Small home · Licensed for 4 · Los Angeles
Summer House at Ladera Heights
6108 Damask Avenue, Los Angeles, CA 90056Licensed since 2012
Overview
No openings reported
- Approved by the state: Wheelchair · Hospice · BedriddenState licensing record · October 26, 2026
- Licensed for 4: a small care homeThe state license record
Ask this home
Free for families. A home gets your number only if you say yes.
Care and support
- Wheelchairup to 4 residents
- Hospiceup to 2 residents
- Bedridden
Not on file: dementia approval.
Approved by the state · State licensing record · October 26, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.
Read the state’s own wording
LICENSEE PREFERS TO SERVE CLIENTS AGES 60 AND ABOVE. FACILITY IS APPROVED FOR FOUR (4) NON-AMBULATORY CLIENTS. ONE (1) BEDRIDDEN IN ROOM# 2 ONLY. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR TWO(2) APPROVED. FACILITY SERVES RESIDENTS WITH DEMENTIA.
935 - ELDERLY
CDSS record, verbatim · October 26, 2026
As needs change
Staying through hospice
Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 2 — care may continue at the end of life
State licensing record · October 26, 2026
We’ll ask for you. Not on file for Summer House at Ladera Heights: two-person transfers or a lift, who is awake overnight, help with medicines and care if memory loss develops. When we check availability, we ask about these too.
Check availabilityWhat it costs here
Covelight estimate
$5,700a month to start
Likely $4,650–$7,000
From 24 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file
Monthly cost breakdownWith a shared room and basic help · room, care and fees$5,700likely a month
Memory care is not priced here: a dementia-care designation is not on file for this home. Ask the home.
Starting monthly rate$5,700likely $4,650–$7,000
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 24 small homes and similar homes within 9 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600
Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (44 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).
One-time move-in fee$2,500one time · likely $0–$4,000
Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,500 (133 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.
- Likely monthly totalLikely $4,650–$7,150
- $5,700
- First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $5,450–$10,300
- $8,200
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
- MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
- Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
- Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated October 1, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
- SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
- VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
- Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
Rates at nearby homes24 nearby homes publish starting rates of $3,500 to $9,000
24 homes like this within 9 miles publish starting rates mostly between $4,500–$8,450.
- Ladera Sunrise Care HomeLos Angeles · 0.4 mi · Small home$7,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Ladera VistaLos Angeles · 1.0 mi · Small home$9,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
- Harvard Hope HouseLos Angeles · 3.5 mi · Small home$4,500Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Bentley ManorLos Angeles · 4.5 mi · Mid-size home$4,000Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Miko InnLos Angeles · 4.6 mi · Small home$8,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living · seen September 9, 2026
- Coastal HouseLos Angeles · 5.7 mi · Small home$9,000Listed on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026
- Ayres Residential Care Home-Century CityLos Angeles · 5.7 mi · Small home$7,000Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Simla Villas, Redondo BeachRedondo Beach · 7.2 mi · Small home$6,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
- Josephines Garden VillaManhattan Beach · 7.2 mi · Small home$7,800Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
- Villa ChristaTorrance · 7.5 mi · Small home$4,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Aviation Guest HomeManhattan Beach · 7.5 mi · Small home$5,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Atkinson Care HomeTorrance · 7.8 mi · Small home$5,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Morningside TerraceTorrance · 7.9 mi · Small home$5,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Americare Assisted LivingRedondo Beach · 7.9 mi · Small home$6,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
- Golden Tiara VillaTorrance · 7.9 mi · Small home$4,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Hearts of Paradise HomeTorrance · 8.0 mi · Small home$5,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Royal Palms VillaTorrance · 8.0 mi · Small home$6,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
- Daniella's HomeTorrance · 8.2 mi · Small home$4,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Summerland ManorTorrance · 8.2 mi · Small home$3,500Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Redondo Beach Elderly HomeRedondo Beach · 8.3 mi · Mid-size home$5,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Helping Hands With CareCompton · 8.6 mi · Small home$6,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Active Board + CareTorrance · 8.8 mi · Small home$5,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- TLC Guest Home 1Torrance · 8.8 mi · Small home$5,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Asahi Residential CareTorrance · 8.9 mi · Small home$5,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 24 small homes and similar homes within 9 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
- Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
- Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
- Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
- Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
- We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
- It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
- The care level
Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.
- What is billed separately
Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.
- Move-in costs
A one-time move-in fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.
- Increases
California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.
An estimate for planning, not a quote. A home sets the price after hearing about the care needed.
Daily life
Daily life here is not on file yet. Most small homes haven’t published it, and that says nothing about the home.
The best way to see it is a visit.
Request a tourWhere it is
6108 Damask Avenue, Los Angeles, CA 90056Address from the public record · October 26, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.
Opening the neighborhood map…
- Kindred Hospital - Los AngelesHospital · General acute care, on the state’s list1 mi
Straight-line distances; check the drive or the walk. Hospital: the nearest general acute care hospital on the state’s list (CDPH, September 16, 2026).
Open directionsThe state record
California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.
CDSS public record, read October 26, 2026 · License #197608232 · See the state’s own record
The last 36 months — 7 of 16 documents
Complaint outcomes in these 36 months, in the state’s words: 3 “Unsubstantiated”.
20261 state visit · 1 document
Feb 25, 2026Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sparkle Day conducted an unannounced visit to the above facility. The purpose of today’s visit was to conduct the one-year inspection. LPA met with Michael Yniesta ,Caregiver and the purpose of the visit was discussed. LPA spoke with Administrator Mark Loo via phone. The facility is licensed to serve four (4) non- ambulatory residents age 60 and over . The facility has an approved hospice waiver for (2) residents and 1 bedridden in room #2 Only.. None of the residents are receiving home health. One (1) resident is receiving hospice care services. The facility does not handle any of the residents’ money. This home is a single story home consisting of: (3) resident bedrooms, (2) Full bathroom,living room, dining room, kitchen, staff bedroom and staff bathroom, laundry area, garage and an outdoor shaded patio area. LPA toured the Resident bedrooms had the required furniture, bed linens and closet/drawer space to accommodate each resident comfortably. Resident bathrooms were checked. Toilets and water faucets worked properly, shower was free of mold/mildew and a non-skid mat was in place, water temperature measured between 118.1F. Resident bath towels, toiletries and personal hygiene supplies were adequately stocked. Common areas were clean and clear of hazards; doorways were free of obstructions. Kitchen was checked and observed to be within Title 22 regulations. Perishable and non-perishable food supply was checked. All cleaning solutions, hazardous items, and medications were securely locked and inaccessible to residents. Smoke detectors were working properly and fire extinguisher was fully charged. Carbon monoxide detector was operational. First Aid kit was available. Outside grounds were toured and no bodies of water were observed. Walkways around the home were clear of hazards. There are no security bars or weapons on the premises. According to the California Code of Regulations (Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8), LPA observed the following deficiencies and issued a citation. (See 809-D) Exit interview conducted with Michael Yniesta,Caregiver. A copy of this report was provided at time of visit.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 25, 2026
20254 state visits · 4 documents
Dec 29, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff yelled at the resident. Staff made inappropriate comments towards the resident.
