Skip to main content
CovelightCare
  • Start your search

    • MapExplore homes by area and what matters to you.
    • Directory
    • Guided search
    • Medi-Cal care homes

    Take a closer look

    • Check a home
    • Compare homes
    • Ask homes for me
  • Step by step

    • All care guidesEvery guide, in the order you’ll need them.
    • 1Step 1: Learn the kinds of care homes
    • 2Step 2: Ways to pay for care
    • 3Step 3: Find homes and check them
    • 4Step 4: Visit, and get the papers before you sign
    • 5Step 5: Move in
    • 6Step 6: The first months, and your rights

    Start with a question

    • Who pays for a care home?
    • Does Medi-Cal pay for a care home?
    • Board and care or assisted living?
    • Leaving the hospital soon?
    • Can a care home make someone leave?
    • Print a visit checklist
    • Check a home’s license
  • Professional tools

    • All professional tools
    • Discharge planning
    • Care management
    • Fiduciaries
    • Elder-law attorneys
    • Public-record worklist

    Care home operators

    • Manage your home’s profileYour home’s information and family inquiries.
    • Claim a home
    • Operator sign in
  • Get to know Covelight

    • How we work
    • Our data & sources
    • What’s new
    • Suggest a correction
    • Contact us
Saved homesGuided search
  • Start your search

    • MapExplore homes by area and what matters to you.
    • Directory
    • Guided search
    • Medi-Cal care homes

    Take a closer look

    • Check a home
    • Compare homes
    • Ask homes for me
  • Step by step

    • All care guidesEvery guide, in the order you’ll need them.
    • 1Step 1: Learn the kinds of care homes
    • 2Step 2: Ways to pay for care
    • 3Step 3: Find homes and check them
    • 4Step 4: Visit, and get the papers before you sign
    • 5Step 5: Move in
    • 6Step 6: The first months, and your rights

    Start with a question

    • Who pays for a care home?
    • Does Medi-Cal pay for a care home?
    • Board and care or assisted living?
    • Leaving the hospital soon?
    • Can a care home make someone leave?
    • Print a visit checklist
    • Check a home’s license
  • Professional tools

    • All professional tools
    • Discharge planning
    • Care management
    • Fiduciaries
    • Elder-law attorneys
    • Public-record worklist

    Care home operators

    • Manage your home’s profileYour home’s information and family inquiries.
    • Claim a home
    • Operator sign in
  • Get to know Covelight

    • How we work
    • Our data & sources
    • What’s new
    • Suggest a correction
    • Contact us
Guided search
Golden Heritage Senior CareLicense #342701261 · Covelight Care
Covelight CareGolden Heritage Senior CareLicense #342701261 · 37 Mossglen Cir, Sacramento, CA · (916) 631-0694Record printed from covelightcare.com — data as of the dates shown on each item.
Home/California/Sacramento County/Sacramento/Golden Heritage Senior Care
Map · 37 Mossglen Cir

© Protomaps © OpenStreetMap

Estimated starting rate$4,550/mo

Covelight estimate · likely $3,750–$5,600 · See costs

Check availability

Request a tour

More days
  • AskThe cost, or your own question
  • (916) 631-0694

    From the state licensing record · October 26, 2026

Free for families. A home gets your number only if you say yes.

GH

Call Golden Heritage Senior Care

Sacramento · Licensed for 6

(916) 631-0694

From the state licensing record · October 26, 2026

or

Let us do the legwork

  • We ask about availability, price and the care you describe.
  • If it’s a fit, you choose whether they call you. Either way, you get every answer.
Check availabilityFree

Small home · Licensed for 6 · Sacramento

Golden Heritage Senior Care

37 Mossglen Cir, Sacramento, CA 95826 · Licensed since 2023

  • Overview
  • Care
  • Costs
  • Daily life
  • Location
  • State record

Golden Heritage Senior Care

Overview

Estimated starting rate

$4,550 a month

Covelight estimate · likely $3,750–$5,600 See costs

No openings reported

  • Approved by the state: Wheelchair · Dementia · HospiceState licensing record · October 26, 2026
  • Licensed for 6: a small care homeThe state license record

Ask this home

Check availability

Request a tour

More days
  • AskThe cost, or your own question

Free for families. A home gets your number only if you say yes.

Care and support

  • Wheelchairup to 6 residents
  • Dementia
  • Hospiceup to 1 resident

Not on file: bedridden approval.

Approved by the state · State licensing record · October 26, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.

Read the state’s own wording
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. APPROVED FIRE CLEARANCE FOR SIX(6) NON-AMBULATORY. APPROVED HOSPICE WAIVER FOR ONE(1) HOSPICE RESIDENT.

983 - RCFE / DEMENTIA

CDSS record, verbatim · October 26, 2026

As needs change

  • Staying through hospice

    Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 1 — care may continue at the end of life

    State licensing record · October 26, 2026

  • If memory loss develops

    Dementia-care designation on file

    State licensing record · October 26, 2026

We’ll ask for you. Not on file for Golden Heritage Senior Care: two-person transfers or a lift, who is awake overnight and help with medicines. When we check availability, we ask about these too.

Check availability

What it costs here

Covelight estimate

$4,550a month to start

Likely $3,750–$5,600

From 24 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file

Monthly cost breakdownWith a shared room and basic help · room, care and fees$4,550likely a month
Room
Daily care
Sharing the room
  • Starting monthly rate$4,550likely $3,750–$5,600

    Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 24 small homes and similar homes within 9 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

  • Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600

    Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (44 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).

