Illustration — no photo of this home on file yet
Chantilly Lace Manor
Small home·Licensed for 6·Hesperia, California
- Care approvals on fileWheelchair · Dementia · Hospice · BedriddenState licensing record · September 27, 2026
- Estimated starting rate$4,050 a monthCovelight estimate · likely $3,300–$5,000
- Home sizeLicensed for 6Small care home · a licensed care home (RCFE)
- Room at the last state visit6 of 6 beds occupiedAugust 21, 2025 · not a current opening
- Ways to payAsk the homeMedi-Cal ALW participation not on file
- Last state visitFebruary 27, 2026CDSS inspection record
- Licence holderChantilly Lace Manor LLCSince 2012 · 2 licensed homes
Chantilly Lace Manor is a small care home in Hesperia — a licensed residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE), the licence category behind “assisted living” and “board and care.” It is licensed for 6 residents since 2012.
Built from CDSS public records · September 27, 2026. Every fact below names its source and date.
Quick answers and the state record
A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.
Quick answers about Chantilly Lace Manor
Is Chantilly Lace Manor licensed?
The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
How many residents is Chantilly Lace Manor licensed for?
6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
Has Chantilly Lace Manor been cited?
0 Type A and 1 Type B citation since 2012, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. Those records count 13 state visits over the same years.
Is Chantilly Lace Manor still open?
This license was on the CDSS roster as of September 28, 2026.
What does Chantilly Lace Manor cost?
$4,050 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $3,300–$5,000. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 13 small homes and similar homes within 9 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
Among 5 other homes of a similar licensed size in Hesperia that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $3,300 to $3,575 a month, and the middle figure is $3,500 (n = 5 other homes publishing a starting rate).
Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.
A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.
The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.
A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.
Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
Does Chantilly Lace Manor take Medi-Cal?
On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
Who holds the license?
The license is held by Chantilly Lace Manor LLC, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. See the homes licensed to Chantilly Lace Manor LLC — at least 2 on the state roster.
Can Chantilly Lace Manor keep a resident on hospice?
Hospice care is approved on this license, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
Chantilly Lace Manor license and inspection record
- Name on the license: “CHANTILLY LACE MANOR”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
- License #366425325. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
- Licensed for 6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
- Licensed to Chantilly Lace Manor LLC, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
- First licensed in 2012, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
- 13 state inspection visits since 2012, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
- 0 Type A and 1 Type B citation on file since 2012, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. The same records count 13 state visits in that period.
- 5 complaints and 1 substantiated allegation on file since 2012, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
- The most recent state visit on file is February 27, 2026, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗
Can they support the care needed?
California licenses a home for specific kinds of care. The state’s record lists what this home is approved for; the home’s own answers fill in what changes as needs change.
- Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved · covers up to 6 residents
- Dementia / memory careApproved by the state
- Hospice careApproved by the state
- BedriddenApproved · covers up to 2 residents
State licensing record · September 27, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.
Read the state’s own wording
6 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 2 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN IN ROOM #2. HOSPICE WAIVER 6.
983 - RCFE / DEMENTIA
CDSS record, verbatim · September 27, 2026
As needs change
- Staying through hospice
Hospice waiver on file — care may continue at the end of life
Ask: “If hospice is needed, can care continue here until the end?”
State licensing record · September 27, 2026
- If memory loss develops
Dementia-care designation on file
Ask: “Can we read the dementia care disclosure and discuss how daily support works?”
State licensing record · September 27, 2026
3 more questions to ask the home
- Two-person transfers or a lift
Not on file
Ask: “If two people or a lift are needed to transfer, can the person stay?”
- Someone awake overnight
Not on file
Ask: “Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?”
- Medicines
Not on file
Ask: “Who manages the medicines, and what happens when a dose is missed?”
What it costs here
Covelight estimate
$4,050a month to start
Likely $3,300–$5,000
From 13 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file
Likely monthly total
$4,050a month
Likely $3,300–$5,200
With a shared room and basic help.
An estimate for planning, not a quote. The price is made in the phone call.
See the full cost breakdownRoom, care and fees · how people pay · how this estimate works
Starting monthly rate$4,050likely $3,300–$5,000
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 13 small homes and similar homes within 9 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600
Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (45 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).
One-time move-in fee$2,000one time · likely $0–$4,000
Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,000 (134 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.
- Likely monthly totalLikely $3,300–$5,200
- $4,050
- First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $3,900–$8,350
- $6,050
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
- Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
- Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
- SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
- VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
- Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
- MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
- The care level
Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.
- What is billed separately
Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.
