Illustration — no photo of this home on file yet

Strawberry Hill at Gill Port

Small home·Licensed for 6·Walnut Creek, California

Licensed since 2025Licence #79201416
  • Care approvals on fileWheelchair · Dementia · Hospice · BedriddenState licensing record · September 27, 2026
  • Estimated starting rate$5,450 a monthCovelight estimate · likely $4,450–$6,700
  • Home sizeLicensed for 6Small care home · a licensed care home (RCFE)
  • Room at the last state visit6 of 6 beds occupiedJuly 13, 2026 · not a current opening
  • Ways to payAsk the homeMedi-Cal ALW participation not on file
  • Last state visitJuly 13, 2026CDSS inspection record

Strawberry Hill at Gill Port is a small care home in Walnut Creek — a licensed residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE), the licence category behind “assisted living” and “board and care.” It is licensed for 6 residents since 2025.

Built from CDSS public records · September 27, 2026. Every fact below names its source and date.

Quick answers and the state record

A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

Quick answers about Strawberry Hill at Gill Port

Is Strawberry Hill at Gill Port licensed?

The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

How many residents is Strawberry Hill at Gill Port licensed for?

6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Has Strawberry Hill at Gill Port been cited?

0 Type A and 0 Type B citations since 2025, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. Those records count 13 state visits over the same years.

Is Strawberry Hill at Gill Port still open?

This license was on the CDSS roster as of September 28, 2026.

What does Strawberry Hill at Gill Port cost?

$5,450 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $4,450–$6,700. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 19 small homes and similar homes within 3 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

Among 8 other homes of a similar licensed size in Walnut Creek that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $3,448 to $6,500 a month, and the middle figure is $5,000 (n = 8 other homes publishing a starting rate).

Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.

A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.

The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.

A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.

Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.

Does Strawberry Hill at Gill Port take Medi-Cal?

On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.

Who holds the license?

The license is held by Jpa7 LLC, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Is there a hospital nearby?

John Muir Medical Center-Walnut Creek Campus is 1.3 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.

Can Strawberry Hill at Gill Port keep a resident on hospice?

Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 4 residents, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Strawberry Hill at Gill Port license and inspection record

  • Name on the license: “STRAWBERRY HILL AT GILL PORT”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
  • License #79201416. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • Licensed for 6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • Licensed to Jpa7 LLC, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • First licensed in 2025, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • 13 state inspection visits since 2025, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • 0 Type A and 0 Type B citations on file since 2025, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. The same records count 13 state visits in that period.
  • 1 complaint and 0 substantiated allegations on file since 2025, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
  • The most recent state visit on file is July 13, 2026, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
Type A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗

See the state’s own record

Can they support the care needed?

California licenses a home for specific kinds of care. The state’s record lists what this home is approved for; the home’s own answers fill in what changes as needs change.

  • Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved · covers up to 6 residents
  • Dementia / memory careApproved by the state
  • Hospice careApproved · covers up to 4 residents
  • BedriddenApproved · covers up to 1 resident

State licensing record · September 27, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.

Read the state’s own wording
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. APPROVED FOR SIX(6) NON-AMBULATORY RESIDENTS, OF WHICH ONE(1) MAY BE BEDRIDDEN IN ROOM #5. WAIVER/GRANTED FOR HOSPICE CARE FOR (4).

983 - RCFE / DEMENTIA

CDSS record, verbatim · September 27, 2026

As needs change

  • Staying through hospice

    Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 4 — care may continue at the end of life

    Ask: “If hospice is needed, can care continue here until the end?”

    State licensing record · September 27, 2026

  • If memory loss develops

    Dementia-care designation on file

    Ask: “Can we read the dementia care disclosure and discuss how daily support works?”

    State licensing record · September 27, 2026

3 more questions to ask the home
  • Two-person transfers or a lift

    Not on file

    Ask: “If two people or a lift are needed to transfer, can the person stay?”

  • Someone awake overnight

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?”

  • Medicines

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who manages the medicines, and what happens when a dose is missed?”

Care & day-to-day support

These are the home’s own statements about its day-to-day practice — they are not part of the state licensing record, and the state has not approved or reviewed them.

