Illustration — no photo of this home on file yet

Weaver's Lilac Villa

Small home·Licensed for 6·Oceanside, California

Licensed since 2022Licence #374604516
  • Care approvals on fileWheelchair · Hospice · BedriddenState licensing record · September 27, 2026
  • Starting rate$6,000 a monthListed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026
  • Home sizeLicensed for 6Small care home · a licensed care home (RCFE)
  • Room at the last state visit6 of 6 beds occupiedJune 19, 2025 · not a current opening
  • Ways to payAsk the homeMedi-Cal ALW participation not on file
  • Last state visitJune 18, 2026CDSS inspection record
  • Licence holderWeaver Senior Care, Inc.Since 2022 · 3 licensed homes

Weaver's Lilac Villa is a small care home in Oceanside — a licensed residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE), the licence category behind “assisted living” and “board and care.” It is licensed for 6 residents since 2022. Dementia care is not on file.

Built from CDSS public records · September 27, 2026. Every fact below names its source and date.

Quick answers and the state record

A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

Quick answers about Weaver's Lilac Villa

Is Weaver's Lilac Villa licensed?

The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

How many residents is Weaver's Lilac Villa licensed for?

6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Has Weaver's Lilac Villa been cited?

0 Type A and 0 Type B citations since 2022, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. Those records count 11 state visits over the same years.

Is Weaver's Lilac Villa still open?

This license was on the CDSS roster as of September 28, 2026.

What does Weaver's Lilac Villa cost?

$6,000 a month to start — listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026.

The home lists this starting rate on Seniorly for assisted living private room, seen September 9, 2026.

Among 18 other homes of a similar licensed size in Oceanside that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $4,500 to $6,000 a month, and the middle figure is $5,000 (n = 18 other homes publishing a starting rate).

Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.

A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.

The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.

A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.

Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.

Does Weaver's Lilac Villa take Medi-Cal?

On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.

Who holds the license?

The license is held by Weaver Senior Care, Inc., per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. See the homes licensed to Weaver Senior Care, Inc. — at least 5 on the state roster.

Is there a hospital nearby?

Sharp Tri-City Medical Center is 4.4 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.

Can Weaver's Lilac Villa keep a resident on hospice?

Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 6 residents, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Weaver's Lilac Villa license and inspection record

  • Name on the license: “WEAVER'S LILAC VILLA”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
  • License #374604516. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • Licensed for 6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • Licensed to Weaver Senior Care, Inc., per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • First licensed in 2022, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • 11 state inspection visits since 2022, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • 0 Type A and 0 Type B citations on file since 2022, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. The same records count 11 state visits in that period.
  • 1 complaint and 0 substantiated allegations on file since 2022, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
  • The most recent state visit on file is June 18, 2026, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
Type A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗

See the state’s own record

Can they support the care needed?

California licenses a home for specific kinds of care. The state’s record lists what this home is approved for; the home’s own answers fill in what changes as needs change.

  • Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved · covers up to 5 residents
  • Dementia / memory careNot on file · ask the home
  • Hospice careApproved · covers up to 6 residents
  • BedriddenApproved · covers up to 1 resident

State licensing record · September 27, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.

Read the state’s own wording
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. APPROVED FOR 5 NONAMBULATORY AND 1 BEDRIDDEN RESIDENT. BEDRIDDEN RESIDENT SHALL BE IN BEDROOM #1. APPROVED FOR 6 HOSPICE RESIDENTS.

935 - ELDERLY

CDSS record, verbatim · September 27, 2026

As needs change

  • Staying through hospice

    Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 6 — care may continue at the end of life

    Ask: “If hospice is needed, can care continue here until the end?”

    State licensing record · September 27, 2026

4 more questions to ask the home
  • Two-person transfers or a lift

    Not on file

    Ask: “If two people or a lift are needed to transfer, can the person stay?”

  • Someone awake overnight

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?”

