Illustration — no photo of this home on file yet

Anne's Place II

Small home·Licensed for 6·Escondido, California

Licensed since 2000Licence #374600949Medi-Cal ALW
  • Care approvals on fileWheelchair · Hospice · BedriddenState licensing record · September 27, 2026
  • Estimated starting rate$4,500 a monthCovelight estimate · likely $3,700–$5,600
  • Home sizeLicensed for 6Small care home · a licensed care home (RCFE)
  • Room at the last state visit5 of 6 beds occupiedMarch 29, 2024 · not a current opening
  • Ways to payMedi-Cal ALW acceptedDHCS participant list · August 9, 2026
  • Last state visitMay 13, 2026CDSS inspection record
  • Licence holderOsborne, Ana S.Since 2000 · 2 licensed homes

Anne's Place II is a small care home in Escondido — a licensed residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE), the licence category behind “assisted living” and “board and care.” It is licensed for 6 residents since 2000. Dementia care is not on file.

Built from CDSS public records · September 27, 2026. Every fact below names its source and date.

Quick answers and the state record

A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

Quick answers about Anne's Place II

Is Anne's Place II licensed?

The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

How many residents is Anne's Place II licensed for?

6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Has Anne's Place II been cited?

0 Type A and 1 Type B citation since 2000, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. Those records count 8 state visits over the same years.

Is Anne's Place II still open?

This license was on the CDSS roster as of September 28, 2026.

What does Anne's Place II cost?

$4,500 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $3,700–$5,600. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 14 small homes within 3 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

Among 32 other homes of a similar licensed size in Escondido that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $4,000 to $6,000 a month, and the middle figure is $5,000 (n = 32 other homes publishing a starting rate).

Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.

A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.

The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.

A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.

Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out. What Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver covers in a care home.

Does Anne's Place II take Medi-Cal?

On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home appears on the DHCS participation list, August 9, 2026. Confirm eligibility and current participation with the program. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.

Who holds the license?

The license is held by Osborne, Ana S., per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Can Anne's Place II keep a resident on hospice?

Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 4 residents, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Anne's Place II license and inspection record

  • Name on the license: “ANNE'S PLACE II”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
  • License #374600949. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • Licensed for 6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • Licensed to Osborne, Ana S., per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • First licensed in 2000, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • 8 state inspection visits since 2000, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • 0 Type A and 1 Type B citation on file since 2000, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. The same records count 8 state visits in that period.
  • 1 complaint and 1 substantiated allegation on file since 2000, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
  • The most recent state visit on file is May 13, 2026, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
Type A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗

See the state’s own record

Can they support the care needed?

California licenses a home for specific kinds of care. The state’s record lists what this home is approved for; the home’s own answers fill in what changes as needs change.

  • Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved by the state
  • Dementia / memory careNot on file · ask the home
  • Hospice careApproved · covers up to 4 residents
  • BedriddenApproved · covers up to 1 resident

State licensing record · September 27, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.

Read the state’s own wording
FACILITY SERVES SIX (6) ELDERLY RESIDENTS, AGE 60 AND ABOVE; ALL OF WHOM MAY BE NON-AMBULATORY AND ONE BEDRIDDEN RESIDENT. FACILITY HAS A HOSPICE WAIVER FOR (4) FOUR RESIDENTS AT ANY ONE TIME.

935 - ELDERLY

CDSS record, verbatim · September 27, 2026

As needs change

  • Staying through hospice

    Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 4 — care may continue at the end of life

    Ask: “If hospice is needed, can care continue here until the end?”

    State licensing record · September 27, 2026

4 more questions to ask the home
  • Two-person transfers or a lift

    Not on file

    Ask: “If two people or a lift are needed to transfer, can the person stay?”

  • Someone awake overnight

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?”

  • Medicines

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who manages the medicines, and what happens when a dose is missed?”

  • If memory loss develops

    Dementia-care designation not on file

    Ask: “If memory loss develops, what would change — and when would a move be needed?”

