Illustration — no photo of this home on file yet
Varenita of Simi Valley
Large community·Licensed for 110·Simi Valley, California
- Care approvals on fileWheelchair · Dementia · Hospice · BedriddenState licensing record · September 27, 2026
- Starting rate$4,874 a monthListed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026
- Home sizeLicensed for 110Large care community · a licensed care home (RCFE)
- Room at the last state visit74 of 110 beds occupiedDecember 16, 2025 · not a current opening
- Ways to payAsk the homeMedi-Cal ALW participation not on file
- Last state visitSeptember 3, 2026CDSS inspection record
Varenita of Simi Valley is a large care community in Simi Valley — a licensed residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE), the licence category behind “assisted living” and “board and care.” It is licensed for 110 residents since 2022.
Built from CDSS public records · September 27, 2026. Every fact below names its source and date.
Quick answers and the state record
A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.
Quick answers about Varenita of Simi Valley
Is Varenita of Simi Valley licensed?
The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
How many residents is Varenita of Simi Valley licensed for?
110 residents — a large community, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
Has Varenita of Simi Valley been cited?
3 Type A and 4 Type B citations since 2022, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. Those records count 32 state visits over the same years.
Is Varenita of Simi Valley still open?
This license was on the CDSS roster as of September 28, 2026.
What does Varenita of Simi Valley cost?
$4,874 a month to start — listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026.
The home lists this starting rate on Seniorly, seen September 9, 2026.
Among 20 other homes of a similar licensed size across Ventura County that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $3,962 to $4,995 a month, and the middle figure is $4,585 (n = 20 other homes publishing a starting rate).
Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.
A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.
The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.
A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.
Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
Does Varenita of Simi Valley take Medi-Cal?
On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
Who holds the license?
The license is held by Simi Val Srlv Ctr, Svslc Deg LLC; Sunrise Sr Lvng, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. See the homes licensed to Sunrise Sr Lvng — at least 2 on the state roster.
Is there a hospital nearby?
Adventist Health Simi Valley is 1.7 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.
Can Varenita of Simi Valley keep a resident on hospice?
Hospice care is approved on this license, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
Varenita of Simi Valley license and inspection record
- Name on the license: “VARENITA OF SIMI VALLEY”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
- License #567610007. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
- Licensed for 110 residents — a large community, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
- Licensed to Simi Val Srlv Ctr, Svslc Deg LLC; Sunrise Sr Lvng, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
- First licensed in 2022, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
- 32 state inspection visits since 2022, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
- 3 Type A and 4 Type B citations on file since 2022, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. The same records count 32 state visits in that period.
- 12 complaints and 8 substantiated allegations on file since 2022, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
- The most recent state visit on file is September 3, 2026, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗
Can they support the care needed?
California licenses a home for specific kinds of care. The state’s record lists what this home is approved for; the home’s own answers fill in what changes as needs change.
- Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved · covers up to 110 residents
- Dementia / memory careApproved by the state
- Hospice careApproved by the state
- BedriddenApproved · covers up to 10 residents
State licensing record · September 27, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.
Read the state’s own wording
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 110 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 10 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN IN ANY ROOM. APPROVED FOR DELAYED EGRESS. HOSPICE WAIVER INCREASE APPROVED FROM 10 TO 15 HOSPICE RESIDENTS. NEW MGT COMPANY, SUNRISE SENIOR LIVING MANAGEMENT, INC. EFFECTIVE 5/1/25.
983 - RCFE / DEMENTIA
CDSS record, verbatim · September 27, 2026
As needs change
- Medicines
Level of medication service: reminders only
Ask: “Who manages the medicines, and what happens when a dose is missed?”
caring.com · 2026-09-09
- Staying through hospice
Hospice waiver on file — care may continue at the end of life
Ask: “If hospice is needed, can care continue here until the end?”
State licensing record · September 27, 2026
- If memory loss develops
Dementia-care designation on file
Ask: “Can we read the dementia care disclosure and discuss how daily support works?”
State licensing record · September 27, 2026
2 more questions to ask the home
- Two-person transfers or a lift
Not on file
Ask: “If two people or a lift are needed to transfer, can the person stay?”
- Someone awake overnight
Not on file
Ask: “Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?”
Care & day-to-day support
These are the home’s own statements about its day-to-day practice — they are not part of the state licensing record, and the state has not approved or reviewed them.
Respite / short-term stays
Reported on seniorly.com · source dated July 24, 2026.
Help with bathing or showering
Reported on seniorly.com · source dated July 24, 2026.
Assistance with transfers
Reported on seniorly.com · source dated July 24, 2026.
Level of medication serviceReminders only
Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.
Therapies availablePhysical therapy
Reported on seniorly.com · source dated July 24, 2026.
Diabetic / carbohydrate-controlled diet
Reported on seniorly.com · source dated July 24, 2026.
Parkinson's care experience
Reported on seniorly.com · source dated July 24, 2026.
Incontinence care
Reported on seniorly.com · source dated July 24, 2026.
Renal diet
Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.
Low-sodium or cardiac diet available
Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.
Works with hospice
Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.
Help with dressing and grooming
Reported on seniorly.com · source dated July 24, 2026.
Building is wheelchair accessible
Reported on seniorly.com · source dated July 24, 2026.
Medication management
Reported on seniorly.com · source dated July 24, 2026.
Works with residents’ own health care providers
Reported on seniorly.com · source dated July 24, 2026.
Diabetes care
Reported on seniorly.com · source dated July 24, 2026.
Pharmacy services on site
Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.
Preventive health screenings
Reported on seniorly.com · source dated July 24, 2026.
Nights & staffing
24-hour supervision claimed
Reported on seniorly.com · source dated July 24, 2026.
Emergency call system
Reported on seniorly.com · source dated July 24, 2026.
What it costs here
This home’s starting rate
$4,874a month to start
Listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026 · See listing
Likely monthly total
$4,874a month
Likely $4,874–$5,474
With a studio and basic help.
An estimate for planning, not a quote. The price is made in the phone call.
See the full cost breakdownRoom, care and fees · how people pay · where the price comes from
Starting monthly rate$4,874this home
The home lists this starting rate on Seniorly, seen September 9, 2026.
Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600
Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (45 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).
One-time move-in fee$2,000one time · likely $0–$4,000
Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,000 (134 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.
- Likely monthly totalLikely $4,874–$5,474
- $4,874
- First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $4,874–$9,000
- $6,874
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
- Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
- Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
- SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
- VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
- Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
- MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
- The care level
Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.
- What is billed separately
Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.
- Move-in costs
A one-time community fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.
- Increases
California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.
- What is the full monthly cost for the room and care we need, and what does it include?
- What would the next care level cost, and who decides when it changes?
- What is billed separately, and is there a one-time fee or deposit at move-in?
- Is any private-pay period required before another payment program can begin?
How this estimate worksWhere this price comes from
The home lists this starting rate on Seniorly, seen September 9, 2026.
11 homes like this within 10 miles publish starting rates mostly between $3,850–$5,750.
- Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
- Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
- Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
- Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
- We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
- It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Show the 11 nearby homes behind this estimate
- Oakmont of Simi ValleySimi Valley · 1.4 mi · Large community$4,795Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Vista at Simi ValleySimi Valley · 2.7 mi · Large community$3,885Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Ivy Park at Simi ValleySimi Valley · 4.1 mi · Large community$4,395Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Fairwinds - West HillsWest Hills · 6.6 mi · Large community$5,025Listed on Seniorly · assisted living studio · seen September 9, 2026
- Laurel HeightsMoorpark · 8.4 mi · Large community$3,995Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- The Reserve at Thousand OaksThousand Oaks · 9.3 mi · Large community$3,780Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Meadowbrook at Agoura HillsAgoura Hills · 9.4 mi · Large community$4,195Listed on Seniorly · assisted living studio · seen September 9, 2026
- The Village at NorthridgeNorthridge · 9.5 mi · Large community$7,600Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Belmont Village CalabasasCalabasas · 9.5 mi · Large community$6,725Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- The Variel of Woodland HillsWoodland Hills · 9.8 mi · Large community$7,900Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- The Ridge at Westlake VillageWestlake Village · 10.0 mi · Large community$5,795Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
Where it is
- 3921 Cochran Street, Simi Valley, CA 93063Address from the public record · September 27, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.
