Illustration — no photo of this home on file yet

Scarlet House for the Elderly

Small home·Licensed for 6·Concord, California

Licensed since 2023Licence #79201195
  • Care approvals on fileWheelchair · Dementia · HospiceState licensing record · September 27, 2026
  • Estimated starting rate$5,100 a monthCovelight estimate · likely $4,150–$6,300
  • Home sizeLicensed for 6Small care home · a licensed care home (RCFE)
  • Room at the last state visit2 of 6 beds occupiedFebruary 27, 2025 · not a current opening
  • Ways to payAsk the homeMedi-Cal ALW participation not on file
  • Last state visitFebruary 20, 2026CDSS inspection record

Scarlet House for the Elderly is a small care home in Concord — a licensed residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE), the licence category behind “assisted living” and “board and care.” It is licensed for 6 residents since 2023. Bedridden care is not on file.

Built from CDSS public records · September 27, 2026. Every fact below names its source and date.

Quick answers and the state record

A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

Quick answers about Scarlet House for the Elderly

Is Scarlet House for the Elderly licensed?

The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

How many residents is Scarlet House for the Elderly licensed for?

6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Has Scarlet House for the Elderly been cited?

1 Type A and 0 Type B citation since 2023, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. Those records count 9 state visits over the same years.

Is Scarlet House for the Elderly still open?

This license was on the CDSS roster as of September 28, 2026.

What does Scarlet House for the Elderly cost?

$5,100 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $4,150–$6,300. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 19 small homes within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

Among 10 other homes of a similar licensed size in Concord that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $3,800 to $5,000 a month, and the middle figure is $4,500 (n = 10 other homes publishing a starting rate).

Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.

A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.

The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.

A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.

Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.

Does Scarlet House for the Elderly take Medi-Cal?

On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.

Who holds the license?

The license is held by Legacy Care Homes, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Is there a hospital nearby?

John Muir Medical Center-Concord Campus is 4.1 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.

Can Scarlet House for the Elderly keep a resident on hospice?

Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 6 residents, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Scarlet House for the Elderly license and inspection record

  • Name on the license: “SCARLET HOUSE FOR THE ELDERLY”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
  • License #79201195. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • Licensed for 6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • Licensed to Legacy Care Homes, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • First licensed in 2023, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • 9 state inspection visits since 2023, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • 1 Type A and 0 Type B citation on file since 2023, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. The same records count 9 state visits in that period.
  • 1 complaint and 1 substantiated allegation on file since 2023, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
  • The most recent state visit on file is February 20, 2026, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
Type A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗

See the state’s own record

Can they support the care needed?

California licenses a home for specific kinds of care. The state’s record lists what this home is approved for; the home’s own answers fill in what changes as needs change.

  • Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved · covers up to 6 residents
  • Dementia / memory careApproved by the state
  • Hospice careApproved · covers up to 6 residents
  • BedriddenNot on file · ask the home

State licensing record · September 27, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.

Read the state’s own wording
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 6 NON-AMBULATORY. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 6.

983 - RCFE / DEMENTIA

CDSS record, verbatim · September 27, 2026

As needs change

  • Staying through hospice

    Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 6 — care may continue at the end of life

    Ask: “If hospice is needed, can care continue here until the end?”

    State licensing record · September 27, 2026

  • If memory loss develops

    Dementia-care designation on file

    Ask: “Can we read the dementia care disclosure and discuss how daily support works?”

    State licensing record · September 27, 2026

3 more questions to ask the home
  • Two-person transfers or a lift

    Not on file

    Ask: “If two people or a lift are needed to transfer, can the person stay?”

  • Someone awake overnight

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?”

  • Medicines

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who manages the medicines, and what happens when a dose is missed?”

What it costs here

Covelight estimate

$5,100a month to start

Likely $4,150–$6,300

From 19 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file

Likely monthly total

$5,100a month

Likely $4,150–$6,450

With a shared room and basic help.

An estimate for planning, not a quote. The price is made in the phone call.

See the full cost breakdownRoom, care and fees · how people pay · how this estimate works
Room
Daily care
Sharing the room
  • Starting monthly rate$5,100likely $4,150–$6,300

    Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 19 small homes within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

  • Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600

    Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (45 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).

  • One-time move-in fee$2,000one time · likely $0–$4,000

    Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,000 (134 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.

