Illustration — no photo of this home on file yet

Blue Skies of Oceanside

Small home·Licensed for 6·Oceanside, California

Licensed since 2020Licence #374604304
  • Care approvals on fileWheelchair · HospiceState licensing record · September 27, 2026
  • Starting rate$4,500 a monthListed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026
  • Home sizeLicensed for 6Small care home · a licensed care home (RCFE)
  • Room at the last state visit4 of 6 beds occupiedApril 30, 2024 · not a current opening
  • Ways to payAsk the homeMedi-Cal ALW participation not on file
  • Last state visitJune 18, 2026CDSS inspection record
  • Licence holderJcmy Care Homes LLCSince 2020 · 3 licensed homes

Blue Skies of Oceanside is a small care home in Oceanside — a licensed residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE), the licence category behind “assisted living” and “board and care.” It is licensed for 6 residents since 2020. Dementia care and bedridden care are not on file.

Built from CDSS public records · September 27, 2026. Every fact below names its source and date.

Quick answers and the state record

A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

Quick answers about Blue Skies of Oceanside

Is Blue Skies of Oceanside licensed?

The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

How many residents is Blue Skies of Oceanside licensed for?

6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Has Blue Skies of Oceanside been cited?

0 Type A and 1 Type B citation since 2020, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. Those records count 11 state visits over the same years.

Is Blue Skies of Oceanside still open?

This license was on the CDSS roster as of September 28, 2026.

What does Blue Skies of Oceanside cost?

$4,500 a month to start — listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026.

The home lists this starting rate on Seniorly for assisted living private room, seen September 9, 2026.

Among 18 other homes of a similar licensed size in Oceanside that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $4,500 to $6,000 a month, and the middle figure is $5,100 (n = 18 other homes publishing a starting rate).

Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.

A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.

The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.

A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.

Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.

Does Blue Skies of Oceanside take Medi-Cal?

On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.

Who holds the license?

The license is held by Jcmy Care Homes LLC, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. See the homes licensed to Jcmy Care Homes LLC — at least 2 on the state roster.

Can Blue Skies of Oceanside keep a resident on hospice?

Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 3 residents, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Blue Skies of Oceanside license and inspection record

  • Name on the license: “BLUE SKIES OF OCEANSIDE”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
  • License #374604304. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • Licensed for 6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • Licensed to Jcmy Care Homes LLC, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • First licensed in 2020, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • 11 state inspection visits since 2020, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • 0 Type A and 1 Type B citation on file since 2020, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. The same records count 11 state visits in that period.
  • 4 complaints and 1 substantiated allegation on file since 2020, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
  • The most recent state visit on file is June 18, 2026, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
Type A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗

See the state’s own record

Can they support the care needed?

California licenses a home for specific kinds of care. The state’s record lists what this home is approved for; the home’s own answers fill in what changes as needs change.

  • Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved · covers up to 5 residents
  • Dementia / memory careNot on file · ask the home
  • Hospice careApproved · covers up to 3 residents
  • BedriddenNot on file · ask the home

State licensing record · September 27, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.

Read the state’s own wording
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. ONE (1) AMBULATORY AND FIVE (5) NON-AMBULATORY.HOSPICE WAIVER FOR THREE (3).

935 - ELDERLY

CDSS record, verbatim · September 27, 2026

As needs change

  • Staying through hospice

    Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 3 — care may continue at the end of life

    Ask: “If hospice is needed, can care continue here until the end?”

    State licensing record · September 27, 2026

4 more questions to ask the home
  • Two-person transfers or a lift

    Not on file

    Ask: “If two people or a lift are needed to transfer, can the person stay?”

  • Someone awake overnight

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?”

  • Medicines

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who manages the medicines, and what happens when a dose is missed?”

  • If memory loss develops

    Dementia-care designation not on file

    Ask: “If memory loss develops, what would change — and when would a move be needed?”

Care & day-to-day support

These are the home’s own statements about its day-to-day practice — they are not part of the state licensing record, and the state has not approved or reviewed them.

What it costs here

This home’s starting rate

$4,500a month to start

Listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026 · See listing

Likely monthly total

$4,500a month

Likely $4,500–$5,100

With a shared room and basic help.

An estimate for planning, not a quote. The price is made in the phone call.

See the full cost breakdownRoom, care and fees · how people pay · where the price comes from
Room
Daily care
Sharing the room

Memory care is not priced here: a dementia-care designation is not on file for this home. Ask the home.

  • Starting monthly rate$4,500this home

    The home lists this starting rate on Seniorly for assisted living private room, seen September 9, 2026.

