Illustration — no photo of this home on file yet
- Care approvals on fileWheelchair · Dementia · HospiceState licensing record · September 27, 2026
- Starting rate$3,500 a monthListed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026
- Home sizeLicensed for 6Small care home · a licensed care home (RCFE)
- Room at the last state visit6 of 6 beds occupiedJuly 16, 2026 · not a current opening
- Ways to payAsk the homeMedi-Cal ALW participation not on file
- Last state visitJuly 16, 2026CDSS inspection record
Love and Serenity II is a small care home in Sacramento — a licensed residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE), the licence category behind “assisted living” and “board and care.” It is licensed for 6 residents. Bedridden care is not on file.
Built from CDSS public records · September 27, 2026. Every fact below names its source and date.
Quick answers and the state record
A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.
Quick answers about Love and Serenity II
Is Love and Serenity II licensed?
The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
How many residents is Love and Serenity II licensed for?
6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
Has Love and Serenity II been cited?
9 Type A and 6 Type B citations, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
Is Love and Serenity II still open?
This license was on the CDSS roster as of September 28, 2026.
What does Love and Serenity II cost?
$3,500 a month to start — listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026.
The home lists this starting rate on Seniorly, seen September 9, 2026.
Among 18 other homes of a similar licensed size in Sacramento that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $2,995 to $4,500 a month, and the middle figure is $3,650 (n = 18 other homes publishing a starting rate).
Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.
A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.
The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.
A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.
Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
Does Love and Serenity II take Medi-Cal?
On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
Who holds the license?
The license is held by Love and Serenity LLC, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
Is there a hospital nearby?
UC Davis Rehabilitation Hospital is 3.5 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.
Can Love and Serenity II keep a resident on hospice?
Hospice care is approved on this license, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
Love and Serenity II license and inspection record
- Name on the license: “LOVE AND SERENITY II”, per the CDSS roster as of June 12, 2026.
- License #342700491. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
- Licensed for 6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
- Licensed to Love and Serenity LLC, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
- First licensed: the year is not on file — the roster carries no first-license date for it. Ask: “When did this license start?”
- 40 state inspection visits on file, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
- 9 Type A and 6 Type B citations on file, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
- 8 complaints and 16 substantiated allegations on file, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
- The most recent state visit on file is July 16, 2026, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗
Can they support the care needed?
California licenses a home for specific kinds of care. The state’s record lists what this home is approved for; the home’s own answers fill in what changes as needs change.
- Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved · covers up to 6 residents
- Dementia / memory careApproved by the state
- Hospice careApproved by the state
- BedriddenNot on file · ask the home
State licensing record · September 27, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.
Read the state’s own wording
PROBATION PERIOD 4/4/2022 TO 4/4/2025. LICENSED TO SERVE 6 NON-AMBULATORY RESIDENTS AGES 60 AND ABOVE. HOSPICE WAIVER APPROVED FOR 2.
983 - RCFE / DEMENTIA
CDSS record, verbatim · September 27, 2026
As needs change
- Staying through hospice
Hospice waiver on file — care may continue at the end of life
Ask: “If hospice is needed, can care continue here until the end?”
State licensing record · September 27, 2026
- If memory loss develops
Dementia-care designation on file
Ask: “Can we read the dementia care disclosure and discuss how daily support works?”
State licensing record · September 27, 2026
3 more questions to ask the home
- Two-person transfers or a lift
Not on file
Ask: “If two people or a lift are needed to transfer, can the person stay?”
- Someone awake overnight
Not on file
Ask: “Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?”
- Medicines
Not on file
Ask: “Who manages the medicines, and what happens when a dose is missed?”
Care & day-to-day support
These are the home’s own statements about its day-to-day practice — they are not part of the state licensing record, and the state has not approved or reviewed them.
Respite / short-term stays
Reported on seniorly.com · source dated August 24, 2026.
Help with bathing or showering
Reported on seniorly.com · source dated August 24, 2026.
Assistance with transfers
Reported on seniorly.com · source dated August 24, 2026.
Medication management
Reported on seniorly.com · source dated August 24, 2026.
Diabetic / carbohydrate-controlled diet
Reported on seniorly.com · source dated August 24, 2026.
Incontinence care
Reported on seniorly.com · source dated August 24, 2026.
Help with dressing and grooming
Reported on seniorly.com · source dated August 24, 2026.