  • One-time move-in fee$2,500one time · likely $0–$4,000

    Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,500 (133 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.

Likely monthly totalLikely $3,750–$5,800
$4,550
First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $4,400–$9,000
$7,050
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
  • MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
  • Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
  • Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated October 1, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
  • SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
  • VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
  • Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
If the money runs out, what Medi-Cal covers
Rates at nearby homes24 nearby homes publish starting rates of $2,000 to $6,000

$2,000$6,000

EstimateLikely rangeA nearby home’s published starting rate

24 homes like this within 9 miles publish starting rates mostly between $3,200–$5,000.

  • Courtyard TerraceSacramento · 2.7 mi · Mid-size home
    $4,345Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
  • Utopia Assisted LivingSacramento · 3.2 mi · Mid-size home
    $5,000Listed on its own website · starting price for housing and basic services · seen October 5, 2026
  • Sunny Beach VillaSacramento · 3.6 mi · Small home
    $3,200Listed on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026
  • Eastern ManorSacramento · 3.9 mi · Mid-size home
    $3,800Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
  • Abundant Love and Care for the ElderlyCarmichael · 4.2 mi · Small home
    $3,300Listed on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026
  • Marconi VillaSacramento · 4.5 mi · Small home
    $5,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
  • Cozy Home CareCarmichael · 4.8 mi · Small home
    $5,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living · seen September 9, 2026
  • Marylou's Home CareSacramento · 5.1 mi · Small home
    $3,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
  • Norris Senior HomeSacramento · 5.1 mi · Small home
    $5,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
  • Madison Square Senior Living IICarmichael · 5.2 mi · Small home
    $4,000Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
  • Ivy Ridge Assisted LivingSacramento · 5.3 mi · Mid-size home
    $2,600Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
  • Maria Teresa Home CareSacramento · 5.7 mi · Small home
    $2,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
  • Kentfield Estates Ranch RCFESacramento · 6.0 mi · Small home
    $4,000Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
  • Gene-Lyn Guest HomeSacramento · 6.1 mi · Small home
    $4,500Listed on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026
  • Royal Gardens Elder CareRancho Cordova · 6.2 mi · Small home
    $5,000Listed on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026
  • Siebenthal Care HomeSacramento · 6.2 mi · Small home
    $3,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
  • Splendor Oaks Senior Living 1Carmichael · 6.5 mi · Small home
    $3,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
  • Meraki of SacramentoSacramento · 6.7 mi · Mid-size home
    $3,500Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
  • Hollister Care HomeCarmichael · 6.8 mi · Small home
    $4,500Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
  • Twin Rivers at NatomasSacramento · 6.9 mi · Mid-size home
    $2,750Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
  • Love and Serenity IISacramento · 7.2 mi · Small home
    $3,500Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
  • Magnolia Elderly Care HomeFair Oaks · 7.8 mi · Small home
    $6,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living · seen September 9, 2026
  • Alaturi CareSacramento · 8.4 mi · Small home
    $5,000Listed on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026
  • Acc Assisted Living at Greenhaven TerraceSacramento · 8.7 mi · Mid-size home
    $2,800Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 24 small homes and similar homes within 9 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

  • Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
  • Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
  • Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
  • Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
  • We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
  • It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
  • The care level

    Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.

  • What is billed separately

    Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.

  • Move-in costs

    A one-time move-in fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.

  • Increases

    California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.

Ask for the price

An estimate for planning, not a quote. A home sets the price after hearing about the care needed.

Daily life

Daily life here is not on file yet. Most small homes haven’t published it, and that says nothing about the home.

The best way to see it is a visit.

Request a tour

Where it is

37 Mossglen Cir, Sacramento, CA 95826Address from the public record · October 26, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.

Opening the neighborhood map…

  1. 1Kaiser Foundation Hospital - SacramentoHospital · General acute care, on the state’s list3 mi

Straight-line distances; check the drive or the walk. Hospital: the nearest general acute care hospital on the state’s list (CDPH, September 16, 2026).

Open directions ↗

The state record

California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

CDSS public record, read October 26, 2026 · License #342701261 · See the state’s own record ↗

The last 36 months — 10 of 14 documents

Complaint outcomes in these 36 months, in the state’s words: 2 “Unsubstantiated”.

20262 state visits · 2 documents

Jul 24, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: The facility allowed excluded individuals to work in the facility. Staff are forging resident documents. The Administrator is not present at the facility for a sufficient amount of time.

