Large community · Licensed for 99 · South Pasadena
Prospect Manor
800 Prospect Ave, South Pasadena, CA 91030Licensed since 2003
Overview
No openings reported
- Approved by the state: Wheelchair · Hospice · BedriddenState licensing record · October 26, 2026
- Ways to pay: Medi-Cal ALW acceptedDHCS participant list · October 1, 2026
- Licensed for 99: a large care communityThe state license record
Ask this home
Free for families. A home gets your number only if you say yes.
Care and support
- Wheelchairup to 35 residents
- Hospiceup to 4 residents
- Bedridden
Not on file: dementia approval.
Approved by the state · State licensing record · October 26, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.
Read the state’s own wording
AGE RANGE 60 & OVER. APPROVED FOR 99 AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 35 MAY BE NON-AMBULATORY. APPROVED HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 4. BEDRIDDEN CLEARED RMS: 102,104,105,106,107,109,110,115,116,117,118,119,123.
985 - RCFE / HOSPICE
CDSS record, verbatim · October 26, 2026
Care services
These are the home’s own statements about its day-to-day practice — they are not part of the state licensing record, and the state has not approved or reviewed them.
Assisted living
Reported on prospect-manor.com · source dated October 4, 2026.
Help with bathing or showering
Reported on prospect-manor.com · source dated June 11, 2026.
Podiatrist visits
Reported on prospect-manor.com · source dated June 11, 2026.
Diabetes care
Reported on prospect-manor.com · source dated June 11, 2026.
Incontinence care
Reported on AssistedLiving.com · seen September 9, 2026.
Respite / short-term stays
Reported on prospect-manor.com · source dated June 11, 2026.
Help with dressing and grooming
Reported on prospect-manor.com · source dated June 11, 2026.
Works with residents’ own health care providers
Reported on prospect-manor.com · source dated June 11, 2026.
Who supplies incontinence briefsBilled separately
Reported on prospect-manor.com · source dated June 11, 2026.
Staff escort to meals, activities and the bathroom
Reported on prospect-manor.com · source dated June 11, 2026.
Activities of daily living the home lists help withBathing · Grooming · Dressing · Escorting
Reported on prospect-manor.com · source dated June 11, 2026.
24-hour supervision claimed
Reported on prospect-manor.com · source dated June 11, 2026.
As needs change
Staying through hospice
Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 4 — care may continue at the end of life
State licensing record · October 26, 2026
We’ll ask for you. Not on file for Prospect Manor: two-person transfers or a lift, who is awake overnight, help with medicines and care if memory loss develops. When we check availability, we ask about these too.
Check availabilityWhat it costs here
This home’s starting rate
$5,500a month to start
Listed by the home on its own website · October 5, 2026 · See the home’s page
Costs & moving in
What the base rate includesBathing · Laundry · Grooming · Escorting · Tray Service
Reported on prospect-manor.com · source dated June 11, 2026.
Monthly cost breakdownWith a studio and basic help · room, care and fees$5,500likely a month
Memory care is not priced here: a dementia-care designation is not on file for this home. Ask the home.
Starting monthly rate$5,500this home
The home lists this starting rate on its own website for assisted living, semi-private, seen October 5, 2026.
Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600
Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (44 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).
One-time move-in fee$2,500one time · likely $0–$4,000
Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,500 (133 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.
- Likely monthly totalLikely $5,500–$6,100
- $5,500
- First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $5,500–$9,650
- $8,000
How people payOn the Medi-Cal waiver list · private pay, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
- MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
- Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
- Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home appears on the DHCS participation list, October 1, 2026. Confirm eligibility and current participation with the program. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board. On the waiver, a resident on SSI/SSP pays the home $1,444.07 a month for room and board.
- SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
- VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
- Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
Rates at nearby homes12 nearby homes publish starting rates of $3,000 to $10,995
12 homes like this within 5 miles publish starting rates mostly between $3,300–$8,050.
- Morningstar of PasadenaPasadena · 1.0 mi · Large community$6,825Listed on its own website · assisted living starting rate · seen October 27, 2026
- Silverado Senior Living - The HuntingtonAlhambra · 1.6 mi · Large community$8,100Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Regency Park Oak KnollPasadena · 2.2 mi · Large community$5,950Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
- Del Mar ParkPasadena · 2.3 mi · Large community$3,250Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
- Savant of AlhambraAlhambra · 2.5 mi · Large community$5,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Villa GardensPasadena · 2.9 mi · Large community$10,995Listed on its own website · seen October 5, 2026
- Astoria Park Senior LivingPasadena · 3.1 mi · Large community$3,800Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Ivy Park at San MarinoSan Gabriel · 4.1 mi · Large community$3,995Listed on its own website · private studio & companion suites available floor plans · seen October 27, 2026
- Pasadena HighlandsPasadena · 4.3 mi · Large community$5,500Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- California Mission InnRosemead · 4.5 mi · Large community$3,000Listed on its own website · san gabriel suite · seen October 5, 2026
- Ararat GardensGlendale · 4.8 mi · Large community$4,130Listed on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026
- MontecedroAltadena · 4.8 mi · Large community$5,544Listed on its own website · starting rate with entrance fee contract · seen October 27, 2026
How this estimate worksWhere this price comes from
The home lists this starting rate on its own website for assisted living, semi-private, seen October 5, 2026.
- Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
- Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
- Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
- Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
- We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
- It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
- The care level
Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.
- What is billed separately
Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.
- Move-in costs
A one-time move-in fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.
- Increases
California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.
An estimate for planning, not a quote. A home sets the price after hearing about the care needed.
Daily life
Rooms, meals, activities and house rules, in the home’s own words. Open any detail to see where it came from.
Rooms & the spaces they will use (10)Private rooms · Outdoor space · Shared / companion rooms
Private rooms
Reported on prospect-manor.com · source dated June 11, 2026.
Outdoor spacePatio
Reported on prospect-manor.com · source dated June 11, 2026.
Shared / companion rooms
Reported on prospect-manor.com · source dated June 11, 2026.
Common areasLounge areas · Indoor Common Areas
Lounge areas — reported on prospect-manor.com · source dated June 11, 2026.
Indoor Common Areas — reported on AssistedLiving.com · seen September 9, 2026.
Private bathroom
Reported on prospect-manor.com · source dated June 11, 2026.
LaundryDone by staff
Reported on prospect-manor.com · source dated June 11, 2026.
Room typesPrivate · Semi Private · Semi-Private Rooms
Private · Semi Private — reported on prospect-manor.com · source dated June 11, 2026.
Semi-Private Rooms — reported on Caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.
Housekeeping frequencyDaily
Reported on prospect-manor.com · source dated June 11, 2026.
Rooms come furnished
Reported on prospect-manor.com · source dated June 11, 2026.
Housekeeping
Reported on prospect-manor.com · source dated June 11, 2026.
Meals, preferences & familiar food (6)Meals provided per day · Snacks available · Residents choose between options at each meal
Meals provided per day3
Reported on prospect-manor.com · source dated June 11, 2026.
Snacks available
Reported on prospect-manor.com · source dated June 11, 2026.
Residents choose between options at each meal
Reported on prospect-manor.com · source dated June 11, 2026.
Dishes the home names, on a published menu or in its own description of its foodHerbed Brown Rice with Diced Vegetables · Stuffed Filet with Creamy Sauce · Creamed Spinach · Caesar Salad · Deli Sandwich · Fruit Supreme · and 9 more
Herbed Brown Rice with Diced Vegetables · Stuffed Filet with Creamy Sauce · Creamed Spinach · Caesar Salad · Deli Sandwich · Fruit Supreme · Chicken Salad Deluxe Platter · Tomatoe Bisque Soup · Assorted Juices · Milk · Coffee · Teas · Old Fashioned Pancakes with Syrup · Scrambled Eggs · Hot & Cold Cereals — reported on prospect-manor.com · source dated June 11, 2026.
Meals provided
Reported on prospect-manor.com · source dated June 11, 2026.
Professional chef
Reported on prospect-manor.com · source dated June 11, 2026.
Activities & the rhythm of a day (2)Activity types offered · Religious services off site
Activity types offeredSocial program · Activities On-site
Social program — reported on prospect-manor.com · source dated June 11, 2026.
Activities On-site — reported on AssistedLiving.com · seen September 9, 2026.
Religious services off site
Reported on AssistedLiving.com · seen September 9, 2026.
Pets, routines & independence (1)Residents may bring a pet
Residents may bring a petReported no
Reported on Caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.
Visiting & staying involved (8)Transport to medical appointments · Tour scheduling link · Transit lines named
Transport to medical appointments
Reported on prospect-manor.com · source dated June 11, 2026.
- Open on the website
Tour scheduling link
Reported on prospect-manor.com · source dated June 11, 2026.
Transit lines namedGold Line
Reported on prospect-manor.com · source dated June 11, 2026.
Transport for shopping and errands
Reported on prospect-manor.com · source dated June 11, 2026.
- Open on the website
Contact form
Reported on prospect-manor.com · source dated June 11, 2026.
Transportation costs extraReported no
Reported on AssistedLiving.com · seen September 9, 2026.
Transport for group outings
Reported on prospect-manor.com · source dated June 11, 2026.
Transportation
Reported on prospect-manor.com · source dated June 11, 2026.
About the home (1)Brand or trade name
Brand or trade namePROSPECT MANOR
Reported on prospect-manor.com · source dated October 4, 2026.
Where it is
800 Prospect Ave, South Pasadena, CA 91030Address from the public record · October 26, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.
Opening the neighborhood map…
- Huntington HospitalHospital · General acute care, on the state’s list1.2 mi
Straight-line distances; check the drive or the walk. Hospital: the nearest general acute care hospital on the state’s list (CDPH, September 16, 2026).
Open directionsThe state record
California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.
CDSS public record, read October 26, 2026 · License #197603952 · See the state’s own record
The last 36 months — 14 of 26 documents
Complaint outcomes in these 36 months, in the state’s words: 5 “Substantiated” and 4 “Unsubstantiated”.
20262 state visits · 2 documents
Oct 5, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file
We haven’t transcribed this report yet. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Feb 23, 2026Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Alberto Lopez conducted an unannounced annual visit at the facility using the CARE inspection tool. LPA met with Lydia Pabion, Administrator and explained the reason for the visit. Facility is licensed to serve 99 adults over the age of 60 years old, of which 35 may be non-ambulatory. Facility has a hospice waiver for 4 and the following rooms are cleared for bedridden residents; 102 thru 110, 115 thru 119, and 123. LPA observed the following today: 1. Infection Control: The facility staff are using appropriate hand hygiene and wearing gloves while assisting the clients. Staff are cleaning and disinfecting each shift for high touched surface area. Facility has sufficient PPE supplies and but does have an Infection Control Plan. 2. Physical Plant and Environmental: Facility is a two-story building with a commercial kitchen, a dining room, an activity room, a courtyard, a medication room, a laundry room, front porch, and smoking area in the back. LPA inspected the carbon monoxide/smoke detectors in random rooms and are working probably. LPA tested the hot water temperature, and was tested between 105.4 –121.5 degrees F. which is not within the Title 22 regulation of 105.0 – 120.0 degrees F. All the cleaning supplies and chemicals are locked and inaccessible to residents. The facility has sufficient personal hygiene products for clients to use. All clients rooms are completely furnished with chairs and have required beddings. All the bathrooms are clean, sanitized, and operational. The exit and passageway are safe and free of obstruction. One soap dispenser is in need of repair, room 105 is missing slip mat, some window screens need repair, and one shelf in storage room needs replacement. Small trash can first floor restroom needs repair. (Continued on 809C) (continued from 809) 3. Operational Requirements: The facility maintains a fire clearance approved by the fire department. Facility Has hospice waiver for four (4) The facility has shaded area with table and chairs for residents to utilize for outdoor activity. The last fire/disaster drill was conducted on 02/03/2026. LPA reviewed and verified facility liability insurance which expires on 12/18/2026 4. Staffing: The facility has sufficient staff, and the night supervision staff did receive planned emergency training. 5. Personnel Record-Training: All the staff files are maintained in the facility. Staff employed are over the age of 18 and are fingerprint cleared and associated to the facility. The administrator Lydia Pabion certificate expires on 08/10/2027. All the direct care staff received Medication Management Training. The first aid training certificates for staff are current. 6. Resident Records-Incident Reports: Resident files are maintained at the facility and have the following documents in their files - Admission Agreements, Identification & Emergency Information, current Physician's Report, Pre-admission appraisal/Appraisal Needs & Services Plan. 7. Resident Rights-Information: The Complaint, ombudsman and Residents personal rights are posted by the main entry. Visiting hours were posted at facility. 8. Planned Activities: Facility has sufficient space to accommodate indoor and outdoor activities. There are sufficient supplies and equipment to meet resident's physical capability. 9. Food Service: The kitchen was inspected and has sufficient supply of 2-day perishable & 7-day non-perishable food. Kitchen, food preparation area, and storage areas were observed to be clean and sanitary. The food is properly stored in the refrigerator (clean, labeled and well maintained). Pesticides and cleaning supplies are kept away from the food preparation areas. Kitchen is kept clean and free from rodents. 10. Incidental Medical & Dental: The medications are centrally stored in original containers. During the visit today, LPA reviewed five (5) residents' medication files, and all medications are administered according to Doctor’s orders. (continue on 809C) (continued from 809C) 11. Disaster Preparedness: The facility has an Emergency Disaster and Mass Casualty Plan containing emergency evacuation, storage and preservation of medications, The facility conducts emergency drill on a quarterly basis for all staff and residents. Facility needs to update emergency disaster plan to include additional relocation location. 12. Residents with Special Health Needs: No residents have prohibited health conditions. Deficiencies observed during today’s visit. Technical Violations and advisory issued. An exit interview was held. A copy of this report, 809D technical violations, advisory, and appeal rights were provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 23, 2026
The state marks this report as 11 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 6. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.
