Simla Villas Inc. is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Bellflower, Los Angeles County, California — state license #198204374, licensed for 15 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 10 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2021, the most recent dated December 8, 2025 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

0 homes in view

Simla Villas Inc.

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Mid-size home, 15 residents · Bellflower, CA · Los Angeles County
LicensedWheelchairHospiceBedriddenMemory care not on file
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #198204374, held since 2004 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
16623 Ardmore Avenue · Bellflower, Los Angeles County
Phone
(562) 804-3603
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 11 residents
Dementia / memory careNot on file — ask the home
Hospice careApproved for 4 residents
Bedridden careApproved for 4 residents

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
FACILITY IS LICENSED TO SERVE AGES 60 AND ABOVE RESIDENTS. 11 NON-AMBULATORY AND 4 BEDRIDDEN RESIDENTS. FACILITY IS APPROVED FOR 4 HOSPICE RESIDENTS.State service designation935 - ELDERLYthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

Since 2021, the state has visited this home 11 times and filed 10 documents. The most recent — a complaint investigation report on December 8, 2025 — closed with the state’s outcome word: “Unsubstantiated.”

Most recent state visit
December 8, 2025
Occupancy at that visit
13 of 15 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 5 documents with transcribed findings, dated December 28, 2023 to December 8, 2025. 5 of the 5 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Unsubstantiated” (5). 5 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 5 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 9 of 10 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20255 state visits · 5 documents
Dec 8, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff left resident soiled overnight.

Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Tena Herrera and Gabriela Castro conducted an unannounced complaint visit to investigate the above allegation. LPAs met with Jennifer Bobodilla and explained the purpose for todays visit. The investigation consisted of the following: LPAs obtained copies of staff and client rosters, documents within Resident #1's (R1) file that include: Physician Report and Home Heath Plan. LPAs interviewed 3 Staff (S1-S3) and 6 Residents (R1-R6). (Continued on LIC9099-C) Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 8, 2025 · control 28-AS-20251204140218
Oct 20, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Licensee is retaining a resident with a higher level of care need. Licensee is not ensuring that resident's medical needs are being met while in care.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Alberto Lopez made initial visit to investigate the above allegations. LPA met with Administrator Jennifer Bobadilla and discussed the purpose of the visit. The investigation consisted of LPA taking tour of facility, obtaining and reviewing staff and resident rosters, R1 Face sheet, Physicians Report for the elderly dated 02/20/2025, and admission agreement. LPA reviewed needs and services and asked facility to send LPA a copy. The investigation revealed regarding allegation: Licensee is retaining a resident with a higher level of care need. It is alleged that facility is retaining R1 that requires a higher level of care. LPA interviewed eight (8) residents and seven (7) of eight (8) residents could not corroborate the allegation. LPA interviewed four (4) staff and three (3) of four (4) staff denied the allegation. R1 stated that R1 gets good care, that R1 room and bed are changed and R1 gets food and R1 body and hair are kept clean. R1 stated that R1 isthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 20, 2025 · control 28-AS-20251016133034
Sep 30, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff yelled at resident. Staff threatened resident. Staff requested resident to turn off oxygen tank. Staff refused to provide care to resident.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Tena Herrera conducted an unannounced complaint visit to investigate the above allegations. LPA met with Administrator Jennifer Bobadilla and the purpose for the visit was explained. The invstigation consisted of the following: LPA obtained copies of staff and client rosters, toured facility, gathered documents within Resident #1's (R1) file that are relevant to complaint, interviewed 4 Staff (S1-S4) and 5 Residents (R1-R5). The investigation revealed the following: (Continued on LIC9099-C) Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 30, 2025 · control 28-AS-20250925233558
Sep 23, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 27, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20242 state visits · 2 documents
Aug 5, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 4, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Unlawful evicition.

