Illustration — no photo of this home on file yet

Fountainview at Eisenberg Village

Large community·Licensed for 216·Reseda, California

Licensed since 2010Licence #197607880
  • Care approvals on fileWheelchair · HospiceState licensing record · September 13, 2026
  • Estimated starting rate$4,200 a monthCovelight estimate · likely $3,300–$5,350
  • Home sizeLicensed for 216Large care community · a licensed care home (RCFE)
  • Room at the last state visit105 of 216 beds occupiedJuly 7, 2026 · not a current opening
  • Ways to payAsk the homeMedi-Cal ALW participation not on file
  • Last state visitJuly 7, 2026CDSS inspection record

Fountainview at Eisenberg Village is a large care community in Reseda — a licensed residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE), the licence category behind “assisted living” and “board and care.” It is licensed for 216 residents since 2010. Dementia care and bedridden care are not on file.

Built from CDSS public records · September 13, 2026. Every fact below names its source and date.

Quick answers and the state record

A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

Quick answers about Fountainview at Eisenberg Village

Is Fountainview at Eisenberg Village licensed?

The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

How many residents is Fountainview at Eisenberg Village licensed for?

216 residents — a large community, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

Has Fountainview at Eisenberg Village been cited?

0 Type A and 0 Type B citations since 2010, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. Those records count 10 state visits over the same years.

Is Fountainview at Eisenberg Village still open?

This license was on the CDSS roster as of September 28, 2026.

What does Fountainview at Eisenberg Village cost?

$4,200 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $3,300–$5,350. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 10 communities with 50 or more beds within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

Among 121 other homes of a similar licensed size across Los Angeles County that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $3,094 to $5,961 a month, and the middle figure is $4,195 (n = 121 other homes publishing a starting rate).

Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.

A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.

The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.

A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.

Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.

Does Fountainview at Eisenberg Village take Medi-Cal?

On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.

Who holds the license?

The license is held by Fountainview at Eisenberg Vlg, LLC.& Evlajha, Inc., per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

Is there a hospital nearby?

Providence Cedars-Sinai Tarzana Medical Center is 1.4 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.

Can Fountainview at Eisenberg Village keep a resident on hospice?

Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 20 residents, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

Fountainview at Eisenberg Village license and inspection record

  • Name on the license: “FOUNTAINVIEW AT EISENBERG VILLAGE”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
  • License #197607880. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • Licensed for 216 residents — a large community, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • Licensed to Fountainview at Eisenberg Vlg, LLC.& Evlajha, Inc., per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • First licensed in 2010, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • 10 state inspection visits since 2010, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • 0 Type A and 0 Type B citations on file since 2010, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. The same records count 10 state visits in that period.
  • 5 complaints and 0 substantiated allegations on file since 2010, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
  • The most recent state visit on file is July 7, 2026, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
Type A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗

See the state’s own record

Can they support the care needed?

California licenses a home for specific kinds of care. The state’s record lists what this home is approved for; the home’s own answers fill in what changes as needs change.

  • Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved · covers up to 216 residents
  • Dementia / memory careNot on file · ask the home
  • Hospice careApproved · covers up to 20 residents
  • BedriddenNot on file · ask the home

State licensing record · September 13, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.

Read the state’s own wording
216 NON-AMBULATORY. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 20.

938 - CONTINUE CARE CONTRACT (CCC)

CDSS record, verbatim · September 13, 2026

As needs change

  • Staying through hospice

    Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 20 — care may continue at the end of life

    Ask: “If hospice is needed, can care continue here until the end?”

    State licensing record · September 13, 2026

4 more questions to ask the home
  • Two-person transfers or a lift

    Not on file

    Ask: “If two people or a lift are needed to transfer, can the person stay?”

  • Someone awake overnight

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?”

  • Medicines

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who manages the medicines, and what happens when a dose is missed?”

  • If memory loss develops

    Dementia-care designation not on file

    Ask: “If memory loss develops, what would change — and when would a move be needed?”

What it costs here

Covelight estimate

$4,200a month to start

Likely $3,300–$5,350

From 10 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file

Likely monthly total

$4,200a month

Likely $3,300–$5,500

With a studio and basic help.