20255 state visits · 5 documents
Dec 5, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff did not provided medical attention to resident as needed. Staff did not follow resident’s care plan
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Mary Flores conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint investigation visit regarding the above allegations. LPA met with Jose De Leon and explained the reason for the visit. The investigation consisted of the following: On 8/5/25 LPA Flores conducted an initial complaint investigation visit, interviewed administrator and nurse and collected the following documents for Resident #1’s (R1) file and requested copies of physician’s report, needs and care plan, identification and emergency sheet, admission agreement, hospital discharge documents, medication sheets, and home health plan. On 8/28/25 LPA Flores conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint visit and interviewed 5 residents and 5 staff. On 9/18/25 LPA Flores contacted Home Health Agency. On 11/24/25 LPA Flores contacted R1 over the phone. On 12/5/25 LPA Flores delivered findings. (CONTINUED ON LIC 9099C) Unsubstantiated The investigation revealed the following: Regarding allegation: Staff did not provide medical attention to resident as needed. It is alleged R1 was in pain and medical assistance was not obtained. Interviews with 6 out of 6 residents stated facility staff assist them with obtaining medical care when needed. Interview with staff revealed 5 out of 5 staff stated that staff provide assistance to residents as soon as they require it. Per administrator and facility’s nurse, on 7/24/25 facility’s nurse provided pain medication to R1 once R1 complained of pain. Per facility’s nurse, R1 often has pain due to health-related conditions. Therefore, the plan is to provide pain medication as prescribed by physician. As soon as R1 continue to complain of pain, facility staff send the resident out to the hospital. Documents reviewed revealed, Home Health Visit notes dated 8/6/25, note R1 is to be provided Norco for pain as needed. Per July 2025 medication sheet, on 7/24/25 R1 was provided morning dose of Hydroco/APAP for pain, no additional doses were provided as R1 went out to the hospital. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation(s) did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. Regarding allegation: Staff did not follow resident’s care plan. It is alleged R1 required catheter care and facility staff did not provided. Interviews with residents revealed 6 out of 6 residents stated facility follows care plan or assist with care as needed. Interviews with staff revealed 5 out of 5 staff stated they follow resident’s care plan, which is explained by the administrator to the caregivers. Documents reviewed revealed Home Health Notes dated 7/23/25, note R1 was provided care for foley catheter by home health nurse and will continue to provide care and consult with physician regarding care. July 2025 medication sheet, notes R1 was being provided with antibiotics from 7/21/25-7/24/25. Home Health After Visit Summary notes R1 was at the hospital between 7/24/25-7/28/25 changes to antibiotics were noted. Although R1 had a change in condition, facility staff were following R1’s home health agency plan of care and a nurse was providing care with catheter. Therefore, this allegation is unsubstantiated. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation(s) did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. Exit interview was conducted with Jose De Leon and a copy of this report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 5, 2025 · control 28-AS-20250728111411
Aug 30, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Facility staff did not notify authorized representative of incident.
*This report is a corrected version of report dated 8/5/25 to change finding and substantiated one of the allegations and add additional information.* Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Mary Flores conducted a subsequent complaint investigation visit regarding the above allegation. LPA met with Janice Somera and explained the reason for the visit. The investigation consisted of the following: LPA requested staff/resident rosters. On 5/27/25 LPA Flores interviewed the administrator, 3 staff, 5 residents, reviewed file for resident #1-#2(R1-R2) and requested copies of medical assessment, needs and care plan, admission agreement, information and emergency information sheet, power of attorney, and incident reports. On 7/22/25, 7/28/25, and 7/31/25 LPA attempted to contact South Pasadena Police officer. On 7/31/25 LPA interviewed 1 staff over the phone. On 8/5/25 LPA delivered findings. On 8/7/25 LPA interviewed South Pasadena Police Department officer. On 8/11/25 LPA Flores interviewed R1's responsible party. On 8/29/25 LPA received a copy of police report. (CONTINUED ON LIC 9099C) Substantiated The investigation revealed the following: Regarding allegation: Facility staff did not notify authorized representative of incident. It is alleged facility staff did not notified R1’s responsible party regarding incidents that occurred on 5/7/25 and 6/11/25. Interviews with residents revealed facility staff notify their responsible party when necessary. Interviews with staff revealed Administrator or LVN are responsible for notifying responsible parties when incidents take place. Per administrator, on 5/8/25 administrator contacted R1’s responsible party via telephone at least three times and was unable to leave a voice message. Interview with R1’s responsible party revealed upon visiting R1 at the facility on 5/8/25, administrator stated to them that they had attempted to notify them of the bruise but had not been able to reach them. Regarding the incident on 6/11/25 responsible party called around 3:15pm and was asked to call police officer for details regarding an incident. Incident report dated 5/8/25 notes administrator notified responsible party. Incident report dated: 6/11/25 does not note responsible party was notified. Per police report reviewed, South Pasadena Police officer responded to a battery assault at the facility at 12: 32pm. Facility staff failed to notify R1’s responsible party of the incident that took place on 6/11/25 and requested to call police officer for details of the incident. Therefore, the allegation is substantiated. Based on LPAs observations and interviews which were conducted record review(s), the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation(s) is found to be substantiated. California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6 and Chapter 8 are being cited on the attached LIC 9099D. Exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report, LIC 9099D, and appeal rights were provided. The investigation revealed the following: Regarding allegation: Facility staff did not provide adequate supervision resulting in a resident being attacked by another resident. It is alleged that on 5/7/25, R1 was attacked by roommate resulting in an injury. Interviews conducted with residents revealed 4 out of 5 residents stated not have observed R2 having aggressive behaviors, hearing an argument, loud noises, or being hurt by R2 at the facility. 1 out of 5 residents stated R2 hit resident with an open hand in the face seven times the evening of 5/7/25. Interviews with staff determined staff did not observe or hear loud noises that indicate the incident was happening. Staff stated that on 5/8/25 LVN noted the bruise around the eye when providing eye drops in the morning. Per staff, R2 has not shown aggressive behavior in the last six months, other than the one incident they observed in the dining room on 6/11/25. Documents reviewed revealed; incident report dated 5/8/25 notes R1 was observed with a bruise in the eye and R1 stated that it was due to R2 hitting R1. R1 was provided with first aid assistance, and R2 was transferred to a different room. Incident report dated: 6/11/25 notes R2 was walking behind R1 in the dining room and pulled R1’s hair causing R1 to fall. The administrator contacted South Pasadena Police Department and police report was created. R2’s physician’s report does not note aggressive behaviors. Incident report review does not show a history of aggressive behavior’s observed of R2 in the last 2 years. Review of police report and video, it was observed that R2 drags R1 to the floor causing R1 to hit the side of the head against the rail and two staff respond to assist R1. Although R1 had a bruise on 5/8/25 it is unsure if R2 caused the bruise, and the incident on 6/11/25 did occur. However, The facility took action once the first incident happened and moved R2 to a different room. During the second incident Administrator contacted South Pasadena Police Department and sought care for R1 and R2. Therefore, the allegations is unsubstantiated. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation(s) did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated. Exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 30, 2025 · control 28-AS-20250523163423
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87211(a)(2) · Plan of correction due date: Sep 5, 2025
87211 Reporting Requirements (a) Each licensee shall furnish to the ...g: (2) Occurrences, ...outbreaks, poisonings, catastrophes or major accidents which threaten the welfare, safety or health of residents... This requirement is not met as evidence by: Based on interviews and record review administrator failed to inform responsible party of incidents which poses a potential threat to the health, safety, or personal rights of the persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 30, 2025
Plan of correction: Administrator will certify in writing that will ensure responsible parties are notify of any incidents and will update phone numbers, obtain other means to contact responsible party and submit a copy of certification to the department by POC due date 9/5/25.
Aug 15, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Lack of staff supervision resulting in resident eloping from the facility.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Cynthia Chan conducted a complaint investigation regarding the allegation listed above. LPA arrived unannounced and met with the administrator, Lydia Pabion. The purpose of the visit was explained. LPA obtained a copy of the staff roster, resident roster, and documents on Resident #1 (R1). LPA interviewed the administrator, 3 Staff, and 5 Residents. R1 was not available for the interview today. The investigation revealed the following: Allegation - Lack of staff supervision resulting in resident eloping from the facility. It is alleged that Resident #1 (R1) was found by law enforcement and was in the hospital for dehydration. According to staff interviews, R1 was not in the facility around 7 pm on 8/5/25. Substantiated The facility staff searched the entire building and drove around the streets but could not find R1. Staff contacted the police to file a report the same day. The administrator noted that R1 was found by the police on 8/6/25 approximately 4pm and is temporarily in a rehabilitation facility. Based on information gathered, R1 had gone missing in the past while out with another resident. Staff had not observed any changes in R1 and stated that R1 usually does not leave the facility. Staff are aware that R1 cannot leave the facility unassisted and did not know why R1 left without informing anyone. LPA reviewed R1’s physician’s report, and it indicated that the resident is not able to leave the facility unassisted. Residents interviewed stated that the staff monitor who enters and leaves the premises. Four (4) residents who can leave the facility will sign out when or if they do, and one, who cannot leave the facility unassisted, only goes out in the community with a staff member. Based on interviews conducted and record review, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met; therefore, the above allegation is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. California Code of Regulations, (Title 22, Division 6 and Chapter 8), are being cited on the attached LIC 9099D. An exit interview was conducted. The Plan of Correction was reviewed and developed with the administrator. A copy of this report and appeal rights were provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 15, 2025 · control 28-AS-20250808152943
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87411(a) · Plan of correction due date: Aug 16, 2025
87411 Personnel Requirements - General (a) Facility personnel shall at all times be sufficient in numbers, and competent to provide the services necessary to meet resident needs. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews and record review, R1 who cannot leave the facility unassisted, eloped from the facility which posed an immediate health and safety risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 15, 2025
Plan of correction: The Licensee will provide a written plan explaining how the facility will ensure that residents who cannot leave the facility unassisted are supervised as required.
