Illustration — no photo of this home on file yet
The Grandview
Large community·Licensed for 215·Los Angeles, California
- Care approvals on fileWheelchair · Dementia · Hospice · BedriddenState licensing record · September 13, 2026
- Estimated starting rate$5,200 a monthCovelight estimate · likely $4,050–$6,650
- Home sizeLicensed for 215Large care community · a licensed care home (RCFE)
- Room at the last state visit153 of 215 beds occupiedJuly 15, 2026 · not a current opening
- Ways to payAsk the homeMedi-Cal ALW participation not on file
- Last state visitJuly 15, 2026CDSS inspection record
The Grandview is a large care community in Los Angeles — a licensed residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE), the licence category behind “assisted living” and “board and care.” It is licensed for 215 residents since 2017.
Built from CDSS public records · September 13, 2026. Every fact below names its source and date.
Quick answers and the state record
A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.
Quick answers about The Grandview
Is The Grandview licensed?
The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
How many residents is The Grandview licensed for?
215 residents — a large community, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
Has The Grandview been cited?
2 Type A and 2 Type B citations since 2017, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. Those records count 24 state visits over the same years.
Is The Grandview still open?
This license was on the CDSS roster as of September 28, 2026.
What does The Grandview cost?
$5,200 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $4,050–$6,650. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 24 communities with 50 or more beds within 8 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
Among 16 other homes of a similar licensed size in Los Angeles that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $3,000 to $6,148 a month, and the middle figure is $3,547 (n = 16 other homes publishing a starting rate).
Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.
A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.
The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.
A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.
Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
Does The Grandview take Medi-Cal?
On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: we have not yet confirmed that an entry on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver list is this home’s. Ask the home: “Do you take the Medi-Cal Assisted Living Waiver?” The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
Who holds the license?
The license is held by The Grandview LLC, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
Is there a hospital nearby?
PIH Health Good Samaritan Hospital is 0.8 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.
Can The Grandview keep a resident on hospice?
Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 2 residents, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
The Grandview license and inspection record
- Name on the license: “GRANDVIEW, THE”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
- License #197609105. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
- Licensed for 215 residents — a large community, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
- Licensed to The Grandview LLC, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
- First licensed in 2017, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
- 24 state inspection visits since 2017, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
- 2 Type A and 2 Type B citations on file since 2017, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. The same records count 24 state visits in that period.
- 16 complaints and 4 substantiated allegations on file since 2017, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
- The most recent state visit on file is July 15, 2026, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗
Can they support the care needed?
California licenses a home for specific kinds of care. The state’s record lists what this home is approved for; the home’s own answers fill in what changes as needs change.
- Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved · covers up to 215 residents
- Dementia / memory careApproved by the state
- Hospice careApproved · covers up to 2 residents
- BedriddenApproved · covers up to 16 residents
State licensing record · September 13, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.
Read the state’s own wording
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 215 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 16 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 2.
983 - RCFE / DEMENTIA
CDSS record, verbatim · September 13, 2026
As needs change
- Staying through hospice
Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 2 — care may continue at the end of life
Ask: “If hospice is needed, can care continue here until the end?”
State licensing record · September 13, 2026
- If memory loss develops
Dementia-care designation on file
Ask: “Can we read the dementia care disclosure and discuss how daily support works?”
State licensing record · September 13, 2026
3 more questions to ask the home
- Two-person transfers or a lift
Not on file
Ask: “If two people or a lift are needed to transfer, can the person stay?”
- Someone awake overnight
Not on file
Ask: “Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?”
- Medicines
Not on file
Ask: “Who manages the medicines, and what happens when a dose is missed?”
Care & day-to-day support
These are the home’s own statements about its day-to-day practice — they are not part of the state licensing record, and the state has not approved or reviewed them.
Medication management
Reported on assistedliving.com · seen September 9, 2026.
Diabetes care
Reported on assistedliving.com · seen September 9, 2026.
Incontinence care
Reported on assistedliving.com · seen September 9, 2026.
