Illustration — no photo of this home on file yet

Bright Star Assisted Living

Large community·Licensed for 70·Bellflower, California

Licensed since 2020Licence #198603331Medi-Cal ALW
  • Care approvals on fileWheelchair · HospiceState licensing record · September 13, 2026
  • Estimated starting rate$2,700 a monthCovelight estimate · likely $2,100–$3,450
  • Home sizeLicensed for 70Large care community · a licensed care home (RCFE)
  • Room at the last state visit64 of 70 beds occupiedJuly 9, 2026 · not a current opening
  • Ways to payMedi-Cal ALW acceptedDHCS participant list · August 9, 2026
  • Last state visitAugust 25, 2026CDSS inspection record

Bright Star Assisted Living is a large care community in Bellflower — a licensed residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE), the licence category behind “assisted living” and “board and care.” It is licensed for 70 residents since 2020. Dementia care and bedridden care are not on file.

Built from CDSS public records · September 13, 2026. Every fact below names its source and date.

Quick answers and the state record

A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

Quick answers about Bright Star Assisted Living

Is Bright Star Assisted Living licensed?

The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

How many residents is Bright Star Assisted Living licensed for?

70 residents — a large community, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

Has Bright Star Assisted Living been cited?

0 Type A and 2 Type B citations since 2020, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. Those records count 19 state visits over the same years.

Is Bright Star Assisted Living still open?

This license was on the CDSS roster as of September 28, 2026.

What does Bright Star Assisted Living cost?

$2,700 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $2,100–$3,450. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 8 communities with 50 or more beds within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

Among 121 other homes of a similar licensed size across Los Angeles County that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $3,094 to $5,961 a month, and the middle figure is $4,195 (n = 121 other homes publishing a starting rate).

Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.

A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.

The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.

A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.

Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out. What Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver covers in a care home.

Does Bright Star Assisted Living take Medi-Cal?

On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home appears on the DHCS participation list, August 9, 2026. Confirm eligibility and current participation with the program. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.

Who holds the license?

The license is held by Premiercare 2 Congregate Living, Inc., per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

Is there a hospital nearby?

Los Angeles Community Hospital at Bellflower is 0.4 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.

Can Bright Star Assisted Living keep a resident on hospice?

Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 20 residents, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

Bright Star Assisted Living license and inspection record

  • Name on the license: “BRIGHT STAR ASSISTED LIVING”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
  • License #198603331. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • Licensed for 70 residents — a large community, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • Licensed to Premiercare 2 Congregate Living, Inc., per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • First licensed in 2020, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • 19 state inspection visits since 2020, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • 0 Type A and 2 Type B citations on file since 2020, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. The same records count 19 state visits in that period.
  • 8 complaints and 2 substantiated allegations on file since 2020, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
  • The most recent state visit on file is August 25, 2026, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
Type A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗

See the state’s own record

Can they support the care needed?

California licenses a home for specific kinds of care. The state’s record lists what this home is approved for; the home’s own answers fill in what changes as needs change.

  • Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved · covers up to 50 residents
  • Dementia / memory careNot on file · ask the home
  • Hospice careApproved · covers up to 20 residents
  • BedriddenNot on file · ask the home

State licensing record · September 13, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.

Read the state’s own wording
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. APPROVED FOR 70 AMBULATORY OF WHICH 50 MAY BE NON-AMBULATORY. APPROVED HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 20.

935 - ELDERLY

CDSS record, verbatim · September 13, 2026

As needs change

  • Staying through hospice

    Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 20 — care may continue at the end of life

    Ask: “If hospice is needed, can care continue here until the end?”

    State licensing record · September 13, 2026

4 more questions to ask the home
  • Two-person transfers or a lift

    Not on file

    Ask: “If two people or a lift are needed to transfer, can the person stay?”

  • Someone awake overnight

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?”

  • Medicines

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who manages the medicines, and what happens when a dose is missed?”

  • If memory loss develops

    Dementia-care designation not on file

    Ask: “If memory loss develops, what would change — and when would a move be needed?”

What it costs here

Covelight estimate

$2,700a month to start

Likely $2,100–$3,450

From 8 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file

Likely monthly total

$2,700a month

Likely $2,100–$3,700

With a studio and basic help.

An estimate for planning, not a quote. The price is made in the phone call.

See the full cost breakdownRoom, care and fees · how people pay · how this estimate works
Room
Daily care
Sharing the room

Memory care is not priced here: a dementia-care designation is not on file for this home. Ask the home.

  • Starting monthly rate$2,700likely $2,100–$3,450

    Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 8 communities with 50 or more beds within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

  • Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600

    Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (45 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).

  • One-time move-in fee$2,000one time · likely $0–$4,000

    Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,000 (134 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.

Likely monthly totalLikely $2,100–$3,700
$2,700
First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $2,600–$6,950
$4,700
How people payOn the Medi-Cal waiver list · private pay, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
  • Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
  • Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home appears on the DHCS participation list, August 9, 2026. Confirm eligibility and current participation with the program. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board. For a resident on SSI/SSP, California’s 2026 standard sends $1,444.07 a month to the home for room and board.
  • SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
  • VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
  • Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
  • MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
If the money runs out, what Medi-Cal covers
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
  • The care level

    Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.

  • What is billed separately

    Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.

  • Move-in costs

    A one-time community fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.

  • Increases

    California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.

  • What is the full monthly cost for the room and care we need, and what does it include?
  • What would the next care level cost, and who decides when it changes?
  • What is billed separately, and is there a one-time fee or deposit at move-in?
  • Is any private-pay period required before another payment program can begin?
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 8 communities with 50 or more beds within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

8 homes like this within 5 miles publish starting rates mostly between $1,500–$7,300.

  • Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
  • Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
  • Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
  • Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
  • We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
  • It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Show the 8 nearby homes behind this estimate
  • Chateau Long BeachLong Beach · 1.3 mi · Large community
    $1,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
  • Woodruff Care HomeBellflower · 1.4 mi · Large community
    $1,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
  • Brittany HouseLong Beach · 2.1 mi · Large community
    $3,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
  • Ivy Park at CerritosCerritos · 2.2 mi · Large community
    $7,395Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
  • Lakewood GardensDowney · 3.9 mi · Large community
    $7,225Listed on Seniorly · memory care shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026. We don’t have this home’s dementia-care disclosure. California requires a home that advertises dementia care to describe that care in writing when you ask.
  • Coral Oaks Care LivingLynwood · 4.5 mi · Large community
    $1,600Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
  • Downey Retirement CenterDowney · 4.6 mi · Large community
    $1,800Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
  • Palmcrest Grand ResidenceLong Beach · 4.9 mi · Large community
    $2,800Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026

Where it is

  • 9349 Rose Street, Bellflower, CA 90706Address from the public record · September 13, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.

Opening the neighborhood map…

The state record

California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. Here are the dated documents and the state’s own words, beside what is typical for homes this size.

Since 2021, the state has filed 18 documents for this home, and its records count 19 visits since 2020. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated August 25, 2026.

On file since
2021
State visits
19
Most recent visit
August 25, 2026
Occupied · July 9, 2026 visit
64 of 70 bedsa count on that day, not an opening

We hold 10 complaint reports the state published for this home, dated July 23, 2021 to July 9, 2026. 10 of the 10 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (2), “Unsubstantiated” (8). 10 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word. Summary composed by computer from the 10 complaint reports below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

Beside homes the same size

  • Type A citations0typical 0
  • Type B citations2typical 1
  • Substantiated allegations2typical 2
  • Total complaints8typical 6

“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,354 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this licence since 2020.

Year by year
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated202623020254412024241202311020224402021220

The last 36 months — 12 of 18 documents

20262 state visits · 3 documents
Aug 25, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Tena Herrera conducted the required annual inspection. LPA arrived unannounced, met with Administrator Jennifer Serrano and explained the purpose for the visit. The facility is licensed to serve 70 Ambulatory (which 50 may be Non-Ambulatory) residents ages 60+, with a approved hospice waiver for 20. This is a two-story facility located in Bellflower, Ca. A tour of the facility includes: First Floor: Front Office, Conference Room with Storage Room and File Room, Activity Room, Storage Closets Under Parking Port, Laundry Room, Dining Hall, Kitchen, Medication Room, Linen Closet and Outdoor Patio Areas. There are 3 buildings on first floor (A,B,F&G) totaling 16 Resident Rooms, 6 Full Bathrooms, 4 Half Bathrooms. Second Floor: 3 buildings totaling 28 Resident Rooms, 8 Full Bathrooms, 4 Half Bathrooms, Patio Area and Storage Closets. There are call buttons in and smoke detectors in each unit and there is an emergency sprinkler system throughout facility. LPA utilized the Compliance and Regulatory Enforcement (CARE) tools for the visit today and observed the following: Infection Control: The facility maintains the required Infection Control Plan. Operational Requirements: The facility maintains an approved Fire Clearance and the required Liability Insurance which is valid until 11/17/26. Physical Plant & Environment Safety: LPA toured facility, a total of 10 residents’ bedrooms/units were checked and had the required closet/drawer space to accommodate each resident comfortably available. The resident rooms each had a signal system with call buttons that were tested an operating properly. There are smoke detectors, carbon monoxide detectors and an emergency sprinkler system throughout the facility that are operable and in compliance. (Continued on 809C) Physical Plant & Environment Safety (continued): The fire extinguishers were observed and are fully charged. No bodies of water were observed at facility. Hot water temperature was tested throughout the facility and measured outside the required range of 105-120 degrees, measurements were between 125.1-141.1 citation issued. The passageways are free of debris/hazards and are free of obstruction All storage areas for cleaning solutions, toxins, knives, and hazardous items are properly stored are inaccessible to residents. Staffing & Personnel Records-Training: There appears to be sufficient staffing at all times. Staff files are maintained in a secure location. Staff files observed during today’s visit have criminal record clearance, health screening and current First Aid/CPR/AED certificates. Administrator Jennifer Serrano certificate expires on 3/12/2027.(3 of the 6 files reviewed during visit were missing proof of completed trainings citation issued) Resident Rights-Information: Personal Rights and Complaint signage are posted within the Dining Hall. Resident Records-Incident Reports: Resident files are maintained in the Administrators Office and have the following documents in their files - Admission Agreements, Identification & Emergency Information, current Physician's Report, Pre-admission appraisal/Appraisal Needs & Services Plan (Technical Violation given for Appraisal Needs and Services Plans for R1 & R2 that were missing resident signatures, details provided on LIC 9102TV Form that was provided during visit). Planned Activities: LPA observed the Activity Schedule posted in the Dining Hall and toured the Activity Room, there were books, magazines, supplies for activities, board games and puzzles readily available for residents. The facility has a designated Activity Director. Food Service: The kitchen was observed for the ability to prepare and serve food. LPA observed an appropriate food supply of two (2) days of perishables and one week (7 days) of non-perishables. Incidental Medical & Dental: Medications are centrally stored in locked Medication Room and in their original containers. LPA reviewed 7 residents medications with no issues observed. Disaster Preparedness: The facility has an Emergency Disaster Plan posted with contact numbers and at least 2 relocation sites. Facility maintains documentation of the required emergency drills, last drill conducted on 8/5/26. Residents with Special Health Needs: The facility is in communication with the Home Health agency to ensure the needs of residents are being met. Per California Code of Regulations, Title 22, and California Health and Safety Code, the deficiencies observed during the visit are documented on the LIC809D page. Exit interview was held and a copy of the report and appeal rights were provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 25, 2026
Jul 9, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not allow resident to return to the facility.

