Small home · Licensed for 6 · Redlands
Rose Valley Redlands
153 S Dearborn St, Redlands, CA 92374Licensed since 2017
Overview
No openings reported
- Approved by the state: HospiceState licensing record · October 26, 2026
- Licensed for 6: a small care homeThe state license record
Ask this home
Free for families. A home gets your number only if you say yes.
Care and support
- Hospiceup to 6 residents
Not on file: wheelchair, dementia and bedridden approvals.
Approved by the state · State licensing record · October 26, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.
Read the state’s own wording
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER, APPROVED HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 6.
935 - ELDERLY
CDSS record, verbatim · October 26, 2026
As needs change
Staying through hospice
Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 6 — care may continue at the end of life
State licensing record · October 26, 2026
We’ll ask for you. Not on file for Rose Valley Redlands: two-person transfers or a lift, who is awake overnight, help with medicines and care if memory loss develops. When we check availability, we ask about these too.
Check availabilityWhat it costs here
Covelight estimate
$4,400a month to start
Likely $3,600–$5,400
From 10 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file
Monthly cost breakdownWith a shared room and basic help · room, care and fees$4,400likely a month
Memory care is not priced here: a dementia-care designation is not on file for this home. Ask the home.
Starting monthly rate$4,400likely $3,600–$5,400
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 10 small homes and similar homes within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600
Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (44 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).
One-time move-in fee$2,500one time · likely $0–$4,000
Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,500 (133 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.
- Likely monthly totalLikely $3,600–$5,600
- $4,400
- First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $4,250–$8,800
- $6,900
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
- MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
- Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
- Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated October 1, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
- SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
- VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
- Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
Rates at nearby homes10 nearby homes publish starting rates of $3,000 to $6,500
10 homes like this within 5 miles publish starting rates mostly between $3,500–$6,000.
- Casa BienRedlands · 0.7 mi · Small home$4,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Pacific PinesRedlands · 0.8 mi · Mid-size home$5,800Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Aspen Grove Home CareRedlands · 1.1 mi · Small home$4,300Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Ancheta's PlaceMentone · 1.6 mi · Small home$4,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Adora CareRedlands · 2.0 mi · Small home$6,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
- Canyon View Pacific HomeRedlands · 2.2 mi · Mid-size home$6,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Blessed Garden HomeRedlands · 2.7 mi · Small home$3,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Assisted Living of AmericaYucaipa · 4.4 mi · Small home$3,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Yucaipa Valley Board & CareYucaipa · 4.5 mi · Small home$6,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Golden Home Care CenterYucaipa · 4.9 mi · Small home$3,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 10 small homes and similar homes within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
- Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
- Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
- Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
- Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
- We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
- It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
- The care level
Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.
- What is billed separately
Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.
- Move-in costs
A one-time move-in fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.
- Increases
California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.
An estimate for planning, not a quote. A home sets the price after hearing about the care needed.
Daily life
Daily life here is not on file yet. Most small homes haven’t published it, and that says nothing about the home.
The best way to see it is a visit.
Request a tourWhere it is
153 S Dearborn St, Redlands, CA 92374Address from the public record · October 26, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.
Opening the neighborhood map…
- Redlands Community HospitalHospital · General acute care, on the state’s list3.5 mi
Straight-line distances; check the drive or the walk. Hospital: the nearest general acute care hospital on the state’s list (CDPH, September 16, 2026).
Open directionsThe state record
California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.
CDSS public record, read October 26, 2026 · License #361800187 · See the state’s own record
The last 36 months — 11 of 16 documents
Complaint outcomes in these 36 months, in the state’s words: 7 “Unsubstantiated”.
20262 state visits · 2 documents
Oct 8, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file
We haven’t transcribed this report yet. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Apr 14, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff transferred resident to another facility without consent.
On 04/14/2026, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Beena Singh arrived at the facility, greeted by House Manager Mistie Felton and was granted entry to the facility. Facility Vice President-Iren Creighton was informed and arrived during the visit, LPA Singh introduced herself to the Facility Vice President-Iren Creighton and stated the purpose of this visit. Second Allegation:- Second Allegation:-Staff transferred resident to another facility without consent. Licensing Program Analyst(LPA) Singh interviewed Staff, outside agency, reviewed records. Records review and interviews with Staff and outside agency confirmed that Licensee/Staff informed resident's family about the resident's transfer to the other facility due to R#1s change of condition and needed higher level of care. Unsubstantiated Staff transferred resident to another facility without consent is determined to be Unsubstantiated, as facility Staff/administrator did inform resident's family and transferred resident#1 with consent of the family to another facility. Based on the evidence found during the investigation, the allegations listed above are deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED. A finding that the complaints are UNSUBSTANTIATED means although the allegation may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur. During today’s visit, no deficiencies were cited per Title 22, Division 6, of the California Code of Regulations. An exit interview was conducted where this report LIC9099, 9099C was discussed and provided to Facility Representative, Facility Vice President Iren Creighton.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 14, 2026 · control 56-AS-20241004092109
The state marks this report as 4 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 2. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.