What it costs here

Covelight estimate

$4,500a month to start

Likely $3,700–$5,600

From 14 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file

Likely monthly total

$4,500a month

Likely $3,700–$5,800

With a shared room and basic help.

An estimate for planning, not a quote. The price is made in the phone call.

See the full cost breakdownRoom, care and fees · how people pay · how this estimate works
Room
Daily care
Sharing the room

Memory care is not priced here: a dementia-care designation is not on file for this home. Ask the home.

  • Starting monthly rate$4,500likely $3,700–$5,600

    Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 14 small homes within 3 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

  • Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600

    Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (45 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).

  • One-time move-in fee$2,000one time · likely $0–$4,000

    Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,000 (134 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.

Likely monthly totalLikely $3,700–$5,800
$4,500
First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $4,300–$8,900
$6,500
How people payOn the Medi-Cal waiver list · private pay, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
  • Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
  • Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home appears on the DHCS participation list, August 9, 2026. Confirm eligibility and current participation with the program. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board. For a resident on SSI/SSP, California’s 2026 standard sends $1,444.07 a month to the home for room and board.
  • SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
  • VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
  • Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
  • MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
If the money runs out, what Medi-Cal covers
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
  • The care level

    Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.

  • What is billed separately

    Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.

  • Move-in costs

    A one-time community fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.

  • Increases

    California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.

  • What is the full monthly cost for the room and care we need, and what does it include?
  • What would the next care level cost, and who decides when it changes?
  • What is billed separately, and is there a one-time fee or deposit at move-in?
  • Is any private-pay period required before another payment program can begin?
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 14 small homes within 3 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

14 homes like this within 3 miles publish starting rates mostly between $3,950–$6,150.

  • Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
  • Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
  • Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
  • Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
  • We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
  • It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Show the 14 nearby homes behind this estimate

Where it is

  • 2690 Mary Lane Place, Escondido, CA 92025Address from the public record · September 27, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.

Opening the neighborhood map…

The state record

California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. Here are the dated documents and the state’s own words, beside what is typical for homes this size.

Since 2021, the state has filed 7 documents for this home, and its records count 8 visits since 2000. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated May 13, 2026.

On file since
2021
State visits
8
Most recent visit
May 13, 2026
Occupied · March 29, 2024 visit
5 of 6 bedsa count on that day, not an opening

We hold 1 complaint report the state published for this home, dated March 29, 2024. 1 of the 1 carries the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (1). 1 includes the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word. Summary composed by computer from the 1 complaint report below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

Beside homes the same size

  • Type A citations0typical 0
  • Type B citations1typical 0
  • Substantiated allegations1typical 0
  • Total complaints1typical 0

“Typical” is the statewide median across the 6,808 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this licence since 2000.

Year by year
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated20261102025110202433120221102021110