Aug 5, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Facility staff did not provide adequate supervision resulting in a resident being attacked by another resident. Facility staff did not notify authorized representative of incident.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Mary Flores conducted a subsequent complaint investigation visit regarding the above allegations. LPA met Lydia Pabion with and explained the reason for the visit. The investigation consisted of the following: LPA requested staff/resident rosters. On 5/27/25 LPA Flores interviewed the administrator, 3 staff, 5 residents, reviewed file for resident #1-#2(R1-R2) and requested copies of medical assessment, needs and care plan, admission agreement, information and emergency information sheet, power of attorney, and incident reports. On 7/22/25, 7/28/25, and 7/31/25 LPA attempted to contact South Pasadena Police officer. On 7/31/25 LPA interviewed 1 staff over the phone. On 8/5/25 LPA delivered findings. The investigation revealed the following: Regarding allegation: Facility staff did not provide adequate supervision resulting in a resident being attacked by another resident. It is alleged that on 5/7/25, R1 was attacked by roommate resulting in an injury. (CONTINUED ON LIC 9099C) Unsubstantiated Interviews conducted with residents revealed 4 out of 5 residents stated not have observed R2 having aggressive behaviors, hearing an argument, loud noises, or being hurt by R2 at the facility. 1 out of 5 residents stated R2 hit resident with an open hand in the face seven times the evening of 5/7/25. Interviews with staff determined staff did not observe or hear loud noises that indicate the incident was happening. Staff stated that on 5/8/25 LVN noted the bruise around the eye when providing eye drops in the morning. Per staff, R2 has not shown aggressive behaviors in the last six months, other than the one incident they observed in the dining room on 6/11/25. Documents reviewed revealed; incident report dated 5/8/25 notes R1 was observed with a bruise in the eye and R1 stated that it was due to R2 hitting R1. R1 was provided with first aid assistance, R1’s responsible party was notified, and R2 was transferred to a different room. Incident report dated: 6/11/25 notes R2 was walking behind R1 in the dining room and pulled R1’s hair causing R1 to fall. The administrator contacted South Pasadena Police Department and police report was created. R2’s physician’s report does not note aggressive behaviors. Although R1 had a bruise on 5/8/25 it is unsure if R2 caused the bruise, and the incident on 6/11/25 did happen. The facility took action once the first incident and moved R2 to a different room. During the second incident Administrator contacted South Pasadena Police Department and sought care for R1 and R2. Therefore, the allegations is unsubstantiated. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation(s) did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. Regarding allegation: Facility staff did not notify authorized representative of incident. It is alleged facility staff did not notified R1’s responsible party regarding incident that occurred on 5/7/25. Interviews with residents revealed facility staff notified their responsible party when necessary. Interviews with staff revealed Administrator or LVN notify responsible party when incidents take place. Per administrator, on 5/8/25 administrator contacted R1’s responsible party phone number at least three times and was unable to leave a voice message. Interview with R1’s responsible party revealed upon visit administrator had stated to them that they had attempted to notify them of the bruise but had not been able to reach them. Incident report dated 5/8/25 notes administrator notified responsible party. Although the administrator may not have reach R1’s responsible party. It was noted on incident report dated 5/8/25 that they contacted the responsible party. Therefore, this allegation is unsubstantiated. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation(s) did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. Exit interview was conducted with Lydia Pabion and a copy of this report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 5, 2025 · control 28-AS-20250523163423
Jan 21, 2025Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Mary Flores conducted an unannounced annual visit at the facility using the CARE inspection tool. LPA met with Lydia Pabion and explained the reason for the visit. Facility is licensed to served 99 adults over the age of 60 years old, of which 35 may be non-ambulatory. Facility has a hospice waiver for 4 and the following rooms are cleared for bedridden residents; 102 thru 110, 115 thru 119, and 123. Facility is a two story building with a commercial kitchen, a dining room, an activity room, a courtyard, a medication room, a laundry room, front porch, and smoking area in the back. LPA conducted a tour of the facility with Jose de Leon and observed the following: Building is in good repair inside and outside. Lobby area was observed poster for Local Ombudsman and personal rights were observed in this area. Activity area is clean, fireplace is inaccessible to residents. Dining room was observed in good repair and clean. Kitchen was observed clean, storage of food supplies was observed with sufficient perishables for at least 2 days, and non-perishables for 7 days. A list of special diets was observed posted in the kitchen. LPA observed 6 random resident rooms and observed sufficient lighting, furniture, and bedding supplies. Each room has a bathroom and were observed in working condition. Water temperature was tested between 111.9 - 126.8 degrees F. which is not within the required 105-120 degrees F. Grab bars were not observed in room #121. Skid mats/strips were not observed in rooms #216 and 224. Ramps, and stairways were observed clear of obstructions. Both stairways were observed with an evacuation chair. Courtyard provides shaded sitting area, front porch provides sitting area, and back area provides a smoking area. Carbon monoxide/Smoke detectors were observed throughout and the facility has a fire sprinkler system. Fire extinguishers in hallways in each floor and last checked on 1/2/24. Last fire drill was conducted on 9/22/24. Additional linens, and cleaning supplies were observed in a closet. Sharps and chemicals were observed inaccessible to the residents. No large bodies of water were observed. LPA reviewed medication for 5 residents and files for 6 residents, of which one was under hospice and hospice plan was observed. Six staff files were reviewed. (CONTINUED ON LIC 809C) Each staff have 20 hours of training on file. Administrator certificate was observed for Lydia Pabion #6006152740 exp. date: 8/10/25. Emergency disaster plan and infection control plan were reviewed and have been reviewed yearly. First Aid kit was observed. LPA interviewed 4 residents and 4 staff. Deficiencies have been noted on LIC 809D per Title 22 Regulations. Exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report, LIC 809D, and appeal rights were provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 21, 2025
The state marks this report as 5 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 4. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.
20246 state visits · 7 documents
Oct 29, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Facility staff did not provide adequate supervision resulting in a resident eloping from the facility.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Mary Flores conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint investigation visit regarding the above allegation. LPA met with Lydia Pabion and explained the reason of the visit. The investigation consisted of the following: On 10/15/24 LPA conducted and initial complaint investigation visit. During the initial visit LPA requested staff/resident roster, resident #1(R1)’s physician’s report dated: 8/21/23, admission agreement, pre-appraisal, needs and care plan, medication sheet, incident report. LPA interviewed Resident #1-#3(R1-R3) and 5 staff. On 10/18/24 LPA interviewed R1’s Assisted Living Waiver (ALW) case manager over the phone and obtained documents. On 10/21/24 LPA interviewed R1’s Power of Attorney (POA) over the phone. On 10/29/24 LPA Flores delivered findings for the above allegation. (CONTINUED ON LIC 9099C) Substantiated The investigation revealed the following: Regarding allegation: Facility staff did not provide adequate supervision resulting in a resident eloping from the facility. It is alleged a resident with dementia went missing for several hours. On 9/27/24 around 12:30pm R1 left the facility unattended with another resident. R1 did not return to the facility. Per administrator the facility’s policy is 24 hours to report the resident missing. Med-tech checked for R1 the morning of 9/28/24, R1 was not found. Med-tech contacted Pasadena police department to file a missing person report. A few hours later administrator was informed by Pasadena police department that they responded to a call for a person that seem to be confused around Del Mar and San Marino. Once the description was matched administrator and another staff went to pick up R1 around 11:00am from the area and returned R1 to the facility. No medical assessment was conducted. Interviews conducted with staff revealed R1 seems forgetful. However, staff believe R1 does not have dementia. Per staff, they know that R1 should not leave the facility unattended and when they see R1 in the lobby they redirect R1 to either R1’s room or dining room. LPA was unable to obtained information regarding the incident as R1 did not recall the incident. R2 who left the facility with R1 stated that when they were out R1 wanted to go for a walk, and they parted ways. Documents review revealed, two physician’s reports were obtained by LPA for R1; physician’s report dated: 8/21/23 notes R1’s has dementia and cannot leave the facility unattended. Physician’s report also dated: 8/21/23 obtained at the facility notes R1 has mild cognitive impairment and cannot leave the facility unattended. Medication sheet for September notes R1 is taking a medication prescribed for cognitive impairment. Therefore, the allegation is substantiated. Based on LPAs observations and interviews which were conducted record review(s), the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation(s) is found to be substantiated. California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6 and Chapter 8 are being cited on the attached LIC 9099D. *Immediate $500 Civil penalties were assessed due to lack of care and supervision.* Exit interview was conducted with Lydia Pabion and a copy of this report, LIC 9099D, and appeal rights were provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 29, 2024 · control 28-AS-20241011081106
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87466 · Plan of correction due date: Oct 30, 2024
Observation of the Resident: The licensee shall ensure that residents are regularly observed for changes in physical, mental, ... such changes are documented and brought to the attention of the resident's physician and the resident's responsible person, if any. This requirement is not met as evidence by: Based on documents review and interviews conducted licensee did not ensure R1 was properly assess or reasses based on changes in condition which poses an immediate health, safety, or personal right to the persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 29, 2024
Plan of correction: Administrator will obtain a physician's reassessment for R1, will assist R1 based on reassement, and will provide a copy to the department by POC due date 10/30/24. **Immediate $500 Civil Penalties were assess**
Oct 10, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff neglected resident's wound in care
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Alberto Lopez made a subsequent visit to continue investigation and deliver findings for the above mentioned allegation. LPA met with Administrator Lydia Pabion and discussed purpose of visit. LPA interviewed Five (5) residents and one (1) additional staff S#1 during this visit. LPA took tour of facility and did not observed any health and safety Hazards. On 09/25/2023; LPA conducted a health and safety check and took a tour of the physical plant including the common areas, kitchen, dining room, medications room, and five (5) resident rooms. LPA measured the water temperature, and it was within 105-120 degrees F. LPA observed that there was at least a 7-day supply of non-perishable foods, and a 2-day supply of perishable foods and medications were centrally stored and locked. The facility was clean and in good repair and there were no observable signs of neglect, abuse or other immediate health and safety threats. (Continue on 9099C) Substantiated The investigation consisted of LPA interviewing five (5) residents (R#2-R#6) , R1 was not available for LPA to interview. LPA interviewed three (3) staff (S#1-S#3) and reviewed the following documents, staff roster, resident roster, and for three (3) specified residents: resident face sheet, MAR log for July, August September 2023, physician’s report, most recent incident report and appraisal needs & services, Noyan Home Health records, facility progress notes, R1 hospital records. R1 LIC602A for R1 dated 01/19/2022, 11/02/22, and 04/12/2023 The investigation revealed: Regarding Allegation: Staff neglected resident's wound in care LPA interviewed three (3) staff and three of three (3) staff denied the allegation. LPA interviewed five (5) residents and five (5) of (5) residents could not corroborate the allegation. According to records reviewed and obtained, R1 was admitted to facility on 01/17/2022 and at that time, records show that R1 had skin intact without any open wounds. According to medical records, R1 wound care was ordered by Medical Doctor on 06/15/2023. Review of Home Health records show that R1 had developed a stage 4 wound by 06/30/2023. Department review of Noyan Home Health records indicate that resident refused wound care on the following days: 07/01,02,03,04,06,07,08,09,13,15,16,18,20,22,23,27,29,30th. According to records reviewed, R1 also refused wound care for days in August and September 2023. S2 stated she discussed R1 refusal of wound care with Administrator S1 and mentioned to Administrator S1 that resident required higher level of care. Both S1 and S2 admitted to the department that R1 refused wound care while at the facility. S1 admitted to the department that the facility is no longer able to meet R1 needs due to his high-risk behavior that causes safety concerns and R1 requires a higher level of care elsewhere. Under the admission agreement, the facility should have notified R1 physician and/or other appropriate persons regarding his change in condition and refusal of wound care treatment. R1 basic services under the facility admission agreement were not met. R1 actions could have possibly met the criteria for eviction under the admission agreement, but the administrator, S1, chose not to do anything about it and continued to house R1 at the facility, making him a risk to himself and others. By retaining R1 at facility, facility neglected R1 wound care. Based on interviews conducted and documents reviewed, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. California Code of Regulations, Tittle 22, Division 6 and Chapter 8 are being cited. The facility has been informed that Immediate civil penalty is being issued during today’s visit in the amount of $500.00, based on health and safety code 1569.49. “The licensee was informed that a civil penalty might be assessed based on the Health & Safety Code 1569.49(e) or (f), or 1548(e) or (f), or 1568.0822(e) or (f). “ Exit interview was conducted with Lydia Pabion, Administrator and a copy of this report, LIC 9099D, and appeal rights were provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 10, 2024 · control 28-AS-20230922133247
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87468.2(a)(8) · Plan of correction due date: Oct 11, 2024
Additional Personal Rights of Residents in Privately Operated Facilities (a)...: To be free from neglect, financial exploitation, involuntary seclusion, punishment, humiliation, intimidation, and verbal, mental, physical, or sexual abuse. This requirement is not met as evidence by: Based on department interviews conducted and documents reviewed licensee failed to ensure R1 did not develop a wound and neglected wound care by retaining R1 with stage 4 wound which poses an immediate risk to the health, safety, or personal rights to the persons in care. *Immediate Civil Penalty for $500 is being issue*the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 10, 2024
Plan of correction: Administrator will certify in writing that staff including administrator will follow up on any medical need(s) of residents who refuse care and upon observation, communication, or discovery of such and will provide training to staff on the above and submit training logs to the department by POC due date of 10/11/2024.
