Illustration — no photo of this home on file yet

Royal Senior Living

Small home·Licensed for 6·Laguna Niguel, California

Licensed since 2021Licence #306006089Medi-Cal ALW
  • Care approvals on fileWheelchair · Dementia · Hospice · BedriddenState licensing record · September 13, 2026
  • Estimated starting rate$5,500 a monthCovelight estimate · likely $4,500–$6,800
  • Home sizeLicensed for 6Small care home · a licensed care home (RCFE)
  • Room at the last state visit6 of 6 beds occupiedFebruary 4, 2026 · not a current opening
  • Ways to payMedi-Cal ALW acceptedDHCS participant list · September 23, 2026
  • Last state visitFebruary 4, 2026CDSS inspection record
  • Licence holderRoyal Senior Living - Oc LLCSince 2021 · 2 licensed homes

Royal Senior Living is a small care home in Laguna Niguel — a licensed residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE), the licence category behind “assisted living” and “board and care.” It is licensed for 6 residents since 2021.

Built from CDSS public records · September 13, 2026. Every fact below names its source and date.

Quick answers and the state record

A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

Quick answers about Royal Senior Living

Is Royal Senior Living licensed?

The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

How many residents is Royal Senior Living licensed for?

6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

Has Royal Senior Living been cited?

3 Type A and 1 Type B citations since 2021, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. Those records count 9 state visits over the same years.

Is Royal Senior Living still open?

This license was on the CDSS roster as of September 28, 2026.

What does Royal Senior Living cost?

$5,500 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $4,500–$6,800. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 9 small homes within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

Among 7 other homes of a similar licensed size in Laguna Niguel that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $4,688 to $7,500 a month, and the middle figure is $5,500 (n = 7 other homes publishing a starting rate).

Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.

A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.

The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.

A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.

Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out. What Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver covers in a care home.

Does Royal Senior Living take Medi-Cal?

On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home appears on the DHCS participation list, September 23, 2026. Confirm eligibility and current participation with the program. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.

Who holds the license?

The license is held by Royal Senior Living - Oc LLC, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. See the homes licensed to Royal Senior Living - Oc LLC — at least 2 on the state roster.

Is there a hospital nearby?

Providence Mission Hospital - Laguna Beach is 1.1 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.

Can Royal Senior Living keep a resident on hospice?

Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 4 residents, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

Royal Senior Living license and inspection record

  • Name on the license: “ROYAL SENIOR LIVING”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
  • License #306006089. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • Licensed for 6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • Licensed to Royal Senior Living - Oc LLC, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • First licensed in 2021, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • 9 state inspection visits since 2021, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • 3 Type A and 1 Type B citations on file since 2021, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. The same records count 9 state visits in that period.
  • 2 complaints and 3 substantiated allegations on file since 2021, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
  • The most recent state visit on file is February 4, 2026, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
Type A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗

See the state’s own record

Can they support the care needed?

California licenses a home for specific kinds of care. The state’s record lists what this home is approved for; the home’s own answers fill in what changes as needs change.

  • Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved · covers up to 5 residents
  • Dementia / memory careApproved by the state
  • Hospice careApproved · covers up to 4 residents
  • BedriddenApproved by the state

State licensing record · September 13, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.

Read the state’s own wording
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. FIRE CLEARANCE APPROVED FOR FIVE (5) NON-AMBULATORY IN ROOM # 1, 2, 4, AND 5. ONE (1) BEDRIDDEN IN ROOM #3. HOSPICE WAIVER APPROVED FOR FOUR (4) HOSPICE RESIDENTS.

935 - ELDERLY · 983 - RCFE / DEMENTIA · 985 - RCFE / HOSPICE

CDSS record, verbatim · September 13, 2026

As needs change

  • Staying through hospice

    Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 4 — care may continue at the end of life

    Ask: “If hospice is needed, can care continue here until the end?”

    State licensing record · September 13, 2026

  • If memory loss develops

    Dementia-care designation on file

    Ask: “Can we read the dementia care disclosure and discuss how daily support works?”

    State licensing record · September 13, 2026

3 more questions to ask the home
  • Two-person transfers or a lift

    Not on file

    Ask: “If two people or a lift are needed to transfer, can the person stay?”

  • Someone awake overnight

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?”

