Braswell's Chateau Villa is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Redlands, San Bernardino County, California — state license #360902129, licensed for 156 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It appears on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026, so Medi-Cal may help pay for care services here. California has 66 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2021, the most recent dated May 14, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

9 homes in view

Braswell's Chateau Villa

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Large community, 156 residents · Redlands, CA · San Bernardino County
LicensedWheelchairHospiceMemory care not on fileBedridden not on file
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #360902129, held since 1977 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
620 E. Highland Avenue · Redlands, San Bernardino County
Phone
(909) 793-0433
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 72 residents
Dementia / memory careNot on file — ask the home
Hospice careApproved for 20 residents
Bedridden careNot on file — ask the home

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
84 AMBULATORY, 72 NON-AMBULATORY IN 1ST FLOOR & ROOM #220. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR TWENTY (20).State service designation985 - RCFE / HOSPICEthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

Since 2021, the state has visited this home 79 times and filed 66 documents. The most recent is a complaint investigation report, dated May 14, 2026.

Most recent state visit
May 14, 2026
Occupancy at the August 9, 2024 visit
120 of 156 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 25 documents with transcribed findings, dated January 21, 2021 to August 9, 2024. 25 of the 25 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (6), “Unfounded” (7), “Unsubstantiated” (12). 25 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 25 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 47 of 66 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20268 state visits · 13 documents
May 14, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 14, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 27, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 6, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 24, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 24, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 24, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 21, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Feb 10, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Feb 10, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Feb 10, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Feb 1, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 21, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

202514 state visits · 18 documents
Dec 11, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Dec 3, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Nov 21, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Nov 21, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Oct 31, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Oct 13, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Aug 26, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Aug 26, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jul 14, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jul 14, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jun 19, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 22, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 4, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 3, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Feb 26, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Feb 13, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 14, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 14, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20248 state visits · 10 documents
Nov 27, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Nov 27, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Nov 5, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Oct 23, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Sep 20, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Sep 20, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Aug 9, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff hit resident

Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Magda Malcore and Becky Mann conducted an unannounced visit to the facility to conclude the complaint investigation on the above allegation. LPAs met with Administrator, Melanie Niez, who was informed of today’s visit. Regarding the allegation, staff hit resident, interviews with facility staff, resident #1(R1), and an outside party corroborate the allegation. Staff #1 admitted tapping R1 on the head during a disagreement. R1’s interview reveals they were hit on the head by S1. LPA record review and the Administrators’ interview reveals, S1 received a write-up and suspension for inappropriate conduct towards R1. Based on interviews and record review, the allegation is Substantiated. A Substantiated finding means that the allegation is valid because the preponderance of the evidence standard has been met. An exit interview was conducted where reports (LIC9099&LIC9099-D) were discussed and provided with appeal rights to the administrator at the conclusiothe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 9, 2024 · control 56-AS-20240506155415
May 16, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 21, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Staff did not provide filtered water to drink to a resident per Admission Agreement

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Magda Malcore conducted an unannounced complaint visit to the facility. LPA met with Melanie Niez, Administrator, and discussed the purpose of the visit. Regarding the allegation, staff did not provided filtered water to drink to a resident per Admission Agreement. LPA review of resident #1 (R1's) admission's agreement reveals no documentation of an agreement to provide filtered water. Based on interviews and record review, the above allegation is Unfounded. An Unfounded finding means, the allegation is false, could not have happened, and/or is without a reasonable basis. An exit interview was conducted where this report was discussed and a copy of this report was provided to the Administrator at the conclusion of the visit. Unfoundedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 21, 2024 · control 56-AS-20240314112044
Mar 8, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff does not ensure facility is free of pests and rodents.