What it costs here

Covelight estimate

$5,450a month to start

Likely $4,450–$6,700

From 19 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file

Likely monthly total

$5,450a month

Likely $4,450–$6,850

With a shared room and basic help.

An estimate for planning, not a quote. The price is made in the phone call.

See the full cost breakdownRoom, care and fees · how people pay · how this estimate works
Room
Daily care
Sharing the room
  • Starting monthly rate$5,450likely $4,450–$6,700

    Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 19 small homes and similar homes within 3 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

  • Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600

    Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (45 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).

  • One-time move-in fee$2,000one time · likely $0–$4,000

    Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,000 (134 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.

Likely monthly totalLikely $4,450–$6,850
$5,450
First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $5,200–$9,900
$7,450
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
  • Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
  • Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
  • SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
  • VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
  • Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
  • MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
If the money runs out, what Medi-Cal covers
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
  • The care level

    Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.

  • What is billed separately

    Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.

  • Move-in costs

    A one-time community fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.

  • Increases

    California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.

  • What is the full monthly cost for the room and care we need, and what does it include?
  • What would the next care level cost, and who decides when it changes?
  • What is billed separately, and is there a one-time fee or deposit at move-in?
  • Is any private-pay period required before another payment program can begin?
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 19 small homes and similar homes within 3 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

19 homes like this within 3 miles publish starting rates mostly between $3,400–$6,650.

  • Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
  • Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
  • Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
  • Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
  • We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
  • It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Show the 19 nearby homes behind this estimate

Where it is

  • 2069 Gill Port Ln, Walnut Creek, CA 94598Address from the public record · September 27, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.

Opening the neighborhood map…

The state record

California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. Here are the dated documents and the state’s own words, beside what is typical for homes this size.

Since 2024, the state has filed 13 documents for this home, and its records count 13 visits since 2025. The most recent — a complaint investigation report on July 13, 2026 — closed with the state’s outcome word: “Unsubstantiated.”

On file since
2024
State visits
13
Most recent visit
July 13, 2026
Occupied at that visit
6 of 6 bedsa count on that day, not an opening

We hold 1 complaint report the state published for this home, dated July 13, 2026. 1 of the 1 carries the state's recorded outcome word: “Unsubstantiated” (1). 1 includes the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word. Summary composed by computer from the 1 complaint report below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

Beside homes the same size

  • Type A citations0typical 0
  • Type B citations0typical 0
  • Substantiated allegations0typical 0
  • Total complaints1typical 0

“Typical” is the statewide median across the 6,808 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this licence since 2025.

Year by year
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated202633020258902024110

The last 36 months — 13 of 13 documents

20263 state visits · 3 documents
Jul 13, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility did not provide adequate food service Staff did not provide adequate care Staff not competent and sufficient to provide care Facility did not address residents change in condition

On 7/13/2026 at 1:00PM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), A Gomez arrived unannounced to deliver findings for complaint allegations above. LPA met with Caregiver, Christian Malicsi and explained the reason for the visit. House Manager Rouge Castro approved caregiver to sign off on todays report. Christian Malicsi is also listed on the designation of facility responsibility. During the course of the investigation interviews were conducted, available records were reviewed, and observations were made. Report continues on LIC9099-C Unsubstantiated On the allegation “Facility did not provide adequate food service” LPA observed the current food service including but not limited to food available in the pantry, refrigerator, and meals being served. LPA observed the food service satisfactory. Through interview with W1 it was found that the nature of the allegation stem from a previous owner/facility that no longer exists and records are unavailable therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated On the allegation “Staff did not provide adequate care” LPA attempted to identify the previous staff and residents for the time frame of the allegation. Through interview with W1 it was found that the nature of the allegation stem from a previous owner/facility that no longer exists and records are unavailable. LPA observed that the current staff and facility provide adequate care therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated On the allegation “Staff not competent and sufficient to provide care” ” LPA attempted to identify the previous staff and residents for the time frame of the allegation. Through interview with W1 it was found that the nature of the allegation stem from a previous owner/facility that no longer exists and records are unavailable. LPA observed that current staff are up to date on all training's and competent to provide care therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated On the allegation “Facility did not address residents change in condition” LPA attempted to identify the previous staff and residents for the time frame of the allegation. LPA was unable to obtain any records for R1. Through interview with W1 it was found that the nature of the allegation stem from a previous owner/facility that no longer exists and records are unavailable therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 13, 2026 · control 15-AS-20260225212617
Feb 27, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Other