20252 state visits · 2 documents
Dec 11, 2025Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Magda Malcore made an unannounced visit to the facility to conduct a required annual inspection. LPA was granted entry, met with Mistie Felton, House Manager, and discussed the purpose of the visit. The facility is a Residential Care Facility for the Elderly (RCFE) with a license capacity of (6) and a current census of (6) residents in care. LPA conducted an overall inspection of the facility, which included, but was not limited to, the following: Physical Plant/Environment: The facility is operating in the capacity approved by Community Care Licensing Division (CCLD). Indoor and outdoor passageways are free of obstruction. The facility has no swimming pools or similar bodies of water. Outdoor shaded area is sufficient for resident activities and is enclosed with self-latching gates. The facility is equipped with carbon monoxide/smoke alarms, two (2) fully charged fire extinguishers, covered fireplace, laundry equipment, emergency food/water, hallway lighting, sufficient personal hygiene products, and telephone service.The facility is maintained at a temperature of 74 degrees Fahrenheit (F). Resident bathrooms were operating in a safe and sanitary conditions. The hot water temperature in residents' bathrooms measured 116 degrees F. Resident’s bedrooms were equipped mattresses, bed linen, night stands, chairs, storage space and lighting. The facility has posted in a common area: Community Care Licensing complaint poster, Ombudsman poster, facility license, resident councils rights, disaster evacuation plan and emergency telephone numbers. Sharps, disinfectants, and cleaning solutions were kept locked and inaccessible to residents in care. Food Service: Facility kitchen and dining areas are maintained clean. The facility has sufficient non-perishable and perishable food supply for residents in care. The facility has a sample menu posted in the kitchen area. Care & Supervision: Facility has 24-hour, 7 days a week care staff. Staff working have criminal record clearances and first Aid/CPR certifications. Medications: Facility maintains records of resident's medications and medications were kept locked. Record Review: Three (3) staff files reviewed were observed to be complete. Four (4) resident files reviewed were observed to be complete. The facility maintains records of the Administrator’s certification, liability insurance, client registry, staff emergency drill training, infection control plan, emergency and disaster plan. Annual inspection is complete with no deficiencies cited. An exit interview was conducted where this report was discussed and a copy provided to House Manager Felton at the conclusion of the visit.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 11, 2025
The state marks this report as 4 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 3. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.
Jul 14, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff yells at residents in care. Staff denies resident water. Staff do not ensure resident is provided with toileting assistance.
On 7/14/2025 at 3:20 PM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Eldin Serrano made an unannounced visit to the facility to deliver the findings of the above allegations. LPA Serrano met with House Manager Mistie Felton to explain the purpose of the visit. The investigation consisted of file review, interviews with facility staff and residents as well as facility observation. Allegation #1: Staff yells at residents in care. – Based on information received during interviews LPA was unable to corroborate the allegation. 4 out 5 residents, 1 resident refused to be interviewed and 3 out of 4 staff stated that they have not witnessed/observed any staff yelled at any residents in care. Allegation #2: Staff denies resident water. - Based on information received during interviews LPA was unable to corroborate the allegation. 4 out 5 residents, 1 resident refused to be interviewed and 3 out of 4 staff stated that they have not witnessed/observed any staff denied water to any residents in care. *** Continuation in LIC9099C *** Unsubstantiated Allegation #3 Staff do not ensure resident is provided with toileting assistance. - Based on interviews, information received during the investigation LPA was unable to corroborate the allegation. Interviews indicated that most residents does not need help for toileting and they have not witness any staff not providing assistance to a residence in need of toileting assistance. During the investigation, LPA did not find evidence to corroborate the allegations. Based on the evidence, the allegations mentioned above are UNSUBSTANTIATED. A finding that the complaint is UNSUBSTANTIATED means although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated at this time. An exit interview was conducted where this report, LIC9099 was discussed and provided to House Manager Mistie Felton.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 14, 2025 · control 56-AS-20240411114451
20244 state visits · 7 documents
Nov 25, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff did not inform resident’s physician of resident’s change of condition Staff did not provide adequate medication assistance to residents in care Staff refuse to call an ambulance for residents in care Staff threatened residents in care Staff did not ensure sufficient food items were available at the facility for residents in care Staff did not prevent residents from engaging in inappropriate interactions Staff yelled at residents in care Staff did not assist residents that sustained falls Centrally stored medications are accessible to residents in care
Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Sarina Ramirez and Becky Mann conducted an unannounced visit to the facility to conduct a complaint investigation on the above allegations. LPAs met with House Manager Mistie Felton, and discussed the purpose of the visit. Regarding the allegation #1 LPA Ramirez and LPA Mann conducted 3 staff interviews. 3 out of the 3 staff informed LPAs staff inform innovage as soon as they observe a change or condition LPA Ramirez and LPA Mann conducted 5 resident interviews. 5 out of the 5 residents informed LPAs they get assessed yearly by a physician, LPAs observed and reviewed records showing all residents have up to date physician reports. Regarding the allegation #2 LPA Ramirez and LPA Mann conducted 3 staff interviews. 3 out of the 3 staff informed LPAs they provide adequate medication assistance to residents Unsubstantiated LPA Ramirez and LPA Mann conducted 5 resident interviews. 5 out of the 5 residents informed LPAs staff provide adequate medication assistance. Regarding the allegation #3 LPA Ramirez and LPA Mann conducted 3 staff interviews. 3 out of the 3 staff informed LPAs staff do not refuse to call ambulance for residents in care. LPA Ramirez and LPA Mann conducted 5 resident interviews. 5 out of the 5 residents informed LPAs staff do not refuse to call ambulance for residents when ambulance services is needed. Regarding the allegation #4 LPA Ramirez and LPA Mann conducted 3 staff interviews. 3 out of the 3 staff informed LPAs staff do not threaten residents in care. LPA Ramirez and LPA Mann conducted 5 resident interviews. 5 out of the 5 residents informed LPAs staff do not threaten the residents. Regarding the allegation #5 LPA Ramirez and LPA Mann conducted 3 staff interviews. 3 out of the 3 staff informed LPAs staff ensure there is sufficient food items available at the facility for residents in care. 3 out of the 3 staff stated they go grocery shopping weekly. LPA Ramirez and LPA Mann conducted 5 resident interviews. 5 out of the 5 residents informed LPAs facility has sufficient food items available for all residents in care. Regarding the allegation #6 LPA Ramirez and LPA Mann conducted 3 staff interviews. 3 out of the 3 staff informed LPAs there is no inappropriate interactions with residents in care at the facility. LPA Ramirez and LPA Mann conducted 3 resident interviews. 3 out of the 3 residents informed LPAs they do not engage in inappropriate interactions with other residents. Regarding the allegation #7 LPA Ramirez and LPA Mann conducted 3 staff interviews. 3 out of the 3 staff informed LPAs staff do not yell at residents in care. LPA Ramirez and LPA Mann conducted 5 resident interviews. 5 out of the 5 residents informed LPAs staff do not yell at residents. Regarding the allegation #8 LPA Ramirez and LPA Mann conducted 3 staff interviews. 3 out of the 3 staff informed LPAs staff assist residents that sustain falls LPA Ramirez and LPA Mann conducted 5 resident interviews. 5 out of the 5 residents informed LPAs they have not fallen at the facility. Regarding the allegation #9 LPA Ramirez and LPA Mann conducted 3 staff interviews 2 out of the 3 staff stated the medication is centrally locked and inaccessible to residents in care. 1 out of the 3 staff stated they do not administer medication. LPAs observed medication is locked in a cabinet inaccessible to residents in care Based on LPAs observations, record review, and interviews, the above allegations are Unsubstantiated; meaning that although the allegation may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur. An exit interview was conducted where this report was discussed and a copy with appeal rights was provided to House Manager Mistie Felton at the conclusion of the visit.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 25, 2024 · control 56-AS-20241120141939
Nov 25, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff do not have a fire evacuation plan at the facility Staff do not have an infection control plan at the facility Staff are not following reporting requirements Staff left residents unattended
Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Sarina Ramirez and Becky Mann conducted an unannounced visit to the facility to conduct a complaint investigation on the above allegations. LPAs met with House Manager Mistie Felton, and discussed the purpose of the visit. Regarding the allegation #1 LPA Ramirez and LPA Mann conducted 3 staff interviews. 3 out of the 3 staff informed LPAs staff has a fire evacuation plan, staff stated their meeting point is outside infront of the facility. LPAs observed and reviewed records the last fire drill conducted was 10/07/24 Regarding the allegation #2 LPA Ramirez and LPA Mann conducted 3 staff interviews. 3 out of the 3 staff informed LPAs staff has a infection control plan, LPAs observed and reviewed records facility has a infection control plan Unsubstantiated Regarding the allegation #3 LPA Ramirez and LPA Mann conducted 3 staff interviews. 3 out of the 3 staff informed LPAs staff follow reporting requirements. Regarding the allegation #4 LPA Ramirez and LPA Mann conducted 3 staff interviews. 3 out of the 3 staff informed LPAs staff do not leave residents unattended. LPA Ramirez and LPA Mann conducted 5 resident interviews. 5 out of the 5 residents informed LPAs staff do not leave residents unattended. Based on LPAs observations, record review, and interviews, the above allegations are Unsubstantiated; meaning that although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur. An exit interview was conducted where this report was discussed and a copy with appeal rights was provided to House Manager Mistie Felton at the conclusion of the visit.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 25, 2024 · control 56-AS-20241120141939