icensing Program Analyst (LPA) Christina Valerio arrived unannounced to deliver complaint findings. LPA Valerio met with direct care staff, and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA Valerio spoke to Administrator Yelena who gave permission for staff on shift to sign on her behalf. LPA Valerio read the report to Administrator via cell phone. The investigation consisted of interviews with residents, interview with staff, a review of facility records, and personal observation of the facility. Allegation: The facility allowed excluded individuals to work in the facility. On 02/19/2026, LPA Valerio conducted an unannounced visit. LPA Valerio did not see excluded individual 1 (EI-1) or excluded individual 2 (EI-2) present in the facility. Continues on LIC 9099 - C... Unsubstantiated LPA Valerio interviewed facility staff. Facility staff denied ever seeing EI-1 or EI-2 in the facility. LPA Valerio interviewed Resident 1 (R1), Resident 2 (R2), Resident 3 (R3), Resident 4 (R4), Resident 5 (R5), and Resident 6 (R6). Residents were shown pictures of EI-1 and EI-2 and asked if they have seen the individuals or know their names. R1 did not recognize the people in the pictures. R2's interview was unsuccessful and could not confirm or deny any information. R3 denied ever seeing the individuals and stated R3 did not know them. R4 stated R4 has seen EI-1 and EI - 2 at the grocery store before. LPA asked if R4 seen them at the facility, R4 stated no. LPA asked the names of the people in the picture. The names provided by R4 did not match the names of the individuals. R5 stated R5 does not know the individuals in the picture and R5 is glad to be aware that they are not allowed to be at the facility. R6 was unaware of the individuals in the photo and has not seen them before. Allegation: Staff are forging resident documents On 02/19/2026, LPA Valerio obtained LIC 602 Physician Reports for R1 - R6. LPA Valerio contacted the physician and/or health center documented on the LIC 602. LPA was unable to confirm validity for R1's LIC 602. LPA was able to confirm the validity of the doctors signature for R2's LIC 602. LPA was able to confirm the validity of the doctors signature for R3's LIC 602. LPA was unable to confirm validity for R4's LIC 602. LPA Valerio could not confirm or deny the signature for R5's LIC 602 due to the number being out of service. LPA was able to confirm the validity of the doctors signature for R6's LIC 602. Allegation: The Administrator is not present at the facility for a sufficient amount of time. Staff 1 stated Administrator Yelena comes every week and will come for one or few hours. If staff need additional assistance, Administrator Yelena will come to the facility. R1 stated the administrator comes every week. R2's interview was unsuccessful and could not confirm or deny any information. R3 stated R3 does not know who Yelena is. R4 stated R4 did not know who Yelena is. R5 knows Administrator Yelena comes to the facility every week, but cannot recall exact days and times. R6 knows Administrator Yelena comes to the facility every week and stated "She comes when she comes." Continues on LIC 9099 - C, page 3... Yelena stated she is at the facility at least twenty (20) hours per week. She stated that it varies, honestly. She stated it can be more or less depending on which facility needs me more. According to the LIC 500, Administrator Yelena is at the facility every Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday and Friday from 8:00 AM to 12:00 PM. Based on all the information collected by the Department, although the allegation may have happened or is valid, here is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the allegation occurred, therefore this allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. California Code of Regulations (CCRs) - Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8, no deficiencies cited. An exit interview was held with Administrator Yelena via cell, and a copy of report was left at the facility with facility staff.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 24, 2026 · control 27-AS-20260211122308
Jun 2, 2026Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Christina Valerio arrived to the facility unannounced to conduct an annual required inspection. LPA Valerio met with Facility Staff Siteri and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA Valerio and staff toured the facility to ensure compliance with Title 22 regulations. LPA Valerio observed three (3) resident bedrooms. Resident bedrooms were fully furnished and free from odors. Resident bathrooms were observed to be fully stocked with hygiene supplies, such as paper towels, toilet paper, and hand soap. LPA Valerio observed additional hygiene supplies locked in a cabinet available for use. LPA Valerio observed medications, sharps, and toxins locked an inaccessible to residents in care. LPA Valerio observed an outside contractor painting the kitchen area and replacing the lights. The facility was observed to have an adequate food supply. LPA Valerio observed snacks accessible to the residents located near the kitchen area and dinning room. The exterior area was observed to have a large area for outdoor visitation and/or activities. LPA Valerio observed residents watching television in their room/living room, smoking outside in the backyard, and walking in the back yard. Staff was observed assisting with resident ADLs, cleaning, and assisting the contractor. LPA Valerio observed the fire extinguisher was fully charged with last annual service date of 09 of 2025. LPA Valerio spoke to staff and residents during the visit. LPA Valerio observed alarms to be in working condition. LPA Valerio reviewed staff and resident files. All files were observed to up to date with required documentation. LPA Valerio requested the following be sent to cclascpsacramentosouthRO@dss.ca.gov: LIC 500, LIC 308, LIC 610D, and copy of liability insurance Per California Code of Regulations (CCR) - Title 22 - no deficiencies were observed during today's visit. An exit interview was held, and a copy of this report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 2, 2026

20253 state visits · 4 documents

Aug 28, 2025Facility evaluation reportCase Management - OtherReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Other

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Vincent Moleski arrived unannounced to conduct a case management visit. LPA Moleski spoke with facility administrator Lyenna Bigelow over the phone and explained the purpose of the visit. Bigelow said that caregiver Siteri Senitirau could sign this report in her absence. LPA Moleski explained to Bigelow that a staff person (S1) had been subject to immediate orders of exclusion, which bars them from working, residing in, or being present in any facility licensed by the California Department of Social Services. Bigelow said that S1 had not worked at this facility since last year. LPA Moleski asked Bigelow to remove S1 from this facility's Guardian roster. Bigelow agreed to do so. An exit interview was held with Senitirau. A copy of this report, and a copy of the immediate exclusion orders, were left with Senitirau.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 28, 2025
Apr 16, 2025Facility evaluation reportCase Management - OtherReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Other

