Small home · Licensed for 6 · Oceanside
Villa Florenza
5171 Alamosa Park Dr, Oceanside, CA 92057Licensed since 2019
Overview
No openings reported
- Approved by the state: Wheelchair · Dementia · HospiceState licensing record · October 26, 2026
- Licensed for 6: a small care homeThe state license record
Ask this home
Free for families. A home gets your number only if you say yes.
Care and support
- Wheelchairup to 6 residents
- Dementia
- Hospiceup to 6 residents
Not on file: bedridden approval.
Approved by the state · State licensing record · October 26, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.
Read the state’s own wording
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 6 NON-AMBULATORY. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 6.
983 - RCFE / DEMENTIA
CDSS record, verbatim · October 26, 2026
As needs change
Staying through hospice
Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 6 — care may continue at the end of life
State licensing record · October 26, 2026
If memory loss develops
Dementia-care designation on file
State licensing record · October 26, 2026
We’ll ask for you. Not on file for Villa Florenza: two-person transfers or a lift, who is awake overnight and help with medicines. When we check availability, we ask about these too.
Check availabilityWhat it costs here
This home’s starting rate
$5,200a month to start
Listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026
Monthly cost breakdownWith a shared room and basic help · room, care and fees$5,200likely a month
Starting monthly rate$5,200this home
The home lists this starting rate on Seniorly for assisted living shared bedroom, seen September 9, 2026.
Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600
Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (44 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).
One-time move-in fee$2,500one time · likely $0–$4,000
Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,500 (133 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.
- Likely monthly totalLikely $5,200–$5,800
- $5,200
- First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $5,200–$9,350
- $7,700
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
- MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
- Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
- Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated October 1, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
- SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
- VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
- Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
Rates at nearby homes14 nearby homes publish starting rates of $3,500 to $6,000
14 homes like this within 3 miles publish starting rates mostly between $3,500–$6,000.
- Angels in GraceOceanside · 0.6 mi · Small home$5,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Treegrove Senior ResidenceOceanside · 0.8 mi · Small home$5,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Verdugo Boarding HomeOceanside · 1.5 mi · Small home$3,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
- Casa VerdugoOceanside · 1.5 mi · Small home$5,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Weaver's Primrose VillaOceanside · 1.9 mi · Small home$6,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
- Paradise Home CareOceanside · 2.0 mi · Small home$4,500Listed on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026
- Blue Skies of PendletonOceanside · 2.2 mi · Small home$6,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
- Weaver's Lilac VillaOceanside · 2.2 mi · Small home$6,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
- Blue Skies of OceansideOceanside · 2.2 mi · Small home$4,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
- Mt Community HomesOceanside · 2.3 mi · Small home$5,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Rancho Pacific Home CareOceanside · 2.3 mi · Small home$3,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Amparo Senior CareOceanside · 2.4 mi · Small home$5,400Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Angel's Home CareOceanside · 2.5 mi · Small home$4,500Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Pacific BreezeOceanside · 2.6 mi · Small home$3,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
How this estimate worksWhere this price comes from
The home lists this starting rate on Seniorly for assisted living shared bedroom, seen September 9, 2026.
- Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
- Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
- Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
- Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
- We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
- It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
- The care level
Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.
- What is billed separately
Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.
- Move-in costs
A one-time move-in fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.
- Increases
California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.
An estimate for planning, not a quote. A home sets the price after hearing about the care needed.
Daily life
Daily life here is not on file yet. Most small homes haven’t published it, and that says nothing about the home.
The best way to see it is a visit.
Request a tourWhere it is
5171 Alamosa Park Dr, Oceanside, CA 92057Address from the public record · October 26, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.
Opening the neighborhood map…
- Sharp Tri-City Medical CenterHospital · General acute care, on the state’s list3.9 mi
Straight-line distances; check the drive or the walk. Hospital: the nearest general acute care hospital on the state’s list (CDPH, September 16, 2026).
Open directionsThe state record
California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.
CDSS public record, read October 26, 2026 · License #374604215 · See the state’s own record
The last 36 months — 5 of 9 documents
Complaint outcomes in these 36 months, in the state’s words: 2 “Substantiated”.