Opening the neighborhood map…
The state record
California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. Here are the dated documents and the state’s own words, beside what is typical for homes this size.
Since 2022, the state has filed 28 documents for this home, and its records count 32 visits since 2022. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated May 11, 2026.
- On file since
- 2022
- State visits
- 32
- Most recent visit
- September 3, 2026
- Occupied · December 16, 2025 visit
- 74 of 110 bedsa count on that day, not an opening
We hold 13 complaint reports the state published for this home, dated September 26, 2022 to December 16, 2025. 13 of the 13 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (4), “Unsubstantiated” (9). 13 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word. Summary composed by computer from the 13 complaint reports below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.
Beside homes the same size
- Type A citations3typical 0
- Type B citations4typical 1
- Substantiated allegations8typical 2
- Total complaints12typical 6
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,354 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this licence since 2022.
Year by year
The last 36 months — 19 of 28 documents
May 11, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Legal/Non-compliance
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Martha Arroyo conducted an unannounced case management – legal/non-compliance visit. The purpose of today’s visit was to ensure the facility is maintaining substantial compliance. Upon arrival, the LPA met with the Resident Care Director (RCD), Cassandra Sadowsky, and the reason for the visit was explained. The LPA conducted a plant tour with the RCD and focused today’s visit on ensuring there are no health and safety hazards and facility is in compliance with Title 22 Regulations. Starting at 02:25 p.m., ten (10) randomly selected resident bedrooms were observed. The LPA inspected eight (8) bedrooms in Assisted Living and two (2) bedrooms in Memory Care. All bedrooms were observed to be properly furnished and had sufficient lighting. Hot water temperatures in Assisted Living bathrooms measured between 113.9 and 118.2 degrees Fahrenheit. In Memory Care bathrooms, hot water temperatures measured between 115.3 and 117.0 degrees Fahrenheit at the time of the visit. At the time of the visit, common area furniture was observed to be in good condition. The facility maintained a comfortable temperature. Several fire extinguishers were observed throughout the facility, all fully charged and with a service date of 12/05/2025. The facility’s Annual Fire Alarm Inspection was conducted on 12/11/2025 with no discrepancies noted. Required postings were observed throughout the common areas. The facility includes a courtyard which was observed to have adequate patio furniture for resident use. All interior and exterior passageways were observed to be free of obstructions. The kitchen and food service area were inspected during today’s visit. The LPA observed sufficient perishable and non-perishable foods to meet the minimum two-day and seven-day supply of food and water. An adequate amount of emergency food and water was observed during today’s visit. Exit interview conducted. Report was reviewed and copy was issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 11, 2026
Mar 3, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Incident
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Martha Arroyo conducted a Case Management - Incident visit to follow up on a self-reported incident which took place on 02/25/2026. Upon arrival the LPA met with Executive Director (ED), Helen Lee and explained the reason for the visit. Entrance interview conducted. On 02/26/2026, the Department received an incident report (LIC 624) and SOC 341 regarding Resident #1 (R1) reporting to concierge at approximately 12:00 p.m., that Resident #2 (R2) had hit them in the face yesterday (02/25/2026) at lunch time in the dining room. Report states that incident was reported by R1 and was unwitnessed by any staff member. During today’s visit, between approximately 9:20 a.m. and 11:30 a.m., the LPA conducted interviews with the ED and three residents and reviewed and obtained copies of pertinent documents. No immediate health and safety concerns were observed during today’s visit. Interviews revealed that R1 reported the incident to the concierge the day after the alleged incident. R1 stated that R2 had been calling them names for several weeks. R1 reported feeling tired of hearing R2 call them names and stated that they stood up and placed both hands in front of R2. According to R1, R2 then slapped them in the face with an open palm. Report Continued on LIC 809C... Report Continued from LIC 809... An interview with R2 revealed that they only referred to R1 as the name of the city they were from. R2 stated that when R1 raised their hands in front of their face, their reaction was to push R1 away. R2 denied calling R1 any other names. R2 also denied hitting R1 in the face and expressed regret for anything that may have occurred that day. An interview with another resident, who is a mutual friend of both R1 and R2, revealed that although R2 may occasionally make rude comments to others, they have never witnessed R2 behave aggressively toward anyone while residing at the facility. The ED stated that they checked R1 for any visible marks or redness; however, no signs of injury or redness were observed on R1’s face the following day. Additionally, the police report indicated that R1 had no visible injuries and that their dentures were not damaged. Furthermore, record review and interviews revealed that there were no witnesses to the alleged incident. The ED reported conducting an internal investigation, following proper reporting protocols, and taking steps to ensure that R1 continues to feel safe within the facility. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not sufficient evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur. No citations issued at this time. Exit interview conducted. Report was reviewed and a copy provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 3, 2026
Jan 15, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs), Martha Arroyo and Brian Balisi conducted an unannounced annual inspection today. Upon arrival, the LPAs met with Executive Director (ED) Helen Lee and the reason for the visit was explained. Entrance interview. Starting at 10:30am, the LPAs along with the ED, toured the physical plant areas inside and outside to ensure there are no health and safety hazards and facility is in compliance with Title 22 Regulations. The following was observed: Kitchen: Facility dining room and commercial kitchen were inspected and found to be in compliance with Title 22 regulations. The LPAs observed sufficient perishable and non-perishable foods to meet the minimum two-day and seven-day supply of food and water. Refrigerator and food pantry were checked for proper labels and expiration dates and food labels had expiration date clearly marked. An adequate amount of emergency food and water was observed; properly stored. Resident Rooms / Restrooms: The LPAs observed six (6) resident rooms in the assisted living side and two (2) resident rooms in memory care. All resident rooms were furnished appropriately, with clean linens and appropriate furnishings. The bathrooms were sufficiently stocked with supplies and paper towels. Starting at 10:39am, the hot water temperature was measured in eight (8) resident bathrooms, and the temperature measured between 112.9 – 118.8 degrees Fahrenheit. Report Continued on LIC 809C... Report Continued from LIC 809... Common Areas: The LPAs observed common areas to be clean and in good condition. There are games and/or activity supplies in the activity rooms as well as throughout the facility. There was sufficient space to accommodate both indoor and outdoor activities. The facility maintained a comfortable temperature. Required postings were observed throughout the common space. The LPAs observed stairwells to have emergency evacuation chairs. There were no obstructions and/or tripping hazards throughout the facility. Emergency exiting plans/sketch are posted throughout the facility. Several fire extinguisher are located throughout the facility and were observed to be fully charged and last serviced on 12/06/2025. Outdoor Space: The LPAs observed the outdoor garden in Assisted Living and Memory Care which had shaded seating areas for resident use. All passageways were observed to be clear and free of hazards. Record Review: The LPAs reviewed seven (7) resident records and seven (7) staff records starting at 11:31am. Resident files were reviewed for, but not limited to, the following: signed admission agreements, current medical assessments with TB results, Consent for Treatment form, and current needs and services plan. All records were in order. Personnel files including the current Executive Director’s file were reviewed for, but not limited to: personnel records, health assessments with TB results, criminal record clearances, first aid/CPR training, and the appropriate yearly training. All files were in order. During today’s visit, the LPAs conducted interviews with five (5) staff and two (2) residents. No concerns were noted. Report Continued on LIC 809C... Report Continued from LIC 809C... Medication Review: The LPAs reviewed medications at approximately 12:10pm. Medications are centrally stored in the medication room on the 2nd floor. The LPAs reviews six (6) randomly selected resident’s centrally stored medications. Medications were properly documented on the centrally stored medication & destruction record and appear to be given as prescribed at the time of the inspection. During today’s visit, the LPAs reviewed the facility's infection control policy as well as their emergency disaster plan. The facility’s policies and procedures as they pertain to infection control are adequate. Daily vehicle inspection list were reviewed for facility vehicles. The last fire safety inspection was completed on 12/02/2025 and was found to be in compliance with Fire Code Regulations at the time of inspections. Emergency disaster drills conducted quarterly as per regulation; last disaster drill conducted on 12/10/2025. No citations issued. Exit interview conducted. Report was reviewed and copy provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 15, 2026