An estimate for planning, not a quote. The price is made in the phone call.

See the full cost breakdownRoom, care and fees · how people pay · how this estimate works
Room
Daily care
Sharing the room

Memory care is not priced here: a dementia-care designation is not on file for this home. Ask the home.

  • Starting monthly rate$4,200likely $3,300–$5,350

    Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 10 communities with 50 or more beds within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

  • Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600

    Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (45 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).

  • One-time move-in fee$2,000one time · likely $0–$4,000

    Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,000 (134 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.

Likely monthly totalLikely $3,300–$5,500
$4,200
First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $4,000–$8,600
$6,200
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
  • Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
  • Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
  • SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
  • VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
  • Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
  • MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
If the money runs out, what Medi-Cal covers
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
  • The care level

    Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.

  • What is billed separately

    Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.

  • Move-in costs

    A one-time community fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.

  • Increases

    California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.

  • What is the full monthly cost for the room and care we need, and what does it include?
  • What would the next care level cost, and who decides when it changes?
  • What is billed separately, and is there a one-time fee or deposit at move-in?
  • Is any private-pay period required before another payment program can begin?
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 10 communities with 50 or more beds within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

10 homes like this within 5 miles publish starting rates mostly between $2,800–$8,050.

  • Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
  • Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
  • Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
  • Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
  • We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
  • It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Show the 10 nearby homes behind this estimate

Where it is

  • 6440 Wilbur Avenue, Reseda, CA 91335Address from the public record · September 13, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.

Opening the neighborhood map…

The state record

California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. Here are the dated documents and the state’s own words, beside what is typical for homes this size.

Since 2022, the state has filed 10 documents for this home, and its records count 10 visits since 2010. The most recent — a complaint investigation report on July 7, 2026 — closed with the state’s outcome word: “Unfounded.”

On file since
2022
State visits
10
Most recent visit
July 7, 2026
Occupied at that visit
105 of 216 bedsa count on that day, not an opening

We hold 5 complaint reports the state published for this home, dated February 4, 2022 to July 7, 2026. 5 of the 5 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Unfounded” (1), “Unsubstantiated” (4). 5 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word. Summary composed by computer from the 5 complaint reports below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

Beside homes the same size

  • Type A citations0typical 0
  • Type B citations0typical 1
  • Substantiated allegations0typical 2
  • Total complaints5typical 6

“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,354 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this licence since 2010.

Year by year
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated20263302025110202433020231102022220

The last 36 months — 7 of 10 documents

20263 state visits · 3 documents
Jul 7, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Staff are not providing adequate food service to resident Staff are not meeting resident's needs

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Quoc Huynh conducted an initial complaint visit for the above allegations. The LPA arrived at 1:23PM and met with Executive Director (ED) Kathleen Glass and Director of Health Services (DHS) Clarissa Townes. Entrance interview conducted. Between 1:48PM and 2:13PM, the LPA conducted a physical plant tour, interviewed one (1) resident, and reviewed and obtained pertinent documents. The following was then determined: Report Continued on LIC 9099-C Unfounded Allegations: “Staff are not providing adequate food service to resident” and “Staff are not meeting resident's needs” It was reported that a staff was not assisting Resident #1 (R1) with meals and was not attentive to R1’s needs. Interview with R1 confirmed that the staff is not associated with the facility and is a private caregiver. They further reported that the private caregiver is “difficult, not nice, and mean” in addition to not treating R1 gently. R1 did not have concerns about their assistance with meals and stated that the facility provides adequate meals throughout the day. Record review confirmed the private caregiver is not directly employed by the facility. Based on the information obtained, the allegations are deemed UNFOUNDED at this time. A finding of unfounded means that the allegations are either false, could not have happened, and/or are without a reasonable basis. The LPA, ED, and DHS had a discussion on following up with the appropriate agency that employed the private caregiver and they agreed. No deficiency cited. Exit interview conducted. A copy of the report was reviewed and provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 7, 2026 · control 29-AS-20260703095137
Jun 10, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff mismanage resident's medication