20262 state visits · 2 documents
Jun 11, 2026Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Licensee is housing a bedridden resident without the required fire clearance.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Amy Domingo conducted an unannounced visit to initiate a complaint investigation regarding the above-mentioned allegation. LPA identified herself and met with Christopher Diaz, caregiver, to discuss the purpose of the visit and elements of the complaint. LPA spoke to Javed Talukder, Administrator, regarding the reason for the visit The Department’s investigation consisted of unannounced facility visits, interviews with facility staff, residents, outside sources, and records review. On 6/8/26, it was alleged that the licensee is housing a bedridden resident without the required fire clearance. Review of resident records revealed that 1 of 3 residents are documented as bedridden. Review of the facility's fire clearance and license revealed that the facility does not have a fire clearance for retaining bedridden residents. The Department has investigated the above-mentioned allegation, and based on observation and record review, the preponderance of the evidence has been met; therefore, this allegation is deemed substantiated. The following deficiency is cited per CA Code of Regulations Title 22 and noted on the attached LIC9099-D page. A civil penalty in the amount of $500 has been assessed during today's visit. An exit interview was conducted with Caregiver Christopher Diaz, and a copy of this report, the LIC421IM (7/17), and the Licensee Appeal Rights (LIC9058 01/16) were provided to Christopher Diaz via hard copy. Substantiated The Department has investigated the above-mentioned allegation, and based on observation and record review, the preponderance of the evidence has been met; therefore, this allegation is deemed substantiated. The following deficiency is cited per CA Code of Regulations Title 22 and noted on the attached LIC9099-D page. A civil penalty in the amount of $500 has been assessed during today's visit. An exit interview was conducted with Caregiver Christopher Diaz, and a copy of this report, the LIC421IM (7/17), and the Licensee Appeal Rights (LIC9058 01/16) were provided to Christopher Diaz via hard copy.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 11, 2026 · control 08-AS-20260608090015
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87202(a)(2)(c)(1) · Plan of correction due date: Jun 12, 2026
FIRE CLEARANCE - ...bedridden persons may be admitted to, and remain in, residential care facilities for the elderly that secure and maintain an appropriate fire clearance. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: LPA observed resident #1, and reviewed resident #1's physician report all of whom state resident #1 is bedridden. LPA confirmed that the current fire clearance does not include bedridden satus. This poses an immediate safety risk ro re care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 11, 2026
Plan of correction: Licensee advises they will submit an LIC 9054, LIC 200 and LIC 610 by POC date to CCL via fax or email (forms were provided to licensee). Final bedridden clearance pending fire department approval.
May 5, 2026Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Licensee does not ensure sufficient staffing Facility staff are not following infection control guidelines
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Ramin Hashemi conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings regarding the above complaint allegation(s). LPA introduced themselves and disclosed the purpose of the visit to Licensee Dr. Mohammad Rahman. On 02/10/2026 it was alleged that "Licensee does not ensure sufficient staffing" and that "Facility staff are not following infection control guidelines." The Department’s investigation consisted of unannounced facility visits, interviews with facility staff, and records review. Regarding the allegation, "Licensee does not ensure sufficient staffing," it was alleged that licensee did not accommodate staff schedules to allow for absence of staff due to sickness. (Continued on LIC9099C, Page 2) Substantiated (Continued from LIC9099, Page 1) Regarding the allegation, "Facility staff are not following infection control guidelines" it was alleged that facility staff did not follow the infection control plan in the plan of operations of the facility by allowing a staff to provide care during an infectious period. Interviews with staff revealed that S1 was working with residents during the week of February 6th - February 13th 2026. S1 stated they had a doctor's note excusing them from work. Interviews with S1 and S2 confirmed S1 was working with residents during the infectious period and as part of their tasks, preparing meals for residents. Staff unanimously said they tried to contact the administrators to find relief but stated administrators were absent, did not respond to calls, and when they did respond, made promises to get coverage but ultimately did not or fell through. Records review revealed that S1 had a doctor's note excusing them from work for one week and allowing them to return to normal work duties on February 14, 2026. A handwritten schedule of shifts for the week showed that S1 worked four of the seven days they were sick and excused from work. Review of the infection control plan included in the plan of operation states that "Any care staff who are known to be affected with any illness in a communicable stage should not be allowed to have direct contact with residents or resident food." Regulation review of California Code of Regulations, Title 22 states that facility personnel shall at all times be sufficient in numbers, and competent to provide the services necessary to meet resident needs. As evaluated by a physician, S1 was deemed not "competent" to work during the time period they were infected. Based on relevant interviews and records review, the preponderance of evidence has been met that alleged violations occurred and are therefore substantiated. Deficiencies are cited per California Code of Regulations, Title 22 (refer to the attached LIC 9099-D). A Plan of Correction was jointly developed with the licensee. An exit interview was conducted with Licensee Dr. Mohammad Rahman, to whom a copy of this report, the LIC811 Confidential Names List, and the Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC9058 03/22) were provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 5, 2026 · control 08-AS-20260210111209
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87411(a) · Plan of correction due date: May 5, 2026
87411-Personnel Requirements - General: (a) Facility personnel shall at all times be sufficient in numbers, and competent to provide the services necessary to meet resident needs. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee did not ensure working staff were competent to work during the alleged time period, which posed a potential Health, Safety, and Personal rights risks to 6 of 6 persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 5, 2026
Plan of correction: Licensee shall develop updated policy concerning workplace sickness absenses with an emphasis on facility management's role in ensuring coverage . All staff shall sign as proof of review. Proof of corrections shall be submitted to CCLD Offices by 05/22/2026.