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Vincent Moleski arrived unannounced to conduct a case management visit. LPA Moleski texted facility administrator Lyenna Bigelow and explained the purpose of the visit. Bigelow said staff member Siteri Senitirau could sign this report. During this visit, LPA Moleski took scans from a resident's file (R1) and interviewed a staff member (S1). No deficiencies were cited during this visit. An exit interview was held and a copy of this report was left with Senitirau.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 16, 2025
Apr 14, 2025Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Vincent Moleski arrived unannounced to conduct an annual inspection. LPA Moleski spoke with facility administrator Lyenna Bigelow over the phone and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA Moleski reviewed six resident files (R1-R6) and three staff files (S1-S3). R2 was identified as bedridden on their latest LIC 602, dated 02/07/2025. Comments on the LIC 602 describe the resident as "bed bound," and suffering from motor impairment or paralysis. R2's latest appraisal, dated 02/18/2025, indicated that R2 was in bed all the time. In an interview during this visit, S1 referred to R2 as "bed bound." This facility has a fire clearance for six non-ambulatory residents, but is not cleared to accept or retain any bedridden residents. Medical records from an emergency room visit on 2/24/25 indicate that R3 received a CT scan of their head due to a "fall/ qeustionable [sic.] head injury." The CT scan revealed no internal bleeding or other signs of serious injury. LPA Moleski reviewed fax and email records and observed that no incident reports were received regarding this fall. LPA Moleski observed that three residents' admission agreements (R3, admitted 1/27/25, R4, admitted 2/10/25, and R6, admitted 3/14/25) did not include base rates for basic services. LPA Moleski toured the facility and inspected common areas, the kitchen, bedrooms, bathrooms, and backyard areas. Furniture and furnishings were sufficient to meet the needs of residents. The facility temperature was 69 degrees Fahrenheit, which is within the required range of 68 and 85 degrees. [continued on 809-C] The facility's water temperature was tested and measured 103 degrees Fahrenheit, which is not within the required range of 105 and 120 degrees. While touring the facility, LPA Moleski observed that the interior garage door was unlocked. LPA Moleski observed many cleaning solutions and chemicals out in the garage. A cabinet labeled "keep locked when not in use" and "must be locked at all times" was unlocked. Several different cleaning solutions were observed inside the unlocked cabinet. LPA Moleski observed one resident (R6) walk into the garage unaccompanied during this visit. LPA Moleski observed first aid supplies, a fully-charged and up-to-date fire extinguisher, and carbon monoxide/smoke detectors. LPA Moleski observed a minimum 2-day supply of perishable food and a minimum 7-day supply of nonperishable food. LPA Moleski observed a locked closet for the storage of medication. LPA Moleski observed locked cabinets for the storage of cleaning solutions and knives. LPA Moleski interviewed one staff member (S1). Residents were not able to be interviewed during this visit. This facility is cited per 22 CCR Sections 87202(a)(2), 87309(a), 87211(a)(1), 87303(e)(2) and 87507(g)(3)(A). Due to a violation of fire clearance requirements, an immediate civil penalty in the amount of $500 is hereby assessed. An exit interview was held with Bigelow. Appeal rights and a copy of this report were left with staff member Siteri Senitirau.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 14, 2025
Apr 14, 2025Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Vincent Moleski arrived unannounced to conduct an annual inspection. LPA Moleski spoke with facility administrator Lyenna Bigelow over the phone and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA Moleski reviewed six resident files (R1-R6) and three staff files (S1-S3). R2 was identified as bedridden on their latest LIC 602, dated 02/07/2025. Comments on the LIC 602 describe the resident as "bed bound," and suffering from motor impairment or paralysis. R2's latest appraisal, dated 02/18/2025, indicated that R2 was in bed all the time. In an interview during this visit, S1 referred to R2 as "bed bound." This facility has a fire clearance for six non-ambulatory residents, but is not cleared to accept or retain any bedridden residents. Medical records from an emergency room visit on 2/24/25 indicate that R3 received a CT scan of their head due to a "fall/ qeustionable [sic.] head injury." The CT scan revealed no internal bleeding or other signs of serious injury. LPA Moleski reviewed fax and email records and observed that no incident reports were received regarding this fall. LPA Moleski observed that three residents' admission agreements (R3, admitted 1/27/25, R4, admitted 2/10/25, and R6, admitted 3/14/25) did not include base rates for basic services. LPA Moleski toured the facility and inspected common areas, the kitchen, bedrooms, bathrooms, and backyard areas. Furniture and furnishings were sufficient to meet the needs of residents. The facility temperature was 69 degrees Fahrenheit, which is within the required range of 68 and 85 degrees. [continued on 809-C] The facility's water temperature was tested and measured 103 degrees Fahrenheit, which is not within the required range of 105 and 120 degrees. While touring the facility, LPA Moleski observed that the interior garage door was unlocked. LPA Moleski observed many cleaning solutions and chemicals out in the garage. A cabinet labeled "keep locked when not in use" and "must be locked at all times" was unlocked. Several different cleaning solutions were observed inside the unlocked cabinet. LPA Moleski observed one resident (R6) walk into the garage unaccompanied during this visit. LPA Moleski observed first aid supplies, a fully-charged and up-to-date fire extinguisher, and carbon monoxide/smoke detectors. LPA Moleski observed a minimum 2-day supply of perishable food and a minimum 7-day supply of nonperishable food. LPA Moleski observed a locked closet for the storage of medication. LPA Moleski observed locked cabinets for the storage of cleaning solutions and knives. LPA Moleski interviewed one staff member (S1). Residents were not able to be interviewed during this visit. This facility is cited per 22 CCR Sections 87202(a)(2), 87309(a), 87211(a)(1), 87303(e)(2) and 87507(g)(3)(A). Due to a violation of fire clearance requirements, an immediate civil penalty in the amount of $500 is hereby assessed. An exit interview was held with Bigelow. Appeal rights and a copy of this report were left with staff member Siteri Senitirau.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 14, 2025