Nov 25, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff consume liquor while on shift Staff do not have fingerprint clearance Staff lock facility doors to prevent residents from leaving Staff insert suppositories to residents in care Staff did not complete required trainings Staff facility records are falsified Staff did not maintain resident records Residents are not provided proper food service Staff did not ensure resident’s diapering needs were met
Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Sarina Ramirez and Becky Mann conducted an unannounced visit to the facility to conduct a complaint investigation on the above allegations. LPAs met with House Manager Mistie Felton, and discussed the purpose of the visit. Regarding the allegation #1 LPA Ramirez and LPA Mann conducted 3 staff interviews. 3 out of the 3 staff informed LPAs staff do not consume liquor while on shift. LPA Ramirez and LPA Mann conducted 5 resident interviews. 5 out of the 5 residents informed LPAs staff do not consume liquor while on shift. Regarding the allegation #2 LPA Ramirez and LPA Mann conducted 3 staff interviews. 3 out of the 3 staff informed LPAs all staff have fingerprint clearance, LPAs observed and reviewed records showing all staff Unsubstantiated have fingerprint clearance. Regarding the allegation #3 LPA Ramirez and LPA Mann conducted 3 staff interviews. 3 out of the 3 staff informed LPAs staff do not lock doors to prevent residents from leaving, 2 out of the 3 staff stated doors are locked at night when residents are sleeping. LPA Ramirez and LPA Mann conducted 5 resident interviews. 5 out of the 5 residents informed LPAs the doors are not locked to prevent them from leaving Regarding the allegation #4 LPA Ramirez and LPA Mann conducted 3 staff interviews. 3 out of the 3 staff informed LPAs staff do not insert suppositories in residents. LPA Ramirez and LPA Mann conducted 5 resident interviews. 5 out of the 5 residents informed LPAs staff do no insert suppositories in residents. Regarding the allegation #5 LPA Ramirez and LPA Mann conducted 3 staff interviews. 3 out of the 3 staff informed LPAs staff complete all required trainings. LPAs observed and reviewed records all staff have all required trainings. Regarding the allegation #6 LPA Ramirez and LPA Mann conducted 3 staff interviews. 3 out of the 3 staff informed LPAs staff records are not falsified. LPAs observed and reviewed records and no staff records are falsified. Regarding the allegation #7 LPA Ramirez and LPA Mann reviewed and observed staff maintain resident records. Regarding the allegation #8 LPA Ramirez and LPA Mann conducted 3 staff interviews. 3 out of the 3 staff informed LPAs residents are provided proper food service LPA Ramirez and LPA Mann conducted 5 resident interviews. 5 out of the 5 residents informed LPAs residents are provided with proper food service. Regarding the allegation #9 LPA Ramirez and LPA Mann conducted 3 staff interviews. 3 out of the 3 staff informed LPAs there are no residents in care that need assistance with diaper needs, however 3 out of the 3 staff stated they will assist with diaper needs if needed. LPA Ramirez and LPA Mann conducted 5 resident interviews. 5 out of the 5 residents informed LPAs they do not need diaper assistance and can independently use the restroom on their own. Based on LPAs observations, record review, and interviews, the above allegations are Unsubstantiated; meaning that although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur. An exit interview was conducted where this report was discussed and appeal rights were provided to House Manager Mistie Felton at the conclusion of the visit.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 25, 2024 · control 56-AS-20241120141939
Nov 25, 2024Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Sarina Ramirez and Becky Mann made an unannounced visit to the facility to conduct a required annual inspection. LPAs met with House Manager Mistie Felton, and discussed the purpose of the visit. The facility is a Residential Care Facility for the Elderly (RCFE). License capacity of (6) with a current census of (6). LPAs conducted an overall inspection of the facility, which included, but was not limited to, the following: Physical Plant: Indoor passageways are free of obstruction. The facility has sufficient lighting and is maintained at a comfortable temperature. Resident’s bathrooms are equipped with grab rails and operating in safe and sanitary conditions. The hot water temperature in residents' bathrooms measured between 106 to 111 degrees F. Resident’s bedrooms have sufficient lighting and bedroom furniture is in good repair. Facility has operating carbon monoxide alarms, laundry service, and telephone service. The facility has sufficient linens, towels, and personal hygiene items for residents. The facility has posted in a common area, Community Care Licensing complaint poster, Ombudsman poster,personal rights, facility license, personnel report, resident roster, disaster evacuation plan and emergency telephone numbers. Yards/Outside: Outdoor passageways are free of obstruction. The facility has no bodies of water accessible to residents in care. The facility is enclosed with self-latching gates. Outdoor shaded area is sufficient for