****This report has been Amended for electronic signatures**** Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Magda Malcore conducted an unannounced complaint visit to the facility. LPA met with Administrator, Melanie Niez and discussed the purpose of the visit. The investigation consisted of observations, reviewing pertinent documents, and interviews with relevant parties. Regarding the allegation, Staff does not ensure facility is free of pests and rodents, it is alleged that the facility has a roach and mice infestation and the facility is not making efforts to treat the problem. LPA toured the kitchen and (5) resident bedrooms. Regarding the roach infestation, LPA did not observe a roach infestation and there is not enough evidence to corroborate this allegation. In regards to the rodents, LPA observed in bedroom 11A, two (2) rodent traps. LPA observed one of the traps had a dead rodent, in the trap closest to the sliding glass door. LPA observed in bedroom 33, several rodent traps which includedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 8, 2024 · control 56-AS-20240304085608
20236 state visits · 6 documents
Nov 29, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Resident is not accorded dignity in relationships with staff. Staff did not assist resident with medications as needed.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Kathleen Banrasavong made an unannounced visit to the facility to commence a complaint investigation regarding the allegations listed above. LPA met with Administrator, Melanie Niez, and explained the purpose of the visit and the elements of the allegations. LPA Banrasavong conducted the investigation which consisted of observation, interviews, and record review. LPA attempted on numerous occasions to contact the Reporting Party (RP) The contact number provided was not valid. LPA attempted to do a search through multiple channels and found no contact information within Community Care Licensing’s database. LPA was unable to obtain any additional information at this time. On 09/18/2020, Community Care Licensing received a complaint stating that staff did not assist resident with medications as needed and Resident is not accorded dignity in relationships with staff. In regards to the allegation of Staff did not assist resident with medications as needed. Tthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 29, 2023 · control 18-AS-20200918151847
Nov 16, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Nov 6, 2023Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not clean residents room

On 11/6/2023, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Janette Romero arrived unannounced to the facility to conclude an investigation into the allegation listed above. LPA met with Administrator, Melanie Niez and explained the purpose of the visit. During the course of the investigation, LPA reviewed resident and staff interviews and conducted a facility file review. On 8/28/2020, Community Care Licensing, received a complaint investigation stating that "Staff did not clean residents room". It was reported that facility staff did not clean Resident 1’s (R1’s) room for over a week and a half in 2020. The four (4) staff interviewed corroborated that R1’s room had not been properly cleaned, due to the facility facing a housekeeping staffing shortage. Continued on LIC9099-C. Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 6, 2023 · control 18-AS-20200828161015
Sep 22, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Sep 14, 2023Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff violated resident's personal rights

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Magda Malcore conducted an unannounced complaint visit to the facility. LPA met with Melanie Niez, Administrator and discussed the purpose of the visit. Regarding the allegation, staff violated resident's personal rights, Administrator Niez stated that Resident #1 (R1) was exhibiting aggressive behaviors toward theirself and others as a result law enforcement was contacted and R1 was placed on a 51/50 hold on 9/3/2023. Administrator Niez was informed by hospital staff that R1 was ready to be discharged to the facility. Administrator informed hospital staff that R1 is not permitted to return to the facility due to R1 being a danger to theirself and others. Based on pertinent record review and interviews with relevant parties, the allegation is Substantiated. A finding that the complaint is Substantiated means that the allegation(s) is valid because the preponderance of the evidence standard has been met. An exit interview was conducted where reports (LIC9the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 14, 2023 · control 56-AS-20230912135704
Sep 7, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff hit resident

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Magda Malcore conducted an unannounced complaint visit to the facility. LPA met with Melanie Niez, Administrator and discussed the purpose of the visit. The investigation consisted of LPA observations, pertinent document review, and interviews with relevant parties. Regarding the allegation, staff hit resident, Administrator and staff interviews reveal that they have not witnessed Staff #1 (S1) hit a resident nor have they hit a resident. S1 denies hitting a resident. Resident #1, #2, and #4 interviews deny that S1 and other staff hit them. Resident #3, #5, and #6 interviews deny knowing S1 and deny staff hit them. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 7, 2023 · control 56-AS-20230717160803
Beside homes the same size
Type A citations6typical 1
Type B citations7typical 1
Substantiated complaints13typical 2
Total complaints55typical 7
State visits on file79typical 19
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,244 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 1977.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated202681302025141802024810220231415320224402021391
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$3,500$5,500 /mo
our estimate — San Bernardino County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home is on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →Medi-Cal waiver fact wrong? Report it — free →

Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
Ask how the 2024 complaint investigation report was corrected — what changed?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (909) 793-0433

Is Braswell's Chateau Villa licensed?