20243 state visits · 4 documents

Nov 21, 2024Facility evaluation reportCase Management - OtherReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Other

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Vincent Moleski arrived unannounced to conduct a case management visit. LPA Moleski spoke with facility administrator Lyenna Bigelow over the phone and explained the purpose of the visit. Bigelow said caregiver Lesi Buinimasi could sign this report in her absence. This visit is to confirm immediate exclusion orders for a staff member (S1). Bigelow acknowledged that S1 is excluded effective immediately, which means that S1 cannot be allowed to work, live in, and/or have contact with clients in any residential facility licensed by the California Department of Social Services. Therefore, the Department orders this facility to remove S1 from any contact with clients and not allow this employee to be physically present in the facility. Bigelow said that S1 has not been working at this facility since at least 2023. Bigelow agreed to remove S1 from all facility Guardian rosters as soon as possible. No deficiencies were cited during this visit. An exit interview was held with Bigelow. A copy of this report and the immediate exclusion notice were left with Buinimasi. A signature on this report acknowledges receipt of these documents.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 21, 2024
May 6, 2024Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Vincent Moleski arrived unannounced to conduct an annual inspection. LPA Moleski met with facility administrator Yelena Bigelow and explained the purpose of the visit. Upon arrival, two staff members were present (S1-S2). LPA Moleski reviewed Guardian records and observed that S2 was not associated to this facility. S2 told LPA Moleski that S2 had started working at this facility today. Bigelow associated S2 during this visit. LPA Moleski reviewed six resident files (R1-R6) and five staff files (S1-S5). LPA Moleski toured the facility with staff and inspected common areas, the kitchen, bedrooms, bathrooms, and backyard areas. Furniture and furnishings were sufficient to meet the needs of residents. The facility temperature was 75 degrees Fahrenheit, which is within the required range of 68 and 85 degrees. The facility's water temperature measured 105 degrees Fahrenheit, which is within the required range of 105 and 120 degrees. LPA Moleski observed first aid supplies, a fully-charged and up-to-date fire extinguisher, and carbon monoxide/smoke detectors. LPA Moleski observed a minimum 2-day supply of perishable food and a minimum 7-day supply of nonperishable food. LPA Moleski observed a locked closet for the storage of medication. LPA Moleski observed locked cabinets for the storage of cleaning solutions and knives. [continued on 809-C] LPA Moleski interviewed two staff members (S1-S2) and one resident (R6). This facility hereby cited per 22 CCR Section 87355(e)(2). This facility was previously cited per 22 CCR Section 87355(e)(2) on 4/24/24. A $1,000 civil penalty is hereby assessed, as this is a repeat violation. A civil penalty in the amount of $100 per day for one day is hereby assessed for one day worked by a caregiver not associated to this facility (S2). An exit interview was held with Bigelow. Appeal rights and a copy of this report were left with Bigelow.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 6, 2024
Apr 24, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff pushed resident.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Vincent Moleski arrived unannounced to follow up on this complaint investigation. LPA Moleski met with facility administrator Yelena Bigelow and explained the purpose of the visit. This investigation consisted of interviews, observation, and record review. LPA Moleski interviewed Bigelow, a staff member (S1) and four residents (R1, R2, R3, R6). During an interview, Bigelow said that a resident (R1) had been experiencing unusual behaviors during the time period of March 2, 2024 through March 4, 2024. Bigelow said during this time period, R1 had poured water all over the facility’s floors, was urinating in the facility, and on March 4, splashed water on S1. Afterward, R1 claimed that S1 had pinned R1 on the floor, according to Bigelow. Bigelow said R1 was diagnosed with a urinary tract infection after being sent out to the hospital. [continued on 9099-C] Unsubstantiated During an interview, LPA Moleski asked R1 about the events on March 4, 2024. R1 said there was “water everywhere.” R1 said that S1 had pushed R1, but also said that R1 had fallen. LPA Moleski did not observe any unusual injuries on R1 during this interview which would indicate physical abuse. LPA Moleski reviewed R1’s file. R1 is diagnosed with bipolar disorder, but does not have dementia, according to R1’s LIC 602 dated 1/18/24. During an interview, S1 said that R1 splashed water on S1 on March 2, 2024, then did so again on March 4, 2024. S1 said that after this second incident, R1 grabbed a plate and raised it to strike S1. S1 said S1 grabbed R1’s wrist and removed the plate from R1’s hand, but did not push R1. S1 said R1 had not fallen during the incident. S1 said the incident occurred in the facility’s living room, but said no others were present to witness the events as described. S1 said police were called and R1 was later sent out to the hospital. In interviews, R2, R3, and R6 did not report having been physically abused by staff while living at the facility. The department has determined the following as it relates to the allegation that staff pushed a resident: Based on interviews, observation, and record review, the above allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED, which means that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred. No deficiencies were cited regarding this allegation. An exit interview was held and a copy of this report was left with Bigelow.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 24, 2024 · control 27-AS-20240304171144
Apr 24, 2024Facility evaluation reportCase Management - DeficienciesDeficiency pages: Type A

