This licence is listed as closed. The state lists it as “Closed, Change of Ownership”, September 27, 2026.

Illustration — no photo of this home on file yet

Solaris 30

Small home·6 while this license was open·Poway, California

Closed in state recordLicence #374603814
  • Care approvals on fileWheelchair · Dementia · HospiceState licensing record · September 27, 2026
  • Home size6 while this license was openSmall care home · the state license record
  • Room at the last state visit5 of 6 beds occupiedJune 9, 2025 · not a current opening
  • Licence holderWealthplus Management Group LLCSince 2017 · 6 licensed homes

Solaris 30 in Poway held a license for a small care home — a residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE). The license covered 6 residents, first issued in 2017. The state lists this licence as “Closed, Change of Ownership.”

Built from CDSS public records · September 27, 2026. Every fact below names its source and date.

Quick answers and the state record

A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

Quick answers about Solaris 30

Is Solaris 30 licensed?

The state lists this license as “Closed, Change of Ownership,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

How many residents is Solaris 30 licensed for?

6 residents while this license was open — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Has Solaris 30 been cited?

0 Type A and 0 Type B citations since 2017, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. Those records count 10 state visits over the same years.

Is Solaris 30 still open?

This license is listed as closed, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

What does Solaris 30 cost?

This license is listed as closed, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Among 8 other homes of a similar licensed size in Poway that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $4,250 to $7,000 a month, and the middle figure is $5,250 (n = 8 other homes publishing a starting rate).

Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.

A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.

Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.

Does Solaris 30 take Medi-Cal?

On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this license is listed as closed. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.

Who holds the license?

The license was held by Wealthplus Management Group LLC, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Can Solaris 30 keep a resident on hospice?

Hospice care is on this closed license’s record, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Solaris 30 license and inspection record

  • Name on the license: “SOLARIS 30”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
  • License #374603814. The state lists this license as “Closed, Change of Ownership,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • This license covered 6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • This license was held by Wealthplus Management Group LLC, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • First licensed in 2017, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • 10 state inspection visits since 2017, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • 0 Type A and 0 Type B citations on file since 2017, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. The same records count 10 state visits in that period.
  • 2 complaints and 0 substantiated allegations on file since 2017, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
  • The most recent state visit on file is June 9, 2025, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
Type A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗

See the state’s own record

Can they support the care needed?

California licenses a home for specific kinds of care. The state’s record lists what this home is approved for; the home’s own answers fill in what changes as needs change.

  • Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved · covers up to 6 residents
  • Dementia / memory careApproved by the state
  • Hospice careApproved · covers up to 6 residents
  • BedriddenNot on file · ask the home

State licensing record · September 27, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.

Read the state’s own wording
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 6 NON-AMBULATORY. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 6.

983 - RCFE / DEMENTIA

CDSS record, verbatim · September 27, 2026

As needs change

  • Staying through hospice

    Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 6 — care may continue at the end of life

    Ask: “If hospice is needed, can care continue here until the end?”

    State licensing record · September 27, 2026

  • If memory loss develops

    Dementia-care designation on file

    Ask: “Can we read the dementia care disclosure and discuss how daily support works?”

    State licensing record · September 27, 2026

3 more questions to ask the home
  • Two-person transfers or a lift

    Not on file

    Ask: “If two people or a lift are needed to transfer, can the person stay?”

  • Someone awake overnight

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?”

  • Medicines

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who manages the medicines, and what happens when a dose is missed?”

What it costs here

Typical starting rate

$5,000a month to start

Likely $3,650–$6,850

From homes this size in San Diego County · this home’s rate is not on file

Likely monthly total

$5,000a month

Likely $3,650–$6,950

With a shared room and basic help.

An estimate for planning, not a quote. The price is made in the phone call.

See the full cost breakdownRoom, care and fees · how people pay · how this estimate works
Room
Daily care
Sharing the room
  • Starting monthly rate$5,000likely $3,650–$6,850

    Too few nearby homes publish a rate, so this is the typical starting rate 175 small homes publish in San Diego County, with a wider likely range. This home’s own rate is not on file.

  • Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600

    Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (45 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).