On 07/09/2026, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jewel Baptiste conducted an initial 10-day complaint investigation in conjunction with case management. LPA met with the Administrator, Jennifer Serrano, and discussed the purpose of today's visit. During the initial visit, LPA interviewed the Administrator and one (1) staff member who shall be known as S2. S1 is not at the facility, and LPA attempted to contact them three (3) times. LPA interviewed a total of seven (7) residents who shall be known as (R1-R7). LPA also interviewed three (3) Deparment of Mental Health services employees/ Case workers for R1, who shall be referred to as W1- W3. R1’s family members were also interviewed, who shall be known as W4. LPA obtained the current Resident roster, staff roster, R1 appraisal/Needs and Services plan, R1’s physicians' report, Incident report dated 6/22/2026, Exit form from DMH/HSH, R1’s admission agreement, and R1 Identification and Emergency Information. Report continued on 9099c Unsubstantiated The investigation reveals the following: " Staff did not allow resident to return to the facility”. It is alleged that the facility did not allow R1 to return following their hospital stay. During the interview with the Administrator, they stated that R1 went to the hospital on 6/22/2026 and was discharged on 7/5/2026. On Wednesday, 7/1/2026, the hospital nurse contacted R2 and stated R1 is ready for discharge. R2 gave the phone to S1, who then gave the phone to S2. S2 stated that they told the nurse the hospital usually gives them 24 hours' notice before discharge to get R1 reassessed, and R1 was still feeling weak. All staff denied telling the hospital that R1 can not return to the facility. R1 and W4 stated that the administrator told them that they must be reassessed. All residents stated that the facility has never denied them access to return to the facility, nor have they heard any complaints from other residents regarding that topic. Interviews with all witnesses indicated it was a misunderstanding, and the facility never denied the resident's return. There were no eviction notices given. Based on LPA's interviews, the investigation revealed that although the allegation may have occurred or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove whether the alleged violation occurred; therefore, the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. Exit interview conducted with Administrator Jennifer Serrano and a copy of this record provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 9, 2026 · control 28-AS-20260702094442
Jul 9, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Other

On 07/09/2026, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jewel Baptiste conducted an initial 10-day complaint investigation in conjunction with case management. LPA met with the Administrator, Jennifer Serrano, and discussed the purpose of today's visit. LPA Baptiste stated to the facility that they need to ensure the facility understands that, although they must adhere to the Department of Mental Health's program, compliance cannot come at the expense of Title 22 regulations. The facility will conduct staff training to ensure all staff know how to answer questions whenever the hospital calls. Exit interview conducted with the Administrator, Jennifer Serrano, and a copy of the report provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 9, 2026
20254 state visits · 4 documents
Sep 15, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Daniel Konishi conducted the required annual inspection. LPA arrived unannounced and met the Administrator, Jennifer Serrano and the LPA explained the purpose of the visit. The facility is licensed to serve 70 Ambulatory (of which 50 may be Non-Ambulatory) residents ages 60 and over. With an approved hospice waiver for 20. LPA utilized the Compliance and Regulatory Enforcement (CARE) tools for the visit today and observed the following: Infection Control: The facility staff are using appropriate hand hygiene and gloves while assisting residents’ medications. Staff are still cleaning and disinfecting throughout the day. The facility has sufficient PPE supplies and has an Infection Control Plan maintained at the facility. Operational Requirements: The facility maintains a current Plan of Operation and an approved Fire Clearance. The facility maintains the required Liability Insurance. Physical Plant & Environment Safety: This is a two-story facility includes: First Floor: Front Office, Conference Room with Storage Room and File Room, Activity Room, Storage Closets Under Parking Port, Laundry Room, Dining Hall, Kitchen, Medication Room, Linen Closet and Outdoor Patio Areas. There are 3 buildings on the first floor (A, B, F&G) totaling 16 Resident Rooms, 6 Full Bathrooms, 4 Half Bathrooms. Second Floor: 3 buildings totaling 28 Resident Rooms, 8 Full Bathrooms, 4 Half Bathrooms, Patio Area and Storage Closets. There are call buttons in and smoke detectors in each unit and there is an emergency sprinkler system throughout the facility. LPA toured facility, a total of 11 residents’ bedrooms/units were checked and had the required closet/drawer space to accommodate each resident comfortably available. Physical Plant & Environment Safety (continued): LPA observed two (2) evacuation chairs that were mounted nearby the stairways. The residents’ rooms each had a signal system with call buttons that were tested and operating properly. There are smoke detectors, carbon monoxide detectors and an emergency sprinkler system throughout the facility that are operable and in compliance. The fire extinguishers observed are fully charged and last inspected on 11/22/2024. No bodies of water were observed at the facility. Hot water temperature was tested in 11 bathrooms throughout the facility and measured from 105.2 degrees F to 118.4 degrees F which are within the required range of 105-120 degrees F. The passageways are free of debris/hazards and are free of obstruction. All storage areas for cleaning solutions, toxins, knives, and hazardous items that are properly stored are inaccessible to residents. Staffing: There appears to be sufficient staffing at all times with at least one night-time staff that is able to operate the facility signal system, is familiar with emergency procedures and has current CPR and First Aid training on file. Personnel Records-Training: LPA reviewed five (5) staff files which includes personnel record, criminal record clearance, health screening, TB clearance, valid First Aid/CPR/AED training, Employee Rights, dementia training, and sufficient on-going training. Administrator’s certificate expired on 03/12/2027. Resident Rights-Information: Personal Rights and Complaint signage are posted within the Dining Hall. Resident Records-Incident Reports: LPA reviewed seven (7) resident files that include: Admission Agreements, Identification & Emergency Information, current Physician's Report, TB Clearance, Ambulatory Status, Pre-admission appraisal/Appraisal Needs & Services Plan, and Personal Rights. Planned Activities: LPA observed the Activity Schedule posted in the Dining Hall and toured the Activity Room, there were books, magazines, supplies for activities, board games and puzzles readily available for residents. The facility has a designated Activity Director. Food Service: The kitchen was observed for its ability to prepare and serve food. LPA observed an appropriate food supply of two (2) days of perishables and one week (7 days) of non-perishables. Incidental Medical & Dental: Medications are centrally stored in locked Medication Room and in their original containers. LPA reviewed seven (7) residents’ medications and there were no issues. Disaster Preparedness: The facility has an Emergency Disaster Plan posted with contact numbers and at least 2 relocation sites. The facility maintains documentation of the required emergency drills. The last Fire Drill was conducted on 07/24/2025. Residents with Special Health Needs: The facility is in communication with the Home Health agency to ensure the needs of residents are being met. There are currently no residents under hospice service. LPA observed half bed rails in Resident #4 (R4's) bedroom and physician's order for a half bed rail for Resident #4 (R4) was not in file. Per California Code of Regulations, Title 22, and California Health and Safety Code, the deficiencies observed during the visit are documented on 809D. Exit interview was held and a copy of the report and appeal rights were provided Administrator Jennfier Serrano.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 15, 2025
Jul 8, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff do not prevent residents from using illegal drugs.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Tena Herrera conducted an unannounced subsequent compliant visit to investigate the above allegation. LPA met with Assistant Administrator Jennifer Serrano, and the purpose for todays visit was explained. The investigation consisted of the following: During the initial visit dated 2/20/25 LPA obtained copies of Staff/Resident Rosters and toured facility. During todays visit LPA toured facility, LPA obtained Surveillance Videos via email, interviewed 3 Staff (S1-S3) and 6 Residents (R1-R6). (Continued on LIC9099-C) Unsubstantiated The investigation revealed the following: Allegation: Staff do not prevent residents from using illegal drugs. It is alleged that residents are doing crystal meth in the bathrooms. LPA toured facility and a total of 6 restrooms were inspected during the tour, smoking areas and patios were observed and there were no signs of drugs or drug use during the tour. Surveillance footage was also shared with LPA via email from dates 2-28-25,3-1-25 and 3-5-25 LPA reviewed videos and did not observe any unusual activity in the footage. LPA interviewed 3 staff and 3 out of 3 staff denied the above allegation and stated that they have not seen any of the residents using drugs in the facility and residents have not brought it to their attention. LPA interviewed 6 residents and 5 out of 6 residents denied the above allegation and stated the new administration has a zero tolerance for drug use at the facility, 2 residents stated that they did observe some residents doing drugs over a year ago, they never reported it and have not seen any of this happening since the new administration started a little over a year ago. Based on statements and interviews conducted with staff/residents, tour of facility, review of surveillance videos, and LPA’s observations, there was not enough supportive evidence to concur with the reported allegation. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. Exit interview held, and a copy of this report was emailed to Jennifer at brightstarassistedliving@gmail.com.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 8, 2025 · control 28-AS-20250219085029
May 1, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility illegally evicted a resident in care.

Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Luis De Leon, Blanca Gonzalez, and Licensing Program Manager (LPM) Fernando Fierros conducted a follow up complaint investigation for the allegations listed above. LPA arrived unannounced and met with the Administrator Jennifer Serrano. The purpose for the visit was discussed. On 03/10/25, LPA DeLeon conducted the initial visit, during visit, LPA DeLeon owing on today’s visit: LPA along with Assistant Administrator and Operations Manager toured the kitchen and food pantry, including the common dining area. LPA toured kitchen and observed enough food, the meal being served during the lunch hour was also observed and appeared as a well-balanced meal: Baked Chicken, Rice, Mixed Green Salad, and mixed Vegetables. Serving portions were adequate for residents. LPA reviewed the food menu for January-February 2025. LPA obtained copies of the staff and resident roster, admission agreement, eviction letter, facility food menu and food supply orders. Report continues on page LIC9099-C Substantiated On today’s visit, LPA's De Leon, and Gonzalez and LPM Fernando Fierros met with Administrator Jennifer Serrano and assisted with the visit. The investigation consisted of LPAs obtaining copies of the staff and resident rosters, admission agreement, facility weekly menu for April, weekly food invoices for April, and eviction notice. LPA's toured the facility dining room, food pantry, and kitchen areas and observed food service for lunch. In regards to the allegation “Staff did not provide an adequate amount of food to a resident in care”. it is alleged that that facility serves sandwich and chip for dinner and residents are not provided with a sufficient amount of food. The investigation reveals the following: Seven (7) out of seven (7) staff denied that residents are not provided with an adequate portion of food during meals. Six (6) out of seven (7) residents denied receiving insufficient portions of food for each meals served at the facility, and, if seconds are requested or residents preferred not to have food from the menu, kitchen staff accommodated the residents by providing other food options. In addition, if residents were not able to have a meal at the schedule service time, the staff would store their meals for later. In addition, kitchen manager stated that if a resident prefers alternative meal other than the published meal on the food menu, the kitchen staff will prepare special meals per the resident's requests. The investigation revealed that residents are provided with adequate amount of food consisted of three meals a day and snack in between meals In regards to the allegation “Staff retaliated against a resident in care”. It is alleged that a resident is being evicted for filing a complaint. The investigation reveals the following: Seven (7) out of seven (7) staff denied knowledge of staff retaliating against residents for any reason. Six (6) out of seven (7) residents expressed being comfortable submitting a complaint to administration without fear of retaliation, none of the residents have heard of any residents being retaliated against for filing a complaint and expressed that staff treat residents with respect. Staff acts professionally even when residents do not follow facility rules, but none of the residents recall an incident where staff were disrespectful. The investigation revealed that residents are not retaliated against by staff and staff treat residents with respect, Based on statements and interviews conducted with staff/residents, review of R1's file and observations made during facility tour, there was not enough supportive evidence to concur with the reported allegations. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED. Exit interview held, and a copy of this report and appeal rights were provided. On today’s visit, LPA's De Leon, and Gonzalez and LPM Fernando Fierros met with Administrator Jennifer Serrano who assisted with the visit. The investigation consisted of LPAs obtaining copies of the staff and resident rosters, Resident #1(R1's) admission agreement, facility weekly food menu for April, weekly food invoices, and R1's eviction notice. LPAs toured the facility dining room and kitchen. In regard to the allegation “Facility illegally evicted a resident in care”. It is alleged that a resident is being evicted for nonpayment for rent for basic services and for filing a complaint against the facility. The investigation reveals the following: One out of Seven staff were aware of a resident being evicted for non- payment of rent. Six (6) out of Seven (7) staff members were not aware of any resident being evicted from facility. Six (6) out of (7) residents are not aware of any evictions being issued to residents. Per Administrator the facility issued an eviction notice to a R1 on February 17, 2025 due to non payment of rent. Further review of eviction notice reveals that, although the reason of eviction is valid, the facility did not include information regarding resources available to assist with alternative housing or a referral for alternative housing. In addition, the facility did not include the resident's right to file a complaint with the State Long Term Care Ombudsman office and a message informing tenant that the facility must file an unlawful detainer action in superior court and receive a written judgment signed by a judge. Therefore, the investigation revealed that the facility issued an illegal eviction notice to R1 on 02/17/25 and did not meet the required eviction guideline set forth by the California Code of Regulations, Title 22. Based on interviews conducted, observation and documents reviewed, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the allegation is found SUBSTANTIATED. California Code of Regulations Title 22, Division 6, and Chapter 8 are being cited on the attached LIC 9099-D. Exit interview held, and a copy of this report and appeal rights were provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 1, 2025 · control 28-AS-20250303111044

