Small home · Licensed for 6 · Hesperia
Chantilly Lace Manor II
8430 "I" Avenue, Hesperia, CA 92345Licensed since 2015
Overview
No openings reported
- Approved by the state: Wheelchair · Dementia · Hospice · BedriddenState licensing record · October 26, 2026
- Licensed for 6: a small care homeThe state license record
Ask this home
Free for families. A home gets your number only if you say yes.
Care and support
- Wheelchairup to 6 residents
- Dementia
- Hospiceup to 6 residents
- Bedriddenup to 1 resident
Approved by the state · State licensing record · October 26, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.
Read the state’s own wording
6 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH ONE MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 6.
983 - RCFE / DEMENTIA
CDSS record, verbatim · October 26, 2026
As needs change
Staying through hospice
Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 6 — care may continue at the end of life
State licensing record · October 26, 2026
If memory loss develops
Dementia-care designation on file
State licensing record · October 26, 2026
We’ll ask for you. Not on file for Chantilly Lace Manor II: two-person transfers or a lift, who is awake overnight and help with medicines. When we check availability, we ask about these too.
Check availabilityWhat it costs here
Covelight estimate
$4,100a month to start
Likely $3,350–$5,050
From 13 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file
Monthly cost breakdownWith a shared room and basic help · room, care and fees$4,100likely a month
Starting monthly rate$4,100likely $3,350–$5,050
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 13 small homes and similar homes within 8 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600
Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (44 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).
One-time move-in fee$2,500one time · likely $0–$4,000
Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,500 (133 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.
- Likely monthly totalLikely $3,350–$5,250
- $4,100
- First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $3,950–$8,500
- $6,600
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
- MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
- Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
- Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated October 1, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
- SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
- VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
- Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
Rates at nearby homes13 nearby homes publish starting rates of $2,800 to $5,500
13 homes like this within 8 miles publish starting rates mostly between $3,100–$4,600.
- Cherry & Pine Garden Home CareHesperia · 1.1 mi · Small home$3,500Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Aries Residential CareHesperia · 4.2 mi · Small home$3,400Listed on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026
- Carmel Care HomeHesperia · 4.6 mi · Mid-size home$3,000Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Mission of Love IIHesperia · 4.7 mi · Mid-size home$3,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Aging Grace Senior Living FacilityHesperia · 4.8 mi · Small home$3,800Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Golden Years Elderly CareVictorville · 5.5 mi · Small home$2,800Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Della Guest HomeVictorville · 5.6 mi · Small home$4,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Seegal Residential CareVictorville · 5.6 mi · Small home$4,000Listed on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026
- Yorkshire Garden Care #1Apple Valley · 5.9 mi · Small home$3,200Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Oak Hills Home CareOak Hills · 6.4 mi · Small home$5,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Maemar ManorVictorville · 6.8 mi · Small home$4,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
- Arya Garden Assisted LivingVictorville · 7.0 mi · Small home$4,900Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Crystal Garden RCFEApple Valley · 7.3 mi · Mid-size home$5,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 13 small homes and similar homes within 8 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
- Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
- Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
- Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
- Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
- We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
- It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
- The care level
Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.
- What is billed separately
Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.
- Move-in costs
A one-time move-in fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.
- Increases
California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.
An estimate for planning, not a quote. A home sets the price after hearing about the care needed.
Daily life
Daily life here is not on file yet. Most small homes haven’t published it, and that says nothing about the home.
The best way to see it is a visit.
Request a tourWhere it is
8430 "I" Avenue, Hesperia, CA 92345Address from the public record · October 26, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.
Opening the neighborhood map…
- Desert Valley HospitalHospital · General acute care, on the state’s list4.7 mi
Straight-line distances; check the drive or the walk. Hospital: the nearest general acute care hospital on the state’s list (CDPH, September 16, 2026).
Open directionsThe state record
California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.
CDSS public record, read October 26, 2026 · License #366426709 · See the state’s own record
The last 36 months — 7 of 9 documents
Complaint outcomes in these 36 months, in the state’s words: 2 “Unsubstantiated”.