resident activities. Food Service: Facility has sufficient non-perishable and perishable food supply for residents in care. The refrigerator and freezer are operating in a healthful manner. Sharps, Disinfectants, and other cleaning solutions were kept locked and stored away inaccessible to residents in care.. Care & Supervision: Facility has 24-hour/7 days a week care staff. Staff working have criminal record clearances or exemptions through the Department. Record Review: LPAs reviewed 6 resident files and 5 staff files. Licensee did not maintain a transfer of criminal record for S1, staff is not associated with the facility, deficiency will be issued. LPA observed facility's last emergency drill was conducted on 10/07/24 Medical Related Services: All medication is centrally stored, administered as prescribed and kept in a locked closet, inaccessible to residents in care. Deficiencies were cited during today's visit and a plan of correction was discussed with facility representative, Mistie Felton. An exit interview was conducted and copies of the licensing reports with appeal rights were provided to the House Manager Mistie Felton at the conclusion of the visit.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 25, 2024
Oct 7, 2024Facility evaluation reportCase Management - DeficienciesDeficiency page: Type B
Type of visit: Case Management - Deficiencies
Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Magda Malcore and Renese Howell-Small initiated a case management based on deficiencies observed during complaint investigation #56-AS-20241004092109 visit. LPA's met with House Manager, Mistie Felton and informed the purpose of the visit. LPAs requested to review files for resident #1 (R1) who left the facility in August 2024 and resident #2 (R2) who left in July 2024. LPAs were informed by the House Manager that the facility not longer had record of both residents. A deficiency is being cited in accordance of Title 22, division 6, of the California Code of Regulations. An exit interview was conducted where this report and a plan of correction was discussed. A copy of this report was provided with Appeal Rights to the House Manager at the conclusion of the visit.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 7, 2024
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87506(e) · Plan of correction due date: Oct 14, 2024
87506 Resident Records(e) Original records or photographic reproductions shall be retained for a minimum of three (3) years following termination of service to the resident. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: The licensee did not comply with the section cited above by not maintaining records for resident #1 and resident #2 at the facility for 3 years after termination of services, which poses a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 7, 2024
Plan of correction: The Licensee/Administrator shall submit a self-certified statement of understanding on the regulation cited and submit the statement to the Licensing Agency by POC due date.
Jun 12, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff are mismanaging resident's medication Staff are engaging in inappropriate behaviors in the presence of residents Staff did not keep resident's personal information confidential
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Magda Malcore conducted an unannounced visit to the facility to deliver findings on the above allegations. LPA met with House Manager, Mistie Felton, and discussed the purpose of the visit. Regarding the allegation, staff are mismanaging resident's medication, staff interviewed deny mismanaging resident’s medications. Four (4) out of five (5) residents interviewed deny that staff have mismanaged their medications. Regarding the allegation, staff are engaging in inappropriate behaviors in the presence of residents, staff interviewed deny engaging in inappropriate behaviors in the presence of residents. Four (4) out of five (5) residents interviewed deny that staff are engaging in inappropriate behaviors in their presence. Regarding the allegation, staff did not keep resident's personal information confidential, staff interviewed deny not keeping resident’s personal information confidential. Four (4) out of five (5) residents interviewed deny that staff do not keep their personal information confidential. Unsubstantiated Based on LPA observations and interviews with residents and staff, the allegations are Unsubstantiated. An unsubstantiated finding means that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur. An exit interview was conducted where this report was discussed and a copy with Appeal Rights was provided to the House manager, Felton at the conclusion of the visitthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 12, 2024 · control 56-AS-20231227145548
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87303(a) · Plan of correction due date: Jun 13, 2024
The facility shall be clean, safe, sanitary and in good repair at all times. Maintenance shall include provision of maintenance services and procedures for the safety and well-being of residents, employees and visitors. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: The licensee did not comply with the section cited above by not obtaining outside pest control services to ensure the facility was free of mice, which poses a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 12, 2024
Plan of correction: The Licensee/Administrator shall submit to the Licensing Agency proof of pest control services contracted by 6/13/2024 and submit documentation completed services by 6/18/2024.