Type of visit: Case Management - Deficiencies

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Vincent Moleski arrived unannounced to conduct a complaint investigation. However, upon arrival, LPA Moleski observed multiple deficiencies. LPA Moleski met with facility administrator Yelena Bigelow and explained the purpose of the visit. Shortly after LPA Moleski had parked his car, around 9 a.m., LPA Moleski observed a resident (R1) walking toward the facility from the community. LPA Moleski observed R1 round a corner from elsewhere in the community and walk to the facility, and enter the backyard through a side gate. R1 was unassisted while out in the community. LPA Moleski entered the facility shortly after R1 and was met by a staff member (S1). S1 provided their name and birth date to LPA Moleski. LPA Moleski reviewed Guardian records and observed that S1 was not associated to this facility. S1 said this was their first day at this facility. LPA Moleski reviewed R1's file and observed that R1 is not able to leave the facility unassisted. LPA Moleski asked S1 if S1 was aware that R1 had taken a walk. S1 said they were not aware. LPA Moleski interviewed R1, who said that R1 had taken a walk to search for cigarette butts. LPA Moleski and Bigelow observed that the alarm on the sliding door into the backyard was not turned on. This facility is hereby cited per 22 CCR Section 87411(a) and 87355(e)(2). This facility was previously cited per 22 CCR Section 87411(a) on 11/9/23 due to a previous AWOL by R1. As this is a repeat citation, a civil penalty in the amount of $1,000 is hereby assessed. An additional civil penalty of $100 is hereby assessed for one day worked by S1 while not associated to this facility. An exit interview was held with Bigelow. Appeal rights and a copy of this report were left with Bigelow.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 24, 2024

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87411(a) · Plan of correction due date: Apr 25, 2024

"(a) Facility personnel shall at all times be sufficient in numbers, and competent to provide the services necessary to meet resident needs. ...The licensing agency may require any facility to provide additional staff whenever it determines through documentation that the needs of the particular residents, the extent of services provided, or the physical arrangements of the facility require such additional staff for the provision of adequate services." This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on observation and record review, R1 was in the community unattended, despite being unable to do so per doctor's orders, which poses an immediate health and safety risk.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 24, 2024

Plan of correction: Licensee agrees to provide R1 with cigarettes to prevent his elopements, and to install an alarm on the backyard side gate. Additionally, licensee agrees to ensure that all other alarms are regularly checked for functionality. Licensee shall provide LPA Moleski a written plan describing how the above will be accomplished by POC due date. vincent.moleski@dss.ca.gov

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR87355(e)(2) · Plan of correction due date: Apr 25, 2024

"(e) All individuals subject to a criminal record review pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 1569.17(b) shall prior to working, residing or volunteering in a licensed facility: ... (2) Request a transfer of a criminal record clearance as specified in Section 87355(c) ..." This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on observation and record review, S1 worked in this facility without criminal record association, which poses an immediate health and safety risk.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 24, 2024

Plan of correction: Licensee agrees to submit transfer requests for all unassociated staff by POC due date. Licensee shall cc LPA Moleski on all electronic communication with transfer request staff. sacasctransferrequest@dss.ca.gov

Earlier years2023 · 4 documents

20234 state visits · 4 documents

Nov 9, 2023Facility evaluation reportCase Management - OtherDeficiency pages: Type A, Type B

Type of visit: Case Management - Other

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Vincent Moleski arrived unannounced to conduct a case management visit. LPA Moleski spoke with facility administrator Yelena Bigelow over the phone and explained the purpose of the visit. Bigelow said staff member Sandra Robinson could sign this report in her absence. LPA Moleski reviewed facility records comprised of daily notes taken by a staff member (S1). Daily notes for 10/28/23 indicate that a resident (R1) left the facility, "lost his way" and was returned to the facility by "someone." S1 confirmed that R1 was out in the community alone. S1 said R1 was returned by a community member. Bigelow said R1 left the facility because R1 did not have cigarettes. R1's LIC 602 indicates that R1 cannot leave the facility without assistance. LPA Moleski photographed the daily notes and the LIC 602. LPA Moleski did not receive an incident report regarding this incident. Bigelow said she did not send an incident report. This facility is being cited per 22 CCR Sections 87411(a) and 87211(a)(1)(D). Appeal rights and a copy of this report were left with Robinson.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 9, 2023

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87411(a) · Plan of correction due date: Nov 10, 2023

Personnel requirements: "Facility personnel shall at all times be sufficient in numbers, and competent to provide the services necessary to meet resident needs. In facilities licensed for sixteen or more, sufficient support staff shall be employed to ensure provision of personal assistance and care as required in Section 87608, Postural Supports. Additional staff shall be employed as necessary to perform office work, cooking, house cleaning, laundering, and maintenance of buildings, equipment and grounds. The licensing agency may require any facility to provide additional staff whenever it determines through documentation that the needs of the particular residents, the extent of services provided, or the physical arrangements of the facility require such additional staff for the provision of adequate services." This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interview, R1 left the facility unassisted on 11/9/23, which poses an immediate health and safety risk.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 9, 2023

Plan of correction: Licensee agrees to provide a written plan addressing staffing needs at the facility by the POC due date. Licensee agrees to email LPA Moleski this written plan. Failure to correct the deficiency by the POC due date may result in civil penalties. vincent.moleski@dss.ca.gov

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR87211(a)(1)(D) · Plan of correction due date: Nov 10, 2023