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87208(a)(12) · Plan of correction due date: May 5, 2026
87208 Plan of Operation: (a) The licensee shall operate the facility in accordance with the terms specified in the plan of operation and may be cited for not doing so… The plan and related materials shall contain the following: (12) The Infection Control Plan.... Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee did not ensure staff with communicable diseases were not allowed contact with resident's or their food, which posed a potential Health, Safety, and Personal rights risks to 6 of 6 persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 5, 2026
Plan of correction: LIcensee and facility staff shall review infection control plan and have all staff sign as proof of review. Proof of corrections shall be submitted to CCLD Offices by 05/22/2026..
20251 state visit · 1 document
Dec 5, 2025Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Ramin Hashemi conducted an unannounced Required Annual Inspection. The facility file was reviewed prior to the visit. LPA was welcomed by and discussed the purpose of the visit to Caregiver Emma Hamto and Licensee Zebi Alvi. The facility's license shows a maximum capacity of six (6) non-ambulatory residents, ages 60 and over. The facility has an approved hospice waiver for six (6). During today’s inspection there were five (5) residents in care. LPA and Caregiver toured the interior and exterior of the facility and inspected each room. The facility was clean, sanitary, and in good repair. Pathways were free of obstruction and slip hazards. Resident bedrooms contained the required furnishings. Doors, windows, screens, toilets, and showers were in working order. Extra linens and hygiene supplies were present, as well as Personal Protective Equipment. The facility had sufficient space and equipment to facilitate dining, laundry, visitation, meetings, and client activities. The facility contained at least 2 days of perishable food, and at least 7 days non-perishable food, all safely stored. Cooking, dining equipment, and utensils were present. No toxic chemicals or poisons were accessible to Residents. Medications were labeled, as required, and stored in locked areas. No pools or bodies of water exist on the premises. Per Licensee, no firearms or ammunition are kept at the facility. Carbon monoxide detectors, emergency lighting, and facility telephone were all in working order. Fire extinguisher(s) were serviced within the last 12 months. First aid kit(s) were complete and readily accessible. Required licensing postings were observed in visible areas of the facility. LPA interviewed staff and residents, and reviewed facility records. The files reviewed by LPA contained required documents. Confidential records were stored in locked areas. No deficiencies were cited during the inspection. An exit interview was conducted with Licensee Zebi Alvi to whom a copy of this report and the Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC9058 03/22) were provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 5, 2025
20241 state visit · 1 document
Dec 4, 2024Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Hannah Rodgers conducted an unannounced Required Annual Inspection. The facility file was reviewed prior to the visit. LPA was greeted by, identified themselves to and discussed the purpose of the visit with Caregiver Emma Hamto. The facility's license shows a maximum capacity of six (6) non-ambulatory residents. Hospice waiver for six (6). During today’s inspection there were four (4) residents in care with three (3) residents on hospice. Administrator Zohaib Alvi arrived later during the visit. LPA with Caregiver Hamto toured the interior and exterior of the facility, and inspected each room. Pathways were free of obstruction and slip hazards. Resident bedrooms contained the required furnishings. Doors, windows, screens, and showers were in working order. Extra linens and hygiene supplies were present. The facility had sufficient space and equipment to facilitate dining, laundry, visitation, meetings, and client activities. The facility contained at least 2 days of perishable food, and at least 7 days non-perishable food, all safely stored. Cooking, dining equipment, and utensils were present. No toxic chemicals or poisons were accessible to residents. Medications were labeled, as required, and stored in locked areas. No pools or bodies of water exist on the premises. Per Caregiver Hamto, no firearms or ammunition are kept at the facility. Carbon monoxide detectors, emergency lighting, and facility telephone were all in working order. Fire extinguisher(s) were serviced within the last 12 months. First aid kit(s) were complete and readily accessible. Required licensing postings were observed in visible areas of the facility. LPA reviewed facility records. The files reviewed by LPA contained required documents. Confidential records were stored in locked areas. No deficiencies were cited during the inspection. An exit interview was conducted with Administrator Alvi to whom a copy of this report and the Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC9058 03/22) were provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 4, 2024
20231 state visit · 1 document