Oct 10, 2024Facility evaluation reportCase Management - DeficienciesDeficiency pages: Type B, Type A
Type of visit: Case Management - Deficiencies
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Alberto Lopez made a subsequent visit to continue investigation and deliver findings for the for complaint 28-AS-20230922133247. LPA met with Staff Jose Deleon, and Administrator Lydia Pabion arrived a few minutes later and assisted with the visit. During the investigation for the complaint mentioned above, the department discovered that facility had three (3) other deficiencies. 1) The facility failed to report to the department all the incidents the resident refused wound care to the department and other parties including resident's doctor. 2) The facility falsified records. S2 wrote in resident's record that wound care was provided on more than one occasion and both S1 and S2 both admitted to the department was not actually done. 3) Medical assessment was not in file for R1 prior to admission to facility. Deficiencies cited on 809D, copy of report, 809D and appeal rights provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 10, 2024
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87211(a)(1)(d) · Plan of correction due date: Oct 17, 2024
87211(a)(1) 87211 Reporting Requirements: (a) Each licensee shall furnish..: (1)A written report shall be submitted to the licensing agency... within seven days of the occurrence...(D)Any incident which threatens the welfare, safety or health of any resident. This requirement is not met as evidence by: Facility did not report incidents when resident refused wound care during the months of July, August, and September, 2023the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 10, 2024
Plan of correction: Licensee will provide all the incident reports for the month of July, August and September 2023 for all the days the resident refused wound care. licensee will train all staff including administrator on reporting requirements and send signed log of staff attending, topic and name of trainer to LPA by POC date which is 10/17/2024
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR87458(a) · Plan of correction due date: Oct 17, 2024
87458 Medical Assessment (a)(a) Prior to a person's acceptance as a resident, the licensee shall obtain and keep on file, documentation of a medical assessment, signed by a physician, made within the last year. The licensee shall be permitted to use the form LIC 602 (Rev. 9/89), Physician's Report, to obtain the medical assessment. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: R1 LIC602 when admitted was not in resident's file and the LIC602A dated on 11/22/2022 was signed by medical doctor who stated he did not have R1 as patient.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 10, 2024
Plan of correction: The administrator will obtain and keep on file documentation of residents Medical Assessment or LIC602A signed by a physician prior to a person’s acceptance as a resident. The administrator will send LPA the future plan about obtaining medical assessment prior to accept resident by POC due date.
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87207 · Plan of correction due date: Oct 11, 2024
False Claims: No licensee, officer or employee of a licensee shall make or disseminate any false or misleading statement regarding the facility or any of the services provided by the facility. This deficiency was evidenced by the following: During the course of a complaint investigation, Facility provided hand written documentation indicating that S2 had provided wound care to R1 on several occasions. Both S1 and S2 told the department that wound care was not provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 10, 2024
Plan of correction: Licensee will document a statement indicating the understanding of the regulation and will confirm that all staff have been notified about consequences regarding false claims made to licensing staff.
Mar 4, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Illegal eviction
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Mary Flores conducted an unannounced complaint investigation visit regarding the above allegation. LPA met with Lydia Pabion and explain the reason of the visit. The investigation consisted of the following: LPA requested copies of staff/resident roster, reviewed resident #1’s file, and requested copies of identification and emergency sheet, physician’s report, admission agreement, notice to pay rent, receipts for payment from January 2023 – February 2024, to the facility. LPA interviewed 5 residents and 5 staff. The investigation revealed the following: Regarding allegation Illegal eviction it is alleged R1 was given an eviction notice on 2/23/24, for lack of rent payment, per complainant R1 has paid the rent in full every month. Interviews conducted with administrator and licensee revealed R1 has not been given an eviction notice yet. (CONTINUED ON LIC 9099C) Unsubstantiated He was provided a notice to pay to encourage resident to pay the balance due and have been waiting for R1 to make arrangements before providing R1 with a 30-day notice. Per administrator R1 pays $450 per month which is not the full amount due to the facility for the monthly rent and R1 has been reminded verbally of the amount due. Interviews with residents revealed residents were cleared of the amount due at the time of admission and the increase rate yearly on the addendum provided by the administrator. Staff interviewed stated that residents have not complaint about facility given them an illegal eviction. Documents review revealed a notice to pay rent in three days or quit in thirty days was given to R1 on 2/22/24 for the total amount due of $12,573.98 due from Jan. 1st, 2023 to Feb. 1st, 2024. Per addendum provided on 1/1/23 the monthly rate for 2023 was at $1344.82 and the addendum dated 1/1/24 monthly rate of $1418.07 per the state rate. LPA reviewed receipts of payment collected for the amount of $450 a month from 1/3/23 – 1/3/24 and $550 for 2/2/24, form of payment was noted as cash for a total of $6,400.00. Although the facility did requested payment for due balance, the facility has not provided an eviction notice at this time. Therefore, the allegation is unsubstantiated. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation(s) did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. Exit interview was conducted with Lydia Pabion and a copy of this report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 4, 2024 · control 28-AS-20240226102810
Feb 15, 2024Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst(LPA) Mary Flores conducted an unannounced annual visit at the facility using the CARE inspection tool. LPA met with and explained the reason for the visit. Facility is licensed to served 99 adults over the age of 60 years old, of which 35 may be non-ambulatory. Facility has a hospice waiver for 4 and the following rooms are cleared for bedridden residents; 102 thru 110, 115 thru 119, and 123. Facility is a two story building with a commercial kitchen, a dining room, an activity room, a courtyard, a medication room, and front porch. No large bodies of water were observed. Sprinkler fire system throughout the facility. Fire extinguishers in hallways in each floor. LPA conducted a tour of the facility and observed the following: Activity area is clean, fireplace is inaccessible to residents. Dining room was observed in good repair and clean. Kitchen was observed clean, storage of food supplies was observed with sufficient perishables for at least 2 days, and non-perishables for 7 days. Kitchen wall behind the stove, was observed caved into the kitchen and with a gap between the floor and the wall the length of more than half the size of the wall and the width of about 3 inches. LPA observed 5 random resident rooms and observed sufficient lighting, furniture, and bedding supplies. Each room has a bathroom and were observed in working condition, with grab bars, and skid mats. Water temperature was tested between 110.6 - 138.3 degrees F. which is not within the required 105-120 degrees F. Shower faucet in room #207 was observed cracked and missing half of the faucet. Ramps, and stairways were observed clear of obstructions. Stairways are missing an evacuation chair. Courtyard provides shaded sitting area, front porch provides sitting area, and back area provides a smoking area. Carbon monoxide/Smoke detectors were tested and are in working condition. Facility stores additional linens, and cleaning supplies were observed in a closet. Sharps are stored in the kitchen and residents do not have access to the kitchen. (CONTINUED ON LIC 809C) LPA reviewed medications for 5 residents, resident #2(R2) was out of prescribed medication filled on 1/25/24 and LVN stated to have been giving R2 additional pills due to R2 requesting it. Per prescription R2 is to have 2 pills per day, LVN has been providing more per day. LPA reviewed 5 resident and 5 staff files. Emergency Disaster plan and Infection control plans were reviewed last reviewed/updated in 2022. A copy of Liability Insurance was provided. Administrator certificate was observed for Lydia Pabion #6006152740 exp: 8/10/25. Deficiencies are noted on LIC 809D per Title 22 Regulations. Exit interview was conducted with Lydia Pabion and a copy of this report, LIC 809D, and appeal rights were provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 15, 2024
The state marks this report as 7 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 4. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.
Feb 9, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff did not provide correct medication. Untrained staff is providing medication to residents. Staff does not treat residents with dignity and respect. Staff not assisting resident with needs.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Bennette Pena conducted a subsequent complaint visit to investigate the above allegations. LPA met with Lydia Pabion, Administrator and explained the reason for the visit. The initial complaint visit was conducted on 12/28/2023. During the initial and subsequent complaint visits, the investigation consisted of the following: LPA conducted a physical plant tour of the facility, interviewed Resident #1- Resident #11 (R1- R11) and Staff #1- Staff #7 (S1- S7) altogether. LPA unable to interview Staff #8 (S8) who was not on duty. LPA also attempted to interview Resident #12 (refused to speak to LPA/on Hospice care) and Resident #13 (R13) - Resident #14 (R14) but unsuccessful as they are both non verbal. LPA obtained copies of the Resident and Staff Rosters, reviewed Residents #1-#2 (R1-R2's) file documents such as; Face Sheet, Needs and Services Plan, Physician's Report LIC 602, and Progress notes. Additionally, (5) Staff files, (3) additional Resident files (R3-R5), (5) random residents Medication Administration Records (MARs dated Oct 2023- Dec 2023), Staff In-service training logs (2022-2023) and Plan of Operation were reviewed. *****CONTINUED ON LIC9099-C***** Unsubstantiated The investigation revealed the following: In regards to the allegation: “Staff did not provide correct medication.” It is alleged that staff do not provide supervision when administrating medication to residents and do not provide the correct medication. No other details provided. The interviewed staff denied the allegation. S1 indicated that Caregivers are not allowed to pass medications because they do not have medication training. Staff members interviewed also indicated that they provide clients with their medications as prescribed following doctors’ orders. Other interviewed staff indicated that they received medication training as part of the educational requirements and get enough training from the Administrator to make sure that they administer the medications to the residents correctly. Interviewed residents stated that the staff never provided them with the incorrect medication. (11) of (11) residents indicated that the staff give them their medication on time and only those prescribed by their doctors. LPA reviewed (5) random residents Medication Administration Records (MARs dated Oct 2023- Dec 2023), their medications including PRNs and observed medications to be documented properly and given as prescribed. Records reviewed did not show any past or current issues regarding medication being given out to the residents incorrectly. Documentation reviewed and interviews conducted with staff and residents do not corroborate this allegation. In regards to the allegation: “Untrained staff is providing medication to residents.” It is alleged that staff let caregivers administer medications to residents. The interviewed staff denied the allegation. S1 stated that based on their policy, only staff who have medication training are responsible for preparing and administering medications to residents. S1 indicated that none of the caregivers are allowed to pass medications because they do not have medication training. Interviewed staff indicated that only the Nurse and Med Techs are responsible to administer the medications to the residents because they have the required training. LPA reviewed (3) staff training files and their records indicated that they have all been trained in medication management, policy and procedures regarding medication, documentation, side effects and adverse reactions. Interviewed residents stated that either the Nurse or Med Techs provide them with their medications, not the caregivers. LPA did not find additional evidence that residents have been hospitalized or injured because of medication errors. Based on the information obtained, there was not enough supportive evidence to concur with the reported allegation. In regards to the allegation: “Staff does not treat residents with dignity and respect.” It is alleged that staff fight with residents due to them asking for additional help and being too loud at the facility. Staff members interviewed denied the allegation. All staff interviewed indicated that they treat all residents equally and with respect. Staff indicated that they do not fight with residents due to them asking for additional help and being too loud at the facility because they understand that the residents are here because they need help. Staff also indicated that they receive training regarding residents’ personal rights. (2) out of (7) staff interviewed stated that they have heard and witnessed S2 yelled and became impatient with some residents in the past. (9) out of (11) residents interviewed denied the allegation and indicated facility staff treat them with respect and dignity. Some residents interviewed indicated that they are happy with their interactions and the services they receive from facility staff. (2) out of (11) residents stated that they have heard S2 yelled at residents sometimes. LPA reviewed the staff in-service training logs (2022-2023) indicating that the staff received training on residents’ personal rights. During the visit, LPA did not observe any staff to be disrespectful to residents. LPA also observed sufficient staff providing the services necessary to meet the residents’ needs. Therefore, there was insufficient evidence to corroborate the allegation. In regards to the allegation: “Staff not assisting resident with needs.” It is alleged that a resident has considered committing suicide due to feeling like a burden to the facility because staff are not helping the residents with his needs. It is also alleged that another resident recently went to the hospital due to an infection that could have been caused by staff not changing the diaper as often as needed. Additionally, the resident does not want to ask for help because staff mistreat the resident. Interviewed staff denied the allegation. None of the staff interviewed heard or received a report regarding a resident being hospitalized due to an infection nor a resident committing suicide. Staff stated that they provide care and assistance to meet the residents’ needs. Staff also stated that they conduct rounds every 2-3 hours to do incontinent care or even sooner if necessary and check on residents. (10) out of (11) residents denied the allegation and stated that staff always assist them with their daily needs. None of the residents knew or heard about another resident considered committing suicide or had been sent to the hospital due to an infection. LPA reviewed R2’s files and did not find any records showing hospitalization due to infection. Therefore, there was insufficient evidence to corroborate the allegation. Based on statements and interviews conducted with staff, residents, review of resident files and facility file records, there was not enough supportive evidence to concur with the reported allegations. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED. Exit interview held and a copy of this report was provided to Lydia Pabion, Administrator.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 9, 2024 · control 28-AS-20231222091841
Jan 9, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff is sleeping at the facility.
