Illustration — no photo of this home on file yet

Gate Manor III

Small home·Licensed for 6·Poway, California

Licensed since 2014Licence #374603449Medi-Cal ALW
  • Care approvals on fileWheelchair · Dementia · Hospice · BedriddenState licensing record · September 27, 2026
  • Estimated starting rate$4,900 a monthCovelight estimate · likely $4,050–$6,050
  • Home sizeLicensed for 6Small care home · a licensed care home (RCFE)
  • Room at the last state visit5 of 6 beds occupiedOctober 3, 2025 · not a current opening
  • Ways to payMedi-Cal ALW acceptedDHCS participant list · August 9, 2026
  • Last state visitJune 3, 2026CDSS inspection record
  • Licence holderHealth Gate Assisted Living LLCSince 2014 · 3 licensed homes

Gate Manor III is a small care home in Poway — a licensed residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE), the licence category behind “assisted living” and “board and care.” It is licensed for 6 residents since 2014.

Built from CDSS public records · September 27, 2026. Every fact below names its source and date.

Quick answers and the state record

A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

Quick answers about Gate Manor III

Is Gate Manor III licensed?

The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

How many residents is Gate Manor III licensed for?

6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Has Gate Manor III been cited?

0 Type A and 0 Type B citations since 2014, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. Those records count 10 state visits over the same years.

Is Gate Manor III still open?

This license was on the CDSS roster as of September 28, 2026.

What does Gate Manor III cost?

$4,900 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $4,050–$6,050. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 13 small homes and similar homes within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

Among 8 other homes of a similar licensed size in Poway that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $4,250 to $7,000 a month, and the middle figure is $5,250 (n = 8 other homes publishing a starting rate).

Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.

A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.

The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.

A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.

Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out. What Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver covers in a care home.

Does Gate Manor III take Medi-Cal?

On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home appears on the DHCS participation list, August 9, 2026. Confirm eligibility and current participation with the program. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.

Who holds the license?

The license is held by Health Gate Assisted Living LLC, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. See the homes licensed to Health Gate Assisted Living LLC — at least 3 on the state roster.

Is there a hospital nearby?

Palomar Ucsd Medical Center Poway is 3.1 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.

Can Gate Manor III keep a resident on hospice?

Hospice care is approved on this license, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Gate Manor III license and inspection record

  • Name on the license: “GATE MANOR III”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
  • License #374603449. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • Licensed for 6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • Licensed to Health Gate Assisted Living LLC, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • First licensed in 2014, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • 10 state inspection visits since 2014, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • 0 Type A and 0 Type B citations on file since 2014, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. The same records count 10 state visits in that period.
  • 2 complaints and 0 substantiated allegations on file since 2014, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
  • The most recent state visit on file is June 3, 2026, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
Type A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗

See the state’s own record

Can they support the care needed?

California licenses a home for specific kinds of care. The state’s record lists what this home is approved for; the home’s own answers fill in what changes as needs change.

  • Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved · covers up to 6 residents
  • Dementia / memory careApproved by the state
  • Hospice careApproved by the state
  • BedriddenApproved · covers up to 1 resident

State licensing record · September 27, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.

Read the state’s own wording
FACILITY SERVES 6 NON-AMBULATORY ELDERLY RESIDENTS; AGE 60 & ABOVE. 1 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN HOUSED IN BEDROOM #2 ONLY. FACILITY EQUIPPED WITH LOCKED PERIMETERS. HOSPICE CARE WAIVER WITH TOTAL CARE APPROVED FOR 4.

983 - RCFE / DEMENTIA

CDSS record, verbatim · September 27, 2026

As needs change

  • Staying through hospice

    Hospice waiver on file — care may continue at the end of life

    Ask: “If hospice is needed, can care continue here until the end?”

    State licensing record · September 27, 2026

  • If memory loss develops

    Dementia-care designation on file

    Ask: “Can we read the dementia care disclosure and discuss how daily support works?”

    State licensing record · September 27, 2026

3 more questions to ask the home
  • Two-person transfers or a lift

    Not on file

    Ask: “If two people or a lift are needed to transfer, can the person stay?”

  • Someone awake overnight

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?”

  • Medicines

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who manages the medicines, and what happens when a dose is missed?”

What it costs here

Covelight estimate

$4,900a month to start

Likely $4,050–$6,050

From 13 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file

Likely monthly total

$4,900a month

Likely $4,050–$6,200

With a shared room and basic help.