Dec 28, 2023Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Mark Mandel and Daniel Pena conducted an unannounced visit to the facility. The purpose of the visit was to complete a One-year Required Annual inspection. LPA Mandel reviewed the facility file prior to inspection. LPAs were granted entry into the facility by Nian Hamto, Caregiver after identifying themselves and stating the purpose of the inspection. Administrator, Muhammad Alvi later joined LPAs. All staff present received criminal history clearance. Per the license, the facility is approved to serve six (6) non-ambulatory elderly adults, age range 60 and over. Hospice waiver for six (6). At the time of the visit, the facility had six (6) residents in care and two (2) staff present. The facility sketch was reviewed and is consistent with the layout of the facility. The fire inspection requirements for non-ambulatory residents is in accordance with the approved fire inspection. LPAs, accompanied by Caregiver, Roy Antes, conducted a tour of the facility, inside and out. During today’s inspection, the facility’s ambient temperature was measured at 73 degrees F. Carbon monoxide detector and smoke alarms were operational and met statutory standards. No pools or bodies of water were observed. Exterior and interior passageways were free from obstructions. According to Administrator Alvi, there are no weapons and/or ammunition stored on the premises. Disinfectants and cleaning solutions are inaccessible to residents, and poisons are locked. Each resident had clean linen in good repair and sufficient hygiene products for personal use. All residents’ rooms were equipped with required furnishings to meet their needs. There are sufficient lamps or lights in all rooms. Resident bathrooms contain the required furnishings and were in a safe, sanitary, and operational condition. Hot water temperature at faucets for residents’ use were measured at 105.5 degrees and 110. degrees Fahrenheit. Facility has a two-day supply of perishable and a seven-day supply of nonperishable food items. Food was observed to be properly stored. Medications were stored in a safe and locked place and were labeled and kept in compliance with label instructions. Employee records review verified that all staff have Criminal Record Clearance, Criminal Record Statement, and required training. Resident records reviewed for a current Physician's Report, Resident Appraisal, Needs & Services Plan (IPP), Admissions Agreement, and Centrally Stored Medication. The facility conducts emergency drills regularly and the last one was conducted on November 27, 2023. The emergency disaster plan was observed and reviewed. Based on today’s inspection, no deficiencies were observed in the areas evaluated. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report and Licensee Rights - LIC 9058 (rev. 01/16) were provided to Administrator, Alvi, whose signature on this form acknowledges receipt of these documents.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 28, 2023
Earlier years2021 to 2023 · 4 documents
20231 state visit · 2 documents
Feb 27, 2023Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Facility did not issue resident a full refund
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Marisela Garcia-Centeno conducted an unannounced complaint investigation visit to open and investigation and to deliver findings on the above allegation. LPA was granted entry by Caregiver, Marjon Saberdo LPA discussed the purpose of the visit and the basic elements of the allegation mentioned above with Administrator, Zohaib Alvi. The Department investigated the above listed complaint allegation. The investigation consisted, consisted of review of facility records, and interviews with facility staff, and outside sources. On February 22, 2023, Community Care Licensing (CCL) received a complaint alleging that facility did not refund money owed after resident’s death, specifically that a resident (R1), [an LIC 811 Confidential Names List was provided to staff to identify the Resident], did not get a full refund. (Continue on LIC812C) Substantiated (Continue from LIC812) Review of R1’s signed Admission Agreement indicated that R1 moved into the facility on August 7, 2022. On September 5, 2022, R1 passed away and R1’s personal belongings were subsequently removed from the facility on September 6, 2022. Outside sources and staff confirmed R1’s personal belongings were taken out of R1’s room on September 6, 2022. On September 1, 2022, R1’s Power of Attorney (POA) paid the full rate of $6,000 for the month of September 2022. On October 1, 2022, staff reimbursed R1’s POA 50% of the monthly rate or $3,000. Review of the Admissions Agreement indicated the facility’s policy for reimbursement was stated as, “in the event, where/if resident expires before the 10th of the month, POA will only receive the refund for the second half of the month. The resident dies on or after the 10th of the month, there will be no refund applicable in that case”. However, according to Title 22 regulations, admission agreements shall not contain any provision that violates the rights of any residents including refund of fees paid. Specifically, according regulations, a refund of any fees paid in advance covering the time after the resident’s personal property has been removed from the facility shall be issued to R1’s POA, within 15 days after the personal property is removed. Based on review of records, and interviews with staff and outside sources, R1’s was entitled for a full reimbursement of $4,800. In addition, records review indicated that Licensee did not reimburse R1 the reimbursement within 15 days after R1's personal belongings were removed. Therefore, this allegation is substantiated, as there is a preponderance of evidence to show the violation occurred. Pursuant to the California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6, deficiency is being cited on the attached LIC9099D and a plan of correction was jointly developed with Administrator. An exit interview was conducted; a copy of this report, LIC811 and Licensee's Rights (LIC9058) were provided to Administrator, Zohaib Alvi.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 27, 2023 · control 08-AS-20230222141308