What it costs here
Covelight estimate
$5,200a month to start
Likely $4,050–$6,650
From 24 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file
Likely monthly total
$5,200a month
Likely $4,050–$6,800
With a studio and basic help.
An estimate for planning, not a quote. The price is made in the phone call.
See the full cost breakdownRoom, care and fees · how people pay · how this estimate works
Starting monthly rate$5,200likely $4,050–$6,650
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 24 communities with 50 or more beds within 8 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600
Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (45 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).
One-time move-in fee$2,000one time · likely $0–$4,000
Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,000 (134 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.
- Likely monthly totalLikely $4,050–$6,800
- $5,200
- First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $4,850–$9,750
- $7,200
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
- Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
- Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverWe have not yet confirmed that an entry on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver list is this home’s. Ask the home: “Do you take the Medi-Cal Assisted Living Waiver?” The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
- SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
- VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
- Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
- MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
- The care level
Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.
- What is billed separately
Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.
- Move-in costs
A one-time community fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.
- Increases
California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.
- What is the full monthly cost for the room and care we need, and what does it include?
- What would the next care level cost, and who decides when it changes?
- What is billed separately, and is there a one-time fee or deposit at move-in?
- Is any private-pay period required before another payment program can begin?
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 24 communities with 50 or more beds within 8 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
24 homes like this within 8 miles publish starting rates mostly between $2,650–$6,400.
- Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
- Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
- Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
- Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
- We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
- It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Show the 24 nearby homes behind this estimate
- Garden Silver TownLos Angeles · 0.7 mi · Large community$2,900Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
- Commonwealth Royale Guest HomeLos Angeles · 1.0 mi · Large community$2,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living studio · seen September 9, 2026
- Kingsley ManorLos Angeles · 2.6 mi · Large community$3,594Listed on AssistedLiving.com · seen September 9, 2026
- Sakura Gardens at Los AngelesLos Angeles · 3.4 mi · Large community$3,420Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Hollenbeck PalmsLos Angeles · 3.5 mi · Large community$6,357Listed on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026
- City View LaLos Angeles · 4.1 mi · Large community$6,000Listed on AssistedLiving.com · seen September 9, 2026
- Belmont Village HollywoodLos Angeles · 4.8 mi · Large community$4,900Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Leisure Vale Assisted LivingGlendale · 5.0 mi · Large community$3,800Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Hayworth TerraceLos Angeles · 5.1 mi · Large community$3,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living studio · seen September 9, 2026
- Glen Park at Glendale - Boynton StGlendale · 5.1 mi · Large community$5,286Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Glen Park at Glendale - Mariposa StGlendale · 5.2 mi · Large community$5,286Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Leonard on Beverly A Clearwater CommuniLos Angeles · 5.2 mi · Large community$8,240Listed on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026
- Sage Glendale Senior LivingGlendale · 5.7 mi · Large community$6,500Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Ararat GardensGlendale · 5.7 mi · Large community$4,130Listed on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026
- Sunny Hills Assisted Living (Memory Care)Los Angeles · 6.1 mi · Large community$2,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
- The Pinnacles at BurtonLos Angeles · 6.2 mi · Large community$4,500Listed on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026
- Oakmont of Beverly HillsBeverly Hills · 6.2 mi · Large community$8,795Listed on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026
- Westmont of Culver CityCulver City · 6.8 mi · Large community$5,995Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Glen Terra Assisted LivingGlendale · 7.0 mi · Large community$3,800Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Sunrise of Beverly HillsBeverly Hills · 7.0 mi · Large community$10,822Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Ivy Park at BurbankBurbank · 7.5 mi · Large community$5,395Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Evergreen RetirementBurbank · 7.6 mi · Large community$2,500Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Nazareth HouseLos Angeles · 7.7 mi · Large community$3,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living studio · seen September 9, 2026
- Prospect ManorSouth Pasadena · 7.8 mi · Large community$2,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living · seen September 9, 2026
Where it is
- 2211 W 6Th Street, Los Angeles, CA 90057Address from the public record · September 13, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.
Opening the neighborhood map…
The state record
California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. Here are the dated documents and the state’s own words, beside what is typical for homes this size.