Reporting requirements: "(a) Each licensee shall furnish to the licensing agency such reports as the Department may require, including, but not limited to, the following: (1) A written report shall be submitted to the licensing agency and to the person responsible for the resident within seven days of the occurrence of any of the events specified in (A) through (D) below. This report shall include the resident's name, age, sex and date of admission; date and nature of event; attending physician's name, findings, and treatment, if any; and disposition of the case. (D) Any incident which threatens the welfare, safety or health of any resident, such as psychological abuse of a resident by staff or other residents, or unexplained absence of any resident." This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interviews, a resident AWOL was not reported, which poses a potential health and safety risk.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 9, 2023

Plan of correction: Licensee agrees to review reporting requirements and provide a written statement of acknowledgement by the POC due date. Licensee agrees to email LPA Moleski this written statement. Failure to correct the deficiency by the POC due date may result in civil penalties. vincent.moleski@dss.ca.gov

Oct 23, 2023Facility evaluation reportPost LicensingReport on file

Type of visit: Post Licensing

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Vincent Moleski arrived unannounced to conduct a postlicensing inspection. LPA Moleski met with facility administrator Yelena Bigelow and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA Moleski reviewed four resident files (R1-R4) and three staff files (S1-S3). LPA Moleski toured the facility with Bigelow and inspected common areas, the kitchen, bedrooms, bathrooms, and backyard areas. Furniture and furnishings were sufficient to meet the needs of residents. The facility temperature was 73 degrees Fahrenheit, which is within the required range of 68 and 85 degrees. LPA Moleski observed first aid supplies, a fully-charged and up-to-date fire extinguisher, and working carbon monoxide/smoke detectors. LPA Moleski observed a minimum 2-day supply of perishable food and a minimum 7-day supply of nonperishable food. LPA Moleski observed a locked closet for the storage of medication. LPA Moleski observed locked cabinets for the storage of cleaning solutions and knives. LPA Moleski interviewed one staff member (S2) and two residents (R3, R5). No deficiencies were cited during this visit. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report was left with Bigelow.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 23, 2023
May 5, 2023Facility evaluation reportPrelicensingReport on file

Type of visit: Prelicensing

On 5/5/23 at 9:00am Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kevin Gould arrived at Golden Heritage Senior Care for the purpose of conducting a Change of Ownership, pre-licensing inspection. LPA met with Licensee, Yelena Bigelow and together conducted a tour of the home. LPA and Licensee evaluated the physical plant to ensure the health and safety of the residents in care. Areas inspected are including but not limited to the kitchen, resident bedrooms; resident bathrooms, living and dining room and outdoor areas. LPA observed the facility to be free of odor, clean and in good repair. LPA observed that all rooms are equipped with the required furniture and sufficient lighting throughout the facility. LPA measured the water temperature, temperature measured at 106 degrees F which meets the 105-120 degree Fahrenheit regulation. LPA observed sufficient seven day non-perishable and two day perishable food supplies. Fire extinguishers and smoke detectors are current and in compliance with fire safety. LPA notes the facility had the required carbon monoxide detectors. First aid kit was checked and is complete. LPA observed centrally stored medications secure from residents. LPA Gould and conducted component III RCFE orientation with Licensee. . Per California Code of Regulations, Title 22 there were no deficiencies cited during today's inspection. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report was left at the facility. This facility has met all requirements to be licensed. LPA Gould will submit facility for licensure.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 5, 2023
Apr 20, 2023Facility evaluation reportOfficeReport on file

Type of visit: Office

Facility Type: RCFE Application Type: CHOW Capacity: 6 Census (if any clients in care): 5 COMP II Participants: Yelena Bigelow, Licensee/Administrator Interview Method: Telephone Interview On April 20, 2023, applicant/administrator participated in COMP II. Identification of the applicant and administrator was verified through interview questions based on photo ID and other identifying personal information. During COMP II, applicant and administrator confirmed that they have read and understand community care facility licensing laws included in the Health and Safety Codes and the California Code of Regulations Title 22. Signed LIC 809 with copy of photo ID have been obtained. During COMP II, CAB analyst confirmed Applicant/Administrator’s understanding of following areas: 1. Facility operation: License type, client/resident populations, and program 2. Admission Policies 3. Staffing requirements & Training 4. Restrictive/Prohibited Health Conditions 5. General provisions 6. Emergency Preparedness 7. Complaints & Reporting 8. Pre-licensing readinessthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 20, 2023

6 of 6 beds were occupied at the July 24, 2026 state visit, the most recent — a count on that day, not an opening.

License holder

Golden Heritage Senior Care LLC, licensed since 2023.

Operates 4 licensed homes in California. Running more than one home is common and is neither good nor bad on its own.

  • Golden Heritage Senior Care II · Sacramento
  • Golden Heritage Senior Care III · Sacramento
  • Golden Heritage Senior Care IV · Elk Grove
The state’s totals for this licenseSince 2023, as the state’s facility page counts them
State visits on file
13
Total complaints
2
Substantiated allegations
0
Type A citations
0
Type B citations
0

These are the state’s own totals for this license since 2023, per CDSS records. The state counts them apart from the documents above, and they can differ from what those documents show; the documents say what each visit found. One complaint can contain several allegations.

Compare with homes the same size
This homeTypical
Type A citations00
Type B citations00
Substantiated allegations00
Total complaints20

“Typical” is the statewide median for licensed homes this size. It does not adjust for years licensed, and older licenses have had more visits and reports. The median is across the 6,916 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record. The figures compared are the state’s totals, not the documents.