- Move-in costs
A one-time community fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.
- Increases
California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.
- What is the full monthly cost for the room and care we need, and what does it include?
- What would the next care level cost, and who decides when it changes?
- What is billed separately, and is there a one-time fee or deposit at move-in?
- Is any private-pay period required before another payment program can begin?
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 13 small homes and similar homes within 9 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
13 homes like this within 9 miles publish starting rates mostly between $3,150–$4,650.
- Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
- Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
- Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
- Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
- We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
- It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Show the 13 nearby homes behind this estimate
- Cherry & Pine Garden Home CareHesperia · 0.4 mi · Small home$3,500Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Aries Residential CareHesperia · 5.3 mi · Small home$3,400Listed on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026
- Carmel Care HomeHesperia · 6.0 mi · Mid-size home$3,000Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Mission of Love IIHesperia · 6.2 mi · Mid-size home$3,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Aging Grace Senior Living FacilityHesperia · 6.3 mi · Small home$3,800Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Yorkshire Garden Care #1Apple Valley · 6.8 mi · Small home$3,200Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Golden Years Elderly CareVictorville · 7.0 mi · Small home$2,800Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Della Guest HomeVictorville · 7.0 mi · Small home$4,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Seegal Residential CareVictorville · 7.1 mi · Small home$4,000Listed on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026
- Oak Hills Home CareOak Hills · 7.1 mi · Small home$5,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Crystal Garden RCFEApple Valley · 8.1 mi · Mid-size home$5,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Maemar ManorVictorville · 8.3 mi · Small home$4,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
- Arya Garden Assisted LivingVictorville · 8.4 mi · Small home$4,900Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
Where it is
- 7421 Minstead Ave, Hesperia, CA 92345Address from the public record · September 27, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.
Opening the neighborhood map…
The state record
California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. Here are the dated documents and the state’s own words, beside what is typical for homes this size.
Since 2021, the state has filed 12 documents for this home, and its records count 13 visits since 2012. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated February 27, 2026.
- On file since
- 2021
- State visits
- 13
- Most recent visit
- February 27, 2026
- Occupied · August 21, 2025 visit
- 6 of 6 bedsa count on that day, not an opening
We hold 6 complaint reports the state published for this home, dated July 29, 2021 to August 21, 2025. 6 of the 6 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Unfounded” (2), “Unsubstantiated” (4). 6 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word. Summary composed by computer from the 6 complaint reports below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.
Beside homes the same size
- Type A citations0typical 0
- Type B citations1typical 0
- Substantiated allegations1typical 0
- Total complaints5typical 0
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 6,808 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this licence since 2012.
Year by year
The last 36 months — 7 of 12 documents
Feb 27, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Magda Malcore and Eldin Serrano made an unannounced visit to the facility. The purpose of the visit was to conduct a required comprehensive annual inspection. LPAs met with Caregiver, Donna Norton and were granted entry to the facility. At the time of the visit there was one (1) staff, and five (5) residents present. Physical Plant: Indoor and outdoor passageways are free of obstructions. The facility is maintained at a comfortable temperature of 72 degrees Fahrenheit. LPAs inspected resident bedrooms; they are equipped with the required furniture such as: mattresses, nightstands, storage space, and sufficient lighting; bathrooms were clean, and appliances were operating appropriately. LPAs observed sufficient furniture and lighting throughout the facility. LPAs measured and observed the water temperatures in the bathroom to be at 112 degrees Fahrenheit. The facility is equipped with operating smoke detectors and carbon monoxide alarms. Fire extinguisher was also observed at the facility. Posters such as Ombudsman poster, labor law, facility license, and facility sketch were posted in a common area. Cleaning supplies, sharps, and other dangerous items were kept inaccessible to residents in care. There was a designated storage space for resident/staff files. There is a medication room with the resident’s medications locked. LPAs observed first aid kit and manual. Yards/Outside: One shaded patio, one self-latching gate and an attached two (2) car garage was observed. Food Service: Seven (7) days’ supply of Non-perishable foods and two (2) days’ supply of perishable food supply were observed and sufficient for the number of residents in care. LPAs observed that the facility does not have enough emergency food and water for 72 hour emergency. Citation issued. Record Review: LPAs reviewed three (3) resident files for admission agreements, updated physician reports, pre-placement appraisals and needs and services plans. LPAs observed resident files reviewed were complete. LPAs reviewed three (3) staff files for First Aid/CPR certifications, criminal record clearances, trainings, and health screenings. Based on the observations made during today’s visit, a deficiency was cited per Title 22, Division 6, of the California Code of Regulations and Health and Safety Code (HSC). An exit interview was conducted, and this report LIC809, LIC809C, LIC809D forms, and Appeal Rights were discussed and provided to Caregiver Norton.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 27, 2026
The state marks this report as 5 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 4. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.
