Illustration — no photo of this home on file yet

Aegis Assisted Living of Laguna Niguel

Large community·Licensed for 96·Laguna Niguel, California

Licensed since 2008Licence #306003905
  • Care approvals on fileWheelchair · Hospice · BedriddenState licensing record · September 13, 2026
  • Estimated starting rate$5,200 a monthCovelight estimate · likely $4,050–$6,600
  • Home sizeLicensed for 96Large care community · a licensed care home (RCFE)
  • Room at the last state visit71 of 96 beds occupiedOctober 9, 2025 · not a current opening
  • Ways to payAsk the homeMedi-Cal ALW participation not on file
  • Last state visitAugust 18, 2026CDSS inspection record
  • Licence holderAegis Senior Communities, LLCSince 2008 · 4 licensed homes

Aegis Assisted Living of Laguna Niguel is a large care community in Laguna Niguel — a licensed residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE), the licence category behind “assisted living” and “board and care.” It is licensed for 96 residents since 2008. Dementia care is not on file.

Built from CDSS public records · September 13, 2026. Every fact below names its source and date.

Quick answers and the state record

A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

Quick answers about Aegis Assisted Living of Laguna Niguel

Is Aegis Assisted Living of Laguna Niguel licensed?

The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

How many residents is Aegis Assisted Living of Laguna Niguel licensed for?

96 residents — a large community, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

Has Aegis Assisted Living of Laguna Niguel been cited?

0 Type A and 1 Type B citation since 2008, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. Those records count 12 state visits over the same years.

Is Aegis Assisted Living of Laguna Niguel still open?

This license was on the CDSS roster as of September 28, 2026.

What does Aegis Assisted Living of Laguna Niguel cost?

$5,200 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $4,050–$6,600. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 10 communities with 50 or more beds within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

Among 64 other homes of a similar licensed size across Orange County that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $3,333 to $5,895 a month, and the middle figure is $4,498 (n = 64 other homes publishing a starting rate).

Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.

A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.

The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.

A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.

Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.

Does Aegis Assisted Living of Laguna Niguel take Medi-Cal?

On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.

Who holds the license?

The license is held by Aegis Senior Communities, LLC, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. See the homes licensed to Aegis Senior Communities, LLC — at least 6 on the state roster.

Is there a hospital nearby?

Providence Mission Hospital - Laguna Beach is 1.9 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.

Can Aegis Assisted Living of Laguna Niguel keep a resident on hospice?

Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 15 residents, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

Aegis Assisted Living of Laguna Niguel license and inspection record

  • Name on the license: “AEGIS ASSISTED LIVING OF LAGUNA NIGUEL”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
  • License #306003905. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • Licensed for 96 residents — a large community, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • Licensed to Aegis Senior Communities, LLC, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • First licensed in 2008, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • 12 state inspection visits since 2008, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • 0 Type A and 1 Type B citation on file since 2008, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. The same records count 12 state visits in that period.
  • 5 complaints and 1 substantiated allegation on file since 2008, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
  • The most recent state visit on file is August 18, 2026, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
Type A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗

See the state’s own record

Can they support the care needed?

California licenses a home for specific kinds of care. The state’s record lists what this home is approved for; the home’s own answers fill in what changes as needs change.

  • Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved · covers up to 75 residents
  • Dementia / memory careNot on file · ask the home
  • Hospice careApproved · covers up to 15 residents
  • BedriddenApproved · covers up to 21 residents

State licensing record · September 13, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.

Read the state’s own wording
75 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 21 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 15, TOTAL CARE WAIVER FOR 11.

985 - RCFE / HOSPICE

CDSS record, verbatim · September 13, 2026

As needs change

  • Medicines

    Level of medication service: reminders only

    Ask: “Who manages the medicines, and what happens when a dose is missed?”

    caring.com · 2026-09-09

  • Staying through hospice

    Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 15 — care may continue at the end of life

    Ask: “If hospice is needed, can care continue here until the end?”