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87224(d)(1)(B)(C)(D) · Plan of correction due date: May 8, 2025

87224 Eviction Procedures (d) The licensee shall set forth in the notice to quit the reasons relied upon for the eviction with specific facts to permit determination of the date, place, witnesses, and circumstances concerning those reasons. (1) The notice to quit shall include the following information: This requirement is not met as evidenced by: During todays visit, LPA observed the Eviction Notice to R1 dated 02/17/25 was missing the following: Resources available, Referral Services, Right to file a complaint, unlawful detainer process and cross report to LTC0 Ombudsman isthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 1, 2025

Plan of correction: Licensee will rescind the eviction notice issued to R1and copy licensing. Licensee will send a letter to licensing indicating the licensee has read and will comply with Section 87224 by POC due date.

Jan 23, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not address a resident's change in medical condition. Staff did not properly dispose a needle. Staff mishandled a resident's medication. Staff served uncooked food to a resident. Staff sexually harassed a resident while in care. Staff unlawfully evicted a resident. Staff mishandled a resident's personal belongings.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Tena Herrera conducted an unannounced complaint visit to determine the validity of the above-mentioned allegations. LPA met with Silvia Vidal and explained the reason for the visit. The investigation consisted of the following: LPA obtained copies of the staff and resident rosters, reviewed R1's file and obtained copies of relevant documents, LPA toured medication room and reviewed 7 residnets medications, LPA toured kitchen and observed meal being served for lunch, and LPA interviewed 5 Staff (S1-S5) and 7 Residents (R1-R7). (continued on LIC9099-C) Unsubstantiated The investigation revealed the following: Allegation: Staff did not address a resident's change in medical condition. It is alleged that R1 sustained multiple falls at facility. LPA interviewed R1 and it was stated that they did sustained falls at facility and staff assisted them after their fall, they refused to be admitted to be sent to hospital for further treatment. LPA interviewed 5 staff and 5 out of 5 staff denied the above allegation and stated that when there are falls they tend to the resident immediately, offer check for bruising or cuts, offer if they would like to go to the hospital for further treatment, if they decline hospital they monitor the resident post fall, the fall is then documented and an incident report is filed. If there is a change in medical condition observed staff will ask resident if they would like to see a doctor to be assessed, if refusal staff will document changes and let their physician know of the changes with the resident. LPA interviewed 7 residents and 7 out of 7 residents denied the above allegation and stated that staff assists them in a timely manner with any medical needs. Allegation: Staff did not properly dispose a needle It is alleged that R1 fell and stepped on a needle after a nurse failed to dispose it correctly. LPA interviewed R1 and it was stated that the needle that they stepped on was in their room but did not show the staff the needle or get assistance from staff with this incident. LPA interviewed 5 staff and 5 out of 5 staff denied the above allegation and stated that all medications, including injections are kept in the medication room, administered in the medication room and have never seen any needles on the floor, all needles are disposed of in a specific box, which LPA also observed during visit. LPA interviewed 7 residents and 6 out of 7 residents denied the above allegation and stated that they have never seen a needle on the floor and confirmed all medication is given at the medication room. Allegation: Staff mishandled a resident's medication It is alleged that R1’s medication would frequently get mixed up with another resident’s. LPA toured medication room reviewed 7 residents medications with no issues observed. LPA interviewed 5 staff and 5 out of 5 staff denied the above allegation. S4 and S5 assist with administering medication and stated that they are careful with the medication to avoid situations like these, they also stated that although residents may sometimes question their medication they will take the resident to the medication room and show them the medication in original package to confirm medication is for the resident. LPA interviewed 7 residents and 6 out of 7 residents denied the above allegation stating that they have never had any issues with their medication. (Continued on LIC9099-C) Allegation: Staff served uncooked food to a resident It is alleged that R1 was served uncooked food while living here that resulted in R1 getting sick multiple times. LPA toured kitchen and meal being served for day, the meat appeared to be well cooked. LPA interviewed 5 staff and 5 out of 5 staff denied the above allegation and stated that they have never had a resident complain that the food is uncooked and have not witnessed any residents getting sick from the food. LPA interviewed 7 residents and 6 out of 7 residents denied the above allegation and stated that although the chicken may be a little overcooked they have never observed it to be undercooked nor have they gotten sick from the food at the facility. Allegation: Staff sexually harassed a resident while in care It is alleged that R1 was sexually harassed by S1 and S2. LPA interviewed R1 and it was stated that S1 and S2 would try to hug and kiss R1, and that S1 would open the door to R1’s room at different hours of the night and watch R1 from the doorway. During interview with S3 it was revealed that the night shift does rounds every 2 hours, where they open the residents room door check to see the resident is present and will leave once they can confirm movement or that the resident is breathing, S3 also stated that they have never had any complaints against S1 and S2 of sexual harassment. LPA interviewed 5 Staff and 5 out of 5 staff denied the above allegation and stated that they have never sexually harassed a resident nor have they ever heard of another staff sexually harassing a resident. LPA interviewed 7 residents and 6 out of 7 residents denied the above allegation stating they have never been sexually harassed by staff. Allegation: Staff unlawfully evicted a resident It is alleged that R1 was not given proper notice that they were going to be forced to leave facility after R1 was hospitalized. During interview with S3 it was explained that R1 was hospitalized on a psychiatric hold, once released from the hospital the facility was notified that the resident was going to be transferred to a different facility, S3 spoke with family of R1 and it was confirmed that R1 will be moving to a facility closer to them, R1 was never evicted from facility. LPA interviewed 5 staff and 5 out of 5 staff denied the above allegation and confirmed that residents are given warnings prior to any evictions and have never witnessed an unlawful eviction. LPA interviewed 7 residents and 6 out of 7 residents denied the above allegation and stated that although they haven’t been evicted they have not witnessed another resident be evicted without reason. (Continued on LIC9099-C) Allegation: Staff mishandled a resident's personal belongings It is alleged that R1 was never given an opportunity to properly pick up their belongings and when R1 went to collect their belongings everything was in the front of the street, with items missing. LPA interviewed 5 staff and 5 out of 5 staff denied the above allegation stating that residents items are typically packed and stored in the storage room for at least 30 days to allow residents to collect their items. LPA interviewed S4, who assisted R1 with gathering their belongings and it was stated that R1s items were stored in the storage room near administrative office and R1 collected their items with no issues that day, R1’s items were never placed on the street. LPA interviewed 7 residents and 6 out of 7 residents denied the above allegation and stated that they have never witnessed any residents belongings on the street and feel staff handle their personal items with care. Based on statements and interviews conducted with staff/residents, review of R1's file and observations made during facility tour, there was not enough supportive evidence to concur with the reported allegations. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED. Exit interview held, and a copy of this report will be emailed to Silvia Vidal at brightstarassistedliving@gmail.com.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 23, 2025 · control 28-AS-20250115120125
20242 state visits · 4 documents
Dec 12, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not obtain permits to do construction on the facility.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Tena Herrera conducted an unannounced complaint visit to determine the validity of the above-mentioned allegation. LPA met with Jennifer Serrano and Silvia Vidal, and explained the reason for the visit. The investigation consisted of the following: LPA obtained copies of the staff and resident rosters, copy of the Cirrection Notice (stop work order) issued from City of Bellfower, and photo copies of work being done to dining. LPA interviewed 2 Staff (S1&S2) and 6 Residents (R1-R6). (continued on LIC9099-C) Substantiated The Investigation Revealed the Following: Allegation: Staff did not obtain permits to do construction on the facility. It is alleged that there is construction being done at facility and staff did not obtain proper permits for construction. LPA interviewed S1 & S2 and both confirmed that there was work done to repair a leak in the dining, as work was being done the city of bellflower code enforcement arrived and issued a stop work order, and advised staff to obtain the needed permits prior to continuing remodel. LPA obtained a copy of the Correction Notice dated 11/18/24 that indicated the Stop Work Order. LPA interviewed 6 residents and 6 out of 6 residents stated that the work being done in the dining did not affect them and that they are able to have meals in dining even with the remodel. LPA was never given prior notice for the work being done and the failure to report/ failure to submit an incident report of remodel will be cited in a Case Management visit today. Based on LPAs observations and interviews which were, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6 and Chapter 8 are being cited on the attached LIC 9099D. Exit interview held, and a copy of this report and appeal rights were provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 12, 2024 · control 28-AS-20241209121049

