Saint Benedict Care Llc is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Fountain Valley, Orange County, California — state license #306005478, licensed for 6 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 21 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2021, the most recent dated March 20, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

6 homes in view

Saint Benedict Care Llc

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Small home, 6 residents · Fountain Valley, CA · Orange County
LicensedWheelchairHospiceBedriddenMemory care not on file
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #306005478, held since 2019 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
8925 Canary Avenue · Fountain Valley, Orange County
Phone
(949) 290-6006
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 6 residents
Dementia / memory careNot on file — ask the home
Hospice careApproved for 4 residents
Bedridden careApproved for 1 resident

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 6 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 1 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 4.State service designation935 - ELDERLYthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

Since 2021, the state has visited this home 23 times and filed 21 documents. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated March 20, 2026.

Most recent state visit
March 20, 2026
Occupancy at the March 18, 2026 visit
5 of 6 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 10 documents with transcribed findings, dated January 9, 2023 to March 18, 2026. 10 of the 10 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Unfounded” (6), “Unsubstantiated” (4). 10 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 10 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 11 of 21 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20262 state visits · 4 documents
Mar 20, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 18, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility failed to communicate with resident's conservator regarding resident's finances. Facility forged signature on resident's check.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Hanna Gough made an unannounced visit to the facility to conduct an investigation into the above mentioned complaint allegations. LPA was greeted and granted entry by staff. LPA met with Administrator (AD) Uldarico Almiranez and discussed the purpose of the visit. The investigation into the allegations of facility failed to communicate with resident's conservator regarding resident's finances and facility forged signature on resident's check revealed the following: It was alleged that facility staff did not inform Resident #1 (R1) responsible party in regards of a check that R1 received and that facility staff forged R1s signature on the check. LPA reviewed a physicians report for R1 dated October 7, 2022, stating that R1 was diagnosed with Mild Cognitive Impairment and can manage their own cash resources. LPA reviewed an incomplete social security form for R1 dated May 24, 2021, stating that R1 does not have a conservator and that R1 is responsible forthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 18, 2026 · control 22-AS-20231101155257
Mar 18, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Facility is not adhering to resident's dietary needs

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Hanna Gough made an unannounced visit to the facility for the purpose of investigating the above mentioned complaint allegation. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility by staff. LPA met with Administrator (AD) Uldarico Almiranez and discussed the purpose of the visit. The investigation into the allegation facility is not adhering to resident's dietary needs revealed the following: Resident 1 (R1) moved into the facility on September 28, 2018. LPA reviewed records and observed a physician’s report for R1 dated April 4th, 2024, that stated that R1 has no special diet orders. It was also noted on R1s physician’s report that they were unable to feed themselves and were unable to communicate their needs. LPA reviewed R1’s needs and service plan dated January 08, 2022, which notates a need for staff to assist R1 with full Activities of Daily Living (ADLs). Continue on LIC9099C Unfoundedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 18, 2026 · control 22-AS-20241028152659
Mar 18, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20251 state visit · 1 document
Sep 25, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20243 state visits · 5 documents
Jun 17, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: -Staff were inebriated while on duty

On today's date, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Rosie Quiroz conducted an unannounced visit for the purpose of delivering findings to address the allegations listed above. The 10-day visit complaint investigation was conducted on 11/15/2023. On today's date, LPA Quiroz arrived to the facility and was greeted by Caregiver Rhodora Cabrera. LPA Quiroz called Licensee/Administrator (L/AD) Uldarico Almiranez and discussed purpose of today's visit. Regarding the allegation, “Staff were inebriated while on duty,” the investigation revealed the following: LPA Quiroz conducted multiple interviews with residents and staff. Interviews with eight of eight interviewees reported denying ever witnessing staff drinking alcohol on the job. Two of four interviewees consisting of residents reported Resident 1 (R1) has stated they are going to get staff in trouble and would report things that are untrue. Six of eight interviewees reported that R1 can be paranoid, does not follow rules, and tends to forgethe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 17, 2024 · control 22-AS-20231108161451
Jun 17, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: -Facility staff yelled at residents. -Facility staff do not respond timely for assistance. -Facility staff provided alcohol to resident who cannot have alcohol.