What the state’s words mean
Routine visita visit the state records as “Required” — a scheduled visit, not one made in answer to a complaintSubstantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedthere was not enough evidence to prove a violation occurred — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe evidence showed the allegation was false, could not have happened, or had no reasonable basisType A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗

An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents stand in their place.

Open CDSS facility search ↗Report a record errorOperate this home? Respond or correct, free →
Frequently asked questions

A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

Quick answers about Golden Heritage Senior Care

Is Golden Heritage Senior Care licensed?

The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.

How many residents is Golden Heritage Senior Care licensed for?

6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.

Has Golden Heritage Senior Care been cited?

0 Type A and 0 Type B citations since 2023, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. Those records count 13 state visits over the same years.

Is Golden Heritage Senior Care still open?

This license was on the CDSS roster as of November 11, 2026.

What does Golden Heritage Senior Care cost?

$4,550 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $3,750–$5,600. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 24 small homes and similar homes within 9 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

Among 21 other homes of a similar licensed size in Sacramento that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $3,149 to $5,000 a month, and the middle figure is $3,800 (n = 21 other homes publishing a starting rate).

Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date between September and October 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.

A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.

The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.

A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.

Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.

Does Golden Heritage Senior Care take Medi-Cal?

On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated October 1, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.

Who holds the license?

The license is held by Golden Heritage Senior Care LLC, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. See the homes licensed to Golden Heritage Senior Care LLC — at least 4 on the state roster.

Is there a hospital nearby?

Kaiser Foundation Hospital - Sacramento is 3 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.

Can Golden Heritage Senior Care keep a resident on hospice?

Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 1 resident, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.

Golden Heritage Senior Care license and inspection record

  • Name on the license: “GOLDEN HERITAGE SENIOR CARE”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
  • License #342701261. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
  • Licensed for 6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
  • Licensed to Golden Heritage Senior Care LLC, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
  • First licensed in 2023, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
  • 13 state inspection visits since 2023, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
  • 0 Type A and 0 Type B citations on file since 2023, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. The same records count 13 state visits in that period.
  • 2 complaints and 0 substantiated allegations on file since 2023, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
  • The most recent state visit on file is July 24, 2026, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Type A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗

See the state’s own record

Nearby

Other homes nearby

Licensed homes near this one in Sacramento County, most information on file first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.

  • Map

    Sacramento · 1.4 mi

    Ivy Park at Sacramento

    Large community · licensed for 70

    Starting rate

    $4,595 a month to start

    Listed by the home on its own website · October 27, 2026

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record
    • Dementia: on the state record
    • Hospice: on the state record
    • Bedridden: on the state record
  • Map

    Sacramento · 0.3 mi

    Jazba Glenroy

    Small home · licensed for 6

    Estimated starting rate

    $4,500 a month to start

    Covelight estimate · likely $3,700–$5,550

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record
    • Dementia: on the state record
    • Hospice: on the state record
  • Map

    Sacramento · 0.3 mi

    Southern End Care Home

    Small home · licensed for 6

    Estimated starting rate

    $4,600 a month to start

    Covelight estimate · likely $3,750–$5,700

    On the state record

    • Hospice: on the state record
  • Map

    Sacramento · 0.6 mi

    Comfort Acres

    Small home · licensed for 6

    Estimated starting rate

    $4,700 a month to start

    Covelight estimate · likely $3,850–$5,800

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record
    • Dementia: on the state record
    • Hospice: on the state record
    • Bedridden: on the state record
  • Map

    Sacramento · 0.9 mi

    Jazba Care Tuolumne

    Small home · licensed for 6

    Estimated starting rate

    $4,450 a month to start

    Covelight estimate · likely $3,650–$5,500

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record
    • Dementia: on the state record
    • Hospice: on the state record
  • Map

    Sacramento · 1.2 mi

    Villa Amore Senior Care

    Small home · licensed for 6

    Estimated starting rate

    $4,600 a month to start

    Covelight estimate · likely $3,750–$5,700

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record
    • Dementia: on the state record
    • Hospice: on the state record

Street maps © Protomaps · © OpenStreetMap

Explore Sacramento County ↗

Do you run this home?

Add your photos, care details, and contact information. Your public profile is free.

Claim this home
Visiting in person? Print a visit sheetHow we source information
CallAsk this home
GH

Call Golden Heritage Senior Care

Sacramento · Licensed for 6

(916) 631-0694

From the state licensing record · October 26, 2026

or

Let us do the legwork

  • We ask about availability, price and the care you describe.
  • If it’s a fit, you choose whether they call you. Either way, you get every answer.
Check availabilityFree

Ask Golden Heritage Senior Care

Check availability

Request a tour

More days
  • AskThe cost, or your own question

Free for families. A home gets your number only if you say yes.

Covelight Care

A free directory of every licensed care home in California, built from CDSS public records.

Find your next step

Find a homeSaved homesHelp me chooseCheck a home

Make sense of care

Care guidesMedi-Cal & careYour rightsHow we workAbout this site

Work with Covelight

For professionalsFor home operatorsSuggest a correctionDevelopersContact us

© 2026 Covelight Care LLC. Homes never pay to appear or rank higher.

Covelight Care is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the sources named on this page.

3104 O St Unit #1023, Sacramento, CA 95816

PrivacyTermsText messages