An estimate for planning, not a quote. The price is made in the phone call.

See the full cost breakdownRoom, care and fees · how people pay · how this estimate works
Room
Daily care
Sharing the room
  • Starting monthly rate$4,900likely $4,050–$6,050

    Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 13 small homes and similar homes within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

  • Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600

    Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (45 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).

  • One-time move-in fee$2,000one time · likely $0–$4,000

    Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,000 (134 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.

Likely monthly totalLikely $4,050–$6,200
$4,900
First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $4,700–$9,300
$6,900
How people payOn the Medi-Cal waiver list · private pay, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
  • Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
  • Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home appears on the DHCS participation list, August 9, 2026. Confirm eligibility and current participation with the program. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board. For a resident on SSI/SSP, California’s 2026 standard sends $1,444.07 a month to the home for room and board.
  • SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
  • VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
  • Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
  • MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
If the money runs out, what Medi-Cal covers
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
  • The care level

    Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.

  • What is billed separately

    Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.

  • Move-in costs

    A one-time community fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.

  • Increases

    California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.

  • What is the full monthly cost for the room and care we need, and what does it include?
  • What would the next care level cost, and who decides when it changes?
  • What is billed separately, and is there a one-time fee or deposit at move-in?
  • Is any private-pay period required before another payment program can begin?
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 13 small homes and similar homes within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

13 homes like this within 5 miles publish starting rates mostly between $4,000–$7,100.

  • Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
  • Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
  • Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
  • Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
  • We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
  • It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Show the 13 nearby homes behind this estimate
  • Parkview GardensPoway · 1.1 mi · Small home
    $7,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
  • Huntington HousePoway · 1.9 mi · Small home
    $4,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
  • Huntington ManorPoway · 1.9 mi · Mid-size home
    $6,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
  • Huntington ChateauPoway · 2.0 mi · Small home
    $7,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
  • Poway Elder CarePoway · 2.0 mi · Small home
    $7,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
  • Anabella HomecarePoway · 2.5 mi · Small home
    $4,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
  • Casa MahalPoway · 2.9 mi · Small home
    $3,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
  • Mount Carmel Assisted LivingSan Diego · 3.9 mi · Small home
    $6,800Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
  • Rb Senior ResidencesSan Diego · 4.0 mi · Small home
    $4,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
  • St Andrews SuitesPoway · 4.5 mi · Small home
    $4,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
  • Paseo Guest HomeSan Diego · 4.7 mi · Small home
    $4,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
  • The Sage Garden at Rancho BernardoSan Diego · 4.8 mi · Small home
    $5,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
  • Sage VillaSan Diego · 4.9 mi · Small home
    $5,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026

Where it is

  • 13114 Gate Drive, Poway, CA 92064Address from the public record · September 27, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.

Opening the neighborhood map…

The state record

California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. Here are the dated documents and the state’s own words, beside what is typical for homes this size.

Since 2022, the state has filed 11 documents for this home, and its records count 10 visits since 2014. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated June 3, 2026.

On file since
2022
State visits
10
Most recent visit
June 3, 2026
Occupied · October 3, 2025 visit
5 of 6 bedsa count on that day, not an opening

We hold 3 complaint reports the state published for this home, dated June 30, 2022 to October 3, 2025. 3 of the 3 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Unsubstantiated” (3). 3 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word. Summary composed by computer from the 3 complaint reports below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

Beside homes the same size

  • Type A citations0typical 0
  • Type B citations0typical 0
  • Substantiated allegations0typical 0
  • Total complaints2typical 0

“Typical” is the statewide median across the 6,808 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this licence since 2014.

Year by year
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated20264402025220202411020232202022220

The last 36 months — 8 of 11 documents

20264 state visits · 4 documents
Jun 3, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Office

An office meeting was held in the San Diego Adult and Senior Care Regional office. The following people were present at the meeting: RM Jerry Romero, LPM Simon Jacob, LPM Lizzette Tellez, LPA Angelica Boyles, Chuck Thomas and Suolang “Julie” Quzchen. The purpose of this meeting was to gather information regarding the operations of of Gate Manor, Gate Manor II, and Gate Manor III. Translation services approved by the Department were used during this office meeting. This report was mailed to Licensee, as licensee left.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 3, 2026
May 27, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Deficiencies