Since 2021, the state has filed 22 documents for this home, and its records count 24 visits since 2017. The most recent — a complaint investigation report on July 15, 2026 — closed with the state’s outcome word: “Unsubstantiated.”
- On file since
- 2021
- State visits
- 24
- Most recent visit
- July 15, 2026
- Occupied at that visit
- 153 of 215 bedsa count on that day, not an opening
We hold 16 complaint reports the state published for this home, dated July 18, 2021 to July 15, 2026. 16 of the 16 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (4), “Unsubstantiated” (12). 16 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word. Summary composed by computer from the 16 complaint reports below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.
Beside homes the same size
- Type A citations2typical 0
- Type B citations2typical 1
- Substantiated allegations4typical 2
- Total complaints16typical 6
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,354 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this licence since 2017.
Year by year
The last 36 months — 8 of 22 documents
Jul 15, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Resident fell sustaining multiple bruises due to staff neglect.
On 7/15/2026 at approximately 9:30 AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Angelica Segovia conducted an unannounced initial complaint visit to the facility. LPA was greeted by the Administrator, Yeni Flores and stated the reason for their visit. To investigate the allegation(s), at approximately 10:00 AM, LPA conducted a physical plant tour. By 10:30 AM, LPA requested relevant documentation such as but not limited to: Unusual Incident/Injury Report (SIR), Physician’s Report, Needs/Services, and Pre-Appraisal. From 10:30 AM to 12:30 PM, LPA attempted to interview one (1) resident (R1), seven (7) staff members (S1-S7), and conducted record review. (Continue to LIC 9099-C) Unsubstantiated Regarding the allegation: Resident fell sustaining multiple bruises due to staff neglect. It was alleged R1 fell resulting in bruising due to staff neglect. To investigate the allegation, LPA attempted interviews with one (1) resident and seven (7) staff members. LPA attempted to interview R1, but they were not present during LPA’s visit. S1 informed LPA, R1 has not returned from the hospital due to them seeking a new placement. LPA’s interview with six (6) of the seven (7) staff members revealed they did not witness nor were they made aware R1 to have fallen on 6/27/2026. Further interview with all seven (7) staff members confirmed if a resident were to fall, they are to be assisted if able and the fall is to be reported. LPA’s interview with S1 revealed that R1 had not disclosed to them that they had fallen. Per S1, they were made aware of R1’s bruising by R1’s family member on 7/02/2026. S1 stated once they became aware of R1’s alleged fall and bruising they sent them to the hospital that same day on 7/02/2026. Additionally, S1 took photos of R1’s injuries which LPA was shown and verified. During LPA’s record review, LPA observed the facility had self-reported the alleged incident on 7/03/2026 to their assigned LPA at Community Care Licensing Division (CCLD). Further record review of R1’s Physician’s Report revealed R1 was independent in their Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) such as: Bathing, grooming, feeding, and toileting needs. R1’s Physician’s Report revealed R1 to have various diagnosis. LPA’s web search of said diagnosis revealed the following: “patients frequently experience bruising, including under their arms. This is commonly caused by the use of blood thinners (like heparin) during treatments, skin fragility, and the natural blood-clotting issues associated with kidney disease”. LPA’s record review of R1’s Medication Sheet confirmed R1 to be on blood thinner medication. During LPA’s physical plant tour, LPA observed the dining area to have two (2) surveillance cameras. However, when LPA attempted to review the footage of 6/27/2026, the video surveillance did not have said footage available. Per S1, the facilities cameras are not set up to store footage past a certain allocated timeframe. LPA’s tour of R1’s bedroom revealed the room to be free of tripping hazards in the walkways and bathroom. During LPA’s physical plant tour, LPA observed a variety of staff to be present and assisting residents. LPA observed both floors of residents’ living quarters to be clean and free from tripping hazards. Based on interviews, record review, and observations there is not enough information to verify the allegation. Therefore, the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED at this time. No immediate health and safety issues observed during the day of the visit. Exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report was provided to the Administrator.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 15, 2026 · control 31-AS-20260707081644
Apr 21, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff do not follow proper eviction procedures.