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87305(a) · Plan of correction due date: Jan 3, 2025

87305 Alterations to Existing Building or New Facilities (a) Prior to construction or alterations, all facilities shall obtain a building permit. This standard was not met as evidence by: During interviews with S1 and S2 both confirmed that construction had begun to dining area and was stopped as City of Bellflower Code Enforcement arrived on 11/18/24 at 10:45am with a Stop Work Order and informed facility staff that all necessary approvals/permits must be obtained prior to continuing remodel in dining.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 12, 2024

Plan of correction: Licensee/Administrator to email LPA a copy of permits/apporoval by POC due date along with any updates/paperwork from City of Bellflower regarding the remodel to dining area. tena.herrera@dss.ca.gov

Dec 12, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not give resident a proper rate increase.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Tena Herrera conducted an unannounced complaint visit to determine the validity of the above-mentioned allegation. LPA met with Jennifer Serrano and Silvia Vidal, and explained the reason for the visit. The investigation consisted of the following: LPA obtained copies of the staff and resident rosters, Notice of Payment Standard for Individuals from Social Security, LPA reviewed 3 resident admission agreements and rates. LPA interviewed 2 Staff (S1&S2) and 6 Residents (R1-R6). (Continued on LIC9099-C) Unsubstantiated The Investigation Revealed the Following: Allegation: Staff did not give resident a proper rate increase. It is alleged that on 12/6/24 R1 was informed that they will have a rent increase of $400 and if they refused to pay the increase they would be evicted. LPA interviewed S1 and S2 and it was explained that the rent notification that was provided to residents was the new Social Security Payment Standard Increase that takes effect January 2025. This increase letter explains the new rate increase/adjustments to Social Security Income (SSI) benefits, the amount provided by SSI for room and board, and care and supervision has increased therefore the facility will now be receiving that new among. This came as a shock to residents as some residents were not used to paying their full amount that is on their agreement because the previous Administrator of the facility was not following protocol. Both S1 and S2 confirmed that the residents will not be charged back pay for the previous months but moving forward beginning in January 2025 residents will be responsible to pay the agreed amount. LPA reviewed R1’s admission agreement and the admission agreement indicated that the previous amount was for the previous year (2024) SSI amount for board and care. LPA also reviewed letter of increase that was given to R1 and it was the same as the Social Security Payment Standard Increase that was mentioned to LPA by Staff, LPA explained to R1 how this rate is done yearly and the facility themselves are adjusting the rent to match what Social Security is now providing for board and care costs. LPA interviewed 6 residents and 6 out of 6 residents indicated that they were provided with the rent increase letter in a timely manner, had no complaints and are used to the yearly minor adjustments to the rent. Based on statements and interviews conducted, review of client files and increase letters, there was not enough supportive evidence to concur with the reported allegation. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. Exit interview held, and a copy of this report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 12, 2024 · control 28-AS-20241209121049
Dec 12, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Deficiencies

