Illustration — no photo of this home on file yet

Golden Heritage Senior Care II

Small home·Licensed for 6·Sacramento, California

Licensed since 2024Licence #342701257
  • Care approvals on fileWheelchair · HospiceState licensing record · September 27, 2026
  • Estimated starting rate$4,500 a monthCovelight estimate · likely $3,650–$5,500
  • Home sizeLicensed for 6Small care home · a licensed care home (RCFE)
  • Room at the last state visit6 of 6 beds occupiedJuly 17, 2026 · not a current opening
  • Ways to payAsk the homeMedi-Cal ALW participation not on file
  • Last state visitJuly 17, 2026CDSS inspection record
  • Licence holderGolden Heritage Senior Care LLCSince 2024 · 3 licensed homes

Golden Heritage Senior Care II is a small care home in Sacramento — a licensed residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE), the licence category behind “assisted living” and “board and care.” It is licensed for 6 residents since 2024. Dementia care and bedridden care are not on file.

Built from CDSS public records · September 27, 2026. Every fact below names its source and date.

Quick answers and the state record

A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

Quick answers about Golden Heritage Senior Care II

Is Golden Heritage Senior Care II licensed?

The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

How many residents is Golden Heritage Senior Care II licensed for?

6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Has Golden Heritage Senior Care II been cited?

0 Type A and 0 Type B citations since 2024, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. Those records count 11 state visits over the same years.

Is Golden Heritage Senior Care II still open?

This license was on the CDSS roster as of September 28, 2026.

What does Golden Heritage Senior Care II cost?

$4,500 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $3,650–$5,500. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 11 small homes and similar homes within 3 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

Among 19 other homes of a similar licensed size in Sacramento that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $3,046 to $4,461 a month, and the middle figure is $3,500 (n = 19 other homes publishing a starting rate).

Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.

A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.

The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.

A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.

Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.

Does Golden Heritage Senior Care II take Medi-Cal?

On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.

Who holds the license?

The license is held by Golden Heritage Senior Care LLC, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. See the homes licensed to Golden Heritage Senior Care LLC — at least 3 on the state roster.

Is there a hospital nearby?

Kaiser Foundation Hospital - Sacramento is 2 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.

Can Golden Heritage Senior Care II keep a resident on hospice?

Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 2 residents, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Golden Heritage Senior Care II license and inspection record

  • Name on the license: “GOLDEN HERITAGE SENIOR CARE II”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
  • License #342701257. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • Licensed for 6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • Licensed to Golden Heritage Senior Care LLC, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • First licensed in 2024, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • 11 state inspection visits since 2024, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • 0 Type A and 0 Type B citations on file since 2024, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. The same records count 11 state visits in that period.
  • 2 complaints and 0 substantiated allegations on file since 2024, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
  • The most recent state visit on file is July 17, 2026, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
Type A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗

See the state’s own record

Can they support the care needed?

California licenses a home for specific kinds of care. The state’s record lists what this home is approved for; the home’s own answers fill in what changes as needs change.

  • Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved · covers up to 6 residents
  • Dementia / memory careNot on file · ask the home
  • Hospice careApproved · covers up to 2 residents
  • BedriddenNot on file · ask the home

State licensing record · September 27, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.

Read the state’s own wording
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. SIX NON-AMBULATORY. BEDROOMS 1,2,3, AND 6 APPROVED FOR NON-AMBULATORY. BEDROOM 5 APPROVED FOR STAFF ONLY. WAIVER/GRANTED FOR HOSPICE CARE FOR TWO.

935 - ELDERLY

CDSS record, verbatim · September 27, 2026

As needs change

  • Staying through hospice

    Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 2 — care may continue at the end of life

    Ask: “If hospice is needed, can care continue here until the end?”

    State licensing record · September 27, 2026

4 more questions to ask the home
  • Two-person transfers or a lift

    Not on file

    Ask: “If two people or a lift are needed to transfer, can the person stay?”

  • Someone awake overnight

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?”

  • Medicines

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who manages the medicines, and what happens when a dose is missed?”

  • If memory loss develops

    Dementia-care designation not on file

    Ask: “If memory loss develops, what would change — and when would a move be needed?”

What it costs here

Covelight estimate

$4,500a month to start

Likely $3,650–$5,500

From 11 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file

Likely monthly total

$4,500a month

Likely $3,650–$5,700

With a shared room and basic help.

