarding the allegation that Administrator (S1) is not present on the premises with a sufficient number of hours to manage the facility. Reporting party (RP) stated that S1 is not present to provide adequate attention to the management and administration of the facility. LPA conducted interviews and reviewed documents regarding S1 and the allegations. Two out of two staff members interviewed stated that administrator works at facility and sometimes covers other caregivers who would call out. Interviews confirm that S1 comes to the facility to help manage and do admin work. Based on documents provided, while S1 may not be on the premises there is a designated responsible person who oversees the facility. This allegation is unsubstantiated. Unsubstantiated Based on these observations, interviews & record reviews, the above allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED. Although the allegations may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the above allegations are unsubstantiated at this time. Report discussed with administrator and a copy is provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 28, 2023 · control 14-AS-20230821141221
Jul 6, 2023Facility evaluation reportCase Management - IncidentDeficiency page: Type A
Type of visit: Case Management - Incident
On 7/6/2023, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Grace Donato conducted a case management visit concerning an incident report received. LPA met with Lead Staff (LS) Veronica Rozario. LPA explained the purpose of today's visit. On 7/5/2023, facility submitted an incident report concerning resident a resident (R1) was given a wrong medication. During today's visit, LPA observed medications to be locked and inaccessible to residents. Residents were at the living room watching a movie. In regard to the incident, LS stated that on the day the incident occurred, the staff (S1) was on NOC shift. S1 was giving out medication in the morning and accidentally gave the wrong set of medication to R1. R1 already ingested the medication so S1 called administrator to report and then poison control was called for advice. S1 is currently not allowed to give out medications. S1 has medication training. Facility staff members will have training again in regard to resident medications. Deficiency is cited today as the facility did not ensure that correct medications is given to residents. Deficiency is cited under California Code of Regulations, Title, 22 cited on the LIC 809D. Failure to correct the deficiencies may result in civil penalties. Report was discussed with lead staff, Veronica Rozario. A copy of this report and the Appeal Rights are provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 6, 2023
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87411(d)(4) · Plan of correction due date: Jul 7, 2023
87411 Personnel Requirements – General (d) All personnel shall be given on the job training or have related experience in the job assigned to them. This training and/or related experience shall provide knowledge of and skill in the following, as appropriate for the job assigned and as evidenced by safe and effective job performance: (4) Knowledge required to safely assist with prescribed medications which are self-administered. This requirement was not met as evidenced by caregiver did not ensure that the correct medication is given to the resident.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 6, 2023
Plan of correction: The licensee and/or administrator will review the regulation, develop a plan to ensure this incident does not happen again. The plan needs to include on how to make sure that correct medication is given to residents. In addition, the plan needs to include staff training. The administrator/licensee will provide a copy of such plan and a sign-in record of staff training to CCL by 7/7/2023.
Jun 30, 2023Facility evaluation reportCollateralReport on file
Type of visit: Collateral
On this day Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jaime Vado conducted a collateral visit at this facility in order to deliver findings for another facility, Cypress Home #415601119 due to Cypress being in a fire an inaccessible at this time. LPA Vado discussed with the administrator of Cypress Virctoria Alejandro the allegation findings via telephone. LPA met with facility manager Veroncia Rozario and explained the purpose of today's visit. LPA Vado discussed and delivered findings to Veroniza Rozario on this day. No citation issued. Report discussed with Veronica.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 30, 2023
Mar 13, 2023Facility evaluation reportCase Management - OtherReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Other
On March 13, 2023, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Komal Charitra conducted an unannounced case management visit. LPA met with Administrator, Victoria Alejandro and explained the purpose of the visit. The purpose of today's visit is to deliver an immediate exclusion letter to exclude an employee of the facility. The letter was given to the Administrator. This report is reviewed and discussed with the Administrator and a copy is provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 13, 2023
20226 state visits · 7 documents