Dec 16, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Residents are not being given 90 days written notice for an increase in rates.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Martha Arroyo conducted an initial complaint investigation for the allegation listed above. Upon arrival, the LPA met with met with Executive Director (ED), Helen Lee and explained the reason for the visit. Entrance interview. During today's visit, the LPA conducted interviews with one staff member and five residents and obtained copies of pertinent documents relevant to the investigation. Report Continued on LIC 9099C... Unsubstantiated Report Continued from LIC 9099... It was alleged that residents are not being given 90 days written notice for an increase in rates. It is the complainant’s concern that the letter of increase was received in the first week on November; however, the increased rate is to take in effect on the first of the year. Record review and interviews conducted revealed that the facility issued written notices to all residents whose level of care was affected by the rate increase. The LPA obtained and reviewed a copy of the notice, dated 11/01/2025, which stated that the new service rates would be effective 02/01/2026. Interviews with facility staff revealed that following a change in management, resident care plans were reviewed, and it was determined that several residents were receiving services that were not reflected in their current care plans. As a result, care plans were updated to accurately reflect the appropriate level of care and corresponding fees. Interviews with residents revealed that they received written notice of the rate increase in their mailboxes. Four out of four residents interviewed confirmed receiving the notice in early November. Furthermore, residents interviewed did not express or report any concerns regarding insufficient notice of the rate increase. Based on the information obtained and reviewed, the Department has insufficient evidence to support the allegation of “residents are not being given 90 days written notice for an increase in rates”. Therefore, this allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. Exit interview conducted. A copy of the report was issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 16, 2025 · control 29-AS-20251208151834
Oct 7, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Legal/Non-compliance
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Martha Arroyo conducted an unannounced cased management – legal/non-compliance visit. The purpose of today’s visit was to ensure the facility is maintaining substantial compliance. Upon arrival, the LPA met with Interim Executive Director (IED), Melon Rivera and the reason for the visit was explained. During today’s visit, the LPA along with the IED toured the physical plant areas inside and outside to ensure there are no health and safety hazards and facility is in compliance with Title 22 Regulations. Starting at 11:19 a.m., nine (9) randomly selected resident bedrooms were observed. The LPA inspected five (5) bedrooms in Assisted Living and four (4) bedrooms in Memory Care. All bedrooms were observed to be properly furnished and had sufficient lighting. Hot water temperatures in Assisted Living bathrooms measured between 105.2 and 113.1 degrees Fahrenheit. In Memory Care bathrooms, hot water temperatures measured between 107.2 and 109.7 degrees Fahrenheit at the time of the visit. Memory Care bathrooms were also observed to have locked cabinets for residents’ personal hygiene items. Report Continued on LIC 809C... Report Continued from LIC 809... At the time of the visit, common area furniture was observed to be in good condition. The facility maintained a comfortable temperature. Several fire extinguishers were observed throughout the facility, all fully charged and with a service date of 01/07/2025. The facility’s alarm signal system was tested on 01/15/2025 with no discrepancies noted. Required postings were observed throughout the common areas. Residents were observed participating in activities during the visit. The facility includes a courtyard which was observed to have adequate patio furniture for resident use. All interior and exterior passageways were observed to be free of obstructions. The kitchen and food service area were inspected at approximately 12:05 p.m. Emergency food supplies were observed for appropriate labels and expiration dates. Several boxes of cereal were noted to be past their "best before" dates. However, the facility still has a sufficient supply of both perishable and non-perishable foods. Staff reported that an order of non-perishable food items is scheduled for delivery later this week. Exit interview conducted. Report was reviewed and copy was issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 7, 2025
Jul 24, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Legal/Non-compliance
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Martha Arroyo conducted an unannounced case management – legal/non-compliance visit. The purpose of today’s visit is to ensure the facility is maintaining substantial compliance. Upon arrival, the LPA met with Executive Director (ED), Margie Veis and the reason for the visit was explained. The LPA focused today’s visit on ensuring the Medications and Centrally Stored Medications and Destruction Records (CSMDR) are in order and in compliance with Title 22 Regulations. During today’s visit, the LPA conducted a medications review in assisted living starting at 09:50 a.m. and memory care starting at 10:40 a.m. A total of five (5) randomly selected residents’ medications and CSMDR were reviewed, and the following was noted: During the medication review, it was revealed that 3 out of 5 residents have routine medications that were started but are not documented on the CSMDR. Additionally, 2 out of 5 residents have medications missing start dates on both the CSMDR and the corresponding start date sticker on medication, preventing the LPA from verifying whether the medications are being administered as prescribed. The review also revealed that Resident #1 (R1) is prescribed bedtime medications—Melatonin 3 mg tablet, one tablet at bedtime as needed, and Carbamazepine 200 mg, half a tablet twice daily—both with a documented start date of 07/05/2025. However, each medication is missing one dosage, and there are no documented notes indicating that staff have observed the missing doses. Pursuant to Title 22, California Code of Regulations (CCR), the following deficiencies are cited (refer to LIC809-D). Exit interview conducted. A copy of report and appeal rights were provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 24, 2025
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87465(a)(4) · Plan of correction due date: Aug 1, 2025
(4) The licensee shall assist residents with self-administered medications as needed. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on medication review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above as R1's medications Melatonin 3mg and Carbamazepine 200 mg each missing one extra dose, which poses an immediate health and safety risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 24, 2025
Plan of correction: The Licensee has agreed to have an in-house training on properly administering medications to residents and submit proof to CCL no later than POC due date.
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR87465(h)(6)(A-F) · Plan of correction due date: Aug 1, 2025
The licensee shall be responsible for assuring that a record of centrally stored prescription medications for each resident is maintained for at least one year and includes: name of resident, physician, drug name, strength, quantity, date filled, prescription number and the name of the issuing pharmacy. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on medication review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above as meds for 3 out of 5 residents were not documented on the CSMDR and meds for 2 out of 5 residents were missing start dates, which poses a potential health and safety risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 24, 2025
Plan of correction: The Licensee has agreed to have an in-house training on properly documenting medications on the CSMDR and submit proof to CCL no later than POC due date.