Building is wheelchair accessible
Reported on seniorly.com · source dated August 24, 2026.
Diabetes care
Reported on seniorly.com · source dated August 24, 2026.
Nights & staffing
24-hour supervision claimed
Reported on seniorly.com · source dated August 24, 2026.
Emergency call system
Reported on seniorly.com · source dated August 24, 2026.
What it costs here
This home’s starting rate
$3,500a month to start
Listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026 · See listing
Likely monthly total
$3,500a month
Likely $3,500–$4,100
With a shared room and basic help.
An estimate for planning, not a quote. The price is made in the phone call.
See the full cost breakdownRoom, care and fees · how people pay · where the price comes from
Starting monthly rate$3,500this home
The home lists this starting rate on Seniorly, seen September 9, 2026.
Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600
Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (45 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).
One-time move-in fee$2,000one time · likely $0–$4,000
Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,000 (134 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.
- Likely monthly totalLikely $3,500–$4,100
- $3,500
- First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $3,500–$7,600
- $5,500
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
- Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
- Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
- SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
- VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
- Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
- MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
- The care level
Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.
- What is billed separately
Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.
- Move-in costs
A one-time community fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.
- Increases
California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.
- What is the full monthly cost for the room and care we need, and what does it include?
- What would the next care level cost, and who decides when it changes?
- What is billed separately, and is there a one-time fee or deposit at move-in?
- Is any private-pay period required before another payment program can begin?
How this estimate worksWhere this price comes from
The home lists this starting rate on Seniorly, seen September 9, 2026.
17 homes like this within 10 miles publish starting rates mostly between $2,700–$5,300.
- Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
- Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
- Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
- Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
- We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
- It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Show the 17 nearby homes behind this estimate
- Alaturi CareSacramento · 1.3 mi · Small home$5,000Listed on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026
- Greenhaven Place Independent Lvg and Assisted LvgSacramento · 2.0 mi · Mid-size home$2,995Listed on Seniorly · independent living one bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Acc Assisted Living at Greenhaven TerraceSacramento · 2.0 mi · Mid-size home$2,800Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- The Meadows at Country PlaceSacramento · 2.1 mi · Mid-size home$6,600Listed on Seniorly · assisted living studio · seen September 9, 2026
- Ivy Ridge Assisted LivingSacramento · 3.3 mi · Mid-size home$2,600Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Maria Teresa Home CareSacramento · 6.0 mi · Small home$2,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Siebenthal Care HomeSacramento · 7.2 mi · Small home$3,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Immaculate Care HomeElk Grove · 7.5 mi · Small home$3,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Yellow OrchidElk Grove · 7.6 mi · Small home$3,500Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Twin Rivers at NatomasSacramento · 7.8 mi · Mid-size home$2,750Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Marconi VillaSacramento · 8.3 mi · Small home$5,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
- Courtyard TerraceSacramento · 8.5 mi · Mid-size home$4,345Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Gene-Lyn Guest HomeSacramento · 8.7 mi · Small home$4,500Listed on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026
- Sunny Beach VillaSacramento · 8.9 mi · Small home$3,200Listed on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026
- Spring View Gardens Care HomeElk Grove · 9.2 mi · Small home$3,000Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Comforts of Home GavirateElk Grove · 9.3 mi · Small home$4,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living studio · seen September 9, 2026
- Eastern ManorSacramento · 10.0 mi · Mid-size home$3,800Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
Where it is
- 5942 Park Village St, Sacramento, CA 95822Address from the public record · September 27, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.
Opening the neighborhood map…
The state record
California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. Here are the dated documents and the state’s own words, beside what is typical for homes this size.
Since 2021, the state has filed 38 documents for this home, and its records count 40 visits. The most recent — a complaint investigation report on July 16, 2026 — closed with the state’s outcome word: “Unsubstantiated.”
- On file since
- 2021
- State visits
- 40
- Most recent visit
- July 16, 2026
- Occupied at that visit
- 6 of 6 bedsa count on that day, not an opening
We hold 11 complaint reports the state published for this home, dated September 2, 2021 to July 16, 2026. 11 of the 11 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (6), “Unfounded” (1), “Unsubstantiated” (4). 11 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word. Summary composed by computer from the 11 complaint reports below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.
Beside homes the same size
- Type A citations9typical 0
- Type B citations6typical 0
- Substantiated allegations16typical 0
- Total complaints8typical 0
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 6,808 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations.
