Skip to main content
CovelightCare
  • Start your search

    • MapExplore homes by area and what matters to you.
    • Directory
    • Guided search
    • Medi-Cal care homes

    Take a closer look

    • Check a home
    • Compare homes
    • Ask homes for me
  • Step by step

    • All care guidesEvery guide, in the order you’ll need them.
    • 1Step 1: Learn the kinds of care homes
    • 2Step 2: Ways to pay for care
    • 3Step 3: Find homes and check them
    • 4Step 4: Visit, and get the papers before you sign
    • 5Step 5: Move in
    • 6Step 6: The first months, and your rights

    Start with a question

    • Who pays for a care home?
    • Does Medi-Cal pay for a care home?
    • Board and care or assisted living?
    • Leaving the hospital soon?
    • Can a care home make someone leave?
    • Print a visit checklist
    • Check a home’s license
  • Professional tools

    • All professional tools
    • Discharge planning
    • Care management
    • Fiduciaries
    • Elder-law attorneys
    • Public-record worklist

    Care home operators

    • Manage your home’s profileYour home’s information and family inquiries.
    • Claim a home
    • Operator sign in
  • Get to know Covelight

    • How we work
    • Our data & sources
    • What’s new
    • Suggest a correction
    • Contact us
Saved homesGuided search
  • Start your search

    • MapExplore homes by area and what matters to you.
    • Directory
    • Guided search
    • Medi-Cal care homes

    Take a closer look

    • Check a home
    • Compare homes
    • Ask homes for me
  • Step by step

    • All care guidesEvery guide, in the order you’ll need them.
    • 1Step 1: Learn the kinds of care homes
    • 2Step 2: Ways to pay for care
    • 3Step 3: Find homes and check them
    • 4Step 4: Visit, and get the papers before you sign
    • 5Step 5: Move in
    • 6Step 6: The first months, and your rights

    Start with a question

    • Who pays for a care home?
    • Does Medi-Cal pay for a care home?
    • Board and care or assisted living?
    • Leaving the hospital soon?
    • Can a care home make someone leave?
    • Print a visit checklist
    • Check a home’s license
  • Professional tools

    • All professional tools
    • Discharge planning
    • Care management
    • Fiduciaries
    • Elder-law attorneys
    • Public-record worklist

    Care home operators

    • Manage your home’s profileYour home’s information and family inquiries.
    • Claim a home
    • Operator sign in
  • Get to know Covelight

    • How we work
    • Our data & sources
    • What’s new
    • Suggest a correction
    • Contact us
Guided search
Palace of JoyLicense #197610152 · Covelight Care
Covelight CarePalace of JoyLicense #197610152 · 6701 Kurl Way, Reseda, CA · (747) 265-6536Record printed from covelightcare.com — data as of the dates shown on each item.
Home/California/Los Angeles County/Reseda/Palace of Joy
Map · 6701 Kurl Way

© Protomaps © OpenStreetMap

Estimated starting rate$5,050/mo

Covelight estimate · likely $4,150–$6,250 · See costs

Check availability

Request a tour

More days
  • AskThe cost, or your own question
  • (747) 265-6536

    From the state licensing record · October 26, 2026

  • seniorfacilitycare.com↗

Free for families. A home gets your number only if you say yes.

PJ

Call Palace of Joy

Reseda · Licensed for 6

(747) 265-6536

From the state licensing record · October 26, 2026

From the home’s website, seniorfacilitycare.com:

(310) 779-4433 · main line · seen October 5, 2026

marinegrig@yahoo.com · general email · seen October 5, 2026

or

Let us do the legwork

  • We ask about availability, price and the care you describe.
  • If it’s a fit, you choose whether they call you. Either way, you get every answer.
Check availabilityFree

Small home · Licensed for 6 · Reseda

Palace of Joy

6701 Kurl Way, Reseda, CA 91335 · Licensed since 2021

  • Overview
  • Care
  • Costs
  • Daily life
  • Location
  • State record

Palace of Joy

Overview

Estimated starting rate

$5,050 a month

Covelight estimate · likely $4,150–$6,250 See costs

No openings reported

  • Approved by the state: Wheelchair · Hospice · BedriddenState licensing record · October 26, 2026
  • Ways to pay: Medi-Cal ALW acceptedDHCS participant list · October 1, 2026
  • Licensed for 6: a small care homeThe state license record

Ask this home

Check availability

Request a tour

More days
  • AskThe cost, or your own question

Free for families. A home gets your number only if you say yes.

Care and support

  • Wheelchairup to 4 residents
  • Hospiceup to 4 residents
  • Bedriddenup to 1 resident

Not on file: dementia approval.

Approved by the state · State licensing record · October 26, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.

Read the state’s own wording
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER 6 AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 4 MAY BE NON-AMBULATORY AND 1 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN.BEDROOM #1 CLEARED FOR AMB, BEDROOM # 2, 3, 4 CLEARED FOR NON-AMB. BEDROOM # 4 CLEARED FOR 1 BEDRIDDEN CLIENT. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 4,

935 - ELDERLY

CDSS record, verbatim · October 26, 2026

Care services

These are the home’s own statements about its day-to-day practice — they are not part of the state licensing record, and the state has not approved or reviewed them.

  • Assisted living

    Reported on seniorfacilitycare.com · seen October 5, 2026.

  • Help with bathing or showering

    Reported on seniorfacilitycare.com · seen October 5, 2026.

  • Help with dressing and grooming

    Reported on seniorfacilitycare.com · seen October 5, 2026.

  • Activities of daily living the home lists help withBathing · Dressing · Eating

    Reported on seniorfacilitycare.com · seen October 5, 2026.

  • Emergency call system

    Reported on seniorfacilitycare.com · seen October 5, 2026.

As needs change

  • Staying through hospice

    Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 4 — care may continue at the end of life

    State licensing record · October 26, 2026

We’ll ask for you. Not on file for Palace of Joy: two-person transfers or a lift, who is awake overnight, help with medicines and care if memory loss develops. When we check availability, we ask about these too.

Check availability

What it costs here

Covelight estimate

$5,050a month to start

Likely $4,150–$6,250

From 15 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file

Monthly cost breakdownWith a shared room and basic help · room, care and fees$5,050likely a month
Room
Daily care
Sharing the room

Memory care is not priced here: a dementia-care designation is not on file for this home. Ask the home.

  • Starting monthly rate$5,050likely $4,150–$6,250

    Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 15 small homes within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

  • Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600

    Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (44 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).

  • One-time move-in fee$2,500one time · likely $0–$4,000

    Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,500 (133 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.

Likely monthly totalLikely $4,150–$6,400
$5,050
First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $4,850–$9,600
$7,550
How people payOn the Medi-Cal waiver list · private pay, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
  • MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
  • Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
  • Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home appears on the DHCS participation list, October 1, 2026. Confirm eligibility and current participation with the program. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board. On the waiver, a resident on SSI/SSP pays the home $1,444.07 a month for room and board.
  • SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
  • VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
  • Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
If the money runs out, what Medi-Cal covers
Rates at nearby homes15 nearby homes publish starting rates of $3,500 to $10,000

$3,500$10,000

EstimateLikely rangeA nearby home’s published starting rate

15 homes like this within 5 miles publish starting rates mostly between $3,500–$7,550.

  • Blue Skies RanchTarzana · 1.2 mi · Small home
    $4,500Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
  • Elegance Care ResortTarzana · 1.2 mi · Small home
    $10,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
  • Liebelove CareWoodland Hills · 1.3 mi · Small home
    $5,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
  • A Paradise in the ValleyNorthridge · 2.1 mi · Small home
    $5,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living one bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
  • Breath of Sunshine PlusNorthridge · 2.4 mi · Small home
    $3,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
  • Lily of the ValleyNorthridge · 2.6 mi · Small home
    $3,800Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
  • Wholesome Life Senior LivingCanoga Park · 3.8 mi · Small home
    $5,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
  • Agape Senior ResidenceChatsworth · 4.0 mi · Small home
    $3,500Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
  • Topanga Gardens Residential Home CareCanoga Park · 4.0 mi · Small home
    $4,000Listed on its own website · shared room, starting rate · seen October 5, 2026
  • Grant Serenity Homes of SF ValleyVan Nuys · 4.3 mi · Small home
    $7,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
  • Mom and Dads RetreatVan Nuys · 4.5 mi · Small home
    $3,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
  • Alaga HomesNorthridge · 4.8 mi · Small home
    $6,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
  • Elite Retirement ResidenceWest Hills · 4.9 mi · Small home
    $5,500Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
  • A Caring Touch Board and CareChatsworth · 4.9 mi · Small home
    $4,500Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
  • Healthy Life Service FacilityNorth Hills · 4.9 mi · Small home
    $5,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 15 small homes within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

  • Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
  • Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
  • Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
  • Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
  • We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
  • It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
  • The care level

    Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.

  • What is billed separately

    Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.

  • Move-in costs

    A one-time move-in fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.

  • Increases

    California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.

Ask for the price

An estimate for planning, not a quote. A home sets the price after hearing about the care needed.

Daily life

Rooms, meals, activities and house rules, in the home’s own words. Open any detail to see where it came from.

Rooms & the spaces they will use (7)Private rooms · Amenities · Wifi
  • Private rooms

    Reported on seniorfacilitycare.com · seen October 5, 2026.

  • AmenitiesSatellite TV

    Reported on seniorfacilitycare.com · seen October 5, 2026.

  • Wifi

    Reported on seniorfacilitycare.com · seen October 5, 2026.

  • Shared / companion rooms

    Reported on seniorfacilitycare.com · seen October 5, 2026.

  • Housekeeping

    Reported on seniorfacilitycare.com · seen October 5, 2026.

  • Room typesPrivate rooms · Shared rooms · Private · Shared

    Reported on seniorfacilitycare.com · seen October 5, 2026.

  • Rooms come furnished

    Reported on seniorfacilitycare.com · source dated June 15, 2026.

Meals, preferences & familiar food (3)Meals provided per day · Meals provided · Dining atmosphere
  • Meals provided per day3

    Reported on seniorfacilitycare.com · seen October 5, 2026.

  • Meals provided

    Reported on seniorfacilitycare.com · seen October 5, 2026.

  • Dining atmosphereCentral dining programs

    Reported on seniorfacilitycare.com · seen October 5, 2026.