On December 29, 2025, at 9:40 a.m., Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Pamela Bunker conducted an initial visit to gather information regarding the above allegations. LPA met with Marilyn Nery, caregiver, and spoke to Mark Loo, Licensee/Administrator, and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA was granted entry to the facility. The investigation consisted of the following: On December 29, 2025, the following documents were reviewed and/or obtained as part of the investigation: Personnel Report (dated 12/29/2025), Resident Roster (dated 12/29/2025), Admission Agreement (dated 10/28/2025) Identification and Emergency Information (dated 11/25/2025), Physician’s Report (dated 10/23/2025), Medical Assessment (dated 10/14/2025), Medication Administration Records (MARs) (dated 10/28/2025-12/29/2025), Appraisal & Needs and Services Plan (dated 10/28/2025), Functional Capability Assessment (dated 10/28/2025 ), Preplacement Appraisal Information (dated 10/14/2025), Personal Rights (dated 10/28/2025), Consent Forms (dated 10/28/2025 ), and In-Service Training (dated 03/17/2025). See continued LIC9099-C page 2 Unsubstantiated Continued LIC9099-C page 2. On 12/29/2025, between 10:00 a.m. and 3:30 p.m., LPA Pamela Bunker conducted interviews with staff members #1–#3 (S1–S3) and residents #2–#4 (R2–R4). Resident #1 (R1) was interviewed by telephone. The investigation revealed the following. Allegation: Staff yelled at the resident. The LPA interviewed staff members #1–3 (S1–S3). All three staff members (3 out of 3) consistently stated that staff do not yell at residents and that Resident #1 (R1) has never been yelled at by anyone in the facility. 3 out of 3 staff members reported that all residents are treated with dignity and respect. They also stated that residents have personal relationships with staff and that the facility maintains a zero‑tolerance policy regarding inappropriate conduct. 3 out of 3 staff members indicated that each resident is provided with a safe, healthful environment and comfortable accommodations. All three staff members confirmed they have never witnessed any staff member yelling at a resident. S1–S3 denied the allegation. Residents #1–#4 (R1–R4) stated that staff do not yell at residents and that staff provide adequate care and supervision. 4 out of 4 residents reported that staff are always available to assist and consistently check on residents. Resident #1 (R1) stated that the staff did not yell at them, and 3 out of 4 residents confirmed they had not witnessed any staff member yelling at R1. R1–R4 reported that their daily needs are being met and that they are happy living at the facility, expressing no problems or concerns. All four residents denied the allegation. Allegation: Staff made inappropriate comments towards the resident. The LPA interviewed staff members #1–3 (S1–S3). All three staff members (3 out of 3) stated that no inappropriate comments were made toward the resident. S1–S3 reported that all residents are treated with dignity and respect and that the facility maintains a zero-tolerance policy for inappropriate conduct. They further stated that residents are free from corporal or unusual punishment and are provided with a safe, healthful environment and comfortable accommodations. All three staff members also stated that the staff did not attempt to send Resident #1 (R1) to a medical appointment alone. See continued LIC812-C page 2. Continued LIC812-C page 3. S1–S3 clarified that S1 never made the comment, “Why don’t you have relatives to help you?” S1 explained that R1 had been receiving medical transportation through Kaiser Permanente, but once R1’s transportation credits were exhausted, the facility assisted in arranging alternative transportation options. S1–S3 denied the allegation and stated they have never witnessed any staff member making inappropriate comments toward any resident. Residents #2–#4 (R2–R4) stated that staff do not make inappropriate comments toward R1. Resident #1 (R1) stated that staff have never made any inappropriate comments toward them. 4 out of 4 residents reported that they have never witnessed staff speaking inappropriately to any resident. R1–R4 also stated that they are happy living at the facility and have no problems or concerns. All four residents denied the allegation. LPA Bunker reviewed Resident #1’s (R1) file, including the Admission Agreement dated October 28, 2025, which was signed and confirmed that the facility does not provide transportation to the resident. LPA Bunker also reviewed R1’s medical records from Kaiser Permanente West Los Angeles Medical Center dated November 23, 2025, and December 4, 2025, which showed that medical care and transportation services were being provided. Based on interviews, available evidence, observation, information received, and records reviewed there was not enough sufficient evidence to support the allegation. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is deemed unsubstantiated. A copy of the Complaint Investigation Report LIC9099 and LIC9099-C was provided to the . No deficiencies were cited. An exit interview was conducted.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 29, 2025 · control 11-AS-20251223101427
Sep 18, 2025Facility evaluation reportCase Management - DeficienciesDeficiency page: Type A
Type of visit: Case Management - Deficiencies
Licensing Program Analyst (Ernand Dabuet) made an unannounced visit to the facility and was greeted by caregiver (Marilyn Nery). The Administrator (Mark Loo) was contacted by phone and explained the purpose of this visit is to deliver a generated Case Management – Deficiencies, evaluation report in conjunction with Complaint Control #11-AS-20191113101336 due to the following observations: This investigation revealed that Resident #1 was restrained to the bedrails utilizing pieces of cloth sheets and shirts. The cloth restraints were placed around the resident’s wrists – while the resident was wearing gloves. Staff #1 admitted the purpose of the restraints were to prevent Resident #1 from removing the Foley catheter and scratching its wounds; as the resident would get agitated. Staff #1 expressed the necessity to occasionally restrain Resident #1 in different positions in order to prevent the resident from placing pressure on its wounds. On several occasions, Witness #1 observed Resident #1 tied to the bed rails in this same manner and would instruct Staff #1 to immediately remove the restraints. It seemed to be a reoccurring event requiring Witness #1 to repeatedly order Staff #1 to remove these restraints from Resident #1. Based on the evidence gathered and interviews conducted, and records reviewed, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met; therefore, the allegation PERSONAL RIGHTS: Resident was restrained by the hands to the bedrails is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. According to the California Code of Regulations (Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8), the following deficiency was observed and a citation issued (ref. LIC 9099D). An exit interview was conducted with (Mark Loo), and copy of the Complaint Report and Appeal Rights were provided to caregiver (Marilyn Nery).the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 18, 2025
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87468.1(a)(3) · Plan of correction due date: Oct 2, 2025
87468.1(a)(3) Personal Rights of Residents in All Facilities: To be free from punishment, humiliation, intimidation, abuse, or other actions of a punitive nature; such as, withholding residents money or interfering with daily-living functions; such as, eating, sleeping, or elimination. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Staff #1 admitted the purpose of the restraints and expressed the necessity to occasionally restrain Resident #1 in different positions. This violation poses an immediate health and safety risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 18, 2025
Plan of correction: The administrator shall read Title 22, Section 87468.1(a)(3) “Personal Rights of Residents in All Facilities” and send a written statement to CCLD by the POC date that Administrator will ensure that a resident in the facility will be free from punishment and abuse or other actions of a punitive nature. The plan is due to CCLD/El Segundo ASC Office by POC date of 09/19/25.