  • Medicines

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who manages the medicines, and what happens when a dose is missed?”

What it costs here

Covelight estimate

$5,500a month to start

Likely $4,500–$6,800

From 9 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file

Likely monthly total

$5,500a month

Likely $4,500–$6,950

With a shared room and basic help.

An estimate for planning, not a quote. The price is made in the phone call.

See the full cost breakdownRoom, care and fees · how people pay · how this estimate works
Room
Daily care
Sharing the room
  • Starting monthly rate$5,500likely $4,500–$6,800

    Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 9 small homes within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

  • Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600

    Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (45 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).

  • One-time move-in fee$2,000one time · likely $0–$4,000

    Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,000 (134 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.

Likely monthly totalLikely $4,500–$6,950
$5,500
First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $5,250–$10,000
$7,500
How people payOn the Medi-Cal waiver list · private pay, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
  • Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
  • Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home appears on the DHCS participation list, September 23, 2026. Confirm eligibility and current participation with the program. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board. For a resident on SSI/SSP, California’s 2026 standard sends $1,444.07 a month to the home for room and board.
  • SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
  • VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
  • Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
  • MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
If the money runs out, what Medi-Cal covers
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
  • The care level

    Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.

  • What is billed separately

    Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.

  • Move-in costs

    A one-time community fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.

  • Increases

    California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.

  • What is the full monthly cost for the room and care we need, and what does it include?
  • What would the next care level cost, and who decides when it changes?
  • What is billed separately, and is there a one-time fee or deposit at move-in?
  • Is any private-pay period required before another payment program can begin?
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 9 small homes within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

9 homes like this within 5 miles publish starting rates mostly between $4,500–$8,250.

  • Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
  • Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
  • Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
  • Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
  • We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
  • It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Show the 9 nearby homes behind this estimate

Where it is

  • 31742 Isle Royal Dr., Laguna Niguel, CA 92677Address from the public record · September 13, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.

Opening the neighborhood map…

The state record

California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. Here are the dated documents and the state’s own words, beside what is typical for homes this size.

Since 2021, the state has filed 8 documents for this home, and its records count 9 visits since 2021. The most recent — a complaint investigation report on February 4, 2026 — closed with the state’s outcome word: “Substantiated.”

On file since
2021
State visits
9
Most recent visit
February 4, 2026
Occupied at that visit
6 of 6 bedsa count on that day, not an opening

We hold 2 complaint reports the state published for this home, dated October 31, 2025 to February 4, 2026. 2 of the 2 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (2). 2 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word. Summary composed by computer from the 2 complaint reports below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

Beside homes the same size

  • Type A citations3typical 0
  • Type B citations1typical 0
  • Substantiated allegations3typical 0
  • Total complaints2typical 0

“Typical” is the statewide median across the 6,808 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this licence since 2021.

Year by year
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated20261112025231202411020221102021220

The last 36 months — 5 of 8 documents

20261 state visit · 1 document
Feb 4, 2026Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Resident is left in a soiled diaper for an extended period sustaining lesions. Resident did not receive medical care in a timely manner sustaining in unstageable wounds.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Joseph Alejandre made an unannounced visit to deliver the findings of the complaint investigation into the allegations listed above. LPA met with staff member Queeny Sabobo and explained the reason for the visit. The investigation into the allegation, Resident did not receive medical care in a timely manner sustaining in unstageable wounds, revealed the following. Resident 1 (R1) moved into the facility on January 7, 2017. No issues or concerns were reported for R1 until November 19, 2022. According to R1’s physician's report dated October 14, 2022, R1 was diagnosed with Alzheimer’s disease, chronic atrial fibrillation and hypertension. R1's physician's report did not list any pressure injuries or skin issues. Staff reported that on November 18, 2022, R1 was noted to have a possible pressure injury on their heel. A medical assessment was ordered on November 18, 2022. On November 19, 2022, R1 had a home health assessment and was diagnosed with a stage 3 pressure injury on their left heel. 3 out of 3 staff interviewed could not explain how R1 developed a stage 3 pressure injury on their heel from October 14, 2022, to November 19, 2022. Substantiated There are no facility records or home health records for the time period from October 14 to November 17, 2022. It is unclear how R1 developed a stage 3 pressure injury in that time but staff should have been aware of the injury before it developed to a stage 3 injury which required wound care. Home health was ordered for R1 and wound care provided to R1 beginning November 19, 2022. Based on the evidence gathered the preponderance of evidence standard has been met therefore the allegation is substantiated. The investigation into the allegation, Resident is left in a soiled diaper for an extended period sustaining lesions, revealed the following. It was reported that Resident 1 (R1) sustained a pressure injury on their buttock. R1’s physician report dated October 14, 2022, did not have any mention of pressure injuries or skin issues. A review of hospice records shows that R1 was diagnosed with a stage 3 pressure injury on their left heel on November 19, 2022. R1 was diagnosed with stage 2 pressure injury on their coccyx on December 17, 2022. 1 out of 3 staff interviewed reported that R1 was regularly put in 2 briefs because they couldn’t always be changed quickly. Staff 1 reported that this practice was stopped because hospice requested them to stop. R1 was not always changed timely and developed a new pressure injury around a month after their first pressure injury was diagnosed. Based on the evidence gathered the preponderance of evidence standard has been met therefore the allegation is substantiated. Deficiencies are being cited per Title 22 Division 6 of the California Code of Regulations. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of the report along with appeal rights was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 4, 2026 · control 22-AS-20230106144959