Apr 28, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Legal/Non-compliance
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Martha Arroyo conducted an unannounced case management – legal/non-compliance visit. The purpose of today’s visit is to ensure the facility is maintaining substantial compliance. Upon arrival, the LPA met with Executive Director (ED), Margie Veis and the reason for the visit was explained. The LPA focused today’s visit on ensuring records are in order and in compliance with Title 22 Regulations. During today’s visit, the LPA conducted a records review of ten (10) resident files and ten (10) personnel files. The following was noted: Resident files were reviewed for, but not limited to the following: signed admissions agreement, current medical assessment with TB results, consent for treatment form, and current needs and service plan. All files were complete. Personnel files were reviewed for, but not limited to the following: personnel records, health assessment with TB results, criminal record clearances, first aid / cpr certifications, and the appropriate yearly training. All files were complete. No deficiencies issued. Exit interview conducted. Report was reviewed and copy was issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 28, 2025
Jan 27, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Martha Arroyo and Valeria Conway conducted an unannounced annual inspection. Upon arrival, the LPAs met with Executive Director (ED), Margie Veis and explained the reason for the visit. Entrance interview conducted. Beginning at 10:10am, the LPAs started reviewing records which included the facility's infection control policy as well as the emergency disaster plan. The facility’s policies and procedures as it pertains to infection control are adequate. The last fire safety inspection was completed on 01/15/2025 and was found to be in compliance with Fire Code Regulations at the time of inspections. Emergency disaster drills conducted quarterly as per regulation; the last one being a fire drill on 12/31/2024. Beginning at 11:15am, the LPAs along with the Executive Director, toured the physical plant areas inside and outside to ensure there are no health and safety hazards and facility is in compliance with Title 22 Regulations. The following was observed: RESIDENT ROOMS/RESTROOMS: The LPAs observed five resident rooms and their accompanying restrooms were observed during today's facility tour. All resident rooms were furnished appropriately, with clean linens and appropriate furnishings. The bathrooms were sufficiently stocked with supplies and paper towels. Beginning at 11:30am, the hot water temperature was measured in four assisted living bathrooms and one memory care bathroom, and the temperature measured between 113.4 – 118.4 degrees Fahrenheit. Report Continued on LIC 809C... Report Continued from LIC 809... KITCHEN: Facility dining room and commercial kitchen were inspected and found to be in compliance with Title 22 regulations. The LPAs observed sufficient perishable and non-perishable foods to meet the minimum two-day and seven-day supply of food and water. Refrigerator and food pantry were checked for proper labels and expiration dates and food labels had expiration date clearly marked. COMMON AREAS: The LPAs observed common areas to be clean and in good condition. The facility maintained a comfortable temperature. Required postings were observed throughout the common space. The LPAs observed stairwells to have emergency evacuation chairs. There were no obstructions and/or tripping hazards throughout the facility. Emergency exiting plans/sketch are posted throughout the facility. Several fire extinguisher are located throughout the facility and were observed to be fully charged and last serviced on 1/07/2025. The LPAs observed hand sanitizer stations throughout the facility. OUTDOOR SPACE: The LPAs observed the outdoor garden in Assisted Living and Memory Care which had shaded seating areas for resident use. All passageways were observed to be clear and free of hazards. RECORD REVIEW: The LPAs reviewed resident and staff records beginning at 12:35pm. Ten resident files were reviewed for, but not limited to, the following: signed admission agreements, current medical assessments with TB results, Consent for Treatment form, and current needs and services plan. All records were in order. Ten personnel files including the current Executive Director’s file were reviewed for, but not limited to: personnel records, health assessments with TB results, criminal record clearances, first aid/CPR training, and the appropriate yearly training. Three out of ten staff files reviewed did not have up to date yearly training and Staff 1 (S1) was fingerprint cleared but not associated to the facility. Report Continued on LIC 809C... Report Continued from LIC 809C... MEDICATION REVIEW: Beginning at 12:00pm, the LPAs reviewed medications for five residents. The medications are centrally stored in the medication room on the second floor. All medications including PRNs were labeled, stored, and locked inaccessible to residents in care. PRNs have physicians order on file. Medications are properly documented on the centrally stored medications and destruction record. Medications appear to be given as prescribed. Pursuant to Title 22, California Code of Regulations (CCR), the following deficiencies are cited (refer to LIC809-D). Exit interview conducted. A copy of report and appeal rights were provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 27, 2025
Sep 17, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Legal/Non-compliance
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Martha Arroyo conducted an unannounced cased management – legal/non-compliance visit. The purpose of today’s visit was to ensure the facility is maintaining substantial compliance. LPA met with Executive Director (ED), Margie Veis and the reason for the visit was explained. The LPA focused today’s visit on ensuring there are no health and safety hazards, and the facility is in compliance with Title 22 Regulations. During today’s visit, the LPA along with the ED and Maintenance Director conducted a walk through of the facility at 1:35pm. Five (5) randomly selected resident bedrooms were observed. Resident rooms were observed to be furnished appropriately with sufficient lighting. Resident bathrooms were sufficiently stocked with supplies and paper towels. Hot water temperature was measured in three (3) bedrooms in assisted living; and two (2) bedrooms in memory care. Water temperature measured within 105- and 120-degrees Fahrenheit. Fire extinguishers were observed throughout the facility fully charged on 01/16/2024. The facility has a sufficient supply of perishable and non-perishable food. No obstructions or hazards were observed inside or out. Additionally, the LPA and ED discussed the new resident Admissions Agreement and Assessment Tool submitted to CCL as it needs to be updated to meet Title 22 Regulations. No deficiencies issued. Exit interview conducted. Report was reviewed and copy was issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 17, 2024
Aug 29, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff is mishandling the residents incontinence needs while in care Staff are not meeting the residents dental needs Staff are not meeting the residents hygiene needs
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Brian Balisi conducted an unannounced subsequent visit to continue investigation for the allegations listed above. Upon arrival LPA met with Nancy Nelson and explained the reason for the visit. On 07/26/2024, from 10:00 a.m. – 02:45 p.m., LPA initiated an unannounced complaint investigation for the allegations listed above. During the visit, LPA toured the physical plant, interviewed staff as well as reviewed and obtained pertinent documents relevant to the investigation. Today LPA conducted physical plant and interviewed staff. It was reported that "Staff is mishandling the residents incontinence needs while in care", as it was alleged that there is insufficient supply of incontinent products. Interviews conducted with eleven (11) staff revealed that all (11) have always seen a sufficient supply of incontinence products available. During a physical plant, the LPA found a proper supply of these products in six randomly selected resident rooms in memory care, as well as in a supply closet next to the medication room, the memory care director's office, and a supply closet on the 2nd floor. Unsubstantiated LPA's interview with five (5) families / responsible parties of residents in care revealed that all (5) did not express any potential or immediate concerns that the facility are not meeting the incontinence needs of residents in care. Based on the information obtained during the investigation, the Department does not have sufficient evidence to corroborate the allegation. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the above allegation, “Staff is mishandling the residents incontinence needs while in care” is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. It was reported that "staff are not meeting the residents dental needs" as it was alleged that staff are not ensuring residents are brushing their teeth. Interviews conducted with eleven (11) staff revealed that most residents need some type of assistance with brushing their teeth by either reminding them or fully assisting them with brushing. Interviews with staff further revealed that all (11) have not observed a resident who didn't brush their teeth for a prolonged period of time. Each staff interviewed also did not express any potential or immediate concerns for any staff not assisting resident with brushing their teeth. LPA's interview with five (5) families / responsible parties of residents in care revealed that all (5) did not express any potential or immediate concerns that the facility staff are not meeting resident dental needs. Based on the information obtained during the investigation, the Department does not have sufficient evidence to corroborate the allegation. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the above allegation, “Staff are not meeting the residents dental needs” is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. It was reported that "Staff are not meeting the residents hygiene needs", as it is alleged that residents are not showered in a timely manner. Interviews conducted with eleven (11) staff revealed that most residents usually receive showers 2 to 3 times a week and require some type of assistance according to their care plans. Assistance could involve either reminders or encourage, standby assist, hands on and full assist. All (11) staff also stated they have never seen a resident miss a shower or be delayed in getting one. LPA's interview with five (5) families / responsible parties of residents in care revealed that all (5) did not express any potential or immediate concerns that facility staff are not meeting resident hygiene needs. Based on the information obtained during the investigation, the Department does not have sufficient evidence to corroborate the allegation. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the above allegation, “Staff are not meeting the residents hygiene needs” is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. Exit interview conducted and copy of report issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 29, 2024 · control 29-AS-20240724111333