Nov 18, 2022Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Victoria Bertozzi arrived unannounced to conduct an Annual Required inspection and was greeted by staff. Administrator Victoria Alejandro arrived later. The inspection is focused on the Infection Control procedures and practices of this facility. LPA was screened for Covid-19 by staff including having temperature checked and filling out a questionnaire with standard Covid-19 screening questions. LPA initiated a walk-through of the facility around 1:30pm and observed the following: Facility has COVID-19 posters throughout that include hand washing signs in bathrooms. Facility was a comfortable temperature and exits were free from obstructions. Hand sanitizer is located throughout common areas of the facility. Observed staff had masks on during this visit. Commonly touched surfaces are disinfected two times per day. Facility maintains documentation of staff and resident daily temperatures. Facility has a designated visitation area outside and is allowing for visitation in resident rooms per CCL guidance. Staff continue to receive training on infection control and donning and doffing of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) but have not been N95 fit tested. Administrator and LPA discussed visitation and activities. Facility has more than a 30 day supply of PPE including but not limited to masks, gowns, and hand sanitizer. Facility maintains a 30 day supply of medication. Fire extinguishers were last serviced May 2021. Facility has combination hardwired smoke and carbon monoxide detectors that were tested and operational during inspection. Continued on LIC809C Continued from LIC809 Administrator and LPA discussed their Emergency Disaster Plan, Mitigation Plan and Infection Control Plan. Licensee/Administrator to submit updates of the following documents by 12/16/2022: LIC 308 Designated Administrator (if applicable) LIC 500 Personnel Summary LIC 610 Emergency Disaster Plan (review and update) Copy of Liability Insurance No deficiencies cited during this inspection.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 18, 2022
The state marks this report as 3 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 2. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.
Oct 20, 2022Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Facility not following program designed
On October 20, 2022, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Komal Charitra conducted an unannounced complaint visit to deliver findings for the above allegation. LPA met with Caregiver, Arthur Grace and explained the purpose of the visit. Regarding the allegation that the facility is not following program design, according to the reporting party, there are 3 residents that are required to have a 1 on 1 caregiver for all 3 shifts according to the program design. During the investigation, LPA reviewed the facility program design and interviewed staff. Based on the program design that the facility submitted and got approved, the facility indicated that 1:1 staffing will be provided during most waking hours and two staff providing awake supervision and care during sleeping hours. On 9/8/2022 and 10/20/2022, LPA Charitra conducted complaint visits to the facility in the morning and observed 2 staff members present both times for the 3 residents. In addition, interviewed staff indicated there are normally 2 staff members present during the AM shift, 2 staff present during the PM shift and 2 staff during NOC shift. Although, the Administrator is constantly hiring staff members for the facility to meet resident's needs and progrm designed, the Licensee failed to follow the program design in order to meet the resident’s care and supervision. Based on the observations and interviews conducted, it was determined facility is not following program designed. The preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation is determined to be Substantiated. Deficiency of the Residential Care Elderly California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6 is observed and cited on a LIC 9099D. Failure to correct the deficiencies may result in civil penalties. Report is reviewed with Caregiver, Arthur Grace, and a copy is provided with appeals rights. Caregiver refused to sign. Substantiated Regarding the allegation that unqualified staff are providing medications to residents without proper training, according to the reporting party, during interview with reporting party, it was indicated that unqualified staff are providing residents with medication without DSP (direct support professional) training. During the complaint investigation, LPA Charitra interviewed staff members, reviewed staff training records, and reviewed resident medication records and it was indicated that all staff who provide resident's medications are observed to have their DSP training. Based on the interviews conducted, records reviewed, and information collected, the allegation that unqualified staff are providing medications to residents without proper training is UNSUBSTANTIATED, meaning that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is no preponderance of evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred. Report is reviewed with Caregiver, Arthur Grace and a copy is provided with appeals rights. Caregiver refused to sign.nthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 20, 2022 · control 14-AS-20220609161732
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87208(a) · Plan of correction due date: Oct 27, 2022
Plan of operation: Each facility shall have and maintain a current, written definitive plan of operation... Any significant changes in the plan of operation which would affect the services to residents shall be submitted to the licensing agency for approval… The plan and related materials shall contain the following…Statement of purposes and program goals…Administrative organization, Staffing plan, qualifications, and duties. Plan for training staff, as required by Section 87411(c). Violation of this regulation is evidenced by: Based on observations, LPA visited the facility on 9/8/2022 and 10/20/2022 and observed 2 staff members present during the AM shift. In addition, interviewed staff indicated there are normally 2 staff members present during the AM shift.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 20, 2022