    State licensing record · September 13, 2026

3 more questions to ask the home
  • Two-person transfers or a lift

    Not on file

    Ask: “If two people or a lift are needed to transfer, can the person stay?”

  • Someone awake overnight

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?”

  • If memory loss develops

    Dementia-care designation not on file

    Ask: “If memory loss develops, what would change — and when would a move be needed?”

Care & day-to-day support

These are the home’s own statements about its day-to-day practice — they are not part of the state licensing record, and the state has not approved or reviewed them.

  • Works with hospice

    Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Level of medication serviceReminders only

    Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

Nights & staffing

  • Nurse coverageNurse on Staff (Part time)

    Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

What it costs here

Covelight estimate

$5,200a month to start

Likely $4,050–$6,600

From 10 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file

Likely monthly total

$5,200a month

Likely $4,050–$6,750

With a studio and basic help.

An estimate for planning, not a quote. The price is made in the phone call.

See the full cost breakdownRoom, care and fees · how people pay · how this estimate works
Room
Daily care
Sharing the room

Memory care is not priced here: a dementia-care designation is not on file for this home. Ask the home.

  • Starting monthly rate$5,200likely $4,050–$6,600

    Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 10 communities with 50 or more beds within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

  • Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600

    Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (45 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).

  • One-time move-in fee$2,000one time · likely $0–$4,000

    Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,000 (134 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.

Likely monthly totalLikely $4,050–$6,750
$5,200
First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $4,850–$9,750
$7,200
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
  • Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
  • Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
  • SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
  • VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
  • Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
  • MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
If the money runs out, what Medi-Cal covers
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
  • The care level

    Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.

  • What is billed separately

    Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.

  • Move-in costs

    A one-time community fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.

  • Increases

    California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.

  • What is the full monthly cost for the room and care we need, and what does it include?
  • What would the next care level cost, and who decides when it changes?
  • What is billed separately, and is there a one-time fee or deposit at move-in?
  • Is any private-pay period required before another payment program can begin?
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 10 communities with 50 or more beds within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

10 homes like this within 5 miles publish starting rates mostly between $3,800–$8,100.

  • Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
  • Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
  • Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
  • Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
  • We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
  • It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Show the 10 nearby homes behind this estimate

Where it is

  • 32170 Niguel Road, Laguna Niguel, CA 92677Address from the public record · September 13, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.

Opening the neighborhood map…

The state record

California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. Here are the dated documents and the state’s own words, beside what is typical for homes this size.

Since 2021, the state has filed 13 documents for this home, and its records count 12 visits since 2008. The most recent — a complaint investigation report on October 9, 2025 — closed with the state’s outcome word: “Unsubstantiated.”

On file since
2021
State visits
12
Most recent visit
August 18, 2026
Occupied · October 9, 2025 visit
71 of 96 bedsa count on that day, not an opening

We hold 5 complaint reports the state published for this home, dated May 6, 2022 to October 9, 2025. 5 of the 5 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (1), “Unsubstantiated” (4). 5 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word. Summary composed by computer from the 5 complaint reports below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

Beside homes the same size

  • Type A citations0typical 0
  • Type B citations1typical 1
  • Substantiated allegations1typical 2
  • Total complaints5typical 6

“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,354 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this licence since 2008.

Year by year
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated20254602024220202311020223312021110