Aug 21, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff forced a resident to take medication Staff administered another resident's prescribed medication to a resident Staff restrained a resident
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Magda Malcore conducted an unannounced visit to the facility to conclude and deliver the findings on the above allegations. LPA was granted entry into the facility and met with Administrator, Teresa Baddeley. The investigation consisted of record review and interviews with pertinent parties. Regarding the allegation, staff forced a resident to take medication, interview with Resident #1 (R1) reveals that staff did not force them to take medication. Interviews with the Administrator and two (2) staff deny forcing any residents to take medications. Regarding the allegation, staff administered another resident's prescribed medication to a resident, review of resident’s medication records reveals medications were given as prescribed. Interviews with the Administrator and two (2) staff deny administering another resident’s prescribed medication to another resident. Unsubstantiated Regarding the allegation, staff restrained a resident, it was alleged that staff physically restrained R1. Interview with (R1) reveals they were not restrained by staff. Interviews with the Administrator and two (2) staff deny restraining any residents. Based on this department’s investigation, the allegations mentioned in this report are Unsubstantiated. An Unsubstantiated finding means although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur. An exit interview was conducted where this report was discussed, and a copy was provided with appeal rights to Administrator Baddeley at the conclusion of the visit.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 21, 2025 · control 56-AS-20241107120742
Aug 21, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Facility staff restrained a resident
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Magda Malcore and Licensing Program Manager, Karen Clemons conducted an unannounced complaint visit to the facility. The investigation consisted of observations, file review and interviews with pertinant parties. Regarding the allegation, facility staff restrained a resident, LPA observed resident #1 (R1) and resident #2 (R2) wearing lap belt retraints at the facility. Review of resident files reveals the resident #1 (R1), resident #2 (R2), and resident #3(R3) have physician's order to use gait belts. Based on the department's investigation, the allegation above is Unsubstantiated; meaning that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur. An exit interview was conducted where this report was discussed and a copy provided with appeal rights to Administrator Baddeley at the conclusion of the visit. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 21, 2025 · control 56-AS-20250818103259
Feb 7, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Michelle Echeverria arrived unannounced to conduct the required annual visit to the facility. LPA met with Caregiver, Donna Norton and introduced self and stated purpose of the visit. LPA was informed that there are currently 6 residents in care who are in the facility. LPA telephone called the Licensee, Teresa Baddeley and informed her about the purpose of the visit. The facility has 3 resident bedrooms, 1 staff bedroom, 2 bathrooms, kitchen, dining area, living room, family room, laundry room, attached garage, and backyard. LPA completed a walk through of facility, and review of records. Physical Plant: The facility is operating in the capacity approved by Community Care Licensing (CCL). There are no obstructions to indoor and outdoor passageways. The facility is maintained at a comfortable temperature of 71 degrees fahrenheit. LPA inspected resident bedrooms; they are equipped with required furniture such as: mattresses, night stands, storage space, chairs and sufficient lighting. LPA observed a resident occupying a staff bedroom without fire clearance approval. Deficiency issued. LPA inspected resident bathrooms; bathrooms were clean and appliances were found functional. Water temperatures tested at 120 degrees fahrenheit. The facility is equipped with operational smoke detectors, carbon monoxide alarms, fire extinguisher and first aid kit. Posters such as; the ombudsman, administrator certificate and license were posted in a common area. LPA also observed cleaning supplies, toxins, sharps, and other dangerous items locked in cabinets made inaccessible to residents. There was a designated storage space for resident/staff files. Medications were observed secured and inaccessible to residents. There are no bodies of water, guns or ammunition in the facility. Food Service: Non-perishable and perishable food supply is sufficient for number of residents in care. Facility has a wide variety of food available for residents. Dishes, cups, and utensils were also stored properly. Yards/Outside: One shaded patio, a side gate with self-latching handle on the right side of the house that leads into the backyard, and a attached garage used for storage. All outdoor pathways were free of obstructions. Record Review: LPA reviewed 3 resident files for admission agreements, updated physician reports, and needs and services plans. LPA also reviewed personnel and administrator files for First Aid/CPR certification, criminal record clearance, trainings, and health screenings. LPA observed no health screening and TB for 1 caregiver. Deficiency issued. LPA observed a second caregiver arrive and assist residents without background clearance. LPA interviewed caregiver and stated that they had already worked 3 days prior. Deficiency with civil penalty issued. LPA reviewed the facility's insurance coverage, emergency disaster plan, infection control plan and emergency drills. LPA observed that the Infection Control Plan was not reviewed/updated annually. Technical violation issued. LPA observed that the Emergency Disaster Plan was not reviewed/updated annually. Technical violation issued. Deficiencies, two technical violations and one civil penalty were cited during this visit. An exit interview was conducted where this report LIC809, LIC809C, LIC809D, LIC9102TV, LIC421BG and appeal rights were discussed and copies were provided to Caregiver, Donna Norton.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 7, 2025
The state marks this report as 6 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 4. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.