  • Shared room insteadAsknot on file

    This home’s listed starting rate is for assisted living private room. A shared room, if one is offered, may cost less — ask.

  • Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600

    Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (45 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).

  • One-time move-in fee$2,000one time · likely $0–$4,000

    Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,000 (134 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.

Likely monthly totalLikely $4,500–$5,100
$4,500
First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $4,500–$8,600
$6,500

Lines marked “Ask” are not in the totals.

How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
  • Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
  • Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
  • SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
  • VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
  • Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
  • MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
If the money runs out, what Medi-Cal covers
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
  • The care level

    Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.

  • What is billed separately

    Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.

  • Move-in costs

    A one-time community fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.

  • Increases

    California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.

  • What is the full monthly cost for the room and care we need, and what does it include?
  • What would the next care level cost, and who decides when it changes?
  • What is billed separately, and is there a one-time fee or deposit at move-in?
  • Is any private-pay period required before another payment program can begin?
How this estimate worksWhere this price comes from

The home lists this starting rate on Seniorly for assisted living private room, seen September 9, 2026.

13 homes like this within 3 miles publish starting rates mostly between $3,500–$6,000.

  • Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
  • Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
  • Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
  • Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
  • We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
  • It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Show the 13 nearby homes behind this estimate

Where it is

  • 322 Keyport St., Oceanside, CA 92057Address from the public record · September 27, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.

Opening the neighborhood map…

The state record

California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. Here are the dated documents and the state’s own words, beside what is typical for homes this size.

Since 2021, the state has filed 10 documents for this home, and its records count 11 visits since 2020. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated June 18, 2026.

On file since
2021
State visits
11
Most recent visit
June 18, 2026
Occupied · April 30, 2024 visit
4 of 6 bedsa count on that day, not an opening

We hold 4 complaint reports the state published for this home, dated December 17, 2021 to April 30, 2024. 4 of the 4 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (1), “Unfounded” (2), “Unsubstantiated” (1). 4 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word. Summary composed by computer from the 4 complaint reports below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

Beside homes the same size

  • Type A citations0typical 0
  • Type B citations1typical 0
  • Substantiated allegations1typical 0
  • Total complaints4typical 0

“Typical” is the statewide median across the 6,808 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this licence since 2020.

Year by year
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated20261102025110202455120222202021110