Likely monthly totalLikely $4,150–$6,450
$5,100
First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $4,850–$9,550
$7,100
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
  • Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
  • Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
  • SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
  • VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
  • Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
  • MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
If the money runs out, what Medi-Cal covers
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
  • The care level

    Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.

  • What is billed separately

    Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.

  • Move-in costs

    A one-time community fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.

  • Increases

    California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.

  • What is the full monthly cost for the room and care we need, and what does it include?
  • What would the next care level cost, and who decides when it changes?
  • What is billed separately, and is there a one-time fee or deposit at move-in?
  • Is any private-pay period required before another payment program can begin?
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 19 small homes within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

19 homes like this within 5 miles publish starting rates mostly between $3,400–$5,500.

  • Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
  • Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
  • Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
  • Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
  • We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
  • It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Show the 19 nearby homes behind this estimate

Where it is

  • 5111 Paul Scarlet Drive, Concord, CA 94521Address from the public record · September 27, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.

Opening the neighborhood map…

The state record

California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. Here are the dated documents and the state’s own words, beside what is typical for homes this size.

Since 2022, the state has filed 9 documents for this home, and its records count 9 visits since 2023. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated February 20, 2026.

On file since
2022
State visits
9
Most recent visit
February 20, 2026
Occupied · February 27, 2025 visit
2 of 6 bedsa count on that day, not an opening

We hold 2 complaint reports the state published for this home, dated February 27, 2025. 2 of the 2 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (1), “Unsubstantiated” (1). 2 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word. Summary composed by computer from the 2 complaint reports below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

Beside homes the same size

  • Type A citations1typical 0
  • Type B citations0typical 0
  • Substantiated allegations1typical 0
  • Total complaints1typical 0

“Typical” is the statewide median across the 6,808 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this licence since 2023.

Year by year
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated2026110202545120241102022220

The last 36 months — 7 of 9 documents

20261 state visit · 1 document
Feb 20, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

On 02/20/2026 at 8:30AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Andrew Christy arrived unannounced to conduct the 1-Year Annual Required inspection. LPA met with Administrator, Eli Ermintano, and explained the purpose of the visit. The facility currently houses three (3) residents with a max capacity of six (6) residents. LPA toured facility including but not limited to bedrooms, bathrooms, kitchen, common area and backyard. All outdoor and indoor passageways are kept free of obstruction. No bodies of water were observed. A comfortable indoor temperature is maintained at 72.0 degrees Fahrenheit. The hot water temperature in the residents’ shared bathroom was measured at 116.1 degrees Fahrenheit. LPA observed lighting in all rooms are adequate for the comfort and safety of the residents. Residents’ bathrooms are equipped with grab bars and non-skid mats. There is a minimum of one week supply of non-perishable and 2 day of perishable foods. Smoke detectors and carbon monoxide detectors were in operating condition during visit. Fire extinguisher was last serviced on 01/22/2025. At 10:00AM, LPA reviewed three (3) resident files and four (4) staff files, all found to be complete. The emergency disaster plan was last reviewed 10/01/2025. A review of resident medications and the Medication Administration Record (MAR) found no outstanding errors. Continued on LIC809C..... Continued from LIC809..... The following deficiencies were cited during the inspection: At 9:00AM, LPA observed a cabinet that was unlocked and found cleaning chemicals. At 9:30AM, LPA observed an non-locking cabinet in a bedroom that had cleaning chemicals. At 9:00AM, LPA observed an unlocked drawer with sharps such as knives and scissors. At 9:15AM, LPA observed the medication closet was unlocked. At 10:00AM, LPA observed all fire extinguishers in the facility have not been serviced in over a year. At 10:30AM, it was found that no quarterly emergency drills were being conducted in the facility. Deficiencies are cited per Title 22 California Code of Regulations and listed on LIC809D. Failure to submit proof of corrections (POC) by plan of correction due date and/or any repeat deficiencies within a 12-month period may result in civil penalties. Exit interview conducted. A copy of this report, along with appeal rights, was provided to the administrator.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 20, 2026
20254 state visits · 5 documents
Jun 13, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Other

On 6/13/25 at 1:30 p.m., Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Greg Clark arrived to deliver amended report and Civil Penalty for complaint #15-AS-20250131140127. LPA met with Administrator, Ace White and explained the purpose of the visit. Amended report delivered to administrator. No deficiencies cited during visit. Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 13, 2025
Feb 27, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff not properly trained. Staff did not meet the needs of the resident while in care.