On today's date, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Rosie Quiroz conducted an unannounced visit for the purpose of delivering findings to address the allegations listed above for a complaint initiated on 9/19/2023. The 10-day visit complaint investigation visit was conducted by LPA Quiroz on 09/26/2023. On today's date, LPA Quiroz arrived to the facility and was greeted by Caregiver Rhodora Cabrera. LPA Quiroz called Licensee/Administrator (L/AD) Uldarico Almiranez and discussed purpose of today's visit. Regarding the allegation, “Facility staff yelled at residents,” the investigation revealed the following: LPA Quiroz conducted multiple interviews consisting of residents, staff and witnesses. Interviews conducted with eleven of eleven interviewees reported denying ever witnessing staff yelling at residents at this facility. Four of four interviewees consisting of residents reported Resident 1 (R1) would be the one to yell at staff indicating staff employed at the facility are nice to allthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 17, 2024 · control 22-AS-20230919143528
Jun 17, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: -Client was being emotionally abused while in care

On today's date, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Rosie Quiroz conducted an unannounced visit for the purpose of delivering findings to address the allegation listed above for a complaint initiated on 03/17/2023. The 10-day visit complaint investigation visit was conducted by LPA Quiroz on 03/27/2023. On today's date, LPA Quiroz arrived to the facility and was greeted by Caregiver Rhodora Cabrera. LPA Quiroz called Licensee/Administrator (L/AD) Uldarico Almiranez and discussed purpose of today's visit. Regarding the allegation, “Client was being emotionally abused while in care,” the investigation revealed the following: LPA Quiroz conducted multiple interviews consisting of residents, staff and witnesses. Interviews conducted with ten of eleven interviewees reported denying ever witnessing staff emotionally abusing Resident 1 (R1) or any other residents in care. During the course of the investigation, six of eleven interviewees consisting of residents, staff and witness reported Residethe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 17, 2024 · control 22-AS-20230317093401
Apr 23, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 11, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff left residents unsupervised in the facility. Staff did not properly store medications. Staff did not manage residents’ medication properly.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jenifer Tirre conducted an unannounced inspection to deliver findings on a complaint investigation. LPA identified themselves and discussed the purpose of the visit and the elements of the allegations with Caregiver. During course of the investigation, the department interviewed staff, residents, and witnesses as well as reviewed documentation. The investigation conducted revealed the following: On 10/5/2020, it was reported that Staff left residents unsupervised in the facility, staff did not properly store medications and staff did not manage residents medications properly. Based on interviews conducted with staff, four of four staff members stated that facility residents were not left alone in the facility. Four of four staff confirmed that staff member S1 was at facility inside staff room during the time of alleged non-supervision on 10/2/2020. CONTINUED ON 9099C Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 11, 2024 · control 22-AS-20201005102352
20231 state visit · 1 document
Sep 26, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Beside homes the same size
Type A citations2typical 0
Type B citations0typical 0
Substantiated complaints2typical 0
Total complaints10typical 0
State visits on file23typical 6
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 5,773 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2019.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated202624020251102024350202357020221102021230
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$4,000$6,500 /mo
our estimate — Orange County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,000 · statewide low$8,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home isn’t on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →

Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?
How are care plans reviewed when a resident’s needs change?

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (949) 290-6006

Is Saint Benedict Care Llc licensed?

Yes — Saint Benedict Care Llc is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Fountain Valley (Orange County): California license #306005478, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 6 residents. State records list 21 inspection and complaint documents since 2021; the most recent, a facility evaluation report dated March 20, 2026, appears in the inspection record on this page.

Can Saint Benedict Care Llc care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Saint Benedict Care Llc with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory, hospice care, and bedridden; it does not list dementia / memory care. A clearance that is not on file is not a “no” — it may simply be unrecorded, so if your family needs one of these, ask the home directly and confirm its current scope on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordAGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 6 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 1 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 4.

How much does Saint Benedict Care Llc cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Saint Benedict Care Llc's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in Orange County typically runs $5,000–$7,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $4,000–$6,500/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Saint Benedict Care Llc accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Saint Benedict Care Llc is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.

Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

5 of 6 beds occupied (83%) when the state visited on March 18, 2026. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Saint Benedict Care Llc?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 23 state visits and 21 dated documents since 2021 for Saint Benedict Care Llc; 10 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated March 18, 2026, records an allegation the state marked “Unsubstantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