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Tena Herrera conducted a Case Management Visit-Deficiencies on, stemming from initial complaint investigation conducted on 12/12/24, complaint control # 28-AS-20241209121049. LPA Herrera met with Jennifer Serrano and Silvia Vidal and explained the reason for visit. Case Management-Deficiencies findings: During complaint investigation it was revealed that facility Administrator/Licensee failed to report to the department of renovations that were being done to the facility dining area. Renovations began on approximately 11/13/24 and was stopped due to failure to obtain necessary approvals/permits by the City of Bellflower (failure for permit, cited on complaint visit). LPA was never informed of the remodel nor were there any incident reports provided to the department indicating there were plans for renovations. LPA will issue a deficiency on Reporting Requirements that can be found on the LIC809-D. Exit interview held, and a copy of this report and appeal rights were provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 12, 2024

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 80086(a) · Plan of correction due date: Dec 26, 2024

80086 Alterations to Existing Building or New Facilities (a) Prior to construction or alterations, all licensees shall notify the licensing agency of the proposed change. This standard was not met as evidence by: Administrator/Licensee failed to report to the department of renovations that were being done to the facility dining area. Renovations began on approximately 11/13/24 and licensing became aware of remodel to dining due to a complaint that was generated on 12/9/24.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 12, 2024

Plan of correction: Administrator/Licensee to submit an Incident Report to LPA by POC due date that discloses all renovations that have been done when it started, why it stopped and when it is schedule to end. Incident report can be emailed to LPA tena.herrera@dss.ca.gov