On 2/27/25 at 10:30 a.m., Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Greg Clark arrived unannounced to conduct an initial 10-day complaint investigation and deliver findings in regard to the allegations above. LPA met with Ace White, Licensee and explained the purpose of the visit. At 2:00 p.m. Ace White had to leave and gave permission for care staff Jose Coronel to sign the reports. During the course of the investigation LPA interviewed W1 and facility staff. LPA also reviewed documents related to R1. Allegation: Staff not properly trained. Interviews with facility staff (S1, S2, S3 and S4) revealed that all staff reported received training from the facility’s Administrator on the specifics of each of the residents’ care plans. For R1 staff stated that they received training in the proper way to transfer R1 into her shower chair and into the shower stall. ***report continues on LIC9099C*** Unsubstantiated ***report continues from LIC9099*** Staff further stated that for the two and half years prior to the incident on 12/05/24 they hadn’t had any issues with transferring R1 into the shower. LPA reviewed staff training records which document that staff received training on the proper way to transfer/lift residents. Allegation: Staff did not meet the needs of the resident while in care. LPA interviewed W1 who stated that when R1 arrived at her new facility the facility staff reported to W1 that R1 and her belongings “had an odor” and had to be washed. W1 did not witness this herself. Interviews with facility staff (S1 and S2) revealed that for the 2 years R1 lived at the facility W1 never mentioned that she felt R1’s needs were not being met or that R1 had an odor. R1 left the facility due her level of care exceeding what the facility can provide. This agency has investigated the complaints alleging staff not properly trained and staff did not meet the needs of the resident while in care. We have found that the complaints are unsubstantiated. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. Exit interview conducted, a copy of this report provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 27, 2025 · control 15-AS-20250131140127
Feb 27, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff improperly transferred resident resulting in resident sustaining multiple fractures while in care

On 6/13/25 LPA arrived to deliver amened report. On 2/27/25 at 10:30 a.m., Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Greg Clark arrived unannounced to conduct an initial 10-day complaint investigationand deliver findings in regard to the allegation above. LPA met with Ace White, Licensee and explained the purpose of the visit. At 2:00 p.m. Ace White had to leave and gave permission for care staff Jose Coronel to sign the reports. During the course of the investigation LPA interviewed W1 and facility staff. LPA also reviewed documents related to R1. R1 was admitted to the facility on 3/4/23 and moved out on 1/30/25. R1 is non-ambulatory. R1's needs and services plan indicate that she needs a 2 -3 person assist for transfers and was identified as a fall risk. ***report contine on LIC9099C*** Substantiated ***report continues fron LIC9099*** On December 5, 2024, at around 11:00 a.m. S2 and S3 were assisting R1 into the shower stall in a shower chair when R1’s leg got caught between the shower chair and shower wall after which R1 started complaining of pain in her leg. Facility staff were all instructed to call R1’s Responsible Party (RP) before seeking any medical attention for R1. S2 called R1’s RP who advised staff to call 911. R1 was taken to Kaiser Walnut Creek and diagnosed with a fractured right tibia. Interviews with S2 and S3 confirmed that the injury was an accident and that they never had any trouble moving R1 into the shower prior that incident. Review of medical records from Kaiser Walnut Creek indicate that R1 did sustain a fracture of her right tibia. Based on LPA document review and interviews which were conducted, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. California Code of Regulations (Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8), are being cited on the attached LIC 9099D. A $500.00 immediate civil penalty is assessed on this day. Civil penalty determination related to serious bodily injury is pending.” Exit interview conducted, a copy of this report and appeal rights provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 27, 2025 · control 15-AS-20250131140127

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87464(f)(1)(c) · Plan of correction due date: Feb 27, 2025

87464 Basic Services (f)Basic services shall at a minimum include: (1)Care and supervision…. (c) "Care and supervision" means the facility assumes responsibility for...assistance with activities of daily living without which the resident’s physical health, mental health, safety, or welfare would be endangered. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on observation the licensee did not comply with the section cited above. Staff injured a resident while assisting her into the shower which poses an immediate health, safety, or personal rights risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 27, 2025

Plan of correction: Administrator to re-train staff in the proper way to transport R1 into her shower chair and into the shower and send proff to CCL by POC date. POC cleared during visit.