Year by year
The last 36 months — 12 of 38 documents
Jul 16, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff are forging resident documents.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Avelina Martinez arrived at the facility unannounced on July 16, 2026, at 11:03 AM to deliver complaint findings, LPA Martinez met with Luisa Biu and explained the purpose of the visit. Throughout the course of the investigation, LPA Martinez conducted interviews, reviewed facility files, and conducted facility inspections. Based on a file review, LPA Martinez observed that five out five LIC 602 Physician's Report For Community Care Facilities (LIC602) documents contained physician signatures. In addition, the five LIC602 documents were maintained and completed. As a result, there were no discrepancies observed on the five LIC602 documents. Due to the above noted information, although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, and therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report was provided to the facility. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 16, 2026 · control 27-AS-20260211094606
Jul 1, 2026Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated
Allegation investigated: The Administrator is not present at the facility for a sufficient amount of time.
Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Avelina Martinez and Sulma Lopez arrived at the facility unannounced on July 01, 2026, at 9:30 AM to deliver complaint findings, LPAs met with Luisa Biu and explained the purpose of the visit. Throughout the course of the investigation, LPA Martinez conducted interviews and reviewed facility files. Based on interviews and facility inspections conducted during this investigation, it was learned that the Administrator does visit the facility weekly. LPA Martinez visited the facility Feburary 20, 2026, June 05, 2026, and July 01, 2026. During these visit, the Administrator was not present. In addition, during an interview, LPA Martinez asked interviewee 1 (I1) how many times has the administrator visited the facility since thier last inspection visit on June 06, 2026? I1 reported zero times. Continued... Substantiated As a result of this investigation, the Department finds this allegation to be Substantiated. A finding that the complaint is substantiated means that the allegation is valid because the preponderance of the evidence standard has been met. Deficiency cited on the LIC 9099-D page, per Title 22 Regulations. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this LIC 9099 report, LIC 9099-D page, and LIC appeal rights document were provided to the facility.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 1, 2026 · control 27-AS-20260211094606
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87405(a) · Plan of correction due date: Jul 15, 2026
87405(a) Administrator Qualifications and Duties: ...The administrator...shall be on the premises a sufficient number of hours to permit adequate attention to the management and administration of the facility... This requirement was not met as evidence by: based on observation and record review, the Licensee did not ensure the Administrator was present at the facility the sufficient amount of hours to manage the facility. This posed a potential health and safety risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 1, 2026
Plan of correction: The facility administrator shall be present at the facility 40 hours per week starting July 02, 2026, and LIC 500 Personnel Report with updated hours shall be emailed to LPA Maritinez by POC date July 15, 2026.
The state marks this report as 5 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 4. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.
Jul 1, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Deficiencies
Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Avelina Martinez and Sulma Lopez arrived at this facility unannounced on July 01, 2026, at 9:30 AM to conduct a case management visit. LPAs met with Luisa Biu and explained the purpose of the case management visit. The purpose of the visit today, is in response to learned Incidental medical and dental and basic services deficiencies. Based on four out of five interviews it was indicated that there is one non-awake staff during the night shift. Resident 2 (R2) reported during one night incident, they required a brief change. R2 reported they had to scream for assistance, however, the night staff on duty did not respond. R2 reported they had to wear a soiled brief until a family member arrived at the facility the next day in the morning. Resident 3 (R3) reported that resident 4 (R4) fell while they were in the restroom at night. R4 was yelling for assistance, however the staff on duty did not respond to R4's yelling. R3 reported the staff on duty was not awake at the time of the incident. Resident 1 (R1) and resident 5 (R5) both reported that the night staff is not awake, and they have to yell from their bedroom when they need care and assistance. Both R1 and R5 reported that night staff does not respond to them when they yell for help and care assistance. LPA Lopez conducted a medication administration record (MAR) review for R1. R1's MAR was missing the following medication entries: Budesonide Formoterol 80 inhaler entry, Doxycycline Hyclate 100 MG, and Benzonatate 200 MG Capsul. It is unknown if facility staff have been administering these medications. It was also learned that the facility does not have prescription orders or discontinuation orders for these medications. Continued... R4 has medication prescription orders for the following medication: Carboxymethylellulose 0.5%, brimodine 0.2%, dorzolamide 2 %, Latanoprost 0.005%, Pantoprazole 40 MG EC Tab, Sulfamenthoxazole 400MG/80MG Tab. However, the facility does not have a supply of the medications. The medication orders are a result of a June 02, 2026 medical appointment. R4 has a prescription order Budesonide/Formoterol 160 mcg, and the facility has a supply of the medication. However, the medication is not listed on R4's MAR, and it is unknown if R4 is being administered the medication. It was also learned that R4's Prednisone 5MG is not being administered as ordered. The Prednisone medication bottle states,"Take 5 tablets by mouth once a day., start taking 25 MG daily on August 05, 2025, decrease dose by 5 MG every week." The pill supply started at 105 tablets and as of July 01, 2026, there are 54 pills left. As a result, facility staff are not administering the medication as ordered. As a result, of this visit, the following deficiencies were cited per Title 22 Regulations: 87464(f)(1) Basic Services Basic services and 87465(a)(4) Incidental Medical and Dental. The deficiencies can be found on the 809-D Page. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of the 809 Report, 809-D Page, and Appeals Rights document were provided to the facility.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 1, 2026