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87465(a)(1) · Plan of correction due date: Feb 5, 2026

Incidental medical and dental care 87465(a)(1) The licensee shall arrange, or assist in arranging, for medical and dental care appropriate to the conditions and needs of residents. This requirement was not met as evidence by: R1 was diagnosed with a stage 3 pressure injury on November 19, 2022. Staff did not notice or seek assistance until the injury was stage 3. This poses an immediate health and safety risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 4, 2026

Plan of correction: Licensee agrees to train staff on CCR 87465 and to submit proof of training to LPA. Licensee agrees to sign a statement of understanding, stating that they have read and understand CCR 87465.

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87464(f)(1) · Plan of correction due date: Feb 11, 2026

(f) Basic services shall at a minimum include: (1) Care and supervision as defined in Section 87101(c)(3) and Health and Safety Code section 1569.2(c). This requirement was not met as evidence by: R1 was not changed timely which resulted in R1 sustaining a stage 2 pressure injury on their coccyx. This poses a potential health and safety risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 4, 2026

Plan of correction: Licensee agrees to train staff on CCR 87464 and to submit proof of training to LPA. Licensee agrees to sign a statement of understanding, stating that they have read and understand CCR 87465.

20252 state visits · 3 documents
Dec 12, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Alvaro Ramirez, Jr. conducted an unannounced visit for the Required 1 Year Inspection. LPA explained the purpose of today’s visit, and was greeted and granted entry by Caregiver Elma Parohinog. Administrator (AD) Ashkan Bastani was notified via telephone by staff. For today’s visit, LPA observed a total of six residents in care and two staff members on duty. LPA observed the Administrator's Certificate for facility AD Ashkan Bastani which expires on October 22, 2027. LPA Ramirez toured the interior and exterior portions of the facility with Caregiver Parohinog. The facility is a one-story home and is licensed for five non-ambulatory clients and one bedridden. The facility has a Hospice waiver for four. There are a total of five bedrooms of which four are for residents and one for staff. LPA Ramirez toured each bedroom in the facility and observed that bedrooms were provided with furniture in good repair, clean linens, adequate storage space, and kept free of tripping hazards. LPA observed all windows were screened. Smoke and carbon monoxide detector and auditory exit alarms were tested and operational. There are a total of two restrooms. Restrooms were observed to be in good repair, toilets were operational, and grab bars and non-skid floor mats were provided. Water temperature tested between 107.8-109.9 degrees Fahrenheit. Food menu was also posted and visible. LPA observed the facility has a 2-day supply of perishables and a 7-day supply of non-perishable food as required by regulations. Fire extinguisher was observed to be fully charged and mounted by the kitchen. Gas stove, microwave, washer, and dryer were all inspected and observed to be operable. CONTINUED ON LIC809-C.. LPA Ramirez observed the emergency disaster and evacuation plan, which is located by hallway next to the kitchen. Facility had back-up emergency food and water supply. LPA observed that First Aid Kit had all the required components. LPA observed that medications and toxins were locked and inaccessible to residents in care. For the exterior portion, LPA Ramirez observed a shaded area, patio furniture, and the grounds were free of any hazards. There are two gates in the backyard. No bodies of water were observed. LPA reviewed six of six resident files and four staff files. LPA interviewed six residents and two staff. During today's visit LPA observed clients' having chicken with vegetables and/or salad for lunch. For today's visit no deficiencies were issued per Title 22 Division 6 of the California Code of Regulations. An exit interview was conducted with facility representative. A copy of this report was provided at the time of exit.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 12, 2025
Oct 31, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff is not criminal record cleared