Plan of correction: Facility Administrator/Licensee is constantly working on hiring staff members to meet program designed. Administrator will submit LPA a written plan on how facility can meet program designed
Jun 30, 2022Facility evaluation reportPOCReport on file
Type of visit: POC
On June 30, 2022, Licensing Program Analysts (LPA) Komal Charitra and Kevin Varilla conducted an unannounced plan of correction (POC) visit to verify and to confirm that the facility is in compliance with the citation that was issued on 6/16/22. LPA Charitra and LPA Varilla met with House Manager, Homer Bautista, and explained the purpose of the visit. On 6/16/2022, the facility was cited for California Code of Regulation (CCR), 87203 Fire Safety. The plan of correction for this citation was due to CCLD by 6/17/2022. On June 30, 2022, LPAs reviewed and verified the plan of correction documents that were provided by the facility and cleared the citation. This report is reviewed and discussed with Homer Bautista. A copy is provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 30, 2022
Jun 30, 2022Facility evaluation reportCase Management - DeficienciesDeficiency page: Type A
Type of visit: Case Management - Deficiencies
On June 30, 2022, Licensing Program Analysts (LPA) Komal Charitra and Kevin Varilla conducted an unannounced case management visit. LPA Charitra and LPA Varilla met with House Manager, Homer Bautista, and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA also notified Administrator, Victoria Alejandro via telephone the purpose of the visit. During a plan of correction (POC) visit to the facility on June 30, 2022, LPAs observed 1 staff member and 3 residents. LPAs observed Staff #1 (S1) was not fingerprint cleared to work at the facility. According to the Administrator, S1 has been working at the facility since April of 2022. LPAs reviewed the facility roster and S1 is associated, however does not have fingerprint clearance to be providing care to residents at the facility. This violation results in an civil penalty of $100 per day x 10 days = $1,000 Report is reviewed with House Manager, Homer Bautista and a copy is provided with appeals rights.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 30, 2022
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87355(e)(2) · Plan of correction due date: Jul 1, 2022
87355 Criminal Record Clearance: (e) All individuals subject to a criminal record review pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 1569.17(b) shall prior to working, residing or volunteering in a licensed facility: (2) Request a transfer of a criminal record clearance as specified in Section 87355(c) Violation of this regulation is not met as evidence by: Based on records review, and information collected, it was indicated that Staff #1 (S1) is not fingerprint cleared to work at the facility which poses an immediate health and safety threat to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 30, 2022
Plan of correction: Licensee/administrator shall ensure that all employees obtain criminal record clearance and clearance transfer PRIOR to employment or initial presence in the facility. Administrator/Licensee to submit proof of criminal record clearance to CCLD by 7/1/2022. Immediate civil penalty of $1,000 was issued today. $100 x 10 days = $1,000
Jun 16, 2022Facility evaluation reportCase Management - OtherDeficiency page: Type A
Type of visit: Case Management - Other
On June 16, 2022, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Komal Charitra, conducted an unannounced case management visit. LPA met with House manager, Homer Bautista and Caregiver, Noel Elizaga, and explained the purpose of the visit. During the complaint investigation 14-AS-20220222094818, LPA Charitra cited the facility for Section 87307(a)(2)Personal Accommodation and Services, as a result of the facility utilizing the garage as a sleeping area for staff. The facility’s plan of correction was to submit a new facility floor plan to CCLD to request for a new fire clearance. On June 13, 2022, CCLD received the fire clearance request back from South San Francisco Fire Department, and it was indicated that sleeping in the garage is not allowed and that all sleeping items must be removed from the garage. During the visit today, LPA observed the couch still in the garage. According to the House Manager, there is still a staff member currently sleeping in the garage. The house manager indicated that the staff member will move all personal belonging in the facility van. In addition, the house manager indicated that the staff will be utilizing the facility van as a sleeping area. Deficiency of the Residential Care Elderly California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6 is observed and cited on a LIC809D. Failure to correct the deficiencies may result in civil penalties. This report is reviewed and discussed with Homer Bautista; a copy of the report is provided with appeal rights.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 16, 2022
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87203 · Plan of correction due date: Jun 17, 2022
87203 FIRE SAFETY: All facilities shall be maintained in conformity with the regulations adopted by the State Fire Marshal for the protection of life and property against fire and panic. Violation of this regulation is not met as evidenced by: Based on observations and information collected, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above, as the garage was being used by staff for sleeping, which poses an immediate health, safety, or personal rights risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 16, 2022
Plan of correction: Facility will find alternative sleeping area for staff and notify and check with CCLD to ensure it meets CCR regulations.