Activities & the rhythm of a day (2)Activity types offered · Exercise or fitness program
  • Activity types offeredScheduled activities · Social opportunities · Educational activities

    Reported on seniorfacilitycare.com · seen October 5, 2026.

  • Exercise or fitness programExercise activities

    Reported on seniorfacilitycare.com · seen October 5, 2026.

Visiting & staying involved (1)URL of the photo gallery page
  • URL of the photo gallery page

    Reported on seniorfacilitycare.com · source dated June 15, 2026.

    Open on the website ↗
About the home (1)Brand or trade name
  • Brand or trade namePalace of Joy

    Reported on seniorfacilitycare.com · seen October 5, 2026.

Where it is

6701 Kurl Way, Reseda, CA 91335Address from the public record · October 26, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.

Opening the neighborhood map…

  1. 1Providence Cedars-Sinai Tarzana Medical CenterHospital · General acute care, on the state’s list1.6 mi

Straight-line distances; check the drive or the walk. Hospital: the nearest general acute care hospital on the state’s list (CDPH, September 16, 2026).

Open directions ↗

The state record

California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

CDSS public record, read October 26, 2026 · License #197610152 · See the state’s own record ↗

The last 36 months — 10 of 19 documents

Complaint outcomes in these 36 months, in the state’s words: 3 “Substantiated” and 3 “Unsubstantiated”.

20264 state visits · 4 documents

Sep 2, 2026Facility evaluation reportCase Management - OtherDeficiency pages: Type A, Type B

Type of visit: Case Management - Other

At 9:30 AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Huma Rahimi, conducted a case management visit to verify proper medication administration and management for residents in care. LPA met with the staff and the Administrator was contacted via telephone. LPA explained the reason for the visit. The Administrator left the facility and assigned the Licensee to sign and receive today's report. During the visit, LPA reviewed R1’s Centrally Stored Medication Record (CSMR), medication packaging, and medication counts. On 09/02/2026, LPA identified the following discrepancies: Amlodipine: One tablet discrepancy; 45 tablets were present instead of the expected 46. Divalproex Sodium: One day’s dose remained in the bubble pack, indicating one missed dose. Escitalopram: Two tablets were missing from the new bubble pack. Vitamin B1: New bubble pack was started on 08/31/2026 instead of 08/30/2026, indicating a missed/delayed dose. Celecoxib: Medication supply was exhausted on 08/28/2026. R1 had not received the medication since the evening of 08/28/2026, and no refill was available from the pharmacy. Trazodone: One extra tablet remained in the bottle, and the new bubble pack had not been started as scheduled. No discrepancies were identified for Tamsulosin, Docusate Sodium, or Atorvastatin. LPA determined that the facility failed to timely notify R1’s physician and Community Care Licensing Division (CCLD) regarding the medication discrepancies and Celecoxib interruption. LPA discussed the findings with the Administrator and advised that medications must be administered as prescribed, discrepancies and medication interruptions must be immediately addressed and documented, and required notifications must be made timely.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 2, 2026

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87465(c)(2) · Plan of correction due date: Sep 3, 2026

87465- Incidental Medical and Dental Care: c) If the resident's physician has stated in writing... 2) Once ordered by the physician the medication is given according to the physician's directions. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interview, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above by failing to ensure that R1’s prescribed medications were administered as ordered, medication discrepancies were timely addressed, and R1’s physician and CCLD were timely notified of medication errors and the interruption of prescribed medication. This poses an immediate health, safety, or personal rights risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 2, 2026

Plan of correction: The Licensee agreed to schedule vendorized training for all staff by 9/3/26 and submit to CCL the vendor information and scheduled date of training. Training certifications to be submitted to CCL upon completion.

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR87211(a)(1)A,B&D · Plan of correction due date: Sep 9, 2026

(a) Each licensee shall furnish to the licensing agency such reports... (1) A written report shall be submitted to the licensing agency and to the person... ... any of the events specified in (A), (B) & (D)... This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews and record reviews, conducted by LPA, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above by failing to notify CCLD and R1's Physician regarding R1's medication discrepancies, which poses a potential health and safety risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 2, 2026

Plan of correction: The Licensee agreed to notify R1’s physician and submit an incident report to CCLD regarding R1’s medication discrepancies identified during LPA’s review on 09/02/2026. The discrepancies involved medications prescribed from 06/01/2026 through 08/29/2026, during which period the medications were expected to be administered as prescribed.

Aug 25, 2026Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff scream at residents.

At 9:30 AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Huma Rahimi, conducted an unannounced initial complaint visit to investigate the above stated allegations. LPA met with the Staff #1 (S1) who granted access to the facility. S1 contacted the Administrator and LPA explained the reason for the visit. The Administrator arrived shortly after. During the course of the investigation, LPA conducted interviews, reviewed pertinent records, and conducted a physical plant tour. At 9:35 AM, LPA requested the resident and staff rosters. At 9:40 AM, LPA requested pertinent records relevant to the investigation, including, but not limited to, Physician's Reports, Appraisal Needs and Services Plans, staff training records, sample menus, and other applicable documentation. At approximately 9:45 AM, LPA conducted a physical plant tour of the facility. Between 9:50 AM and 12:30 PM, LPA conducted interviews with the Administrator, Staff #1 (S1), and four (4) of five (5) residents who were available. Continue on LIC 9099C Substantiated Allegation: Staff scream at residents. It was alleged that facility staff screamed at residents. To investigate this allegation, LPA conducted interviews with the Administrator, Staff #1 (S1), and four (4) out of five (5) residents who were available. The Administrator and S1 denied ever screaming or yelling at residents in care. The Administrator stated that staff are expected to remain professional and respectful when interacting with residents. Three (3) of the four (4) residents interviewed denied hearing staff scream or yell at residents and denied being screamed or yelled at by staff. One (1) resident reported witnessing a staff member yell at Resident #2 (R2). During the investigation, LPA directly observed the licensee interacting with Resident #1 (R1). LPA observed the licensee raise their voice and scream at R1. LPA further observed the licensee become visibly agitated and act aggressively toward R1 during the interaction. Although the Administrator, S1, and three (3) residents denied witnessing or experiencing staff yelling or screaming at residents, one (1) resident provided information consistent with the allegation, and LPA directly observed the licensee scream at R1 during the investigation. Based on LPA's direct observation and the information obtained through interviews, there is sufficient evidence to establish that the alleged conduct occurred. Therefore, the allegation that staff scream at residents is deemed Substantiated. Appeal rights explained. Exit interview conducted and copy of this report signed and delivered. Allegation: Staff are not meeting resident’s showering needs. It was alleged that facility staff are not meeting residents' showering needs. To investigate this allegation, LPA conducted interviews with the Administrator, Staff #1 (S1), and four (4) out of five (5) residents who were available. The Administrator and S1 stated that residents receive showers at least twice a week or as needed and may request additional showers. Both denied refusing or delaying residents' showers. One (1) resident requires assistance with showering and reported receiving regular showers. The resident denied being denied or delayed a shower or witnessing another resident being denied a shower. During the visit, LPA observed the residents to be clean and well-groomed and did not observe any concerns related to residents' showering needs. Based on interviews and LPA's observations, there was insufficient evidence to establish that staff failed to meet residents' showering needs. Therefore, this allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. Allegation: Staff do not provide adequate food service to residents. It was alleged that facility staff do not provide adequate food service to residents. To investigate this allegation, LPA conducted interviews with the Administrator, Staff #1 (S1), and four (4) out of five (5) residents who were available. LPA also conducted a physical observation of the facility's food supplies. The Administrator and S1 stated that residents are provided meals according to their preferences and dietary needs and that groceries are purchased regularly and as needed. Three (3) out of four (4) residents interviewed reported receiving meals regularly and denied concerns regarding the food service. During LPA's observation, the facility had approximately two (2) days of perishable food and one (1) week of non-perishable food available. Based on interviews and LPA's observation, there was insufficient evidence to establish that staff failed to provide adequate food service to residents. Therefore, this allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. Appeal rights explained. Exit interview conducted and copy of this report signed and delivered.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 25, 2026 · control 31-AS-20260819115023

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87468.1(a)(1) · Plan of correction due date: Sep 1, 2026

Personal Rights of Residents in All Facilities (a) Residents in all residential care facilities for the elderly shall have all of the following personal rights: (1) To be accorded dignity in their personal relationships....This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews and LPA’s direct observation, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above by screaming at and acting aggressively toward Resident #1 (R1), which posed a potential Health, Safety, or Personal Rights risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 25, 2026

Plan of correction: The licensee agreed to review residents’ personal rights and the staff and licensee will receive training on the section cited. Proof of staff/licensee training will be e-mailed to LPA by the POC POC due date.

Feb 18, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not prevent a resident from smoking drugs inside the facility. Staff did not ensure that complete resident records were maintained at the facility.

At 9:45 a.m., Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Huma Rahimi conducted a subsequent complaint visit to investigate the above-stated allegations. LPA met with Staff #1 (S1), Lourdes Zapata, and the staff contacted the Administrator by telephone. LPA explained the reason for the visit, and the Administrator arrived shortly thereafter. An initial complaint visit was conducted on 12/10/2025. During that visit, LPA obtained copies of the client and staff rosters. LPA interviewed the Administrator. At 9:40 AM, LPA requested copies of resident documentation. The Administrator informed LPA that, in accordance with the three (3) years retention practice, all resident records older than three (3) years had been purged and were no longer available for audit or review During today's visit, between 10:00 am to 12:00 pm, LPA conducted interview with the Administrator, two (2) staff, and two (2) out of four (4) residents who were avaliable. At 12:10 PM, LPA conducted file review of four (4) out of four (4) residents. Continue on LIC 9099C Unsubstantiated Staff did not prevent a resident from smoking drugs inside the facility. It was alleged that staff did not prevent a resident from smoking drugs inside the facility. To investigate, LPA conducted interviews with the Administrator, two current staff, and two (2) out of four (4) residents who were available. The Administrator denied the allegation and stated the facility maintains a strict no-drug policy and that staff supervision is provided at all times. The Administrator confirmed one resident death occurred in September 2022 while receiving hospice services for end-stage heart failure but denied any knowledge of drug use. Staff reported they were not employed at the facility in September 2022 and have never observed drug or alcohol use. Staff also confirmed that all resident rooms are monitored and that no residents currently require oxygen. Interview with two (2) out of four (4) residents stated that drugs are not used at the facility, substance use is prohibited, and staff maintain resident safety. Based on interviews and observations, there is insufficient evidence to support the allegation. This allegation is Unsubstantiated at this time. Staff did not ensure that complete resident records were maintained at the facility. It was alleged that staff did not maintain complete resident records. To investigate, LPA conducted interviews with the Administrator, two current staff, and two (2) out of four (4) residents who were available, and reviewed current resident files. The Administrator stated that all required documentation, including Admission Agreements, Physician’s Reports, and Appraisal/Needs and Services Plans, are maintained at the facility. The Administrator further stated that records older than three years are purged in accordance with Title 22 CCR. Staff confirmed that records are securely stored, accessible during emergencies, and complete. Interview with two (2) out of four (4) residents confirmed that their medical and non-medical records are complete and accessible, and emergency personnel have never been unable to access records. During today's visit, LPA reviewed four (4) out of four (4) resident files and observed documentation was complete, organized, and maintained in compliance with regulatory requirements. Based on interviews and record review, there is insufficient evidence to support the allegation. This allegation is Unsubstantiated at this time. Appeal rights explained and exit interview conducted. Copy of this report signed and delivered.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 18, 2026 · control 31-AS-20251208091849
Feb 10, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff untrained providing care and supervision to residents. Staff unable to communicate residents needs due to language barrier. Staff does not follow food menu.