On 4/21/26, Licensing Program Analyst, (LPA) Raymond Comer, arrived to conduct a subsequent facility visit regarding the above allegation. LPA conducted the initial complaint visit on 11/04/25, at which time LPA spoke with the facility Administrator. Between 12:30 pm to 1:15 pm, LPA recieved and reviewed facility roster, staff roster, and Resident#1's (R1’s) facility records, included but not limited to, physician report, needs and service plan, and other doculments relevant to the investigation. Between 1:35 pm and 2:15 pm, LPA interviewed R1. Allegation: Staff do not follow proper eviction procedures. It was alleged that R1 cannot return to the facility due to their substance use disorder. No notice of the eviction was issued to R1, due to R1 being in the medical facility. During today's subsequent visit, At 1:35 pm, LPA again spoke with Administrator and R1. During initial licensing visit, and at the time of this subsequent visit, R1 was still present in the facility. [LIC 9099C] Continued- Unsubstantiated LPA Interviews with Administrator and R1 revealed that the staff spoke with R1 about house rules informing them that continued noncompliance with facility house rules may lead to eviction. The Administrator revealed that they are continuing to work with R1 and assisting them to prevent possible eviction. Per Administrator, R1 has been compliant while living in the community. R1 verified the information received from the Administrator. Based on interviews and record review, there is not sufficient information to support the allegation. Hence, the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED at this time. No health and safety hazard were observed at the time of this visit. Exit interview was conducted, and a copy of report was issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 21, 2026 · control 31-AS-20251029115400
Feb 19, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff did not prevent residents from engaging in a verbal altercation. Staff did not prevent a resident from hitting another resident with an object resulting in injury.
On Thursday, 2/19/26, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Raymond Comer, conducted an unannounced initial complaint visit to the facility. LPA met the Administrator, presented official CDSS badge identification, and reason for the visit was disclosed. At 9:45 am, LPA conducted a physical plant tour; no health and safety issues were observed. To investigate the allegation, LPA received facility resident roster, staff roster. Between 10:00 am, and 10:30 am, LPA observed surveillance camera recordings of the outdoor courtyard commons area. Between 10:45 am, and 12:50 pm, LPA conducted interviews with the Administrator, Residents, and Staff. Between 1:00 pm, and 1:30 pm, LPA reviewed files relevant to the investigation. Prior to this visit, LPA reviewed Licensing records, including incident reports submitted by the facility. LIC 9099C] Continued- Unsubstantiated Allegation: Staff did not prevent residents from engaging in a verbal altercation. Allegation: Staff did not prevent a resident from hitting another resident with an object, resulting in injury. LPA conducted an interview with the RP, which revealed the following: Per the RP, R1 reported to their Primary Care Physician (PCP) that R2 slapped R1 in the face, attempted to grab R1's clothing in the torso area, and pulled R1's hair. Although the allegation states that "lack of supervision" resulted in R1 being assaulted by R2, the RP states that R1 did not report any supervision issues to either the RP, nor R1's PCP. LPA conducted interviews with the Administrator, and Staff, which revealed the following: The incident occurred on the morning of 7/10/25, around 9:00 am. Both administrator and staff state that an argument was heard between R1 and R2 coming from their shared bedroom. The Administrator denies that "lack of supervision" was a factor in the incident. This incident was the first time that interactions between R1 and R2 resulted in any physically aggressive action. R1 has a history of confusion, but has never acted in an aggressive manner. Per Administrator, and Staff, R2 prefers to stay in their room most of the day reading and watching television. R2 does not socialize amongst the community, is easily provoked to react with verbal insults, but has no history of being aggressive towards either residents or staff. Per the Administrator, and Staff, R1 and R2 were heard arguing, prior to any physical altercation, and staff immediately attempted to de-escalate the situation. It was at this time that R2 suddenly reacted, slapping R1. According to both the Administrator, and Staff, neither residents sustained any injuries during the conflict. Per Admin, R1 has been moved to a different bedroom and assigned a new resident roommate. LPA conducted interviews with ten residents. Nine (9) out of ten (10) residents could not confirm the allegation that lack of supervision resulted in physical assault committed between residents. Although there was an altercation between R1 and R2, leading to R2 striking R1, there is not corroborating evidence to support the allegation, as staff were present to intervene and redirect both residents. Moreover, licensee did submit an Incident Report (IR) to the Licensing agency regarding the incident. Therefore, based on the information obtained, the allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 19, 2026 · control 31-AS-20260211143028
Jan 15, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff neglect resulted in a resident sustaining a pressure injury. Staff did not seek timely medical attention for a resident.