Yes — Braswell's Chateau Villa is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Redlands (San Bernardino County): California license #360902129, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 156 residents. State records list 66 inspection and complaint documents since 2021; the most recent, a complaint investigation report dated May 14, 2026, appears in the inspection record on this page.

Can Braswell's Chateau Villa care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Braswell's Chateau Villa with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory and hospice care; it does not list dementia / memory care and bedridden. A clearance that is not on file is not a “no” — it may simply be unrecorded, so if your family needs one of these, ask the home directly and confirm its current scope on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license record84 AMBULATORY, 72 NON-AMBULATORY IN 1ST FLOOR & ROOM #220. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR TWENTY (20).

How much does Braswell's Chateau Villa cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Braswell's Chateau Villa's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in San Bernardino County typically runs $3,500–$5,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $3,000–$5,000/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Braswell's Chateau Villa accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Yes — Medi-Cal can help pay for care at Braswell's Chateau Villa through California's Assisted Living Waiver (ALW): the home appears on the Department of Health Care Services participant list checked August 9, 2026. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services — not room and board — for eligible Medi-Cal members, and each home takes a limited number of waiver residents, so ask the home about a current ALW opening.

Medi-Cal / ALW homes in San Bernardino County →Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

120 of 156 beds occupied (77%) when the state visited on August 9, 2024. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Braswell's Chateau Villa?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 79 state visits and 66 dated documents since 2021 for Braswell's Chateau Villa; 25 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated August 9, 2024, records an allegation the state marked “Substantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

25 transcribed reports on file

2024

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff hit resident
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Magda Malcore and Becky Mann conducted an unannounced visit to the facility to conclude the complaint investigation on the above allegation. LPAs met with Administrator, Melanie Niez, who was informed of today’s visit. Regarding the allegation, staff hit resident, interviews with facility staff, resident #1(R1), and an outside party corroborate the allegation. Staff #1 admitted tapping R1 on the head during a disagreement. R1’s interview reveals they were hit on the head by S1. LPA record review and the Administrators’ interview reveals, S1 received a write-up and suspension for inappropriate conduct towards R1. Based on interviews and record review, the allegation is Substantiated. A Substantiated finding means that the allegation is valid because the preponderance of the evidence standard has been met. An exit interview was conducted where reports (LIC9099&LIC9099-D) were discussed and provided with appeal rights to the administrator at the conclusioCDSS inspection report, August 9, 2024 · control 56-AS-20240506155415
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not provide filtered water to drink to a resident per Admission Agreement
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Magda Malcore conducted an unannounced complaint visit to the facility. LPA met with Melanie Niez, Administrator, and discussed the purpose of the visit. Regarding the allegation, staff did not provided filtered water to drink to a resident per Admission Agreement. LPA review of resident #1 (R1's) admission's agreement reveals no documentation of an agreement to provide filtered water. Based on interviews and record review, the above allegation is Unfounded. An Unfounded finding means, the allegation is false, could not have happened, and/or is without a reasonable basis. An exit interview was conducted where this report was discussed and a copy of this report was provided to the Administrator at the conclusion of the visit. UnfoundedCDSS inspection report, March 21, 2024 · control 56-AS-20240314112044
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff does not ensure facility is free of pests and rodents.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
****This report has been Amended for electronic signatures**** Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Magda Malcore conducted an unannounced complaint visit to the facility. LPA met with Administrator, Melanie Niez and discussed the purpose of the visit. The investigation consisted of observations, reviewing pertinent documents, and interviews with relevant parties. Regarding the allegation, Staff does not ensure facility is free of pests and rodents, it is alleged that the facility has a roach and mice infestation and the facility is not making efforts to treat the problem. LPA toured the kitchen and (5) resident bedrooms. Regarding the roach infestation, LPA did not observe a roach infestation and there is not enough evidence to corroborate this allegation. In regards to the rodents, LPA observed in bedroom 11A, two (2) rodent traps. LPA observed one of the traps had a dead rodent, in the trap closest to the sliding glass door. LPA observed in bedroom 33, several rodent traps which includedCDSS inspection report, March 8, 2024 · control 56-AS-20240304085608