The last 36 months — 7 of 10 documents

20261 state visit · 1 document
Jun 18, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Nacole Patterson conducted an unannounced Required Annual Inspection. The facility file was reviewed prior to the visit. LPA was welcomed by and discussed the purpose of the visit to caregiver Teresita Diaz. The facility's license shows a maximum capacity of six (6) residents of which can be one (1) ambulatory and five (5) non-ambulatory residents, ages 60 and over. During today’s inspection there were five (5) residents in care. LPA spoke with Licensees Hong Hanh Le Dao and Yann Coudronniere via phone and House Manager Lauren Delancey arrived later to the facility. LPA and Teresita toured the interior and exterior of the facility and inspected each room. The facility was clean, sanitary, and in good repair. Pathways were free of obstruction and slip hazards. Client bedrooms contained the required furnishings. Doors, windows, screens, toilets, and showers were in working order. Extra linens and hygiene supplies were present, as well as Personal Protective Equipment. The facility had sufficient space and equipment to facilitate dining, laundry, visitation, meetings, and client activities. The facility contained at least 2 days of perishable food, and at least 7 days non-perishable food, all safely stored. Cooking, dining equipment, and utensils were present. No toxic chemicals or poisons were accessible to clients. Medications were labeled, as required, and stored in locked areas. No pools or bodies of water exist on the premises. Per Lauren, no firearms or ammunition are kept at the facility. Carbon monoxide detectors, emergency lighting, and facility telephone were all in working order. Fire extinguisher(s) were serviced within the last 12 months. First aid kit(s) were complete and readily accessible. Required licensing postings were observed in visible areas of the facility. LPA interviewed staff and clients, and reviewed facility records. The files reviewed by LPA contained required documents. Confidential records were stored in locked areas. Deficiencies were cited per California Code of Regulations, Title 22 (refer to the attached LIC 9099-D) regarding two (2) residents being bedridden without an approved clearance, and an unverified TB clearance for a caregiver. A Plan of Correction was jointly developed with the licensee. An exit interview was conducted with House Manager Lauren Delancy, to whom a copy of this report, and the Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC9058 03/22) were provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 18, 2026
20251 state visit · 1 document
Jun 30, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Rebecca Borunda conducted an unannounced Required 1-Year visit. The facility file was reviewed prior to the visit. LPA was greeted by, identified herself to, and explained the purpose of the visit with Caregiver Leonor Gaya. LPA spoke with House Manager Lauren DeLancy via telephone during the visit. The facility is licensed for a maximum capacity of 6 residents, 5 of which may be non-ambulatory. As of 3/14/2024, the facility has a pending fire clearance request to increase the facility's capacity to 6 non-ambulatory residents, 1 of which may be bedridden. The facility also has a pending waiver request for 4 hospice residents. During today’s visit, the facility had a census of 5 non-ambulatory residents. The Administrator for the facility is Rafael Gamab and their certificate was valid and current. During today’s visit, LPA toured the facility and inspected each room of the facility, including resident and staff rooms, bathrooms for resident and staff use, kitchen, garage, common areas, and outside space. No bodies of water were observed on the premises. LPA did not observe any aspects of delayed egress or secured perimeter. The facility was found to be clean, safe, and in good repair with no pathway obstructions. The facility’s water temperature was measured at 107.6 and 107.8 degrees Fahrenheit in common bathrooms. The facility’s internal temperature was measured at 78 degrees Fahrenheit. LPA observed locked storage for all hazardous and/or toxic chemicals and were stored separately from food supplies. LPA also observed locked storage for resident medications and resident and staff files. During the review of the locked medication cabinet, LPA observed the daily medications for all 5 residents were stored in a daily pill box. Interviews with staff revealed that the pill boxes only contained medications for that day. Continued on LIC809-C page… During the tour of the backyard, LPA did not observe any shaded area for resident use. Staff Gaya stated that there used to be tarps that were hung from the roof and poles that used to provide shade to the backyard but they were removed. LPA observed a minimum of a 2-day supply of perishable food and a 7-day supply of non-perishable food present at the facility. The facility refrigerator was kept at 44 degrees Fahrenheit, and the facility freezer was kept at 0 degrees Fahrenheit. LPA observed linens and hygiene products provided to the residents that are in good repair and sufficient to meet their needs. According to Leonor Gaya, no firearms or weapons are stored on the premises. Staff present at the facility during the time of the inspection had a criminal background clearance, were associated to the facility, and had a first aid certificate. LPA reviewed multiple resident and staff records. Each resident record was complete and contained a signed admission agreement, initial medical assessment, updated annual reappraisal, documents regarding safeguarding personal property and personal rights. Each staff file was complete and contained a personnel record, first aid certificate, fingerprint clearance and association, and a health screening. LPA was away from the facility for approximately one hour between 11:50am and 12:50pm. The following two deficiencies were cited for medications not stored in their original container and not having a shaded outdoor area and are noted on the attached LIC809-D page. An exit interview was conducted with Caregiver Leonor Gaya, whose signature below confirms receipt of a copy of this report and the Licensee Appeal Rights (LIC9058 3/22).the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 30, 2025
20245 state visits · 5 documents
Apr 30, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Lack of care resulting in serious injury. Staff did not provide incontinence care.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Liliana Silveira conducted an unannounced complaint investigation visit to deliver findings. LPA Silveira introduced themselves, met with Caregiver Leonor Gaya and disclosed the purpose of the visit. The Department’s investigation consisted of observations and interviews. It was alleged that Resident #1 (R1) suffered a fractured vertebrae while in care at Blue Skies of Oceanside in October of 2021. It was also alleged that R1 was left in soiled clothing for extended periods of time during this same timeframe at Blue Skies of Oceanside. LPA observations from a facility visit conducted on 11/19/21 revealed that R1 did not reside at Blue Skies of Oceanside. An interview with the Administrator on 11/19/21 also revealed that R1 used to reside at Blue Skies of Oceanside, but was transferred to sister facility Blue Skies of San Marcos in October of 2021 to be closer to family. (CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE, LIC 9099-C) Unfounded Department interviews conducted with staff and outside sources also revealed that during the time of the alleged incidents, which allegedly took place in October of 2021, R1 resided at Blue Skies of San Marcos. Based on the Department’s investigation of the above-mentioned allegations and the evidence obtained from observations and interviews, we have found that the complaint was unfounded. An unfounded determination means that the allegation was false, could not have happened and/or is without a reasonable basis. The allegations were not pertinent to this licensed facility. The report was discussed, and an exit interview was conducted with Caregiver Leonor Gaya. A copy of this report along with Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC9058 3/22) was provided to Leonor at the conclusion of the visit. The signature below confirms the receipt of these documents.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 30, 2024 · control 08-AS-20211115114750
Apr 10, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Collateral