On Thursday, 1/15/26, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Raymond Comer, conducted an announced complaint visit to the facility. LPA met the Administrator and discussed the purpose of this visit. During investigation at 2:00pm, LPA conducted physical plant tour. LPA spoke with the Administrator and two (2) staff. Due to nature of allegations, from 2:15pm to 2:45pm, LPA Comer spoke with ten (10) out of hundred fifty eight (158) facility residents including R1. During interview, LPA observed and assessed R1 and did not notice any wound on their arms. Prior to this visit LPA reviewed Licensing records including incident reports submitted by the facility. Allegation: Staff neglect resulted in a resident sustaining a pressure injury. Allegation: Staff did not seek timely medical attention for a resident. [LIC9099C]-continued Unsubstantiated It was reported that on 01/11/26, Resident #1 (R1) was at urgent care for post fall evaluation and observed with an open wound on their arm. R1 did not receive timely medical treatment for the wound and was unable to recall how long they had a wound. Staff revealed that on 01/11/26, R1 had an un-witnessed fall and complained of pain in their left arm. Staff #1 (S1) assessed R1’s for pain and no wounds were noted on R1’s arms. Due to pain, staff called an ambulance and R1 was transported to the hospital for evaluation. Staff also revealed that they received a call from the hospital informing that R1 observed having a big cut on their arm and staff explained to the caller that they did not observe a cut on R1’s arm. Upon R1’s return, staff checked R1’s arm and noticed a small cut that could have resulted from the drawing of blood. LPA interviews with residents revealed the following: R1 and other residents did not address any concerns about their care and medical attention provided by the facility staff. A review of R1’s facility records revealed that R1 is independent resident and does not require care and supervision to retain activities of daily living. A review of incident report dated 01/11/26 involving R1 verified the information revealed by staff. Overall investigation did not reveal any pertinent information to verify the allegations. Therefore, based on interviews, observation and record review, the above noted allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED at this time. No health and safety issues were noted during this visit. Exit interview was conducted and a copy of report was issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 15, 2026 · control 31-AS-20260113095023
Sep 5, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Annual Continuation
On Friday, 9/05/25, Licensing Program Analyst, (LPA) Raymond Comer, arrived to continue the required annual Inspection initiated on 08/28/2025. LPA met with Administrator, Yeni Flores, and the purpose of visit was disclosed. The following remaining domains were observed, reviewed and inspected: Bedrooms: LPA observed accommodations in resident bedrooms and bathrooms for safety, privacy, and comfort. Six (6) resident rooms (#106, #114, #146, #229, #235, #250) were inspected and observed to maintain required furnishings, sufficient lighting, bed linens, and blankets. All bedrooms were observed to be clean and clear from obstruction. Bathrooms were observed to be clean and sanitary, with necessary supplies and required safety fixtures (grab bars, anti-slip floor stripping). Hot water temperature measured between 108°F and 110°F; within the required range. Medications: Medication room is located on first floor. LPA observed room as locked and inaccessible to residents. Inside the room, medications are properly labeled and stored in secured cabinets. Resident medication documentation and distribution records appear to be accurate and complete. Commons: Activity room, and dining room observed as clean and clear of obstruction. Furnishings observed to be in good condition. No tripping hazards observed. [Continued on LIC 809-C] Outdoor: Courtyard area observed to have a shaded area, with sufficient seating for the residents. Outdoor furniture observed to be in good condition. All trash cans were observed to be covered. There are no bodies of water in the facility. There were no immediate health and safety hazards observed at the time of this inspection. Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report was given to facility Administrator.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 5, 2025
Aug 28, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