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Angelica Boyles made an unannounced Case Management visit to the facility in order to review facility records. LPA was welcomed by and discussed the purpose of the visit with Administrator Maniza Ambalada. LPA conducted a brief facility tour and reviewed staff and resident records. Staff records reviewed revealed that there were no personnel files for Staff #1 (S1). [See LIC811 Confidential Name List for a description of select person identifiers used in this report.] Records for Staff #2 (S2) did not include criminal record clearance. A review of the Guardian background check system revealed S2 had eligible background clearance, but was not associated to the facility. Additionally, Staff #3 (S3) did not have a Health Screening Report (LIC503) on file. Three deficiencies were cited per California Code of Regulations, Title 22 (refer to the attached LIC 809 D pages) and a Civil Penalty was assessed for the total of $500 (refer to attached LIC 421BG). A Plan of Correction was jointly developed with the Administrator. An exit interview was conducted with Administrator Maniza Ambalada, to whom a copy of this report, the LIC 809 D, LIC 421BG, and the Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC9058 03/22) were provided at the conclusion of the visit.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 27, 2026

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87412(a) · Plan of correction due date: Jun 26, 2026

87412 Personnel Records (a)The licensee shall ensure that personnel records are maintained on the licensee, administrator and each employee... This requirement is not met as evidenced by: LPA record review and interview with Administrator revealed that there were no personnel records for S1. This poses a potential health risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 27, 2026

Plan of correction: Administrator agreed to email LPA required personnel records for S1 by POC due date.

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR87412(a)(11) · Plan of correction due date: Jun 26, 2026

87412 Personnel Records (a) The licensee shall ensure that personnel records are maintained on...each employee. Each personnel record shall contain the following information: (11) A health screening... This requirement is not met as evidenced by: LPA record review and interview with Administrator revealed that S3 did not have a health screening report on file. This poses a potential health risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 27, 2026

Plan of correction: Administrator agreed to email LPA a copy of S3's Health Screening by POC due date.

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87355(e)(3) · Plan of correction due date: Jun 26, 2026

87355 Criminal Record Clearance(e) All individuals subject to a criminal record review ...shall prior to working...: (3) Request a transfer of a criminal record clearance... This requirement is not met as evidenced by: LPA record review and interview with Administrator revealed S2 was not associated to the facility prior to working. This poses an immediate health and safety risk to all persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 27, 2026

Plan of correction: Administrator will have S2 associated to the facility on Guardian and submit proof to LPA by POC due date.