An estimate for planning, not a quote. The price is made in the phone call.

See the full cost breakdownRoom, care and fees · how people pay · how this estimate works
Room
Daily care
Sharing the room

Memory care is not priced here: a dementia-care designation is not on file for this home. Ask the home.

  • Starting monthly rate$4,500likely $3,650–$5,500

    Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 11 small homes and similar homes within 3 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

  • Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600

    Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (45 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).

  • One-time move-in fee$2,000one time · likely $0–$4,000

    Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,000 (134 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.

Likely monthly totalLikely $3,650–$5,700
$4,500
First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $4,300–$8,850
$6,500
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
  • Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
  • Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
  • SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
  • VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
  • Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
  • MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
If the money runs out, what Medi-Cal covers
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
  • The care level

    Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.

  • What is billed separately

    Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.

  • Move-in costs

    A one-time community fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.

  • Increases

    California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.

  • What is the full monthly cost for the room and care we need, and what does it include?
  • What would the next care level cost, and who decides when it changes?
  • What is billed separately, and is there a one-time fee or deposit at move-in?
  • Is any private-pay period required before another payment program can begin?
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 11 small homes and similar homes within 3 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

11 homes like this within 3 miles publish starting rates mostly between $3,250–$5,000.

  • Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
  • Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
  • Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
  • Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
  • We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
  • It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Show the 11 nearby homes behind this estimate

Where it is

  • 3612 Eastern Ave, Sacramento, CA 95821Address from the public record · September 27, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.

Opening the neighborhood map…

The state record

California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. Here are the dated documents and the state’s own words, beside what is typical for homes this size.

Since 2023, the state has filed 11 documents for this home, and its records count 11 visits since 2024. The most recent — a complaint investigation report on July 17, 2026 — closed with the state’s outcome word: “Unsubstantiated.”

On file since
2023
State visits
11
Most recent visit
July 17, 2026
Occupied at that visit
6 of 6 bedsa count on that day, not an opening

We hold 2 complaint reports the state published for this home, dated November 25, 2025 to July 17, 2026. 2 of the 2 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Unsubstantiated” (2). 2 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word. Summary composed by computer from the 2 complaint reports below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

Beside homes the same size

  • Type A citations0typical 0
  • Type B citations0typical 0
  • Substantiated allegations0typical 0
  • Total complaints2typical 0

“Typical” is the statewide median across the 6,808 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this licence since 2024.

Year by year
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated2026220202522020244402023330

The last 36 months — 8 of 11 documents

20262 state visits · 2 documents
Jul 17, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: ) The facility allowed excluded individuals to work in the facility. 2) Staff are forging resident documents. 3) The Administrator is not present at the facility for a sufficient amount of time.

Licensing Program Analysts (LPA) Kevin Gould made an unannounced inspection at Golden Heritage Senior Care II (RCFE) on 7/17/26 at 1:40pm to conclude the investigation of the above allegation and to deliver the findings. LPA Gould met with staff, Temo Rocotabula and together discussed the investigation details. Based on files obtained and reviewed during the investigation process, LPA Gould was unable to corroborate the allegation. LPA reviewed 4 resident files. LPA requested and obtained physician reports (LIC 602) for all 6 residents in care (see confidential name list LIC-811 dated 7/17/26). LPA Gould reviewed reports for each resident. Upon review, the department has no concerns for five of the six physician reports are being altered or fraudulent. The files reviewed appear to be completed by the resident’s physician or an appropriately skilled professional that are able to complete the forms per department regulations. Report Continued on LIC 9099-C Unsubstantiated Additionally, LPA conducted interviews with two staff members and three residents. All staff interviewed denied excluded individuals presence at the facility and had knowledge they are not allowed at any licensed facility. The three residents interviewed denied witnessing any individuals identified in the complaint as being present at the facility or did not recognize photos of the identified individuals. All staff interviewed knows who the administrator is. All three residents interviewed were able to identify who the facility administrator is and identified her most recent working date. All residents interviewed identified the administrator present on a regular basis. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred. The Department has determined that the allegations of Other are unsubstantiated but if any additional information is received this complaint can be amended and the finding can be changed. There are no deficiencies cited per California Code of Regulations, TITLE 22. Exit interview was conducted with facility staff. Appeal Rights were issued, and a copy of this report was left at the facility.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 17, 2026 · control 27-AS-20260211132336
Mar 27, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