20261 state visit · 1 document
Feb 27, 2026Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Magda Malcore and Eldin Serrano made an unannounced visit to the facility. The purpose of the visit was to conduct a required comprehensive annual inspection. LPAs were granted entry to the facility and met with Licensee Teresa Baddeley. At the time of the visit there was one (1) staff, The Licensee, and three (3) residents present. Physical Plant: Indoor and outdoor passageways are free of obstructions. The facility is maintained at a comfortable temperature of 70 degrees Fahrenheit. LPAs inspected resident bedrooms; they are equipped with the required furniture such as: mattresses, nightstands, storage space, and sufficient lighting; bathrooms were clean, and appliances were operating appropriately. LPAs observed sufficient furniture and lighting throughout the facility. LPAs measured and observed the water temperatures in the bathroom to be at 105 degrees Fahrenheit. The facility is equipped with operating smoke detectors and carbon monoxide alarms. Fire extinguisher was also observed at the facility. Posters such as Community Care Licensing complaint poster, Ombudsman poster, labor law, facility license, and facility sketch were posted in a common area. Cleaning supplies, sharps, and other dangerous items were kept inaccessible to residents in care. There was a designated storage space for resident/staff files. There is a medication room with the resident’s medications locked. LPAs observed first aid kit and manual. Yards/Outside: One shaded patio, one self-latching gate and an attached two (2) car garage was observed. Food Service: Seven (7) days’ supply of Non-perishable foods and two (2) days’ supply of perishable food supply were observed and sufficient for the number of residents in care. LPAs observed that the facility does not have enough emergency food and water for 72 hour emergency. Citation issued. Record Review: LPAs reviewed three (3) resident files for admission agreements, updated physician reports, pre-placement appraisals and needs and services plans. LPAs observed resident files were complete. LPAs reviewed three (3) residents medications. LPAs found that R1 and R2 medication records were not accurately maintained by staff. Deficiency issued. LPAs reviewed three (3) staff files for First Aid/CPR certifications, criminal record clearances, trainings, and health screenings. LPAs observed staff#1 (S1) and staff#3 (S3) did not have a health screening with tuberculosis results on file. Staff#2 (S2) did not have a health screening on file. S3 did not have First Aid/CPR certification on file. Deficiency issued. Based on the observations made during today’s visit, deficiencies were cited per Title 22, Division 6, of the California Code of Regulations and per Health and Safety Codes (HSC) An exit interview was conducted, and this report LIC809, LIC809C, LIC809D forms, and Appeal Rights were discussed and provided to Licensee.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 27, 2026
20254 state visits · 4 documents
Oct 15, 2025Facility evaluation reportCase Management - DeficienciesDeficiency page: Type B
Type of visit: Case Management - Deficiencies
Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Magda Malcore and Eldin Serrano conducted an unannounced visit to the facility. LPAs met with staff, Heilala Poloa, explained the purpose of the visit and was granted entry into the facility. During today's visit, LPAs requested from staff Poloa, resident registry, resident files which contain resident admission's agreement and physician's reports pertaining to complaint investigation 56-AS-20251008092142. Staff stated that that they did not have access to resident files that contain that information. A deficiency is being cited in accordance with Title 22 of the California Code of regulations. An exit interview was conducted where this report was discussed and a copy provided with appeal rights to Staff Poloa at the conclusion of the visit.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 15, 2025
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87506(d) · Plan of correction due date: Oct 29, 2025
87506 Resident Records (d) All resident records shall be available to the licensing agency to inspect, audit, and copy upon demand during normal business hours...this requirement is not met as evidence by: The Licensee did not comply with the section cited above by LPAs not having access to residents files which contain admissions agreement and physician's reports and resident registry during visit. Staff stated they did not have access to the files; which is a potential health, safety and personal rights risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 15, 2025
Plan of correction: The Licensee/Administrator shall read and submit a statement of understanding of regulation cited to the licensing agency by POC due date.