At 10:00 A.M, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Valeria Conway conducted an unannounced 10-day complaint investigation visit to the facility listedabove. LPA met with Executive Director (ED), Kahtleen Glass and Director of Health Care Services, Clarissa Townes and the reason for the visit was explained. Entrance interview conducted. During today's visit, the LPA conducted a physical plant tour of the community starting at approximately 10:50 A.M. Between 10:15 A.M. and 1:30 P.M. LPA interviewed the the ED, the Director of Heath Care Services, the Med Tech on duty, Resident #1’s (R1’s) family members, a private caregiver and the Kaiser Hospice Registered Nurse (RN). Additionally, LPA gathered copies of pertinent documents. Throughout the course of the investigation, the LPA reviewed all documents obtained and the following was then determined: Continued from LIC 9099-C Unsubstantiated Continued from LIC 9099 Regarding allegation of “Staff mismanage resident’s medication” it was reported that during a routine hospice visit, the Kaiser Hospice Registered Nurse (RN) observed that liquid morphine drawn from the medication bottle appeared altered, noting a difference in color and a fruity odor. Interviews conducted with family members stated that R1 receives hospice care and 24-hour care from several private caregivers in addition with support from facility's care staff. They expressed satisfaction with services provided by this facility. Family members revealed that R1’s medication are not stored, safeguarded, or managed by the facility. Interview with the RN revealed that R1 has been receiving hospice services at this facility for approximately two (2) years. The RN stated that throughout that time there have been no previous concerns regarding missing or tampered medications and confirmed that facility staff have not been responsible for storing, safeguarding, refilling or administering R1’s medication. Interviews with the ED and the Director of Health Care Services confirmed that R1’s medications are managed and dispensed by Kaiser hospice personnel and are not maintained by the facility and/or facility staff. Adding, that facility has a list of medication on file for R1; however, facility does not maintain records of medication administration or dosages dispensed for R1. Based on interviews conducted, all parties consistently reported that facility staff are not responsible for the storage, safeguarding, or administration of R1’s medication. Records reviewed revealed that R1 receives 24 hour one-to-one (1:1) care provided by caregivers hired by the family. Medication management responsibilities are overseen by R1's designated Power of Attorney (POA). There was insufficient evidence to support the allegation or that a violation occurred; therefore, the allegations “Staff mismanage resident’s medication” is deemed unsubstantiated at this time. Exit interview conducted. No citations issued. A copy of this report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 10, 2026 · control 29-AS-20260602181714
Jan 21, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Quoc Huynh arrived unannounced at 9:36AM for a required one-year visit. The LPA met with the Executive Director (ED) Kathleen Glass and Director of Health Services (DHS) Clarissa Townes and explained the reason for the visit. Entrance interview conducted. At 10:15AM, the LPA, ED, Business Administrator, and Director of Maintenance toured the physical plant areas inside and outside to ensure there are no health and safety hazards, and facility is in compliance with Title 22 Regulations. The following was observed: RESIDENT ROOMS: The LPA observed ten (10) randomly selected rooms on four (4) floors and no immediate health or safety hazards were observed. Appropriate furniture was also observed in each unit. Restrooms were clean, with properly