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87464(f)(1) · Plan of correction due date: Jul 2, 2026
87464(f)(1) Basic Services Basic services shall at a minimum include:Care and supervision as defined in Section 87101(c)(3) and Health and Safety Code section 1569.2(c). This requirement was not met as evidence by: Based on interviews and file reviews, the Licensee did not ensure residents needs were being met during the night shift. This posed an immediate health and safety risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 1, 2026
Plan of correction: Facility staff agrees to email signal system and awake night schedule plan by 07/02/2026. Facility staff agrees to implement a signall system, and to have an awake staff that can meet the residents' needs at night. Facility staff agrees to email LIC 500 Personnel Report and singal system purchase receipt and pictures of installed signal system. By July 14, 2026 5:00 PM.
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR87465(a)(4) · Plan of correction due date: Jul 14, 2026
87465(a)(4) Incidental Medical and Dental Care: A plan for incidental medical and dental care shall be developed by each facility...The licensee shall assist residents with self administered medications as needed. This requirement was not met as evidence by: based on file review and interviews, the licensee did not ensure facility staff were assisting R4 with their medication management and administration.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 1, 2026
Plan of correction: Facility staff agrees to conducted a medication audit by my a medical professional by POC date July 14, 2026. Medication audit documentation shall be emailed to LPA Martinez by POC date July 14, 2026 by 5:00 PM.
Jan 23, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
On 1/23/26 at 9:00am Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kevin Gould arrived at Love and Serenity II for the purpose of conducting a required 1 year annual inspection. LPA met with Administrator, Unaisi Waqalala and together conducted a tour of the home. LPA and Administrator evaluated the physical plant to ensure the health and safety of the residents in care. Areas inspected are including but not limited to the kitchen, resident bedrooms; resident bathrooms, living and dining room and outdoor areas. LPA observed the facility to be free of odor and clean. LPA observed that all rooms are equipped with the required furniture and sufficient lighting throughout the facility. LPA observed the dress in one bedroom has broken drawers and is in need of repair/replacement. LPA measured the water temperature, temperature measured at 112 degrees F which meets the 105-120 degree Fahrenheit regulation. LPA observed sufficient two day perishable food supplies LPA inspected non-parishable food supply and dry goods and observed several items that are expired. Fire extinguishers and smoke detectors are current and in compliance with fire safety. LPA notes the facility had the required carbon monoxide detectors. First aid kit was checked and is complete. LPA observed centrally stored medication area. LPA observed medications in the fridge in an unlocked box. LPA reviewed Medications and medication administration records. LPA observed several deficiencies in medication administration including, missed medications because the facility ran out of medications and had no refills, no documented medication training and competency examination. LPA observed medications still present that were prescribed in 2024 and have expired. LPA observed medications with altered labels that were not altered by a the pharmacy. Per California Code of Regulations, Title 22 the following deficiencies are cited during today's inspection. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report and appeal rights were left at the facility.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 23, 2026
Aug 28, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Other
On 8/28/25 at 11:00am, Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Kevin Gould and Cynthia Tamayo conducted an unannounced Case management inspection at Love and Serenity II RCFE to deliver an immediate exclusion for a staff member associated to this facility. LPAs met with staff member Merelisoni Mataitoga to discuss the purpose of our visit. LPAs served the facility an immediate exclusion order for staff member R1 (See confidential names list, LIC 811 dated 8/28/25. LPAs obtained a current staff roster dated 7/16/25 to verify R1 is not currently on the schedule. Per staff statements the individual no longer works at the facility. Please removed the individual from being associated with this facility. Per California code of Regulations, Title 22, no deficiencies are observed or cited during today's inspection. Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report were left at the facility.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 28, 2025
May 28, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Unlawful Eviction
