At Haven Home Ii is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Merced, Merced County, California — state license #247209199, licensed for 13 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 14 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2022, the most recent dated January 27, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

1 home in view

At Haven Home Ii

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Mid-size home, 13 residents · Merced, CA · Merced County
LicensedWheelchairMemory careHospiceBedridden not on file
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #247209199, held since 2022 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
3763 N Lake Road · Merced, Merced County
Phone
(209) 201-9783
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 13 residents
Dementia / memory careVerified in record
Hospice careApproved for 5 residents
Bedridden careNot on file — ask the home

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. APPROVED FOR 13 NON-AMBULATORY. APPROVED HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 5.State service designations935 - ELDERLY · 983 - RCFE / DEMENTIAthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

“RCFE / Dementia” is the state’s designation for a home with an approved Dementia Care Plan of Operation — it’s recorded separately from the comments above, which is why the memory-care approval may not appear in that text.

Since 2022, the state has visited this home 16 times and filed 14 documents. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated January 27, 2026.

Most recent state visit
January 27, 2026
Occupancy at the July 14, 2022 visit
13 of 13 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 7 documents with transcribed findings, dated April 21, 2022 to April 12, 2025. 7 of the 7 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (5), “Unsubstantiated” (2). 7 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 7 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 7 of 14 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20261 state visit · 1 document
Jan 27, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20252 state visits · 3 documents
Apr 12, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Due to neglect, resident sustained a pressure injury Staff retained resident with a prohibited health condition

On 04/12/25, Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) L. Salazar and M. Vega arrived to the facility unannounced to do deliver findings on the above allegations. LPAs were greeted by house manager, Myra stated the purpose of the visit and were allowed entry. Staff contacted Administrator vis telephone. LPAs met with House manager Myra Torres to discuss the findings of the complaint allegations. During the investigation, LPA Salazar conducted interviews and records review. Records review show Resident R1 had a blister on their heel in September of 2024 and Home Health was ordered. Compassion Home Care Home Health records obtained for the period of 11/08/24 through 01/06/2025 states R1 to have an unstageable presssure injury on their heel and R1 should be transferred to Skilled Nursing for care. Interviews with Administrator and facility staff state facility was not observing or caring for the wound since they were not skilled professional. Based on the information received, the preponderance othe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 12, 2025 · control 24-AS-20241204100214
Apr 12, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 29, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20242 state visits · 3 documents
Dec 5, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Dec 5, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Feb 20, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Beside homes the same size
Type A citations3typical 0
Type B citations5typical 0
Substantiated complaints8typical 0
Total complaints5typical 1
State visits on file16typical 8
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 307 licensed mid-size homes (7–15 beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2022.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated20261102025231202423020232202022474
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$3,500$5,500 /mo
our estimate — Merced County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home isn’t on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →

What dementia training does staff have, and is the area secured?
Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (209) 201-9783

Is At Haven Home Ii licensed?

Yes — At Haven Home Ii is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Merced (Merced County): California license #247209199, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 13 residents. State records list 14 inspection and complaint documents since 2022; the most recent, a facility evaluation report dated January 27, 2026, appears in the inspection record on this page.

Can At Haven Home Ii care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists At Haven Home Ii with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory, dementia / memory care, and hospice care; it does not list bedridden. A clearance that is not on file is not a “no” — it may simply be unrecorded, so if your family needs one of these, ask the home directly and confirm its current scope on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordAGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. APPROVED FOR 13 NON-AMBULATORY. APPROVED HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 5.

How much does At Haven Home Ii cost?

California's public licensing record does not include At Haven Home Ii's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in Merced County typically runs $3,500–$5,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $3,000–$5,000/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does At Haven Home Ii accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

At Haven Home Ii is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.

Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

13 of 13 beds occupied (100%) when the state visited on July 14, 2022. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for At Haven Home Ii?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 16 state visits and 14 dated documents since 2022 for At Haven Home Ii; 7 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated April 12, 2025, records an allegation the state marked “Substantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

7 transcribed reports on file

2025

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedDue to neglect, resident sustained a pressure injury Staff retained resident with a prohibited health condition
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
On 04/12/25, Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) L. Salazar and M. Vega arrived to the facility unannounced to do deliver findings on the above allegations. LPAs were greeted by house manager, Myra stated the purpose of the visit and were allowed entry. Staff contacted Administrator vis telephone. LPAs met with House manager Myra Torres to discuss the findings of the complaint allegations. During the investigation, LPA Salazar conducted interviews and records review. Records review show Resident R1 had a blister on their heel in September of 2024 and Home Health was ordered. Compassion Home Care Home Health records obtained for the period of 11/08/24 through 01/06/2025 states R1 to have an unstageable presssure injury on their heel and R1 should be transferred to Skilled Nursing for care. Interviews with Administrator and facility staff state facility was not observing or caring for the wound since they were not skilled professional. Based on the information received, the preponderance oCDSS inspection report, April 12, 2025 · control 24-AS-20241204100214