Mar 28, 2022Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated
Allegation investigated: -COVID positive staff member provided care and supervision to COVID negative residents introducing COVID into facility -Facility administrator does not spend required minimum amount of hours at facility -Facility not following program designed
On March 28, 2022 at 8:15am, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Komal Charitra conducted an unnannounced complaint visit to deliver the findings for the above allegations. LPA met with House Manager, Homer Bautista, and explained the purpose of the visit. On January 13, 2021, the Department received a complaint alleging that there was a COVID positive staff (S1) providing care and supervision to COVID negative residents introducing COVID into the facility. According to the complainant, S1 was providing care and supervision to 3 residents. During the investigation, LPA Charitra interviewed staff and it was indicated that S1 was on his/her way to the facility when he/she received postive results. According to the interviewed staff, two staff members who worked NOC shift at the facility abandoned the facility and the residents to avoid coming in contact with S1, therefore the residents did not have a staff member present to provide care and supervision to the resident. The administrator admitted that she allowed S1, who was COVID positive to provide care and supervision to 3 COVID negative residents with full PPE. Based on the interviews and information collected, it was determined that the there was a COVID positive staff providing care and supervision to COVID negative residents introducing COVID into the facility. The preponderance of evidence standard has been met; therefore, these allegations are Substantiated. (CONT. TO 9099C) Substantiated Regarding the allegation that the facility administrator does not spend sufficient amount of time at the facility, according to the complainant, facility administrator comes to the facility sporadically and mainly to deliver groceries, and she divides her time between two facilities; therefore, she is not present at the facility sufficient amount of time required to ensure that the facility operates accordingly. During the investigation, LPA interviewed staff and it was indicated that the administrator is in the facility 2-3x a week or once every two weeks to deliver groceries. Nevertheless, LPA Charitra interviewed the administrator and it was acknowledged that he/she comes to the facility 3x a week for 2-4 hours. Based on LPAs observations and interviews which were conducted, it was determined that the administrator does not spend a sufficient amount of time at the facility to meet the administrator qualifications and duties. The preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. Regarding the allegation that the facility is not following program design, according to the complainant, the facility program design requires a 1:1 care between caregivers and residents; however, there are only two staff members providing care and supervision to 3 residents. LPA Charitra reviewed the plan of operations and verified that the facility submitted and got approved a program design requiring 1:1 staffing provided during most waking hours and two staff providing awake supervision and care during sleeping hours. On January 21, 2022, when LPA Charitra conducted the 10-day complaint visit at the facility, LPA observed 3 residents and 2 staff members, one of which was shadowing that day. This indicates that the facility failed to follow the stated plan of operations. Interviewed staff indicated that since the facility went through a change of ownership, the facility has not been able to meet 1:1 care. According to the Administrator, the facility is trying to hire more staff and is trying to comply to the 1:1 program design but it’s been difficult due to staffing. Nevertheless, the licensee failed to follow the program design in order to meet the resident’s care and supervision. Based on the interviews and documentation, it was determined that the licensee failed to follow the program design and to ensure the proper care and supervision for the residents. Furthermore, the licensee failed to address the staffing concern and find alternative solutions to meet the program design. The preponderance of evidence standard has been met; therefore, this allegation is SUBSTANTIATED. Deficiency of the Residential Care Elderly California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6 is observed and cited on a LIC 809D. Failure to correct the deficiencies may result in civil penalties. Report is reviewed with House Manager, Homer Bautista, and a copy is provided. Regarding the allegation that the facility administrator provided Licensing with false claims, regarding staffing and resident relocation; On January 12, 2022, LPA Jamie Vado spoke to Administrator regarding