On 3/27/26 1:10pm Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kevin Gould arrived at Golden Heritage Senior Care for the purpose of conducting a required 1 year annual inspection. LPA met with Administrator, Yelena Bigelow and together conducted a tour of the home. LPA and Administrator evaluated the physical plant to ensure the health and safety of the residents in care. Areas inspected are including but not limited to the kitchen, resident bedrooms; resident bathrooms, living and dining room and outdoor areas. LPA observed the facility to be free of odor, clean and in good repair. LPA observed that all rooms are equipped with the required furniture and sufficient lighting throughout the facility. LPA observed one pill, pre poured and unsecured in a drawer. LPA provided advisory notes. LPA measured the water temperature, temperature measured at 108 degrees F which meets the 105-120 degree Fahrenheit regulation. LPA observed sufficient seven day non-perishable and two day perishable food supplies. Fire extinguishers and smoke detectors are current and in compliance with fire safety. LPA notes the facility had the required carbon monoxide detectors. First aid kit was checked and is complete. LPA observed centrally stored medications secure from residents. Per California Code of Regulations, Title 22 there were no deficiencies cited during today's inspection. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report was left at the facility.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 27, 2026

The state marks this report as 4 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 2. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.

20252 state visits · 2 documents
Nov 25, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff refused to allow resident readmission to facility.

On 11/25/2025 at 9:00 AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Shakaricka Hughes arrived unannounced to this facility to conduct a complaint visit. LPA met with Facility staff Kinisimere and explained the purpose of the visit. The purpose of this visit is to deliver complaint findings for the allegation above. The current census is 6. Allegation: Staff refused to allow resident readmission to the facility It was alleged that staff refused to allow resident readmission to the facility. This investigation consisted of interviews with facility staff, the reporting party, and records reviewed. On 10/2/2025 LPA Hughes conducted a visit to the facility, interview with facility staff (S1) indicated that resident (R1) was re-admitted back into the facility following a rehabilitation stay at a Skilled Nursing Facility (SNF) from 9/11/2025 to 10/3/2025. Interview with the reporting party (RP) indicated that there was a delay in R1’s re-admission to the facility. However, resident (R1) was provided reassessment by the facility, and was subsequently re-admitted. Continuation 9099-C Unsubstantiated LPA reviewed resident R1’s records and it was reflected that the resident requires increased assistance with ADLs including incontinent care which was provided to the resident through a Home Health agency upon the residents discharge from the SNF into the facility. Upon review of the information provided, there is not enough evidence to corroborate the allegation, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated. The investigation revealed the preponderance of evidence standards have not been met; therefore, the above allegations are found to be UNSUBSTANTIATED. A finding that the complaint allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED means that although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 25, 2025 · control 27-AS-20250925120014
Mar 10, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Holly Williams arrived unannounced to conduct an annual inspection. LPA Williams met with facility administrator Yelena Bigelow and explained the purpose of the visit. . LPA Williams reviewed four resident files (R1-R4) and staff one staff file (S1). LPAs Williams toured the facility with Yelena Bigelow and inspected common areas, the kitchen, bedrooms, bathrooms, garage, and backyard areas. Furniture and furnishings were sufficient to meet the needs of residents. The facility temperature was 73 degrees Fahrenheit, which is within the required range of 68 and 85 degrees. The facility's water temperature measured 107.4 degrees Fahrenheit, which is below the required range of 105 and 120 degrees. LPA Williams observed first aid supplies, a fully-charged and up-to-date fire extinguisher, and carbon monoxide/smoke detectors. LPAs Williams observed a minimum 2-day supply of perishable food and a minimum 7-day supply of nonperishable food. LPA Williams observed a locked cabinet for the storage of medication. LPA Williams observed locked cabinets for the storage of cleaning solutions and knives. LPA Williams interviewed 1 staff member (S1) and 2 residents (R1-R2). Appeal rights and a copy of this report were provided to Yelena Bigelow.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 10, 2025
20244 state visits · 4 documents
May 20, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Post Licensing