The last 36 months — 9 of 13 documents

20254 state visits · 6 documents
Oct 9, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff stole resident’s personal belongings.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Joseph Alejandre made an announced visit to continue the investigation into the allegation listed above. LPA met with Executive Director Kurt Knauer and Care Director Gina Pakpahan and explained the reason for the visit. During the visit LPA and staff toured the facility. The investigation into the allegation, staff stole resident's personal belongings, revealed the following. It was reported that between the hours of 9:30 pm on June 28 and 10:00 am on June 29, Resident 1's (R1's) three rings went missing. Witness 1 (W1) reported to the facility that R1's rings were missing. Law Enforcement was contacted and they began their investigation. Their investigation has not been completed. A review of the facility schedule shows 9 staff members were present at the facility from 9:00pm and 10:00am. Video surveillance showed 10 individuals went into the room, 2 hospice staff, 7 facility staff and 1 visitor for R1. LPA viewed the video surveillance with the Executive Director. LPA did not observe anyone taking anything from R1 but the video is not clear enough see all the details of the room or individuals in the room. 9 out of 9 witnesses interviewed who went into R1's room during the time in question denied the allegation. Unsubstantiated 9 out of 9 witnesses interviewed reported they had no knowledge of any of R1's belongings being stolen. W1 did not respond to LPAs request for an interview. The Executive Director reported that staff looked for R1's rings but could not find them. The Care Director reported that their internal investigation could not determine what happened to the rings. A review of R1's file shows R1 did not have an inventory list completed at the time of move in. R1 passed away on July 31, 2025. None of the evidence gathered supports the allegation, therefore the allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated, meaning that although the allegation may have happened or is valid there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation did or did not occur. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of the report provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 9, 2025 · control 22-AS-20250729154116
Sep 25, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Resident sustained stage 4 pressure injury while in care due to neglect Resident sustained fracture while in care due to lack of care and supervision

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Rose Ruppert conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings on an investigation completed by the Department. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility by the Concierge and explained the purpose of the visit. During the course of the investigation, the Department interviewed staff and witnesses; and subpoenaed and reviewed medical records from Kaiser Permanente and Home Health Services. The investigation revealed the following: Resident #1 (R1) was admitted to the facility on November 24, 2022, and resided in Memory Care. Per Physician report dated October 31, 2024, R1 had a diagnosis of Hydronephrosis with renal and ureteral calculous obstruction, sepsis and Mild Cognitive Impairment. Physician report further assessed R1 was non-ambulatory and a maximum assist for all self-care needs and activities of daily living. (Continued on LIC 9099-C) Unsubstantiated (Continued from LIC 9099) On February 5, 2025, R1 developed a wound on their left hip and on the heels of their feet. R1 received Home Health services through Kaiser Permanente for catheter care and heel wounds. On February 5, 2025, R1 was transported to Kaiser Hospital due to a ruptured urethra and for further evaluation of the hip and heel wounds. R1 returned to the community on February 6, 2025, after hospital treatment with a diagnosis of Urinary Tract Infection and orders for medication treatment. Four days later, on February 10, 2025, the Health Care Director requested R1 be sent out to Kaiser Hospital for further medical evaluation for the hip and heel wounds that were not improving. Resident was treated and admitted to the hospital and was