  • One-time move-in fee$2,000one time · likely $0–$4,000

    Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,000 (134 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.

Likely monthly totalLikely $3,650–$6,950
$5,000
First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $4,550–$9,800
$7,000
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
  • Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
  • Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis license is listed as closed. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
  • SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
  • VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
  • Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
  • MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
If the money runs out, what Medi-Cal covers
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
  • The care level

    Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.

  • What is billed separately

    Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.

  • Move-in costs

    A one-time community fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.

  • Increases

    California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.

  • What is the full monthly cost for the room and care we need, and what does it include?
  • What would the next care level cost, and who decides when it changes?
  • What is billed separately, and is there a one-time fee or deposit at move-in?
  • Is any private-pay period required before another payment program can begin?
How this estimate worksWhy this is a county figure

Too few nearby homes publish a rate, so this is the typical starting rate 175 small homes publish in San Diego County, with a wider likely range. This home’s own rate is not on file.

  • Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
  • Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
  • Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
  • Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
  • We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
  • It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.

Where it is

  • 14530 Garden Rd, Poway, CA 92064Address from the public record · September 27, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.

A map position is not on file for this address.

The state record

California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. Here are the dated documents and the state’s own words, beside what is typical for homes this size.

Since 2022, the state has filed 10 documents for this home, and its records count 10 visits since 2017. The most recent — a complaint investigation report on June 9, 2025 — closed with the state’s outcome word: “Unsubstantiated.”

On file since
2022
State visits
10
Most recent visit
June 9, 2025
Occupied at that visit
5 of 6 bedsa count on that day, not an opening

We hold 3 complaint reports the state published for this home, dated July 28, 2022 to June 9, 2025. 3 of the 3 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (1), “Unsubstantiated” (2). 3 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word. Summary composed by computer from the 3 complaint reports below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

Beside homes the same size

  • Type A citations0typical 0
  • Type B citations0typical 0
  • Substantiated allegations0typical 0
  • Total complaints2typical 0

“Typical” is the statewide median across the 6,808 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this licence since 2017.

Year by year
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated2025340202422020231102022331

The last 36 months — 7 of 10 documents

20253 state visits · 4 documents
Jun 9, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Licensee has abandoned the facility. Licensee has lost control of property. Licensee did not report sale of facility.

**REPORT WAS AMENDED ON 06/16/25 AND THE AMDENDED COPY WAS EMAILED TO LICENSEE** Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Liliana Silveira conducted a virtual meeting on Microsoft Teams with Licensee Xiaoqing “Leslie” Wang to deliver complaint findings. LPA stated the purpose of the meeting with Leslie. The investigation consisted of observations, interviews and a records review. On January 30, 2025, it was alleged that the Licensee had abandoned the facility. A Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) from the Department conducted an unannounced Health & Safety check on January 31, 2025. The LPA observed that there were caregivers present, changing residents and preparing dinner for the residents. The LPA also observed that the facility was clean. Interviews with the current acting Administrator revealed that in June 2024, two Administrators had quit and left the residents with care staff. (CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE, LIC 9099-C) Unsubstantiated (CONTINUED FROM LIC 9099) Interviews with three (3) care staff who worked at the facility during June 2024, revealed that even though the Administrators quit, care staff remained working at the facility until the Licensee came soon after to manage the facility. An interview with the Licensee revealed that in June 2024, as soon as they were informed that the Administrators quit, the Licensee returned to the facility to check on the residents and manage the facility. There was not enough evidence to support this allegation. It was also alleged that the Licensee had lost control of the property and did not report the sale of the property. A records review revealed that a Property Management Agreement provided by the Licensee, dated September 20, 2019, and with expiration date of September 20, 2029, demonstrated that the property is leased to Solaris Capital Group Inc. An interview with the Licensee revealed that they still act as property manager for the property via Solaris Capital Group Inc. The interview also revealed that the property owner has no intention of selling the property at this moment. An interview with the current Administrator, who represents a new management group, revealed that they are in current negotiations with the Licensee/Property Manager to take over the lease and have applied for a license with Community Care Licensing Division. There was not enough evidence to support these allegations. The allegations that the Licensee had abandoned the property, had lost control of the property and did not report the sale of the property are unsubstantiated. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations occurred, therefore the allegations are unsubstantiated. LPA Silveira conducted an exit interview with Leslie. A copy of the Complaint Investigation Report (LIC9099) and Licensee Rights (LIC9058 03/22) were provided via email. Confirmation via email by Linda confirms receipt of this report.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 9, 2025 · control 08-AS-20250130152909
Feb 26, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Deficiencies