On 2/27/2026 at 3:20pm, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) A. Gomez arrived unannounced to conduct a Case Management visit. LPA met with Annabel Danan, House Manager and explained the purpose of the visit. While LPA A. Gomez was conducting a complaint investigation (15-AS-20260225212617) on 2/27/2026. LPA observed medications on the living room couch unsecured and unlocked. The deficiency is cited per Title 22 California Code of Regulations and listed on LIC809D. Failure to submit proof of corrections (POC) by plan of correction due date and/or any repeat deficiencies within a 12-month period may result in civil penalties. Exit interview conducted. A copy of this report and appeal rights providedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 27, 2026

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87465(h)(2) · Plan of correction due date: Feb 27, 2026

(h) The following requirements shall apply to medications which are centrally stored:(2) Centrally stored medicines shall be kept in a safe and locked place that is not accessible to persons other than employees responsible for the supervision of the centrally stored medication. The following requirement was not met as evidence by Based on observation the facility did not meet the requirement by having unsecured perscription medication on the living room couch which posed an immediate safety concern to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 27, 2026

Plan of correction: Staff locked away the medications POC clear

Jan 14, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

On 1/14/2026 at 10:15 AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) James Sampair arrived unannounced to conduct this Required Annual Inspection. Upon entry, the LPA stated the purpose of the visit to Administrators Merdith and Rogue Castro. The LPA toured the facility including but not limited to residents’ rooms, bathrooms, kitchen, common areas and the backyard. The LPA observed adequate lighting for the comfort and safety of residents in all rooms. Inside and outside areas are free of obstruction and no bodies of water. The temperature in the dining room was measured at 72.5 degrees Fahrenheit at 12:20 PM. The maximum hot water temperature was in the safe range of 105 to 120 degrees Fahrenheit. The residents’ bathrooms are equipped with grab bars and slip-resistant mats. There is more than the minimum of a one week supply of nonperishable foods and 2 days of perishable foods. Centrally stored medications, sharps, and toxic cleaners are inaccessible to residents in care. The LPA observed the required postings in the facility, including the Residential Care Facility for the Elderly Complaint Poster, Ombudsman and Personal Rights posters, and the Theft and Loss Policy. Smoke detectors and carbon monoxide detectors were tested and found to be in operating condition. The fire extinguishers were fully charged and serviced on 10/17/2025. The Emergency Disaster Plan was reviewed within the past year; the most recent review was on 3/15/2025. Emergency, disaster, and fire drills were not conducted on a quarterly basis. First aid kit was observed to be complete. Liability insurance expires on 9/3/2026. Continued on LIC 809-C . . . . . . Continued from LIC 809 Following deficiencies observed during visit: 12:45 PM: record review showed quarterly Emergency & Disaster drills not being done. 3:35 PM: record review showed that 40 hours of new staff training not done over the past 12 months. 3:45 PM: record review showed that 20 hours of existing staff training not done over the past 12 months. 4:05 PM: record review showed that 10 hours of new staff medication training not done over the past 12 months. 4:15 PM: record review showed that 8 hours of existing staff medication training not done over the past 12 months. The LPA reviewed 5 resident records and 5 staff records. 5 B Type citations were issued during the inspection. Deficiencies are cited per Title 22 California Code of Regulations and listed on LIC 809-D. Failure to submit Proof of Corrections (POCs) by plan of correction due date and/or any repeat deficiencies within a 12-month period may result in civil penalties. Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 14, 2026
20258 state visits · 9 documents
Dec 17, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Office