discharged on February 18, 2025, to a Skilled Nursing Facility. During the course of treatment the Power of Attorney (POA) received communication from both facility staff and Home Health regarding the hip and heel pressure wounds. Facility had spoken to the Power of Attorney (POA) on January 29, 2025, requesting the resident receive hospice care for the open wounds in order for the resident to return to the facility. POA declined hospice services due to a scheduled surgery for kidney stones. The physician was notified and the nurse treated the affected area. POA was aware of R1’s declining health and management discussed with POA to consider a personal caregiver to provide supervision to prevent further falls or injuries but family was not able to provide a personal caregiver. Care staff would do frequent body checks and rotate R1, based on R1’s service plan, which was documented by facility staff and Home Health. Due to statements and documents, nurses’ progress notes and home health notes there is not enough information to support the allegation that Resident #1 sustained stage 4 pressure injury while in care due to Neglect/Lack of Care and Supervision. The allegation is Unsubstantiated. It was alleged that Resident sustained a fracture while in care due to lack of care and supervision. Resident #1 (R1) had eleven unwitnessed falls in 2023-2024 in their bedroom; due to R1 getting out of bed and walking. Per Physician’s Report dated October 31, 2024, R1 is unable to transfer to and from the bed and is non-ambulatory. R1 also is diagnosed with Mild Cognitive Impairment. (Continued on LIC 9099-C1) (Continued from LIC 9099-C) The Department reviewed Unusual Incident Reports for R1’s unwitnessed falls for the following dates: 8/10/2023, 8/22/2023, 9/24/2023, 9/25/2023, 10/27/2023, 03/22/2024, 03/25/2024, 04/01/2024, 04/10/2024, 05/04/2024, 05/09/2024 and 07/02/2024. R1’s needs and service plan was updated on 08/22/2023 following their first two falls and again on 12/23/2023 following their next three falls. After continuing to sustain falls, the facility updated the needs and service plan on 03/19/2024; 06/26/2024; 09/21/2024; and 11/20/2024 with suggested fall interventions which included: toilet resident before and after meals and before bedtime, frequent checks, involve resident in activities during the day and monitor for medication side effects. On April 4, 2024, management implemented fall risk prevention measures by requesting a low bed, frequent checks on R1 and discussed extra care and supervision. POA was unable to provide a personal caregiver but facility staff conducted additional status checks, every thirty minutes on R1 to prevent falls. Record review did not report any injuries related to the falls; both by the facility and home health. On February 10, 2025, R1 was transported to Kaiser Hospital due to pressure wounds not improving and to be evaluated by an orthopedic surgeon regarding a fracture. R1 was diagnosed with a left femur fracture. . The surgeon reported the fracture to be old, chronic and nonoperative and the fracture was healing and surgery was unnecessary. No time frame was provided and the injury was reported to be old. Facility staff accompanied R1 to appointments and there is no documentation regarding R1 having a fractured hip prior to diagnosis. R1 was treated at the hospital and was given medication for pain and discomfort. Although R1 had multiple falls and sustained a fracture, it remains unclear the source of cause for the fracture and therefore whether it was due to neglect. There is not enough information to support the allegation that the: Resident sustained fracture while in care due to lack of care and supervision. Based on interviews conducted and records reviewed, although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur. Therefore the allegations that the: Resident sustained a stage 4 pressure injury while in care and the Resident sustained a fracture while in care due to lack of care and supervision are Unsubstantiated. An exit interview was conducted with Kurt Knauer, General Manager, and a copy of this report was left at the facility.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 25, 2025 · control 22-AS-20250218081943
Sep 25, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Deficiencies