At 9:10 AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Huma Rahimi, conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint visit to investigate the above stated allegations. LPA met with the Administrator and explained the reason for the visit. On 12/10/2025, the LPA conducted the initial visit. At approximately 9:35 AM, the LPA requested the resident and staff rosters. At approximately 9:40 AM, the LPA requested copies of pertinent records relevant to the investigation, including staff training records, facility policies, and the facility’s food menu. At approximately 9:45 AM, the LPA conducted a physical plant tour. Between approximately 9:55 AM and 10:00 AM, the LPA conducted an interview with the Administrator. On 02/10/2026, during the subsequent visit, between approximately 9:30 AM and 1:20 PM, the LPA conducted interviews with two (2) staff and four (4) out of four (4) residents. At approximately 1:25 PM, the LPA reviewed resident records and staff training records relevant to the investigation. Continue on LIC 9099C Unsubstantiated Allegation: Staff untrained providing care and supervision to residents. It was alleged that staff were untrained and providing care and supervision to residents. To investigate, LPA interviewed the Administrator, Staff #1 (S1), Staff #2 (S2), and four (4) out of four (4) residents, and reviewed staff training records. The Administrator stated that all direct-care staff receive initial training upon hire, including dementia care, medication administration, residents’ rights, facility policies, and reporting requirements, and competency is verified through daily observation by the Administrator. S1 and S2 stated they received initial and ongoing training and are able to perform assigned duties. During the facility tour and observations, LPA noted staff providing care and supervision to residents. Four (4) out of four (4) residents interviewed stated their care needs are being met and expressed no concerns. Based on interviews, record review, and observations, this allegation is Unsubstantiated. Allegation: Staff unable to communicate residents’ needs due to language barrier. It was alleged that staff were unable to communicate residents’ needs due to a language barrier. To investigate, LPA interviewed the Administrator, S1, S2, and four (4) out of four (4) residents. The Administrator stated that at least one English-speaking staff member is present on each shift. S1 and S2 stated they communicate effectively with residents. During the facility tour and observations, LPA noted staff effectively communicating with residents, and residents responding appropriately. Four (4) out of four (4) residents interviewed stated they are able to communicate their basic needs and had no concerns. Based on interviews and observations, this allegation is Unsubstantiated. Allegation: Staff does not follow the posted food menu It was alleged that staff failed to follow the posted food menu and provided a poor diet to residents in care. To investigate, LPA interviewed the Administrator, Staff #1 (S1), Staff #2 (S2), and four (4) out of four (4) residents. LPA reviewed the facility’s sample menu and observed food items in the refrigerator and throughout the facility that matched the sample menu. During the initial and subsequent complaint visits, LPA conducted a physical plant tour and observed nutritious food available to residents. All four (4) residents interviewed stated that meals are adequate and not poor in quality. Based on interviews, record review, and observations, this allegation is Unsubstantiated. Appeal rights explained. Exit interview conducted and copy of this report signed and delivered.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 10, 2026 · control 31-AS-20251209103650

20254 state visits · 5 documents

Dec 23, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff unable to meet residents needs due to language barrier.

At 9:45 a.m., Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Huma Rahimi conducted a subsequent complaint visit to investigate the above-stated allegation. LPA met with Staff #1 (S1), Lourdes Zapata, and the staff contacted the Administrator by telephone. LPA explained the reason for the visit, and the Administrator arrived shortly thereafter. An initial complaint visit was conducted on 06/23/2025 by LPA Leslie Ngo-Castaneda. During that visit, LPA obtained copies of the client and staff rosters, residents’ physician reports, admission agreements, appraisals, and other relevant documents. LPA also conducted a physical plant tour of the facility. Interviews were conducted with the Administrator, three (3) staff members, and six (6) out of six (6) residents. During today's visit LPA Rahimi, conducted a physical plant tour of the facility. Continue on LIC 9099C Substantiated Allegation: Staff unable to meet residents needs due to language barrier. It is alleged that facility staff are unable to meet resident needs due to a language barrier. To investigate this allegation, on 06/23/2025, LPA Ngo-Castaneda conducted interviews with the Administrator, residents, and staff, and observed staff-resident interactions. During the inspection, LPA experienced difficulty communicating with staff and observed staff relying on cellular telephone translation applications to communicate with residents. LPA Ngo-Castaneda noted inaccuracies in the translations. One resident reported feelings of fear and frustration when attempting to communicate their needs due to unreliable translation. For the first two (2) hours of the initial inspection conducted on 06/23/2025, the only staff present at the facility were non-English-speaking staff. After approximately two (2) hours, an additional staff member arrived who was able to communicate in English. Interviews with five (5) out of six (6) residents confirmed that staff frequently use cellular telephones to communicate. The Administrator acknowledged that some staff have a language barrier and rely on translation tools. Based on interviews and direct observation, LPA determined that language barriers impacted effective communication with residents, the majority of whom speak English, regarding their basic needs and services. Therefore, this allegation is deemed Substantiated. A deficiency was issued, and appeal rights were explained. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report was signed and delivered. Allegation: Staff did not administer resident’s medication as prescribed. It is alleged that facility staff did not administer Resident #1’s (R1) medication as prescribed. To investigate this allegation, on 06/23/2025, LPA Ngo-Castaneda conducted interviews with the Administrator, facility staff, residents, a hospice nurse, and a witness. The Administrator and staff stated that all medications are administered according to physician’s orders and stored in a locked medication cabinet in compliance with Title 22 regulations. Staff reported that R1 requested to keep prescribed eye drops in their room; however, medications are not permitted to be kept in resident rooms. Interview with a witness confirmed that R1 receives medications as prescribed. Interview with the hospice nurse assigned to another resident confirmed medications observed at the facility were in order. Interviews with five (5) out of six (6) residents stated they receive medications as prescribed and did not express concerns regarding medication administration. Based on interviews and observations, there was insufficient evidence to support the allegation; therefore, this allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. Allegation: Staff discarded resident’s personal belongings. It is alleged that facility staff discarded Resident #1’s personal belongings without consent. To investigate this allegation, on 06/23/2025, LPA Ngo-Castaneda conducted interviews with the Administrator, staff, and residents. The Administrator and staff informed LPA that the facility only removed hazardous items such as razors, scissors, bodily waste, and spoiled food during cleaning for health and safety reasons only. Staff denied discarding non-hazardous personal belongings. Interviews with five (5) out of six (6) residents stated they have not had personal belongings thrown away without their permission. Interview with the witness confirmed that R1 tends to hoard and bring dangerous items to the facility. Therefore, based on interviews this allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. Allegation: Staff not providing adequate food service to resident. It is alleged that facility staff do not provide adequate food service to residents. To investigate this allegation, on 06/23/2025, LPA Ngo-Castaneda conducted interviews with the Administrator, staff, and six (6) out of six (6) residents. Continue on LIC 9099C The Administrator and staff stated that meals provided include protein such as chicken, beef, eggs, and sausage. Staff further reported that some residents maintain personal refrigerators for preferred food items. Interviews with five (5) out of six (6) residents did not express any concerns regarding food quality and reported that food portions were adequate and acceptable. The hospice nurse stated that nutritious food was observed during lunch/mealtime. During today’s visit, LPA Rahimi conducted a physical plant tour of the facility and observed that the facility’s food supply included milk products, meat, vegetables, fruits, bread, cereals, juices, and desserts. Based on interviews and observations, there was insufficient evidence to support a violation related to food service. Therefore, this allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. Allegation: Staff restricting resident from leaving the facility. It is alleged that facility staff restrict R1 from leaving the facility. To investigate this allegation, on 06/23/2025, LPA Ngo-Castaneda interviewed the Administrator, staff, and five (5) out of six (6) residents. The Administrator and staff stated residents are not restricted from leaving; however, supervision is required for certain residents per Physician report/order. Additionally, staff reported accompanying residents when necessary for safety reasons. Interviews with five (5) out of six (6) residents stated they are not restricted from leaving the facility and may access outdoor areas freely. Based on interviews and evidence, this allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. Exit interview conducted and copy of this report signed and delivered.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 23, 2025 · control 31-AS-20250618111717

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87411(d)(3) · Plan of correction due date: Dec 30, 2025

87411-Personnel Requirements General-(d)(3)Skill and knowledge required to provide necessary resident care and supervision, including the ability to communicate with residents.,.This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on LPA Ngo-Castaneda’s interviews and observation, the administrator does not have staff available to communicate with residents to provide care which poses a potential risk to the residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 23, 2025

Plan of correction: The Administrator agreed to have at least one English-speaking staff on each shift. The administrator will monitor staff schedules and resident interactions weekly to ensure compliance. Currently the Administrator has one staff on each shift who speaks English. POC cleared during today's visit.