Aug 25, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Facility staff restrain a resident in care
Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Magda Malcore and Eldin Serrano conducted a unannounced complaint visit to the facility. LPAs were granted entry, met with Administrator, Teresa Baddeley, and informed the purpose of the visit. The investigation consisted of document review, observations, and interviews with pertinent parties. Regarding the allegation, facility staff restrain a resident in care, LPAs observed resident #1 (R1) wearing a gait lap belt at the facility. Review of R1's file record reveals the facility has a current physician's order for the use of gait belt. Based on the department's investigation, the allegation above is Unsubstantiated; meaning that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur. An exit interview was conducted where this report was discussed and a copy provided with appeal rights to Administrator Baddeley at the conclusion of the visit. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 25, 2025 · control 56-AS-20250822143428
Mar 19, 2025Facility evaluation reportPOCReport on file
Type of visit: POC
Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Magda Malcore and Eldin Serrano conducted an unannounced Plan of Correction (POC) visit to the facility. LPAs met with Heilala Paola, Caregiver,were granted entry and explained the purpose of the visit. Licensee Teresa Baddeley arrived to the facility shortly after and explained the purpose of the visit. On 02/12/25 deficiencies were cited during a facility inspection and correction plans were due on 03/10/25. As of today’s visit, the following deficiencies have not been cleared: · a statement of understanding of regulation cited [87465(d)(3)] was not provided to the LPAs. Licensee Baddeley stated that once her appeal is denied she will provide the statement of understanding. · a copy of resident #1 (R1) signed admission’s agreement was not provided to the LPAs during today's visit. The Licensee stated she will have the family signed the documentation and submit a picture of the signed document the LPA. · LPAs observed that facility supplies and equipment were still stored in resident’s designated private bathroom closet. · LPAs observed that surveillance cameras were still mounted in all residents’ bedrooms. Civil penalties of $3600 were accessed today for failure to correct deficiencies due on 3/10/2025 and civil penalties will continue to accrue $100 per day per violation until proof of correction has been received. An exit interview was conducted with the licensee. Copies of reports LIC809 & LIC421FC were provided with appeal rights to Licensee Baddeley at the conclusion of the visit.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 19, 2025
Feb 12, 2025Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) made an unannounced visit to the facility to conduct a required comprehensive annual inspection. LPA met with Licensee, Teresa Baddeley and caregiver, Carmen Enriquez. The facility is a Residential Care Facility for Elderly (RCFE) with a license capacity of (6), and a current census of (6). LPA conducted a general inspection of facility, which included, but was not limited to, the following: Physical Plant: Indoor and outdoor passageways were kept free of obstruction. The facility has no swimming pools or similar bodies of water. The facility has sufficient indoor and outdoor space for resident activities. The facility is maintained at a comfortable temperature of 72 degrees F. Resident (5) bedrooms were furnished with beds, bedlinen, night stands, chairs, and lighting. LPA observed cameras mounted on the wall of each resident's bedroom. Resident (3) bathrooms were maintained clean and sanitary. The hot water temperatures in the bathrooms measured at 106 degrees F. LPA observed resident's private bathroom had a closet which was utilized to store facility's personal hygiene/incontinence products for all residents in care. The facility is equipped with smoke detectors/carbon monoxide alarms, laundry equipment, cover fireplaces and telephone service. Posters such as personal rights, the Community Care Licensing complaint poster, Ombudsman poster, facility license and the disaster plan were posted. Cleaning supplies and sharps were kept inaccessible to residents in care. Food Service: Kitchen and dining areas were maintained cleaned. Non-perishable and perishable food supply is sufficient for number of residents in care. Medications/Health related services: Medications were centrally stored in a locked cabinet. LPA asked staff #4 (S4) to assist with providing resident medication administration logs. S4 stated that the facility does not maintain record/log of when medication is administered to residents. LPA asked staff for current medication list/record, S4 stated they were not familiar with how the facility manages the medication list since they are fill-in staff for that shift. **continued on LIC809-C** Record Review: LPA reviewed (3) resident files for admission agreements, updated physician reports, appraisals, and needs and services plans. LPA observed missing authorized persons signatures on several pages of Resident #1 (R1's) admissions agreement. LPA reviewed (3) staff files for employment history, first Aid/CPR certifications, criminal record clearances, training, and health screenings. LPA observed staff#1 (S1), staff#2 (S2), and staff#3 (S3) did not have a complete health/physical screening for review. Deficiencies are being cited per Title 22, Division 6, of the California Code of Regulations. An exit interview was conducted where reports (LIC809/LIC809-C/LIC809-D/ LIC9102) were discussed. Copies provided with appeal rights to Caregiver Enriquez at the conclusion of the visit.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 12, 2025
20241 state visit · 2 documents
Jan 24, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Facility staff did not seek timely medical attention for a resident.
Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Anna Bueno and Michelle Echeverria conducted an unannounced visit to this facility for the purpose of initiating the investigation of and delivering findings for the above allegation. LPAs met with licensee Teresa Baddeley who was advised of the purpose of visit. The investigation consisted of records review and interviews with relevant parties. It is alleged that Resident 1 (R1) was not provided timely medical attention by facility staff. LPA Bueno conducted interviews that revealed that R1's change of condition was observed by Witness 1 (W1) who reported the change to their agency and to facility staff. Interviews further revealed R1 was not seen by any medical personnel from the outside agency providing R1 with services. Records reviewed also revealed that R1 was receiving services from an outside agency when their condition was observed by W1 and that R1 was taken to the local hospital for treatment on the same day R1's condition was observed. This allegation is therefore unsubstantiated. A finding of UNSUBSTANTIATED means although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is no preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur. An exit interview was conducted with Licensee and a copy of this report was provided. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 24, 2024 · control 56-AS-20240117121300
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87265(d)(3) · Plan of correction due date: Feb 2, 2024
(d) If the resident is unable to determine his/her own need for a prescription or nonprescription PRN medication, and is unable to communicate his/her symptoms clearly, facility staff designated by the licensee, shall be permitted to assist the resident with self-administration provided all of the following requirements are met: (3) The date and time the PRN medication was taken, the dosage taken, and the resident's response shall be documented and maintained in the resident's facility record. This requirement was not met as evidenced by: LPAs inspected resident medications and centralized record and found three medications not listed on the centralized record. Two of three medications appeared to have been administered, which poses a potential health and safety risk to clients in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 24, 2024
Plan of correction: Licensee shall conduct an audit of all resident medications and complete a completed list of all resident medications. Licensee shall submit proof of correction to the Department no later than end of POC date.
Jan 24, 2024Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
On 1/24/24, Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Michelle Echeverria and Anna Bueno arrived unannounced to conduct the required annual visit to the facility. LPAs met with Licensee, Teresa Baddeley and introduced self and stated purpose of the visit. LPAs were informed that there are currently 6 residents in care. The facility has 5 bedrooms, 3 bathrooms, 2 kitchens, dining area, living room, family room, sitting room, office, laundry/medication room, attached garage and backyard. LPAs completed a walk through of facility, review of records and medication audit. Physical Plant: The facility is operating in the capacity approved by Community Care Licensing (CCL). There are no obstructions to indoor and outdoor passageways. The facility is maintained at a comfortable temperature of 74 degrees fahrenheit. LPAs inspected resident bedrooms; they are equipped with required furniture such as: mattresses, night stands, storage space, chairs and sufficient lighting. LPAs inspected resident bathrooms; bathrooms were clean and appliances were found functional. Water temperatures tested at 109 degrees fahrenheit. The facility is equipped with operational smoke detectors, carbon monoxide alarms, charged fire extinguisher and first aid kit. Posters such as; the personal rights, emergency disaster plan, CCL complaint poster and ombudsman were posted in a common area. Cleaning supplies, toxins, sharps, and other dangerous items were kept locked and inaccessible to residents. There was a designated storage space for resident/staff files. Medications were observed locked and inaccessible to residents. There is no swimming pool, firearms or ammunition in the facility. Overall, the facility is clean, in good repair, and operating in safe conditions for residents in care. Food Service: Non-perishable and perishable food supply is sufficient for residents in care. Dishes, cups, and utensils were also stored properly. Yards/Outside: One shaded patio, side gate with self-latching handle on the left and right side of the house that leads into the backyard. Record Review: LPAs reviewed staff and administrator files for First Aid/CPR certification, criminal record clearance, trainings, and health screenings. LPAs reviewed resident files for admission agreements, updated physician reports, and needs and services plans. LPAs reviewed medication and observed altered labels, expired medication and medication not logged. Deficiencies issued. LPAs observed the Emergency Disaster Plan and Infection Control Plan incomplete. Deficiencies issued. Deficiencies were cited during this visit. An exit interview was conducted where this report LIC809, LIC809C, LIC809D and appeal rights were discussed and copies were provided to Licensee, Teresa Baddeley.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 24, 2024
Earlier years2022 to 2023 · 2 documents
20231 state visit · 1 document