2023

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResident is not accorded dignity in relationships with staff. Staff did not assist resident with medications as needed.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Kathleen Banrasavong made an unannounced visit to the facility to commence a complaint investigation regarding the allegations listed above. LPA met with Administrator, Melanie Niez, and explained the purpose of the visit and the elements of the allegations. LPA Banrasavong conducted the investigation which consisted of observation, interviews, and record review. LPA attempted on numerous occasions to contact the Reporting Party (RP) The contact number provided was not valid. LPA attempted to do a search through multiple channels and found no contact information within Community Care Licensing’s database. LPA was unable to obtain any additional information at this time. On 09/18/2020, Community Care Licensing received a complaint stating that staff did not assist resident with medications as needed and Resident is not accorded dignity in relationships with staff. In regards to the allegation of Staff did not assist resident with medications as needed. TCDSS inspection report, November 29, 2023 · control 18-AS-20200918151847
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not clean residents room
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
On 11/6/2023, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Janette Romero arrived unannounced to the facility to conclude an investigation into the allegation listed above. LPA met with Administrator, Melanie Niez and explained the purpose of the visit. During the course of the investigation, LPA reviewed resident and staff interviews and conducted a facility file review. On 8/28/2020, Community Care Licensing, received a complaint investigation stating that "Staff did not clean residents room". It was reported that facility staff did not clean Resident 1’s (R1’s) room for over a week and a half in 2020. The four (4) staff interviewed corroborated that R1’s room had not been properly cleaned, due to the facility facing a housekeeping staffing shortage. Continued on LIC9099-C. SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, November 6, 2023 · control 18-AS-20200828161015
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff violated resident's personal rights
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Magda Malcore conducted an unannounced complaint visit to the facility. LPA met with Melanie Niez, Administrator and discussed the purpose of the visit. Regarding the allegation, staff violated resident's personal rights, Administrator Niez stated that Resident #1 (R1) was exhibiting aggressive behaviors toward theirself and others as a result law enforcement was contacted and R1 was placed on a 51/50 hold on 9/3/2023. Administrator Niez was informed by hospital staff that R1 was ready to be discharged to the facility. Administrator informed hospital staff that R1 is not permitted to return to the facility due to R1 being a danger to theirself and others. Based on pertinent record review and interviews with relevant parties, the allegation is Substantiated. A finding that the complaint is Substantiated means that the allegation(s) is valid because the preponderance of the evidence standard has been met. An exit interview was conducted where reports (LIC9CDSS inspection report, September 14, 2023 · control 56-AS-20230912135704
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff hit resident
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Magda Malcore conducted an unannounced complaint visit to the facility. LPA met with Melanie Niez, Administrator and discussed the purpose of the visit. The investigation consisted of LPA observations, pertinent document review, and interviews with relevant parties. Regarding the allegation, staff hit resident, Administrator and staff interviews reveal that they have not witnessed Staff #1 (S1) hit a resident nor have they hit a resident. S1 denies hitting a resident. Resident #1, #2, and #4 interviews deny that S1 and other staff hit them. Resident #3, #5, and #6 interviews deny knowing S1 and deny staff hit them. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, September 7, 2023 · control 56-AS-20230717160803
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility staff did not keep the home free from odor.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Ryan Gardner made an unannounced visit to the facility to conclude and issue findings for the investigation that was initiated on 11/18/2022. LPA stated the purpose of the visit and was granted entry and met with Administrator Melanie Niez. The investigation consisted of interviews with facility staff, interviews with residents, and a review of facility records. For allegation, Facility staff did not keep the home free from odor: It was alleged that the facility smells like urine and bowel movement. During interviews with residents, the residents stated that the facility does smell like urine and bowel movement. The residents smell urine and bowel movement in the main areas and hallways of the facility, as well as smelling the odor in their bedrooms on the flooring and carpet. SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, July 18, 2023 · control 56-AS-20221116170954
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedFacility staff failed to pick up resident after a medical appointment