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: HSC 1569.652 · Plan of correction due date: Mar 6, 2023
1569.652(c) Termination of admission agreement upon death of resident,... refund of fees paid.... A refund of any fees paid in advance covering the time after the resident’s personal property has been removed from the facility shall be issued to the POA, ... within 15 days after the personal property is removed. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews and record review, the licensee did not provide full reimbursement to 1 of 5, which posed a personal rights risk to 1 of x residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 27, 2023
Plan of correction: Licensee agreed to refund the sum of $1,800 to R1's POA; certified mail receipt and copy of cashier's check will be sent to LPA as proof by POC date of 3/6/2023.
Feb 27, 2023Facility evaluation reportCase Management - DeficienciesDeficiency page: Type B
Type of visit: Case Management - Deficiencies
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Marisela Garcia-Centeno, conducted a case management visit to cite for a violation investigated during a separate complaint. LPA discussed the purpose of the visit with Administrator, Zohaib Alvi. On February 22, 2023, a review of the Admissions Agreement indicated that it contained provisions that violate the rights of residents. The facility’s policy for reimbursement was stated in the Admission Agreement as, “in the event, where/if resident expires before the 10th of the month, POA will only receive the refund for the second half of the month. The resident dies on or after the 10th of the month, there will be no refund applicable in that case”. However, according to Title 22 regulations, admission agreements shall not contain any provision that violates the rights of any residents, including refund of fees paid. Pursuant to the California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6, deficiency is being cited on the attached LIC809D and a plan of correction was jointly developed with Administrator. Zohaib Alvi. An exit interview was conducted with Administrator, Alvi, to whom a copy of the report and Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC 9058 01/16) were provided at the conclusion of the visit.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 27, 2023
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87507(h)(4) · Plan of correction due date: Mar 15, 2023
87507(h)(4) Admission Agreement Admission Agreements: (h)The admission agreement shall not contain...: (4) Any provision that violates the rights of any residents...specified...in Health and Safety Code section 1569 et seq. This requirement was not met by: Based on interviews and record review, the licensee included unlawful provisions in the Admissions Agreement which posed a personal rights risk to x of x residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 27, 2023
Plan of correction: Licensee agreed to revise the Admission Agreement to not include provisions that violates the rights of any residents per HSC section 1569 et seq. Licensee will submit a revised Admission Agreement to CCL for review and approval by POC date of 3/15/2023,
20212 state visits · 2 documents
Dec 23, 2021Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Ramon Serrano, conducted an unannounced Required 1 - Year Visit. The facility file was reviewed prior to the visit. LPA met with Administrator Muhammad Alvi and discussed the purpose of the visit. All staff present have a current criminal record clearance. LPA conducted a tour of the facility, both inside and outside and observed the residents in care. In accordance with the Department’s Infection Control, LPA provided technical assistance, evaluated, and observed the facility's implementation of their mitigation plan to include disinfection, testing surveillance, and screening protocols as well as the use of personal protective equipment. No deficiencies were cited or observed on this date. The Licensee will be provided a copy of their appeal rights (LIC9058 01/16). An exit interview was conducted with Muhammad Alvi and a copy of this report will be emailed to the Licensee with an electronic read receipt as confirmation of documents.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 23, 2021
Nov 23, 2021Facility evaluation reportCase Management - OtherReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Other
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Ramon Serrano and County of San Diego Public Health Nurse Jennifer West conducted an on-site HAI assessment visit. LPA Serrano and team identified themselves and discussed the purpose of the visit with Administrator Muhammad Alvi. The Department conducted an on-site visit to provide technical assistance and to evaluate the facility's mitigation plan to include disinfection, testing, vaccination, and screening protocols as well as the use of personal protective equipment (PPE). During today's visit, LPA Serrano and Nurse Jennifer conducted a walk-though of the facility. A debriefing was conducted with Muhammad Alvi at the conclusion of the visit. No deficiencies were cited during today's visit. An exit interview was conducted with Muhammad Alvi and a copy of this report, along with Licensee Rights (LIC 9058 01/16), were provided to PD, via electronic mail. An electronic receipt of confirmation was requested to be sent by the PD upon receipt of the documents.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 23, 2021
3 of 6 beds were occupied at the June 11, 2026 state visit — a count on that day, not an opening.