Jan 23, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Facility staff did not dispense medications as prescribed. Facility staff withheld food from resident. Facility staff withheld water from resident. Facility staff is giving the residents alcohol. Facility staff is using a physical restraint on resident.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Ryan Gardner made an unannounced visit to investigate and deliver findings for the allegations listed above. LPA stated the purpose of the visit, was granted entry, and met with Administrator Teresa Baddeley. The investigation consisted of resident interviews, staff interviews, and document review. For allegation, Facility staff did not dispense medications as prescribed: Interviews with the staff revealed that the facility is dispensing the resident’s medication as prescribed. Prior to dispensing, the staff reads the resident’s prescription containers to ensure they are dispensing as ordered. The staff stated the process is to remove the medication out of the prescription containers, place the medications into a reusable cup container, and then immediately hand the cup container to the residents, and the staff verifies the resident took the medication. Once the resident takes the medication, the staff logs and initials the medication in the resident's MAR record. Unsubstantiated Interviews with the residents revealed that there were no known issues with medication not being dispensed as prescribed. Document review of the residents MARs records revealed that the resident’s medication is being documented appropriately. For allegation, Facility staff withheld food from resident: Interviews with the staff and the residents revealed that the residents are not being withheld food. The residents are served breakfast, lunch, dinner, and snacks throughout the day. The meals served include a mixture of fruits, vegetables, protein, and carbohydrates. If the residents are not full after a meal, additional food is available and offered until the resident is full. Document review of the facilities menu revealed that the facility offers a mixture of fruits, vegetables, protein, and carbohydrates three (3) times a day. The staff and the residents both denied that the residents are withheld food. For allegation, Facility staff withheld water from resident: Interviews with the staff and the residents revealed that the residents are not being withheld water. The residents are offered water throughout the day. The staff and the residents both denied that the residents are withheld water. For allegation, Facility staff is giving the residents alcohol: Interviews with the staff and the residents revealed that the residents on occasion are provided alcohol. The alcohol is only provided at resident’s request due to the resident having personal rights. During these occasions, it is usually during a holiday and or a celebration. The residents are only provided a small amount of alcohol. The staff only allows alcohol if the resident is not on a medication that will interact with the alcohol. For allegation, Facility staff is using a physical restraint on resident: Interviews with the staff and the residents revealed that the resident’s are not being physically restrained. The facility staff utilizes a gait belt to assist the residents with their transfers and mobility. The staff and the residents both denied that the residents are being physically restrained. Overall, there was not enough evidence to collaborate the allegations listed above. Based on evidence obtained during the investigation, the allegations listed above are deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED. A finding that the complaints are UNSUBSTANTIATED means although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur. During today’s visit, no deficiencies were cited per Title 22, Division 6, of the California Code of Regulations. An exit interview was conducted, and this report (LIC9099) was discussed and provided Administrator Teresa Baddeley, along with a copy of the appeal rights.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 23, 2024 · control 56-AS-20240117142158
Jan 23, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Deficiencies
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Ryan Gardner conducted an unannounced case management visit to the facility during a complaint visit for control number 56-AS-20240117142158. During the visit, LPA observed cameras in the resident’s bedrooms and camera monitoring in the laundry room which poses a potential health, safety, or personal rights risk to persons in care. During today’s visit, one (1) deficiency was cited per Title 22, Division 6, of the California Code of Regulations. An exit interview was conducted where this report (LIC809), LIC809D, the appeal rights were discussed and provided to Teresa Baddeley.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 23, 2024
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87209(a)(2) · Plan of correction due date: Jan 26, 2024
87209 Program Flexibility (a) The use of alternate concepts, programs, services, procedures, techniques, equipment, space, personnel qualifications or staffing ratios, or the conduct of experimental or demonstration projects shall not be prohibited by these regulations provided that: (2) A written request for a waiver or exception and substantiating evidence supporting the request shall be submitted in advance to the licensing agency by the applicant or licensee. This requirement is not met as evidenced based on observation and interview, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above evidenced by having cameras in the resident’s bedrooms without a written approval from the department which poses a potential health, safety, or personal rights risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 23, 2024
Plan of correction: The licensee has agreed to read regulation 87209 entirely and send LPA a statement of understanding that the regulation was read and understood. The licensee has agreed to remove the cameras from the resident’s bedrooms. The licensee has agreed to send a written request to have cameras in the resident's bedrooms and have approval from the department prior to installing the cameras in the resident’s bedrooms. The POC is due on 1/26/2024.