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sabel Martinez conducted an unannounced collateral visit to conduct a resident interview. The LPA introduced himself to Caregiver Jemela Magulod, and disclosed to the purpose of the visit. Review of records and an interview with Magulod revealed Resident # 1 (R1) did not reside at the facility. An exit interview was conducted with Caregiver Magulod, to whom a copy of this report, and Licensee/Appeal Rights, were provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 10, 2024
Mar 22, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Other

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Liliana Silveira conducted an unannounced complaint visit to amend a Complaint Investigation Findings report (LIC 9099). LPA was greeted by, identified herself to, and explained the purpose of the visit with Caregiver Leonor Gaya. During today’s visit, LPA amended a Complaint Investigation Findings Report (LIC 9099), dated 02/28/24, for a complaint filed on 11/15/21. The report findings were changed to UNFOUNDED. The findings were changed to unfounded because the dates of the alleged incidents for the resident mentioned in the complaint, were for dates that the resident lived at sister facility Blue Skies of San Marcos (facility #374604305). An exit interview was conducted with Caregiver Leonor Gaya, whose signature below confirms receipt of a copy of this report and the Licensee Appeal Rights (LIC9058 3/22).the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 22, 2024
Mar 14, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Rebecca Ruiz conducted an unannounced Required 1-Year visit. The facility file was reviewed prior to the visit. LPA was greeted by, identified herself to, and explained the purpose of the visit with Caregiver Leonor Gaya. The facility is licensed for a maximum capacity of 6 residents, 5 of which may be non-ambulatory. The facility has a waiver for 3 hospice residents. During today’s visit, the facility had a census of 6 residents, all of which were non-ambulatory. The facility also had 4 residents receiving hospice services. LPA did not observe any aspects of delayed egress or secured perimeter. The Administrator for the facility is Rafael Gamab and their certificate was valid and current. During today’s visit, LPA toured the facility and inspected each room of the facility, including resident and staff rooms, bathrooms for resident and staff use, kitchen, garage, common areas, and outside space. No bodies of water were observed on the premises. The facility was found to be clean, safe, and in good repair with no pathway obstructions. The facility’s water temperature was measured at 134.4 degrees Fahrenheit in a common bathroom. Caregiver Leonor Gaya turned the water heater down and the water temperature was measured at 118.2 degrees Fahrenheit in the same bathroom. The facility’s internal temperature was measured at 73 degrees Fahrenheit. LPA observed locked storage for all hazardous and/or toxic chemicals and were stored separately from food supplies. According to Leonor Gaya, no firearms or weapons are stored on the premises. LPA also observed locked storage for resident medications and resident and staff files. LPA observed pillboxes for 6 residents which contained the medication doses for the noon, pm, and bedtime medication passes for all 6 residents. LPA observed a 2-day supply of perishable food and a 7-day supply of non-perishable food present at the facility. The facility refrigerator was kept at 45 degrees Fahrenheit, and the facility freezer was kept at 0 degrees Fahrenheit. Continued on LIC809-C page… LPA observed linens and hygiene products provided to the residents that are in good repair and sufficient to meet their needs. Staff present at the facility during the time of the inspection had a criminal background clearance, were associated to the facility, and had a first aid certificate. LPA reviewed multiple resident and staff records. Each resident record was complete and contained a signed admission agreement, updated physician’s report and medical assessment, documents regarding safeguarding personal property, and personal rights. Each staff file was complete and contained a personnel record, first aid certificate, fingerprint clearance and association, and a health screening. LPA spoke with staff and residents present at the facility during the time of the inspection and those interviews did not reveal any licensing or regulatory concerns. The Administrator will submit copies of the LIC500 Personnel Report, LIC610E Disaster Plan, and current liability insurance to the Department within 15 business days. The following deficiencies for fire clearance, hospice waivers, medications, and hot water temperature were cited per California Code of Regulations Title 22 and noted on the attached LIC809-D pages. Additionally, a civil penalty for the fire clearance in the amount of $500 is being issued on an LIC421IM. An exit interview was conducted with House Manager Lauren di Lantis via phone and Caregiver Leonor Gaya, whose signature below confirms receipt of a copy of this report, the LIC421IM, and the Licensee Appeal Rights (LIC9058 3/22).the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 14, 2024
Feb 29, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not allow residents to have visitors