  • Medicines

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who manages the medicines, and what happens when a dose is missed?”

  • If memory loss develops

    Dementia-care designation not on file

    Ask: “If memory loss develops, what would change — and when would a move be needed?”

What it costs here

This home’s starting rate

$6,000a month to start

Listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026 · See listing

Likely monthly total

$6,000a month

Likely $6,000–$6,600

With a shared room and basic help.

An estimate for planning, not a quote. The price is made in the phone call.

See the full cost breakdownRoom, care and fees · how people pay · where the price comes from
Room
Daily care
Sharing the room

Memory care is not priced here: a dementia-care designation is not on file for this home. Ask the home.

  • Starting monthly rate$6,000this home

    The home lists this starting rate on Seniorly for assisted living private room, seen September 9, 2026.

  • Shared room insteadAsknot on file

    This home’s listed starting rate is for assisted living private room. A shared room, if one is offered, may cost less — ask.

  • Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600

    Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (45 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).

  • One-time move-in fee$2,000one time · likely $0–$4,000

    Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,000 (134 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.

Likely monthly totalLikely $6,000–$6,600
$6,000
First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $6,000–$10,100
$8,000

Lines marked “Ask” are not in the totals.

How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
  • Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
  • Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
  • SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
  • VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
  • Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
  • MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
If the money runs out, what Medi-Cal covers
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
  • The care level

    Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.

  • What is billed separately

    Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.

  • Move-in costs

    A one-time community fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.

  • Increases

    California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.

  • What is the full monthly cost for the room and care we need, and what does it include?
  • What would the next care level cost, and who decides when it changes?
  • What is billed separately, and is there a one-time fee or deposit at move-in?
  • Is any private-pay period required before another payment program can begin?
How this estimate worksWhere this price comes from

The home lists this starting rate on Seniorly for assisted living private room, seen September 9, 2026.

13 homes like this within 3 miles publish starting rates mostly between $3,500–$5,850.

  • Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
  • Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
  • Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
  • Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
  • We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
  • It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Show the 13 nearby homes behind this estimate

Where it is

  • 49 Avenida Descanso, Oceanside, CA 92057Address from the public record · September 27, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.

Opening the neighborhood map…

The state record

California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. Here are the dated documents and the state’s own words, beside what is typical for homes this size.

Since 2022, the state has filed 11 documents for this home, and its records count 11 visits since 2022. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated June 18, 2026.

On file since
2022
State visits
11
Most recent visit
June 18, 2026
Occupied · June 19, 2025 visit
6 of 6 bedsa count on that day, not an opening

We hold 1 complaint report the state published for this home, dated June 19, 2025. 1 of the 1 carries the state's recorded outcome word: “Unsubstantiated” (1). 1 includes the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word. Summary composed by computer from the 1 complaint report below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

Beside homes the same size

  • Type A citations0typical 0
  • Type B citations0typical 0
  • Substantiated allegations0typical 0
  • Total complaints1typical 0

“Typical” is the statewide median across the 6,808 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this licence since 2022.

Year by year
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated2026110202525020241102022440