Sep 10, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Licensee is restricting resident's vistations.
On 09/10/2025 At 8:15 AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Bernadette Allen conducted an unannounced visit to conduct a complaint investigation and deliver the findings for the alleged allegation. LPA Allen was met by Marilyn Nery-Support Staff. LPA Allen introduced herself and explained the purpose of the visit and was allowed entry into the facility. The investigation consisted of the following: At 8:30 AM LPA Allen requested and obtained copies of the following documents: Admission Agreement, Needs/Service plan, ID/Emergency Information, Physicians Report, and Pre-placement Appraisal Information for Resident 1 (R1), visitor sign in sheet from 7/3/2025-9/10/2025 and reviewed the Staff/Client Roster which needs to be updated as of 9/10/2025. Eden Hospice Care Inc. Notice of hospice patient dated 8/26/2025. LPA interviewed Staff 1-2 (S1-S2), attempted to interview Resident 1-2 (R1-R2), LPA interviewed Resident 3-4 (R3-R4), and Witness 1 (W1). Continued Unsubstantiated Investigation revealed the following: Allegation: Licensee is restricting resident's visitations. On 9/10/2025, LPA interviewed Staff 1 and Staff 2 (S1 - S2). Both staff members confirmed that Resident 1 (R1) was allowed to have visitors on 8/30/2025 and 9/2/2025. S1 stated that on both 8/30/2025 and 9/2/2025, there was a delay in responding to the front door due to assisting another resident. S1 further stated that on 8/30/2025, the visitor waited approximately 15 minutes before being verbally informed of R1’s bedroom location, where the visit subsequently took place. S2 stated that a call was made to them regarding the visitor; however, the visitor had already been allowed entry into the home prior to the call and was permitted to visit R1. Both S1 and S2 confirmed that R1 was also allowed to have visitors on 9/2/2025. The interviews revealed that although there was a delay in answering the door, R1 was not restricted from having visitors. LPA reviewed the facility’s sign-in sheet and found no documentation indicating that R1 had visitors. However, staff interviews confirmed that R1 was allowed visitors and that entry into the facility was granted. At 10:25 AM, LPA attempted to interview Residents 1 and 2 (R1 - R2). However, R1 had recently passed away, and R2 was unavailable due to an appointment. Residents 3 and 4 (R3 - R4) both stated they have never been denied or restricted from having visitors. Interview with Witness 1 (W1) confirmed that R1 was able to have visitors on both 8/30/2025 and 9/2/2025. Based on the evidence gathered during the investigation, the above allegation is found to be Unsubstantiated meaning that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur. An exit interview was conducted, during which this report was discussed and provided to Marilyn Nery at the conclusion of the visit, along with appeal rights.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 10, 2025 · control 11-AS-20250902124215
Mar 14, 2025Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
On 03/14/2025 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Wendy Gibbs, conducted an unannounced annual visit using the CARE Inspection tool. LPA met with Caregiver, Marilyn Nery, and the purpose of today’s visit was explained. The facility is licensed to serve four (4) non-ambulatory residents, one (1) of which may be bedridden in room two (2) with an approved hospice waiver for two (2) residents. Currently there are four (4) residents residing in the facility. Physical Plant/Structure- The facility is a single-story home in a residential neighborhood. The facility consists of three (3) bedrooms, one (1) staff room, two (2) resident bathroom, one (1) staff/visitor bathroom, living room area, dining area, kitchen with a laundry area. All walkways outside the facility were observed clean, clear, and free of obstructions, hazards, and debris. LPA did not observe any bodies of water on the premises. Bedrooms- LPA inspected all resident bedrooms and observed they had the required furniture. All rooms had bed(s), dresser, nightstand, storage space for resident’s personal belongings, chair, and ample lighting. LPA observed all beds had the required linens including mattress cover, fitted sheets, blanket, comforter, and pillows. LPA observed an ample supply of linens stored in resident’s rooms. Bathrooms- LPA inspected all bathrooms in the facility and observed them to be operational and within Title 22 regulations. LPA observed shower chairs and non-skid mats in the shower. The safety handrails are secured. LPA observed an ample supply of hygiene products for residents secured and inaccessible to residents. The department observed an ample supply of towels, hand towels, and wash clothes in good repair. The water temperature measured 110-degrees, 110.9-degrees and 112.6-degrees Fahrenheit. Kitchen LPA inspected the kitchen and found it to be clean and sanitary. LPA observed all appliances were operable and in good repair. LPA observed an ample supply of cookware, dishware, and cutleries. LPA observed a 3-day supply of perishable foods and a 7-day supply of non-perishable foods properly stored, packaged, and labeled. LPA observed cleaning supplies secured in a locked cabinet. LPA observed sharps and knives secured in a locked drawer in the kitchen. The water temperature measured 112.6-degree Fahrenheit. Common Areas LPA observed in the living room a large couch and four (4) chairs to accommodate all residents. LPA observed a fireplace screened and inaccessible to residents. The dining room has a large table with chairs to accommodate residents. LPA observe games and activities in resident’s rooms. LPA observed all walkways and hallways to be clean, clear, and free of obstructions and hazards. All rooms were observed with ample lighting. The facility was maintained at a comfortable temperature. Files LPA reviewed four (4) resident files and found they did not contain all the required documents. The department reviewed the Administrators and two (2) staff files and found they contained most of the required documents and certification. LPA did not observe training logs for 2024 or 2025. During the visit, LPA informed the Administrator licensing fees are due this month (March 2025) and provided the PIN. Medication LPA observed all Centrally Stored Medications secured in a locked closet in the hall. All medications were observed in their original packaging. LPA reviewed the medication and Medication Administration Record (MAR) for four (4) residents. LPA observed four (4) out of four (4) resident’s MARs and medication are consistent with properly documented records. Infection Control During the visit, LPA observed the facility infection control practices. LPA observed a sanitizing station and visitor log upon entry. LPA observed it has hand sanitizer, masks, gloves, and a thermometer available. LPA observed the facility has a 30-day supply of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE). All mandated infection control signs were posted throughout the facility. Safety LPA observed smoke detectors and carbon monoxide were operable. LPA observed a fully charged fire extinguisher with a receipt from 2024. The last emergency drill was conducted on 09/27/24. The facility has a working telephone. LPA was emailed a copy of the liability insurance. LPA inspected the First Aid Kit and found it contained the required items and a current manual. There are no firearms or ammunition stored on the premises. Deficiencies are cited on the LIC809-D page. An exit interview was conducted with Caregiver, Marilyn Nary, and a copy of this report and the Appeals Rights were provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 14, 2025
20242 state visits · 2 documents
Nov 20, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff did not ensure that resident was able to return to the facility after hospitalization.