*This report supersedes report dated 11/07/2023 due to findings changed for 1 allegation* Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Mora and Vaid conducted an unannounced complaint visit regarding the above allegations. LPAs met with Lydia Pabion (Administrator) and explained the reason for the visit. The investigation consisted of the following: LPAs obtained copies of staff and resident rosters, reviewed pest control reports dating back to June 2023, and interviewed Administrator, Staff 1 - Staff 6 (S1 - S6) and Resident 1 - Resident 7 (R1 - R7). LPAs also toured 3 resident rooms and the facility's TV room. The investigation revealed the following: regarding the allegation "staff are sleeping at the facility", it is alleged that staff are sleeping at the facility during their shifts. Administrator stated 2 months ago she reviewed her camera footage and noticed a graveyard staff sleeping on job. She confronted the staff and the staff resigned on 09/14/23. Administrator stated this was a one time incident and no other staff have slept on the job. Staff interviewed could not corroborate the allegation. Residents interviewed could not corroborate the allegation. (Continued to LIC 9099-C) Substantiated Based on LPA's interviews, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the allegation is found SUBSTANTIATED. California Code of Regulations Title 22, Division 6, and Chapter 8 are being cited on the attached LIC 9099D. Exit interview held and a copy of the report and appeal rights was provided. The other residents interviewed could not corroborate the allegation. During the tour, LPAs did not observed bedbugs in the facility's TV room nor in rooms 201 and 227. Room 205 was locked due to resident was out in the community. LPAs also reviewed pest control reports dating back to June 2023 and all reports stated no activity was noticed. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated. Exit interview held and a copy of the report was providedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 9, 2024 · control 28-AS-20231030095916
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87411(a) · Plan of correction due date: Jan 16, 2024
Personnel Requirements - General (a) Facility personnel shall at all times be sufficient in numbers, and competent to provide the services necessary to meet resident needs..... Based on interviews, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above which poses a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care. A staff was caught sleeping on the job.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 9, 2024
Plan of correction: Licensee is to comply with Title 22 Section 87411 at all times. Additionally, Licensee will conduct an in-service training with all staff and submit a training log with all staff signatures to Community Care Licensing Division (CCLD) by 01/16/2024.
Earlier years2021 to 2023 · 12 documents
20234 state visits · 4 documents
Nov 7, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Facility has bedbugs. Staff are sleeping at the facility.
Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Mora and Vaid conducted an unannounced complaint visit regarding the above allegations. LPAs met with Lydia Pabion (Administrator) and explained the reason for the visit. The investigation consisted of the following: LPAs obtained copies of staff and resident rosters, reviewed pest control reports dating back to June 2023, and interviewed Administrator, Staff 1 - Staff 6 (S1 - S6) and Resident 1 - Resident 7 (R1 - R7). LPAs also toured 3 resident rooms and the facility's TV room. The investigation revealed the following: regarding the allegation "facility has bedbugs", it is alleged that there are bedbugs in rooms 201, 205, 227 and the facility's TV room. Administrator denied the allegation and stated no bedbugs complaints have been brought to her attention. Staff interviewed could not corroborate the allegations. Residents in rooms 201 and 227 denied having bedbugs and resident in room 205 was out in the community and not available for an interview. (Continued to LIC 9099-C) Unsubstantiated The other residents interviewed could not corroborate the allegation. During the tour, LPAs did not observed bedbugs in the facility's TV room nor in Room 201 and 227. Room 205 was locked due to resident was out in the community. LPAs also reviewed pest control reports dating back to June 2023 and all reports stated no activity was noticed. Regarding the allegation "staff are sleeping at the facility", it is alleged that staff are sleeping at the facility during their shifts. Administrator stated 2 months ago she reviewed her camera footage and noticed a graveyard staff sleeping on job. She confronted the staff and the staff resigned on 09/14/23. Administrator stated this was a one time incident and no other staff have slept on the job. Staff interviewed could not corroborate the allegation. Residents interviewed could not corroborate the allegation. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are unsubstantiated. Exit interview held and a copy of the report was providedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 7, 2023 · control 28-AS-20231030095916
Jun 19, 2023Facility evaluation reportAnnual/RandomDeficiency pages: Type B, Type A
Type of visit: Annual/Random
This is a corrected version of previous Annual Visit dated 01/28/23. LIC 809-D page was amended to correct deficiency from "Type A" to "Type B" for 87303(e)(2) only. Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kimberly Ramirez conducted an unannounced required Annual Visit on 01/28/2023 at 9:25 am. LPA was met by Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) Gloria Madrid and Activities Director Roxana Deleon. Administrator Lydia Pabion was notified by phone of LPA’s visit. LPA requested and obtained a copy of Personnel Report (LIC 500), Resident Roster (LIC 9020) and copy of Liability Insurance. Facility is licensed to served 99 adults over the age of 60 years old, of which 35 may be non-ambulatory. Facility has a hospice waiver for 4 and the following rooms are cleared for bedridden residents; 102 thru 110, 115 thru 119, and 123. Facility is a two-story building with a commercial kitchen, a dining room, an activity room, a courtyard, medication room, and front porch. No large bodies of water were observed. Sprinkler fire system throughout the facility. Fire extinguishers in hallways in each floor were observed to fully charged. LPA OBSERVATIONS: Tour was given by LVN Madrid at 9:40 am. TV Room: was clean and had sufficient seating and tables. Kitchen: Staff was observed to be wearing masks, hair nets and gloves while preparing lunch for residents. LPA observed kitchen to be clean and appliances appeared to be in working order. Walk in refrigerator was observed to contain sufficient food supply for 2 days of perishables and 7 days of non-perishables and a temperature reading of 40 degrees F. Walk in freezer was clean and a temperature reading of 0 degrees F. Kitchen sink water temperature was measured at 184.1 degrees F. No warning sign posted above this sink or any other kitchen sink in kitchen area was observed. Signs promoting hand washing and social distancing were observed. Dining Room: Dining room area was clean, and tables were spaced out to promote social distancing. Signs promoting social distancing and cough/sneeze etiquette were observed throughout dining area. LPA observed a corner area of dining room to have several stacked dining room chairs, rectangle bbq grill, empty grocery cart, 4ft standing fan, boxed Christmas tree, and a beige serving cart to be cluttered in the corner of the room. Per LVN Madrid, the facility is using this area to store excess chairs until they can find another place to store them. Resident rooms 1st floor Non-Ambulatory: Rooms # 101 and 104 contained the required lighting, furniture, and linens. Water temperature in Room # 101-bathroom was measured at 106.2 degrees F and room # 104 water temperature in bathroom was measured at 107.8 degrees F which meets Title 22 Regulations. Room #108 is a shared room. Room #108 contained required lighting, furnishings, and linens. Bathroom contained skid matts and grab bars. Water temperature was measured at 99.8 degrees F which is does not meet Title 22 Regulations and poses an immediate health, safety, or personal rights risk to persons in care. Cabinet doors in bathroom are missing knobs and right cabinet door is cracked from top to the side of door. Resident rooms 2nd floor Ambulatory: Resident room # 201 contained required lighting, furnishings, and linens. Room was clean and LPA observed hand sanitizer nearby. Water temperature in bathroom was measured at 96.8 degrees F which does not meet Title 22 Regulations. Resident room # 209 contained required lighting, furnishings, and linens. Room was observed to be clean. Water temperature in bathroom was measured at 95.4 degrees F which does not meet Title 22 Regulations. Resident room # 220 contained required lighting, furnishings, and linens. Room was observed to be clean. Water temperature in bathroom was measured at 99.1 degrees F which does not meet Title 22 Regulations. Resident room # 223 contained required lighting, furnishings, and linens. Room was observed to be clean. Water temperature in bathroom was measured at 110.4 degrees F which meets Title 22 Regulations. Front lobby and Courtyard: Clean and free from hazards and clutter. LPA observed plenty of seating, tables and shade for residents and visitors. Staff and Resident Interviews: 3 staff and 3 residents were interviewed between 10:45 am and 11:15 am. Administrator certificate was observed for Lydia Pabion #6006152740 expiration date: 8/10/23. Last fire drill was conducted on 01/2023. A technical violation and deficiencies were cited during visit. Exit interview was conducted with Activities Director Deleon and a copy of this report, LIC 809D, LIC 9102, and appeal rights were provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 19, 2023
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87303(e)(2) · Plan of correction due date: Jan 29, 2023
(e) Water supplies and plumbing fixtures shall be maintained as follows: (2) Faucets used by residents for personal care such as shaving and grooming shall deliver hot water. Hot water temperature controls shall be maintained to automatically regulate the temperature of hot water used by residents to attain a temperature of not less than 105 degree F (41 degrees C) and not more than 120 degree F (49 degrees C). This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on observation, resident room #108 water temperature read at 99.8 degrees F, resident room #201 water temperature read at 96.8 degrees F, resident room #209 water temperature read at 95.4 degrees F, resident room #220 water temperature read at 99.1 degrees F, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in which poses an immediate health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 19, 2023
Plan of correction: Licensee/Administrator will adjust water heater accordingly and create a water log starting 01/29/2023 and record water temperature readings every 8 hours for the next 3 calendar days, ending on 02/01/2023. Licensee/ Administrator will send proof of water temperature log to LPA via email. First record of water log on 01/29/23 and subsequent recorded readings must measure within 105 -120 degress F.
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87303(e)(3) · Plan of correction due date: Jan 29, 2023
(e) Water supplies and plumbing fixtures shall be maintained as follows: (3) Taps delivering water at 125 degree F (52 degrees C) or above shall be prominently identified by warning signs. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on observation, water temperature in kitchen was measured at 184.1 degrees F, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in which poses an immediate health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 19, 2023
Plan of correction: Licensee/Administrator will place a warning signs above kitchen sinks where water temperature will be delivering water at 125 degree F or above.
Jun 6, 2023Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Resident was sexually abused while in care.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Flores conducted a subsequent complaint visit. LPA met with Lydia Pabion and explained the reason for the visit. The purpose of today's visit is to deliver findings for LPA Irra who was assigned this complaint. On 07/15/21, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Spencer conducted a Health and Safety check visit in response to the above personal rights allegation. LPA met with administrator Lydia Pabion. During this visit, LPA Spencer conducted a health and safety check and took a tour of the physical plant including the common areas, kitchen, dining room, medications room, and five (5) resident rooms. The facility was clean and in good repair and there were no observable signs of neglect, abuse or other immediate health and safety threats. LPA Spencer obtained a copy of staff roster, resident roster, and for three (3) specified residents: resident face sheet, MAR log, physician's report, and appraisal needs & services plan. (CONTINUED ON LIC 9099C) Substantiated The investigation for this allegation was conducted by Investigator Dennis Seng. During this investigation, IB Investigator Dennis Seng, conducted interviews with staff (including the suspect/Staff #1 (S1)), witnesses and Resident #1 (Victim/R1). It was determined that R1 was a victim of sexual abuse by S1 at the facility. R1 stated that the relationship between R1 and S1 was consensual “due to R1 being overly medicated on medication” during R1’s treatment for a medical condition. R1 indicated S1 hugged R1, fondled/sucked on R1’s breasts, and kissed R1 on R1’s lips during multiple occasions. S1 was also discovered by Staff #2 (S2) hiding inside R1’s closet without an explanation. S1 denied sucking/fondling R1’s breasts or that S1 engaged in any sexual activity/abuse; however, S1 admitted to hugging and kissing R1 on R1’s lips on several occasions. S1 admitted that S1 was caught in R1’s closet by S2 and stated that S1 hid in R1’s closet because S1 knew the situation “looked bad”. Facility staff became suspicious of S1’s relationship with R1 and asked S1 about it. S1 admitted he/she was in a relationship with R1 and forwarded facility staff text messages between S1 and R1. Due to the totality of the situation, S-1 statements, text messages exchanged between S-1 and R-1, S-1 hiding in R-1’s closet, and the lack of explanation to justify why S-1 was hiding in R-1’s closet, it was more than likely S-1 did fondle/sexually abused R-1. Based on interviews conducted and records reviewed, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. California Code of Regulations, Tittle 22, Division 6 and Chapter 8 is being cited. An immediate Civil Penalty of $500 is being issued today. Refer to LIC421IM. The issuance of an additional Civil Penalty is being assessed based on Health and Safety Code 1569.49(f) and could be issued at a later date. Exit interview held. A copy of the report, LIC421IM, and Appeal Rights were provided to Lydia Pabion Administrator.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 6, 2023 · control 28-AS-20210714145302
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87468.1(a)(1) · Plan of correction due date: Jun 7, 2023
Personal Rights of Residents in All Facilities (a) Residents in all residential care facilities for the elderly shall have all of the following personal rights: (1) To be accorded dignity in their personal relationships with staff, residents, and other persons. This standard was not met as evidenced by: S1 admitted to hugging and kissing R1 on R1’s lips on several occasions. S1 admitted being caught in R1’s closet by S2 and stated he/she hid in the closet because S1 knew the situation “looked bad”.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 6, 2023
Plan of correction: Administrator to provide all staff with personal rights training. Training plan will be submitted by 6/7/23. Proof of training will be submitted by 6/14/23. Immediate civil penalties assessed.