On 8/28/25, 10:15 am, Licensing Program Analyst, (LPA) Raymond Comer conducted an unannounced annual visit to this facility. LPA met with the Administrator and reason for the visit was disclosed. Facility is licensed as a multi-story residence. Fire clearance for two hundred and fifteen, (215) non-ambulatory residents; sixteen (16) of which may be bedridden. Hospice Waiver approved for two (2) residents. At 10:25 am, LPA conducted the tour of the physical plant with the Administrator and observed the following: Physical plant was inspected for cleanliness and condition. Facility’s main door is the primary entry/exit access. Screening area is located immediately upon entrance. Visitor Sign-in sheet, hand sanitizer, gloves and masks are available. Room temperature is comfortable; wall thermostat displays a setting of 74.0°F., within the required range. An approved Mitigation and Infection Control plan is on file. Hand washing, coughing etiquette, and other necessary signage are prominently displayed throughout the facility. Required postings observed to be current. Disaster drills were last conducted on 05/2025. Fire Detection/Protection system is present in the facility. Smoke and carbon monoxide detectors are hardwired, interconnected. System was tested and passed inspection certified by Los Angeles Fire Department on 03/05/2025. Fire Extinguishers are located throughout the facility and were serviced on May 17, 2025. (LIC 809-C continued) Kitchen: LPA observed kitchen to be clean, maintaining an adequate supply of perishable and non-perishable food located in the fridge, freezer, and pantry. Food was properly labeled and stored. The emergency food is stored and observed to locked in a room labeled "Emergency Plan" across from the elevator and sprinkler valve room. Trash cans observed with lids. Sharps are stored in the kitchen and inaccessible to residents. Laundry: LPA observed two (2) laundry rooms, located on the sub-base level floor, to be clean and clear from obstruction. Residents are allowed to do their own laundry if they choose, and industrial laundry machines were observed to be locked and used by staff only. All laundry soap is locked in storage and is given by staff from the locked storage room if needed. Resident records: Facility records room was observed as locked and inaccessible to residents. A total of nine (9) resident files were reviewed for current IPP and/or Needs and Services plans, physician report, and admission agreements. Resident records appeared to be complete and current. Staff records: Facility records room was observed as locked and inaccessible to residents. A total of eight (8) Staff files were reviewed. Criminal record clearances were present, and Staff are associated to this facility. Staff records appear to be complete and current. There were no health and safety hazards observed at the time of this inspection. Due to time constraints, LPA was unable to complete this required annual inspection visit. LPA will complete at a later date. Exit interview conducted/Copy of report given to Administrator.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 28, 2025
Nov 23, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
On 11/23/24, 09:15 am, Licensing Program Analysts, (LPAs') Raymond Comer, and Jose Gary Tan, conducted an unannounced annual visit to this facility. LPA met with Office Manager Jaime Trejo, who coordinated communications with Facility Administrator, Yeni Flores. LPA's spoke with the Administrator, via cellphone. Reason for the visit was disclosed and Administrator designated Mr. Trejo to sign the report Facility is licensed as a multi-story residence; the facility is fire cleared for two hundred and fifteen, (215) non-ambulatory residents; sixteen (16) of which may be bedridden. At 09:35 am, LPAs conducted the tour of the physical plant with Mr. Trejo, and observed the following: Physical plant was inspected for cleanliness and condition. Facility’s main door is the primary entry/exit access. Screening area is located immediately upon entrance. Visitor Sign-in sheet, hand sanitizer, gloves and masks are available. Covid 19 prevention protocols are posted. Room temperature is comfortable; wall thermostat displays a setting of 73.0°F., within the required range. An approved Mitigation and Infection Control plan is on file. Hand washing, coughing etiquette, and other necessary signage are prominently displayed throughout the facility. Required postings observed to be current. Disaster drills were last conducted on 11/02/2024. Fire Detection/Protection system is present in the facility. Smoke and carbon monoxide detectors are hardwired, interconnected and observed to be tested as "passed" inspection by Los Angeles Fire Department on 02/26/2024. Fire Extinguishers are located throughout the facility; all serviced May 15, 2024. (LIC 809-C continued) Kitchen: At 10:10 am, kitchen was observed to be clean and an adequate supply of perishables and non-perishable food located in the fridge, freezer, and pantry. Food was properly labeled and stored. The emergency food is stored and observed to locked in a room labeled "Emergency Plan" across from the elevator and sprinkler valve room. Trash cans observed with lids. Sharps are stored in the kitchen inaccessible to residents. Medication: At 10:35 am, LPAs' observed medications room to be secured and inaccessible to residents. Medications are stored in clear bins, refrigerator, and medication carts. Medication is prepared for residents