On 11/20/24, the department conducted an unannounced complaint visit to the facility listed above. The department met with Caregiver, Marilyn Nery, and the purpose of today's visit was explained. During today’s visit the department toured the facility, interviewed Staff S1-S3, interviewed Residents R1-R3, and received documents pertinent to the investigation. The following documents were received and reviewed Staff Roster, Resident Roster, Physician’s Report, Preplacement Appraisal Information, Identification and Emergency Information, and Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Report Information. The investigation revealed the following: Unsubstantiated Allegation: Staff did not ensure resident was able to return to the facility after hospitalization. The complaint allegation alleges that after a resident was transferred to the Emergency Department, they attempted to contact the facility staff multiple times, and later that day had the resident transferred back to the facility and nobody answered the door resulting in the resident being transferred back to the hospital. During the facility tour, the department observed resident bedrooms are in the back of the facility. While at the facility, the department called the facility landline telephone, which rang, and had staff not answer it so the answering voicemail would pick up. Upon entry to the facility the department observed there is a ring camera at the entrance of the facility. During an interview with the Administrator (S1), was asked if on the day of the incident if there were any notifications that there was someone at the door, they stated they did not receive any notifications on the evening of 11/10/2024. During record review, the department observed S2 was working the night shift on 11/10/24. During an interview with Staff S2, was asked if they were at the facility at 8PM on 11/10/24, S2 stated they were at the facility on that night and that at 8PM they are usually assisting residents with getting ready for bed and helping them into bed. Additionally, S2 stated they did not hear any knocking, or the doorbell ringing, or the telephone ringing. During interviews with staff S1-S3, were asked if there was a time when a resident returned from the hospital and staff were not available to receive a resident back, three (3) out of three (3) stated there is always staff at the facility and residents are always able to return to the facility. Additionally, Staff S1-S3 were asked if they heard anything from the hospital on 11/10/24, three (3) out of three (3) stated they had not heard or got any updates from the hospital, and that usually the nurse calls and gives update. Additionally, during an interview with Staff S1, was asked how they found out R1 was ready to be transferred back to the facility, S1 stated they were informed when a Los Angeles Sherriff’s contacted the other Administrator and informed them of an Elder Abuse Report regarding R1. During interview with residents R1-R3, were asked if there was a time they left the facility and were unable to return to the facility or staff did not open the door, three (3) out of three (3) stated no, they have not experienced that. Additionally, during interviews with Resident R2 and R3 were asked if on the night on 11/10/24 if they heard the telephone keep ringing or somebody knocking on the door, or ringing the door bell, two (2) out of two (2) stated they did not hear anything. During the course of the investigation, LPA was unable to find evidence to support the allegation. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is no preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation(s) did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated. A technical violation was issued, please see attached LIC9102. An exit interview was conducted with Caregiver, Marilyn Nery, and a copy of this report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 20, 2024 · control 11-AS-20241114103411
Mar 15, 2024Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
On 03/15/24 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Villegas conducted an unannounced annual required visit using the CARE Inspection Tool. LPA met with Caregiver Crisostono Gaytos as the purpose of the visit was explained. The facility is licensed to serve clients with dementia ages 60 and above. Facility is approved for four (4), non-ambulatory clients, one (1) bedridden in room #2 only, hospice waiver for two (2). Current facility census is 5, facility fees are current. The facility is a single-story structure located in a residential neighborhood. The facility consists of the following: three (3) resident's rooms, one (1) staff room, three (3) bathrooms of which one (1) is for staff and visitors only, living room area, dining area, kitchen with a laundry area. Client bedrooms were checked, mattresses and box springs were in good condition, adequate lighting, plenty of dresser and closet space was observed. Bathroom toilets and water faucets worked properly, shower was free of mold/mildew, and there are sufficient toiletries accessible to clients. The water temperature properly measured between 105-120 F.. A supply of perishable and non-perishable food was observed, toxins and knifes were stored and inaccessible to clients, no weapons nor bodies of water on the premises, exits and walkways are free of debris/hazards. LPA conducted a records review of two(2) staff records, three (3) client records, and three (3) medication administration records, medications were centrally stored and properly locked. First aid kit was checked and fully stocked. The last fire was conducted on 03/05/20, four (4) fire extinguisher fully charged, carbon monoxide and smoke detectors are interconnected and operational. citations documented on 809D page. Exit interview conducted with Caregiver Crisostono Gaytos, appeal rights explained and a copy of this report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 15, 2024
Earlier years2021 to 2023 · 9 documents
20235 state visits · 5 documents
Nov 7, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff are not keeping medications in a safe and locked location. Staff are not keeping dangerous items in a safe and locked location.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Pamela Bunker conducted an unannounced complaint visit on Tuesday, November 07, 2023. Upon arrival at the facility. LPA Bunker called the facility via telephone and conducted a Risk Assessment. Based on the assessment, the facility is cleared of COVID-19 infection. LPA Bunker met with staff Chris Gaytos and Mayet Neri. LPA spoke to Licensee Mark Loo via telephone. LPA Bunker explained the purpose of today's visit. The investigation consisted of the following: Interviews conducted with staff 1-3 (S1-S3), residents 1-3 (R1-R3), and witness 1 (W1) LPA Bunker was unable to interview resident 4 (R4), R4 was sleeping and is hard of hearing. LPA Bunker asked questions relevant to the nature of the complaint. Staff Mayet and LPA Bunker toured the entire facility to observe and identify any signs of neglect, abuse, or other immediate health and safety threats. We did not observe any signs of neglect or abuse during today's visits. LPA Bunker reviewed residents' medication records in the facility-locked cabinet in the hallway. LPA observed resident knives in a locked cabinet in the kitchen inaccessible to residents. LPA Bunker requested copies of supporting documents. See continued LIC9099-C page 2 Unsubstantiated See continued LIC9099-C page 2 Allegation #1: Staff are not keeping medications in a safe and locked location. LPA Bunker conducted interviews with staff 1-3 (S1-S3), residents 1-3 (R1-R3), and witness 1 (W1) regarding the allegation that, on October 31, 2023, resident medications were stored in a locked cabinet in the hallway, and medication is consistently secured. S1-S3, R1-R3, and W1 unanimously affirmed that staff diligently safeguard residents' medications at all times, maintaining them in a secure, locked place. In summary, all parties interviewed denied the allegation. Allegation #2: Staff are not keeping dangerous items in a safe and locked location. LPA Bunker interviewed staff 1-3 (S1-S3), residents 1-3 (R1-R3), and witness 1 (W1) concerning the alleged allegation of dangerous items not being stored in a secure, locked location. According to their statements, knives in the facility are stored in a locked cabinet in the kitchen, ensuring that they are inaccessible to residents in care. S1-S3, R1-R3, and W1 consistently denied the allegation. The investigation consisted of the following: Interviews with staff 1-3 (S1-S3), residents 1-3 (R1-R3), and W1, who all attested that medications are consistently stored in a safe, locked location. Staff confirmed that they unlocked the medication cabinet to dispense medication to residents, promptly locking it afterward. Medication is never left unattended in the kitchen at eye level. S1-S3 emphasized that medications are appropriately labeled and maintained in compliance with regulations. Medications are securely locked and inaccessible to residents. The same rigorous safety measures apply to dangerous items, which are kept in a locked kitchen cabinet, with kitchen knives only taken out for cooking and food preparation. S1-S3, R1-R3, and W1 affirmed that residents do not have access to the kitchen area, ensuring their safety. Staff takes great care to meet residents' needs, and S1-S3 emphasized their training and competence in delivering the necessary services. They are committed to preventing residents from harm, injury, and danger. R1-R3 expressed their satisfaction with the staff's kindness and quality of care, stating they are content living at the facility. S1-S3, R1-R3, and W1 collectively denied the allegations. See continued LIC9099-C page 3 See continued LIC9099-C page 3 Based on interviews, available evidence, observation, information received, and records reviewed there was not enough sufficient evidence to support the allegation. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is deemed unsubstantiated. A copy of the Complaint Investigation Report LIC9099 and LIC9099-Cs provided to the facility staff. There were no deficiencies cited. An exit interview was conducted.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 7, 2023 · control 11-AS-20231102124719
The state marks this report as 7 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 3. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.