Aug 29, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Facility does not have adequate supplies Staff did not meet residents’ diapering needs
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Brian Balisi conducted an unannounced subsequent visit to continue investigation for the allegations listed above. Upon arrival LPA met with Nancy Nelson and explained the reason for the visit. On 08/02/2024, from 12:00 p.m. – 02:45 p.m., LPA’s Brian Balisi and Trevor Byrne initiated an unannounced complaint investigation for the allegations listed above. During the visit, LPAs toured the physical plant, interviewed staff as well as reviewed and obtained pertinent documents relevant to the investigation. It was reported that "Facility does not have adequate supplies" as it was alleged that they have an insufficient PPE supply. Interviews conducted with eleven (11) staff revealed that all (11) have always observed a sufficient supply of PPE. During physical plant, LPA observed a sufficient supply of PPE located in a supply closet next to the medication room in memory care, in the memory care director's office, in the Executive Director's office, a supply closet on the 2nd floor and at the front desk receptionist area Unsubstantiated Continued from 9099 LPA's interview with five (5) families / responsible parties of residents in care revealed that all (5) did not express any potential or immediate concerns that the facility did not have an adequate supply of PPE. Based on the information obtained during the investigation, the Department does not have sufficient evidence to corroborate the allegation. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the above allegation, “Facility does not have adequate supplies” is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. It was reported that "Staff did not meet residents' diapering needs", as it was alleged that diapers that were used were too small for most residents and it left marks. Interviews conducted with eleven (11) staff revealed that all (11) have always observed residents using the correct size of diapers and all (11) stated they have never observed any diapers leave marks on any residents. LPA's interview with five (5) families / responsible parties of residents in care revealed that all (5) did not express any potential or immediate concerns of incontinent being too small and leaving marks on the residents. Based on the information obtained during the investigation, the Department does not have sufficient evidence to corroborate the allegation. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the above allegation, “Staff did not meet residents’ diapering needs” is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. Exit interview conducted and copy of report issued. Continued from 9099-A LPA's interview with Executive Director Margie Veis revealed that on August 9, before using the test kits they contacted Ventura Public Health to inform them of the expiration dates. Ventura County Public Health advised them to contact the manufacturer of the Flowflex COVID test kit, ACON Labs Inc. Interview with Veis further revealed that they spoke with a representative of ACON Labs Inc and informed them of the expiration date of 02/22/2023 and Veis stated that the representative told them the test kits are still good for two (2) years. Facility staff proceeded to use test kit on one resident, which resulted in a positive test. Upon further research facility staff observed the LOT# (COV2020158) on the Food and Drug Administration (FDA)'s website, which confirmed that the COVID test kits expired in February 2024 based on the Lot # and expiration date. Veis called manufacturer back to gain clarification on the discrepancies and the representative informed them that expiration is 2 years from manufacturing date versus the expiration date. Staff immediately discarded their current supply of COVID test kits and obtained new ones from Ventura County Public Health. LPA's interview with representatives from ACON Labs Inc., the maker of the Flowflex COVID test kit, revealed that the test kits with the specific LOT # should not have been used after February 2024, as their results would be invalid. LPA also reviewed records from the FDA's website, which confirmed that the COVID test kit (LOT#COV2020158) expired in February 2024. Based on information gathered over the course of the investigation, the Department has sufficient evidence to determine the allegation occurred. Therefore, the allegations that “Staff used expired COVID tests to test residents” has been deemed Substantiated at this time. Pursuant to Title 22, California Code of Regulations, the following deficiency is cited (refer to LIC9099-D). Exit interview conducted, appeal rights discussed, and a copy of this report issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 29, 2024 · control 29-AS-20240729092217
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87468.1(a)(2) · Plan of correction due date: Sep 6, 2024
Personal Rights of Residents in All Facilities ...To be accorded safe, healthful and comfortable accommodations, furnishings and equipment. This requirement was not met as evidenced by Based on observations and interviews, the Licensee did not comply with the section cited above, as expired COVID test kits were used to test residents, which poses a potential personal rights risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 29, 2024
Plan of correction: POC cleared during visit. Licensee has discarded expired test kits and LPA observed new COVID test kits in storage. No further action required.
Jun 28, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff are not following physician's orders for the resident
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Brian Balisi conducted a subsequent complaint visit to investigate the allegations listed above. Upon arrival LPA met with Executive Director Margie Veis and explained the reason for the visit. During the initial visit on 6/11/2024, between 1:50 p.m. and 4:00 p.m. LPA conducted physical plant, interviewed staff, resident and reviewed obtained pertinent documentation relevant to the investigation. Today LPA interviewed staff and reviewed and obtained additional documentation relevant to the investigation. It was reported that "Staff are not following physician's orders for the resident" as it was alleged that staff are not using a waist belt on Resident #1 (R1)'s wheelchair as prescribed. Interviews conducted and records review reflected on 04/13/2024 at approx. 5pm, R1 sustained a fall in their apartment , which resulted in R1 getting admitted into a local hospital. Unsubstantiated Continued from 9099 On 05/02/2024, R1 was discharged from the hospital into a Skilled Nursing Facility. On 05/09/2024, R1 returned to the facility. On 05/21/2024, R1's POA obtained a physician's order to "use a waist belt restraint as needed to prevent falling out of chair" , from a physician at the Skilled Nursing Facility. Facility did not use a waist belt as it was not compliant with Title 22. In addition, R1' s Primary Care Physician did not provide a physician's order to make use of waist belt at this facility. Based on the information obtained during the investigation, the Department does not have sufficient evidence to corroborate the allegation. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the above allegation, “Staff are not following physician's orders for the resident” is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. Exit interview conducted and copy of report issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 28, 2024 · control 29-AS-20240604133653
Mar 22, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff increased resident fees without providing new additional services.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Martha Arroyo conducted a subsequent complaint visit to the above facility. The purpose of the visit is to deliver findings for the above allegation. The initial visit was conducted on 03/04/2024 by LPA M. Arroyo. On today's visit, LPA Arroyo met with Executive Director (ED), Margie Veis. Entrance interview. During the initial visit on 03/04/2024, LPA Arroyo conducted an interview with the ED at 1:50 p.m., conducted a file review at 2:30 p.m., and obtained copies of pertinent documents relevant to the investigation. Continued on LiC 9099C... Substantiated Continued from LIC 9099C... It was alleged that staff increased resident fees without providing new additional services. It was reported that no additional services have been added to justify the increase in resident fee. Records review revealed that residents who were assed prior to being admitted to the facility as independent were not charged any additional fees as they required no additional services already being provided in the basic monthly fee. Additionally, residents did not require assistance with any activities of daily living (ADL’s) including medication management. A review of random resident admission agreements revealed that five (5) out of five (5) admission agreements did not have an updated admissions agreement disclosing the rate change. Although the facility submitted a change of Assessment Tool, Structure of Level of Care Levels and Resident Agreements on 03/09/2023, residents who are scheduled to have an increase in resident fees by April 2024 have yet to sign an Addendum to current admissions agreement or an updated admissions agreement that reflects new information pertaining to the Structure of Level of Care Levels. Furthermore, residents received a letter from the facility corroborating the statement that no additional services will be provided to residents following the fee increase in April 2024. Based on the information obtained and reviewed, the allegation of, “staff increased resident fees without providing new additional services” is being deemed Substantiated at this time. The following deficiencies were observed (See LIC 9099-D.) and cited from the California Code of Regulations, Title 22 and California Health and Safety Code. Failure to correct the deficiencies may result in civil penalties. Exit interview conducted. A copy of the report and appeal rights were provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 22, 2024 · control 29-AS-20240229150859
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: HSC 1569.655 · Plan of correction due date: Mar 27, 2024
(a)If a licensee of a residential care facility for the elderly increases the rates of fees for residents or makes increases in any of its rate structures for services, the licensee shall provide no less than 60 days' prior written notice to the residents or the residents' representatives setting forth the amount ... of the increase, the reason for the increase, and a general description of the additional costs, except for an increase in the rate due to a change in the level of care of the resident.... This requirement is not met as evidenced by:the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 22, 2024
Plan of correction: The Licensee will review regulation and submit a written letter certifying that, moving forward, they will ensure to follow and adhere to Health & Safety Code 1569.655(a); The written letter must be sent to the LPA by the POC due date. Based on record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above as the resident’s admissions agreement are not updated or have an addendum on file that reflects residents new structure of level of care levels as stated on plan of operation, which poses a potential personal rights risk to persons in care.