The last 36 months — 5 of 7 documents

20261 state visit · 1 document
May 13, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Robert Campbell conducted an unannounced annual required visit. Upon entry, LPA was greeted by Maria Medero Hernandez, Caregiver, and informed them of the purpose of the visit. At the time of the visit, there were three (3) staff members and six (6) residents present. Dearme Doverte, Administrator, arrived later during the visit. Facility Overview: The facility is a one-story home with four (4) bedrooms and three (3) bathrooms, including an attached garage. There are no pools or known firearms on the premises. Infection Control: LPA observed that hygiene and cleaning supplies were available for regular facility maintenance. The facility has infection control plan in file. Physical Plant: The physical plant, including floors, windows, and doors, was clean and well maintained. Fixtures and furniture were in good repair. The outdoor area was free of hazards. Laundry equipment was in good working condition. Sharp and dangerous objects were securely locked and inaccessible to residents. Both the smoke detector and carbon monoxide detector were operational, and the hot water temperature was 110°F. Fire extinguisher located at kitchen had current inspection tag. Food Service: The facility’s kitchen was clean and equipped to prepare food. The facility maintained the required two-day supply of perishable foods and a seven-day supply of non-perishable foods. Continued on LIC809-C.... Continued... Care & Supervision/Administration: Adequate staff were present to supervise clients during the visit. The administrator holds a current administrator’s certificate. Record Review and Resident/Staff Files: LPA reviewed files for five (5) staff members, confirming criminal clearances, updated training, and CPR/First Aid certification. Six (6) resident files were reviewed and contained all the required documents. Health-Related Services/Incidental Medical Services: All resident medications were securely locked in kitchen closet. LPA reviewed medications for six (6) residents, confirming that all medications were listed on the Medication Administration Record (MAR) and accounted for. Personal & Incidental Funds: Facility doesn't handle Residents Monies. Disaster Preparedness: LPA reviewed the facility’s emergency and disaster plan, including documentation of the last emergency drill conducted on 4-01-2026, which met department requirements. All facility exits were clear of obstructions. No deficiencies were cited during the visit. An exit interview was conducted, during which this report was reviewed and provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 13, 2026
20251 state visit · 1 document
May 30, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Abdoulaye Zerbo conducted an unannounced visit for a required annual inspection. The LPA was greeted by the Caregiver Hortencia Chamu, notified them of the purpose for the visit and was allowed to enter the facility to conduct the inspection. The Administrator Dearme Doverte joined the visit at a later time. Facility Overview: The facility is a single story building with 3 resident bedrooms, 1 staff room, 3 bathrooms, a dinning room, an office, a kitchen, a living room and a garage. There is no gated pool and there are no firearms on the premises. Infection Control: LPA observed that hygiene and cleaning supplies were available for regular facility maintenance. The facility’s infection control plan was reviewed and found to meet department's requirements. Physical Plant: The physical plant, including floors, windows, and doors, was clean and well maintained. Fixtures and furniture were in good repair. Laundry equipment was in good working condition. Sharp and dangerous objects were securely locked in the kitchen and inaccessible to clients. The smoke detector and carbon monoxide detector were in good working condition. LPA observed fire extinguishers to be in compliance with the department's requirements. The water temperature was tested within regulations measuring at 111.0 F Continued 809-C.... Care & Supervision/Administration: Adequate staff were present to supervise clients during the visit. The Administrator holds a current Administrator’s certificate with expiration date of 12-7-25 and a CPR certification with the expiration date of 07-20-25. Record Review and Resident/Staff Files: LPA reviewed files for 2 staff members, confirming criminal clearance, updated training, and CPR/First Aid certification. 3 residents' files were reviewed and contained all required documentation. LPA observed first kit to be locked and inaccessible to the clients in care. The clients and staff files were kept locked and inaccessible to unauthorized individuals Health-Related Services/Incidental Medical Services: All residents' medications were securely locked in a cabinet and located in the kitchen area. LPA reviewed medications for 3 residents, confirming that all medications were listed and accounted for. Disaster Preparedness: LPA reviewed the facility’s emergency and disaster plan, including documentation of the last emergency drill conducted on 4-01-2025, which met the department's requirements. All facility exits were clear of obstructions. No deficiencies were cited during the visit. An exit interview was conducted, during which this report was reviewed, and a copy was provided to Administrator Dearme Doverte.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 30, 2025
20243 state visits · 3 documents
Jun 13, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Deficiencies

Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs), Stephanie Martinez and Valerie Flores, conducted an unannounced visit to the facility to address a violation observed by LPA Martinez. The LPAs met with Ana Osborne, Licensee, and informed her of the purpose for their visit. LPA Martinez observed an incomplete Resident Appraisal (LIC 603A) on file for Resident One (R1). According to R1's admission agreement the resident was admitted on 05/28/2024. The LPA observed the appraisal to have some information relating to R1's health and physical disabilities; however, the form was not completed. According to Licensee Osborne, a pre-admission appraisal was completed by herself and Staff One (S1) prior to the resident moving into the facility. No additional notes relating to the pre-admission appraisal were observed on file. LPA Martinez was informed by Licensee Osborne that R1, who left the facility for a hospitalization, was observed by staff to have additional needs not reported by the health facility that placed R1. According to Licensee Osborne, no notes documenting the staff observations were completed. Therefore, a citation will be issued. An exit interview was conducted with House Manager, Dearme Doverte; this report was reviewed, and a copy was provided, along with the LIC 811 and appeal rights.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 13, 2024