On 12/17/2025 at 4:00 PM, an Informal Meeting was held via video conference with Administrator and Licensee Board Member Mary Asilum and Licensee Board Member Frank Asilum. The purpose of this Informal Meeting was to discuss the letter dated September 3, 2025 that was sent to resident families inappropriately announcing the transition of ownership and administration of the facility. Attendees: Harpreet Humpal - Licensing Program Manager (LPM) James Sampair - Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Mary Asilum - Administrator and Licensee Board Member Frank Asilum - Licensee Board Member Issues discussed during the meeting: Licensees understand that they will retain control of property and stay on and be responsible for the operation of the facility until it is licensed by a new owner. Licensees understand that they will make no announcement of ownership transition until new owners have completed the application process and have been issued a license. Licensees will send letter rescinding the September 3, 2025 letter to Responsible Parties for every resident. Licensees understand that they may hire an administrator who must work a minimum of 20 hours per week during normal business hours. Licensees understand that they will establish hours being worked by current administrator Roche Castro and that they will send an LIC 500 to LPA Sampair by December 29, 2025 Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report provided to Licensee via Emailthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 17, 2025
Oct 9, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: POC

At 11:45 AM on 10/09/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) James Sampair arrived unannounced for this Plan of Correction (POC) concerning the citations from the 9/30/2025 visit. Upon entry into the facility, the LPA identified himself and stated the purpose of the visit to Caregiver Julie Dual. Licensee applicants Merdith Ong-Castro and Rogue Castro arrived at approximately 12:30 PM. The LPA was able to clear 2 of the 3 citations from 9/30/2025. The LPA verified that Staff S1 who was not fingerprint cleared on 9/30/2025 was not present and no longer works at this facility. The LPA verified that Staff S3 is associated with the facility. The LPA was not able to clear the citation for Title 22 Regulation 87405(a), because the Licensee had neither hired nor appointed a certified Administrator by the due date of 10/07/2025. Civil Penalties totaling $200 have been assessed today for failure to meet POC due dates for this deficiency. The Licensee is subject to ongoing daily civil penalties until the deficiency has been corrected and proof of the correction has been sent to Community Care Licensing (CCL). Exit interview conducted. A copy of this report, appeal rights, and the LIC 421-FC have been provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 9, 2025
Sep 30, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Other

At 2:00 PM on 9/30/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) James Sampair arrived unannounced for this Case Management visit regarding the change of ownership and change of administrator notification received from Licensee / Administrator (ADM) Mary Asilum on 9/23/2025. Upon entry into the facility, the LPA identified himself and stated the purpose of the visit to Caregiver Julie Dual. The LPA interviewed Staff S1 and Staff S2 in person and Staff S3 and Staff S4 by telephone about the change in ownership and the change in ADM. Before arriving at the facility, the LPA discovered that S4, whom the ADM had stated was taking over ADM duties, had an expired ADM certificate. While at the facility, the LPA discovered that S3, who had been acting as ADM, had no ADM certificate at all. During the inspection, the LPA discovered from record reviews that S3 was not associated with the facility and S1 was not fingerprint cleared. 2 Type-A and 1 Type-B citations were issued during this inspection (for details refer to LIC 809-D). Deficiencies are cited from Title 22 California Code of Regulations (refer to LIC 809-D). Failure to submit proof of correction may result in additional civil penalty. Exit interview conducted and a copy of the Appeal Rights, and this report provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 30, 2025

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87355(e)(2) · Plan of correction due date: Oct 1, 2025

87355 Criminal Record Clearance (e) All individuals subject to a criminal record review . . . shall prior to working . . . in a licensed facility: (2) Obtain a California clearance or a criminal record exemption as required by the Department. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review, licensee did not comply with the section cited above. Staff S1 was not fingerprint cleared, which poses an immediate health and safety risk to the persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 30, 2025

Plan of correction: On or before the due date, the Licensee has agreed to remove S1 from the facility until the CDSS Action Required Background Check ID: 7717780 per ID: 4600869903 has been completed to complete S1's fingerprint clearance process and to associate S1 with the facility. Civil penalty of $500 is being assessed.

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR87355(e)(3) · Plan of correction due date: Oct 1, 2025

87355 Criminal Record Clearance (e) All individuals subject to a criminal record review . . . shall prior to working . . . in a licensed facility: (3) Request a transfer of a criminal record clearance . . . This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review, licensee did not comply with the section cited above. Staff S3's fingerprint clearance had not been transferred to this facility, which poses an immediate health and safety risk to the persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 30, 2025

Plan of correction: On or before the due date, the Licensee has agreed to not allow S3 to return to the facility until they have their background clearance transferred to this facility. Civil penalty of $500 is being assessed.