installed grab-bars in resident bathrooms and non-skid strips in shower tubs. Water temperature was tested throughout the units and measured between 115.3 degrees F and 120 degrees F, which is within the required range. At 11:03AM, the LPA tested the facility’s call system pendant with staff response at 11:05AM. Report Continued on LIC 809-C COMMON AREAS: The facility had five (5) total floors. The basement contained the parking garage, theater, and emergency food and water. The first floor contained resident apartments, fitness center, spa, lobby/concierge, library, coffee bar, business offices, events center, creative arts room, private dining room, lounge, dining room, and kitchen. The second, third, and fourth floors each had resident apartments and lounges. LPA Huynh observed common areas to be clean, clear of obstructions/hazards, and furniture were in good condition. Required postings were observed in the lobby. KITCHEN: The facility’s commercial kitchen was inspected and found to be in compliance with Title 22 regulations. Facility uses third party vendors and receives general food deliveries three (3) times a week and protein deliveries daily. There was a sufficient supply of perishable and non-perishable food. The LPA observed the walk-in refrigerator and freezer; food appeared to be of good quality and labeled with expiration dates. Kitchen sinks had signage of tap water delivering above 125 degrees F. MEDICATION: Medication review began at 11:36AM. The LPA reviewed medications for six (6) residents. Medications were maintained inaccessible to residents in the medication room located on the fourth floor. Resident medications reviewed were documented and stored in compliance with regulation at this time. OUTDOOR AREA: The facility’s outdoor area consisted of four (4) courtyards with one (1) water fountain. The facility also shares outdoor space with Eisenberg Village and a Nursing School. Residents have the option of utilizing the common spaces offered at the connected facility. The exterior perimeter was secured with gates and held multiple emergency exits. All passageways were clear of obstructions. Report Continued on LIC 809-C RECORDS: Record review began at 12:41PM. LPA Huynh reviewed ten (10) resident records for, but not limited to admissions agreements, medical assessment, appraisals, and consent forms. Seven (7) residents did not have consent forms, and four (4) residents did not have signed personal rights. The ED and DHS stated they plan to provide all residents with new forms to complete. The LPA reviewed ten (10) personnel records for, but not limited to job application, health assessments, TB results, criminal record statements and clearances, first aid/CPR certification, and appropriate training. Two (2) direct care staff annual training reviewed did not include dementia, hospice, postural support, and restricted health condition topics. The LPA and ED reviewed training regulations including topics and hours. The LPA advised the ED to ensure training hours are also disclosed on all training documents. INFECTION CONTROL/EMERGENCY DISASTER: The LPA reviewed the facility's Infection Control Plan and Emergency Disaster Plan. LPA noted that the facility is in compliance with regulation with both plans reviewed annually. The facility conducts emergency disaster drills as required, with the last drill documented on 11/29/2025. There were fire extinguishers throughout the facility, which were serviced on 01/30/2025. Fire alarm system is tested annually with the last inspection on 11/24/2025 by AB&A Fire Protection. Pursuant to Title 22 CA Code of Regulations and/or the Health and Safety Code, the following deficiencies were cited (Refer to 809-D). Exit interview conducted. A copy of the appeal rights and report was reviewed and provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 21, 2026