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kevin Gould made an unannounced inspection to Love and Serenity II RCFE on 5/28/25 at 2:00pm to conclude the investigation of the above allegations and to deliver the findings. LPA Gould met with staff, Merelisoni Mataitoga and together discussed the investigation details. Based on LPA observations during the investigation process and statements obtained during the investigation process, LPA Gould was unable to corroborate the allegations. The RP did not have direct contact with (R1) and had no direct knowledge of R1 being evicted from the facility. Staff interviewed provided statements that R1 did not want to live at this facility and was under the impression she would be placed in a skilled nursing environment. Both staff interviewed provided statements that R1 asked to be sent to the hospital and informed paramedics not to tell the facility which hospital and she did not want to return. This information was corroborated by the placement agent for R1 who provided statements to LPA that R1 did not want to live at the facility and was not aware of any eviction by the facility. All staff interviewed denied the allegation. Report continued on LIC 9099-C Unsubstantiated Additionally, the placement agent, facility staff and RP have no current knowledge of R1's whereabouts. LPA could not conduct an interview with R1. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred. The Department has determined that the allegations of Eviction/Discharge are unsubstantiated but if any additional information is received this complaint can be amended and the finding can be changed. There are no deficiencies is cited per California Code of Regulations, TITLE 22. Exit interview was conducted with facility staff. Appeal Rights were issued, and a copy of this report was left at the facility.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 28, 2025 · control 27-AS-20250411121517
May 28, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff did not properly store resident's medication Hazards were made available to residents in care Staff did not ensure sufficient healthy food items were made available at the facility for residents in care Staff did not provide adequate activities to residents in care Facility is in disrepair
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kevin Gould made an unannounced inspection to Love and Serenity II RCFE on 5/28/25 at 9:00am to conclude the investigation of the above allegations and to deliver the findings. LPA Gould met with staff, Merelisoni Mataitoga and together discussed the investigation details. Based on LPA observations during the investigation process and statements obtained during the investigation process, LPA Gould was unable to corroborate the allegations. Both LPAs Lee and Gould observed medications being stored inaccessible to residents in care and were not stored with other items or chemicals that would pose a hazard to residents in care. LPAs also observed all cleaning supplies locked and inaccessible to residents in care. LPA did not observe any hazards accessible to residents in care. LPAs Lee and Gould observed an adequate supply of health and fresh foods available to residents. Three residents interviewed provided statements that the food quality is good and there is plenty of food and snacks available. Report Continued on LIC 9099-C. Unsubstantiated LPA reviewed resident files and medication administration records. LPA observed one resident (R1's) file was incomplete and did not include all required documents. LPA did not observe an admission agreement, emergency information, personal rights forms, needs and services plan or consent forms in R1's file. LPA only observed a physicians report and pre-placement appraisal in R1's file. Additionally, LPA observed errors in documentation of medication administration for multiple residents. LPA observed some medications had not been marked as administered or were marked as given daily when only administered once per week. The Department has determined, based on the preponderance of the evidence obtained during this investigation, that the allegations of records keeping and physical pant are substantiated. The following deficiency is cited per California Code of Regulations, TITLE 22. Exit interview was conducted with facility staff. Appeal Rights were issued, and a copy of this report was left at the home. The Department has investigated the complaint alleging Physical plant. Based on the investigative interviews, record reviews and other supportive evidence, the complaint is determined to be unfounded, meaning that the allegation was false, could not have happened and/or is without a reasonable basis. The Complaint has been dismissed. There are no deficiencies cited per California Code of Regulations, TITLE 22. Exit interview was conducted with facility staff and a copy of this report was left at the facility. LPAs did not observe the facility in disrepair and LPAs observed a variety of activities available to residents. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred. The Department has determined that the allegations of physical plant, food services and other are unsubstantiated but if any additional information is received this complaint can be amended and the finding can be changed. There are no deficiencies is cited per California Code of Regulations, TITLE 22. Exit interview was conducted with facility staff. Appeal Rights were issued, and a copy of this report was left at the facility.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 28, 2025 · control 27-AS-20250313142540
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87307(d)(6) · Plan of correction due date: May 29, 2025
Personal Accommodations and Services: ll outdoor and indoor passageways and stairways shall be kept free of obstruction. This requirement was not met as evidenced by LPA observations the gate latch is on the exterior of the gate and could not easily be opened as a string that attached to the lock is no longer accessible inside the gate. LPA also observed the pavers below the gate are obstructing opening the emergency exit gate which poses an immediate health, safety or personal rights risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 28, 2025
Plan of correction: facility has agreed to ensure the gate can be easily opened from inside the back yard and will ensure the gate can be easily opened and not obstructed by paver below. POC due date is 5/29/25.