the COVID cases at the facility. According to the administrator, the facility at the time did not have any positive residents and there was a sufficient number of staffs to care for the residents. During the exchange, there was a question whether residents had been relocated to accommodate supervision. The Administrator first denied the relocation, and then reported that indeed there had been a relocation. However, during the investigation, staff interviewed, and information collected indicated that the facility has been short on staff but did not relocate the residents at any point. Therefore, based on the information collected, and interviews, the allegation that the facility administrator provided licensing with false claims regarding staffing and resident relocation is UNSUBSTANTIATED, meaning that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is no preponderance of evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred. Report is reviewed with House Manager, Homer Bautista, and a copy is providedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 28, 2022 · control 14-AS-20220113114225
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87405(a) · Plan of correction due date: Mar 29, 2022
87405(a) Administrator Qualifications: ll facilities shall have a qualified and currently certified administrator… The administrator shall have sufficient freedom from other responsibilities and shall be on the premises a sufficient number of hours to permit adequate attention to the management and administration of the facility as specified in this section… Violation of this regulation is evidence by interviewed staff indicating that the current administrator will mainly come to the facility to drop off groceries once every 2 weeks or come to the facility sporadically. In addition, LPA Charitra interviewed the administrator and it was acknowledged that he/she comes to the facility 3x a week for 2-4 hours. Nevertheless, administrator has failed to spend a sufficient number of hours in the facility to give adequate attention to the administration of the facility.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 28, 2022
Plan of correction: Administrator/Licensee shall take refreshment courses and proper training from approved vendors to demonstrate licensee's ability to maintain administrator certificate. Facility Administrator to submit acknowledgement of Title 22 regulation for Administrator Qualifications and Duties.
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87468.1(a)(2) · Plan of correction due date: Apr 4, 2022
87468.1 Personal Rights of Residents in All Facilities: (a) Residents in all residential care facilities for the elderly shall have all of the following personal rights:(2) To be accorded safe, healthful and comfortable accommodations, furnishings and equipment. Violation of this regulation is not met as evidenced by: According to interviewed staff, it was indicated that there was a COVID positive staff (S1) assisting 3 COVID negative residents at the facility. Additionally, S1 exposed the three residents to an infectious disease, COVID-19, by providing care and supervision to residents in care. Nevertheless, the administrator admitted that she allowed S1 to assist the residents which poses a health and safety risk to the residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 28, 2022
Plan of correction: Administrator/Licensee to submit acknowledgement of Title 22, Regulations for CCR, Personal Rights of Residents in All Facilities 87468, Personal RIghts of Residents in All Facilities
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87208(a) · Plan of correction due date: Apr 4, 2022
Plan of operation: Each facility shall have and maintain a current, written definitive plan of operation... Any significant changes in the plan of operation which would affect the services to residents shall be submitted to the licensing agency for approval… The plan and related materials shall contain the following…Statement of purposes and program goals…Administrative organization, Staffing plan, qualifications, and duties. Plan for training staff, as required by Section 87411(c). Violation of this regulation is not met by facility administrator and interviewed staff indicating that the program design requires a 1:1 care between caregivers and residents; however, there are only two staff members providing care and supervision to 3 residents. Additionally, the interviewed staff indicated that the facility has not been meeting the 1:1 care noted in the program design due to the insufficient number of staff at the facility. Nevertheless, the licensee failed to follow the program design and find an alternative solution to meet the program design.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 28, 2022
Plan of correction: Licensee/Administrator to follow the program design or find a solution to meet the program design.