Dec 21, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Mary Rico made an unannounced visit to the facility. The purpose of the visit was to conduct a required comprehensive annual inspection. LPA met with care giver Alison D. Bowler and was granted entry to the facility. The facility is a (6) bedroom (2) bathroom home and, with a kitchen/dining area, living room, and attached garage. LPA was accompanied by Administrator Teresa Baddeley to conduct a general overall inspection, which included, but was not limited to, the following: Physical Plant: The facility is operating in the capacity approved by Community Care Licensing (CCL). There are no obstructions to indoor and outdoor passageways. The facility is maintained at a comfortable temperature. LPA inspected client bedrooms; they are equipped with required furniture such as: mattresses, night stands, storage space, and sufficient lighting; bathrooms were clean, and appliances were operating appropriately. LPA observed sufficient furniture and lighting throughout the facility. The facility is equipped with operating smoke detectors and carbon monoxide alarms. Posters such as personal rights, the CCL complaint poster, and the disaster plan were posted in a common area. Cleaning supplies, toxins, and sharps were kept inaccessible to clients in care. There was a designated space for client/staff files. Food Service: Non-perishable and perishable food supply is sufficient for number of clients in care. Facility has a variety of food available for clients. Dishes, cups, and utensils were also stored properly. Care & Supervision: Facility has sufficient care staff for coverage 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. Record Review: LPA reviewed (4) resident files for admission agreements, updated physician reports, and needs and services plans. LPA reviewed (4) resident medications. During medication review, LPA observed lose medications and medications transferred between containers. LPA also reviewed (2) staff files for First Aid/CPR certification, criminal record clearance, training's, and health screenings. During record review, LPA observed S1 did not have a criminal record clearance. Administrator stated S1 did not have a criminal record clearance. S1 immediately left the facility. Based on the observations made during today’s visit, two (2) Type A deficiencies were cited per Title 22, Division 6, of the California Code of Regulations. And a Civil Penalty in the amount of $500 dollars will be issued for S1 for working without a criminal record clearance. An exit interview was conducted, and this report (LIC809) (LIC809D) (LIC421BG) was discussed and provided Administrator Teresa Baddeley. Along with a copy of the Appeals Rights.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 21, 2023
What the state’s words mean
CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗
Who holds the licence
Chantilly Lace Manor LLC, licensed since 2012, operates 2 licensed homes in California. Running more than one home is common and is neither good nor bad on its own.
- Chantilly Lace Manor II · Hesperia
Life here
Rooms, meals, the rhythm of a day, faith and language, pets and house rules — as the home describes them. Tap any detail for its source and date; nothing here is graded.
The home has not described daily life anywhere we have reviewed yet — that is the case for most small homes, and it says nothing about the home. These questions fill in the picture; keep the ones that matter to you.
Before you call
Ask every home the same questions — the state’s record does not answer these. Keep the ones that matter and they travel with your saved homes.
- What is included in the monthly rate, and what costs extra?
- Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?
- Which rooms does the non-ambulatory approval cover, and what transfer support is provided?
- What could change whether someone can stay here?
- Can we see a bedroom and share a meal during a visit?
Other homes nearby
The nearest licensed homes in San Bernardino County, closest first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.
Cherry & Pine Garden Home Care
Hesperia · Small home · 0.4 mi away
$3,500 a month to start · Listed by the home
Senior Serenity in the High Desert
Hesperia · Small home · 0.9 mi away
$4,600 a month to start · Covelight estimate
Chantilly Lace Manor II
Hesperia · Small home · 1.5 mi away
$4,100 a month to start · Covelight estimate
Aloha Senior Living
Hesperia · Small home · 1.9 mi away
$4,150 a month to start · Covelight estimate
Hesperia Senior Care
Hesperia · Mid-size home · 1.9 mi away
$3,950 a month to start · Covelight estimate
Canyon View Juniper Care Home
Hesperia · Small home · 2.3 mi away
$4,600 a month to start · Covelight estimate