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87405(a) · Plan of correction due date: Oct 7, 2025

87405 Administrator - Qualifications and Duties (a) All facilities shall have a qualified and currently certified administrator. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews, Licensee did not comply with the section cited above. From interviews of Staff S1 through S4, it was established that Administrator (ADM) Mary Asilum has not been fulfilling the duties of an administrator for at least 6 weeks.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 30, 2025

Plan of correction: On or before the due date, the Licensee shall hire a certified Administrator.

Jul 15, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Other

On 7/15/2025 at 12:05pm, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) L. Hall and conducted an unannounced Case Management visit. LPA met with Erma "Julie" Dual, Caregiver and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA spoke with Administrator, Mary Asilum, via telephone. Upon arrival LPA observed S3 was not listed on guardian. LPA spoke with S3 and was told S3 has been employed for three (3) days. LPA verified that S3 was fingerprint cleared. LPA spoke with Administrator and was told that all paperwork for S3 has been received, but is not at the facility. *An immediate civil penalty of $300.00 will be assessed on today's date for association (87355(e)). Deficiency is cited per Title 22 California Code of Regulations and listed on LIC809D. Failure to submit proof of corrections (POC) by plan of correction due date and/or any repeat deficiencies within a 12-month period may result in civil penalties. Exit interview conducted. A copy of the appeal rights, LIC421BG, and this report provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 15, 2025

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87355(e) · Plan of correction due date: Jul 16, 2025

(e) All individuals subject to a criminal record review... shall prior to working, residing or volunteering in a licensed facility: This requirement was not met as evidence by: Based on record review and interview the Licensee did not comply with the section cited above in having S3 associated to the facility which poses an immediate health and safety risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 15, 2025

Plan of correction: Administrator agreed to associate or submit LIC9182 and a copy of S3's identification to CCLD by POC date.

Jul 15, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Incident

On 7/15/2025 at 11:10am, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) L. Hall and conducted an unannounced Case Management visit regarding an incident that was reported to CCLD on 7/11/2025. LPA met with Erma "Julie" Dual, Caregiver and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA spoke with Administrator, Mary Asilum, via telephone. The incident reported occurred on 7/5/2025. The report stated on 7/5/2025, S2 administered 150mg dosage of medication instead of 75mg. S1 stated that S2 was not supposed to administer the medication. S2 stated that R1's responsible party was notified. S1 stated R1 was observed during the day but there were no changes. S4 stated S2 was terminated. S2 also stated there was an in-service training for all staff. LPA requested a copy the in-service training to be submitted to CCLD by close of business today. Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 15, 2025
Mar 21, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Post Licensing

On March 21, 2025 at 10:00 AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) James Sampair arrived unannounced to conduct this post licensing inspection. The LPA informed Caregiver Erma (Julie) Dual of the purpose of this visit and informed Administrator Mary Asilum of the purpose of this visit by phone. The LPA inspected the inside and outside of the facility. The inspection included the kitchen, dining area, common areas, bedrooms, and yard outside common areas. An adequate amount of food supplies were observed, more than the required minimum of 2 days of perishable and 7 days of non-perishable food. The central storage for medications was locked. The cleaning supplies and dangerous objects were stored in locked cabinets. The Facility has working smoke and carbon monoxide detectors. The staff of the facility conduct disaster / emergency and fire drills on a quarterly basis. The fire extinguishers were all replaced on May 3, 2024. The indoor temperature was 70.8 degrees Fahrenheit and the maximum hot water temperature was 111.7 degrees Fahrenheit, both within the acceptable range. The LPA reviewed facility, resident, and staff records. No citation was issued during this inspection. Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 21, 2025
Jan 17, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Other

On 1/17/2025 at 12:00 PM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) arrived at the facility for an announced Case Management visit to provide the COMP III training to Applicant/Administrator Mary Asilum. The LPA completed the training with Applicant/Administrator Mary Asilum. No citations issued. Exit interview completed and a copy of this report provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 17, 2025
Jan 9, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Other