Jul 27, 2023Facility evaluation reportPOCReport on file
Type of visit: POC
On 7/27/23, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Felisa Shirley arrived to follow-up on deficiencies issued during visit on 7/21/23. LPA was met by staff Chris Gaytos, and the purpose of today’s visit was explained. The following deficiencies were observed and cited for on 7/21/23: -At 09:55 am LPA took hot water temperate in facility kitchen and noted that it was 120.8 F. -At 09:57 am LPA observed that cabinet in kitchen which held medication was not locked. -At 10:06 am LPA observed a bottle of Lysol under bathroom sink, cabinet did not have a lock. -At 10:06 am LPA observed Lysol and Clorox wipes located on rack above toilet in bathroom accessible to residents. During today’s visit, LPA observed the following: -at 11:15 am LPA observed that the water measured at 124.3. -at 11:17 am LPA observed that the locks on medication cabinet where on the cabinet, but not engaged. LPA observed that the bottle of Lysol was removed from cabinet under the bathroom sink. LPA also observed that the bottle of Lysol and Clorox wipes were removed from the rack above the toilet in the bathroom. A Plan of Correction letter is being issued. As these citations have not been cleared, civil penalties will be issued for failure to correct. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report, civil penalties and appeal rights were provided to caregiver Chris Gaytos.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 27, 2023
Jul 21, 2023Facility evaluation reportCase Management - OtherDeficiency pages: Type A, Type B
Type of visit: Case Management - Other
On 7/21/2023 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Felisa Shirley conducted a Case Management visit to follow up on the Annual processed on prior visits. LPA was greeted by Chris Gaytos, Staff. LPA spoke with Chris and explained the purpose of the visit was to gather information to complete Annuals processed on 3/28/23 and 5/19/23. The census for today is 4. The following documents were requested and received during the visit: · Copy of Liability Insurance · Updated LIC 500 The following deficiencies were observed during the visit: -At 09:55 am LPA took hot water temperate in facility kitchen and noted that it was 120.8 F. -At 09:57 am LPA observed that cabinet in kitchen which held medication was not locked. -At 10:03 am LPA observed that bed in first bedroom did not have proper layers. -At 10:05 am LPA observed that R1 had postural supports with no prescription -At 10:06 am LPA observed a bottle of Lysol under bathroom sink, cabinet did not have a lock -At 10:06 am LPA observed Lysol and Clorox wipes located on rack above toilet in bathroom accessible to residents. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report and appeal rights were provided to caregiver Chris Gaytos.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 21, 2023
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87303(e)(2) · Plan of correction due date: Jul 22, 2023
Maintenance and Operation Faucets used by the staff in the kitchen shall deliver hot water. Hot water temperature controls shall be maintained to automatically regulate the temperture of hot water used to attain a temperature of not less than 105 degrees F and not more than 120 degree F. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on observation, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above. LPA found water temperature in kitchen to be 120.8, which poses an immediate health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 21, 2023
Plan of correction: Licensee will monitor water over next 24 hours and submit proof that water is between 105 F and 120 F bia fax to CCLD.
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR87309(a)(1) · Plan of correction due date: Jul 22, 2023
(a) Disinfectants, cleaning solutions, poisons, firearms and other items which coluld pose a danger if readily available to clients shall be stored where inaccessible to clients. (1)Storage areas for poisons, and firearms and other dangerous weapons shall be locked. This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on observation the licensee did not comply with the section cited above by having toxins accessible to clients which poses an immediate health and safety risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 21, 2023
Plan of correction: Licensee will put a lock on cabinet door located under the bathroom sink and put all toxins in locked cabinet.
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87465(h)(2) · Plan of correction due date: Jul 22, 2023
Centrally stored medicines shall be kept in a safe and locked place. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on observation, the licensee did not ensure safety by not locking up medications making them inaccessible to residents which could pose as an immediate health and safety risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 21, 2023
Plan of correction: Licensee shall lock at medications away and make inaccessible to residents.
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR87307(3)(c) · Plan of correction due date: Aug 4, 2023
(3)Equipment and supplies necessary for personal care and maintenance of a adequate hygience practice shall be readily available to each resident. (c)clean linen, including blankets, bedspreads, top bed sheets, bottom bed sheets, pillow cases, mattress pads This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on observation, the licensee did not ensure that residents were provided proper linens for bedding, which could pose as an immediate health and safety risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 21, 2023
Plan of correction: Licensee shall provide proper linens for residents beds.
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: HSC 87608(a)(3) · Plan of correction due date: Aug 4, 2023
(a) Based on the individual's preadmission appraisal, Postural supports may be used under the following conditions.(3) A written order from a physician indicating the need for the postural support shall be maintained in the resident’s record. The licensing agency shall be authorized to require other additional documentation if needed to verify the order. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on observation and file review, the licensee did not ensure safety by having postural supports on residents bed, which could pose as an immediate health and safety risk to persons in carethe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 21, 2023
Plan of correction: Licensee shall remove hospice rails and provide a copy once removed to CCLD via fax.