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Vincent Moleski arrived unannounced to conduct a postlicensing inspection. LPA Moleski met with facility administrator Yelena Bigelow and explained the purpose of the visit. When LPA Moleski arrived, he was met by a staff member (S1). LPA Moleski reviewed Guardian records and observed that S1 was not associated to this facility. S1 told LPA Moleski S1 had been working at this facility for about two to three months. Bigelow submitted a transfer request and S1 was associated during this visit. S1 showed LPA Moleski a closet containing cleaning solutions and other cleaning supplies. S1 said the lock to the closet had been broken since approximately 11 p.m. the previous night. Bigelow removed the cleaners during this visit. LPA Moleski reviewed five resident files (R1-R5) and one staff file (S1). LPA Moleski toured the facility with Bigelow and inspected common areas, the kitchen, bedrooms, bathrooms, and backyard areas. While inspecting the kitchen, LPA Moleski observed several medications being stored in an unlocked cabinet. LPA Moleski observed first aid supplies, a fully-charged and up-to-date fire extinguisher, and working carbon monoxide/smoke detectors. LPA Moleski observed a minimum 2-day supply of perishable food and a minimum 7-day supply of nonperishable food. LPA Moleski observed a locked cabinet for the storage of medication. LPA Moleski observed a locked box for the storage of knives. LPA Moleski interviewed one staff member (S1) and two residents (R2-R3). This facility is hereby cited per 22 CCR Sections 87309(a), 87465(h)(2), and 87355(e)(3). A civil penalty in the amount of $100 per day worked by S1 for a maximum of five days is hereby assessed. An exit interview was held with Bigelow. Appeal rights and a copy of this report were left with Bigelow.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 20, 2024
Mar 7, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Prelicensing

On March 07, 2024 at 2:20 PM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Avelina Martinez arrived unannounced to conducted a Pre-Licensing Inspection of the facility to ensure compliance with Title 22 regulations. LPA Avelina Martinez met with Penina Tuimaualuga who assisted LPA Martinez in today’s inspection. Facility has a fire clearance for 1 ambulatory resident and 5 non-ambulatory residents. Bedrooms 1, 2, 3, and 6 are permitted for non-ambulatory resident use. Moreover, rooms 4 is not permitted for staff or resident use, and it is only permitted for storage. Rooms 5 is only permitted for staff use. Yelena Bigelow, will be the Administrator of this facility. The facility administrator’s certificate is current, and it expires on February 01, 2025. LPA Martinez inspected the physical plant including but not limited to the kitchen, dining room, resident bedrooms; resident bathrooms, laundry room, activity room, and outside courtyards of the facility to ensure compliance with Title 22 regulations. LPA toured the facility with Penina Tuimaualuga on March 07, 2024. During today's pre-licensing visit, LPA Martinez observed the following items to be in good repair and in compliance : Facility door locks and knobs Wheelchair Ramps Patio tiles Cleanliness of facility Food supply Emergency exit gate/free of debris. Resident files-LIC 602 and Needs and Service Plans- Fire Clearance (no bedridden residents) The applicant has passed the pre-licensing component of the application process. LPA Martinez will notify the Central Application Bureau (CAB) that the pre-licensing has been completed and passed. Component 3 waived due to previous review of component 3. An exit Interview was conducted, and a copy of this report was provided to the facility.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 7, 2024
Jan 25, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Other

Licensing Program Analysts (LPA) Avelina Martinez and Jaime Ivy-Canady arrived at this facility unannounced on 01/25/2023 at 9:00 AM to conduct a case management visit. LPAs met with Yelena Bigelow and Pennina Tuimaualuga and explained the purpose of the visit. The purpose of the visit today, is in response to follow up on plan of corrections for deficiencies cited on January 11, 2024. LPAs toured the facility with Pennina Timaualuga on 01/25/2024. During the tour, LPAs observed the patio tiles continue to be raised off the ground creating a tripping hazard. In addition, room 3 dresser is blocking the closet door, which is making the closet inaccessible. Moreover the front door locks from the outside, and residents are not able to re-enter into the facility without having staff let them back into the facility. LPAs conducted a resident file review, and LPAs obtained copies of resident documents. Pennina Tuimaualuga reported the landlord will be working on repairing the patio tiles. LPAs were informed a contractor would inspect the patio no later than February 02, 2023. LPA Jaimie Ivy-Canady will conduct a plan of correction visit to follow up on deficiency. Pennina Tuimaualuga agrees to email LPA Jaimie Ivy-Canady plan in regards to front door, room 2 and room 6 exit door locks by 01/26/2024 5:00 PM. No deficiencies cited at this time. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report was provided at the end of visit.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 25, 2024
Jan 11, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Prelicensing