Jan 4, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff are not properly cleaning the floors
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Magda Malcore conducted an unannounced complaint visit to the facility. LPA met with Mistie Felton, House Manager and discussed the purpose of the visit. Regarding the allegation, staff are not properly cleaning the floors, LPA observed the facility floors to be clean, two (2) staff interviewed deny that the floors are not properly clean, four (4) residents interviewed stated that the facility overall is kept clean. Based on LPA observations and interviews, the above allegation is Unsubstantiated. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur. An exit interview was conducted where this report was discussed, and a copy was provided to the House Manager at the conclusion of the visit. Unsubstantiated LPA conducted a tour of resident’s bedrooms. LPA observed a broken glass window in resident #1 (R1’s) bedroom. Based on LPA observations, the allegation is SUBSTANTIATED. A finding that the complaint is SUBSTANTIATED means that the allegation is valid because the preponderance of the evidence standard has been met. An exit interview was conducted where reports LIC9099/LIC9099-C/ LIC9099-D were discussed. A copy of the reports with Appeal Rights were provided to the House Manager at the conclusion of the visit.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 4, 2024 · control 56-AS-20231227145548
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87303(a) · Plan of correction due date: Jan 26, 2024
(a) The facility shall be clean, safe, sanitary and in good repair at all times. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: LPA observed missing tile pieces and loose tile pieces around the kitchen sink exposing rock and gravel. LPA conducted a toured of resident’s bedrooms. LPA observed a broken glass window in resident #1 (R1’s) bedroom; which poses a potential health, safety, or personal rights risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 4, 2024
Plan of correction: Licensee shall submit to the licensing agency proof of repairs or a self-certification that repairs have been made by POC due date.
The state marks this report as 6 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 4. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.
Earlier years2021 to 2023 · 5 documents
20231 state visit · 1 document
Nov 6, 2023Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Magda Malcore made an unannounced visit to the facility to conduct a required annual inspection. LPA met with Iren Creighton, Facility Representative, and discussed the purpose of the visit. The facility is a Residential Care Facility for the Elderly (RCFE). License capacity of (6) with a current census of (6). LPA conducted an overall inspection of the facility, which included, but was not limited to, the following: Physical Plant: Indoor passageways are free of obstruction. The facility has sufficient lighting and is maintained at a comfortable temperature. Resident’s bathrooms are equipped with grab rails and operating in safe and sanitary conditions. The hot water temperature in residents' bathrooms measured 112 degrees F. Resident’s bedrooms have sufficient lighting and bedroom furniture is in good repair. Facility has operating carbon monoxide alarms and telephone service. Facility fireplace is adequately screened. The facility has sufficient linen, towels, and personal hygiene items for residents. The facility has posted in a common area, Community Care Licensing complaint poster, Ombudsman poster, disaster evacuation plan and emergency telephone numbers. Yards/Outside: Outdoor passageways are free of obstruction. The facility has no bodies of water accessible to residents in care. The facility is enclosed with self-latching gates. Outdoor shaded area is sufficient for resident activities. Food Service: Facility has sufficient non-perishable and perishable food supply for residents in care. The refrigerator and freezer are operating in a healthful manner. Disinfectants and other cleaning solutions were kept locked and stored away from food areas. Care & Supervision: Facility has 24-hour/7 days a week care staff. Staff working have criminal record clearances or exemptions through the Department. Record Review: LPA reviewed (3) resident files and (3) staff files. Licensee did not maintain verification of staff #1 (S1) complete health screening results. Resident (R1) and resident #2 (R2) preplacement appraisals were observed incomplete. Licensee did not maintain proof of R1's complete health screening results. LPA observed facility's last emergency drill was conducted in July 2019. Facility did not maintain verification of liability insurance on file for licensing review. Medical Related Services: All medication is centrally stored, administered as prescribed and kept in a locked closet, inaccessible to residents in care. Deficiencies were cited during today's visit and a plan of correction was discussed with facility representative, Iren Creighton. An exit interview was conducted and copies of the licensing reports with appeal rights were provided to the facility representative at the conclusion of the visit.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 6, 2023
The state marks this report as 9 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 5. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.