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Tricia Danielson and Janette Romero arrived unannounced to the facility to conclude an investigation into the allegation listed above. LPA met with Adminstrator Melanie Niez and explained the purpose of the visit. Regarding the allegation "Facility staff failed to pick up resident after a medical appointment", it was alleged that the facility did not ensure Resident #1(R1) was provided transportation back to the facility from an appointment at a hospital on the afternoon of November 3, 2020. Interviews with facility staff revealed R1 was not picked up by their insurance transportation service as planned following their appointment and after being contacted by the hospital late that night, a facility staff member picked R1 up and returned them to the facility at 11:30 PM. This agency has investigated the complaint alleging "Facility staff failed to pick up resident after a medical appointment". We have found that the complaint was unfounded, meaning thaCDSS inspection report, May 12, 2023 · control 18-AS-20201103101606
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResident's personal belongings were not safeguarded
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 4/26/23, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Magda Malcore conducted an unannounced 10-day complaint investigation at the facility. LPA Malcore met with Administrator Melanie Neiz an discussed the purpose of the visit. The investigation consisted of file review and interviews with relevant parties. Regarding the allegation that resident’s personal belongings were not safeguarded, staff interviewed deny not safeguarding or stealing resident’s personal belongings. Four (4) out of five (5) residents interviewed stated that their personal belongings are safeguarded and have not stolen. Based on the investigation conducted, there is not enough evidence to corroborate this allegation; Therefore, the allegation is Unsubstantiated. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation(s) did or did not occur. No deficiencies were cited at this time. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, April 26, 2023 · control 56-AS-20230420120739
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility staff is locking the residents out of the faciltiy while in the designated smoking area
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Tricia Daneilsona and Janette Romero arrived to the facility to conclude an investigation into the allegation into the allegation above. LPAs met with Administrator Melanie Niez and explained the purpose of the visit. During today's visit, LPAs interviewed eleven (11) residents, two (2) staff, and toured the facility. Regarding the allegation "Facility staff is locking the residents out of the faciltiy while in the designated smoking area", it was alleged that facility staff keep the door to the outside smoking area locked preventing residents who are outside smoking from being able to get back into the building. Interviews were conducted with eveln (11) residents. Seven (7) of eleven (11) residents interviewed reported they smoke. Seven (7) of eleven (11) residents interviewed reported the door to the smoking area locks on occasion as they exit but they are able to get back into the building either by going around to the front door, by holding it openCDSS inspection report, April 19, 2023 · control 18-AS-20201014104738
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff does not provide meal service to resident in care.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Magda Malcore and Bernadette Allen conducted an unannounced visit to initate a complaint investigation and deliver findings for the allegation above. LPA's met with Melanie Niez who was informed of the purpose of the visit. Allegation #1 - Staff does not provide adequate meal service to resident in care During the investigation LPA's observed that there was a current menu available for review and the alternate menu. LPA Allen observed sufficient food supplies to meet the needs of those in care. There was a 5-day supply of perishables and 7-day supply of non-perishables. LPA's also interviewed five (5) residents and four (4) staff members who stated meals are being served by staff in a timely manner in the dining area but if they are not feeling well they are encouraged at least three times so they can associate and get exercise. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, February 21, 2023 · control 56-AS-20230214160051
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility staff did not serve food in a timely manner. Facility staff is not meeting the resident's dietary needs. Staff are not giving residents privacy.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analysts (LPA) Bernadette Allen made an unannounced visit to the facility for the purpose of delivering findings on a complaint conducted on 8/7/2020, by Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Naisha Kendrix. LPA Kendrix contacted the facility via phone due to the COVID virus. LPA introduced herself and discussed the reason for the call and requested to conduct the call via Zoom. Documentation states that resident 1 (R1) said the facility staff was provided with their doctor’s orders for special dietary needs. (R1) said that food is provided at another time if they are not ready to eat at the time food is scheduled to be served which is based on (R1's) request. Resident 1 (R1) said that there is a lock on the door and staff members are not always allowed to come into the room while they are in the room. LPA Naisha Kendrix conducted interviews with four (4) staff members who said (R1) has a history of locking the door and not allowing anyone entry into the room unless it is gCDSS inspection report, February 17, 2023 · control 18-AS-20200807123801