Feb 12, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

On 2/12/2025 at 9:20 AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) D. Doidge arrived to conduct an unannounced 1-Year Required inspection. LPA met with Carrene Coronel and Jose Coronel, Caregivers, and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA toured the facility with Caregivers including but not limited to bedrooms, bathrooms, kitchen, common area, and back and side yard. The facility consists of six (6) bedrooms and three (3) bathrooms. A comfortable temperature of 72 degrees Fahrenheit is maintained. LPA observed lighting in all rooms are adequate for the comfort and safety of the residents. The hot water temperature in the residents’ shared bathroom was measured at 114 degrees Fahrenheit. Residents’ bathrooms are equipped with grab bars and non-skid mats. Smoke detectors and carbon monoxide were in operating condition during visit. Fire extinguisher was last serviced on 01/22/2025. Emergency Disaster Plan was posted. First aid kit was observed to be complete. LPA reviewed two (2) resident files and three (3) staff files, all were complete. Continued on LIC809C. Continue from LIC 809 LPA requested the following documents to be submitted to CCLD by 2/19/2025. · Resident Roster · LIC 308 Designation of Administrative Responsibility · LIC 309 Administrative Organization · LIC 500 Personnel Report · LIC 610E Emergency Disaster Plan (9 pages) · Liability Insurance No deficiencies observed or cited during this visit. . Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 12, 2025
Feb 3, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Health Checks

On 2/3/2025 at 4:55pm, Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs), L. Hall and C. Fowler arrived unannounced to conduct a health and safety check. LPAs met with Josielyn Ranosa, Caregiver and explained the reason for the visit. LPA L. Hall spoke with Licensee, Ace White, via telephone. Upon arrival at 2:40pm, LPAs observed one (1) client in his bedroom and one (1) staff (S2). Two more staff (S3 and S4) arrived at 10 minuets after arrival. During the health and safety check, LPA toured the facility including but not limited to common areas, bathrooms, bedrooms and outdoor common area. LPA observed R1 sitting in bedroom watching television and R2 sitting in recliner in bedroom reading. The facility is noted to be clean, in good repair, and clients in care appear to be safe. There is a minimum of 7-day non-perishables and 2-day perishables foods. There are no imminent health/safety concerns on today's date. During visit LPAs observed the following deficiencies: At 2:45pm, LPAs were not allowed inside the premises by S2. At 3:36pm, LPA observed a ramp and two shower doors in the closet of R2's bedroom. Continued on LIC809C. Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report provided. Continued from LIC809. At 3:40pm, LPA observed a insect trap sitting on kitchen counter and in kitchen drawer. At 3:48pm, LPA observed two commodes, a walker, a wheelchair, a ramp, a laundry basket, and wheel barrel in back yard. At 3:48pm, LPA observed storage shed was unlocked and contained paint, a shovel, and a rake. At 3:55pm, LPA observed fire extinguisher last services on 11/7/2023. *An immediate civil penalty of $500.00 will be assessed on today's day for inspection authority* Deficiencies are cited per Title 22 California Code of Regulations and listed on LIC809D. Failure to submit proof of corrections (POC) by plan of correction due date and/or any repeat deficiencies within a 12-month period may result in civil penalties. Exit interview conducted. A copy of the appeal rights, LIC421M, and this report provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 3, 2025

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87755(a) · Plan of correction due date: Feb 4, 2025

(a) Any duly authorized officer, employee or agent of the licensing agency may, upon proper identification and upon stating the purpose of his/her visit, enter and inspect the entire premise... with or without advance notice. This requirement was not met as evidence by: Based on observation the Licensee did not comply with the section cited above in letting the LPAs enter the facility, which poses a potential health and safety risk to person in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 3, 2025

Plan of correction: Caregiver opened the door and let LPAs inside the premise after 10 minuets. Deficiency cleared during visit. *A civil penalty of $500.00 was assessed date*

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR87307(a) · Plan of correction due date: Feb 10, 2025

(a) Living accommodations and grounds shall be related to the facility's function. The facility shall be large enough to provide comfortable living accommodations and privacy for the residents... The following provisions shall apply: This requirement was not met as evidence by: Based on observation and interview the Licensee did not comply with the section cited above in using R2's bedroom closet for R2's personal belongings, which poses a potential health and safety risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 3, 2025

Plan of correction: Licensee agreed to remove ramp and closet doors and submit photo to CCLD by POC date.