Jan 30, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Facility staff not repairing broken heating system at facility. Facility staff not meeting residents' needs for activities at facility.
Licensing Program Analyst(s)(LPA) Mary Flores conducted an unannounced complaint investigation visit regarding the above allegation(s). LPA Flores met with Lydia Pabion Administrator and explained the reason for the visit. The investigation consisted of the following: LPA Flores requested a copy of resident/staff roster, conducted a tour of facility's resident rooms #103,108,112,117,224,220,211,204, a total of 12 thermostats were observed throughout the facility's hallways next to the following rooms #104,107,111,119,232,227,220,216,212,208,201 all set up and read at 72 degrees F. except for thermostat next to room #107 read at 69 degrees F and set up at 72 degrees F., and thermostat next to room# 232 which was set up at 74 and read at 72 degrees F. Interviewed resident #1(R1),#2(R2),#3(R3),#4(R4),#5(R5) and staff #1(S1),#2(S2),#3(S3),#4(S4) and #5(S5). LPA Flores reviewed activity calendar for the month of January 2023, S3 duties and responsibilities sheets. (CONTINUED ON LIC 9099C) Unsubstantiated The investigation revealed the following: Regarding allegation: Facility staff not repairing broken heating system at facility. It is alleged that the heating system at the facility is broken. Interviews with residents revealed 3 out of 5 residents interview stated temperature at the facility is good and has not been cold in their rooms and/or hallways. 1 out of 5 residents interviewed stated temperature in the room is cold in the evening and 1 out of 5 residents was unable to be interview due to cognitive skills. Licensee stated heating system has not been broken. Interview with staff revealed 5 out of 5 staff stated temperature is preset at 72 degrees F., during the winter. During the facility tour conducted LPA observed the temperature was set at 72 degrees around the facility. The lowest reading was 69 degrees F., the rooms around that thermostat felt the same as the rest of the facility temperature wise. All other rooms observed felt at a comfortable temperature. Room #204 was slightly colder than the rest of the facility. During the visit Maintenance person contacted A/C/Heater technician and the temperature in that area of the building was address to ensure it match the reading on the thermostat. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. Regarding allegation: Facility staff not meeting residents' needs for activities at facility. It is alleged facility staff is not meeting residents' needs for activities at facility. Interviews with residents revealed 3 out of 5 residents stated activities are offered and residents are part of the activities such as: exercises, bingo, art, etc. 1 out of 5 residents stated not to participate in the activities and performs activities on their own. 1 out of 5 residents was unable to answer due to cognitive skills. Interviews with staff revealed 5 out of 5 staff interview stated activities are provided to the residents throughout the day by the activity director. LPA reviewed activity calendar for January 2023 and observed activities such as: lottery, art classes, bingo, going to the store, movies, birthday celebrations are schedule in the afternoon on different days of the week. Exercises are schedule in the morning daily. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. Exit interview was conducted with Lydia Pabion Administrator and a copy of this report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 30, 2023 · control 28-AS-20230124121154
20223 state visits · 4 documents
Aug 29, 2022Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff member mismanages residents’ medication Staff failed to meet residents' needs
Licensing Program Analyst(s)(LPA) Mary Flores conducted an unannounced complaint investigation visit regarding the above allegation(s). LPA met with Lydia Pabion Administrator and explained the reason for the visit. The investigation consisted of the following: LPA Flores requested a copy of the staff/resident roster. LPA Flores reviewed medication for Resident #1(R1),#2(R2),#3(R3),#4(R4),#5(R5),#6(R6) and interviewed R1,R2,R3,R4R5,R6, staff #1(S1),#2(S2),#3(S3),#4(S4). LPA toured the facility and observed rooms #107,108,118,212, and 219. LPA Flores requested copies of medication sheets for June, July, August, medication delivery invoices, physician's reports, admission agreement, identification and appraisal/needs and care plan. (CONTINUED ON LIC 9099C) Unsubstantiated The investigation revealed the following: Regarding allegation: Staff member mismanages residents' medication. It is alleged staff administers the residents’ medication too early and it conflicts with the residents’ last medication doses. Interviews with residents revealed 3 out of 6 residents interviewed stated to be receiving medication at the times provided and that it does not interfere with their other doses. 1 out of 6 residents stated to not take medication. 1 out of 6 residents was unable to be interview due to cognitive skills and 1 out of 6 residents refused to be interview. Interviews with staff revealed 4 out of 4 staff stated medication is provided to the residents for each dose according to the prescription. Administrator stated that morning dose is provided to residents between 7:30am - 8:00am, Noon dose is provided between 11:30am - 12:00pm, Evening dose is provided between 4:30pm - 5:00pm and Bedtime dose is provided between 7:30pm - 8:00pm. LPA Flores reviewed medication sheets for R1,R2,R3,R4,R5,R6 did not observed any medication listed that will interfere with other medication provide to the residents based on the doses or times. Facility last provided medication training to S3 and S4 on 8/21/22 and S2 vocational nurse license expires on 11/30/22. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is Unsubstantiated. Regarding allegation: Staff failed to meet residents' needs. It is alleged the facility doesn’t provide masks to residents/staff members and doesn’t enforce masks at the facility. Interviews with residents revealed 4 out of 6 residents stated staff wear a face mask at the facility and provide a face mask when needed and facility is meeting their needs. 1 out of 6 residents was unable to be interview due to cognitive skills and 1 out of 6 residents refused to be interviewed. Interviews with staff revealed 3 out of 4 staff stated facility provides face mask for staff and residents and 1 out of 4 staff stated not to be sure if facility continues to provide face mask for staff or residents. LPA Flores observed administrator maintains mask at the facility, staff were observed wearing a face mask during the tour of the facility. No further details were provided in the complaint description regarding the needs of the residents not being met. Based on interviews conducted and observations made, there was insufficient evidence to prove the allegation(s).Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is Unsubstantiated. Exit interview was conducted with Lydia Pabion - Administrator and a copy of this report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 29, 2022 · control 28-AS-20220822155527
Aug 29, 2022Facility evaluation reportCase Management - DeficienciesDeficiency pages: Type B
Type of visit: Case Management - Deficiencies
Licensing Program Analyst(s)(LPA) Mary Flores conducted a case management visit during a complaint investigation visit conducted on 8/29/22. LPA Flores met with Lydia Pabion Administrator and explained the reason for the visit. On 8/29/22 LPA Flores reviewed medication sheets for Resident #1(R1),#2(R2),#3(R3),#4(R4),#5(R5),#6(R6) during the review LPA Flores observed medication sheets were not updated for morning dose provided to each resident. Per facility's nurse (LVN) medication is provide to residents either during breakfast at the dining room, or residents walk to the medication room to request, or provided in the residents room and does not note after providing the dose to each resident at the time each is provided. LPA Flores observed medication bubble packs are out of cycle and was unable to identify if medication was provided that morning. LPA Flores observed medication bubble pack for Resident #7 was crossed out with black marker and rename with red marker with R2's name. Per administrator pharmacy made a mistake in the order and place the order for R7 instead of R2. LPA Flores observed R2 and R7 had two sets of bubble packs for the same medication for each dose. Last medication training provided on 8/21/22, Deficiencies were given based on observations per Title 22 Division 6 Chapter 8 and noted on LIC809D. Exit interview was conducted with Lydia Pabion - Administrator and a copy of this report, LIC 809D, and appeal rights were provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 29, 2022
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87465(e) · Plan of correction due date: Sep 5, 2022
87465 Incidental Medical and Dental Record: (e) For every prescription and nonprescription... there shall be a signed, ..., and a label on the medication. Both the physician's order and the label shall contain at least all of the following information. This requirement is not met as evidence by: Based on observation licensee did not ensure medication for R2 had the proper pharmacy label which poses a potential risk to the health, personal rights, or safety of the residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 29, 2022
Plan of correction: Administrator will request medication with corrected label from pharmacy for medication for R2 and submit picture of the medication by 9/5/22.
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR87465(a)(6) · Plan of correction due date: Sep 5, 2022
87465 Incidental Medical and Dental Care: (a) A plan... shall be developed by each facility... (6) ... a record of dosages of medications which are centrally stored shall be maintained by the facility. This requirement is not met as evidence by: Based on observation licensee did not ensure Med techs are recording medication dosages provide to the residents at each dose for R1,R2,R3,R4,R5,R6 review which poses a potential risk to the health, personal rights, or safety of the residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 29, 2022
Plan of correction: Administrator will ensure medication provided to the residents is on cycle and record properly by staff on medication sheet by certifying on LIC 9098 by POC due date 9/5/22.
Jun 13, 2022Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Facility elevator is in disrepair.
Licensing Program Analyst(s)(LPA) Mary Flores conducted an unannounced complaint investigation visit regarding the above allegation(s). LPA Flores met with Lydia Pabion Administrator and explained the reason for the visit. The investigation consisted of the following: On 1/11/22 LPA Flores requested facilities resident and staff roster conducted a tour of the facility with Lydia Pabion, observed and used elevator to access 2nd floor, tour room #209, 216,219, 224. Interview residents #1(R1), #2(R2), #3(R3), #4(R4) and obtained copies of facility's fire disaster evacuation plan, and activities January 2022 schedule. On 6/13/22 LPA Flores requested staff/resident roster, interviewed resident #5(R5),#6(R6) and staff #1(S1),#2(S2),#3(S3),#4(S4),#5(S5) and obtained copies of physician's report, emergency and identification information sheet and medication sheets for December 2021, January, February, and May 2022 for 6 residents interviewed. (CONTINUED LIC 9099C) Substantiated The investigation revealed the following: Regarding allegation: Facility elevator is in disrepair. It is alleged the elevator is broken and has been for about a month. Interviews with residents revealed 3 out of 6 residents interview stated elevator is not working and residents have to use stairs causing some physical discomfort. 2 out of 6 residents interview stated not to use elevator as they reside in the first floor and 1 out of 6 residents refused to be interviewed. 5 out of 5 staff interviewed stated elevator was out of service in January and residents were assisted in stairway. On 1/11/22 Licensee stated a part on the board of the elevator had to be special order as the part is no longer produced by the company which delayed the repaired of the elevator. During the visit on 1/11/22 LPA Flores used the elevator to go to the second floor. LPA review service repairs invoice #41646 dated 12/27/21 notes "Returned Elevator to Service Ticket # 39334 12/02/21" and invoice #41647 dated 12/27/21 notes "Returned to service and ran as intended Ticket # 39359 12/09/21". Based on interviews conducted and documents reviewed, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. California Code of Regulations, Tittle 22, Division 6 and Chapter 8 are being cited. Exit interview was conducted with Lydia Pabion Administrator and a copy of this report, LIC 9099D, and appeal rights were provided. The investigation revealed the following: Regarding allegation: Residents are not being provided activities. It is alleged that due to the elevator not working, residents on the second floor are not able to come downstairs and engage in exercise and social activities. Interviews with residents revealed 3 out of 6 residents interview stated not to join activities provided by personal choice. 1 out of 6 residents interview stated residents in second floor are not able to join activities as "it is hard to come down" stairs. 1 out of 6 residents interview stated to join activities and receive assistance coming down stairs if needed. 1 out of 6 residents interview refused to be interviewed. Interviews with staff revealed, 5 out of 5 staff stated that residents were assisted to come down stairs to participate in activities. Documents reviewed revealed activity schedule for January 2022 list activities provided daily for residents in care and 4 out of 6 residents residing in the second floor are noted as ambulatory in physician's report. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED. Regarding allegation: Medications are not being administered to residents properly. It is alleged the elevator is use to bring medication carts with resident's medications, but now that elevator is not working results in staff not being able to fill the medication cup in front of the residents. Interviews with residents revealed 3 out of 6 residents stated to have received their medication during the time the elevator was out of service. 2 out of 6 residents do not take medication and 1 out of 6 residents refused to be interview. 5 out of 5 staff stated medications were being provided to residents in their room and previously preparing dose in the medication room, placing medication from bubble pack or container into a label cup with residents name and room number and carried in a tray instead of medication cart along with water to residents in second floor. Medication sheets reviewed revealed 4 out of 6 residents received medications during the time elevator was out of service. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED. Regarding allegation: Residents do not have a safe escape route in case of a fire. It is alleged if a fire were to happen at this facility many of the residents on the second floor who are wheelchair bound, or use walkers would be trapped because they would not be able to take the stairs to escape due to elevator not working. Interviews with residents revealed 3 out 6 residents interview stated to be able to use the stairs, (CONTINUED LIC 9099C) residents have physical discomfort but are not restrained from using stairs. 2 out of 6 residents interview do not use stairs as they reside in the first floor and 1 out of 6 residents refused to be interviewed. Staff interviews revealed 5 out of 5 staff stated that residents in the second floor are ambulatory but may use walker for support and when they use stairs staff provide assistance to ensure their safety. Documents reviewed revealed Fire Drill Report dated 12/3/21 was conducted at 1:00pm and on 2/25/22 at 1:40pm. Fire & Life Safety Inspection Form from City of South Pasadena Fire Department dated 9/2/21 notes that exit doors, aisles and stairways are free of obstruction and all exit doors are unlocked. Emergency and Disaster Plan for Residential Care Facilities for the Elderly was reviewed and updated on 11/2/21 and on 6/1/22. Physician's Reports reviewed revealed R1,R2,R3,R4 residing in second floor are ambulatory. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED. Exit interview was conducted with Lydia Pabion Administrator and a copy of this report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 13, 2022 · control 28-AS-20220104152734
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87303(a) · Plan of correction due date: Jun 13, 2022
87303 Maintenance and Operation: (a) The facility shall be clean, safe, sanitary and in good repair at all times. Maintenance shall include provision of maintenance services and procedures for the safety and well-being of residents, employees and visitors. This requirement is not met as evidence by: Based on interviews and documents reviewed licensee did not ensure elevator was in working conditions at all times wich poses a potential health, safety, or personal rights risk for residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 13, 2022
Plan of correction: Licensee provided elevator repaired order dated 1/19/22 during this visit. Deficiency has been cleared as of 6/13/22.