May 19, 2023Facility evaluation reportCase Management - Annual ContinuationReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Annual Continuation
On 05/19/23 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Felisa Shirley returned to facility to continue unannounced annual required visit with using the new CARE Inspection Tool. LPA met with caregiver Chris Gaytos and explained the purpose of today’s visit. The facility is licensed to operate for four (4) elderly residents ages 60 and above. The facility is approved for four (4) non ambulatory of which one (1) can be bedridden and two (2) can be under hospice care. LPA Shirley continued the inspection tour. The facility is a single-story structure located in a residential neighborhood. The facility consists of the following: three (3) resident's rooms, a staff room, three (3) bathrooms of which one (1) is designated for staff and visitors only, a living room area, a dining area, kitchen and a converted detached room which is used for staff. The washer and dryer are located next to the kitchen. LPA retest the water temperatures. Water delivered at 131.5 F. Advisory Notes – Four (4) Technical Assistance were issued, please see LIC9102-AN. Two (2) deficiencies were cited during this inspection visit. See the Case Management 809 D pages. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report was provided to caregiver Chris Gaytos.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 19, 2023
Mar 28, 2023Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
On 03/28/2023, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Felisa Shirley and Licensing Program Manager (LPM) Stephanie Cifuentes conducted an unannounced annual required visit with using the new CARE Inspection Tool. LPA met with caregiver Chris Gaytos and explained the purpose of today’s visit. The facility is licensed to operate for four (4) elderly residents ages 60 and above. The facility is approved for four (4) non ambulatory of which one (1) can be bedridden and two (2) can be under hospice care. The facility is a single-story structure located in a residential neighborhood. The facility consists of the following: three (3) resident's rooms, a staff room, three (3) bathrooms of which one (1) is designated for staff and visitors only, a living room area, a dining area, kitchen and a converted detached room which is used for staff. The washer and dryer are located next to the kitchen. The kitchen was inspected and there is sufficient perishable and non-perishable food available maintained properly. There are three (3) fire extinguishers fully charged in the kitchen and the dining room. Resident bathrooms were checked. Toilets and water faucets were operable, grab bars were secure, shower was free of mold/mildew. The following deficiencies were observed during the visit: -At 1:23pm LPA took hot water temperate in facility bathroom and noted that it was 150.3F -At 1:20pm LPA observed that drawers in kitchen which held knives and toxins were not locked. -At 1:20pm LPA observed that hall closet was unlocked and had a pair of scissors on one of the shelves. -At 1:24pm LPA observed that facility bathroom did not have non-slip mat. -At 1:20PM LPA observed that oven in facility kitchen was not operational. Due to time constraints, annual inspection could not be completed at this time. LPA will return at a later date for an annual continuation. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report and appeal rights were provided to caregiver Chris Gaytos.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 28, 2023
20221 state visit · 2 documents
Mar 15, 2022Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
On 03/15/2022, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Don Senaha conducted an unannounced annual required visit with a primary focus on Infection Control measures using the new CARE Inspection Tool. LPA met with caregiver Chris Gaytos and explained the purpose of today’s visit. The facility is licensed to operate for four (4) elderly residents ages 60 and above. The facility is approved for four (4) non ambulatory of which one (1) can be bedridden and two (2) can be under hospice care. The facility is a single-story structure located in a residential neighborhood. The facility consists of the following: three (3) resident's rooms, a staff room, three (3) bathrooms of which one (1) is designated for staff and visitors only, a living room area, a dining area, kitchen and a converted detached room which is used for staff. The washer and dryer is located next to the kitchen. LPA and caregiver Chris Gaytos toured the physical plant. There are no bodies of water or obstructions on the premises. All rooms were inspected. Beds and bedding supplies were in good condition,adequate lighting provided, storage for resident personal belongings was observed. Bed linens, comforters, and bath towels were adequately stocked at the time of visit. Bathrooms were found to be within Title 22 regulations and were clean and operational. A comfortable temperature was maintained in the facility. LPA observed the facility to be sanitary and appropriately furnished at the time of visit. Storage areas for personal hygiene, were stored and not accessible to residents. The kitchen was inspected and there is sufficient perishable and non-perishable food available maintained properly. There are two (2) fire extinguishers fully charged in the kitchen and the dining room. First aid kit was located and stored in near the Medications. Smoke detectors and carbon monoxide were operable. Evaluation Report Continues on LIC 809-C. During the visit, LPA observed the facility infection control practices. LPA observed screening protocols for visitors, staff, and residents, sanitizing stations in common areas and restrooms. LPA observed four (4) residents and two (2) staff present during the tour. Advisory Notes – Four (4) Technical Assistance were issued, please see LIC9102-AN. Five (5) deficiencies were cited during this inspection visit. See the Case Management 809 D pages. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report was provided to caregiver Chris Gaytos.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 15, 2022
The state marks this report as 6 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 2. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.
Mar 15, 2022Facility evaluation reportCase Management - DeficienciesDeficiency pages: Type A, Type B
Type of visit: Case Management - Deficiencies
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Don Senaha conducted a Case Management as part of the annual review required to cite the facility for deficiencies. Annual review was conducted on 3/15/22 and deficiencies were cited on 3/15/22. There were five (5) deficiencies cited during the visit. LPA discussed on the phone with Administrator Mark Loo all deficiencies and caregiver Chris Gaytos was ok to sign per Mark.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 15, 2022
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87303(e)(2) · Plan of correction due date: Mar 17, 2022
87303(e)(2) Maintenance and Operation. Hot water temperature controls shall be maintained to automatically regulat the temperature of hot water used by residents to attain a temperature of not less than 105 degrees F and not more than 120 degrees F. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on observation by LPA, the water tempeerature in the kitchen sink measured 130.5 F at 10:06am and 130.8 F at 10:18am in the shared bedroom bathroom which poses an immediate health and safety risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 15, 2022
Plan of correction: Per Administrator will adjust water and send pictures of the water temperature via email or text to LPA by 3/17/2022.
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR87309(a) · Plan of correction due date: Mar 17, 2022
87309(a) Storage Space. Disinfectants, cleaning solutions, poisons, firearms and other items which could pose a danger if readily available to clients shall be stored where inaccessible to clients. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on observation by LPA, there was bleach and laundry detergent on an open shelf next to the clients shared room which poses an immediate health and safety risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 15, 2022
Plan of correction: Caregiver immediately moved the disinfectants and cleaning solutions to a locked cabinet.
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87303(a) · Plan of correction due date: Mar 29, 2022
87303(a) The facility shall be clean, safe, sanitary and in good repair at all times. Maintenance shall include provision of maintenance services and procedures for the safety and well-being of residents, employees and visitors. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on observation, LPA observed a resident dresser on R4 room without handles to open the drawer at the facility which poses a potential health and safety risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 15, 2022
Plan of correction: Per Administrator will fix or replace the dresser by the POC date.
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR87506(a) · Plan of correction due date: Mar 29, 2022
87506(a) Resident Records. The licensee shall ensure that a separate, complete, and current record is maintained for each resident in the facility or in a central administrative location readily available to facility staff and licensing agency staff. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: LPA observed the resident record of the Medication Administration Records (MAR) were not up to date and maintained correctly which poses a potential health ad safety risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 15, 2022
Plan of correction: Administrator will do an in-service training and send me signed logs of records being maintained including the MAR.