Nov 17, 2025Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

At 10:45 AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Huma Rahimi conducted an unannounced annual visit. LPA met with Lourdes Zapata, Caregiver, who granted access to the facility. The Administrator Marine Grigoryan was contacted via a telephone and LPA explained the reason for the visit. The Administrator arrived at the facility at 11:00 AM. LPA was informed that the facility currently has six (6) residents, of which two (2) residents are non-ambulatory. Three (3) residents are currently on hospice. Facility has waiver for 4 hospice residents. KITCHEN: LPA observed the kitchen area equipped with a refrigerator, microwave oven, and a sink. Stove was observed in a good working condition. At 11:10 AM, LPA observed adequate supplies of perishable and nonperishable food and dining ware to accommodate a maximum capacity of six (6). All knives and sharps are observed to be locked in a kitchen drawer and inaccessible to residents in care. LPA observed a Fire Extinguisher and was purchased on 11/17/2025. It was observed hanging on the wall by the bathroom in the main hall. MEDICATION ROOM: The centrally stored medication are kept in the in a locked cabinet in the main hall by the kitchen. Residents and staff files are also kept in a cabinet locked and inaccessible in the main hall by the kitchen. During review of 23's random medication revealed that the facility was supposed to start Carvedilol 12.5MG (Hypertension Medication) a new bottle on 10/16/2025. During today's visit LPA counted R2's medication and it was discovered that there was a discrepancy and twenty two (22) extra pills were in the bottle. LPA asked the Administrator and the staff for explaining and both staff and the Administrator could not provide any answers. Continue on LIC 809C BEDROOMS: There are four (4) bedrooms designated for resident’s use. Two (2) bedrooms are shared and two (2) are private. Bedroom #4 is for bedridden resident. LPA observed that the bedridden bedroom exit was being blocked by a wheelchair. All bedrooms are furnished with beds, dressers and required bedding and linen. The bedrooms have sufficient closet space and have sufficient lighting. LPA observed Tylenol tablets, and Mylanta liquid in Bedroom #4 accessible and unlocked to residents in care. Auditory alarms were tested and observed to be non-operational. BATHROOMS: There are three (3) bathrooms at the facility. Two (2) out of three (3) bathrooms are designated for resident's use. One of the bathrooms is located at the end of the kitchen is only being used by the staff and visitors. Bathroom #1 is located in the hallway and bathroom # 2 is connected with bedroom #4. LPA observed all residents' bathrooms are clean and in good repair. Properly supplied with toilet papers, soap and paper towels. LPA observed appropriate grab bar and had non-skid mat The water temperature was noted at 131.1°. LAUNDRY ROOM: The laundry room is located by the kitchen. All the cleaning supplies and laundry detergents were observed locked in a locked box in the backyard of the facility. The washer/dryer appear to be in good working condition. COMMON AREAS: The facility maintains a comfortable temperature at 77°F. The living room and dining area appeared clean and were properly furnished and has a television. No obstructions and or tripping hazards throughout the facility. LPA observed a working telephone for the facility. SURROUNDING GROUNDS: The facility has sufficient backyard space. LPA did not observe any shaded area. LPA observed the furniture; however, they were not properly placed for residents to sit. The furniture were scattered around in the backyard. LPA observed a swimming pool which was locked and properly fenced. Garage/Storage: The facility does not have any extra garage/storage space. Continue on LIC 809C SMOKE DETECTORS/CARBON MONOXIDE. Smoke detectors and carbon monoxide were located throughout the facility. At 11:30 AM, they were tested and observed to be operational. Between 12:00 PM to 2:00 PM, LPA reviewed records of six (6) residents and two (2) staff records. All residents and staff records were updated and completed. Administrative: LPA collected Certificate of Liability Insurance, and LIC500. Deficiencies issued and appeal rights explained. Exit interview conducted and copy of this report signed and delivered.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 17, 2025
May 20, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: MStaff are not meeting resident's toileting needs. Staff are not meeting resident's hygiene needs. Staff are not adhering to sanitation protocols.

At 9:30 AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Huma Rahimi conducted an unannounced initial complaint visit to this facility to investigate the above allegations. LPA met with staff Keneshbek Minzhasharov and the staff contacted the Administrator via phone. LPA explained the reason for the visit. During course of the investigation, interviews and record review were made. At 9:35 AM, LPA requested resident and staff roster. At 9:40 AM, LPA requested copies of pertinent information which include, but not limited to Admission Agreement, Physician Report, Appraisal Needs and Services Plan, Centrally Stored Medication Destruction (CSMD) and etc., relevant to the investigation. At approximately 9:45 AM, LPA conducted a physical plant tour. Between 9:55 AM – 12:45 PM, LPA conducted an interview with the Administrator, a staff, and five (5) out of sxi (6) residents who were able to communicate. Continue on LIC 9099C Unsubstantiated Staff are not meeting resident's toileting needs. It is alleged that the facility staff is not able to change Resident #1 (R1) due to the religion restriction of the staff and R1 was covered with feces. To investigate this allegation LPA conducted an interview with the Administrator and it was revealed that on 05/02/2025, R1 was taken care of for the toileting needs accordingly; however, due to the constipation issue R1 was unable to have a normal bowel movement. Additionally, staff place R1 on a bed side commode and again R1 was unable to have any bowel movement. Due to R1 becoming weak R1 asked the staff to place him/her in bed. Later, after R1 made his/here business (bowel movement) in bed and touched his/her own feces. R1 called the staff and asked to be cleaned. Furthermore, interview with two staff confirmed the information provided by the Administrator and informed LPA that the staff are always available to provide all required care including toileting needs. Interview with five (5) out of six (6) residents including R1 stated that the facility staff do meet toileting needs of all the residents in a timely manner and did not express any concerns regarding the above allegation. Therefore, based on the information provided through interviews this allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. Staff are not meeting resident's hygiene needs. It is alleged that R1's phone was filled with feces, and R1 was unable to receive phone calls. Moreover, it is alleged that R1's environment is not clean and sanitary in the facility. To investigate this allegation LPA conducted an interview with the Administrator and it was revealed that on 05/02/2025, R1 had constipation issue. The staff provided bed side commode and R1 was unable to have a bowel movement. Eventually, R1 had a bowel movement in his/her bed. As a result, , R1's phone that was placed in bed got covered with R1's feces. Interview with two staff revealed that after the incident R1, the bed, and the phone were cleaned immediately. Furthermore, LPA conducted an interview with R1 who confirmed that the information provided by both staff and the Administrator. Moreover, R1 informed LPA that due to non-payment of the phone bill R1 was unable to receive any phone calls. Interview with residents stated that all of their hygiene needs are being met and expressed no concerns. Lastly, during today's visit, LPA observed that the facility is following all the hygiene needs of the residents including R1's. LPA observed that the facility is sanitary and clean including R1's room. Based on the interviews and LPA's observation during today's visit this allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. Continue on LIC 9099C Staff are not adhering to sanitation protocols. It is alleged that the facility staff used same gloves that they used to change one resident and changed another resident. To investigate this allegation LPA conducted an interview with the Administrator and two staff. All parties interviewed denied the above allegation and informed LPA that gloves are being changed after providing care and supervision to each resident. LPA was also informed that the same gloves cannot be used for several tasks. Furthermore, during today's visit LPA observed that both staff are wearing new gloves before serving a resident. Lastly LPA observed several boxes full of gloves being stacked in the kitchen closet. Therefore, based on interviews and observation this allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated. Exit interview conducted. Copy of this report signed and delivered.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 20, 2025 · control 31-AS-20250516105015
May 20, 2025Facility evaluation reportCase Management - DeficienciesDeficiency pages: Type B

Type of visit: Case Management - Deficiencies

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Huma Rahimi, met with the staff Keneshbek Minzhasharov, and the Administrator Marine Grigoryan was contacted via phone and LPA explained the reason for the case management visit. The purpose of the case management visit is to address deficiencies observed during the course of complaint # 31-AS-20250516105015, The deficiencies were not alleged but observed by LPA. During the visit, LPA was informed that R1 is having behavior issues/incidents on daily basis. Furthermore, on 05/02/2025, R1 had a bowel movement incident. On 03/27/25, R2 was taken to the hospital by calling 9-1-1 for shortness of breath. However, no incident reports were submitted to the Community Care Licensing Department (CCLD) in a timely manner for R1 and R2. LPA reviewed all incident reports on a system and did not observe any Incident Reports regarding R1. In addition, the Administrator admitted that no incident was submitted to the Regional Office (RO). Based on Title 22 Regulation: a written Unusual Incident/Injury Report shall be submitted to CCLD within seven (7) days of occurrence. LPA informed the Administrator that all staff members are mandated reporters and they are all responsible for reporting. LPA informed the Administrator to submit an incident report that occurred on: 05/02/25 for R1 All other incidents (related to R1) 03/27/25 (R2) hospitalization Moreover, upon arrival to the facility LPA conducted interviews and concluded that two (2) out of two (2) staff were not able to communicate in English with the residents of which the majority speak English. Furthermore, interviews with five (5) out of six (6) residents who were able to communicate confirmed that Continue on LIC 809C they have trouble communicating with staff for their basic needs. Lastly, during today's visit both staff used translator application on their phone to communicate/interview with LPA. Therefore, a deficiency will be issued. Lastly, during the course of investigation LPA observed a small scratch on R2's nose. During the interview LPA was informed that R2 was physically abused by Staff #1 (S1). LPA observed that R2 was not consistent with the information provided to LPA. LPA conducted a file review of R2 and observed that R2 is diagnosed with dementia, schizophrenia, and bipolar disorder. Additionally, LPA conducted interviews with the Administrator, and two staff. All parties interviewed denied ever witnessing or physically abusing anyone in the facility. Therefore, due to the lack of evidence LPA was unable to conclude that R2 was ever physical abused by facility staff. Deficiencies cited during today's visit and appeal rights explained and given. Exit interview conducted and copy of this report signed and delivered.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 20, 2025

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87411(d)(3) · Plan of correction due date: May 27, 2025

87411-Personnel Requirements General-(d)(3)Skill and knowledge required to provide necessary resident care and supervision, including the ability to communicate with residents.,.This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on LPA’s interview and observation, the administrator does not have staff available to communicate with residents to provide care which poses a potential risk to the residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 20, 2025

Plan of correction: Administrator/Licensee agrees to put in writing their plan for hiring or ensuring English Speaking staff are always on shift and submit the plan by the POC date. Additionally, Administrator shall submit an updated LIC500 to reflect all staff.