Feb 22, 2022Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst(s) (LPA) Mary Flores and Jewel Baptiste conducted an annual inspection visit at the facility with focus on the infection control domain, food and medication review. LPAs Flores and Baptiste met with Lydia Pabion administrator and explained the reason for the visit. Facility is licensed to served 99 adults over the age of 60 years old, of which 35 may be non-ambulatory. Facility has a hospice waiver for 4 and the following rooms are cleared for bedridden residents; 102 thru 110, 115 thru 119, and 123. Facility is a two story building with a commercial kitchen, a dining room, an activity room, a courtyard, a medication room, and front porch. No large bodies of water were observed. Sprinkler fire system throughout the facility. Fire extinguishers in hallways in each floor. LPA Baptiste conducted a walk through of the facility with Jose DeLeon - Maintenance around 12:10pm and observed the following: Kitchen area has sufficient food worth 2 days of perishables and 7 days of non-perishables. All bedrooms have sufficient lighting, furniture, and all required bedding. Bathrooms were observed with skid matts and grab bars. Water temperature was tested in bathrooms for rooms #104,108,114, 209,216, and 223 between 105.5- 117.1 degrees F, which is within the required 105-120 degrees F. LPA observed supplements (tums/vitamins) in room #114. Facility is currently following COVID-19 recommendations, signs were posted through out the facility, bathroom was observed with soap, signs and paper towels. Screening is conducted for clients, staff and visitors. LPA observed enough PPE supplies for at least 30 days. N95 fit testing has been conducted for all staff. All staff are wearing face mask. LPA Flores conducted a review of files and medication around 12:15pm for Resident #1,#2,#3,#4,#5 and staff files #1,#2,#3,#4, #5. Administrator certificate was observed for Lydia Pabion #6006152740 expiration date: 8/10/23. A technical violation was given during this visit. No deficiencies were noted. Exit interview was conducted with Lydia Pabion administrator and a copy of this report and technical violation was given.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 22, 2022
The state marks this report as 2 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 1. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.
20214 state visits · 4 documents
Oct 19, 2021Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Facility staff caused injury to resident. Facility staff handles resident in a rough manner. Facility staff threatened resident with eviction. Facility staff failed to meet resident's needs Food withheld from resident Medications are not refilled in a timely manner
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Angelica Rea conducted an unannounced complaint visit in response to the above allegations. LPA met with Administrator, Lydia Pabion who assisted with today's visit. Regarding the allegation that Facility staff caused injury to resident #1 and Facility staff handle resident #1 in a rough manner, the investigation consisted of interviews with Administrator, Staff #1 - #3, and interviews with Residents #2 - #5. Administrator and Staff interviewed denied the allegation. They stated that they have not observed any staff handle residents in a rough manner, and that staff have not caused injury to any resident. Staff indicated that they have been trained on how to treat the residents. Staff interviewed stated that they were not aware that resident #1 had any bruises on her body, and denied that resident #1 was handled in a rough manner. Residents interviewed were unable to corroborate the allegation. 4 out of 4 residents stated that they have not observed staff handle resident(s) in a rough manner and have not heard of staff causing any injury to residents. Residents stated that staff treat them well. Resident #1 no longer lives at the facility, and was not interviewed. Unsubstantiated Regarding the allegation that Facility staff threatened resident #1 with eviction, the investigation consisted of interviews with Administrator, Staff #1 - #3, and interviews with Residents #2 - #5. Administrator and Staff interviewed denied the allegation. They stated that they did not threaten resident #1 with eviction. Residents interviewed were unable to corroborate the allegation. 4 out of 4 residents interviewed stated that they have not observed staff threaten any residents with eviction. Resident #1 no longer lives at the facility, and was not interviewed. Regarding the allegation that Facility staff failed to meet resident #1's needs, specifically that resident #1's incontinent needs were not being met, the investigation consisted of interviews with Administrator, Staff #1 - #3, and interviews with Residents #2 - #5. Administrator and Staff interviewed denied the allegation. They stated that residents with incontinent needs are met. They stated that they order incontinence supplies in sizes to meet all of their residents needs. They denied that resident #1's incontinent needs were not met. Residents interviewed were unable to corroborate the allegation. 4 out of 4 residents interviewed stated that their needs are being met at the facility. They stated that to their knowledge the facility provides incontinence supplies to residents who need them. Resident #1 no longer lives at the facility, and was not interviewed. Regarding the allegation that Food was withheld from a resident, the investigation consisted of interviews with Administrator, Staff #1 - #3, and interviews with Residents #2 - #5. Administrator and Staff interviewed denied the allegation. They stated that they do not withhold food from any residents. Residents interviewed were unable to corroborate the allegation. 4 out of 4 residents interviewed stated that the facility provides sufficient food to all residents and food is not withheld. Resident #1 no longer lives at the facility, and was not interviewed. Regarding the allegation that Medications are not refilled in a timely manner, the investigation consisted of interviews with Administrator, Staff #1 - #3, and interviews with Residents #2 - #5. Administrator and Staff interviewed denied the allegation. They stated that staff order medications in a timely manner. Residents interviewed were unable to corroborate the allegation. 4 out of 4 residents interviewed stated that they have not had any problems with receiving their medications in a timely manner. Resident #1 no longer lives at the facility, and was not interviewed. Based on LPA's observations and interviews, investigation revealed: Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are unsubstantiated. No Deficiencies cited under California Code of Regulations Title 22. Exit interview conducted, and a copy of report was provided to Administrator, Lydia Pabion.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 19, 2021 · control 28-AS-20191122155817
Aug 16, 2021Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Facility staff engaged in inappropriate interactions with resident. Facility staff is financially abusing resident. Facility staff failed to safe guard resident's personal belongings.
Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Mary Flores and Luis Mora conducted an unannounced complaint investigation visit for the above allegations. LPAs met with Lydia Pabion administrator and explained the reason for the visit. The investigation consisted of the following: On 07/07/21, LPA Flores conducted a tour of the facility at 1:15pm which consisted of the common areas, kitchen, and random rooms #227, 210, 110, 107, 105 water temperature was tested in each room and tested between 77.6 to 114.5 degrees F which is not between the required 105 - 120 degrees F. LPA interview administrator and resident #1 (R1), and requested the following documents; Admission agreement, physician's report, medication sheet for June, any incident reports, face sheet for R1, resident #2(R2), #3(R3), #4(R4), #5(R5) and job description for staff #1 (S1), #2(S2), #3(S3), #4(S4), and staff and resident roster. LPA Flores interviewed pharmacist over the phone. On 7/29/21 LPA Flores conducted interviews with S1,S2,S3,S4,staff #5(S5), #6(S6). On 08/16/21, LPAs conducted interviews with resident #1 (R1),#2 (R2), #3 (R3), #4 (R4), #5(R5). (CONTINUED LIC 9099C) Unsubstantiated The investigation revealed the following: Regarding allegation: Facility staff engaged in inappropriate interactions with resident. It is alleged staff has a “Crush on resident” and has bought gifts several times and offered to buy resident a cell phone. Interviews with residents revealed the following 4 out of 5 residents stated staff have not made inappropriate comments or had inappropriate interactions with residents and 1 out of 5 residents stated that staff wants to be involved in resident's affairs. Interviews with staff revealed 5 out of 6 staff stated staff are respectful and have not observed inappropriate behavior's with residents. 1 out of 6 staff stated that facility terminated a staff member due to inappropriate behavior with a resident. Administrator stated that there have not been additional concerns regarding other staff being inappropriate with residents. Based on LPA's, interviews, and file review conducted the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation(s) are found UNSUBSTANTIATED. Regarding allegation: Facility staff is financially abusing resident. It is alleged facility billed resident stating that the bill is for medicine, however medications are covered through resident's medical insurance. Interviews with residents revealed 5 out of 5 residents stated facility has not billed residents with additional charges or requested money. Interview with staff revealed 6 out of 6 residents stated not to have heard residents state that they are being financially abuse by facility. Administrator stated some residents receive pharmacy bills as the co-payment for the medication order for residents. On 7/7/21 LPA Flores interviewed pharmacist from Specialist Medical Pharmacy, who stated that residents receive an invoice whenever medication order is not cover by medi-cal/medi-care and a fee must be charge and medication is requested by resident. Invoices are provided to the facility to be given to the residents. Based on LPA's interviews, and file review conducted the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation(s) are found UNSUBSTANTIATED. Regarding allegation: Facility staff failed to safe guard resident's personal belongings. It is alleged that in October 2020 someone stole resident's cell phone. Interviews with residents revealed 4 out of 5 residents stated to not have had any items stolen from their rooms and 1 out of 5 residents stated to have had items missing from room. Interviews with staff revealed 6 out 6 staff stated to not have heard any residents say that items have been stolen from their rooms or from a resident. Administrator stated that a resident reported to have lost cellphone in the bus around December 2020. Based on LPA's interviews, and file review conducted the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation(s) are found UNSUBSTANTIATED. Exit interview was conducted with Lydia Pabion administrator and a copy of this report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 16, 2021 · control 28-AS-20210628101748
Jul 29, 2021Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff allow residents to smoke inside the facility
Licensing Program Analyst(s) (LPA) Mary Flores conducted an unannounced complaint investigation regarding the above allegations. The investigation consisted of the following: On 6/16/21 LPA Flores interviewed administrator, conducted a tour of random rooms at the facility #223,222,209,211,206, 102,103,110,115,117,120,228,224,222, tested smoke detectors in rooms and hallways and observed designated smoking area per administrator approved by fire and police department. LPA interviewed residents #1(R1),#2(R2),#3(R3),#4(R4),#5(R5), and staff #1(S1),#2(S2),#3(S3),#4(S4),#5(S5). On 6/17/21 LPA Flores contacted South Pasadena Fire Department (SPFD). On 7/29/21 LPA Flores contacted SPFD and clarify code for smoke detectors. The investigation revealed the following: Regarding allegation: Staff allow residents to smoke inside the facility. It is alleged staff allow several residents on the second floor to smoke in their rooms. During facility's tour on 6/16/21 LPA observed resident in room #222 smoking in balcony and on 7/7/21 during a complaint investigation LPA observed resident in room #210 smoking inside the room. (CONTINUED LIC9099C) Substantiated During interviews with residents, 4 out of 5 residents stated to not observed or have bed bugs or cockroaches at the facility. 1 out of 5 residents stated to have observed a cockroach in the bedroom's bathroom. During interviews with staff, 4 out of 5 staff stated to have not observed bed bugs or cockroaches in resident's rooms or facility. 1 out of 5 staff stated that resident brought a very small cockroach to her in a plastic bag but there are no other signs of pest at the facility. Facility has a pest control contract and services facility every two weeks. Facility was last served on 6/7/21. Based on LPA's observations, interviews, and document review conducted the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation(s) are found UNSUBSTANTIATED. Regarding allegation: Facility smoke alarms are inoperable. It is alleged the second floor does not have functioning smoke detectors. During facility's tour LPA observed 12 out of 14 bedrooms had a smoke detector in the bedrooms, all smoke detectors were tested and are in working order. 2 out of 14 bedrooms did not have a smog detector in the room. LPA observed a sprinkle fire system throughout the facility and sprinklers in each room. Maintenance staff stated the smoke detector in vacant room #228 was removed for remodeling and updating. On 7/29/21 LPA Flores contacted SPFD and spoke with Firefighter Rodriguez who stated per code it is not required for facility to have smoke detectors in each room only if facility has a sprinkle system which facility does. Based on LPA's observations, and interviews, conducted the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation(s) are found UNSUBSTANTIATED. Regarding allegation: Resident's room door is obstructed. It is alleged room 211 is cluttered with random items that constantly block the resident's window and door. During facility's tour LPA observed room 211 does have many items in the floor and tables. Resident in room #211 has created about 4 feet path throughout the room to bathroom and door as well as floor room near bed and desk which allows resident usage of walker. Resident stated to be able to move around the room freely, does not want to get rid of items in his room, and has been assisted previously to dispose of some items. Administrator stated to have assisted resident in the past to get rid of some items and will continue to assist as resident brings new items. 3 out of 5 staff interview did not show concern in accessibility to the room to provide care or housekeeping. 