20222 state visits · 3 documents
Nov 23, 2022Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated
Allegation investigated: . Staff are mismanaging medication. 2. Staff are not properly trained
Licensing Program Analysts Amber Coleman and Anna Bueno (LPA) arrived at the Rose Valley Facility to make an unannounced visit to initiate a complaint investigation. LPA’s were greeted and invited inside by staff member Delfina Villamore. LPA’s introduced self and stated purpose of the visit. LPA's conducted staff and resident interviews, records review, and pill count during the visit. It is alleged that staff are not properly trained and that the medication is being mismanaged. During the records review, LPA reviewed 6 resident Medication Administration Records (MARS) of 6 resident records, 4 records displayed that medications dispensed were not signed for. Dates November 12th through November 23rd were missing signatures. While conducting staff interview regarding missing signatures. S1 explained, "Sometimes they forget to sign, but the medication is given. I will remind them to sign." Pill count for R1 displayed that routine medications were dispensed appropriately. Review of personnel files revealed training materials were present, however there was no evidence that training was completed by staff members. We have substantiated the complaint allegation(s) as valid and that a violation has occurred based on the preponderance of available evidence. A copy of this report along with appeal rights are being reviewed with, and furnished to the facility representative. Please see LIC 9099D. A copy of this report along with appeal rights are being reviewed with and furnished to the facility representative. Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 23, 2022 · control 18-AS-20201006151422
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87411(C) · Plan of correction due date: Nov 23, 2022
All RCFE staff who assist residents with personal activities of daily living shall receive initial and annual training as specified in Health and Safety Code sections 1569.625 and 1569.69 This requirement was not met as evidenced by the lack of record or proof of completion of medication training could not be provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 23, 2022
Plan of correction: Administrator agreed to have a Hospice Agency come to the facility to provide medication training to staff members who work directly with residents with in the next 3 weeks. Administrator agreed to have medication training with hospice agency scheduled Administrator also agrees to move forward with in house training by January 2023.
Nov 23, 2022Facility evaluation reportCase Management - DeficienciesDeficiency page: Type A
Type of visit: Case Management - Deficiencies
Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Anna Bueno and Amber Coleman conducted an unannounced visit to subsequently investigate and deliver findings for complaint number: 18-AS-20201006151422. LPAs met with assistant administrator Iren Creighton who was explained the purpose of today’s visit. During complaint investigation, records reviewed revealed that one of six residents have a Dementia diagnosis. This facility is not licensed to admit Dementia residents and this facility does not hold a dementia care plan. This poses an immediate health and safety risk to residents in care. Refer to LIC-809D for deficiency cited. An exit interview was discussed with assistant administrator Iren Creighton. A copy of this report, LIC 809D, and appeal rights were provided to MS. Creighton.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 23, 2022
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87208(c) · Plan of correction due date: Nov 25, 2022
Plan of Operation - A licensee who accepts or retains residents diagnosed by a physician to have dementia shall include additional information in the plan of operation as specified in Section 87705(b). This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Resident 1 has a primary diagnosis of Dementia.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 23, 2022
Plan of correction: Licensee shall immediately place Resident 1 to another facility more appropriate for their level of care. Licensee shall notify the Department of this placement on or before the end of the POC date.
Aug 16, 2022Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Ryan Gardner made an unannounced visit to the facility. The purpose of the visit was to conduct a required annual inspection, with an emphasis on infection control due to the COVID-19 pandemic. LPA Gardner met with Caregiver Iren Creighton and was granted entry to the facility. At the time of visit there were three (3) staff, and six (6) residents present. LPA Gardner toured the facility inside and out and went over COVID-19 best practices for infection control and prevention with Iren Creighton. The facility has a plan in place which follows Community Care Licensing Division guidelines for COVID-19 testing, isolating/quarantining residents and properly caring for residents with COVID-19 positive results and/or exposures. The facility has a designated infection control lead person who has been tasked with tracking all COVID-19 cases and/or suspected cases, ensuring PPE supplies are maintained, cleaning and disinfection provisions are in adequate quantities, and that staff are trained in the proper use and disposal of PPE. The entrance of the facility has a check in process for visitors that includes a vaccination verification/negative COVID test check, a temperature check, and a symptom check. The residents have hand sanitizer available to them throughout the facility, and the bathrooms were stocked with hand soap and paper towels. The facility has postings throughout the facility for proper cough etiquette, proper hand washing procedure, and/or social distancing guidelines. LPA Gardner requested to inspect the facility's Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) supply, which was located in the front entry way. The facility has a limited supply of PPE items. The facility was notified they need to obtain a full thirty (30) day supply of PPE Items such as gloves, face shields, gowns, surgical masks, N95 masks, disinfectant, and hand sanitizer. All residents and staff are practicing all other COVID-19 precautions, which minimize the risk of them contracting COVID-19. Based on the observations made during today’s visit, no deficiencies were cited per Title 22, Division 6, of the California Code of Regulations. An exit interview was conducted, and this report was discussed and provided to Caregiver Iren Creighton.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 16, 2022
20211 state visit · 1 document