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR87211(a)(1)A,B&D · Plan of correction due date: May 27, 2025

87211(a)(1)A,B&D-Reporting Requirements: (a) Each licensee shall furnish to the licensing agency such reports... (1) A written report shall be submitted to the licensing agency and to the person... ... any of the events specified in (A), (B) & (D)... This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews and record reviews, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above by not notifying CCLD regarding R1's and R2's incident reports which poses a potential health and safety risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 20, 2025

Plan of correction: Licensee shall ensure a written report is submitted to the licensing agency and to the person responsible for the resident within seven (7) days of the occurrence of any of the events. R1's and R2's incident reports shall be submitted to LPA by POC date.

Mar 27, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff does not ensure medications are properly stored. Staff does not ensure food is properly stored. Staff does not ensure expired/ or rotten food are disposed. Staff does not ensure hazardous chemicals are properly stored Staff does not ensure dangerous items are properly stored.

At 9:00 AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Huma Rahimi conducted an unannounced initial complaint visit to this facility to investigate the above allegations. LPA met with staff Tynaibek Usupbaev and the staff contacted the Administrator via phone. LPA explained the reason for the visit. During course of the investigation, interviews and record review were made. At 9:10 AM, LPA requested client and staff roster. At 9:15 AM, LPA requested copies of pertinent information which include, but not limited to Staff Training, Dementia Program, Medication Policy and etc., relevant to the investigation. At approximately 9:25 AM, LPA conducted a physical plant tour. Between 9:40 AM – 1:45 PM, LPA conducted an interview with the Administrator, a staff, and five (5) out of five (5) residents. Continue on LIC 9099C Substantiated Staff does not ensure medications are properly stored. It was alleged that the facility left the keys in the medicine cabinet and unlocked medication in the refrigerator. On 01/06/2025 a credible witness conducted a visit to this facility and observed that the keys are left in the medicine cabinet and are not locked/secured. LPA conducted an interview with the Administrator who denied the allegation. Furthermore, during today’s visit LPA observed that the staff medications are unlocked in one of the kitchen cabinets and were accessible to residents in care. Additionally, LPA also observed that the key for the medication cabinet is visible and accessible in one of the kitchen drawers to residents in care. Based on credible witness and LPA’s observation during today’s visit this allegation is Substantiated. Staff does not ensure food is properly stored. It was alleged that the facility staff left food unsealed and open. On 01/06/2025 a credible witness conducted a visit to this facility and observed that food containers were left open. Additionally, on 03/10/2025, a credible witness conducted another visit and observed ice cream tub without a proper lid and a peanut butter jar open. LPA conducted an interview with the Administrator who confirmed that a peanut butter jar was open and unscrewed. Furthermore, during today’s visit LPA observed an ice cream tub open without a proper lid in the freezer. Based on credible witness, LPA’s observations during today’s visit, and the Administrator confirmation this allegation is Substantiated. Staff does not ensure expired/rotten food are disposed. It was alleged that the facility has expired/rotten food. On 01/06/2025 a credible witness conducted a visit to this facility and observed moldy tomatoes in the fridge. LPA conducted an interview with the Administrator who denied the allegation. However, during today’s visit LPA conducted a physical plant tour and observed wrinkled/aged chili peppers and expired milk with expiration date of 03/20/2025 in the refrigerator. Based on credible witness and LPA’s observations this allegation is Substantiated. Continue on LIC 9099C Staff does not ensure hazardous chemicals are properly stored. It was alleged that the facility left cleaning supplies in the cabinet under the sink unlocked and accessible to residents in care. On 01/06/2025, a credible witness conducted a visit to the facility and observed cleaning supplies unsecured and accessible. LPA conducted an interview with the Administrator who confirmed that the facility staff left laundry detergents unlocked and accessible to residents in care. Furthermore, during today’s visit, LPA conducted a physical plant tour of the facility and observed cleaning supplies unlocked and accessible under the bathroom sink to residents in care. Therefore, based on credible witness observation, Administrator interview, and LPA’s observation this allegation is Substantiated. Staff does not ensure dangerous items are properly stored. It was alleged that the facility staff left a knife on the kitchen counter and a lighter in an unsecured drawer. On 03/10/2025 a credible witness conducted a visit to this facility and observed unlocked knife and a lighter. LPA conducted an interview with the Administrator who denied the allegation. However, during today’s visit, LPA conducted a physical plant tour and observed a lighter in an unsecured kitchen drawer. Furthermore, LPA did not observe any knives or other sharp objects unlocked. Based on the credible witness and LPA’s observations this allegation is Substantiated. Deficiencies issued. Appeal rights discussed and given. Exit interview conducted. Copy of this report signed and delivered.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 27, 2025 · control 31-AS-20250318150547

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87309(a) · Plan of correction due date: Mar 28, 2025

87309 Storage Space and Access: (a) Except as specified in subsection (b), the licensee shall ensure that disinfectants, cleaning solutions, poisonous substances, knives, matches, tools, sharp objects..... pose a danger to residents are in locked storage and are not left unattended if outside the locked storage. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on the credible witness and LPA's observation, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in by leaving a lighter, a knife, and cleaning solutions accessible to residents in care which poses/posed an immediate health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 27, 2025

Plan of correction: Administrator will properly train staff to keep cleaning agents and chemicals inaccessible to residents and proof of training will be sent to LPA by the POC due date.

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87465(h)(2) · Plan of correction due date: Mar 28, 2025

87465 Incidental Medical & Dental Care (h) The following requirements shall apply to medications which are centrally stored: (2) Centrally stored medicines shall be kept in a safe & locked place… This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on the credible witness and LPA's observation, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in by leaving medications unlocked and accessible to residents in care which poses/posed an immediate health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 27, 2025

Plan of correction: Administrator agreed to schedule vendorized training for all staff by 03/28/25 and submit to CCL the vendor information and scheduled date of training. Training certifications to be submitted to CCL upon completion.

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87555(b)(28) · Plan of correction due date: Apr 3, 2025

87555(b)(28) General Food Service Requirements All food shall be protected against contamination. Contaminated food shall be discarded immediately upon discovery. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based credible witness and LPA's observations the Licensee did not comply by having old/rotten perishable foods and expired milk in the refrigerator which poses a potential health and safety risk to the residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 27, 2025

Plan of correction: The Administrator has agreed to remove and discard the rotten foods from the refrigerator. This part of the plan of correction met. Train all staff on food service and discarding rotten foods. Submit to CCL the staff sign in sheet and training material.

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87555(b)(15) · Plan of correction due date: Apr 3, 2025

General Food Service Requirements: The following food service requirements shall apply: 15) All persons engaged in food preparation and service shall observe personal hygiene and food services... ...which protect the food from contamination. This requirement is not met as evidence by Based on credible witness and LPA's observations the licensee did not comply with the section cited above by not properly securing the peanut butter jar and an ice cream tub which poses a potential health and safety risk to the persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 27, 2025

Plan of correction: Administrator will have in service training for current and new staff regarding this section 87555. Copy of in service training will be submitted to LPA.

20241 state visit · 1 document

Nov 1, 2024Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

An unannounced annual visit was conducted by Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Perchui Milena Khurshudyan on 11/01/2024 at 9:30 am. Upon arrival LPA met with Marasikova Damira, Caregiver, who granted access to the facility. LPA explained the reason for the visit. Shortly after the Facility Administrator, Marine Grigoryan arrived. LPA was informed that the facility currently has five (5) residents, of which two (2) residents are non-ambulatory. One (1) resident is on hospice and two (2) residents are receiving Home Health. Facility has waiver for 4 hospice residents. Resident Files: At 10:15am team conducted resident and staff records review. The following was observed. Five (5) out of 5 resident files were incomplete. Files were missing signed and completed Admissions agreements, Physician’s reports, resident preplacement appraisals/resident reappraisal, List of personal property, ID Emergency Sheets. Resident appraisals that were in the file did not have services explained and were missing signatures from the resident, and or responsible party. Please see LIC858 included with this report. Hospice and Home Health files are missing and or incomplete missing care plan, admissions, notes. Staff Files: The following was observed. There are no completed personnel records for all six (6) staff members which include the administrator. All files were missing personnel records (LIC501), Health Screening/TB results (LIC503), Documented medications and general training not completed. Please see LIC859 included with this report. With the assistance of the Licensee/administrator, a tour of the physical plant was initiated at approximately 11:00am and the following was observed: Continue on LIC809-C KITCHEN: The facility has a Kitchen area that is equipped with a refrigerator, microwave oven, dish washer and sink. The kitchen appliances and fixtures were functional. LPA found sufficient amount of two (2) days of perishable and seven (7) days of non-perishable food; emergency food was also stored inside the kitchen cabinets. LPA checked no expired food was found. Unsealed food was properly stored with labeled dates on them. LPA observed dining ware to accommodate a maximum capacity of six (6) residents. Knives and sharps were stored locked inside the kitchen cabinet. Kitchen chemicals and toxins are stored in the separate locket cabinet. Laundry machines are also located in the kitchen next to the staff bathroom and are always under supervision. COMMON AREAS: The facility maintains a comfortable temperature at 72°F. The living room and dining appeared clean and were properly furnished. No obstructions and or tripping hazards throughout the facility. LPA observed puzzles, books, balls, and board games to provide activities to residents in care. Living room has fireplace, which is properly fenced and not accessible to residents in care. Facility has land line, LPA checked its operational. MEDICATION: LPA observed medication, staff/resident files, and First Aid kept inside the locked cabinet located office area near the kitchen. LPA observed First-aid kit is complete and has new manual. Facility has Dementia Care Program. LPA observed each centrally stored prescription and PRN medication has been logged in the medications log. Proper medication dispensing instruction are followed and checked for contamination. All medications are properly labeled and checked for expiration dates. BEDROOMS: There are four (4) bedrooms designated for residents’ use. All bedrooms are furnished and well equipped with beds, nightstand, chair, dresser, bedding, and extra linen. Rooms were observed to have sufficient lighting and closet space. Facility has awake staff. Extra towels and linens were readily available and nicely stored in the linen closet located in the hallway. Facility has 2 staff for AM shift and 1 awake caregiver for PM shift. Continue on LIC809-C BATHROOMS: The facility has three (3) bathrooms, bathroom #1 is located next to the kitchen and it is designated for staff use, bathroom #2 is located in the hallway next to the bedrooms #1, and bathroom #3 is located inside bedroom #4. All bathrooms were observed to have the proper fixtures, grab bars, and non-skid mats. The hot water delivered in the bathrooms measured at 11:20am to be at 118°F degrees. All trash cans in bathrooms had fitted lids to protect from cross contamination. SMOKE DETECTORS/CARBON MONOXIDE. The smoke detectors and carbon monoxide are hard wired, inter-connected and were located throughout the facility. At 12:00pm they were tested and observed to be operational. The facility has one (1) new fire extinguishers that was purchased on 11/1/2024. The fire extinguisher is located in the hallway next to the kitchen. SURROUNDING GROUNDS: The backyard of the facility has sufficient yard space and it’s fenced. Exit areas are free of obstructions and hazards, exit gates were unlocked and easily accessible. LPA discussed the importance of maintaining the care and supervision to meet the needs of residents. The facility has a swimming pool which is properly fenced and locked. There is no garage. The following deficiencies were observed (see LIC809D) and cited from the California Code of Regulations, Title 22, and California Health and Safety Code. Failure to correct the deficiencies may result in civil penalties. LPA collected LIC500, LIC9020, and Liability Insurance. Exit interview conducted and copy of this report signed and delivered.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 1, 2024
Earlier years2021 to 2023 · 9 documents

20234 state visits · 5 documents

Aug 9, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility staff did not have the residents' medications locked. Facility staff did not speak English for emergency situations.