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Rose Ruppert conducted an unannounced case management visit to deliver findings on an investigation completed by the Department. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility by the Concierge and explained the purpose of the visit. During the Department’s investigation for complaint control # 22-AS-20250218081, the following was discovered: Resident #1 (R1) was admitted to the facility on November 24, 2022, and resided in Memory Care. Per Physician report dated October 31, 2024, R1 had a diagnosis of Hydronephrosis with renal and ureteral calculous obstruction, sepsis and Mild Cognitive Impairment. Physician report further assessed R1 was non-ambulatory and a maximum assist for all self-care needs and activities of daily living. On December 4, 2024, facility progress notes document that, “the resident’s left heel is noted with a small purple/red discoloration non-blanchable. The care team was instructed to reposition resident every two hours, elevate the resident’s legs and support R1’s heels with a pillow for support.” LPA spoke with Health Service Director if facility has a log that tracks how often a resident is turned. The facility currently does have a log to track frequency of turning of residents. On December 5, 2025, facility progress notes by LVN at 8:04pm document, “Pt noted to have unstageable wound on Left heel.” Care staff continue to observe the unstageable pressure injury in the progress notes and applied foam dressing and wound care. On January 16, 2025 Home Health delivered heel protectors to apply in heels daily. (Continued on LIC 809-C) (Continued from LIC 809) Home Health Notes from January 29, 2025, documented a large eschar on the left heel of R1 and an appointment was scheduled with Primary Care Physician at 3:30pm. R1’s Power of Attorney (POA) was notified. Physician addressed pressure ulcer of left heel, unstageable pressure injury and gave a referral order for hospice. Home Health notes confirm this diagnosis and nurse applied Betadine to the area on February 1, 2025. R1 was sent out to the hospital on February 5, 2025, for further evaluation of a urethral rupture and Urinary Tract infection. R1 returned to the facility on February 6, 2025, at 12:30am with antibiotics. On February 10, 2025, R1 is noted with a pressure injury on the right hip, as well as the unstageable wound on left heel. General Manager (GM) and nurse spoke with POA about wound concerns and R1 was transported to Emergency Room for further evaluation. Facility Progress notes dated on February 18, 2025, document that POA spoke with GM and reported R1 was in a Skilled Nursing Facility (SNF) and would be discharged from Aegis Senior Living. Based on Department record review and interviews, it is determined that Resident #1 (R1) was diagnosed with an unstageable pressure injury on R1’s left heel on December 5, 2024. The facility retained the resident with a prohibited health condition until February 10, 2025. The following is being cited per California Code of Regulations, Title 22. A Civil Penalty is pending determination by Community Care Licensing Division as per Health & Safety Code 1569.49 (f) An exit interview was conducted with Kurt Knauer, General Manager, and a copy of this report, the LIC 809-D, the LIC 421IM and Appeal Rights were provided to the facility.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 25, 2025