and then placed in medication carts observed to be locked until distribution in the front office inaccessible to residents. Laundry: At 11:50 am, LPAs observed two (02) laundry rooms, located on the sub-base level floor, to be clean and clear from obstruction. Residents are allowed to do their own laundry if they choose, and industrial laundry machines were observed to be locked and used by staff only. All laundry soap is locked in storage and is given by staff from the locked storage room if needed. Commons: At 12:10 pm, LPAs observed community room, and activities room, to have sufficient tables and chairs for seating. Outside and surrounding area of the facility observed to be clean and clear from debris and obstruction. Bedrooms At 10:53am LPAs observed random rooms with bathrooms located inside on the first and second floor to be appropriately furnished with sufficient lighting, bed linen and comforters on all beds. Bedrooms contain single and double occupancy. All bedrooms observed to be clean and clear from obstruction. Bathrooms were observed to be clean and sanitary with necessary supplies and required safety fixtures (grab bars, anti-slip floor stripping). Hot water temperatures were measured randomly in multiple room;average temp range 107.8 - 114.0°F.; Within the required range. Hand towels are not shared. [LIC 809C] Continued-- Resident records: Facility records room was observed as locked and inaccessible to residents. A total of eights (8) resident files were reviewed for current IPP and/or Needs and Services plans, physician report, and admission agreements. Resident records appeared to be complete and current. Staff records: Facility records room was observed as locked and inaccessible to residents. A total of seven (7) Staff files were reviewed. Criminal record clearances were present, and Staff are associated to this facility. Staff records appear to be complete and current. There were no immediate health and safety hazards observed at the time of this inspection. Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report was given to the Administrator.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 23, 2024
The state marks this report as 7 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 3. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.
Oct 25, 2023Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff pushed resident
Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Evelin Rios and Michael Cava conducted a complaint visit to the facility to investigate the above allegation. LPAs met with the administrator, Yeni Flores, and advised her of the complaint. Today's investigation consisted of interviews with the administrator and staff, record review, and a physical plant inspection. Staff pushed resident: In regards to the allegation, it was alleged that on or around 09/13/23, Staff 1 (S1) pushed Resident 1 (R1). R1 had to use a wall for support and then lunged at S1. Interviews with the administrator and staff reveal that in the late night on or around 09/13/23, R1 was becoming agitated, and knocking on the doors of the other residents. S1 tried to intervene and stop R1 from doing so, but during the course of their intervention, R1 was becoming aggressive towards S1 prompting S1 to move R1 aside. In addition, S1 stated they never put their hands on R1. Review of facility surviellance reveal that S1's arm was raised, and forearm made Substantiated contact with R1s body, causing R1 to lose balance and lean back against the wall. Additional interviews were held, and there was no reports of any injuries sustained to R1. Review of facility files reveal that S1 received training in Intervention on Aggression, Positive Resident Communication, and Harassment. Although S1 received training with intervention on resident aggression, surveillance video confirms that that S1 made physical contact with R1, causing R1 to lose their balance. Therefore, the allegation is Substantiated. Citation issued on the 9099D. Administrator advised and appeal rights given.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 25, 2023 · control 31-AS-20231019092238
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87468.1(a)(1) · Plan of correction due date: Oct 25, 2023
Personal Rights of Residents in All Facilities: Residents in all residential care facilities for the elderly shall have all of the following: To be accorded dignity in their personal relationships with staff, residents and other persons. This requirement was not met as evidenced by: LPAs received surviellance of an incident that occurred on or around 09/13/23, which reveals S1 pushing or making contact with R1, causing R1 to lose balance. This poses an immediate health and safety risk of the resident.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 25, 2023
Plan of correction: As POC, administrator will hold training to address this section of the regulation. As proof training is held, documentation with training log is due to the licensing agency by November 1, 2023.