At 10:00am, Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Angela Panushkina and Christopher Alemoh conducted a subsequent visit to this facility to deliver final findings. LPA met with Hranush Khachatryan, Staff #1 (S1) who granted access to the facility. Administrator was contacted and the reason for the visit was explained. Administrator informed LPA that she's unable to come in and designated S1 to sign the report. During the initial visit conducted on 05/05/23, interviews and record review were made. At 10:10am, LPA met with the Administrator and requested resident and staff roster. At approximately 10:15am, LPA conducted a physical plant tour, to ensure health and safety of the residents are protected and physical plant is in compliance with Title 22 Regulations. At 11:00am, LPA requested copies of pertinent information which include, but not limited to Physician’s report, Appraisal Needs and Services Plan, Resident Appraisal, etc., relevant to the investigation. Between 10:25am – 12:30pm, LPA interviewed the Administrator, two (2) staff members and six (6) residents. Continue on LIC9099-C Unsubstantiated Allegation: Facility staff did not have the residents' medications locked. Regarding this allegation, LPA inspected the medication system, during the initial and today's visit. LPA observed that all the client medications are centrally stored, locked in a file cabinet by the kitchen, and inaccessible to the residents in care. Only the Administrator and staff have access to this cabinet. The key is kept with staff at all times. Also, during today's visit LPAs inspected the kitchen counter top, and other common areas and did not observe any medication in the open. Residents also did not have any medications stored in their bedrooms or bathrooms. Based on inspection of the physical plant, the allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. Allegation: Facility staff did not speak English for emergency situations. Although, during the initial visit (on 05/05/2023), LPA was unable to interview the identified staff members, LPA conducted interviews with four (6) out of six (6) residents and interviews revealed that staff was able to communicate and meet their needs and call paramedics for an immediate/emergency situation. Also, on 05/05/23 visit, LPA observed that Ms. Khachatryans (S1 and S2) English was limited, but they were still able to communicate. LPA asked them questions regarding their duties and procedures to take in case of emergencies, to which they were able to respond and communicate effectively. Based on the information obtained this allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 9, 2023 · control 31-AS-20230428164713
May 24, 2023Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff do not keep the facility free from mold

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Gary Tan conducted an unannounced initial complaint visit at this facility to investigate the above allegations. LPA met with Marine Grigoryan and explained the reason for the visit. LPA conducted physical plant tour at 9:32 AM, requested copies of facility documents relevant to the investigation at 9:46 AM and interviewed staff and residents between 10:00 AM to 12:30 PM. LPA also conducted record review between 12:30 PM to 1:30 PM. Regarding the allegation that the Staff do not keep the facility free from mold, it was alleged that the facility has molds. LPA's observation during physical plant tour at 9:32 AM revealed that the ceiling room #2 and kitchen's ceiling had leak and currently in disrepair. LPA also observed that there are black spots on the kitchen ceiling. Based on the information gathered during this visit, the allegation is deemed substantiated at this time. Citation issued. Appeal rights discussed and given. Exit interview conducted. Copy of this report issued. Substantiated (continued from LIC 9099-A) Regarding the allegation that the Staff do not keep the facility free from odor, it was alleged that the facility has foul smell, LPA's physical plant tour at today at 9:32 AM revealed that the facility is generally clean and not malodorous all over. LPA also toured each room at the facility and did not observe any foul smell on any of the rooms. Based on the information gathered during this visit, these allegations are deemed unsubstantiated at this time. Exit interview conducted. Copy of this report issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 24, 2023 · control 31-AS-20230519112325

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87303(a) · Plan of correction due date: May 31, 2023

The facility shall be clean, safe, sanitary and in good repair at all times. Maintenance shall include provision of maintenance services and procedures for the safety and well-being of residents, employees and visitors. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on LPA observation during physical plant tour, the licensee failed to ensure that the facility is in good repair which poses a potential health and safety risk to the residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 24, 2023

Plan of correction: The administrator agreed to have the ceiling repaired immediately and will submit proof of repair on or before the POC date.

May 5, 2023Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility staff did not have the Ombudsman poster posted. Facility staff did not have the facility license posted.

At 10:00am, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Angela Panushkina conducted an unannounced complaint visit to this facility to investigate the above allegations. LPA met with Staff #1 who granted access to the facility. Administrator and Staff #2 arrived at 10:10am and LPA explained the purpose of the visit. Allegation: Facility staff did not have the Ombudsman poster posted. During the visit conducted by the credible witness on 04/10/23 the facility did not have an Ombudsman poster posted. To investigate this allegation, LPA conducted an interview with the Administrator at 11:20am. During the interview, Administrator confirmed that the facility had no Ombudsman poster available due to the poster being damaged and removed in the beginning of March 2023. Administrator also informed LPA that a new poster was requested and provided by the Ombudsman on 04/10/23. During today’s visit LPA observed the poster being posted by the facility entryway. Based on interview with the Administrator this allegation is Substantiated at this time. Continue on LIC9099-C Substantiated Allegation: Facility staff did not have the facility license posted. It was alleged that the facility did not have facility license, issued by the Department of Social Services (DSS), posted. To investigate this allegation, LPA conducted an interview with the Administrator at 11:20am and was informed that the facility license along with other signs and forms were framed and posted on a board by the entrance. Interview with the Administrator revealed that in the beginning of March 2023 the board fell because the frames were heavy. During today's visit LPA observed the board was up and had signs posted. However, the facility license was still missing. Based on LPA's observation this allegation is Substantiated at this time. The following deficiencies are Substantiated. Pursuant to Title 22 Division 6 of the CA Code of Regulations, a deficiency was cited (refer to LIC9099-D). Exit interview conducted, Appeal Rights discussed, and a copy of this report signed and delivered.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 5, 2023 · control 31-AS-20230428164713

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87468.2(a)(10) · Plan of correction due date: May 12, 2023

Additional Personal Rights of Residents in Privately Operated Facilities (a) residents in…shall have all of the following personal rights: ... The licensee shall post the telephone numbers and addresses for the local offices of the … Ombudsman This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on observations, interviews the licensee did not comply with the section cited above by not having the Obudsman poster posted from middle of March 2023 until April 10th, 2023, which posed apontiential health, safety, or Personal rights risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 5, 2023

Plan of correction: Upon arrival LPA observed Ombudsman poster by the main entryway. Deficiency cleared during the visit.

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87113 · Plan of correction due date: May 12, 2023

Posting requirements: The license shall be posted in a prominent location in the licensed facility accessible to public view. This requirement was not met as evidenced by Based on observations made by LPA, during today's visit, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above. LPA did not observe license issued by the Department of Social Services being posted by the main entry door, which poses a potential health, safety risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 5, 2023

Plan of correction: Administrator agreed to post the facility license issued by the Department of Social Services by the entryway and proof of picture will be submitted to LPA by POC date.

The state marks this report as 4 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 3. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.

Mar 15, 2023Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not issue resident a refund.

On 3/15/2023 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Melissa Spaeth arrived at the facility to conduct a 10-day unannounced complaint visit and explained the purpose of the visit. Upon arrival, LPA was greeted by caregivers and LPA was allowed entrance to the facility. At approximately 10:45 a.m., licensee Artur Yezagelyan arrived to the facility. Allegation: Staff did not issue resident a refund. At 10:45 until 10:55 am. LPA conducted a physical plant tour. LPA interviewed Licensee from 11:00 am until 11:30 am and interviewed R1's family member from 11:30 am until 11:50 am LPA reviewed resident's files at 11:50 am until 12:15 pm. LPA interviewed the resident (R1) from 12:20 pm until 12:35 pm. During LPA's interview of the Administrator, Marine Grigoryan, Administrator stated received a referral from an agency regarding resident (R1). R1 moved into the facility the evening of 10/25/2022 but on 10/26/2022 Substantiated R1 decided no longer wanted to live at the facility and left on 10/26/2022. Administrator stated a signed Admissions Agreement was not received prior to the arrival of the resident. R1 stated upon arrival to the facility, R1 gave a cashier's check to the caregiver. Administrator stated did not remember if caregiver had received the cashier's check but checked bank records which confirmed the check was received. LPA interviewed R1's family member who stated a cashier's check was prepared by R1's bank and the family member gave R1 the check and R1 placed the check in R1's pocket. LPA Spaeth interviewed the resident (R1) on 3/15/2022 at 12:30 pm via phone call who stated gave a cashier’s check to the caregiver on the evening of 10/25/2022. LPA asked if R1 received a refund from the facility and R1 stated no. Based upon LPA's interview of the Administrator, R1 and R1's family member, the allegation, staff did not issue resident a refund is substantiated. Pursuant to Title 22 Division 6 of the CA Code of Regulations, a deficiency was cited (refer to LIC 9099-D). Exit interview conducted, Appeal Rights discussed, and a copy of the report was issues to Administrator.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 15, 2023 · control 31-AS-20230308152917

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87507(c) · Plan of correction due date: Mar 20, 2023

87507 Admissions Agreement (c) Admission agreements shall be signed and dated, acknowledging the contents of the document, by the resident or the resident’s representative if any and the licensee…no later than seven days following admissions. This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on LPA's interviews of the resident, resident's famly member and Administrator, the Admissions Agreement was not signed by the resident and a payment of $2,500.00 was received by facility staff when R1 moved into the facility.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 15, 2023

Plan of correction: Administrator will send a refund check to the Resident and send a copy of the refund check to LPA Spaeth via email..