Aug 15, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Tena Herrera conducted the required annual inspection. LPA arrived unannounced and was greeted by MedTech/Caregiver Yakelin Carrillo, shortly after Luisa Mascardo (Administrator) arrived and assisted with the visit. The purpose for the visit was explained upon arrival. The facility is licensed to serve 70 Ambulatory (of which 50 may be Non-Ambulatory) residents ages 60 and over. With an approved hospice waiver for 20. (there are currently no residents on hospice at the facility). This is a two-story facility located in Bellflower, Ca. A tour of the facility includes: First Floor: Front Office, Conference Room with Storage Room and File Room, Activity Room, Storage Closets Under Parking Port, Laundry Room, Dining Hall, Kitchen, Medication Room, Linen Closet and Outdoor Patio Areas. There are 3 buildings on first floor (A,B,F&G) totaling 16 Resident Rooms, 6 Full Bathrooms, 4 Half Bathrooms. Second Floor: 3 buildings totaling 28 Resident Rooms, 8 Full Bathrooms, 4 Half Bathrooms, Patio Area and Storage Closets. There are call buttons in and smoke detectors in each unit and there is an emergency sprinkler system throughout facility. LPA utilized the Compliance and Regulatory Enforcement (CARE) tools for the visit today and observed the following: Infection Control: The facility staff are using appropriate hand hygiene and gloves while assisting residents’ medications. Staff are still cleaning and disinfecting throughout the day. Facility has sufficient PPE supplies and has an Infection Control Plan maintained at the facility. Operational Requirements: The facility maintains a current Plan of Operation and an approved Fire Clearance. The facility maintains the required Liability Insurance. Physical Plant & Environment Safety: LPA toured facility, a total of 14 residents’ bedrooms/units were checked and had the required closet/drawer space to accommodate each resident comfortably available. The resident rooms each had a signal system with call buttons that were tested an operating properly. There are smoke detectors, carbon monoxide detectors and an emergency sprinkler system throughout the facility that are operable and in compliance. (Continued on 809C) Physical Plant & Environment Safety (continued): The fire extinguishers were observed and are fully charged. No bodies of water were observed at facility. Hot water temperature was tested throughout the facility and measured within the required range of 105-120 degrees. The passageways are free of debris/hazards and are free of obstruction All storage areas for cleaning solutions, toxins, knives, and hazardous items are properly stored are inaccessible to residents. Staffing: There appears to be sufficient staffing at all times with at least one nighttime staff that is able to operate the facility signal system, is familiar with emergency procedures and has a current CPR and First Aid training on file. Personnel Records-Training: Staff files are maintained in a locked storage room within the Conference Room. Staff files observed during today’s visit have criminal record clearance, health screening and current First Aid/CPR/AED certificates (with the exception of 1 staff that was missing First-Aid certificate, cited on 809-D), dementia training, and sufficient on-going training. Administrator Luisa Mascardo certificate expired on 5/28/24, but was able to provide proof of pending renewal and all current training were within the personnel file, CCL website showed pending renewal, expiration of 5/28/26.Resident Rights-Information: Personal Rights and Complaint signage are posted within the Dining Hall. Resident Records-Incident Reports: Resident files are maintained in the Administrators Office and have the following documents in their files - Admission Agreements, Identification & Emergency Information, current Physician's Report, Pre-admission appraisal/Appraisal Needs & Services Plan (1 of the resident files reviewed were missing their Physician Report, details cited on 809-D page). Planned Activities: LPA observed the Activity Schedule posted in the Dining Hall and toured the Activity Room, there were books, magazines, supplies for activities, board games and puzzles readily available for residents. The facility has a designated Activity Director. Food Service: The kitchen was observed for the ability to prepare and serve food. LPA observed an appropriate food supply of two (2) days of perishables and one week (7 days) of non-perishables. Incidental Medical & Dental: Medications are centrally stored in locked Medication Room and in their original containers. Disaster Preparedness: The facility has an Emergency Disaster Plan posted with contact numbers and at least 2 relocation sites. Facility maintains documentation of the required emergency drills. Residents with Special Health Needs: The facility is in communication with the Home Health agency to ensure the needs of residents are being met. Per California Code of Regulations, Title 22, and California Health and Safety Code, the deficiencies observed during the visit are documented on 809D. Exit interview was held and a copy of the report and appeal rights were provided Administrator Luisa Mascardothe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 15, 2024
20231 state visit · 1 document
Oct 21, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Tena Herrera conducted the required annual inspection. LPA arrived unannounced and was greeted by MedTech Venus Andres and later by Yakelin Carrillo (caregiver) and Luisa Mascardo (Administrator) who later assisted with the visit. The purpose for the visit was explained upon arrival. The facility is licensed to serve 70 Ambulatory (of which 50 may be Non-Ambulatory) residents ages 60 and over. With an approved hospice waiver for 20. (there are currently no residents on hospice at the facility). This is a two-story facility located in Bellflower, Ca. A tour of the facility includes: First Floor: Front Office, Conference Room with Storage Room and File Room, Activity Room, 16 Resident Rooms, 5 Full Bathrooms, 2 Half Bathroom, Dining Hall, Kitchen, Medication Room, Storage Rooms, Linen Closet and Outdoor Patio Area. Second Floor: 28 Resident Rooms, 6 Full Bathrooms, 4 Half Bathrooms, Patio Area and Storage Closets. Infection Control: The facility staff are using appropriate hand hygiene and gloves while assisting residents’ medications. Staff are still cleaning and disinfecting throughout the day. Facility has sufficient PPE supplies and has an Infection Control Plan maintained at the facility. Operational Requirements: The facility maintains a current Plan of Operation and an approved Fire Clearance. The facility maintains the required Liability Insurance covering injury to residents and guests, however, the coverage for total annual aggregate is not within the required amount, details provided on the 809D page. Physical Plant & Environment Safety: LPA toured facility there are a total of 44 resident bedrooms (36 double rooms and 8 single rooms) a total of 15 resident rooms were checked and bedding/closet/drawer space to accommodate each resident comfortably was available. The passageways and patio areas were observed to be free of debris/hazards and are free of obstruction. No bodies of water were observed at the facility. There are no security bars or weapons on the premises. Hygiene products are readily available for residents. (Continued on 809C) The hot water temperature was tested throughout the facility and were above the required range of 105-120 degrees F, details will be documented on 809D page. All storage areas for cleaning solutions, toxins, knives, and hazardous items are properly stored are inaccessible to residents. Smoke detectors and carbon monoxide detectors are operable and in compliance. There fire extinguishers were observed and are fully charged. Facility operates a signal system LPA observed call buttons in rooms and restrooms that were toured. Staffing: There appears to be sufficient staffing at all times with at least one nighttime staff that is able to operate the facility signal system, is familiar with emergency procedures and has a current CPR and First Aid training on file. Personnel Records-Training: Staff files are maintained in a locked storage room within the Conference Room. Staff files observed during today’s visit have criminal record clearance, health screening with negative TB results and current First Aid/CPR/AED certificates and sufficient on-going training. Administrator Luisa Mascardo certificate expires on 5/28/24. Resident Rights-Information: Personal Rights and Complaint signage are posted within the Dining Hall. The facility does not have any clients that require postural supports. Facility provides a telephone land line for the residents. Resident Records-Incident Reports: Resident files are maintained in the Administrators Office and have the following documents in their files - Admission Agreements, Identification & Emergency Information, current Physician's Report, Pre-admission appraisal/Appraisal Needs & Services Plan. Planned Activities: Residents at the facility are encouraged to engage in planned activities. LPA observed the Activity Schedule posted in the Dining Hall and toured the Activity Room, there was books, magazines, supplies for activities, board games and puzzles readily available for residents. The facility has a designated Activity Director. Food Service: The kitchen was observed for the ability to prepare and serve food. LPA observed an appropriate food supply of two (2) days of perishables and one week (7 days) of non-perishables. Incidental Medical & Dental: The facility provides assistance in meeting necessary medical and dental needs to the residents. Medications are centrally stored within the locked Medication Room and in their original containers. During the visit today, LPA reviewed 7 residents’ medications, no issues were observed. Disaster Preparedness: The facility has an Emergency Disaster Plan posted with contact numbers and at least 2 relocation sites. Facility maintains documentation of the required emergency drills. The facility does not have the required evacuation chairs at each stairwell, additional information documented on 809D. (continued on 809C) Residents with Special Health Needs: There is only one resident at the facility that utilizes services with Home Health and the facility is in communication with the agency to ensure the needs of resident are being met. The facility does not have any bedridden residents nor residents that have postural supports. LPA conducted 4 staff interviews and 5 resident interviews and reviewed 6 staff files and 6 resident files during today’s visit with no issues. Per California Code of Regulations, Title 22, and California Health and Safety Code, the deficiencies observed during the visit are documented on 809D. Exit interview was held and a copy of the report was provided Administrator Luisa Mascardothe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 21, 2023
What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedthere was not enough evidence to prove a violation occurred — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe evidence showed the allegation was false, could not have happened, or had no reasonable basisType A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗

An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents and the questions below stand in their place.

Life here

Rooms, meals, the rhythm of a day, faith and language, pets and house rules — as the home describes them. Tap any detail for its source and date; nothing here is graded.

The home has not described daily life anywhere we have reviewed yet — that is the case for most small homes, and it says nothing about the home. These questions fill in the picture; keep the ones that matter to you.

Before you call

Ask every home the same questions — the state’s record does not answer these. Keep the ones that matter and they travel with your saved homes.

  1. What is included in the monthly rate, and what costs extra?
  2. Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?
  3. Which rooms does the non-ambulatory approval cover, and what transfer support is provided?
  4. What could change whether someone can stay here?
  5. Can we see a bedroom and share a meal during a visit?

Other homes nearby

The nearest licensed homes in Los Angeles County, closest first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.

Explore Los Angeles County