The state marks this report as 6 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 5. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.

20251 state visit · 1 document
Jan 23, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analysts (LPA) Erica Mosley arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct a required annual visit at 09:45am. Upon arrival LPA was greeted by front door receptionist, explained the reason for the visit and to inform their Administrator. LPA met with Executive Director Adam Pena and Clarissa Townes Director of Health care services the reason for the visit was explained. The LPA toured the physical plant areas inside and outside to ensure there are no health and safety hazards and facility is in compliance with Title 22 Regulations. At approximately 10:37am LPA inspected nine (9) randomly selected bedrooms (RM 100, RM 108, RM 110, RM 202, RM 310, RM 317, RM 321, RM 425, RM 429) throughout the four (4) occupied floors. The resident bedrooms were properly furnished with a bed, nightstand, and sufficient lighting for each resident. The bedrooms had appropriate and adequate bedding and linens such as sheets, pillowcases, mattress pads, and blankets. Restrooms: The resident restrooms appeared clean, sanitary and in operating condition with grab bars and non-slip surfaces. The bathrooms were sufficiently stocked with supplies and paper towels; towels and washcloths are not shared in the private rooms. From 10:59 am – 12:02 pm the hot water was measured in all rooms and ranged between 110.0 – 120.4 degrees Fahrenheit all within the required range. At 11:23am, LPA activated a resident pendant, and observed staff respond in approx. 1 min by phone call to the resident’s room. It was noted that the policy is to call the resident rooms first to check if assistance is needed or if it was an accidental call. If the resident does not answer the call staff typically respond within 5 minutes. During the inspection LPA observed, evacuation chairs in each stairwell. (PAGE 1)(Report Continued on LIC 809C PAGE 2...) (PAGE 2)(Report Continued from LIC 809C PAGE 1...) LPA inspected the kitchen/food service area and observed that knives are kept inaccessible to residents in care. Kitchen appliances were observed to be in operable condition. The facility has a sufficient supply of two (2) day perishable and seven (7) day non-perishable food. LPA inspected the common areas throughout the facility inside and out. All areas have been appropriately furnished. The common areas were observed to be properly furnished and relatively clean at the time of the visit. LPA observed sanitizer readily available in areas with high touch surfaces. Dining room furniture was observed to be in good condition. The facility maintained a comfortable temperature. Smoke detector(s) and carbon monoxide detectors were operational at the time of the visit. Fire extinguishers were observed throughout the facility, fully charged and last serviced Jan, 31, 2024 and are scheduled for service on Jan. 30 2025. LPA observed all required postings throughout the facility. The Administrator provided the fire protection equipment performance report dated 07/18/2024 where all smoke alarms and carbon monoxide detectors were tested and functioned properly. The last emergency disaster drill took place on 12/23/2024 and conducted quarterly reflecting all shifts scheduled. On the basement level, LPA observed a movie theater, two (2) locker room areas for male and female employees along with a food storage pantry. Additional non-perishable foods were also observed in the food storage pantry. The parking garage was accessible from the basement but locked from the outside and monitored by security. LPA observed an adequate supply of emergency food and water stored in this area. LPA did not observe any obstructions or hazards during the visit. Resident Records and Personnel records were reviewed from approx. 11:51 am – 1:30 pm. LPA Mosley reviewed Resident Records at approx. 11:51 a.m. Ten (10) personnel files were reviewed for, but not limited to: personnel records, health assessments, criminal record clearances, first aid/CPR training, and the appropriate training. All files in order at the time of the visit. (PAGE 2)(Report Continued on LIC 809C PAGE 3...) (PAGE 3) (Report Continued from LIC 809C PAGE 2...) At approx. 12:38 pm Eight (8) resident files were reviewed for, but not limited to, the following: signed admission agreements, current medical assessments with TB results, LIC627(c) Consent for Treatment form, and current needs and services plan. All files in order at the time. Medications review began at approximately 1:50pm The medications are centrally stored in a med room on the fourth floor inaccessible to residents in care. Medication assistance is provided to eight (8) residents at this time. LPA conducted a medication review on six (6) randomly selected residents. Medications are labeled and checked for expiration dates. All medications including PRNs were labeled, stored, and locked inaccessible to residents in care. No errors observed during review. Infection Control / Emergency disaster planning: During today’s visit the LPA Mosley reviewed the facility’s infection control practices and the facilities emergency disaster plan. The facilities policies and procedures as it pertains to infection control are adequate. Daily vehicle Inspection report was reviewed for facility vehicles. All records were in order. LPA conducted seven (7) resident and seven (7) staff interviews from approx. 10:55am- 2:04 pm. Staff interviews revealed that staff are knowledgeable in resident rights, different forms of abuse and reporting procedures. Resident interviews revealed that no concerns were noted or voiced at the time of the visit. LPA obtained the following documents – Census, Staff schedule, Emergency Disaster plan and updated Limited Liability insurance. During today's inspection, the facility is in compliance with Title 22 regulations. No citations issued. Exit interview conducted. Copy of report provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 23, 2025
20243 state visits · 3 documents
Nov 21, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility staff are not ensuring that an appropriately skilled professional is assisting the resident with injections