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 80072(a)(2) · Plan of correction due date: Mar 17, 2022
Personal Rights To be accorded safe, healthful and comfortable accommodations, furnishings and equipment to meet his/her needs. This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on observation by LPA, resident R1 was in the converted garage room shared with a staff which poses an immediate health and safety risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 15, 2022
Plan of correction: Per Administrator will move the resident R1 back to her room in the facility by 3/17/22.
20211 state visit · 2 documents
Dec 16, 2021Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Severe neglect resulting in resident developing a pressure injury. Facility failed to address resident's change in medical condition .
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Ulysses Coronel made an unannounced visit to the facility, LPA met with caregiver Crisostomo Gaytos and spoke to Administrators Sherryl Rafols and Mark Loo via telephone. The purpose of this visit is to deliver the findings pertaining to the above-mentioned allegations. The insvestigation consisted of the following: Licensing Program Analyst (LPA Jennifer Jones) conducted the Initial 10-Day visit on 11/14/19. During the visit, LPA Jones met with Staff #1 (S1: Crisostono Gaytos) and Staff #2 (S2: Marilyn Nery), toured the facility, reviewed Residents (1-5) files, and obtained copies of Resident #1's files (Physician’s Report, Admission Agreement, Emergency Contact Info, and Home Health Agency notes) including facility staff training records. A separate investigation was conducted by the Department of Social Services Investigator (Laura Garcia) which included reviewing medical records and home health agency notes (dated 08/29/19 – 11/06/19); interviews with facility staff, residents’ relatives, home health staff, and medical staff. Substantiated Regarding Allegation #1: this investigation revealed that upon admission to the facility on 08/25/19, the physician’s report (dated 08/01/19) documented that Resident #1 (referred to as R1) had a history of skin condition/breakdown. Medical records (dated 08/26/19) noted a physical examination was performed on Resident #1 for pressure injuries present during hospital admission: right toe – Stage 2; Right heel – Stage 3 without surrounding erythema or purulence; severe Sepsis with acute organ dysfunction, non-traumatic acute kidney injury, BPH with urinary retention, Dementia, severe protein calorie malnutrition, venous statis edema with ulcer. Home health agency records (dated 08/26/19) documented that Resident #1 was referred to ComCare Home Health (an affiliate of Kaiser Permanente Medical Group) and was first seen by one of the on-site home health agency nurses on 08/29/19 for start of care. Home Health RN noted multiple wound locations: Unstageable pressure injuries on the left and right buttock/ open-skin injury on right toe, and open Stage 2 pressure injury on right heel. All wounds were reported to physician and coordinated to facility staff. ComCare Home Health Skilled Nurse (Florence Atena) instructed PCG’s in pressure management and prevention; of which, facility staff verbalized understanding. Medical records (dated 09/28/19) revealed that Resident #1 was hospitalized due to severe sepsis and was discharged back to the facility on 10/03/19. Resident #1 had wounds on: left heel – unstageable pressure injury; right heel – open Stage 2 pressure injury, measuring 3x3x0cm; right great toe – open skin injury, measuring 1x0.5x0cm; left buttock – unstageable . ComCare Home Health received the order (dated 10/04/19) to resume home health care to Resident #1. Staff #1 told ComCare Home Health Skilled Nurse, Florence Atena (on 10/11/19) that he had performed wound care on Resident #1’s sacrococcyx and did not allow Skilled Nurse Atena to turn Resident #1 (again) to check the wound. Skilled Nurse Atena documented and reported Resident #1’s health and behavioral condition. Based on Skilled Nurse Atena’s observations, it was believed that Resident #1 required a higher level of care. Skilled Nurse Atena continued daily wound care visits for Resident #1 and foley catheter change on 10/16/19. On 10/23/19, upon re-cert visit, Home Health RN, noted an unstageable pressure ulcer on Resident #1’s left hip and reported to medical doctor about the new wounds and recommended wound care treatment. On 11/06/19, Resident #1 was hospitalized due to a septic shock, dehydration, and pressure injuries. Resident #1 expired on 12/04/19. Based on evidence gathered and interviews conducted and records reviewed, the preponderance of evidence standard has not been met; therefore, the allegation NEGLECT/LACK OF SUPERVISION: Severe neglect resulting in resident developing a pressure injury is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. Regarding Allegation #2: this investigation revealed that on 10/23/19, it was determined that Resident (#1) (referred to as R1) was diagnosed with the following pressure injuries: Wound 1 – right heel (measured 6.7 x 6.5 cm); Wound 2 – left heel (measured 3.5 x 3.2 cm); Wound 3 – left hip (measured 10.4 x 6.7 cm); Wound 4 – right hallux, no odor, no drainage, wound bed appearance necrotic; Wound 5 – bilateral buttocks with moderate serosanguineous drainage, yellow wound bed appearance. ComCare Home Health instructions to facility staff were to keep these areas dry and clean as well as keeping pressure off by elevating and rotating Resident #1 regularly. A review of Resident #1’s “Needs and Services Plan” (dated 08/25/19) did not document information about potential pressure injuries or change in condition prior to the Resident #1’s hospitalization on 09/28/19. Based on evidence gathered and interviews conducted and records reviewed, the preponderance of evidence standard has not been met; therefore, the allegation NEGLECT/LACK OF SUPERVISION: Facility failed to address resident's change in medical condition is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. According to the California Code of Regulations (Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8), the following deficiency observed and citation issued (ref. LIC 9099D) – civil penalty will be assessed. At this time, an enhanced civil penalty determination is pending in reference to Health & Safety Code 1569.49(e)(1)(A) “Serious Bodily Injury” as defined in Section 243 of the Penal Code that states, a serious physical condition, including, but not limited to, the following: loss of consciousness; concussion; bone fracture; protracted loss or impairment of any bodily member or organ; a wound requiring extensive suturing; and serious disfigurement.” An exit interview was conducted and copy of the Complaint Report and Appeal Rights were provided to Administrators Sherryl Rafols and Mark Loo.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 16, 2021 · control 11-AS-20191113101336
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87615(a)(1) · Plan of correction due date: Dec 17, 2021
Prohibited Health Conditions: Persons who require health services or have a health condition including; but not limited to, those specified below shall not be admitted or retained in a residential care facility for the elderly: Stage 3 and 4 pressure sores (dermal ulcers). This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Upon admission R1 Physician’s Report (8/1/19) documented that R1 had a history of skin breakdown, Stage 3 pressure injury on the right heel/arterial ulcer. On 11/6/19, R1 had 3 unstageable pressure injuries. Staff was aware of R1’s wound condition and retained R1 with a prohibited health condition. R1 expired on 12/04/19.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 16, 2021
Plan of correction: The administrator shall read Title 22, Section 87615(a)(1) "Prohibited Health Conditions" and send a written statement to CCLD by the POC date that she will ensure to stay in constant communication with the medical professional; and if the resident's medical condition elevates (meaning they require a higher level of care), Administrator will ensure the resident is relocated to a skilled-nursing facility or hospital; and, the relocation will take place immediately. This POC is due to CCLD/El Segundo ASC Office on 12/17/2021.