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87505 · Plan of correction due date: Jul 4, 2024

Documentation and Support: Each facility shall document in writing the findings of the pre-admission appraisal & any reappraisal or assessment which was necessary in accordance w/ Sections 87457 and 87463. If supporting documentation from a physician is required, this input shall also be obtained and may be the same assessment as required in Section 87458. This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews, the Licensee did not ensure findings from R1's pre-admission appraisal were documented. This poses a potential threat to the health, safety and personal rights of the residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 13, 2024

Plan of correction: The House Manager stated in-service training relating to appraisals will be completed for managerial staff by a third party and proof will be submitted to the Department.

May 22, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Jacqueline Shaw Ross, made an unannounced visit to the facility to conduct an annual inspection. LPA met with Stefan Rudolph, Operations Manager, who was informed of the purpose of the visit. Administrator Anna Osborne and House Manager Dearme Doverte arrived shortly. At the time of visit there were 2 staff and 5 residents present. An overall tour of the facility was conducted inside and out. The facility is licensed for six elderly non-ambulatory residents, and has an approved hospice waiver for four residents. There is approved bedridden fire clearance for one resident. There are currently three residents on hospice. LPA conducted staff and resident interviews. Tour included: Physical Plant: The facility is one story with five bedrooms and three bathrooms. The tour of the front entrance, interior and exterior surroundings were observed to be in good repair with no pathway obstruction and facility's water temperature measured at 110 degrees Fahrenheit. LPA inspected all of the residents bedrooms and observed them to be clean, and odor free. The inspection also revealed sufficient lighting and mattress pads in residents bedrooms. Furthermore, smoke and carbon monoxide detectors were also inspected and found to be in working order. All cleaning solutions were observed in a locked secure area. The facility does not house firearms and/or ammunition on grounds. Emergency drills are conducted on a quarterly basis. The last drill was conducted on 4/5/2024. Fire extinguishers were observed to be fully charged. Food Services: 7 day non-perishable and 2 day of perishable food supply were observed, and all food was properly stored and available to residents. Staff records were reviewed and contained criminal record clearance, CPR/First Aid training, Health Screening Reports, and annual training. Resident records were reviewed and had a current Physician's Report, Resident Appraisal, Identification and Emergency Information, Admission Agreement, and Centrally Stored Medication and Destruction Records. Medications were stored in a locked cabinet and were labeled and maintained in compliance with label instructions. No deficiencies were observed during today's visit. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report along with LIC 811 was provided to House Manager Dearme Doverte.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 22, 2024
Mar 29, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Licensee is resident #1's payee