10 transcribed reports on file

2026

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility failed to communicate with resident's conservator regarding resident's finances. Facility forged signature on resident's check.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Hanna Gough made an unannounced visit to the facility to conduct an investigation into the above mentioned complaint allegations. LPA was greeted and granted entry by staff. LPA met with Administrator (AD) Uldarico Almiranez and discussed the purpose of the visit. The investigation into the allegations of facility failed to communicate with resident's conservator regarding resident's finances and facility forged signature on resident's check revealed the following: It was alleged that facility staff did not inform Resident #1 (R1) responsible party in regards of a check that R1 received and that facility staff forged R1s signature on the check. LPA reviewed a physicians report for R1 dated October 7, 2022, stating that R1 was diagnosed with Mild Cognitive Impairment and can manage their own cash resources. LPA reviewed an incomplete social security form for R1 dated May 24, 2021, stating that R1 does not have a conservator and that R1 is responsible forCDSS inspection report, March 18, 2026 · control 22-AS-20231101155257
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedFacility is not adhering to resident's dietary needs
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Hanna Gough made an unannounced visit to the facility for the purpose of investigating the above mentioned complaint allegation. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility by staff. LPA met with Administrator (AD) Uldarico Almiranez and discussed the purpose of the visit. The investigation into the allegation facility is not adhering to resident's dietary needs revealed the following: Resident 1 (R1) moved into the facility on September 28, 2018. LPA reviewed records and observed a physician’s report for R1 dated April 4th, 2024, that stated that R1 has no special diet orders. It was also noted on R1s physician’s report that they were unable to feed themselves and were unable to communicate their needs. LPA reviewed R1’s needs and service plan dated January 08, 2022, which notates a need for staff to assist R1 with full Activities of Daily Living (ADLs). Continue on LIC9099C UnfoundedCDSS inspection report, March 18, 2026 · control 22-AS-20241028152659

2024

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewed-Staff were inebriated while on duty
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On today's date, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Rosie Quiroz conducted an unannounced visit for the purpose of delivering findings to address the allegations listed above. The 10-day visit complaint investigation was conducted on 11/15/2023. On today's date, LPA Quiroz arrived to the facility and was greeted by Caregiver Rhodora Cabrera. LPA Quiroz called Licensee/Administrator (L/AD) Uldarico Almiranez and discussed purpose of today's visit. Regarding the allegation, “Staff were inebriated while on duty,” the investigation revealed the following: LPA Quiroz conducted multiple interviews with residents and staff. Interviews with eight of eight interviewees reported denying ever witnessing staff drinking alcohol on the job. Two of four interviewees consisting of residents reported Resident 1 (R1) has stated they are going to get staff in trouble and would report things that are untrue. Six of eight interviewees reported that R1 can be paranoid, does not follow rules, and tends to forgeCDSS inspection report, June 17, 2024 · control 22-AS-20231108161451
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewed-Facility staff yelled at residents. -Facility staff do not respond timely for assistance. -Facility staff provided alcohol to resident who cannot have alcohol.
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
On today's date, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Rosie Quiroz conducted an unannounced visit for the purpose of delivering findings to address the allegations listed above for a complaint initiated on 9/19/2023. The 10-day visit complaint investigation visit was conducted by LPA Quiroz on 09/26/2023. On today's date, LPA Quiroz arrived to the facility and was greeted by Caregiver Rhodora Cabrera. LPA Quiroz called Licensee/Administrator (L/AD) Uldarico Almiranez and discussed purpose of today's visit. Regarding the allegation, “Facility staff yelled at residents,” the investigation revealed the following: LPA Quiroz conducted multiple interviews consisting of residents, staff and witnesses. Interviews conducted with eleven of eleven interviewees reported denying ever witnessing staff yelling at residents at this facility. Four of four interviewees consisting of residents reported Resident 1 (R1) would be the one to yell at staff indicating staff employed at the facility are nice to allCDSS inspection report, June 17, 2024 · control 22-AS-20230919143528
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewed-Client was being emotionally abused while in care
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On today's date, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Rosie Quiroz conducted an unannounced visit for the purpose of delivering findings to address the allegation listed above for a complaint initiated on 03/17/2023. The 10-day visit complaint investigation visit was conducted by LPA Quiroz on 03/27/2023. On today's date, LPA Quiroz arrived to the facility and was greeted by Caregiver Rhodora Cabrera. LPA Quiroz called Licensee/Administrator (L/AD) Uldarico Almiranez and discussed purpose of today's visit. Regarding the allegation, “Client was being emotionally abused while in care,” the investigation revealed the following: LPA Quiroz conducted multiple interviews consisting of residents, staff and witnesses. Interviews conducted with ten of eleven interviewees reported denying ever witnessing staff emotionally abusing Resident 1 (R1) or any other residents in care. During the course of the investigation, six of eleven interviewees consisting of residents, staff and witness reported ResideCDSS inspection report, June 17, 2024 · control 22-AS-20230317093401
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff left residents unsupervised in the facility. Staff did not properly store medications. Staff did not manage residents’ medication properly.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jenifer Tirre conducted an unannounced inspection to deliver findings on a complaint investigation. LPA identified themselves and discussed the purpose of the visit and the elements of the allegations with Caregiver. During course of the investigation, the department interviewed staff, residents, and witnesses as well as reviewed documentation. The investigation conducted revealed the following: On 10/5/2020, it was reported that Staff left residents unsupervised in the facility, staff did not properly store medications and staff did not manage residents medications properly. Based on interviews conducted with staff, four of four staff members stated that facility residents were not left alone in the facility. Four of four staff confirmed that staff member S1 was at facility inside staff room during the time of alleged non-supervision on 10/2/2020. CONTINUED ON 9099C UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, January 11, 2024 · control 22-AS-20201005102352