2022

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff not providing resident with meals in a timely manner. Resident’s shower is dirty.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Bernadette Allen conducted an unannounced visit to initiate a complaint investigation for the allegations above. LPA Allen met with Melanie Niez who was informed of the purpose of the visit. Allegation #1-Staff not providing resident with meals in a timely manner. During the investigation LPA Allen observed that there was a current menu avaliable for review.LPA observed sufficient food supplies to met the needs of those in care. LPA also interviewed (4) four residents and (5) five staff members who stated meals are being served meals by staff in a timley manner. Continued..... UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, September 14, 2022 · control 56-AS-20220906134157
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedFacility staff failed to meet resident's needs Facility staff failed to treat resident with respect
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Javier Prieto arrived to the facility to conclude a complaint investigation regarding allegations that the facility staff failed to meet resident's needs and facility staff failed to treat resident with respect. LPA Prieto met with administrator James Braswell (S1) who was interviewed, as well as staff #2 (S2), staff #3 (S3). LPA also interviewed resident #1 (R1). Staff stated that there has not been any disrespect to R1 and there has not been any complaints related to R1's care. R1 stated that all care needs are being met as well as being very pleased with the staff's care and interactions. R1 stated that there are no concerns to be reported to this State representative. This agency has investigated the complaint alleging that the facility staff failed to meet resident's needs and facility staff failed to treat resident with respect. We have found that the complaint was UNFOUNDED, meaning that the allegations were false, could not have happened and/or iCDSS inspection report, February 3, 2022 · control 18-AS-20220126135848
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility retained resident(s) beyond their level of care. Facility has rodents. Facility staff neglected to seek medical attention for resident.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Stephanie Williams made an unannounced visit to the facility in order to deliver findings for the above allegations. LPA Williams identified herself to the Administrator, James Braswell, who was also informed of the purpose of the visit. The investigation consisted of records review and interviews with staff and residents. In regards to allegation #1, LPA Williams interviewed Staff #1 (S1), Staff #2 (S2), and Staff #3 (S3) who all denied that the facility is retaining residents beyond their level of care. S1 stated that if a resident experiences a change in condition, the resident's primary physician is notified and service plan is adjusted accordingly. S1 and S3 stated that facility staff were able to provide appropriate care for both Resident #1 (R1) and Resident #2 (R2) prior to passing. In regards to allegation #2, S1 stated that the facility had an issue with rodents in the facility in December of 2020; however, the facility has had no issues with rCDSS inspection report, January 10, 2022 · control 18-AS-20201201154558

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 79 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for larger communities (16+ beds), computed across all 1,244 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
6
typical for this size: 1
Type B citations
7
typical for this size: 1
Substantiated complaints
13
typical for this size: 2
Total complaints
55
typical for this size: 7
State visits on file
79
typical for this size: 19
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(909) 793-0433
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Braswell's Chateau Villa? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.