Feb 27, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Annual Continuation

LPA Correia, accompanied by Administrator Ambalada, conducted a tour of the facility. Resident records were reviewed and found to be complete and up to date. The facility’s ambient temperature and hot water temperatures at sinks accessible to residents in care were measured and found to be within regulatory compliance. The facility maintained an adequate supply of food, including a 2‑day supply of perishable items and a 7‑day supply of non‑perishable items, all properly labeled and stored. During the tour, LPA observed operational smoke detectors, carbon monoxide detectors, and a fire extinguisher with a current inspection tag. Required postings were properly displayed, and a functional landline telephone was present. Sharps, toxins, and medications were locked and inaccessible to residents in care. Medications were reviewed and found to be administered as ordered, with documentation complete and accurate. The facility was clean, sanitary, and in good repair. Pathways were free of obstructions and slip hazards. Resident bedrooms contained the required furnishings. Resident showers were equipped with non‑skid flooring and grab bars and were in working order. Doors, windows, and screens were in good condition. Extra linens, hygiene supplies, and Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) were available. acknowledges receipt of these documents. The facility includes an adequately sized common area and a shaded outdoor space for activities and visitation. No bodies of water were present on the premises.. Per Administrator Ambalada, there are no firearms or ammunition on the premises. Based on the inspection conducted today, no deficiencies were cited. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report, along with Licensee Rights (LIC 9058, rev. 01/16), was provided to Administrator Ambalada. Their signature on this form acknowledges receipt of the documents.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 27, 2026
Feb 25, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Debbie Correia made an unannounced visit to the facility to conduct an annual licensing inspection. LPA identified herself to Administrator Ambalada of Gate Manor III, was granted entry, and explained the purpose of the visit. Gate Manor III is licensed to serve six (6) residents, all of whom may be non-ambulatory, four (4) may be receiving hospice services, and one (1) bedridden, During today’s visit, the current census was five (5) residents: three (3) receiving Hospice services, and two (2) non-ambulatory. The facility was operating within its licensed capacity and conditions. An overall inspection of the facility began today; however, due to time constraints, LPA was unable to complete the visit and will return at a later time to conduct the remaining portion of the inspection. No deficiencies were cited during today’s visit. This report was discussed with Administrator Ambalada. A copy of the report and Licensee Rights (01/2016) will be provided at the conclusion of the visit, and signature on this form acknowledges receipt of both the rights and this report.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 25, 2026
20252 state visits · 2 documents
Oct 3, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff do not ensure that resident's dietary needs are met.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Correia conducted an unannounced visit to commence and conclude a complaint investigation. LPA Correia was met by Administrator Ambalada, identified herself, and explained the purpose of the visit. During today’s visit LPA conducted staff, resident, and Outside Source interviews, a resident records review, and facility tour. On September 25, 2025, the Department received a complaint alleging that the Licensee was not providing Resident1 (R1) meals to meet their diabetic dietary needs, indicating the facility served mostly starchy food (i.e., white rice and white bread). A review of R1’s facility records revealed they were admitted to the facility on May 26, 2025, following the discharge of a Skilled Nursing Facility (SNF). Records also showed R1 was diagnosed with Diabetic Mellitus, Lumar Fusion, Dementia, HTN, Vertigo, BPH (Prostate), and Depression. Further review of records showed R1 required no special dietary needs. [Continued on LIC 9099C] Unsubstantiated [Continuation of LIC 9099] An interview with the facility Administrator revealed they offer options and/or substitutes when requested by residents in care, and at times will make special trips to Sprouts for R1. An interview conducted with Resident 2 (R2) revealed they had lived at the facility for approximately 9 months, and stated staff were very accommodating. R2 also disclosed they were diabetic as well and felt the meals were healthy. R2 disclosed the facility had a variety of food. An additional interview was conducted with Outside Source 1 (OS1) who revealed no complaints regarding the facility's care or food/meals offered at the facility. OS1 disclosed R1 tends to find things to complain about and did not agree with the allegation. LPA, accompanied by the facility Administrator, conducted a tour of the facility kitchen. LPA observed a variety of wheat bread, brown rice, and other non-starchy foods. The Administrator also showed LPA two (2) boxes of Raisin Bran that R1 requests for breakfast each morning. Based on interviews, record reviews, and facility tour, the above listed allegation was determined Unsubstantiated. This finding means the preponderance of evidence standard was not met. An exit interview was conducted with Administrator Ambalada and a copy of this report along with Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC 9058 03/22) will be provided at the conclusion of the visit. Signature below confirms receipt of the reports.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 3, 2025 · control 08-AS-20250925160917
Mar 6, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) David Roman conducted an unannounced Required Annual Inspection. The facility file was reviewed prior to the visit. LPA D. Roman was greeted and allowed entry into the facility by facility Director, Ma Niza Ambalada, to whom LPA discussed the purpose of today's visit. The facility’s license identifies that the facility has a maximum capacity of 6 elderly residents. During today’s inspection, 4 were at the facility. 2 bedrooms are empty. LPA D. Roman along with the Director, Ma Niza Ambalada toured the interior and exterior of the facility, and inspected each room. The facility was clean, sanitary, and one bathroom was undergoing maintenance repairs. Pathways were free of obstruction and slip hazards. Client bedrooms contained the required furnishings. Doors, windows, screens, toilets, and showers were in working order. The facility had sufficient space and equipment to facilitate dining, laundry, visitation, meetings, and client activities. The facility’s ambient internal temperature was comfortable. LPA D. Roman observed about 2 to 3 days of perishable food, and at least 7 days non-perishable food present, all safely stored, expiration dates were randomly checked. Cooking/dining equipment and utensils were present. There were no sharp objects, toxic chemicals/poisons, or open-faced heaters accessible to clients. Medications were labeled, as required, and stored in locked areas. No pools or bodies of water on the premises. LPA inquired if firearms were stored in the facility to which Director Ma Niza Ambalada, reported no. At 1:20PM, smoke alarms, carbon monoxide detectors were tested, emergency lighting, and facility telephone were all working. Most fire extinguishers have been replaced. However, the facility continued to have fire extinguishers present that were serviced in 2023. First aid kits were complete and readily accessible. Required licensing postings were observed in visible areas of the facility. LPA interviewed staff present. LPA reviewed staff and client records/files. Files reviewed contained required documents. No deficiencies were observed or cited during today's annual inspection. An exit interview was conducted with Director, Ma Niza Ambalada to whom copies of this report and the Licensee/Appeal Rights were provided at the conclusion of the visit.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 6, 2025

The state marks this report as 3 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 1. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.