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87615(a)(1) · Plan of correction due date: Sep 26, 2025

87615 Prohibited Health Conditions (a) Persons who require health services for or have a health condition...shall not be admitted or retained in a residential care facility for the elderly: (1) Stage 3 and 4 pressure injuries. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on Department record review and interviews Resident #1 (R1) was documented to have an unstageable pressure injury on 12/5/24, which is a prohibited condition, and remained in the facility until 2/10/25. This poses an immediate health and safety risk to the resident in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 25, 2025

Plan of correction: General Manager (GM) will speak with VP of Nursing and Nursting staff to provide staff-inservice on Prohibited Conditions; which include Pressure Injuries. GM will email LPA documentation of inservices by end of business 9/27/2025.

Sep 25, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Deficiencies

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Rose Ruppert conducted an unannounced case management visit to deliver findings on an investigation completed by the Department. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility by the Concierge and explained the purpose of the visit. During the Department’s investigation for complaint control # 22-AS-20250218081, the following was discovered: Resident #1 (R1) was admitted to the facility on November 24, 2022, and resided in Memory Care. Per Physician report dated October 31, 2024, R1 had a diagnosis of Hydronephrosis with renal and ureteral calculous obstruction, sepsis and Mild Cognitive Impairment. Physician report further assessed R1 was non-ambulatory and a maximum assist for all self-care needs and activities of daily living. On December 4, 2024, facility progress notes document that, “the resident’s left heel is noted with a small purple/red discoloration non-blanchable. The care team was instructed to reposition resident every two hours, elevate the resident’s legs and support R1’s heels with a pillow for support.” LPA spoke with Health Service Director if facility has a log that tracks how often a resident is turned. The facility currently does have a log to track frequency of turning of residents. On December 5, 2025, facility progress notes by LVN at 8:04pm document, “Pt noted to have unstageable wound on Left heel.” Care staff continue to observe the unstageable pressure injury in the progress notes and applied foam dressing and wound care. On January 16, 2025 Home Health delivered heel protectors to apply in heels daily. (Continued on LIC 809-C) (Continued from LIC 809) Home Health Notes from January 29, 2025, documented a large eschar on the left heel of R1 and an appointment was scheduled with Primary Care Physician at 3:30pm. R1’s Power of Attorney (POA) was notified. Physician addressed pressure ulcer of left heel, unstageable pressure injury and gave a referral order for hospice. Home Health notes confirm this diagnosis and nurse applied Betadine to the area on February 1, 2025. R1 was sent out to the hospital on February 5, 2025, for further evaluation of a urethral rupture and Urinary Tract infection. R1 returned to the facility on February 6, 2025, at 12:30am with antibiotics. On February 10, 2025, R1 is noted with a pressure injury on the right hip, as well as the unstageable wound on left heel. General Manager (GM) and nurse spoke with POA about wound concerns and R1 was transported to Emergency Room for further evaluation. Facility Progress notes dated on February 18, 2025, document that POA spoke with GM and reported R1 was in a Skilled Nursing Facility (SNF) and would be discharged from Aegis Senior Living. Based on Department record review and interviews, it is determined that Resident #1 (R1) was diagnosed with an unstageable pressure injury on R1’s left heel on December 5, 2024. The facility retained the resident with a prohibited health condition until February 10, 2025. The following is being cited per California Code of Regulations, Title 22. A Civil Penalty is pending determination by Community Care Licensing Division as per Health & Safety Code 1569.49 (f) An exit interview was conducted with Kurt Knauer, General Manager, and a copy of this report, the LIC 809-D, the LIC 421IM and Appeal Rights were provided to the facility.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 25, 2025