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Joseph Alejandre made an unannounced visit to conduct the required 10-day visit to begin the investigation into the allegations listed above. LPA met with Administrator Ashkan Bastani and explained the reason for the visit. LPA toured the facility. LPA interviewed staff and residents. LPA reviewed facility records, staff records and the facility roster in Guardian background check system. The investigation into the allegation revealed the following. Facilty has 5 regular staff and 2 private caregivers who are employed by the families of Resident 1 and Resident 2. The 2 private caregivers (Staff 6 and Staff 7) both reported they do not work for an Agency and are employed directly by the families of the residents. Staff 1 and Staff 2 are background cleared and associated to the facility. The Administrator is associated to the facility. Staff 3, Staff 4 and Staff 5 are not associated to the facilty. Staff 3, Staff 4 and Staff 5 were not present at the facility during the visit. Staff 1, Staff 6 and Staff 7 were present at the facility when the LPA arrived. LPA observed both Staff 6 and Staff 7 leave the facility. Substantiated Based on the evidence gathered the allegation is deemed unsubstantiated. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is no preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of the report provided. Based on the evidence gathered the preponderance of evidence standard has been met therefore the allegation is substantiated. Deficiencies are being cited per Title 22 Division 6 of the California Code of Regulations. Immediate civil penalties are being issued. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of the report along with appeal rights was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 31, 2025 · control 22-AS-20251030090606

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87355(e)(2) · Plan of correction due date: Nov 1, 2025

87355(e)(2) All individuals subject to a criminal record review...(b) shall prior to working, residing or volunteering in a licensed facility: Obtain a California clearance or a criminal record exemption as required by the Department… This requirement was not met evidenced by: Based on a record review Staff 6 does not have a California clearance or a as required by the Department. This poses an immediate health, safety and personal rights risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 31, 2025

Plan of correction: Licensee agrees to have all staff background cleared/trasnferred and associated to the facility before allowing any staff to work at the facility. Licensee agrees to sign a statement of understanding of CCR 87355 and to provide the signed statement by the POC due date.

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87355(e)(3) · Plan of correction due date: Nov 1, 2025

87355 (e)(3) All individuals subject to a criminal record review... (b) shall prior to working, residing or volunteering in a licensed facility: (3)Request a transfer of a criminal record clearance... This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on a record review Staff 7 does not have a transfer of their criminal record clearance as required by the Department. This poses an immediate health, safety and personal rights risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 31, 2025

Plan of correction: Licensee agrees to have all staff background cleared/transferred and associated to the facility before allowing any staff to work at the facility. Licensee agrees to sign a statement of understanding of CCR 87355 and to provide the signed statement by the POC due date.

Oct 31, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Other

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Joseph Alejandre made an unannounced visit to conduct a case management visit. LPA met with Administrator Ashkan Bastani and explained the reason for the visit. During the investigation of complaint # 22-AS-20251030090606 it was discovered that Resident 2 suffered a fall and was taken to the hospital to be treated. The facility Administrator notified the family of Resident 2 but did not report the incident to the Agency (Community Care Licensing). This is a violation of Title 22, California Code of Regulation (CCR) 87211 which states, "(a) Each licensee shall furnish to the licensing agency such reports as the Department may require, including, but not limited to, the following: (1)(D) Any incident which threatens the welfare, safety or health of any resident, such as psychological abuse of a resident by staff or other residents, or unexplained absence of any resident." LPA consulted with Administrator concerning reporting requirements. Deficiencies are being cited per Title 22 Division 6 of the California Code of Regulations. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of the report provided along with appeal rights.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 31, 2025