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Rebecca Ruiz conducted an unannounced complaint visit to deliver findings regarding the above-mentioned allegation. LPA identified herself to, was greeted by, and explained the purpose of the visit to Caregiver Leonor Gaya. During today's visit, LPA observed residents in care and obtained copies of facility records. The Department’s investigation consisted of interviews with residents, staff, and outside sources, records review, and a tour of the facility. It was alleged that staff did not allow residents to have visitors. Interviews and review of recent medical assessment revealed that Resident 1 (R1) had a diagnosis of major cognitive impairment, was confused and disoriented, and was unable to follow directions or make their needs known. [Caregiver was provided with an LIC811 Confidential Names list to identify R1]. Continued on LIC9099-C page... Substantiated Interviews with residents, staff, and outside sources revealed that due to an outside dispute, facility staff were instructed by outside parties to deny R1 visitation with Outside Party 1 (OP1). Interviews revealed that OP1 was denied visitation with R1 on multiple occasions and that, at the time of when the Department received the complaint, there was no legal order restricting OP1’s ability to visit with R1. Interviews were not able to confirm if R1 had been asked if R1 wanted to see or visit with OP1. Review of a document regarding visitation for R1 revealed that outside parties requested that facility staff restrict visitation to only approved individuals. Interviews did not reveal that staff prevented the visitation of any other residents or outside parties. The Department has investigated the above-mentioned allegation and based on interviews and records review, the preponderance of the evidence has been met, therefore, this allegation is deemed substantiated. The following deficiency is cited per CA Code of Regulations Title 22 and noted on the attached LIC9099-D page. An exit interview was conducted with House Manager Lauren deLantis via telephone and Caregiver Leonor Gaya, whose signature below confirms receipt of a copy of this report, LIC811, and the Licensee Appeal Rights (LIC9058 03/22). Interviews and records review revealed that after the fall, R1 was prescribed a mediation for pain relief on an as needed basis. Interviews revealed that the pain medication caused R1 to experience drowsiness as a side effect and staff stopped giving R1 that pain medication as a result. Interviews did not reveal any concerns regarding R1’s pain management or overmedication. Interviews with staff and outside parties denied any instances of R1 or any other residents being overmedicated by facility staff. The Department has investigated the above-mentioned allegation and based on interviews and records review, the preponderance of the evidence has not been met, therefore, this allegation is deemed unsubstantiated. An exit interview was conducted with Caregiver Leonor Gaya, whose signature below confirms receipt of a copy of this report and the Licensee Appeal Rights (LIC9058 03/22).the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 29, 2024 · control 08-AS-20240110105212

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87468.1(a)(11) · Plan of correction due date: Mar 8, 2024

87468.1 (a)(11) To have their visitors, including ombudspersons and advocacy representatives, permitted to visit privately during reasonable hours and without prior notice... This requirement has not been met as evidenced by: Based on interviews and records review, the Licensee did comply with the section above due to staff restricting OP1 from visiting with R1. This poses a potential personal rights risk to 6 of 6 residents.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 29, 2024

Plan of correction: The House Manager stated that staff will allow visitation for all residents and staff will receive in-service training and submit copies of the sign in sheet to the Department by POC due date of 3/8/24.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedthere was not enough evidence to prove a violation occurred — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe evidence showed the allegation was false, could not have happened, or had no reasonable basisType A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗

An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents and the questions below stand in their place.

Who holds the licence

Jcmy Care Homes LLC, licensed since 2020, operates 3 licensed homes in California. Running more than one home is common and is neither good nor bad on its own.

Life here

Rooms, meals, the rhythm of a day, faith and language, pets and house rules — as the home describes them. Tap any detail for its source and date; nothing here is graded.

Find a detail about life at this home.

Rooms & the spaces they will use

  • Room typesPrivate · Semi-Private

    Reported on aplaceformom.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Outdoor spaceOutdoor Common Areas

    Reported on aplaceformom.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Roll-in / accessible shower

    Reported on aplaceformom.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Common areasIndoor Common Areas

    Reported on aplaceformom.com · seen September 9, 2026.

Meals, preferences & familiar food

Activities & the rhythm of a day

  • Activity types offeredActivities On-site

    Reported on aplaceformom.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Trips outside the home

    Reported on aplaceformom.com · seen September 9, 2026.

Faith, culture & language

  • Languages spoken by caregiversFilipino · English

    Reported on aplaceformom.com · seen September 9, 2026.

Pets, routines & independence

  • Pet types allowedDogs · Cats

    Reported on aplaceformom.com · seen September 9, 2026.

Visiting & staying involved

  • Public transit access claimed

    Reported on aplaceformom.com · seen September 9, 2026.

Before you call

Ask every home the same questions — the state’s record does not answer these. Keep the ones that matter and they travel with your saved homes.

  1. What is included in the monthly rate, and what costs extra?
  2. Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?
  3. Which rooms does the non-ambulatory approval cover, and what transfer support is provided?
  4. What could change whether someone can stay here?
  5. Can we see a bedroom and share a meal during a visit?

Other homes nearby

The nearest licensed homes in San Diego County, closest first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.

Explore San Diego County