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87466 · Plan of correction due date: Dec 17, 2021
87466 Observation of the Resident: The licensee shall ensure that residents are regularly observed for changes in physical, mental, emotional, and social functioning and that appropriate assistance is provided when such observation reveals unmet needs. When changes such as ... physical health condition are observed , the licensee shall ensure that such changes are documented and brought to the attention of the resident’s physician and the resident’s responsible party, if any. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Facility staff admitted to having knowledge of Resident #1’s change of medical condition.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 16, 2021
Plan of correction: The administrator shall read Title 22, Section 87466 “Observation of the Resident” and send a written statement to CCLD by the POC date that Administrator will observe any change of condition by a resident and conduct an assessment of the resident and inform the resident’s physician and resident’s responsible person of an outcome. The plan is due to CCLD/El Segundo ASC Office by POC date of 12/17/2021.
Dec 16, 2021Facility evaluation reportCase Management - DeficienciesDeficiency page: Type B
Type of visit: Case Management - Deficiencies
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Ulysses Coronel made an unannounced visit to the facility and was greeted by caregiver Crisostomo Gaytos and spoke to Administrators Sherryl Rafols and Mark Loo via telephone. The purpose of this visit is to deliver a generated Case Management – Deficiencies, evaluation report in conjunction with Complaint Control #11-AS-20191113101336 due to the following observations: This investigation revealed that Resident #1 was restrained to the bedrails utilizing pieces of cloth sheets and shirts. The cloth restraints were placed around the resident’s wrists – while the resident was wearing gloves. Staff #1 admitted the purpose of the restraints were to prevent Resident #1 from removing the Foley catheter and scratching its wounds; as the resident would get agitated. Staff #1 expressed the necessity to occasionally restrain Resident #1 in different positions in order to prevent the resident from placing pressure on its wounds. On several occasions, ComCare Home Health Nurse observed Resident #1 tied to the bed rails in this same manner and would instruct Staff #1 to immediately remove the restraints. It seemed to be a reoccurring event requiring the HHA Nurse to repeatedly order Staff #1 to remove these restraints from Resident #1. Based on the evidence gathered and interviews conducted and records reviewed, the preponderance of evidence standard has not been met; therefore, the allegation PERSONAL RIGHTS: Resident was restrained by the hands to the bedrails is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. According to the California Code of Regulations (Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8), the following deficiency was observed and a citation issued (ref. LIC 9099D). An exit interview was conducted and copy of the Complaint Report and Appeal Rights were provided to Administrator (FULL NAME).the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 16, 2021
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87468.1(a)(3) · Plan of correction due date: Dec 24, 2021
87468.1(a)(3) Personal Rights of Residents in All Facilities: To be free from punishment, humiliation, intimidation, abuse, or other actions of a punitive nature; such as, withholding residents money or interfering with daily-living functions; such as, eating, sleeping, or elimination. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Staff #1 admitted the purpose of the restraints and expressed the necessity to occasionally restrain Resident #1 in different positions. Which poses a potential Health and safety risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 16, 2021
Plan of correction: The administrator shall read Title 22, Section 87468.1(a)(3) “Personal Rights of Residents in All Facilities” and send a written statement to CCLD by the POC date that Administrator will ensure that a resident in the facility will be free from punishment and abuse or other actions of a punitive nature. The plan is due to CCLD/El Segundo ASC Office by POC date of 12/24/2021.
4 of 4 beds were occupied at the December 29, 2025 state visit — a count on that day, not an opening.
License holder
Loo Venture Group, LLC, licensed since 2012.
The state’s totals for this licenseSince 2012, as the state’s facility page counts them
- State visits on file
- 15
- Total complaints
- 4
- Substantiated allegations
- 0
- Type A citations
- 0
- Type B citations
- 0
These are the state’s own totals for this license since 2012, per CDSS records. The state counts them apart from the documents above, and they can differ from what those documents show; the documents say what each visit found. One complaint can contain several allegations.
Compare with homes the same size
| This home | Typical | |
|---|---|---|
| Type A citations | 0 | 0 |
| Type B citations | 0 | 0 |
| Substantiated allegations | 0 | 0 |
| Total complaints | 4 | 0 |
“Typical” is the statewide median for licensed homes this size. It does not adjust for years licensed, and older licenses have had more visits and reports. The median is across the 6,916 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record. The figures compared are the state’s totals, not the documents.
What the state’s words mean
CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents stand in their place.
Frequently asked questions
A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.
Quick answers about Summer House at Ladera Heights
Is Summer House at Ladera Heights licensed?
The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
How many residents is Summer House at Ladera Heights licensed for?
4 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Has Summer House at Ladera Heights been cited?
0 Type A and 0 Type B citations since 2012, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. Those records count 15 state visits over the same years.
Is Summer House at Ladera Heights still open?
This license was on the CDSS roster as of November 12, 2026.
What does Summer House at Ladera Heights cost?
$5,700 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $4,650–$7,000. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 24 small homes and similar homes within 9 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
Among 9 other homes of a similar licensed size in Los Angeles that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $4,375 to $8,250 a month, and the middle figure is $7,000 (n = 9 other homes publishing a starting rate).
Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.
A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.
The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.
A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.
Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
Does Summer House at Ladera Heights take Medi-Cal?
On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated October 1, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
Who holds the license?
The license is held by Loo Venture Group, LLC, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Is there a hospital nearby?
Kindred Hospital - Los Angeles is 1 mile away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.
Can Summer House at Ladera Heights keep a resident on hospice?
Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 2 residents, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Summer House at Ladera Heights license and inspection record
- Name on the license: “SUMMER HOUSE AT LADERA HEIGHTS”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
- License #197608232. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- Licensed for 4 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- Licensed to Loo Venture Group, LLC, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- First licensed in 2012, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- 15 state inspection visits since 2012, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- 0 Type A and 0 Type B citations on file since 2012, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. The same records count 15 state visits in that period.
- 4 complaints and 0 substantiated allegations on file since 2012, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
- The most recent state visit on file is February 25, 2026, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗
Nearby
Other homes nearby
Licensed homes near this one in Los Angeles County, most information on file first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.
- Map
Starting rate
$7,000 a month to start
Listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$5,550 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $4,550–$6,850On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$5,200 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $4,250–$6,400On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$6,200 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $5,050–$7,600On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$6,100 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $5,000–$7,500On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$5,350 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $4,350–$6,550On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
Street maps © Protomaps · © OpenStreetMap
Explore Los Angeles County