2022

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResident sustained an injury while in care.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 7/14/2022 Licensing Program Analyst M. Garza arrived at facility to deliver complaint findings. LPA was temperature screened and allowed entry into the facility by Direct Care Staff, Tinny Daraphet. House Manager, Maria Knight was contacted and arrived some time later. LPA explained reason for visit and completed a Health and Safety check on residents in care. Residents observed in common areas and in rooms. During investigation IB requested and reviewed medical records. Although falls resulting in an injury occured, the faciilty attempted to prevent further falls. Facility did so by installing rails in the bathroom, covered corners of furniture with corner covers, lowering bed and installed side rails. Althought the allegation may have occurred it was not due to a lack of care and supervision. The allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. Exit interview completed and a copy of the report provided. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, July 14, 2022 · control 24-AS-20220502144210
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility in disrepair.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
On 7/14/2022 Licensing Program Analyst M. Garza arrived at facility to deliver complaint findings. LPA was temperature screened and allowed entry into the facility by Direct Care Staff. House Manager, Maria Knight was contacted and arrived some time later. LPA explained reason for visit and completed a Health and Safety check on residents in care. Residents observed in common areas and in rooms. During the investigation RP reported that the telephone service and doorbell at the facility was not working. During visits made by the LPA is was reported by staff, Licensee and House Manager that the house phone has poor reception and does not always work properly. Licensee stated they have contacted the phone company for repair service. LPA observed the ring doorbell to funtion on the outside but the chime was not heard inside the faciilty. LPA was informed by Licensee that they did not have access to the ring doorbell service on their phone and was not given this by the previous Licensee. LCDSS inspection report, July 14, 2022 · control 24-AS-20220502144210
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not assist resident with their medication
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
On 7/14/2022 Licensing Program Analyst M. Garza arrived at facility to deliver complaint findings. LPA was temperature screened and allowed entry into the facility by Direct Care Staff. House Manager, Maria Knight was contacted and arrived some time later. LPA explained reason for visit and completed a Health and Safety check on residents in care. Residents observed in common areas and in rooms. During complaint investigation LPA requested documentation (physicians report, MARS from January through June 2022, staff contact information, staff schedule and hospital discharge paperwork) and completed interviews with staff, house manager, RP and Licensee. Records reviewed showed that the medication was not logged as given/given (2/2022 and 3/2022). House Manager stated "new Licensee took over in February 2022. Medications could not be verified for residents in care due to poor record keeping by the previous Licensee". The allegation is SUBSTANTIATED. Exit inteview completed. Appeal rightsCDSS inspection report, July 14, 2022 · control 24-AS-20220509082643
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not notify resident's responsible party of resident's incident
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 7/14/2022 Licensing Program Analyst M. Garza arrived at facility to deliver complaint findings. LPA was temperature screened and allowed entry into the facility by Direct Care Staff. House Manager (HM), Maria Knight was contacted and arrived some time later. LPA explained reason for visit and completed a Health and Safety check on residents in care. Residents observed in common areas and in rooms. During complaint investigation LPA requested documentation (physicians report, MARS from January through June 2022, staff contact information, reviewed phone records,staff schedule and hospital discharge paperwork) and completed interviews with staff, house manager, RP and Licensee. Interviews disclosed that House Manager contacted POA for resident at time of incident. Although the allegation may or may not have occurred it does not meet the departments standards. The allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. Exit interview completed. A copy of this report given. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, July 14, 2022 · control 24-AS-20220509082643
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility retains a resident who needs a higher level of care Facility did not arrange a meeting with responsible party prior to resident's admission
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
On 4/26/2022 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) M. Garza arrived at facility to complete an initial 10-day complaint visit. LPA was met by Licensee, Jasmin Burns and Facility Manager, Maria Knight. LPA toured facility and completed a Health and Safety check on residents in care. Residents observed in common areas and in rooms. LPA completed interviews with RP, Licensee and Manager. During investigation it was found that R1 was placed at facility when needing a higher level of care. LPA reviewed R1's file and did not observe a copy of a pre-appraisal assessment or physicians report. Interviews conducted showed a proper assessment was not completed prior to resident being placed at the facility. Interviews showed that R1 has a Power of Attorney (POA) for medical and monetary assistance. RP disclosed that POA was not contacted prior to R1 moving to facility. POA stated they informed facility prior to R1's move, R1 required a high level of care then available at faciilty. Manager stated thatCDSS inspection report, April 26, 2022 · control 24-AS-20220425100214
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility does not have sufficient food to feed the residents in care. Facility is not providing resident safe sleeping arrangements.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
On 4/21/2022 Licensing Program Analsyt (LPA) M. Garza arrived at facility to conduct an initial 10-day complaint visit. LPA was met by DIrect Care Staff, Teny Daraphet. Facility Manager, Maria Knight was contacted and arrived some time later. LPA explained reason for visit. Facility toured and a Health and Safety check was completed on residents in care. Residents observed in rooms and in common areas. Interviews conducted with staff and residents. Allegation: Facility is not providing resident safe sleeping arrangements. R1 file reivewed. R1's file is incomplete and did not have a prescription indicating R1 is able to sleep on foam mattress on the floor. Interviews conducted with S1 and RP indicated R1 was sleeping on foam mattress. Allegation: Facility does not have sufficient food to feed the residents in care. LPA reviewed menus, food source and conducted interviews with RP, Administrator, S1 and S2. CONT... SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, April 21, 2022 · control 24-AS-20220418112110

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 16 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for mid-size homes (7–15 beds), computed across all 307 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
3
typical for this size: 0
Type B citations
5
typical for this size: 0
Substantiated complaints
8
typical for this size: 0
Total complaints
5
typical for this size: 1
State visits on file
16
typical for this size: 8
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(209) 201-9783
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run At Haven Home Ii? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.