Mar 15, 2023Facility evaluation reportCase Management - DeficienciesDeficiency pages: Type A

Type of visit: Case Management - Deficiencies

LPA Spaeth conducted an announced visit to conduct a investigation of Complaint #31-AS-20230308152917. During LPA's visit, LPA observed caregivers were not wearing a mask. Also, LPA observed two bottles of beer in the refrigerator. LPA explained to caregivers facility staff must wear masks and alcohol beverages cannot be available within the facility. Upon LPA's arrival, LPA asked for caregivers names to determine if staff has been fingerprinted, cleared and associated to the facility. LPA requested the on duty LPA at the Woodland Hills Regional Office to check within Guardian for confirmation the caregivers have been fingerprinted and cleared. The On duty LPA stated one caregiver had been cleared but the other caregiver's application was incomplete. LPA reminded that anyone working directly with residents must receive clearance prior to their start date. Immediate civil penalty of one hundred dollars ($100) per day has been issued. The following deficiencies are substantiated. Pursuant to Title 22 Division 6 of the CA Code of Regulations, a deficiency was cited (refer to LIC 809-D). Exit interview conducted, Appeal Rights discussed, and a copy of the report was issues to Administrator.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 15, 2023

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87470(a)(5) · Plan of correction due date: Mar 15, 2023

87470 infection Control Requirements. (a) A licensee shall ensure that infection control practices are maintained..: (5) All staff... .. shall practice and maintain respiratory etiquette….to minimize exposure to potential illness. .. This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Upon entering the facility, LPA observed staff member was not wearing a mask which poses an immediate health and safety risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 15, 2023

Plan of correction: During LPA's visit, LPA observed caregivers immediately placed mask while working in the facility. LPA advised staff that all staff are required to wear masks when in the facility.

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR87705(f)(2) · Plan of correction due date: Mar 15, 2023

87705 Care of Persons with Dementia. The following items shall be made inaccessible to residents with dementia: Over-the-counter medication, nutritional supplements or vitamins, alcohol, ...and disinfectants. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on todays observation, two bottles of beer were found accessible in the facilitly refrigerator. This poses an immediate health risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 15, 2023

Plan of correction: Caregivers removed the alcohol from the refrigerator and removed it from the facility which made it inaccessible

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87355(e)(1) · Plan of correction due date: Mar 15, 2023

87355 (e)(1) Criminal record Clearance All individuals subject to a criminal record review pursuant to Health & Safety Code Section 1569.17(b) shall prior to working... in a licensed facility: (1) obtain a California clearance or a criminal record excemption as required by the Dept..... This requirement is not met as evidenced by: LPA observed a caregiver assisting R1 in the living room. Caregiver working at the facility prior to obtaining criminal record clearance which poses an immediate health and safety risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 15, 2023

Plan of correction: This is a zero tolerance violation. Caregiver was sent home during the visit. LPA stated to Caregiver they cannot come back until they are cleared and associated. Immediate civil penalty of R1 100 X1 day has been issued for a total of $100.

20222 state visits · 2 documents

Nov 9, 2022Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff refuse to refund preadmission fee to resident's authorized representative

At 2:45 p.m. on 11/09/2022, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Nicholas Reed conducted an unannounced complaint visit. LPA met with Administrator and disclosed the reason for the visit. Regarding the allegation above, it was alleged that Person #1 (P1) paid $500 for a potential resident’s pre-admission fee and did not receive a refund. LPA interviewed P1 at 8:23 a.m. on 11/09/2022. LPA interviewed the Administrator at approximately 3:00 p.m. on 11/09/2022. From interviews, P1 and their resident never entered the facility after finding out the resident was unfit for assisted living and needed a skilled nursing facility. P1 was not informed of the facility’s refund policy regarding pre-admission fees. Based on interviews, Based on observations, the allegation is deemed SUBSTANTIATED at this time. Deficiency is cited on LIC 9099-D. Exit interview conducted. Copy of report provided. Appeal rights discussed. Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 9, 2022 · control 31-AS-20221108084148

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: HSC 1569.651 · Plan of correction due date: Dec 9, 2022

§1569.651 Preadmission fee (g) If the applicant decides not to enter the facility prior to the facility’s completion of a preadmission appraisal or if the facility fails to provide full written disclosure of the preadmission fee charges and refund conditions, the applicant shall be entitled to a refund of 100 percent of the preadmission fee. Based on interviews, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in 1 out of 1 preadmission fees which poses a potential risk to the Heatlh, Safety, or Personal Rights of persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 9, 2022

Plan of correction: Licensee refunded P1's money during visit. POC cleared.

Sep 29, 2022Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

At 10:20 a.m. on 09/29/2022, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Nicholas Reed conducted an unannounced annual visit. LPA met with staff and disclosed the reason for the visit. LPA and staff toured the facility inside and out. The facility was last visited on 10/19/2021 for a case management visit. It is a single story building with 4 bedrooms, 3 bathrooms, kitchen, pool, common areas, and outdoor areas. It has an approved fire clearance for 6 residents, of which 4 may be non-ambulatory and 1 may be bedridden in Bedroom #4. The facility serves residents with dementia. Approved hospice waivers for 4. LPA observed a sign posted at the front for “No Smoking – Oxygen in Use”. LPA was screened for infectious disease upon entry. LPA signed in on the visitor log, Staff added columns on the visitor log to track temperature, symptoms, and vaccination status during the visit. Postings at the main entrance included confidential complaint contacts, emergency contacts, personal rights, facility license, non-discrimination policy, and COVID precautions. The facility had 4 bedrooms. 1 is private and 3 are shared. All bedrooms contained a chair, nightstand, lamp, storage, and bed with adequate bedding. All furnishings were clean and in good condition. Beds in shared rooms were at least 6 feet apart for social distancing. LPA observed 7 beds in the facility, and staff confirmed that only 6 will be used. Staff confirmed their understanding of their capacity limitation. Bedroom #4 was cleared for a bedridden resident. Bedroom #4 was vacant. The fire door to Bedroom #4 is not properly suspended with a magnet. Instead, the fire door was shut. LPA explained to staff that the door must be suspended by a magnet and secured properly before a resident moved in to the room. At approximately 10:35 a.m. LPA observed an auditory alarm removed from the rear sliding door. Staff confirmed it was broken. Outside, LPA observed a pool gate without a lock, 6 paint cans near the pool, and a storage shed with cleaning solutions unlocked and accessible. Staff locked the pool gate, placed the paint cans in storage, and locked the storage shed. Ramps and handrails were in good condition. Fireplace was covered appropriately. The facility had 3 bathrooms. All bathrooms contained liquid soap, handwashing instruction sign, trash can with a tight fitting lid, grab bars near the toilet and shower, and a non-skid mat in the shower. Staff stated that toilet paper and paper towels are provided with each use due to residents with impulse control issues. At 10:40 a.m. LPA measured the water temperature in the private bathroom of Bedroom #4 to be 120 degrees Fahrenheit. Walls, floors, ceilings, windows, screens, and blinds were clean and in good repair. At 10:50 a.m. LPA measured the room temperature to be 76 degrees Fahrenheit. LPA observed an adequate supply of perishable and non-perishable food in the kitchen. At 10:52 a.m. LPA measured the refrigerator and freezer temperatures to be 40 and 0 degrees Fahrenheit, respectively. Kitchen appliances were sanitary and functional. Sharps were locked below the counter top. A washer and dryer in good condition were located near the kitchen. At approximately 10:54 a.m. a cleaning solution was found in the bathroom adjacent to the kitchen. Staff immediately locked the cleaning solution in the storage shed. All emergency exit paths were free from obstructions. Exit gates were unlocked with inward facing latches. Emergency Disaster Plan posted at the front. At 11:16 a.m. staff tested the dual-purpose carbon monoxide and smoke detectors in Bedroom #4 to be operable. Detectors were hardwired and functioned simultaneously. An additional verbal alert sounded when detector was tested. At 10:30 a.m. LPA observed a fully charged fire extinguisher near the kitchen, It was purchased on 09/30/2021 and had a receipt attached. During today's inspection, the facility was not in compliance with Title 22 regulations. Citations issued on LIC 809-D page. Exit interview conducted. Copy of report, appeal rights, and citations issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 29, 2022

The state marks this report as 5 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 4. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.

20212 state visits · 2 documents

Oct 19, 2021Facility evaluation reportCase Management - OtherReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Other

At 9:01 AM on 10/19/2021, Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Nicholas Reed and Tuesday Cabinness and Fire Inspector Linsay Pellegrini met with Administrator Marine Grigoryan for an announced Case Management visit. Administrator intended to show the recommended modifications since the recent Prelicensing visit on 09/30/2021. LPAs and Fire Inspector toured the facility inside and out and inside the Additional Dwelling Unit (ADU). LPAs observed the changes made throughout the facility. The open outlet between Bedrooms #3 and #4 was covered. LPAs observed 3 non-slip mats in the Bathroom adjacent to Bedroom #1, the bathroom nearest the kitchen, and the bathroom adjacent to Bedroom #4. LPAs also saw the microwave was mounted and installed in the kitchen. A black grate now covers the fireplace opening. LPAs observed a sufficiently large Personal Rights poster, an Emergency Exit posting, and instructions for residents to issue confidential complaints posted at the front door. LPA Reed observed 4 nightlights in the facility. They were present in a bathroom, a bedroom, and the hall. Administrator showed LPA Reed the new First Aid kit with tweezers, scissors, thermometer, and a manual. LPAs observed a toilet paper rack in Bathroom adjacent to Bedroom #1. LPAs also observed a bed set up in Bedroom #1 with sheets, blankets, linens, and pillows. Administrator showed the new facility sketch designating an Additional Dwelling Unit (ADU) with a separate address of 18837 West Lemay Street, Reseda CA 91335. LPA Reed will submit this new sketch to the Central Applications Bureau. LPAs observed a Certificate of Occupancy for the ADU and took a photo. ---- This is an amended report to remove confidential information ---- LPA Reed advised Administrator to submit a new STD 850. Administrator will submit a new STD 850 to LPA Reed via email. ADU inspection: LPAs observed black address numbers posted on ADU reading 18837. LPAs toured inside the ADU and observed a kitchen, bathroom, a bedroom and living room. LPAs observed zero residents inside. Administrator told LPAs the ADU is inhabited by Marine Grigoryan and S1 who are fingerprint cleared and associated with Palace of Joy, Inc. LPA Reed told both Marine and S1 that anyone intending to live in the ADU must be fingerprint cleared and associated with Palace of Joy, Inc. prior to living there. This holds especially true if any form of rental agreement, with or without payment, is signed. Administrator asked if visitors may stay in the ADU temporarily. LPA Reed advised that if they are not fingerprint cleared and associated with Palace of Joy, Inc. they may not step foot outside or inside the facility.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 19, 2021
Sep 30, 2021Facility evaluation reportPrelicensingReport on file