The last 36 months — 7 of 11 documents

20261 state visit · 1 document
Jun 18, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Arian Golbakhsh conducted an unannounced, required Annual Inspection. The facility file and personnel report was reviewed prior to the visit. LPA was welcomed by, identified themselves to, and discussed the purpose of the visit to Caregivers Liza Cruz and Lucy Luo. Administrator Juliane Cruz arrived shortly after LPA, joining halfway through the physical walk through of the home. The facility's license shows a maximum capacity of six (6) residents, where one (1) of which may be bedridden. Bedridden may only reside in bedroom #1. Additionally the facility is approved for six (6) hospice waivers. During today’s inspection there were six (6) residents in care, with three (3) on hospice. LPA, Caregiver Luo, and Administrator Cruz toured the interior and exterior of the facility and inspected each room. The facility was clean, sanitary, and in good repair. Pathways were free of obstruction and slip hazards. Client bedrooms contained the required furnishings. Doors, windows, screens, toilets, and showers were in working order. Hot water temperature at taps accessible to clients were all compliant: Common bathroom sink by front entryway was 110.1F. Extra linens and hygiene supplies were present, as well as Personal Protective Equipment. The facility had sufficient space and equipment to facilitate dining, laundry, visitation, meetings, and client activities. The facility contained at least two (2) days of perishable food, and at least seven (7) days non-perishable food, all safely stored. Cooking, dining equipment, and utensils were present. Knives were locked and inaccessible to residents in care. [Continued on LIC 809-C] [Continued from LIC 809] No toxic chemicals or poisons were accessible to clients. Medications were labeled, as required, and stored in locked areas. No pools or bodies of water exist on the premises. Per Administrator Cruz, no firearms or ammunition are kept at the facility. Smoke and carbon monoxide detectors, emergency lighting, and facility telephone were all in working order. Fire extinguisher was purchased within the last 12 months, dated for October 2025. First aid kit was complete and readily accessible. Required licensing postings were observed in visible areas of the facility. LPA interviewed two (2) staff and one (1) client, and interviews did not reveal any licensing or regulatory concerns. LPA reviewed facility records. The files reviewed by LPA contained required documents. Confidential records were stored in locked areas. No deficiencies were cited during the inspection. An exit interview was conducted with Administrator Cruz to whom a copy of this report and the Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC 9058) were provided. Their signature below confirms receipt of these documents.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 18, 2026
20252 state visits · 5 documents
Jul 15, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: POC

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Rebecca Borunda conducted a plan of correction visit. LPA was greeted by, identified herself to, and explained the purpose of the visit to Administrator Juliane Cruz. The purpose of the visit was to verify if the two deficiencies issued on 6/19/2025 had been corrected. On 6/19/2025, the licensee was issued a deficiency of regulation 87615(a)(2) with a correction due date of 6/27/2025 and a deficiency of regulation 87465(e) with a correction due date of 7/7/2025. As of today’s date, 7/15/2025, the Department had not received proof of correction for either deficiency. According to Administrator Cruz, POC paperwork had been faxed to the Department on 6/27/2025 and 6/30/2025, however there were issues with the fax machine and LPA Borunda did not receive the POC documents. During today’s visit, LPA Borunda reviewed resident and staff paperwork. Review of Resident 1's paperwork revealed that R1 was admitted to hospice services on 6/26/2025, which means that an exception request for R1's prohibited health condition is no longer required. Therefore, deficiency 87615(a)(2) has been corrected. Review of staff training paperwork revealed that staff received medication training on 6/26/2025. Therefore, deficiency 87465(e) has been corrected. LPA provided Administrator with letters of Deficiency Cleared for both deficiencies. An exit interview was conducted with Licensee Tonya Weaver via telephone and Administrator Juliane Cruz, whose signature below confirms receipt of a copy of this report, the Letters of Deficiency Cleared, and the Licensee Appeal Rights (LIC9058 3/22).the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 15, 2025
Jun 19, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Questionable Death