**This report supersedes report dated 12/28/2023. The reason it is being superseded is to correct the allegation, as on the original report it was listed as “Staff pushed resident,” when it should have read “Unlawful Eviction.” The finding will remain the same.** Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Erik Zaragoza conducted a subsequent complaint visit regarding the allegation listed above. LPA met with Administrator Jennifer Bobadilla and explained the purpose for the visit. The investigation consisted of the following: During the initial visit conducted on 10/06/2022, LPA Glenn Trueman interviewed Staff #1 - 5 (S1 - S5), Residents #2 - 5 (R2 - R5), and reviewed the file for Resident #1 (R1). During today's visit, LPA Zaragoza re-interviewed Staff #1 - 3 (S1 - S3), obtained the facility's Admission Agreement, House Rules, a Log for residents that sign out of the facility, and Staff Roster. LPA also interviewed Witness #1 (W1) over the phone. LPA attempted to interview R1, however they no lothe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 4, 2024 · control 28-AS-20220930100817
20232 state visits · 2 documents
Dec 28, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Unlawful evicition

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Erik Zaragoza conducted a subsequent complaint visit regarding the allegation listed above. LPA met with Administrator Jennifer Bobadilla and explained the purpose for the visit. The investigation consisted of the following: During the initial visit conducted on 10/06/2022, LPA Glenn Trueman interviewed Staff #1 - 5 (S1 - S5), Residents #2 - 5 (R2 - R5), and reviewed the file for Resident #1 (R1). During today's visit, LPA Zaragoza re-interviewed Staff #1 - 3 (S1 - S3), obtained the facility's Admission Agreement, House Rules, a Log for residents that sign out of the facility, and Staff Roster. LPA also interviewed Witness #1 (W1) over the phone. LPA attempted to interview R1, however they no longer live at the facility. The investigation revealed the following: in regards to the allegation "Staff pushed resident", it is alleged that R1 was illegally evicted from the facility when R1 was signed out by a friend (W1) for a week, and then refused to be allothe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 28, 2023 · control 28-AS-20220930100817
Oct 28, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Beside homes the same size
Type A citations0typical 0
Type B citations0typical 0
Substantiated complaints0typical 0
Total complaints5typical 1
State visits on file11typical 8
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 307 licensed mid-size homes (7–15 beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2004.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated20255502024220202322020221102021110
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$5,000$7,500 /mo
our estimate — Los Angeles County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home isn’t on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →

Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?
How are care plans reviewed when a resident’s needs change?

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (562) 804-3603

Is Simla Villas Inc. licensed?

Yes — Simla Villas Inc. is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Bellflower (Los Angeles County): California license #198204374, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 15 residents. State records list 10 inspection and complaint documents since 2021; the most recent, a complaint investigation report dated December 8, 2025, was marked “Unsubstantiated” by the state.

Can Simla Villas Inc. care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Simla Villas Inc. with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory, hospice care, and bedridden; it does not list dementia / memory care. A clearance that is not on file is not a “no” — it may simply be unrecorded, so if your family needs one of these, ask the home directly and confirm its current scope on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordFACILITY IS LICENSED TO SERVE AGES 60 AND ABOVE RESIDENTS. 11 NON-AMBULATORY AND 4 BEDRIDDEN RESIDENTS. FACILITY IS APPROVED FOR 4 HOSPICE RESIDENTS.

How much does Simla Villas Inc. cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Simla Villas Inc.'s monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in Los Angeles County typically runs $5,000–$7,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $4,000–$6,500/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Simla Villas Inc. accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Simla Villas Inc. is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.

Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

13 of 15 beds occupied (87%) when the state visited on December 8, 2025. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Simla Villas Inc.?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 11 state visits and 10 dated documents since 2021 for Simla Villas Inc.; 5 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated December 8, 2025, records an allegation the state marked “Unsubstantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