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87615(a)(1) · Plan of correction due date: Sep 26, 2025

87615 Prohibited Health Conditions (a) Persons who require health services for or have a health condition...shall not be admitted or retained in a residential care facility for the elderly: (1) Stage 3 and 4 pressure injuries. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on Department record review and interviews Resident #1 (R1) was documented to have an unstageable pressure injury on 12/5/24, which is a prohibited condition, and remained in the facility until 2/10/25. This poses an immediate health and safety risk to the resident in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 25, 2025

Plan of correction: General Manager (GM) will speak with VP of Nursing and Nursting staff to provide staff-inservice on Prohibited Conditions; which include Pressure Injuries. GM will email LPA documentation of inservices by end of business 9/27/2025.

Sep 24, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff physically abused resident in care. Resident sustained injuries while in care. Facility does not have adequate staffing to meet resident's needs.

LPA Joseph Alejandre made an unannounced visit to deliver the findings of the complaint investigation into the allegations listed above. LPA met with Executive Director Kurt Knauer and explained the reason for the visit. During the course of the investigation, Department staff inspected the facility, interviewed witnesses, and staff, and obtained and reviewed records, including Resident 1’s (R1) physician’s report dated April 16, 2021, R1’s facility assessment\care plan dated April 21, 2021. R1’s Admission Agreement dated April 21, 2021. R1’s Medication Administration Record (MAR) for September 2021, R1’s medication list for September 2021. R1's emergency contact information sheet. Staff roster and schedule for September 2021. The investigation into the allegation, staff physically abused resident in care, revealed the following, on September 21, 2021, at or around 6:30 pm Resident 1 (R1) was walking down the hall toward their room and had a bowel movement. Unsubstantiated Witness (W1) reported it to Staff 1 (S1). R1 resides in memory care which has a secure perimeter with delayed egress exits. S1 attempted to assist R1 but R1 was not responding to S1. S1 called for Staff 2 (S2) to assist. W1 reported to law enforcement that S1 and R1 began punching each other. W1 reported to LPA that they did not actually see S1 hit R1 but assumed they were being hit because R1 was yelling. W1 reported to law enforcement that R1 was yelling, “Kill her. Kill her.” W1 reported to LPA they didn’t remember what R1 said. S1 reported that R1 had defecated in the hallway, and they wanted to get them out of their clothing and shoes because they were soiled. S1 stated that R1 became combative and tried to hit them. S1 stated that R1 started to lose their balance and started to fall so S1 held them up so they would not fall. S1 stated that they called S2 who came and took off R1’s shoes and asked R1 to walk to their room and R1 started to walk to their room. S1 and S2 both reported that once in the room they showered R1, put clean clothes on R1 and put R1 to bed. S1 denied hitting R1 and reported they have never abused any residents. S2 reported they did not witness S1 hit or abuse R1 in any way. No other staff members or witnesses were present during the incident. Law enforcement took a report on September 23, 2021, but did not take any action. LPA attempted to interview R1 but R1 did not recall the incident. Based on the evidence gathered, the allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated, meaning that although the allegation may have happened or is valid there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation did or did not occur. The investigation into the allegation, resident sustained injuries while in care, revealed the following. It was alleged that Resident 1 (R1) sustained bruises on their forearms which were caused by facility staff. R1 was interviewed but did not recall how their arms were bruised. 5 out of 5 staff interviewed were unaware of R1 bruising until they were told about it. 5 out of 5 staff interviewed denied causing any injuries to R1 or any residents. The General Manager stated that R1’s responsible party informed them of the bruise and asked staff about it but no one could explain how it occurred. None of the staff interviewed could explain how R1 sustained their bruises. R1 resides in memory care which has a secure perimeter. R1 is on 2 medications, that can cause bruising, Quetiapine Fumarate and Lorazepam, but it is rare. The facility does not have any surveillance cameras. R1’s responsible party reported the unexplained bruises could have been caused by facility staff. The facility General Manager reported that they spoke to memory care staff, and no one reported any falls or incidents regarding R1 that could explain the bruises. LPA toured the memory care unit and R1’s room. No obstacles or hazards were observed. A review of facility documents for August 2021 and September 2021 do not list R1 as having any accidents or injuries. It is unknown how R1 sustained their bruises. None of the evidence gathered supports the allegation, therefore the allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated, meaning that although the allegation may have happened or is valid there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation did or did not occur. Regarding the allegation, the facility does not have adequate staffing to meet residents’ needs, the investigation revealed the following. It was alleged that the facility is understaffed in memory care and that the residents may not get their meals. No other specific details were provided concerning the lack of staff at the facility other than care would not be provided. At the time of the report the facility census was 70, with 22 of the residents residing in memory care. A review of the facility schedule shows the facility has an average of 25 care staff working each day including medication technicians, 13 for assisted living and 12 for memory care. For the months of August and September 2021 the Agency (CCL) received a total of 6 incident reports (LIC 624). None of the incident reports received give cause for concern for residents’ health and safety and none of them warranted a follow up visit. During the visit on January 27, 2022, LPA observed all the residents in memory care eating in the dining area. There have been no other reports that the facility does not have adequate staffing. Based on the information gathered through observation and a review of records, the allegation that the facility does not have adequate staffing to meet resident’s needs is deemed Unsubstantiated. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is no preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of the report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 24, 2025 · control 22-AS-20210927111109
Sep 22, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