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87465(a)(1) · Plan of correction due date: May 29, 2025
Incidental Medical and Dental Care: The licensee shall arrange, or assist in arranging, for medical and dental care appropriate to the conditions and needs of residents. This requirement was not met as evidenced by LPA review of medication administration records indicates errors in documentation as some medications were not documented as being administered and other resident's medications that are given once a week are being documented as being administered daily which poses an immediate health, safety or personal rights risks to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 28, 2025
Plan of correction: Facility has agreed to retraining for all staff members who assist residents with medications. Documentation of training and training materials used will be sent to the department by the POC due date of 5/29/25.
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87506(a) · Plan of correction due date: Jun 6, 2025
Resident Records: The licensee shall ensure that a separate, complete, and current record is maintained for each resident in the facility or in a central administrative location readily available to facility staff and to licensing agency staff. This requirement was not met as evidence by LPA review of resident records where LPA observed R1 did not have a complete file including admission agreement, consent forms and needs and services plan which poses a potential health, safety and personal rights risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 28, 2025
Plan of correction: Facility has agreed to provide a written plan of correction with the specific steps the administrator will take to ensure all resident files are complete, signed and present at the facility at all times. POC due date is 6/6/25.
May 28, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Deficiencies
On 5/28/25 at 1:00pm, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kevin Gould conducted an unannounced case management inspection to address deficiencies observed during an unrelated complaint investigation. LPA reviewed resident medications and medication administration records for all residents. LPA observed two residents (R1 and R2) had each run out of one medication and there were no refills of the medications available at the facility. LPA also observed the staff member present had marked the medications as administered to each resident. Per staff statements the medications have been ordered but have not yet arrived at the facility. Per California Code of Regulations, Title 22, the following deficiency is cited. Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report and appeal rights were left at the facility.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 28, 2025
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87465(c)(2) · Plan of correction due date: May 29, 2025
Incidental Medical and Dental Care: Once ordered by the physician the medication is given according to the physician's directions. This requirement was not met as evidenced by LPA observations and staff statements that two residents each ran out of one medication and were not administered to each resident as the refills have not arrived and the resident's missed a medication dose although it was marked as adminsitered which poses an immediate health, safety or personal rights risk to resdients in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 28, 2025
Plan of correction: Facility has agreed to develop a medication refill calendar or notebook where staff members and the administrator can intake medications and identify a refill date to ensure medications do not run out and are given to residents according to physician instructions. A copy or written plan of the medication refill calendar or notebook will be provided to LPA by the POC due date of 5/29/25.