May 8, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Uncleared staff are working at the facility. Facility staff are not receiving adequate training.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Rayshaun Nickolas visited the facility unannounced to deliver the finding on the above allegations. LPA met with caregivers Shirley Becks and Christina Espinoza and explained the purpose of the visit. Becks’ called the Licensee Teresa Baddeley, and Baddeley arrived at the facility approximately 30 minutes later. The investigation included a facility tour, file reviews, and interviews with relevant parties. Allegation #1: “Uncleared staff are working at the facility”. The allegation alleged that multiple employees at the facility do not have a background check. LPA Nickolas’ interview with the Licensee revealed that all employees have a criminal records clearance. LPA Nickolas’ file review revealed that all employees have a criminal record clearance with our agency. The finding is Unsubstantiated. There is no evidence or witnesses to corroborate the allegation. Allegation #2: “Facility staff are not receiving adequate training”. The allegation alleged that only one (1) day of training is provided at the facility. Unsubstantiated LPA Nickolas' interview with the Licensee revealed that new employees are provided the recommended training outlined by the Title 22 California Code of Regulations (CCR). LPA Nickolas randomly audited four (4) out of six (6) employees' training records, which revealed that employees are provided 40 hours of training within 30 days of hire. LPA Nickolas' file audit also revealed that the facility provides all employees with 20 hours of annual training. The finding is Unsubstantiated. There is no evidence or witnesses to corroborate the allegation. The finding is Unsubstantiated. There is no evidence or witnesses to corroborate the allegation. A finding of Unsubstantiated means although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur. An exit interview was conducted and copy of this report was provided. Based on the evidence gathered during the investigation, the above allegation is substantiated. A finding that the complaint is substantiated means that the allegation(s) is valid because the preponderance of the evidence standard has been met. An exit interview was conducted where a copy of this report (LIC 9099), LIC 9099D, and appeal rights were discussed and provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 8, 2023 · control 56-AS-20230503095510
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87411(c)(1)&(f) · Plan of correction due date: May 15, 2023
87411 Personnel Requirements - General (c)(1)&(f) Staff providing care shall receive appropriate training in first aid from persons qualified by such agencies as the American Red Cross. (f) all personnel, including the licensee and administrator , shall be in good health... This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on file review, the Licensee did not ensure that all employees file has proof of first aide training and TB test, which poses a potential health, safety, personal rights violations to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 8, 2023
Plan of correction: Licensee shall submit proof of all employees first aide trainings and health screening to the regional office by the POC due date.
20221 state visit · 1 document
Feb 14, 2022Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Stephanie Williams conducted an unannounced visit to the facility in order to conduct a required annual inspection, with an emphasis on infection control, due to the COVID-19 pandemic. LPA Williams identified herself to Licensee/Administrator, Teresa Baddeley, who was also informed of the purpose of the visit. During the inspection, LPA Williams interviewed Baddeley regarding the facility's infection control measures and inspected the facility for regulatory compliance. LPA Williams observed appropriate postings in the facility, including COVID-19 symptoms postings and emergency contact information, which were in accordance with the Department's guidelines. LPA Williams observed that the facility was also equipped with sufficient hand hygiene supplies, sufficient cleaning/disinfecting provisions, and a supply of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE). The facility has a designated infection control lead person who has been tasked with tracking all COVID-19 cases and/or suspected cases and that staff are trained in the facility's infection control measures. The facility has a plan in place which follows Community Care Licensing Division guidelines for COVID-19 testing, isolation, and properly caring for clients with COVID-19 positive results and/or exposures. The facility also has a plan in place to monitor residents regularly for any changes in condition and to subsequently notify the resident's physician and emergency personnel in the event the resident presents any COVID-19 symptoms. Furthermore, LPA Williams observed that the facility appeared to be meeting operational requirements. LPA Williams observed that all utilities and appliances were functioning properly and all passageways clear of obstruction, including emergency exits. The facility was equipped with sufficient food supply and emergency supplies. All areas of the facility, including resident bedrooms and restrooms, appeared clean and in good repair. LPA Williams observed that medications and dangerous objects were kept inaccessible to residents in care. LPA Williams observed no apparent health and safety risks at the time of visit. Based on interviews and observations made during today’s inspection, no deficiencies were cited per Title 22, Division 6, of the California Code of Regulations. An exit interview was conducted where this report was discussed and a copy of this report was provided to Baddeley at the conclusion of the inspection.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 14, 2022
6 of 6 beds were occupied at the August 25, 2025 state visit — a count on that day, not an opening.