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Amy Rodgers conducted an unannounced Case Management visit to respond to observations and interviews from a visit conducted on 2/8/2025. LPA was greeted by, identified herself to, and explained the purpose of the visit with Administrator Jushua "Justin" Mendoza. On 2/08/2025 LPA Observed cobwebs in all bathrooms and all bedrooms. All resident doors had fingerprints and splotches of dirt. All Bathroom shelves have brown splotches and brown spots. The kitchen cabinets had outside debris/dirt and grease. The oven vent was greasy and had debris/dirt. The back yard shed was in disrepair and had a door hanging to the side. The back yard fence in disrepair: missing pieces of fence and lattice is hanging off top of fence. Based on the inspection, deficiencies were observed in the areas evaluated, and observed deficiencies is listed on the LIC 809-D page. An exit interview was conducted, and this report was discussed with Administrator Mendoza. A copy of this report and Licensee/Appeal Rights (01/2016) were provided to the Administrator at the conclusion of the visit, and his signature on this form acknowledges receipt of the rights and a copy of this report.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 26, 2025

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87303(a) · Plan of correction due date: Mar 12, 2025

(a) The facility shall be clean, safe, sanitary and in good repair at all times. Maintenance... for the safety and well-being of residents, employees and visitors. This requirement is not met as evidenced Based on observations, the licensee did not ensure the facility was in good repair for 5 out of 5 [R1-R5] residents, due to , cobwebs in bathrooms and bedrooms, outside debris/dirt and greasy cabinets, greasy debris/dirt stove vent, back yard shed in disrepair, back yard fence in disrepair which poses a potential health and safety risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 26, 2025

Plan of correction: LPA spoke as well as toured the property with Administrator on 2/7/2025. Administrator was instructed by LPA to clean and repair the inside of the facility as well as the repair of backyard fencing and outside storage shed. LPA observed a clean and in good repair facility on 3/12/2025.

Feb 26, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Health Checks

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Tiffany Holmes conducted an unannounced Case Management visit. LPA was welcomed by, identified herself to, and discussed the purpose of the visit with Justin Mendoza, Administrator & Arceli Songco, Administrator LPA briefly toured the facility, performed a health and safety welfare check. There are no residents at this facility at this time. LPA Rodgers spoke with staff. No deficiencies were observed or cited on this date. An exit interview was conducted with Arceli Songco, Administrator, Administrator, to whom a copy of this report and the Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC9058 03/22) were provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 26, 2025
Feb 7, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Health Checks

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Amy Rodgers conducted an unannounced Case Management visit. LPA was welcomed by, identified herself to, and discussed the purpose of the visit with Justin Mendoza, Administrator. LPA briefly toured the facility, performed a health and safety welfare check. There are five (5) residents at this facility. LPA Rodgers spoke with staff. There are no health and safety concerns at this time. No deficiencies were observed or cited on this date. An exit interview was conducted with Justin Mendoza, Administrator, to whom a copy of this report and the Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC9058 03/22) were provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 7, 2025
20242 state visits · 2 documents
Jun 14, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Deficiencies

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Juliana Barfield conducted an unannounced complaint visit. LPA introduced herself to Maria Elena Bautista and discussed the purpose of the visit. During a tour of the facility LPA opened door to a resident (R1) bedroom. LPA smelled a strong odor of urine in the room and an unsanitary condition. Staff entered the room, confirmed the smell and agreed to clean up the unsanitary condition while LPA was onsite. A deficiency was cited Per Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8 of the California Code of Regulations (see LIC809-D). An exit interview was conducted with Anafe Rivera to whom a copy of this report and the Licensee appeal Rights (LIC9058) were provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 14, 2024

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87303(a) · Plan of correction due date: Jun 14, 2024

The facility shall be clean, safe and sanitary and in good repair at all times. Maintenance shall include provision of maintenance services and procedures for the safety and well-being of residents, employees and visitors.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 14, 2024

Plan of correction: Staff immediately cleaned unsanitary condition and aired room to remove foul odor.