20241 state visit · 1 document
Jan 23, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Tiffany Holmes conducted an unannounced Required Annual Inspection. The facility file was reviewed prior to the visit. LPA was greeted and allowed entry into the facility by Ma.Niza Ambalada, Administrator to whom LPA discussed the purpose of the visit. According to the facility’s license, the facility has a maximum capacity of six (6) elderly residents. During today’s inspection, six (6) were at the facility. LPA, accompanied by the Administrator, toured the interior and exterior of the facility, and inspected each room. The facility was clean, sanitary, and in good repair. Pathways were free of obstruction and slip hazards. Client bedrooms contained the required furnishings. Doors, windows, screens, toilets, and showers were in working order. Extra linens and hygiene supplies were present, as well as Personal Protective Equipment. The facility had sufficient space and equipment to facilitate dining, laundry, visitation, meetings, and client activities. The facility’s ambient internal temperature was comfortable. There was at least 2 days of perishable food, and at least 7 days non-perishable food present, all safely stored. Cooking/dining equipment and utensils were present. There were no sharp objects, toxic chemicals/poisons, or open-faced heaters accessible to clients. Medications were labeled, as required, and stored in locked areas. [CONTINUED ON LIC 809-C] [CONTINUED FROM LIC 809] No pools or bodies of water on the premises. Per Ma.Niza Ambalada, Administrator, no firearms or ammunition are kept at the facility. Smoke alarms, carbon monoxide detectors, emergency lighting, and facility telephone were all working. Fire extinguisher has been serviced. First aid kits were complete and readily accessible. Required licensing postings were observed in visible areas of the facility. LPA interviewed staff present. LPA reviewed multiple staff and client records/files. Files reviewed contained required documents. Confidential records were stored in locked areas. Administrator presented proof of current/active business liability insurance and surety bond. No deficiencies were observed or cited during today's annual inspection. An exit interview was conducted with Ma.Niza Ambalada, Administrator to whom copies of this report and the Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC9058 03/22) were provided at the conclusion of the visit.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 23, 2024
20231 state visit · 1 document
Oct 2, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility is in disrepair Staff did not keep the facility free from cockroaches

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Amy Rodgers and Licensig Program Manders (LPM) Denise Powell made an unannounced visit to the facility to conduct a Complaint Visit . LPA Rodgers and LPM Powell were met by Maniza Ambalada, Administrator, and were granted entry into facility. LPA met with Ms. Ambalanda and discussed the purpose of the visit. At 11:05 am LPA and LPM toured facility and interviewed staff. LPA inspected the kitchen cabinets and drawers including food pantry areas. LPA did not observe any dead or alive cockroaches. Record review confirmed facility has ongoing pest control services and has added interior roach control. Facility interior appeared clean and in overall good condition. LPA and LPM inspected water leak area located inside the staff office. Repairs were made timely and no evidence of current leak, dry rot, or mildew was observed. Unsubstantiated continued 9099 Based on observations and record reviews there is insufficient evidence to support the allegations. The allegations are determined as unsubstantiated meaning they could have happened or be true, there is not a preponderance of evidence to meet the standard. An exit interview was conducted with Maniza Ambalada, Administrator, and a copy of this report along with the licensee rights was provided. Administrator signature confirms receipt of these rights.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 2, 2023 · control 08-AS-20230922151751
What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedthere was not enough evidence to prove a violation occurred — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe evidence showed the allegation was false, could not have happened, or had no reasonable basisType A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗

An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents and the questions below stand in their place.

Who holds the licence

Health Gate Assisted Living LLC, licensed since 2014, operates 3 licensed homes in California. Running more than one home is common and is neither good nor bad on its own.

Life here

Rooms, meals, the rhythm of a day, faith and language, pets and house rules — as the home describes them. Tap any detail for its source and date; nothing here is graded.

The home has not described daily life anywhere we have reviewed yet — that is the case for most small homes, and it says nothing about the home. These questions fill in the picture; keep the ones that matter to you.

Before you call

Ask every home the same questions — the state’s record does not answer these. Keep the ones that matter and they travel with your saved homes.

  1. What is included in the monthly rate, and what costs extra?
  2. Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?
  3. Which rooms does the non-ambulatory approval cover, and what transfer support is provided?
  4. What could change whether someone can stay here?
  5. Can we see a bedroom and share a meal during a visit?

Other homes nearby

The nearest licensed homes in San Diego County, closest first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.

Explore San Diego County