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Rebecca Borunda conducted an unannounced complaint visit to deliver findings regarding the above-mentioned allegation. LPA identified herself to, was greeted by, and explained the purpose of the visit to Administrator Juliane Cruz. The Department’s investigation consisted of interviews with residents and staff, review of facility records, and a tour of the facility. It was alleged that a medication error resulted in Resident 1’s (R1) death. Review of R1’s assessment records dated June 2022 and interviews with staff revealed that R1 had a diagnosis of esophageal cancer, had a tracheostomy, was not confused or disoriented, but was able to communicate needs and follow instructions. Review of R1’s medical records from April 2023 and assessment records dated June 2022 revealed that R1 was receiving hospice services for esophageal cancer and was discharged from hospice services in December 2022. Continued on LIC9099-C page... Unsubstantiated Review of R1’s medication list for May 2023 revealed that R1 had been prescribed numerous medications, including one routine pain medication and five as needed (PRN) medications for pain relief, one of which was the pain medication hydromorphon 2mg. Review of R1’s medication list between November 2022 and May 2023 revealed that R1 was prescribed hydromorphon 2mg as needed every 2 hours. Interviews with staff revealed that the facility did not keep a Medication Administration Record (MAR) for routine medications, but did maintain a MAR for PRN medications, including R1’s hydromorphon. Interviews with staff and review of R1’s death certificate revealed that R1 had a surgical operation to correct a complication from R1’s tracheostomy on 5/11/2023. Review of R1’s MAR for hydromorphon revealed that following R1’s surgery on 5/11/2023, R1 was given 2mg hydromorphon on 5/13/2023 at 11:30am and 2:00pm. R1 received additional doses of hydromorphon at 5:00pm, 8:00pm and 11:00pm, however, those doses had a handwritten note next to each dose that the dose given was 3mg. On the following page of R1’s MAR, another handwritten note stated that the doctor changed the dose and frequency to 3mg every 3 hours. The MAR revealed that R1 received 3mg of hydromorphon approximately 3 hours apart. Interviews with staff revealed that R1 was very aware of R1’s medication schedule and routine, and would frequently ask for their prescribed medications, including pain medications more often than the medication was allowed by the doctor’s order. Review of R1’s death certificate revealed that R1’s cause of death was listed as tongue cancer, and did not list any conditions related to medications contributing to R1’s death. The Department has investigated the above-mentioned allegation and based on interviews and records review, the preponderance of the evidence has not been met, therefore, this allegation is deemed unsubstantiated. An exit interview was conducted with Administrator Juliane Cruz, whose signature below confirms receipt of a copy of this report and the Licensee Appeal Rights (LIC9058 3/22).the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 19, 2025 · control 08-AS-20240904091815
Jun 19, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Other

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Rebecca Borunda conducted an unannounced case management visit to deliver an amended LIC9099 report. LPA was greeted by, identified herself to, and explained the purpose of the visit with Caregiver Syueer "Lucy" Luo. Administrator Juliane Cruz arrived during the visit. During today’s visit, LPA obtained Juliane Cruz’s signature on the amended complaint report dated 9/11/2024. An exit interview was conducted with Administrator Juliane Cruz, whose signature below confirms receipt of a copy of this report and the Licensee Appeal Rights (LIC9058 3/22).the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 19, 2025
Jun 19, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Deficiencies

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Rebecca Borunda conducted an unannounced case management visit to cite for a deficiency discovered during a complaint visit that is unrelated to the complaint allegation. LPA identified herself to, was greeted by, and explained the purpose of the visit to Administrator Juliane Cruz. During the unrelated complaint visit, it was determined that Resident 1's (R1) file did not contain a written doctor's order for a medication change. Review of R1’s medication list between November 2022 and May 2023 revealed that R1 was prescribed hydromorphon 2mg as needed every 2 hours and to not exceed 12 doses within 24 hours. Review of R1’s Medication Administration Record (MAR) for hydromorphon revealed that following R1’s surgery on 5/11/2023, R1 was given 2mg hydromorphon on 5/13/2023 at 11:30am and 2:00pm. R1 received additional doses of hydromorphon at 5:00pm, 8:00pm and 11:00pm, however, those doses had a handwritten note next to each dose that the dose given was 3mg. On the following page of R1’s MAR, another handwritten note stated that the doctor changed the dose and frequency to 3mg every 3 hours. The MAR revealed that R1 received 3mg of hydromorphon approximately 3 hours apart. Review of R1’s physician’s orders revealed that R1 did not have any written orders to change the dose and frequency of hydromorphon. Therefore, a deficiency regarding written doctor's orders is being cited per California Code of Regulations Title 22 and noted on the attached LIC809-D page. An exit interview was conducted with Administrator Juliane Cruz, whose signature below confirms receipt of a copy of this report, and the Licensee Appeal Rights (LIC9058 3/22).the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 19, 2025