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Zabel Chochian conducted a subsequent complaint visit regarding above allegation. Upon arrival LPA met with Administrator Adam Pena and Director of Health Services Clarissa Townes. Reason for visit was stated. Following is a summary of the allegations and investigation findings: Regarding allegation, “Facility staff are not ensuring that an appropriately skilled professional is assisting the resident with injections” – It was alleged that a caregiver is providing medication injection to resident #1. On 04/24/20224, Community Care Licensing Division (CCLD) received a complaint with the above allegation. Investigation was initiated on 05/01/2024, a physical plant tour was conducted, and allegation was discussed with administrator. Resident roster and private caregiver list was obtained. A subsequent visit was conducted on 07/17/2024 and 11/21/2024. Interviews were conducted with (10) residents, (3) staff and potential witnesses. Additional interviews were conducted by phone on 07/24/2024 and 07/25/2024. (Continue to LIC 9099c) Unsubstantiated According to the Director of Health Care Services Maria Rona Perez. Facility caregivers and private caregivers are not allowed to provide any type of injection to resident. Executive Director (ED) Adam Pena stated that the facility does have a nursing staff and only a skilled professional would provide injections. Facility staff and private caregivers interviewed reported that they do not provide any injection to residents. Resident #1 (R1) was interviewed and confirmed handling own medications and is not on the facility med-management program at this time. Ms. Perez also confirmed that R1 is not on facility’s med-management program at this time and is not receiving any injections. Centrally stored medication records reviewed did not show R1 on any injections. Ten out ten random residents interviewed did not report any issues or concerns with the facility. All ten residents interviewed stated that they administer their own medications. Ms. Perez stated that they arrange a meeting with the resident, and families, when there is significant change in the resident’s condition, and once every 6 months to determine level of care change including but not limited to med-management. Mr. Pena and Ms. Perez both denied the allegation and stated that they are not aware of any caregiver or private caregiver assisting resident with injections. Mr. Pena stated that they will remind all staff, private caregivers, residents, and families of the facility policy regarding medications specifically “injections” which are to be provided only by the skilled professional (facility nurse). Based on the above information gathered although the allegation may be valid, there is insufficient evidence to support the allegation or that a violation occurred; therefore, the allegation “Facility staff are not ensuring that an appropriately skilled professional is assisting the resident with injections” is deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED at this time.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 21, 2024 · control 29-AS-20240424152441
Aug 26, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility staff did not comply with reporting requirements.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Valeria Conway conducted unannounced subsequent complaint investigation for the above allegation. LPA met with Executive Director (ED), Adam Pena, and Director of Health Service, Maria Ronna Perez, and explained the reason for the visit. During the initial complaint visit conducted on 7/25/24, LPA conducted interviews with the Executive Director and Nurse Director at 11:15 a.m. and 11:30 a.m.,. Additionally, during the visit LPA obtained resident records and other pertinent documents relevant to the investigation. On 08/16/2024, between 9:00 A.M. and 11 A.M, LPA conducted interviews and gathered other relevant documentation. On 8/16 at 9:59 a.m, LPA also interviewed Resident #1 (R1) and R1’s Responsible Parties (RPs). Conitinues on LIC 9099-C Unsubstantiated Continued from LIC 9099 Allegation “Staff did not comply with reporting requirements:” The complaint alleged that the facility staff did not comply with reporting requirements as they failed to notify the residents responsible party when the resident was sent to the hospital/Emergency Room (ER). Interviews conducted and records reviewed reflected that facility staff follows their protocol for reporting requirements and notifies all parties including but not limited to residents RPs, Community Care Licensing (CCL), and Long-Term Care Ombudsman (LTCO). Moreover, interviews conducted with R1’s RPs reflected that two (2) out of the three (3) RPs are notified of anything related to R1 and it is the family’s responsibility to communicate between the RPs. LPA did not find any documentation specifying who the facility should notify or a specific order of who to contact in case of emergency. However, facility ED agreed to ensure all three (3) RPs are informed of any future incident related to R1. Based on interviews and record review, the Department does not have sufficient evidence to determine that the staff did not comply with reporting requirements. Therefore, the above allegation is deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED at this time. No deficiencies cited. Exit interview conducted. Copy of the report was issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 26, 2024 · control 29-AS-20240719154743