Mar 14, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Other
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Martha Arroyo conducted an unannounced case management – other visit at 9:00 a.m. The purpose of this visit is to obtain pertinent information regarding an incident that occurred on 01/01/2024. Upon arrival, LPA met with the Marketing Director. The Executive Director (ED), Margie Veis, arrived during the visit. Entrance Interview. During today’s visit, LPA Arroyo met with one staff member at 9:18 a.m., conducted a record review, and obtained copies of pertinent documents. Exit interview conducted. Report was reviewed and a copy was issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 14, 2024
Jan 18, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff speak to residents in an inappropriate manner. Staff does not provide a safe environment for residents. Staff are not properly trained to administer residents’ medications. Staff caused a resident to bleed. Staff eats resident's food. Staff inappropriately cleaned the dining room tables at the facility.
Licensing Program Analysts (LPA’s), Martha Arroyo and Brian conducted a subsequent visit to the facility to issue findings for the above allegations. The initial visit was conducted on 05/30/2023 and a subsequent visit was conducted on 06/08/2023 by LPA M. Arroyo. During today's visit, LPAs met with Executive Director, Margie Veis, and the reason for the visit was explained. Entrance interview. During the initial visit on 05/30/2023, at 1:45 p.m., LPA Arroyo conducted a tour of the facility to ensure there are no health and safety hazards, conducted interviews with seven staff, four residents, and one family member between 2:07 p.m. and 4:45 p.m., and conducted a file review at 3:50 p.m. and obtained copies of pertinent documents. On 06/08/2023, LPA Arroyo conducted interviews with the Executive Director and three staff between 9:32 a.m. and 10:00 a.m. and conducted a file review at 10:30 a.m. and obtained copies of pertinent documents. On 10/03/2023, LPA Arroyo conducted telephonic interviews with three family members at 10:25 a.m., 10:40 a.m., and 11:20 a.m. (Report Continued on LIC 9099C...) Unsubstantiated (Report Continued from LIC 9099...) It was alleged that staff speak to residents in an inappropriate manner and staff does not provide a safe environment for residents. It was reported that Staff #1 (S1) commands and disrespects the residents when talking and interacting and has at times used profanity words causing the resident to be in an unsafe environment. Interviews conducted with staff revealed that facility staff have not observed S1 speak inappropriately to residents in care. Additionally, staff denied observing or hearing any other facility staff mistreating residents. Interviews conducted with family members revealed that they have observed facility staff interact with residents while visiting, and all interactions have been of staff being gentle and respectful when assisting the residents. Also, family members stated they have seen how the staff interact with the residents and the staff were professional and caring. Furthermore, family members stated having no concerns and feel the residents are safe while living at the facility. Based on interviews conducted with staff and family members, the Department does not have sufficient evidence to support the allegations of “staff speak to residents in an inappropriate manner” and “staff does not provide a safe environment for residents”. Therefore, these allegations are deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. It was also alleged that staff are not properly trained to administer residents’ medications. It was reported that S1 has not completed the necessary training to be a medication technician and administer medication to residents. Interviews conducted with staff revealed that training is given to all staff upon hiring. Additionally, staff stated they are required to complete the online training assigned as well as the week of shadowing different staff members prior to being able to start providing care to residents. Records review revealed that facility now utilizes Care Academy as it transitioned to the new management; however, the facility was using the services provided from Relias. Nevertheless, the facility maintains copies of all completed training from their staff. Additionally, review of S1’s training folder revealed that S1 has completed sixty-five out of the sixty-seven training's listed under S1’s Care Staff Initial Training Curriculum. Furthermore, the training that has been completed include all the necessary training on assisting with the administration of medication and the hours from shadowing another care staff. Based on records review and interviews conducted, the Department does not have sufficient evidence to support the allegation of “staff are not properly trained to administer residents’ medications”. Therefore, this allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. (Report Continued on LIC 9099C...) (Report Continued from LIC 9099...) It was also alleged that staff caused a resident to bleed. It was reported that Staff #2 (S2) had popped a pimple on a resident while they slept. Interviews conducted with staff revealed that they strive to meet the residents’ basic needs. Additionally, staff stated they had no knowledge of the incident mentioned and denied seeing or hearing of other staff mistreating the residents. Interviews conducted with family members revealed that while visiting the facility, they have observed the staff be gentle and respectful when assisting the residents. Furthermore, family members reported having no concerns with the facility or the staff. Based on the information obtained and reviewed, the Department does not have sufficient evidence to support the allegation of “staff caused a resident to bleed”. Therefore, this allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. It was further alleged that staff eats resident’s food and staff inappropriately cleaned the dining room tables at the facility. It was reported that S2 has eaten the resident’s food and has been seen cleaning the dining room tables with the floor broom. Interviews with staff revealed that the maintenance director trains all staff in housekeeping at least once a month. The training is conducted with all staff on properly cleaning and maintaining the work area, which includes handling and storing chemicals as they are providing care inside the memory care unit. Additionally, staff stated that residents’ food does not get touched by the staff unless they are assisting the residents during their mealtimes. In addition, staff denied seeing S2 eating the resident’s food and cleaning the dining room tables inappropriately. Furthermore, interviews conducted with family members revealed they had no concerns about the facility staff. Based on the information obtained and reviewed, the Department does not have sufficient evidence to support the allegation of “staff eats residents’ food” and “staff inappropriately cleaned the dining room tables at the facility”. Therefore, these allegations are deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. Exit interview conducted. No citations issued at this time. A copy of the report was provided. (Report Continued from LIC 9099...) It was alleged that staff is under the influence at work. It was reported that several staff had observed Staff #2 (S2) display questionable actions and behavior while working at the facility and assisting residents. During the course of the investigation, it was revealed that S2 had admitted to being under the influence of marijuana while working as a care provider on 05/22/2023. Additionally, S2 provided photographs of the marijuana S2 was using while working. Furthermore, S2 was terminated August 2023 due to poor performance and not completing their job duties. Based on all information gathered during the course of the investigation in conjunction with CC# 29-AS-20230530092434 from 05/30/2023, the above allegation, “staff is under the influence at work” is deemed Substantiated at this time. Although the allegation was Substantiated. The department may prohibit any person from continuing employment if they have engaged in conduct that is inimical to the health, morals, welfare, or safety of either the people of this state or an individual in, or receiving services from, the facility… has already been cited on a previous visit from 12/04/2023. Exit interview conducted. Appeal rights and report were reviewed, and a copy was issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 18, 2024 · control 29-AS-20230522161041
Jan 18, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Incident
Licensing Program Analysts (LPA’s) Martha Arroyo and Brian Balisi conducted an unannounced case management visit to the above facility. The purpose of this visit is to conclude an investigation regarding an incident that occurred on 01/01/2024. Upon arrival, the LPAs met with Executive Director (ED), Margie Veis, and explained the reason for the visit. Entrance interview. On 01/02/2024, the Department received an incident report stating that on the morning of 01/01/2024, Staff #1 (S1) was assisting Resident #1 (R1) with dressing. R1 was resistant to care and became agitated. R1 slapped S1 across the face, causing S1’s glasses to fall off their face and in response, S1 slapped R1 across the face. Staff #2 (S2) witnessed the incident as they were inside the room assisting S1. During the initial visit on 01/05/2024, LPA Arroyo conducted a tour of the Memory Care Unit at 12:20 p.m., conducted interviews with the ED and two staff between 12:13 p.m. and 12:45 p.m., conducted a file review at 1:05 p.m., and obtained copies of pertinent documents relevant to the investigation. Information obtained during the course of the investigation revealed that R1 was agitated while being provided care by both S1 and S2. This resulted in R1 slapping S1 causing their glasses to fall from S1’s face. In response, S1 slapped R1 across the face. Interviews conducted revealed that S2 had seemed short tempered with the residents lately and S2 had reported to other staff that it was only a reaction that happened without thinking due to being slapped. (Report Continued on LIC 809C...) (Report Continued from LIC 809C...) However, staff stated observing S2 being slapped by other residents in the past but denied seeing any reaction from S2. In addition, both law enforcement and R1’s family were contacted and notified of the incident on the same day it occurred. Hospice was also notified shortly after the incident to come to the facility and educate the staff on how to deal with residents’ behaviors. Furthermore, S1 resigned from their position on their own following the incident. Based on the information obtained and reviewed, the Department has enough evidence to say that S1 slapped R1 while providing care. Per the California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8, the following deficiencies were observed and cited during the visit. Exit Interview conducted. Copy of report, and appeal rights provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 18, 2024
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87468.1(a)(1)(3) · Plan of correction due date: Jan 18, 2024
87468.1(a)(1)(3) Personal Rights of Residents in All Facilities (a)Residents in all residential care facilities for the elderly shall have all of the following personal rights: (1) To be accorded dignity in their personal relationships with staff… and to be free from... punishment, humiliation, intimidation, abuse, or other actions of a punitive nature… This requirement was not met as evidenced by:the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 18, 2024
Plan of correction: The Licensee has agreed to conduct an in-house training on residents’ personal rights and submit proof to CCL no later than 01/19/2024. Based on the information obtained and reviewed, the Licensee did not comply with the section cited above as S1 slapped R1 while providing care, which posed an immediate safety risk to residents in care.