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87211(a)(1)(D) · Plan of correction due date: Nov 7, 2025

a) Each licensee shall furnish to the licensing agency such reports... (1)(D) Any incident which threatens the welfare, safety or health of any resident, such as psychological abuse of a resident by staff or other residents, or unexplained absence of any resident. This requirement is not being met as evidenced by, Resident 2 suffered a fall on October 15, 2025 which required the resident to be treated at the hospital and the facility did not report the incident to the Agency (Community Care Licensing). This poses a potential health, safety and personal rights risks to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 31, 2025

Plan of correction: Licensing agrees to report all incidents in compliance with CCR 87211 and to sign a statement of understanding stating they have read and understand CCR 87211. Licensee to submit proof to LPA by POC due date.

20241 state visit · 1 document
Dec 17, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Joseph Alejandre made an unannounced visit to conduct the required annual inspection. LPA met with Administrator Ashkan Bastani and explained the reason for the visit. The Administrator's certificate expires on October 22, 2025. Facility is licensed for a capacity of 6 non-ambulatory residents of which one can be bedridden and hospice waiver for 4. Facility is a singe story home with 5 bedrooms (1 is for staff), 2 bathrooms, kitchen, living room, dining room and a two car garage. The garage is kept locked and used for storage. Facility is operating within it's license. LPA observed the fireplace in the living room is screened. LPA observed the See Something Say Something Poster posted in the hallway next to the front door. LPA observed the kitchen is clean and organized. The 5 burner gas stove lights unassisted. LPA observed the cleaning supplies are kept locked under the kitchen sink and knives are kept locked in a kitchen drawer. The fire extinguisher in the kitchen is fully charged. Medication is kept locked in a cabinet in the hallway. LPA observed a clean linen supply in the hall closet. LPA observed all resident rooms had the required furnishings. LPA observed both bathrooms are clean and operational. Hot water measured 120.0 degrees Fahrenheit in both bathrooms. LPA observed Resident 1 (R1) had a bed rail on their bed but did not have a doctor's order for a bed rail. LPA observed the backyard had a table with chairs and an umbrella to sit outside. No bodies of water observed in the backyard. Both exit gates are operational. No obstacles or hazards observed in the backyard. LPA reviewed resident files and medications. LPA observed 5 out of the 6 resident files had no discrepancies. Resident 1 had a bed rail but no doctor's order for a bed rail. Smoke detectors/carbon monoxide detectors were tested. There is a smoke detector in each hallway on both sides of the house, both smoke detectors (2) in the hallways were not operational. All smoke detectors in the living room and in each bedroom are operational. During the visit the batteries were changed in the 2 smoke detectors in the hallways and both hallway smoke detectors are now operational. LPA reviewed 2 staff files, there was no documentation for any current training for both staff members. LPA observed Staff 1 had current CPR/First aid training. The last fire drill was conducted on November 10, 2024. The first aid kit has ll the required elements. Facility has a dedicated internet device for resident use. Deficiencies are being cited per Title 22 Division 6 of the California Code of Regulations. A civil penalty was issued on this date. An exit interview was conducted with the Administrator and a copy of the report along with appeal rights and LIC 421IM (civil penalty) was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 17, 2024

The state marks this report as 6 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 5. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedthere was not enough evidence to prove a violation occurred — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe evidence showed the allegation was false, could not have happened, or had no reasonable basisType A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗

An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents and the questions below stand in their place.

Who holds the licence

Royal Senior Living - Oc LLC, licensed since 2021, operates 2 licensed homes in California. Running more than one home is common and is neither good nor bad on its own.

Life here

Rooms, meals, the rhythm of a day, faith and language, pets and house rules — as the home describes them. Tap any detail for its source and date; nothing here is graded.

The home has not described daily life anywhere we have reviewed yet — that is the case for most small homes, and it says nothing about the home. These questions fill in the picture; keep the ones that matter to you.

Before you call

Ask every home the same questions — the state’s record does not answer these. Keep the ones that matter and they travel with your saved homes.

  1. What is included in the monthly rate, and what costs extra?
  2. Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?
  3. Which rooms does the non-ambulatory approval cover, and what transfer support is provided?
  4. What could change whether someone can stay here?
  5. Can we see a bedroom and share a meal during a visit?

Other homes nearby

The nearest licensed homes in Orange County, closest first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.

Explore Orange County