Feb 8, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Brian Balisi and Martha Arroyo arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct a required annual visit at 09:30am. Upon arrival LPAs met with Executive Director Adam Pena and explained the reason for the visit. The LPAs toured the physical plant areas inside and outside to ensure there are no health and safety hazards and facility is in compliance with Title 22 Regulations. The LPAs began the inspection in the kitchen/food service area. Knives are kept inaccessible to residents in care. Kitchen appliances were observed to be in operable condition. The facility has a sufficient supply of perishable and non-perishable food. LPAs inspected the common areas throughout the facility inside and out. All areas have been appropriately furnished. The common areas were observed to be properly furnished and relatively clean at the of the visit. LPA observed appropriate signage regarding infection control posted throughout the facility. LPA observed sanitizer readily available in areas with high touch surfaces. Dining room furniture was observed to be in good condition. The facility maintained a comfortable temperature. Smoke detector(s) and carbon monoxide detectors were operational at the time of the visit. Fire extinguishers were observed throughout the facility, fully charged and were last serviced Jan, 31, 2024. At approximately 10:07am LPAs inspected nine (9) randomly selected bedrooms throughout the four (4) occupied floors. The resident bedrooms were properly furnished with a bed, night stand, and sufficient lighting for each resident. The bedrooms had appropriate and adequate bedding and linens such as sheets, pillowcases, mattress pads, and blankets. LPAs observed all bathrooms in each resident bedroom were clean, properly supplied and had functional fixtures. continued from 809 At approx. 10:11am, LPAs observed the water temperature above 120 degrees Fahrenheit in four (4) resident bathrooms on the first floor. Maintenance staff lowered temperature during the inspection. At approx. 1pm, LPA observed the water temperature to still be above 120 degrees Fahrenheit. The hot water was measured in each bathroom within 105 - 120 degrees Fahrenheit from the second floor to the fourth floor. Resident bathrooms were clean and sanitary and in operating condition with grab bars and non-skid surfaces. The bathrooms were sufficiently stocked with supplies and paper towels. At 10:19am, LPAs activated a resident pendant, and observed staff respond in approx 5 mins. During the inspection LPAs observed, evacuation chairs in each stairwell. On the basement level, LPAs observed a movie theater, two (2) locker room areas for male and female employees along with a food storage pantry. LPAs observed a sufficient supply of PPE stored in the storage pantry. Additional non-perishable foods were also observed in the food storage pantry. The parking garage was accessible from the basement, but locked from the outside and monitored by security. LPAs observed an adequate supply of emergency water stored in this area. LPAs did not observed any obstructions and hazards during the visit. Records review began at 11:28 am, six (6) resident records were reviewed for, but not limited to: appraisals, medical records, admissions agreement, consent forms. At 1pm, six (6) Personnel records were reviewed for, but not limited to: personnel records, health assessments, criminal record clearances, first aid/CPR training, and the appropriate training. All files were observed to be in order at this time. Last emergency disaster drill was conducted in April of 2023. Executive Direcotr stated emergency disaster drill will be conducted before the end of the month. Medications review began at approximately 1:00pm The medications are centrally stored in a med room on the fourth floor inaccessible to residents in care. Medication assistance is provided to nine (9) residents at this time. Medications are properly documented on the centrally stored medications and destruction record. Infection control: Upon entry, the facility has a central entry point for symptom screening, temperature checks, and sanitation station. At this time, the staff will continue to keep up signs that promotes good hand hygiene and symptoms of a communicable disease. The facility has an adequate supply of Personal Protection Equipment (PPE) and the facility is able to obtain additional supplies as needed. Continued from 809-C The facility’s cleaning protocol is sufficient. If needed, the facility has the capacity to designate each resident bedroom as a single isolation rooms if the facility has a confirmed case of a communicable disease. The facility’s policies and procedures as it pertains to infection control are adequate at this time. Between 11am - 03:00pm the LPAs interviewed six (6) staff members and six (6) residents. LPAs obtained the following documents - Census, Staff schedule, Emergency Disaster plan and updated Limited Liability insurance. The following deficiencies were observed (See LIC 809-D.) and cited from the California Code of Regulations, Title 22 and California Health and Safety Code. Failure to correct the deficiencies may result in civil penalties. Exit interview conducted. A copy of the report and appeal rights were provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 8, 2024
What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedthere was not enough evidence to prove a violation occurred — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe evidence showed the allegation was false, could not have happened, or had no reasonable basisType A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗

An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents and the questions below stand in their place.

Life here

Rooms, meals, the rhythm of a day, faith and language, pets and house rules — as the home describes them. Tap any detail for its source and date; nothing here is graded.

The home has not described daily life anywhere we have reviewed yet — that is the case for most small homes, and it says nothing about the home. These questions fill in the picture; keep the ones that matter to you.

Before you call

Ask every home the same questions — the state’s record does not answer these. Keep the ones that matter and they travel with your saved homes.

  1. What is included in the monthly rate, and what costs extra?
  2. Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?
  3. Which rooms does the non-ambulatory approval cover, and what transfer support is provided?
  4. What could change whether someone can stay here?
  5. Can we see a bedroom and share a meal during a visit?

Other homes nearby

The nearest licensed homes in Los Angeles County, closest first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.

Explore Los Angeles County