Jan 18, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Martha Arroyo and Brian Balisi arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct a required annual visit at 9:30 a.m. Upon arrival, the LPAs were greeted by the front desk receptionist. The Executive Director (ED), Margie Veis met with LPAs shortly after and the reason for the visit was explained. Entrance interview conducted. The LPAs toured the physical plant areas inside and outside to ensure there are no health and safety hazards and facility is in compliance with Title 22 Regulations. The following was noted: KITCHEN: The LPAs inspected the kitchen/food service area at 10:08 a.m. Knives are stored and inaccessible to residents. Kitchen appliances were in operable condition. The facility has a sufficient supply of perishable and non-perishable food. Refrigerator and food pantry were checked for proper labels and expiration dates and food labels had expiration date clearly marked. COMMON AREAS: At the time of the visit, furniture in the common areas were observed to be in good condition. The facility maintained a comfortable temperature. Smoke detector(s) and carbon monoxide detector were tested and operational at the time of the visit. The fire extinguishers were fully charged and were last serviced 01/16/2024. The LPAs observed required postings throughout the common space. The LPAs observed the stairwells and they each had an emergency evacuation chair. Activity Rooms were observed and clean at the time of visit. The last fire inspection was completed on 12/27/2023 and was found to be in compliance with Fire Code Regulations at the time of inspection. Fire and earthquake drills conducted within the last 6 months as per regulation; the last one conducted 12/28/2023. (Report Continued on LIC 809C...) (Report Continued from LIC 809...) BEDROOMS: The LPAs observed three (3) random resident bedrooms in memory care and seven (7) random resident bedrooms in assisted living. All resident bedrooms were furnished appropriately with linens, appropriate furnishings, and sufficient lighting. The LPAs observed a sufficient supply of towels and linens. RESTROOMS: The LPAs observed ten (10) random resident restrooms during the inspection. All resident restrooms appeared clean and sanitary and in operating condition with grab bars and non-skid surfaces. The bathrooms were sufficiently stocked with supplies and paper towels. The hot water temperature was measured in seven (7) random assisted living bathrooms between 10:20 a.m. and 10:55 a.m., the temperature measured between 112.5 – 115 degrees Fahrenheit. Between 10:00 a.m. and 10:13 a.m., the hot water temperature was measured in three (3) random memory care bathrooms and the temperature measured between 112.7 – 115.3 degrees Fahrenheit. At approximately 10:50 a.m., the LPAs observed the emergency food supply, and a substantial amount of non-perishable items were in poor condition as they were observed past their expiration date. Staff discarded all expired items and ordered new items during the inspection. RECORDS: LPA’s reviewed Resident Records at 11:05 a.m. and Personnel Records at 12:02 p.m. Nine (9) resident files were reviewed for, but not limited to, the following: signed admission agreements, current medical assessments with TB results, LIC627(c) Consent for Treatment form, and current needs and services plan. All records were in order. Nine (9) personnel files and the current Executive Director’s file were reviewed for, but not limited to: personnel records, health assessments, criminal record clearances, first aid/CPR training, and the appropriate training. All records were in order. LPAs conducted interviews with six (6) staff and six (6) residents during the inspection. (Report Continued on LIC 809C...) (Report Continued from LIC 809C...) MEDICATIONS: Medications review began at approximately 12:15 p.m. The medications are centrally stored in the medication room on the second floor. All medications including PRNs were labeled, stored, and locked inaccessible to residents in care. PRNs have physicians order on file. Medications are labeled and checked for expiration dates. Medications are properly documented on the centrally stored medications and destruction record. No errors observed during medications review. INFECTION CONTROL: Upon entry, the facility has a central entry point for symptom screening, temperature checks, and sanitation station. At this time, the staff will continue to keep up signs that promotes good hand hygiene. The facility has an adequate supply of Personal Protection Equipment (PPE), and the facility is able to obtain additional supplies as needed. The facility’s cleaning protocol is sufficient. If needed, the facility has the capacity to designate a single isolation room if the facility has a confirmed case of an infectious disease. The facility’s policies and procedures as it pertains to infection control are adequate. The following deficiencies were observed (See LIC 809-D.) and cited from the California Code of Regulations, Title 22 and California Health and Safety Code. Failure to correct the deficiencies may result in civil penalties. Exit interview conducted. A copy of the report and appeal rights were issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 18, 2024
Jan 5, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Incident
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Martha Arroyo conducted an unannounced Case Management – Incident visit for the purpose of investigating a self-reported incident report and SOC 341. Upon arrival, the LPA met with Executive Director (ED), Margie Veis, and explained the reason for the visit. Entrance interview. On 01/02/2024, the Department received an incident report stating that on the morning of 01/01/2024, Staff #1 (S1) was assisting Resident #1 (R1) with dressing. R1 was resistant to care and became agitated. R1 slapped S1 across the face, causing S1’s glasses to fall off their face and in response, S1 slapped R1 across the face. Staff #2 (S2) witnessed the incident as they were inside the room assisting S1. During today’s visit, the LPA conducted a tour of the Memory Care Unit to ensure there are no health and safety concerns at 12:20 p.m., conducted interviews with the ED and two staff between 12:13 p.m. and 12:45 p.m., conducted a file review at 1:05 p.m., and obtained copies of pertinent documents relevant to the investigation. LPA has determined further investigation is needed and will return at a later date to continue. Exit interview conducted. A copy of the report was issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 5, 2024
Dec 4, 2023Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff is using illegal drugs at the facility.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Martha Arroyo conducted a subsequent complaint visit to deliver final findings for the above allegation. During today’s visit, LPA Arroyo met with Executive Director, Margie Veis and explained the reason for the visit. On 05/30/2023, the Department received a complaint alleging Staff #1 (S1) was using illegal drugs (suspected to be crystal methamphetamine or cocaine) while on the premises. The complaint was referred to the Community Care Licensing (CCL) Investigations Branch (IB) and assigned to Investigator Dennis Seng. (Report Continued on LIC 9099C...) Substantiated (Report Continued from LIC 9099...) On 05/30/2023, from 1:30 p.m. to 5:15 p.m., Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Martha Arroyo conducted an initial complaint visit. During the visit, LPA met with Health Services Director Vivian Reyes. At 1:45 p.m., the LPA conducted a tour of the facility to ensure there were no health and safety hazards. At 3:50 p.m., the LPA conducted a facility file review and obtained copies of pertinent documents relevant to the investigation. Investigator Seng conducted interviews on 06/01/2023, at approximately 12:02 p.m., with the reporting party; on 06/05/2023, from approximately 1:07 p.m. to 4:54 p.m., with various facility staff, residents and S1. In addition, the investigator reviewed staff schedules, personnel files, and photos. The investigation revealed on 05/22/2023, at approximately 1:30 a.m., staff reported to the overnight supervisor that S1 had passed out in the bathroom inside a resident's room. S1 needed help with pulling their pants up, S1 was on the bathroom floor. S1 stated they needed help getting up, because S1 had no feelings in their legs or feet. The supervisor went to the resident’s room and found S1 on their knees, "pretending," to clean. S1 appeared to be groggy and under the influence of a drug. The supervisor went to the staff room to check in S1’s purse and found a black container with a white powder inside. The supervisor confiscated the container and turned it in to management for testing. The supervisor was then terminated for an unauthorized search of S1’s purse. S1 admitted that they were under the influence of marijuana (THC crystals) while providing care for the residents on 05/22/2023 and while on duty. S1 provided photographs of the marijuana they used while working. Per S1’s co-workers, they suspected S1 of being under the influence of an unknown drug due to S1’s behavior, S1 would act jittery, and appear to be incoherent while working. S1 was terminated August 2023 due to poor performance and not completing their job duties. Based on the information gathered during the course of the investigation, the Department has sufficient evidence to determine that S1 was under the influence of drugs while working. Therefore, the allegation “Staff is using illegal drugs at the facility” is deemed substantiated at this time. Pursuant to Title 22, California Code of Regulations, the following deficiency is cited (refer to LIC 9099-D) Exit interview conducted, civil penalty issued, appeal rights discussed, and a copy of this report issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 4, 2023 · control 29-AS-20230530092434
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: HSC 1558 · Plan of correction due date: Dec 4, 2023
(a) The department may prohibit any person from... continuing the employment of, or allowing in a licensed facility or certified family home, or allowing contact with clients of a licensed facility or certified family home by, any employee, prospective employee, or person who is not a client who has: (2) Engaged in conduct that is inimical to the health, morals, welfare, or safety of either the people of this state or an individual in, or receiving services from, the facility or certified family home. This requirement is not met as evidenced by:the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 4, 2023
Plan of correction: The Licensee has agreed to the following: 1.) The Licensee terminated S1. 2.) The Licensee will submit a plan on how the facility will ensure this situation does not occur again and submit to CCL by 12/15/2023. Civil Penalty issued. Based on S1’s admission and photos of the crystal marijuana submitted by S1, S1 was under the influence of drugs while working at the facility, which posed an immediate health and safety risk to residents in care.