2023

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewed-Resident is being financially abused while in care
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
On today's date, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Rosie Quiroz conducted an unannounced visit for the purpose of concluding and delivering findings to address the allegation listed above. The 10 day visit complaint investigation was conducted on 09/07/2022. During the 10 day inspection visit, LPA Quiroz conducted facility inspection tour,conducted interviews with interviewees consisting of staff, residents and other witnesses. LPA Quiroz requested and reviewed the following records but not limited to: Needs and Services Plans, Physician Reports, Admission Agreements and Identification Forms. On today's date, LPA Quiroz arrived to the facility and was greeted, COVID-19 screened and met with Caregiver Kristine Guevarra. Caregiver Kristine Guevarra called Licensee/Administrator (L/AD) Uldarico Almiranez via telephone and LPA Quiroz discussed purpose of today's visit via telephone. During the course of the investigation, LPA Quiroz conducted multiple interviews consisting of residents staffCDSS inspection report, February 1, 2023 · control 22-AS-20220829124546
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewed-Staff not responding to resident's emergency calls. -Staff forged resident's signature on a document.
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
On today's date, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Rosie Quiroz conducted an unannounced visit for the purpose of concluding and delivering findings to address the allegations listed above. The 10 day visit complaint investigation was conducted on 11/21/2022. On today's date, LPA Quiroz arrived to the facility and was greeted, COVID-19 screened and met with Licensee/Administrator Uldarico Almiranez LPA Quiroz discussed purpose of today's visit. During the course of the investigation the following was reviewed for six of six residents residing at the facility: Physician reports, identification forms and needs and services plans. Regarding the allegation “Staff are not responding to resident’s emergency calls,” LPA Quiroz conducted multiple interviews with interviewees consisting of residents, staff and other witnesses. Interviews conducted with nine of ten Interviewees revealed that staff are responding to resident’s emergency calls indicating staff are available to assist resident’s requCDSS inspection report, February 1, 2023 · control 22-AS-20221114115222
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedResident's grooming needs are not being met.
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
On today's date, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Rosie Quiroz conducted an unannounced visit for the purpose of conducting a 10 day visit complaint investigation to address the allegation noted above. LPA Quiroz arrived to the facility and was greeted, COVID-19 screened and met wtih Lead Caregiver 1 (LCG1). (LCG1) called Licensee/Administrator Uldarico Almiranez via facility telephone on speaker phone. LPA Quiroz discussed purpose of today's call with L/AD Almiranez via telephone. During today's visit, LPA Quiroz toured the interior and exterior of the facility. During today's visits, six of six residents appeared groomed with hair combed, dressed weather appropriately and wearing clean clothes. Five of six residents indicated having personal hygiene supplies readily available when needed. Due to cognitive impairment one of six residents was unable to be interviewed regarding this allegation. Personal hygiene supplies, but not limited to shaving cream, razors, body wash, shampoo, toothCDSS inspection report, January 9, 2023 · control 22-AS-20221230121116
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedStaff are impaired from drinking alcohol on the job. Staff stole resident's personal property. Staff hit the resident. Staff do not keep resident information private.
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
On today's date, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Rosie Quiroz conducted an unannounced visit for the purpose of concluding and delivering findings to address the allegations listed above. The 10 day visit complaint investigation was conducted on 10/19/2021. A follow up complaint investigation visit was conducted on 09/07/2022 to conduct interviews with interviewees, review and collect resident records but not limited to physician reports, needs and services plans and identification forms. On today's date, LPA Quiroz arrived to the facility and was greeted, COVID-19 screened and met with Caregiver Kristine Guevarra. Caregiver Kristine Guevarra called Licensee/Administrator Uldarico Almiranez via facility telephone on speaker phone. LPA Quiroz discussed purpose of today's call with L/AD Almiranez via telephone. During the course of the investigation the following was reviewed for Resident 1 (R1), Resident 2, Resident 3, Resident 4: Physician reports, identification forms and needs and seCDSS inspection report, January 9, 2023 · control 22-AS-20211012143927

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 23 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds), computed across all 5,773 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
2
typical for this size: 0
Type B citations
0
typical for this size: 0
Substantiated complaints
2
typical for this size: 0
Total complaints
10
typical for this size: 0
State visits on file
23
typical for this size: 6
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(949) 290-6006
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Saint Benedict Care Llc? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.