Oct 18, 2021Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Javier Prieto made an unannounced visit to the facility to conduct an annual inspection with an emphasis on infection control. LPA met with Ella Agdaca and explained the purpose of the visit. There are currently no cases of COVID-19 within the facility. During today's visit, LPA toured the facility and made observations pertaining to the facility's infection control measures. LPA observed proper signs throughout the facility, sufficient hand hygiene supplies, sufficient cleaning and disinfecting provisions, and proper use of face coverings. The facility has a designated infection control lead person who has been tasked with tracking all COVID-19 cases and/or suspected cases, ensuring PPE supplies are maintained, cleaning and disinfection provisions are in adequate quantities, and that staff are trained in the proper use and disposal of PPE and overall infection control. The facility has a plan in place which follows Community Care Licensing guidelines for when and how long to test staff and residents for COVID-19, when and how to isolate/quarantine residents, and when to schedule cleaning and disinfection times of high traffic and frequently touched areas. The facility also has a plan in place to monitor residents regularly for any changes in condition and to subsequently notify the resident's physician and to notify all emergency agencies in the event of any COVID-19 related and/or suspected illnesses. Based on the observations made during today’s visit, no deficiencies were cited per Title 22, Division 6, of the California Code or Regulations. An exit interview to review this report was conducted and a copy of this report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 18, 2021
6 of 6 beds were occupied at the April 14, 2026 state visit — a count on that day, not an opening.
License holder
3P Property II LLC, licensed since 2017.
The state’s totals for this licenseSince 2017, as the state’s facility page counts them
- State visits on file
- 18
- Total complaints
- 4
- Substantiated allegations
- 2
- Type A citations
- 1
- Type B citations
- 1
These are the state’s own totals for this license since 2017, per CDSS records. The state counts them apart from the documents above, and they can differ from what those documents show; the documents say what each visit found. One complaint can contain several allegations.
Compare with homes the same size
| This home | Typical | |
|---|---|---|
| Type A citations | 1 | 0 |
| Type B citations | 1 | 0 |
| Substantiated allegations | 2 | 0 |
| Total complaints | 4 | 0 |
“Typical” is the statewide median for licensed homes this size. It does not adjust for years licensed, and older licenses have had more visits and reports. The median is across the 6,916 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record. The figures compared are the state’s totals, not the documents.
What the state’s words mean
CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents stand in their place.
Frequently asked questions
A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.
Quick answers about Rose Valley Redlands
Is Rose Valley Redlands licensed?
The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
How many residents is Rose Valley Redlands licensed for?
6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Has Rose Valley Redlands been cited?
1 Type A and 1 Type B citations since 2017, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. Those records count 18 state visits over the same years.
Is Rose Valley Redlands still open?
This license was on the CDSS roster as of November 11, 2026.
What does Rose Valley Redlands cost?
$4,400 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $3,600–$5,400. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 10 small homes and similar homes within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
Among 6 other homes of a similar licensed size in Redlands that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $4,000 to $6,000 a month, and the middle figure is $5,050 (n = 6 other homes publishing a starting rate).
Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.
A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.
The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.
A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.
Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
Does Rose Valley Redlands take Medi-Cal?
On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated October 1, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
Who holds the license?
The license is held by 3P Property II LLC, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Is there a hospital nearby?
Redlands Community Hospital is 3.5 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.
Can Rose Valley Redlands keep a resident on hospice?
Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 6 residents, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Rose Valley Redlands license and inspection record
- Name on the license: “ROSE VALLEY REDLANDS”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
- License #361800187. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- Licensed for 6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- Licensed to 3P Property II LLC, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- First licensed in 2017, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- 18 state inspection visits since 2017, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- 1 Type A and 1 Type B citations on file since 2017, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. The same records count 18 state visits in that period.
- 4 complaints and 2 substantiated allegations on file since 2017, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
- The most recent state visit on file is October 8, 2026, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗
Nearby
Other homes nearby
Licensed homes near this one in San Bernardino County, most information on file first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.
- Map
Starting rate
$4,300 a month to start
Listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Starting rate
$5,800 a month to start
Listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$2,850 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $2,200–$3,650On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Map
Starting rate
$4,000 a month to start
Listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026On the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$4,200 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $3,450–$5,200On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$5,200 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $4,100–$6,850On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
Street maps © Protomaps · © OpenStreetMap
Explore San Bernardino County