5 transcribed reports on file

2025

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff left resident soiled overnight.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Tena Herrera and Gabriela Castro conducted an unannounced complaint visit to investigate the above allegation. LPAs met with Jennifer Bobodilla and explained the purpose for todays visit. The investigation consisted of the following: LPAs obtained copies of staff and client rosters, documents within Resident #1's (R1) file that include: Physician Report and Home Heath Plan. LPAs interviewed 3 Staff (S1-S3) and 6 Residents (R1-R6). (Continued on LIC9099-C) UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, December 8, 2025 · control 28-AS-20251204140218
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedLicensee is retaining a resident with a higher level of care need. Licensee is not ensuring that resident's medical needs are being met while in care.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Alberto Lopez made initial visit to investigate the above allegations. LPA met with Administrator Jennifer Bobadilla and discussed the purpose of the visit. The investigation consisted of LPA taking tour of facility, obtaining and reviewing staff and resident rosters, R1 Face sheet, Physicians Report for the elderly dated 02/20/2025, and admission agreement. LPA reviewed needs and services and asked facility to send LPA a copy. The investigation revealed regarding allegation: Licensee is retaining a resident with a higher level of care need. It is alleged that facility is retaining R1 that requires a higher level of care. LPA interviewed eight (8) residents and seven (7) of eight (8) residents could not corroborate the allegation. LPA interviewed four (4) staff and three (3) of four (4) staff denied the allegation. R1 stated that R1 gets good care, that R1 room and bed are changed and R1 gets food and R1 body and hair are kept clean. R1 stated that R1 isCDSS inspection report, October 20, 2025 · control 28-AS-20251016133034
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff yelled at resident. Staff threatened resident. Staff requested resident to turn off oxygen tank. Staff refused to provide care to resident.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Tena Herrera conducted an unannounced complaint visit to investigate the above allegations. LPA met with Administrator Jennifer Bobadilla and the purpose for the visit was explained. The invstigation consisted of the following: LPA obtained copies of staff and client rosters, toured facility, gathered documents within Resident #1's (R1) file that are relevant to complaint, interviewed 4 Staff (S1-S4) and 5 Residents (R1-R5). The investigation revealed the following: (Continued on LIC9099-C) UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, September 30, 2025 · control 28-AS-20250925233558

2024

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedUnlawful evicition.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
**This report supersedes report dated 12/28/2023. The reason it is being superseded is to correct the allegation, as on the original report it was listed as “Staff pushed resident,” when it should have read “Unlawful Eviction.” The finding will remain the same.** Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Erik Zaragoza conducted a subsequent complaint visit regarding the allegation listed above. LPA met with Administrator Jennifer Bobadilla and explained the purpose for the visit. The investigation consisted of the following: During the initial visit conducted on 10/06/2022, LPA Glenn Trueman interviewed Staff #1 - 5 (S1 - S5), Residents #2 - 5 (R2 - R5), and reviewed the file for Resident #1 (R1). During today's visit, LPA Zaragoza re-interviewed Staff #1 - 3 (S1 - S3), obtained the facility's Admission Agreement, House Rules, a Log for residents that sign out of the facility, and Staff Roster. LPA also interviewed Witness #1 (W1) over the phone. LPA attempted to interview R1, however they no loCDSS inspection report, January 4, 2024 · control 28-AS-20220930100817

2023

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedUnlawful evicition
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Erik Zaragoza conducted a subsequent complaint visit regarding the allegation listed above. LPA met with Administrator Jennifer Bobadilla and explained the purpose for the visit. The investigation consisted of the following: During the initial visit conducted on 10/06/2022, LPA Glenn Trueman interviewed Staff #1 - 5 (S1 - S5), Residents #2 - 5 (R2 - R5), and reviewed the file for Resident #1 (R1). During today's visit, LPA Zaragoza re-interviewed Staff #1 - 3 (S1 - S3), obtained the facility's Admission Agreement, House Rules, a Log for residents that sign out of the facility, and Staff Roster. LPA also interviewed Witness #1 (W1) over the phone. LPA attempted to interview R1, however they no longer live at the facility. The investigation revealed the following: in regards to the allegation "Staff pushed resident", it is alleged that R1 was illegally evicted from the facility when R1 was signed out by a friend (W1) for a week, and then refused to be alloCDSS inspection report, December 28, 2023 · control 28-AS-20220930100817

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 11 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for mid-size homes (7–15 beds), computed across all 307 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing. No substantiated complaints are on file.

Type A citations
0
typical for this size: 0
Type B citations
0
typical for this size: 0
Substantiated complaints
0
typical for this size: 0
Total complaints
5
typical for this size: 1
State visits on file
11
typical for this size: 8
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(562) 804-3603
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Simla Villas Inc.? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.