2 out of 5 staff interview stated resident collects items but administrator assist with ensuring it does not block area. (CONTINUED LIC 9099C) Regarding allegation: Facility elevator is in disrepair. It is alleged elevator stopped working on 6/10/21 and residents are having trouble going up an down stairs. During facility's tour LPA observed elevator working properly. Administrator stated elevator was out for about an hour or less between the week of 6/6/21 to 6/11/21 once. Per administrator elevator door was not closing. Administrator called Performance Elevator Services who arrived within an hour removed an item that was preventing the door from closing, it was removed and no repairs were done by service company as there is no invoice regarding incident. Interviews with residents, 2 out of 5 residents stated elevator was out for a short time and 3 out of 5 residents do not use elevator or do not know if elevator was out. Interviews with staff, 3 out of 5 staff interview stated elevator was not working for less than an hour and 2 out of 5 staff stated to not know that elevator was not working. Resident roster shows residents in the second floor are ambulatory. Based on LPA's observations, interviews, and document review conducted the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation(s) are found UNSUBSTANTIATED. Regarding allegation: Facility does not have a resident council. It is alleged facility also does not have a resident council. During interviews with residents, 4 out of 5 residents stated facility has a resident council, 1 out of the 4 stated not to go because he does not hear the announcement in the intercom when they are announced. 1 out of 5 residents stated not to know if there is a council meeting as resident has been out in doctor's appointments and does not know if it is held or not. Interviews with staff, 5 out of 5 staff stated facility has a council meeting once a month and staff announces the meeting over intercom before it begins to allow residents to join. LPA reviewed copies of resident council meetings signing sheet and notes held on 4/16/21, 5/19/21, and 6/9/21. Based on LPA's observations, interviews, and document review conducted the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation(s) are found UNSUBSTANTIATED. Exit interview was conducted with Lydia Pabion administrator and a copy of report was provided. During interviews with 3 out 5 residents stated residents are not allowed to smoke in the facility and there is a smoking area in the back of the building. 1 out of 5 residents stated not to know if other residents were smoking outside, and 1 out of 5 residents stated residents are smoking in rooms. Interviews with staff, 3 out of 5 staff interview stated residents do not smoke in the rooms and 2 out of 4 staff stated residents smoke in balcony or residents must be reminded of no smoking in room policy. Facility's house rules state that residents should not smoke in rooms. Administrator stated house rules will be updated to reflect no smoking in facility or balconies which was previously discuss between administrator and licensee. Facility has zero residents under hospice and 2 residents in room 107 and 115 are under oxygen care per doctor's request. Based on LPA's observations, and interviews, conducted the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation(s) are found SUBSTANTIATED. California Code of Regulations Title 22, Division 6 and Chapter 8 are being cited on the attached LIC 9099D. Exit interview was conducted with Lydia Pabion administrator and a copy of this report LIC 9099D, and appeal rights was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 29, 2021 · control 28-AS-20210611130511
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87618(b)(3)(C) · Plan of correction due date: Jul 30, 2021
87618 Oxygen Administration-Gas and Liquid:(b)... the licensee shall be responsible for the following: (3) Ensuring that the use of oxygen equipment meets the following requirements: (C)Smoking shall be prohibited where oxygen is in use. This requirement is not met as evidency by: Based on observation and interviews conducted residents in room 210, and 222 were observed smoking in rooms/balcony which poses an immediate health, safety, or personal rights risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 29, 2021
Plan of correction: Administrator will ensure that residents at the facility are not smoking in bedrooms by certifying in LIC 9098 by 7/30/21 and will update and notify each resident by providing a copy of udated house rules: regarding house rules, smoking in rooms, smoking in the facility, and consequences of smoking in rooms by 8/4/21.
Jul 7, 2021Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Facility is in disrepair
Licensing Program Analyst(s) (LPA) Mary Flores conducted an unannounced complaint investigation regarding the above allegation(s). LPA Flores met with Lydia Pabion administrator and explained the reason for the visit. The investigation consisted of the following: LPA Flores conducted a tour of the facility at around 1:15pm which consisted of the common areas, kitchen, and random pick rooms #227, 210, 110, 107, 105 water temperature was tested in each room and tested between 77.6 to 114.5 degrees F which is not between the required 105 - 120 degrees F. LPA interviewed administrator and resident #1 (R1), and requested the following documents; Admission agreement, physician's report, medication sheet for June, any incident reports, face sheet for R1, resident #2(R2), #3(R3), #4(R4), #5(R5) and job description for staff #1 (S1), #2(S2), #3(S3), #4(S4), and staff and resident roster. The investigation reveled the following: Regarding allegation; Facility is in disrepair. It is alleged patio door is broken, has told several times to the facility and nothing has been done. (CONTINUED LIC 9099C) Substantiated During the facility's tour LPA observed a plastic covered holed in the dinning room's ceiling due to a leak, kitchen's refrigerator temperature at 45.2 degrees F and freezer temperature at 20.0 degrees F, second floor left hallway middle window crack on left bottom corner and right hallway middle window screen ripped on bottom left corner, room #210 water temperature read at 96.1 degrees F, and balcony screen door was off rails leaning against window, room# 105's ceiling had 3 patches large about a foot long of peel paint and sink's water drain is rusted around, and room #107 water temperature was read at 99.4 degrees F. Based on LPA's observations, conducted the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation(s) are found SUBSTANTIATED. California Code of Regulations Title 22, Division 6 and Chapter 8 are being cited on the attached LIC 9099D. Exit interview was conducted with Lydia Pabion and a copy of the report, LIC 9099D, and appeal rights was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 7, 2021 · control 28-AS-20210628101748
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87555(b)(21) · Plan of correction due date: Jul 8, 2021
87555 General Food Service Requeriments: (a) The following food service requirements shall apply: (21) Freezers... shall be maintained at a temperature of 0 degrees F ..., and refrigerators... shall maintain a maximum temperature of 40 degrees F .... This requirement is not met as evidence by: Based on LPA observation, administrator did not ensure refrigerator and freezer temperature were under the require temperature as observed freezer at 20 degrees, and refrigerator at 45.2 degrees which poses an immediate health, safety, or personal rights risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 7, 2021
Plan of correction: Administrator will certify on LIC 9098 and ensure to maintain proper refrigerator and freezer temperature. Administrator contacted refrigerator maintenance company, will have schedule refrigerator repair, and submit LIC9098 by 7/8/21.
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87303(e)(2) · Plan of correction due date: Jul 21, 2021
87303 Maintenance and Operation: (e)Water supplies and plumbing fixtures shall be maintained as follows: (2).... Hot water temperature controls shall be maintained to automatically regulate.. temperature of not less than 105 degree F (41 degree C) and not more than 120 degree F (49 degree C). This requirement is not met as evidence by: Based on observation facility failed to maintain water temperature within the required 105-120 temperature as read in rooms #105 at 77.6 degrees F, #107 at 99.4 degrees F and, #210 at 96.1 degrees F which poses a potential health, safety, or personal rights risk to person in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 7, 2021
Plan of correction: Administrator will ensure water temperature is maintain within the required range of 105-120 degrees F at all times. Administrator will certify with LIC 9098 and maintain a water temperature log that will be submitted to the department by 7/21/21.
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87303(a) · Plan of correction due date: Jul 21, 2021
87303 Maintenance and Operation: (a) The facility shall be clean, safe, sanitary and in good repair at all times. Maintenance shall include provision of maintenance services and procedures for the safety and well-being of residents, employees and visitors. This requirement is not met as evidence by: Based on observation facility did not ensure facility is in good repair as room #210 has a balcony screen door off rails, #105 ceiling is peeling in three areas, 1 middle window in 2nd floor hallway crack and 1 window screen ripped and leak in dinning room which poses a potential health, safety, or personal risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 7, 2021
Plan of correction: Administrator will schedule repairs of room #105, room #210 and windows in second floor and will submit a picture of the repairs to the department by 7/21/21.
The state marks this report as 5 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 4. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.
47 of 99 beds were occupied at the December 5, 2025 state visit — a count on that day, not an opening.
License holder
Baj Management, Inc., licensed since 2003.
The state’s totals for this licenseSince 2003, as the state’s facility page counts them
- State visits on file
- 25
- Total complaints
- 12
- Substantiated allegations
- 7
- Type A citations
- 4
- Type B citations
- 3
These are the state’s own totals for this license since 2003, per CDSS records. The state counts them apart from the documents above, and they can differ from what those documents show; the documents say what each visit found. One complaint can contain several allegations.
Compare with homes the same size
| This home | Typical | |
|---|---|---|
| Type A citations | 4 | 0 |
| Type B citations | 3 | 1 |
| Substantiated allegations | 7 | 2 |
| Total complaints | 12 | 6 |
“Typical” is the statewide median for licensed homes this size. It does not adjust for years licensed, and older licenses have had more visits and reports. The median is across the 1,354 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record. The figures compared are the state’s totals, not the documents.
What the state’s words mean
CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents stand in their place.
Frequently asked questions
A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.
Quick answers about Prospect Manor
Is Prospect Manor licensed?
The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
How many residents is Prospect Manor licensed for?
99 residents — a large community, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Has Prospect Manor been cited?
4 Type A and 3 Type B citations since 2003, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. Those records count 25 state visits over the same years.
Is Prospect Manor still open?
This license was on the CDSS roster as of November 10, 2026.
What does Prospect Manor cost?
$5,500 a month to start — listed by the home on its own website · October 5, 2026.
The home lists this starting rate on its own website for assisted living, semi-private, seen October 5, 2026.
Among 132 other homes of a similar licensed size across Los Angeles County that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $3,288 to $5,973 a month, and the middle figure is $4,498 (n = 132 other homes publishing a starting rate).
Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date between September and October 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.
A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.
The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.
A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.
Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out. What Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver covers in a care home.
Does Prospect Manor take Medi-Cal?
On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home appears on the DHCS participation list, October 1, 2026. Confirm eligibility and current participation with the program. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
Who holds the license?
The license is held by Baj Management, Inc., per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Is there a hospital nearby?
Huntington Hospital is 1.2 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.
Can Prospect Manor keep a resident on hospice?
Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 4 residents, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Prospect Manor license and inspection record
- Name on the license: “PROSPECT MANOR”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
- License #197603952. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- Licensed for 99 residents — a large community, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- Licensed to Baj Management, Inc., per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- First licensed in 2003, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- 25 state inspection visits since 2003, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- 4 Type A and 3 Type B citations on file since 2003, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. The same records count 25 state visits in that period.
- 12 complaints and 7 substantiated allegations on file since 2003, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
- The most recent state visit on file is October 5, 2026, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗
Nearby
Other homes nearby
Licensed homes near this one in Los Angeles County, most information on file first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.
- Map
Starting rate
$8,100 a month to start
Listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026On the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Starting rate
$6,825 a month to start
Listed by the home on its own website · October 27, 2026On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$3,900 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $3,050–$5,000On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$5,500 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $4,500–$6,800On the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Map
Starting rate
$8,000 a month to start
Listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$6,400 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $5,050–$8,400On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
Street maps © Protomaps · © OpenStreetMap
Explore Los Angeles County