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Sabel Martinez, conducted an unannounced complaint investigation visit to deliver findings. The LPA introduced himself and disclosed the purpose of the visit to Caregiver Alexandra Leon. House Manager Dearme Doverte and Licensee Ana Osborne arrived during the visit and assisted the LPA. Throughout the investigation, the Department secured pertinent records and conducted interviews with external and internal sources, including staff and clients. It was alleged the Licensee was the assigned payee for a resident. On 12/02/2020, it was reported to the Department that the Licensee was assigned to be Resident #1’s (R1) payee. Review of records along with multiple interviews, including the Licensee, confirmed the Licensee was R1’s payee. The records did not reveal any written documented consent from R1, nor R1’s guardian. It was also revealed R1’s guardian was actively working with the Licensee to re-assign R1’s guardian as the payee for social security benefits. (See LIC 9099C for continuation of report.) Substantiated Based on evidence obtained, the allegation was Substantiated. The deficiency was cited in accordance with California Code of Regulations, Title 22, and listed on the LIC 9099D. A plan of correction was jointly formulated with Licensee Odborne. An exit interview was conducted with Doverte and Osborne, to whom a copy of this report, LIC 9099D, and Licensee/Appeals Rights (LIC 9058), were provided. The investigation did not yield enough evidence to prove the facility staff were not following this diet. It was alleged the Licensee violated a resident's personal rights. It was reported to the Department a resident was not allowed to have private telephone conversations and that the resident was not allowed to seek a new facility. Interviews with internal and external sources revealed conflicting statements regarding the resident’s desire to leave the facility, and the resident’s conservatorship status. An interview with the resident did not reveal any concerns with the facility not allowing the resident to relocate, nor the facility not allowing the resident to have private phone conversations. Interviews with the resident’s responsible party and the facility administrator revealed there had been concerns regarding a third party contacting the resident, encouraging the resident to relocate. Records obtained by the Department confirmed the resident had a guardian appointed prior to the resident being admitted. It was alleged the Licensee did not maintain accurate record keeping of the administration of medication. It was reported to the Department the facility did not document the administration of insulin for a resident. Interviews with a source revealed the resident in question was diabetic but was not prescribed insulin. Review of records, including medication records, and interviews of sources did not reveal any concerns regarding lack of documentation. Additionally, interviews along with the resident’s physician’s report revealed the resident had a history of refusing medication. An exit interview was conducted with Doverte and Osborne, to whom a copy of this report, and Licensee/Appeals Rights (LIC 9058), were provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 29, 2024 · control 08-AS-20201202152956

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87468.2(a)(26)(B) · Plan of correction due date: Mar 28, 2024

87468.2 Additional Personal Rights of Residents in Privately Operated Facilities (a) In addition to the rights listed in Section 87468.1, Personal Rights of Residents in All Facilities, residents in privately operated residential care facilities for the elderly shall have all of the following personal rights:(26)To manage their financial affairs. A licensee shall not require residents to deposit their personal funds with the licensee. Except as provided for in approved continuing care agreements, a licensee, or a spouse, domestic partner, relative, or employee of a licensee, shall not do any of the following: (B) Become or act as a representative payee for any payments made to a resident, without the written and documented consent of the resident or the resident’s representative. This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on review of records and interviews, the licensee did not ensure the Licensee had prior written consent to be assigned as R1's payee, which posed a potential health, safety, and personal rights risk to 1 of 5 residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 29, 2024

Plan of correction: Licensee agreed to review personal rights regulations. Resident is no longer residing at the facility, therefore, the Plan of Correction was cleared on today's date.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedthere was not enough evidence to prove a violation occurred — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe evidence showed the allegation was false, could not have happened, or had no reasonable basisType A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗

An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents and the questions below stand in their place.

Who holds the licence

Osborne, Ana S., licensed since 2000, operates 2 licensed homes in California. Running more than one home is common and is neither good nor bad on its own.

Life here

Rooms, meals, the rhythm of a day, faith and language, pets and house rules — as the home describes them. Tap any detail for its source and date; nothing here is graded.

The home has not described daily life anywhere we have reviewed yet — that is the case for most small homes, and it says nothing about the home. These questions fill in the picture; keep the ones that matter to you.

Before you call

Ask every home the same questions — the state’s record does not answer these. Keep the ones that matter and they travel with your saved homes.

  1. What is included in the monthly rate, and what costs extra?
  2. Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?
  3. Which rooms does the non-ambulatory approval cover, and what transfer support is provided?
  4. What could change whether someone can stay here?
  5. Can we see a bedroom and share a meal during a visit?

Other homes nearby

The nearest licensed homes in San Diego County, closest first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.

Explore San Diego County