On January 11, 2024 at 9:00 AM, Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Avelina Martinez and Jaime Ivey-Canady arrived unannounced to conducted a Pre-Licensing Inspection of the facility to ensure compliance with Title 22 regulations. LPAs Martinez and Ivey-Canady met with Yelena Bigelow, who assisted LPAs in today’s inspection. Facility has a fire clearance for six non- ambulatory residents. Bedrooms 1, 2, 3, and 6 are designated for non-ambulatory resident use only. Bedroom 5 is designated for staff use only. Storage room shall only be used for storage. Facility has an approved hospice waiver for 1. LPS will follow up on Dementia program plan. Administrator, Yelena Bigelow has been the assigned to the facility. The facility administrator’s certificate expires on 02/01/2025. LPAs inspected the interior and the exterior of the facility including the common living spaces, resident bedrooms and bathrooms, and kitchen. LPAs toured both indoor and outdoors of the facility with Yelena Bigelow on 01/11/2024 at 10:00 AM. Physical Plant: Based on inspection of the physical plant, Title 22 regulations are not met according to the following: Facility is not sanitary and in disrepair: Air filter in the main hall is covered in dust, Front screen door is not in good repair, and main door will not close properly if screen door is closed. Blinds in room 1 are broken and in disrepair. Window sill in Room 1 have an accumulation of dead pests and spider webs. Rooms 2 and 6 door to the outside do not lock from the inside, and doors will automatically lock from the outside, which residents will not be able to re-enter their room from the outside. In addition, facility staff did not have keys for room door 2 and room door 6. The toilet in Room 3 is not maintained and clean. The bathroom toilet was not sanitary. Continued... Bedroom 6 is not furnished and is not set up for resident use. Bedroom 3 dresser is blocking the the closet door making the closet inaccessible. Carbon detector located in the hallway was missing a battery and not in good repair. The Administrator inserted batteries, and carbon detector is working properly. The exterior patio tiles are raised and causing a tripping hazard. There are glass windows and furniture next to emergency exit gate. Facility does not have sufficient staff to meet facility needs and care and supervision of residents in care. Facility has resident 1 that is in bed most of the day due to weakness in legs, and has a hoyer hoyer lift. Resident 1 requires stand by assistance at all times, and is a two person assist. Facility assessments also state resident 1 is not able to climb stairs require help with all activities of daily living. The facility has one non-ambulatory resident with a hoyer lift. This pre-licensing is a result of a change of ownership (CHOW). Please see case management report dated 01/11/2024 for deficiencies found during pre-licensing visit. The Administrator agrees to make all repairs by 01/19/2024 by 5:00 PM. The following items will be repaired Clean resident bathrooms Clean Window Sills Repair front window screen door Room 2 and 6 door locks need to be replaced (residents should be allowed to reenter their room from the outside and not be locked out). Remove furniture and debris from exterior back yard (furniture and debris next to fire emergency gate) The pre-licensing process will be completed after staffing issues have been addressed, fire clearance issues (to determine if residents are bedridden. Unknown at this time due to missing LIC 602 physician report) have been addressed, and Administrator hours issues have been addressed. The applicant has not passed the pre-licensing component of the application process. LPAs will notify the Central Application Bureau (CAB) that the pre-licensing has not been completed. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report has been provided to the facility.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 11, 2024
What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedthere was not enough evidence to prove a violation occurred — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe evidence showed the allegation was false, could not have happened, or had no reasonable basisType A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗

An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents and the questions below stand in their place.

Who holds the licence

Golden Heritage Senior Care LLC, licensed since 2024, operates 3 licensed homes in California. Running more than one home is common and is neither good nor bad on its own.

Life here

Rooms, meals, the rhythm of a day, faith and language, pets and house rules — as the home describes them. Tap any detail for its source and date; nothing here is graded.

The home has not described daily life anywhere we have reviewed yet — that is the case for most small homes, and it says nothing about the home. These questions fill in the picture; keep the ones that matter to you.

Before you call

Ask every home the same questions — the state’s record does not answer these. Keep the ones that matter and they travel with your saved homes.

  1. What is included in the monthly rate, and what costs extra?
  2. Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?
  3. Which rooms does the non-ambulatory approval cover, and what transfer support is provided?
  4. What could change whether someone can stay here?
  5. Can we see a bedroom and share a meal during a visit?

Other homes nearby

The nearest licensed homes in Sacramento County, closest first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.

Explore Sacramento County