Feb 3, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
On 1/3/25 at 12:50pm Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kevin Gould arrived at Love and Serenity II for the purpose of conducting a required 1 year annual inspection. LPA met with staff, Mere Racule and together conducted a tour of the home. LPA and staff evaluated the physical plant to ensure the health and safety of the residents in care. Areas inspected are including but not limited to the kitchen, resident bedrooms; resident bathrooms, living and dining room and outdoor areas. LPA observed the facility to be free of odor, clean and in good repair. LPA observed that all rooms are equipped with the required furniture. LPA did observe several rooms in the home to have lighting that was not functioning as designed including the laundry room, resident bathroom, bedroom and hallway lights. LPA measured the water temperature, temperature measured at 118 degrees F which meets the 105-120 degree Fahrenheit regulation. LPA observed sufficient seven day non-perishable and two day perishable food supplies. Fire extinguishers and smoke detectors are current and in compliance with fire safety. LPA notes the facility had the required carbon monoxide detectors. First aid kit was checked and is complete. LPA observed centrally stored medications secure from residents. LPA reviewed staff and resident files. LPA observed one staff member present did not have a completed health screening report or TB clearance. LPA observed the training records to be incomplete and the training materials do not meet requirements in terms of care of persons with dementia as the training did not consist of enough training hours to meet regulations. Per California Code of Regulations, Title 22 the following deficiencies are cited during today's inspection. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report and appeal rights were left at the facility.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 3, 2025
Nov 22, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Other
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kevin Gould conducted an unannounced case management visit on 11/22/2024. This visit is to confirm ORDERS TO INDIVIDUAL FOR IMMEDIATE EXCLUSION FROM ALL FACILITIES. LPA met with caregiver Temo Okomatebula and stated the purpose of visit. Facility understands this is an Immediate Exclusion effective 11/21/2024 and S1 is excluded and cannot be allowed to work, live in, and/or have contact with clients in any residential facility licensed by the California Department of Social Services. Therefore, the Department orders the facility to remove S1 from any contact with clients and not allow this employee to be physically present in the facility. Exit interview conducted, a copy of this report provided on this date. A signature on these forms acknowledges receipt of these forms.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 22, 2024
May 8, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff do not prevent smoking marijuana on the facility grounds
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kevin Gould conducted an unannounced complaint inspection at Love and Serenity II RCFE on 5/8/24 at 8:30am to inform the licensee of complaint allegation mentioned above. During this investigation LPA Gould interviewed S1 and R1 (See confidential name list LIC-811 dated 5/8/24).Based on the interviews and statements obtained during the investigation process, the allegations are substantiated because S1 admitted to LPA that a personal visitor of S1 visitor staff at the facility and the visitor smoked marijuana outside the facility. The Department has determined, based on the preponderance of the evidence obtained during this investigation, that the allegation of Personal Rights is substantiated. The following deficiency is cited per California Code of Regulations, TITLE 22. Exit interview was conducted with facility staff. Appeal Rights were issued, and a copy of this report was left at the home. Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 8, 2024 · control 27-AS-20240506102617
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87468.1 · Plan of correction due date: May 13, 2024
Personal Rights of Residents in All Facilities: To be accorded safe, healthful and comfortable accommodations, furnishings and equipment. This requirement was not met as evidenced by statements from S1 that a personal visitor came to the facility and smoked marijuana outside the facility which poses a potential health safety or personal rights risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 8, 2024
Plan of correction: Facility will conduct training for all staff members reminding staff that they are not permitted personal visitors while at work and training that smoking marijuana while at the facility is a violation and could result in exclusion from licensed facilities. documentation of training for all staff to be completed and submitted by the POC due date.
Jan 3, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
On 1/3/24 at 12:30pm Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kevin Gould arrived at Love and serenity II for the purpose of conducting a required 1 year annual inspection. LPA met with Administrator, Lina Tuiloma and together conducted a tour of the home. LPA and Administrator evaluated the physical plant to ensure the health and safety of the residents in care. Areas inspected are including but not limited to the kitchen, resident bedrooms; resident bathrooms, living and dining room and outdoor areas. LPA observed the facility to be free of odor, clean and in good repair. LPA observed that all rooms are equipped with the required furniture and sufficient lighting throughout the facility. LPA measured the water temperature, temperature measured at 106 degrees F which meets the 105-120 degree Fahrenheit regulation. LPA observed sufficient seven day non-perishable and two day perishable food supplies. Fire extinguishers and smoke detectors are current and in compliance with fire safety. LPA notes the facility had the required carbon monoxide detectors. First aid kit was checked and is complete. LPA observed centrally stored medications secure from residents. LPA Requested the following documents for facility file: LIC 308 Designation of Facility Responsibility, LIC 500 personnel report, Current Administrator Certificate and Client Roster Per California Code of Regulations, Title 22 there were no deficiencies cited during today's inspection. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report was left at the facility.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 3, 2024
What the state’s words mean
CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗
Life here
Rooms, meals, the rhythm of a day, faith and language, pets and house rules — as the home describes them. Tap any detail for its source and date; nothing here is graded.
Find a detail about life at this home.
Rooms & the spaces they will use
Private rooms
Reported on seniorly.com · source dated August 24, 2026.
Outdoor spaceOutdoor common space · Garden · Patio · Walking paths
Reported on seniorly.com · source dated August 24, 2026.
Private bathroom
Reported on seniorly.com · source dated August 24, 2026.