On 1/9/2025 at 12:00 PM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) James Sampair arrived unannounced to complete the pre-licensing of the facility after completing a Plan of Correction (POC) visit. Upon arrival, LPA stated the purpose of the visit to Caregiver Erma Dual. The 3 A-Type and 2 B-Type citations were cleared. The Applicant Mary Asilum was not at the facility so the COMP III training was not completed. The LPA and Applicant scheduled a future date and time to conduct the COMP III training. No citations issued. Pre-Licensing is complete and this facility has no deficiencies. Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 9, 2025
Jan 3, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Prelicensing

On 1/03/2025 at 7:30 AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) James Sampair arrived unannounced to conduct a change of ownership prelicensing visit. Upon entry into the facility, the LPA informed Applicant Mary Asilum of the purpose of the visit. The LPA toured the facility inside and outside. The LPA inspected the kitchen, common areas, bedrooms, bathrooms, and the exterior of the facility. The facility was clean, appropriately furnished, and well lit. More than the 2 days of perishable and 7 days of nonperishable food supplies were available. No body of water was on the facility grounds. Medications are centrally stored. Bathrooms and showers were observed to be fully functioning and clean. Carbon monoxide and smoke detectors were operational. The fire extinguisher was last serviced on 05/03/2024. Inside temperature was 73.2 degrees Fahrenheit. Facility did not pass this prelicensing inspection. The LPA will return unannounced after the POCs have been completed with the existing Licensee. Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report provided to the Applicant.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 3, 2025
20241 state visit · 1 document
Dec 20, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Office

Component II completion: Successful Facility Type: RCFE Application Type: CHOW Capacity: 6 Census (if any clients in care): 5 COMP II Participants: Name - Francis Asilum CEO/ Mary Karoline Asilum Administrator Interview Method: Telephone interview On December 20, 2024, Applicant/Administrator participated in COMP II. Identification of the applicant and administrator was verified through interview questions based on photo ID and other identifying personal information. During COMP II, applicant and administrator confirmed that they have read and understand community care facility licensing laws included in the Health and Safety Codes and the California Code of Regulations Title 22. Signed LIC 809 with copy of photo ID have been obtained. During COMP II, CAB analyst confirmed Applicant/Administrator’s understanding of the following areas: 1. Facility operation: License type, client/resident populations, and program 2. Admission Policies 3. Staffing requirements & Training 4. Restrictive/Prohibited Health Conditions 5. General provisions 6. Emergency Preparedness 7. Complaints & Reporting 8. Pre-Licensing Readinessthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 20, 2024
What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedthere was not enough evidence to prove a violation occurred — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe evidence showed the allegation was false, could not have happened, or had no reasonable basisType A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗

An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents and the questions below stand in their place.

Life here

Rooms, meals, the rhythm of a day, faith and language, pets and house rules — as the home describes them. Tap any detail for its source and date; nothing here is graded.

Find a detail about life at this home.

Rooms & the spaces they will use

Meals, preferences & familiar food

  • Meals provided

    Reported on aplaceformom.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Vegetarian or vegan optionsVegetarian

    Reported on aplaceformom.com · seen September 9, 2026.

Activities & the rhythm of a day

  • Activity types offeredActivities On-site

    Reported on aplaceformom.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Trips outside the home

    Reported on aplaceformom.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Religious services off site

    Reported on aplaceformom.com · seen September 9, 2026.

Faith, culture & language

  • Languages spoken by caregiversFilipino · English

    Reported on aplaceformom.com · seen September 9, 2026.

Visiting & staying involved

  • Public transit access claimed

    Reported on aplaceformom.com · seen September 9, 2026.

Before you call

Ask every home the same questions — the state’s record does not answer these. Keep the ones that matter and they travel with your saved homes.

  1. What is included in the monthly rate, and what costs extra?
  2. Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?
  3. Which rooms does the non-ambulatory approval cover, and what transfer support is provided?
  4. What could change whether someone can stay here?
  5. Can we see a bedroom and share a meal during a visit?

Other homes nearby

The nearest licensed homes in Contra Costa County, closest first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.

Explore Contra Costa County