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87465(e) · Plan of correction due date: Jul 7, 2025

87465 Incidental Medical and Dental Care (e) For every prescription and nonprescription PRN medication...there shall be a signed, dated written order from a physician... maintained in the residents file... This requirement has not been met as evidenced by: Based on record review, the licensee did not ensure that R1's file had a written doctor's order for R1's PRN pain medication after the doctor updated the prescription. This posed a potential health risk to 1 of 6 residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 19, 2025

Plan of correction: Administrator stated that staff will not follow doctor's verbal orders until the facility has a copy of the written doctors order for all medications or changes in dose and frequency. Administrator will provide in-service training for staff regarding medication administration and doctor's orders and provide the training sign in sheet to the Department by POC due date of 7/7/2025.

Jun 19, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Rebecca Borunda conducted an unannounced Required 1-Year visit. The facility file was reviewed prior to the visit. LPA was greeted by, identified herself to, and explained the purpose of the visit with Administrator Juliane Cruz. LPA spoke with Licensee Tonya Weaver via telephone during the visit. The facility is licensed for a maximum capacity of 6 nonambulatory residents, 1 of which may be bedridden in bedroom #1. The facility has a waiver for 6 hospice residents. During today’s visit, the facility had a census of 6 non-ambulatory residents. The Administrator for the facility is Juliane Cruz and their certificate was valid and current. During today’s visit, LPA toured the facility and inspected each room of the facility, including resident and staff rooms, bathrooms for resident and staff use, kitchen, garage, common areas, and outside space. No bodies of water were observed on the premises. LPA did not observe any aspects of delayed egress or secured perimeter. The facility was found to be clean, safe, and in good repair with no pathway obstructions. The facility’s water temperature was measured at 107.4 and 106.0 degrees Fahrenheit in common bathrooms. The facility’s internal temperature was measured at 79 degrees Fahrenheit. LPA observed locked storage for all hazardous and/or toxic chemicals and were stored separately from food supplies. According to Juliane Cruz, no firearms or weapons are stored on the premises. LPA also observed locked storage for resident medications and resident and staff files. Resident medications are stored in their original container and labelled. LPA observed a minimum of a 2-day supply of perishable food and a 7-day supply of non-perishable food present at the facility. Continued on LIC809-C page… The facility refrigerator was kept at 36 degrees Fahrenheit, and the facility freezer was kept at 0 degrees Fahrenheit. LPA observed linens and hygiene products provided to the residents that are in good repair and sufficient to meet their needs. Staff present at the facility during the time of the inspection had a criminal background clearance, were associated to the facility, and had a first aid certificate. LPA reviewed multiple resident and staff records. Each staff file was complete and contained a personnel record, first aid certificate, fingerprint clearance and association, and a health screening. Each resident record was complete and contained a signed admission agreement, initial medical assessment, updated annual reappraisal, documents regarding safeguarding personal property, and personal rights. Review of Resident 1's (R1) medical and care assessments as well as discharge paperwork dated April 2025 revealed that R1 had a diagnosis of a gastronomy tube and was only receiving home health services. Interviews with the Administrator and Licensee confirmed that R1 was not receiving hospice services and caregivers had been trained by home health staff on proper gastronomy tube care. LPA provided guidance and consultation with Administrator regarding regulation changes that became effective 1/1/2025. The following deficiency was cited for prohibited health conditions and noted on the attached LIC809-D page. An exit interview was conducted with Licensee Tonya Weaver and Administrator Juliane Cruz, whose signature below confirms receipt of a copy of this report and the Licensee Appeal Rights (LIC9058 3/22).the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 19, 2025
20241 state visit · 1 document