Type of visit: Prelicensing

Licensing Program Analysts (LPA) Nicholas Reed and Tuesday Cabinness arrived to Palace of Joy (#197610152) at 1:10PM on 09/30/2021 and met with Administrator Marine Grigoryan for an announced Pre-Licensing Inspection. LPAs toured the physical plant inside and out. LPAs observed medications locked in a separate storage area. LPAs observed the walls, wallpaper, paint, and ceiling in good condition. LPAs observed windows and blinds in operating condition, yet not all windows had screens. LPAs advised to put screens on all windows. LPAs observed clean floors with no rugs. LPAs observed all doors as operational, yet LPAs told Administrator to replace screen on the screen door in the dining room. LPAs observed equipment and supplies stored away from common areas. LPAs saw smoke detectors functioning properly and fire extinguisher is fully charged. LPAs observed furniture in good repair and cleaning supplies and hazardous items locked outdoors. LPAs observed no firearms nor ammunition. LPAs tested handrails which were securely fastened. LPAs noticed hallways and doors were unobstructed. LPAs observed no immediate hazards on the premises. LPAs observed unobstructed hallways. LPAs observed a hole in the wall which needs covering. LPAs sensed all rooms were odorless. LPAs sensed room temperatures between 68 and 85 degrees. LPAs observed a locked gate and fence around the pool. LPAs observed no flies or vermin in the facility. LPAs observed an adequate number of bedrooms present to accommodate residents. LPAs observed secure and non-slippery ramps. LPAs noticed incongruences among the facility sketch and the physical plant, so LPAs requested Administrator submit a new facility sketch. LPAs observed adequate closet space and drawers in bedrooms, along with sheets, pillows, pillow cases, blankets, and mattress pads. However, only 2 beds were set up in bedroom #2 and in no other bedrooms. LPAs advised Administrator to set up mattresses, beddings, and arrangements prior to residents’ arrival. LPAs toured bathrooms and observed clean toilets, sinks and showers. LPAs required Administrator put non-slip mats in the showers and tubs. LPAs observed sinks operating properly, secure grab bars, and a sufficient supply of towels and wash cloths. LPAs saw ample supplies of personal hygiene and linens for residents. LPAs observed the kitchen to be free of cleaning supplies and pesticides. LPAs observed non-perishable food supply adequate for less than one week and no perishable food. LPAs advised Administrator to increase food supply. LPAs observed a lid on a large trash can, and two trash cans in a drawer. LPAs also observed clean and plenty of plates, cups, bowls, and utensils. LPAs observed a microwave which was not installed, and a vent hole which was open. Administrator stated that the microwave will be installed soon and hole will be covered. LPAs observed a confidential file cabinet. LPAs observed postings for personal rights on the wall, but LPAs did not observe Emergency Exit route or procedures for filing complaints. LPAs told Administrator to post Emergency Exit plans throughout the house, as well as a procedure for filing confidential complaints. LPAs observed activity supplies and card games. LPAs reviewed the outdoor activity area for residents and determined it must be revised. LPA Reed will consult on fencing requirements between garage and main facility. LPAs observed dressings and bandages in a First Aid Kit, but LPAs did not see tweezers, thermometer, scissors, nor first aid manual. LPAs requested Administrator complete the first aid kit with the aforementioned items. LPAs observed washer and dryer near the kitchen. LPAs noted a working telephone. LPAs noted emergency flashlights and batteries but did not see night lights in outlets. LPAs recommended putting night lights in all rooms and hallways. Facility does not have vehicle for residents. LPA Cabinness completed Component III with Administrator.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 30, 2021

5 of 6 beds were occupied at the August 25, 2026 state visit — a count on that day, not an opening.

License holder

Palace of Joy, Inc., licensed since 2021.

The state’s totals for this licenseSince 2021, as the state’s facility page counts them
State visits on file
21
Total complaints
10
Substantiated allegations
12
Type A citations
2
Type B citations
9

These are the state’s own totals for this license since 2021, per CDSS records. The state counts them apart from the documents above, and they can differ from what those documents show; the documents say what each visit found. One complaint can contain several allegations.

Compare with homes the same size
This homeTypical
Type A citations20
Type B citations90
Substantiated allegations120
Total complaints100

“Typical” is the statewide median for licensed homes this size. It does not adjust for years licensed, and older licenses have had more visits and reports. The median is across the 6,916 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record. The figures compared are the state’s totals, not the documents.

What the state’s words mean
Routine visita visit the state records as “Required” — a scheduled visit, not one made in answer to a complaintSubstantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedthere was not enough evidence to prove a violation occurred — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe evidence showed the allegation was false, could not have happened, or had no reasonable basisType A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗

An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents stand in their place.

Open CDSS facility search ↗Report a record errorOperate this home? Respond or correct, free →
Frequently asked questions

A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

Quick answers about Palace of Joy

Is Palace of Joy licensed?

The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.

How many residents is Palace of Joy licensed for?

6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.

Has Palace of Joy been cited?

2 Type A and 9 Type B citations since 2021, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. Those records count 21 state visits over the same years.

Is Palace of Joy still open?

This license was on the CDSS roster as of November 11, 2026.

What does Palace of Joy cost?

$5,050 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $4,150–$6,250. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 15 small homes within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

Among 232 other homes of a similar licensed size across Los Angeles County that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $4,000 to $6,151 a month, and the middle figure is $5,000 (n = 232 other homes publishing a starting rate).

Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date between September and October 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.

A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.

The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.

A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.

Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out. What Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver covers in a care home.

Does Palace of Joy take Medi-Cal?

On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home appears on the DHCS participation list, October 1, 2026. Confirm eligibility and current participation with the program. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.

Who holds the license?

The license is held by Palace of Joy, Inc., per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. See the homes licensed to Palace of Joy, Inc. — at least 2 on the state roster.

Is there a hospital nearby?

Providence Cedars-Sinai Tarzana Medical Center is 1.6 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.

Can Palace of Joy keep a resident on hospice?

Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 4 residents, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.

Palace of Joy license and inspection record

  • Name on the license: “PALACE OF JOY”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
  • License #197610152. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
  • Licensed for 6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
  • Licensed to Palace of Joy, Inc., per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
  • First licensed in 2021, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
  • 21 state inspection visits since 2021, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
  • 2 Type A and 9 Type B citations on file since 2021, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. The same records count 21 state visits in that period.
  • 10 complaints and 12 substantiated allegations on file since 2021, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
  • The most recent state visit on file is September 2, 2026, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Type A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗

See the state’s own record

Nearby

Other homes nearby

Licensed homes near this one in Los Angeles County, most information on file first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.

  • Map

    Reseda · 0.3 mi

    Eisenberg Vlg of the La Jewish Home for the Aging

    Large community · licensed for 271

    Estimated starting rate

    $4,200 a month to start

    Covelight estimate · likely $3,250–$5,350

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record
    • Hospice: on the state record
  • Map

    Reseda · 0.3 mi

    Fountainview at Eisenberg Village

    Large community · licensed for 216

    Estimated starting rate

    $4,350 a month to start

    Covelight estimate · likely $3,350–$5,500

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record
    • Hospice: on the state record
  • Map

    Reseda · 0.5 mi

    All Comfort Board and Care

    Small home · licensed for 6

    Estimated starting rate

    $5,050 a month to start

    Covelight estimate · likely $4,150–$6,200

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record
    • Hospice: on the state record
    • Bedridden: on the state record
  • Map

    Reseda · 0.6 mi

    Assisted Senior Care Facility

    Small home · licensed for 6

    Estimated starting rate

    $5,150 a month to start

    Covelight estimate · likely $4,250–$6,350

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record
    • Hospice: on the state record
    • Bedridden: on the state record
  • Map

    Reseda · 0.7 mi

    Eclipse Senior Care

    Small home · licensed for 6

    Estimated starting rate

    $4,950 a month to start

    Covelight estimate · likely $4,050–$6,100

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record
    • Hospice: on the state record
    • Bedridden: on the state record
  • Map

    Reseda · 0.7 mi

    Harmony Home Senior Care

    Small home · licensed for 6

    Estimated starting rate

    $5,350 a month to start

    Covelight estimate · likely $4,400–$6,600

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record
    • Dementia: on the state record
    • Hospice: on the state record
    • Bedridden: on the state record

Street maps © Protomaps · © OpenStreetMap

Explore Los Angeles County ↗

Do you run this home?

Add your photos, care details, and contact information. Your public profile is free.

Claim this home
Visiting in person? Print a visit sheetHow we source information
CallAsk this home
PJ

Call Palace of Joy

Reseda · Licensed for 6

(747) 265-6536

From the state licensing record · October 26, 2026

From the home’s website, seniorfacilitycare.com:

(310) 779-4433 · main line · seen October 5, 2026

marinegrig@yahoo.com · general email · seen October 5, 2026

or

Let us do the legwork

  • We ask about availability, price and the care you describe.
  • If it’s a fit, you choose whether they call you. Either way, you get every answer.
Check availabilityFree

Ask Palace of Joy

Check availability

Request a tour

More days
  • AskThe cost, or your own question

Free for families. A home gets your number only if you say yes.

Covelight Care

A free directory of every licensed care home in California, built from CDSS public records.

Find your next step

Find a homeSaved homesHelp me chooseCheck a home

Make sense of care

Care guidesMedi-Cal & careYour rightsHow we workAbout this site

Work with Covelight

For professionalsFor home operatorsSuggest a correctionDevelopersContact us

© 2026 Covelight Care LLC. Homes never pay to appear or rank higher.

Covelight Care is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the sources named on this page.

3104 O St Unit #1023, Sacramento, CA 95816

PrivacyTermsText messages