Common areasGrill · Dining room · Business room · Arts room · On-site market / Store · Cognitive learning center
Reported on seniorly.com · source dated August 24, 2026.
Room typesPrivate · Shared Rooms
Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.
LaundryDone by staff
Reported on seniorly.com · source dated August 24, 2026.
Rooms come furnished
Reported on seniorly.com · source dated August 24, 2026.
Visitor parking
Reported on seniorly.com · source dated August 24, 2026.
Wifi in resident rooms
Reported on seniorly.com · source dated August 24, 2026.
AmenitiesPiano · Fireplace · Move-in coordination
Reported on seniorly.com · source dated August 24, 2026.
Air conditioning in the room
Reported on seniorly.com · source dated August 24, 2026.
Housekeeping
Reported on seniorly.com · source dated August 24, 2026.
Cable or satellite TV
Reported on seniorly.com · source dated August 24, 2026.
Salon or barber
Reported on seniorly.com · source dated August 24, 2026.
Telephone in the room
Reported on seniorly.com · source dated August 24, 2026.
Meals, preferences & familiar food
All-day or flexible dining
Reported on seniorly.com · source dated August 24, 2026.
Special diets supportedLow / No Sodium
Reported on seniorly.com · source dated August 24, 2026.
Meal timesScheduled meals
Reported on seniorly.com · source dated August 24, 2026.
Texture-modified dietsPureed
Reported on seniorly.com · source dated August 24, 2026.
Meals provided
Reported on seniorly.com · source dated August 24, 2026.
Vegetarian or vegan optionsVegetarian
Reported on seniorly.com · source dated August 24, 2026.
Professional chef
Reported on seniorly.com · source dated August 24, 2026.
Kosher foodKosher style
Reported on seniorly.com · source dated August 24, 2026.
Food allergy management
Reported on seniorly.com · source dated August 24, 2026.
Activities & the rhythm of a day
Activity types offeredVolunteer program · Music programs · Resident band or musicians · Choir / singing club · Current events club · Cooking classes · and 15 more
Volunteer program · Music programs · Resident band or musicians · Choir / singing club · Current events club · Cooking classes · Live dance or theater performances · Holiday parties · Dances · Art classes · Has karaoke · Trivia games · Live well programs · Has birthday parties · Wine tasting · Has cooking club · Walking club · Woodworking shop · Has wii bowling · Has garden club · Movie nights — reported on seniorly.com · source dated August 24, 2026.
Trips outside the home
Reported on seniorly.com · source dated August 24, 2026.
Religious services at the home
Reported on seniorly.com · source dated August 24, 2026.
Religious services off site
Reported on seniorly.com · source dated August 24, 2026.
Faith, culture & language
Languages spoken by caregiversEnglish · Spanish · Tagalog
Reported on seniorly.com · source dated August 24, 2026.
Pets, routines & independence
Residents may bring a pet
Reported on seniorly.com · source dated August 24, 2026.
Pet types allowedDogs · Cats
Reported on seniorly.com · source dated August 24, 2026.
Visiting & staying involved
Transport for shopping and errands
Reported on seniorly.com · source dated August 24, 2026.
Transportation
Reported on seniorly.com · source dated August 24, 2026.
Before you call
Ask every home the same questions — the state’s record does not answer these. Keep the ones that matter and they travel with your saved homes.
- What is included in the monthly rate, and what costs extra?
- Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?
- Which rooms does the non-ambulatory approval cover, and what transfer support is provided?
- What could change whether someone can stay here?
- Can we see a bedroom and share a meal during a visit?
Other homes nearby
The nearest licensed homes in Sacramento County, closest first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.
Land Park Place
Sacramento · Small home · 0.6 mi away
$4,050 a month to start · Covelight estimate
Greenhaven Blissful Home
Sacramento · Small home · 0.9 mi away
$4,250 a month to start · Covelight estimate
Sunny Peace 1
Sacramento · Small home · 0.9 mi away
$4,150 a month to start · Covelight estimate
Ez Care
Sacramento · Small home · 0.9 mi away
$4,300 a month to start · Covelight estimate
All-Heart Senior Care
Sacramento · Small home · 1.0 mi away
$4,850 a month to start · Covelight estimate
The Waterleaf at Land Park
Sacramento · Large community · 1.0 mi away
$4,350 a month to start · Listed by the home