Mar 27, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Rebecca Ruiz conducted an unannounced Required 1-Year visit. The facility file was reviewed prior to the visit. LPA was greeted by, identified herself to, and explained the purpose of the visit with Caregiver Julianemarie Cruz. Administrator Tonya Weaver arrived during the visit. The facility is licensed for a maximum capacity of 6 non-ambulatory residents, 1 of which may be bedridden. The facility has a waiver for 6 hospice residents. During today’s visit, the facility had a total census of 6 residents, 5 non-ambulatory residents and 1 ambulatory resident. LPA did not observe any aspects of delayed egress or secured perimeter. On 3/4/2024, the Department received a Change of Administrator request for Lisa Anderson-Hines and the change request is still pending with the Department. Anderson-Hines certificate was valid and current. During today’s visit, LPA toured the facility and inspected each room of the facility, including resident and staff rooms, bathrooms for resident and staff use, kitchen, garage, common areas, and outside space. No bodies of water were observed on the premises. The facility was found to be clean, safe, and in good repair with no pathway obstructions. The facility’s water temperature was measured at 110.7 degrees Fahrenheit and 117.1 degrees Fahrenheit in two common bathrooms. The facility’s internal temperature was measured at 72 degrees Fahrenheit. LPA observed locked storage for all hazardous and/or toxic chemicals and were stored separately from food supplies. According to Weaver, no firearms or weapons are stored on the premises. LPA also observed locked storage for resident medications and resident and staff files. Resident medications are stored in their original container and label. LPA observed a 2-day supply of perishable food and a 7-day supply of non-perishable food present at the facility. The facility refrigerator was kept at 36 degrees Fahrenheit, and the facility freezer was kept at -10 degrees Fahrenheit. LPA observed linens and hygiene products provided to the residents that are in good repair and sufficient to meet their needs. Continued on LIC809-C page… Staff present at the facility during the time of the inspection had a criminal background clearance, were associated to the facility, and had a first aid certificate. LPA reviewed multiple resident and staff records. Each resident record was complete and contained a signed admission agreement, updated physician’s report and medical assessment, documents regarding safeguarding personal property and personal rights. Each staff file was complete and contained a personnel record, first aid certificate, fingerprint clearance and association, and a health screening. LPA spoke with staff and residents present at the facility during the time of the inspection and those interviews did not reveal any licensing or regulatory concerns. The Administrator will submit copies of the LIC500 Personnel Report, LIC610E Disaster Plan, facility sketch, and current liability insurance to the Department within 15 business days. No deficiencies were cited on today’s date. An exit interview was conducted with Administrator Tonya Weaver, whose signature below confirms receipt of a copy of this report and the Licensee Appeal Rights (LIC9058 3/22).the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 27, 2024
What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedthere was not enough evidence to prove a violation occurred — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe evidence showed the allegation was false, could not have happened, or had no reasonable basisType A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗

An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents and the questions below stand in their place.

Who holds the licence

Weaver Senior Care, Inc., licensed since 2022, operates 3 licensed homes in California. Running more than one home is common and is neither good nor bad on its own.

Life here

Rooms, meals, the rhythm of a day, faith and language, pets and house rules — as the home describes them. Tap any detail for its source and date; nothing here is graded.

The home has not described daily life anywhere we have reviewed yet — that is the case for most small homes, and it says nothing about the home. These questions fill in the picture; keep the ones that matter to you.

Before you call

Ask every home the same questions — the state’s record does not answer these. Keep the ones that matter and they travel with your saved homes.

  1. What is included in the monthly rate, and what costs extra?
  2. Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?
  3. Which rooms does the non-ambulatory approval cover, and what transfer support is provided?
  4. What could change whether someone can stay here?
  5. Can we see a bedroom and share a meal during a visit?

Other homes nearby

The nearest licensed homes in San Diego County, closest first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.

Explore San Diego County