Mar 9, 2022Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Facility bathroom is in disrepair Staff is sleeping in the garage
On March 15, 2022, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Komal Charitra conducted an unnannounced complaint visit to deliver the findings for the above allegations. LPA was greeted by Administrator, Victoria Alejandro and explained the purpose of the visit. Regarding the allegation that facility bathroom is in disrepair, according to the complainant, the bathroom faucet was broken, and the bathroom shower and toilet were clogged. On February 25, 2022, LPA Charitra conducted the unannounced 10-day complaint visit and observed the three bathrooms in the facility. LPA observed that the faucet was broken in the male’s bathroom. According to the staff, it was indicated that the toilet in one of the bathrooms require multiple flushes if there is a lot of bowel or toilet paper in the toilet. LPA was notified that maintenance was going to come to the facility to fix the toilet. Based on the observations and information collected, it was determined that the facility was in disrepair. Based on this information this allegation is substantiated. (CONTINUE TO 9099C). Substantiated Regarding the allegation that staff is sleeping in the garage, according to the complainant, there is a staff member who sleeps in the garage. During the investigation, LPA interviewed four staff members and it was acknowledged that Staff (S1) does sleep in the garage overnight because he/she does not have a place to live. Additionally, S1 admitted to sleeping in the garage on the couch that converts into a bed and keeps personal belongings in his/her car. Based on the interviews and the information collected, it was determined that S1 has been sleeping in the garage since he/she started working at the facility. Based on this information this allegation is substantiated. California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6, are being cited on the attached LIC9099D. Report is reviewed with Administrator, Victoria Alejandro and a copy is provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 9, 2022 · control 14-AS-20220222094818
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87303(a) · Plan of correction due date: Mar 22, 2022
Maintenance and Operation: The facility shall be clean, safe, sanitary and in good repair at all times. Maintenance shall include provision of maintenance services and procedures for the safety and well-being of residents, employees and visitors. Violation of this regulation is evidence by LPA’s observations noted in LIC9099 and the interviews indicating that the facility faucet in the men’s bathroom was broken and that the toilet in the resident bathroom required multiple flushes if there is a lot of toilet paper or bowel in the toilet.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 9, 2022
Plan of correction: Licensee/administrator to fix the bathroom faucet and toilet in the bathroom and provide LPA with a photo indicating that both have been fixed.
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87307(a)(2) · Plan of correction due date: Mar 22, 2022
Personal Accommodation and Services: Living accommodations and grounds shall be related to the facility's function. The facility shall be large enough to provide comfortable living accommodations and privacy for the residents, staff, and others who may reside in the facility. The following provisions shall apply… Resident bedrooms shall be provided which meet, at a minimum, the following requirements… No room commonly used for other purposes shall be used as a sleeping room for any resident. This includes any hall, stairway, unfinished attic, garage storage area, shed or similar detached building… Violation of this regulation is evidence by all staff interviewed acknowledged that S1 sleeps in the garage.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 9, 2022
Plan of correction: Administrator/Licensee to provide LPA acknowledgment of Title 22 Regulations for Personal Accommodation. Administrator/Licensee to submit a new facility floor plan to request for a new fire clearance.
20211 state visit · 1 document
Nov 29, 2021Facility evaluation reportPrelicensingReport on file
Type of visit: Prelicensing
On 11/29/21 at 10AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Murial Han met with the Administrator, Roy Johnson to conduct an unannounced Pre-Licensing inspection for change of ownership. LPA Han was properly screened by the Administrator at the entry and LPA observed COVID-19 signs posted by the front entry. The new Administrator, Victoria Alejandro also arrived at the facility for the inspection. LPA observed the indoor and the outdoor passageways are free of obstruction. The Administrator provided a tour of the facility and all the clients were at the Day Program during the inspection. This is a one story facility with 4 private bedrooms. Three rooms are occupied. The client's rooms, the living room, the kitchen, the shower room, the bathrooms and the dining room are well maintained and appeared to be cleaned. The overall facility temperature was measured at 72 degrees Fahrenheit (F). the hot water temperature was measured in the half bathroom, shower room and the kitchen were at 115- 118 degrees F. The laundry room was cleaned and chemicals were locked. The medication storage was locked and inaccessible to the residents. The Carbon Monoxide detectors were present and properly operated. The first aide kit was inspected and equipped. Food supplies were observed to be adequate. The refrigerator temperature was measured at 34 degrees F and the freezer was measured at -1 degree F. The fire and smoke detectors are observed to be operated properly, the fire extinguishes observed to be adequate, and the Administrator reported that there is no firearms and/or ammunition at the facility. The Activities Calendar, the Resident Rights, the Ombudsman, the House Rules, the Licensing Complaint Poster and the Resident Council Rights are posted. In addition, there are COVID-19 signs to be observed through-out the facility and in the bathrooms. PPE supplies are adequate, facility continues to conducted COVID-19 screening for all clients twice a day and staff once a day upon their arrival. In addition, staff members are randomly tested for COVID-19 every other week. There were no objects obstructing the emergency shut-offs: water, electricity (all locations are labeled) and gas shut-off stations. There are many digital communication devices observed around the facility to improve the communication between clients and staff. Facility sketch accurately reflects the floor plan. Comp III orientation was given to the new Administrator, Victoria Alejandro on 11/29/2021. Pre-Licensing is now complete. Immediate Licensure is recommended pending final approval from the Central Applications Bureau. Exit interview conducted with the Administrator, Roy Johnson and the new Administrator, Victoria Alejandro. A copy of the report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 29, 2021
3 of 3 beds were occupied at the September 13, 2023 state visit — a count on that day, not an opening.