May 13, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Juliana Barfield conducted an unannounced Required Annual Inspection. The facility file was reviewed prior to the visit. LPA was welcomed by, identified herself to, an discussed the purpose of the visit with Anafe Rivera. According to the facility’s license, the facility has a maximum capacity of six (6) residents, of whom six (6) may be non-ambulatory. During today’s inspection, there were a total of six (6) clients in care. This facility does not feature a secured perimeter or delayed egress doors. LPA, accompanied by Maria Bautista toured the interior and exterior of the facility, and inspected each room. Pathways were free of obstruction and slip hazards. Client bedrooms contained the required furnishings. Extra linens and hygiene supplies were present, as well as Personal Protective Equipment. The facility had sufficient space and equipment to facilitate dining, laundry, visitation, meetings, and client activities. Hot water temperature at taps accessible to clients were all compliant. There was at least 2 days supply of perishable food, and at least 7 days non-perishable food present. Cooking/dining equipment and utensils were present. There were no sharp objects, toxic chemicals/poisons, fireplaces, or open-faced heaters observed available to clients. Medications were labeled, as required, and stored in locked areas. (CONTINUED ON LIC809-C) (CONTINUED FROM LIC809) No pools or bodies of water were observed on the premises. Per the licensee's staff, no firearms or ammunition are kept at the facility. Smoke alarms, carbon monoxide detectors, emergency lighting, and facility telephone were all working. Fire extinguisher(s) were serviced within the last 12 months. First aid kit(s) were complete and readily accessible. Required licensing postings were observed in visible areas of the facility. Confidential records were stored in locked areas. Anafe Rivera also presented proof of current/active business liability insurance. No deficiencies were observed or cited during today's annual inspection.. An exit interview was conducted with Maria Bautista to whom a copy of this report and the Licensee/AppealRights (LIC9058 03/22) were provided during the visit.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 13, 2024
20231 state visit · 1 document
Dec 26, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility did not safeguard resident's personal property

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Sabel Martinez, conducted an unannounced complaint investigation visit to conduct additional interviews and deliver findings. The LPA introduced himself and disclosed the purpose of the visit to House Manager Jushua Mendoza. Throughout the investigation, the Department secured pertinent records and conducted interviews with internal and external sources. It was alleged the staff did not safeguard a resident's personal property. On 11/22/23, it was reported to the Department staff had removed one hundred dollars from a resident’s room. An interview with Resident # 1 (R1) revealed R1 left cash in a drawer, and some of the cash had gone missing. R1 did not witness anyone removing the cash. Interviews with internal and external sources did not reveal evidence corroborating the cash was removed by staff. Unsubstantiated Based on the investigation, there was not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation occurred, therefore, the allegation was Unsubstantiated. An exit interview was conducted with House Manager Mendoza, to whom a copy of this report, and Licensee/Appeals Rights (LIC 9058), were provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 26, 2023 · control 08-AS-20231122100344
What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedthere was not enough evidence to prove a violation occurred — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe evidence showed the allegation was false, could not have happened, or had no reasonable basisType A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗

An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents and the questions below stand in their place.

Who holds the licence

Wealthplus Management Group LLC, licensed since 2017, operates 6 licensed homes in California. Running more than one home is common and is neither good nor bad on its own.

Life here

Rooms, meals, the rhythm of a day, faith and language, pets and house rules — as the home describes them. Tap any detail for its source and date; nothing here is graded.

The home has not described daily life anywhere we have reviewed yet — that is the case for most small homes, and it says nothing about the home. These questions fill in the picture; keep the ones that matter to you.

Other homes nearby

Licensed homes in San Diego County. This home has no map location on the state record, so these are not ordered by distance. Every listed home appears on the same terms.

Explore San Diego County