What the state’s words mean
CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗
Life here
Rooms, meals, the rhythm of a day, faith and language, pets and house rules — as the home describes them. Tap any detail for its source and date; nothing here is graded.
Find a detail about life at this home.
Rooms & the spaces they will use
Room types1 Bedroom · Semi-Private
Reported on assistedliving.com · seen September 9, 2026.
Common areasMeeting Room · Indoor Common Areas · Main Street Shops
Reported on assistedliving.com · seen September 9, 2026.
Roll-in / accessible shower
Reported on assistedliving.com · seen September 9, 2026.
LaundryDone by staff
Reported on assistedliving.com · seen September 9, 2026.
Cable or satellite TV
Reported on assistedliving.com · seen September 9, 2026.
Visitor parking
Reported on assistedliving.com · seen September 9, 2026.
Bath tubs
Reported on assistedliving.com · seen September 9, 2026.
AmenitiesCovered Parking · Arts and Crafts Center · Game Room · Movie or Theater Room
Reported on assistedliving.com · seen September 9, 2026.
Housekeeping
Reported on assistedliving.com · seen September 9, 2026.
Meals, preferences & familiar food
Meals served in the room
Reported on assistedliving.com · seen September 9, 2026.
Vegetarian or vegan optionsVegan · Vegetarian
Reported on assistedliving.com · seen September 9, 2026.
Meals provided
Reported on assistedliving.com · seen September 9, 2026.
Activities & the rhythm of a day
Activity types offeredActivities On-site · Birthday Parties · Live Dance or Theater Performances · Live Well Programs · Trivia Games · Live Musical Performances · and 2 more
Activities On-site · Birthday Parties · Live Dance or Theater Performances · Live Well Programs · Trivia Games · Live Musical Performances · BBQs or Picnics · Holiday Parties — reported on assistedliving.com · seen September 9, 2026.
Religious services at the home
Reported on assistedliving.com · seen September 9, 2026.
Religious services off site
Reported on assistedliving.com · seen September 9, 2026.
Pets, routines & independence
Pet types allowedDogs · Cats
Reported on assistedliving.com · seen September 9, 2026.
Visiting & staying involved
Public transit access claimed
Reported on assistedliving.com · seen September 9, 2026.
Before you call
Ask every home the same questions — the state’s record does not answer these. Keep the ones that matter and they travel with your saved homes.
- What is included in the monthly rate, and what costs extra?
- Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?
- Which rooms does the non-ambulatory approval cover, and what transfer support is provided?
- What could change whether someone can stay here?
- Can we see a bedroom and share a meal during a visit?
Other homes nearby
The nearest licensed homes in Los Angeles County, closest first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.
Garden Silver Town
Los Angeles · Large community · 0.7 mi away
$2,900 a month to start · Listed by the home
Promise Assisted Living
Los Angeles · Mid-size home · 0.9 mi away
$5,000 a month to start · Covelight estimate
Commonwealth Royale Guest Home
Los Angeles · Large community · 1.0 mi away
$2,500 a month to start · Listed by the home
Elim Silvertown
Los Angeles · Large community · 1.1 mi away
$4,150 a month to start · Covelight estimate
Blessed Sacrament Sisters of Charity
Los Angeles · Small home · 1.5 mi away
$5,300 a month to start · Covelight estimate
Garden Crest
Los Angeles · Mid-size home · 1.7 mi away
$4,350 a month to start · Covelight estimate