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87555(b)(27) · Plan of correction due date: Feb 10, 2025

(b) The following food service requirements shall apply: (27) All kitchen areas shall be kept clean and free of litter, rodents, vermin and insects. Based on observation the Licensee did not comply with the section cited above in keeping kitchen free of insects which poses a potential health and safety risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 3, 2025

Plan of correction: Licensee agreed to hire an exterminator and submit invoice to CCLD by POC date.

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR87307(d)(6) · Plan of correction due date: Feb 10, 2025

(d) The following space and safety provisions shall apply to all facilities: (6) All outdoor and indoor passageways and stairways shall be kept free of obstruction. This requirement was not met as evidence by: Based on observation the Licensee did not comply with the section cited above in having the back yard shed locked, a wheel chair, walker, commode, etc put away, which poses a potential health and safety risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 3, 2025

Plan of correction: The Licensee agreed to remove items, lock shed, and submit photo to CCLD by POC date.

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87203 · Plan of correction due date: Feb 10, 2025

87203 Fire Safety All facilities shall be maintained in conformity with the regulations adopted by the State Fire Marshal for the protection of life and property against fire and panic. This requirement was not met as evidence by: Based on observation the Licensee did not comply with the section cited above in having the fire extinguisher serviced to meet the regulations, which poses a potential health and safety risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 3, 2025

Plan of correction: Licensee agreed to have fire extinguishers services and submit photo to CCLD by POC date.

20241 state visit · 1 document
Feb 22, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

On 2/22/2024 at 2:00PM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) C. Fowler conducted an unannounced 1-Year Required inspection. LPA met with Carrene Coronel and Jose Coronel Caregivers, and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA spoke to Administrator Rachel White via phone she currently holds a certificate (#6055660740) that expired on 11/01/2024. LPA toured the facility with Caregiver including but not limited to bedrooms, bathrooms, kitchen, common area, and back and side yard. The facility consists of six (6) total and three (3) bathrooms. A comfortable temperature is maintained. LPA observed lighting in all rooms are adequate for the comfort and safety of the residents. The hot water temperature in the residents’ shared bathroom was measured at 114.7 degrees Fahrenheit. Residents’ bathrooms are equipped with grab bars and non-skid mats. Smoke detectors and carbon monoxide were in operating condition during visit. Fire extinguisher was last serviced on 11/07/2023. Emergency Disaster Plan was posted. First aid kit was observed to be complete. LPA reviewed 4 staff file which were complete and 4 resident files incomplete. Continued on LIC809C. continue from LIC 809 LPA observed the following deficiencies: · At 2:05pm, LPA observed staff not associated to the facility. · At 2:10pm, LPA observed not enough food. · At 2:15pm, LPA observed no current fire or disaster drill. At 2:20pm, LPA observed all resident records are missing appraisal needs and service plans. (ANS) LPA requested the following documents to be submitted to CCLD by 2/29/2024. · Resident Roster · LIC 308 Designation of Administrative Responsibility · LIC 309 Administrative Organization · LIC 500 Personnel Report · LIC 610E Emergency Disaster Plan (9 pages) · Liability Insurance Deficiency is cited per Title 22 California Code of Regulations and listed on Lic 809D. Exit interview conducted; Appeal Rights provided/the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 22, 2024
What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedthere was not enough evidence to prove a violation occurred — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe evidence showed the allegation was false, could not have happened, or had no reasonable basisType A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗

An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents and the questions below stand in their place.

Life here

Rooms, meals, the rhythm of a day, faith and language, pets and house rules — as the home describes them. Tap any detail for its source and date; nothing here is graded.

The home has not described daily life anywhere we have reviewed yet — that is the case for most small homes, and it says nothing about the home. These questions fill in the picture; keep the ones that matter to you.

Before you call

Ask every home the same questions — the state’s record does not answer these. Keep the ones that matter and they travel with your saved homes.

  1. What is included in the monthly rate, and what costs extra?
  2. Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?
  3. Which rooms does the non-ambulatory approval cover, and what transfer support is provided?
  4. What could change whether someone can stay here?
  5. Can we see a bedroom and share a meal during a visit?

Other homes nearby

The nearest licensed homes in Contra Costa County, closest first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.

Explore Contra Costa County