License holder
Golden State Consulting Group LLC, licensed since 2021.
The state’s totals for this licenseSince 2021, as the state’s facility page counts them
- State visits on file
- 24
- Total complaints
- 5
- Substantiated allegations
- 7
- Type A citations
- 2
- Type B citations
- 5
These are the state’s own totals for this license since 2021, per CDSS records. The state counts them apart from the documents above, and they can differ from what those documents show; the documents say what each visit found. One complaint can contain several allegations.
Compare with homes the same size
| This home | Typical | |
|---|---|---|
| Type A citations | 2 | 0 |
| Type B citations | 5 | 0 |
| Substantiated allegations | 7 | 0 |
| Total complaints | 5 | 0 |
“Typical” is the statewide median for licensed homes this size. It does not adjust for years licensed, and older licenses have had more visits and reports. The median is across the 6,916 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record. The figures compared are the state’s totals, not the documents.
What the state’s words mean
CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents stand in their place.
Frequently asked questions
A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.
Quick answers about Arbor House
Is Arbor House licensed?
The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
How many residents is Arbor House licensed for?
4 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Has Arbor House been cited?
2 Type A and 5 Type B citations since 2021, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. Those records count 24 state visits over the same years.
Is Arbor House still open?
This license was on the CDSS roster as of November 11, 2026.
What does Arbor House cost?
$5,400 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $4,400–$6,650. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 17 small homes and similar homes within 3 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
Among 7 other homes of a similar licensed size in South San Francisco that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $5,500 to $5,938 a month, and the middle figure is $5,750 (n = 7 other homes publishing a starting rate).
Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.
A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.
The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.
A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.
Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
Does Arbor House take Medi-Cal?
On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated October 1, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
Who holds the license?
The license is held by Golden State Consulting Group LLC, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Is there a hospital nearby?
Kaiser Foundation Hospital - South San Francisco is 0.8 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.
Can Arbor House keep a resident on hospice?
Not on file — the state’s record does not list hospice care on this license. Ask: “Can a resident stay here on hospice, and under what conditions?”
Arbor House license and inspection record
- Name on the license: “ARBOR HOUSE”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
- License #415601122. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- Licensed for 4 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- Licensed to Golden State Consulting Group LLC, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- First licensed in 2021, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- 24 state inspection visits since 2021, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- 2 Type A and 5 Type B citations on file since 2021, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. The same records count 24 state visits in that period.
- 5 complaints and 7 substantiated allegations on file since 2021, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
- The most recent state visit on file is February 27, 2026, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗
Nearby
Other homes nearby
Licensed homes near this one in San Mateo County, most information on file first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.
- Map
Starting rate
$4,105 a month to start
Listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Map
Starting rate
$6,000 a month to start
Listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$6,050 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $5,000–$7,450On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$5,750 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $4,700–$7,100On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$5,700 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $4,700–$7,050On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$6,100 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $5,000–$7,550On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
Street maps © Protomaps · © OpenStreetMap
Explore San Mateo County