What the state’s words mean
CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗
Life here
Rooms, meals, the rhythm of a day, faith and language, pets and house rules — as the home describes them. Tap any detail for its source and date; nothing here is graded.
Find a detail about life at this home.
Rooms & the spaces they will use
Private rooms
Reported on seniorly.com · source dated July 24, 2026.
Outdoor spaceOutdoor common space · Patio · Garden · Walking paths
Reported on seniorly.com · source dated July 24, 2026.
Shared / companion rooms
Reported on seniorly.com · source dated July 24, 2026.
Common areasBistro · Sports / cocktail lounge · Grill · Cafe · Dining room · Fitness room · and 9 more
Bistro · Sports / cocktail lounge · Grill · Cafe · Dining room · Fitness room · Business room · Library · Arts room · Activity room · Movie theater · Game room · On-site market / Store · Spa / sauna / wellness room · Cognitive learning center — reported on seniorly.com · source dated July 24, 2026.
Private bathroom
Reported on seniorly.com · source dated July 24, 2026.
LaundryDone by staff
Reported on seniorly.com · source dated July 24, 2026.
Room typesTwo Bedroom · Studio · One Bedroom
Reported on seniorly.com · source dated July 24, 2026.
Visitor parking
Reported on seniorly.com · source dated July 24, 2026.
Rooms come furnished
Reported on seniorly.com · source dated July 24, 2026.
AmenitiesPiano · Concierge · Move-in coordination · Hot Tub Spa · Theatre · State of the Art Gym
Piano · Concierge · Move-in coordination — reported on seniorly.com · source dated July 24, 2026.
Hot Tub Spa · Theatre · State of the Art Gym — reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.
Wifi in resident rooms
Reported on seniorly.com · source dated July 24, 2026.
Housekeeping
Reported on seniorly.com · source dated July 24, 2026.
Air conditioning in the room
Reported on seniorly.com · source dated July 24, 2026.
Salon or barber
Reported on seniorly.com · source dated July 24, 2026.
Cable or satellite TV
Reported on seniorly.com · source dated July 24, 2026.
Kitchenette in the unit
Reported on seniorly.com · source dated July 24, 2026.
Telephone in the room
Reported on seniorly.com · source dated July 24, 2026.
Meals, preferences & familiar food
Dining styleRestaurant style
Reported on seniorly.com · source dated July 24, 2026.
Special diets supportedLow / No Sodium
Reported on seniorly.com · source dated July 24, 2026.
Meals are cooked in the home's own kitchen
Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.
Texture-modified dietsPureed
Reported on seniorly.com · source dated July 24, 2026.
All-day or flexible dining
Reported on seniorly.com · source dated July 24, 2026.
Vegetarian or vegan optionsVegetarian
Reported on seniorly.com · source dated July 24, 2026.
Family may eat with the resident
Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.
Cultural cuisine regularly servedInternational
Reported on seniorly.com · source dated July 24, 2026.
Meals provided
Reported on seniorly.com · source dated July 24, 2026.
Kosher foodKosher style
Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.
Professional chef
Reported on seniorly.com · source dated July 24, 2026.
Food allergy management
Reported on seniorly.com · source dated July 24, 2026.
Activities & the rhythm of a day
Activity types offeredVolunteer program · Music programs · Scheduled daily activities · Movie nights · Outdoor programs · Bridge club · and 17 more
Volunteer program · Music programs · Scheduled daily activities · Movie nights · Outdoor programs · Bridge club · Book club · Bible study group · Quilting or sewing club · Happy hour · Cooking classes · Live dance or theater performances · Holiday parties · Dances · Art classes · Has karaoke · Trivia games · Live well programs · Has birthday parties · Wine tasting · Walking club · Has wii bowling · Has garden club — reported on seniorly.com · source dated July 24, 2026.
Exercise or fitness programYoga/stretching
Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.
Trips outside the home
Reported on seniorly.com · source dated July 24, 2026.
Resident-run activities
Reported on seniorly.com · source dated July 24, 2026.
Religious services at the home
Reported on seniorly.com · source dated July 24, 2026.
Religious services off site
Reported on seniorly.com · source dated July 24, 2026.
Faith, culture & language
Languages spoken by caregiversEnglish
Reported on seniorly.com · source dated July 24, 2026.
Pets, routines & independence
Residents may bring a pet
Reported on seniorly.com · source dated July 24, 2026.
Pet types allowedDogs · Cats
Reported on seniorly.com · source dated July 24, 2026.
Visiting & staying involved
Support services for families
Reported on seniorly.com · source dated July 24, 2026.
Transport for group outings
Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.
Transportation
Reported on seniorly.com · source dated July 24, 2026.
Before you call
Ask every home the same questions — the state’s record does not answer these. Keep the ones that matter and they travel with your saved homes.
- What is included in the monthly rate, and what costs extra?
- Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?
- Which rooms does the non-ambulatory approval cover, and what transfer support is provided?
- What could change whether someone can stay here?
- Can we see a bedroom and share a meal during a visit?
Other homes nearby
The nearest licensed homes in Ventura County, closest first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.
St. Mary's Home Care
Simi Valley · Small home · 0.3 mi away
$4,550 a month to start · Covelight estimate
Caccam's Stanton Residence
Simi Valley · Small home · 0.4 mi away
$4,650 a month to start · Covelight estimate
Youthful Years
Simi Valley · Small home · 0.4 mi away
$5,700 a month to start · Covelight estimate
Wisdom & Grace Senior Care
Simi Valley · Small home · 0.6 mi away
$4,950 a month to start · Covelight estimate
Regal Residence
Simi Valley · Small home · 0.8 mi away
$5,250 a month to start · Covelight estimate
A Cornerstone Safe Care
Simi Valley · Small home · 0.8 mi away
$5,200 a month to start · Covelight estimate