License holder
Chantilly Lace Manor LLC, licensed since 2015.
Operates 2 licensed homes in California. Running more than one home is common and is neither good nor bad on its own.
- Chantilly Lace Manor · Hesperia
The state’s totals for this licenseSince 2015, as the state’s facility page counts them
- State visits on file
- 11
- Total complaints
- 3
- Substantiated allegations
- 2
- Type A citations
- 0
- Type B citations
- 2
These are the state’s own totals for this license since 2015, per CDSS records. The state counts them apart from the documents above, and they can differ from what those documents show; the documents say what each visit found. One complaint can contain several allegations.
Compare with homes the same size
| This home | Typical | |
|---|---|---|
| Type A citations | 0 | 0 |
| Type B citations | 2 | 0 |
| Substantiated allegations | 2 | 0 |
| Total complaints | 3 | 0 |
“Typical” is the statewide median for licensed homes this size. It does not adjust for years licensed, and older licenses have had more visits and reports. The median is across the 6,916 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record. The figures compared are the state’s totals, not the documents.
What the state’s words mean
CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents stand in their place.
Frequently asked questions
A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.
Quick answers about Chantilly Lace Manor II
Is Chantilly Lace Manor II licensed?
The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
How many residents is Chantilly Lace Manor II licensed for?
6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Has Chantilly Lace Manor II been cited?
0 Type A and 2 Type B citations since 2015, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. Those records count 11 state visits over the same years.
Is Chantilly Lace Manor II still open?
This license was on the CDSS roster as of November 11, 2026.
What does Chantilly Lace Manor II cost?
$4,100 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $3,350–$5,050. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 13 small homes and similar homes within 8 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
Among 5 other homes of a similar licensed size in Hesperia that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $3,300 to $3,575 a month, and the middle figure is $3,500 (n = 5 other homes publishing a starting rate).
Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.
A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.
The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.
A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.
Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
Does Chantilly Lace Manor II take Medi-Cal?
On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated October 1, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
Who holds the license?
The license is held by Chantilly Lace Manor LLC, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. See the homes licensed to Chantilly Lace Manor LLC — at least 2 on the state roster.
Is there a hospital nearby?
Desert Valley Hospital is 4.7 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.
Can Chantilly Lace Manor II keep a resident on hospice?
Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 6 residents, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Chantilly Lace Manor II license and inspection record
- Name on the license: “CHANTILLY LACE MANOR II”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
- License #366426709. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- Licensed for 6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- Licensed to Chantilly Lace Manor LLC, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- First licensed in 2015, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- 11 state inspection visits since 2015, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- 0 Type A and 2 Type B citations on file since 2015, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. The same records count 11 state visits in that period.
- 3 complaints and 2 substantiated allegations on file since 2015, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
- The most recent state visit on file is October 14, 2026, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗
Nearby
Other homes nearby
Licensed homes near this one in San Bernardino County, most information on file first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$3,000 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $2,350–$3,850On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Starting rate
$3,500 a month to start
Listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$3,950 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $3,100–$5,200On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$4,150 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $3,400–$5,100On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$4,150 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $3,400–$5,100On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$4,050 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $3,300–$5,000On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
Street maps © Protomaps · © OpenStreetMap
Explore San Bernardino County