License holder
Rnz Quality Care, licensed since 2019.
Operates 5 licensed homes in California. Running more than one home is common and is neither good nor bad on its own.
- Temple Park Living · Murrieta
- Temple Heights · Murrieta
- Temple Gardens · Murrieta
- Temple Court · Murrieta
The state’s totals for this licenseSince 2019, as the state’s facility page counts them
- State visits on file
- 9
- Total complaints
- 3
- Substantiated allegations
- 4
- Type A citations
- 1
- Type B citations
- 3
These are the state’s own totals for this license since 2019, per CDSS records. The state counts them apart from the documents above, and they can differ from what those documents show; the documents say what each visit found. One complaint can contain several allegations.
Compare with homes the same size
| This home | Typical | |
|---|---|---|
| Type A citations | 1 | 0 |
| Type B citations | 3 | 0 |
| Substantiated allegations | 4 | 0 |
| Total complaints | 3 | 0 |
“Typical” is the statewide median for licensed homes this size. It does not adjust for years licensed, and older licenses have had more visits and reports. The median is across the 6,916 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record. The figures compared are the state’s totals, not the documents.
What the state’s words mean
CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents stand in their place.
Frequently asked questions
A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.
Quick answers about Villa Florenza
Is Villa Florenza licensed?
The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
How many residents is Villa Florenza licensed for?
6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Has Villa Florenza been cited?
1 Type A and 3 Type B citations since 2019, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. Those records count 9 state visits over the same years.
Is Villa Florenza still open?
The state does not list this license as closed, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
What does Villa Florenza cost?
$5,200 a month to start — listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026.
The home lists this starting rate on Seniorly for assisted living shared bedroom, seen September 9, 2026.
Among 17 other homes of a similar licensed size in Oceanside that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $4,500 to $6,000 a month, and the middle figure is $5,000 (n = 17 other homes publishing a starting rate).
Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.
A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.
The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.
A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.
Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
Does Villa Florenza take Medi-Cal?
On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated October 1, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
Who holds the license?
The license is held by Rnz Quality Care, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. See the homes licensed to Rnz Quality Care — at least 5 on the state roster.
Is there a hospital nearby?
Sharp Tri-City Medical Center is 3.9 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.
Can Villa Florenza keep a resident on hospice?
Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 6 residents, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Villa Florenza license and inspection record
- Name on the license: “VILLA FLORENZA”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
- License #374604215. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- Licensed for 6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- Licensed to Rnz Quality Care, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- First licensed in 2019, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- 9 state inspection visits since 2019, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- 1 Type A and 3 Type B citations on file since 2019, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. The same records count 9 state visits in that period.
- 3 complaints and 4 substantiated allegations on file since 2019, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
- The most recent state visit on file is September 9, 2026, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗
Nearby
Other homes nearby
Licensed homes near this one in San Diego County, most information on file first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.
- Map
Starting rate
$4,800 a month to start
Listed by the home on its own website · October 27, 2026On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Starting rate
$5,000 a month to start
Listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Starting rate
$5,500 a month to start
Listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$4,900 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $3,800–$6,250On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$4,700 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $3,850–$5,800On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$5,000 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $4,100–$6,200On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
Street maps © Protomaps · © OpenStreetMap
Explore San Diego County