On September 22, 2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Brandon Lopez made an unannounced visit to the facility to conduct the required annual inspection. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility by staff after explaining the purpose for the visit. General Manager (GM) Kurt Knauer was present and assisted on today's inspection. LPA observed that Kurt Knauer has a valid Administrator certificate which expires on May 16, 2026. The facility is a Residential Care Facility for the Elderly (RCFE) licensed for ninety six residents, of which twenty one may be bedridden, and has a hospice waiver for fifteen. The facility is a two story building with resident bedrooms on the first and second floor, bathrooms are located in each resident apartment, a commercial kitchen, three dining halls, three activity rooms, two medication rooms, multiple staff offices, and a courtyard in the center of the facility. The facility has two memory care units and the rest of the facility operates as Assisted Living. On today's visit, there are seventy one residents in care, of which five are on hospice. LPA, accompanied by the GM, conducted a tour of the interior portion of the facility. LPA observed the See Something, Say Something poster (PUB 475) mounted on the wall by the entryway of the facility. LPA randomly inspected resident bedrooms on the first and second floors of the facility. Resident bedrooms were clean and free of hazards. Resident bedrooms had the required furnishings of a bed, a chair, a chest of drawers, and a lamp. Resident beds had clean linens and blankets. LPA also inspected the bathrooms in each of the resident apartments inspected. Bathrooms were clean. Bathrooms were equipped with grab bars and non skid floors. Faucets and toilets were operational. Hot water temperature measured between 105.6 to 116.2 degrees Fahrenheit. CONTINUED ON LIC809-C LPA inspected the commercial kitchen and observed it to be clean. The kitchen has a two day perishable and a seven day non-perishable food supply on hand. Kitchen knives and sharps are stored inaccessible to residents in care. LPA also observed the facility has a three day emergency food and water supply stored in the kitchen pantry. LPA inspected all other facility common areas such as the dining halls, activity rooms, storage rooms, and observed them to be clear of any hazards. LPA observed emergency evacuation chairs in each of the facility stair wells. LPA observed the facility passed their most recent fire inspection on March 11, 2025, in which the facility's fire sprinklers were tested. LPA observed fire extinguishers mounted on the walls on the first and second floors of the facility. Fire extinguishers were observed to be charged and serviced as of March 12, 2025. LPA observed the facility conducted their most recent emergency disaster drill on August 20, 2025. LPA observed the centrally stored medications to be kept in locked medicine carts located in the medication rooms on the first and second floor. LPA observed each medication room to have a First Aid Kit and they had all the required components. LPA reviewed eight resident files. All the required documents were present and current in the resident files reviewed. LPA reviewed residents' medication and medication records. LPA reviewed eight staff files. All staff are background cleared and associated to the facility. Based on the observations made during today's visit, no deficiencies are being cited per the Title 22 of the California Code of Regulations. An exit interview was conducted with General Manager Kurt Knauer and a copy of the report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 22, 2025
20242 state visits · 2 documents
Oct 17, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility staff is violating resident’s personal rights by not allowing visitors to see the resident. Staff member was engaged in a verbal altercation in the presence of the residents

On this day, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kevin Saborit-Guasch made an unannounced visit to the facility for the purpose of conducting a follow-up investigation visit and delivering findings regarding the two allegations listed above. LPA was greeted and granted entry by facility front desk staff after introducing himself and stating the purpose of the visit. Wellness Director Francisco Delgado was present and assisted with the visit as General Manager Kurt Knauer was out accompanying a resident to a medical appointment. An initial complaint investigation visit took place on August 16, 2024. During that first visit, LPA requested the current facility census as well as resident records for four currently admitted residents and reviewed their admission agreements, individual needs and services plans as well as physician reports on file. LPA conducted resident and staff interviews. Witness interviews also conducted via telephone at a later time. During the present visit, LPA requested the facility's staff schedule and conducted six additional staff interviews. CONTINUED ON FORM LIC9099-C Unsubstantiated CONTINUED FROM FORM LIC9099 Regarding the allegation that Facility staff is violating resident’s personal rights by not allowing visitors to see the resident, the following has been concluded: Based on records reviewed and interviews conducted, resident R1 as well as staff members and witnesses interviewed deny any interference from facility staff into R1's ability to receive visitors as he pleases. R1 stated that he is fully able to receive visits from whoever he would like. A review of resident records for R1 additionally allowed LPA to verify the identity of R1's responsible party and attorney-in-fact. A signed letter from the resident's stated primary care physician dated February 29, 2024 indicates that "Due to [R1's] age and chronic medical conditions, I request that his life not be disturbed at this time by visits from other family than his daughter who has been instrumental in acting in his behalf to help him recover from recent physical trauma and hospitalization and securing an appropriate series of care facilities that meet his physical and emotional needs." The letter further states that "[R1] was seen in my office on 02/26/24 where I thoroughly interviewed him and found him physically improved and mentally competent to understand his life situation and make informed decisions as to his preference to not be unduly disturbed or manipulated." Regarding the allegation that Staff member was engaged in a verbal altercation in the presence of the residents, the following has been concluded: Based on witness, staff and resident interviews conducted, no instances of staff engaging in loud arguments, altercations or talking inappropriately to visitors could be corroborated. Multiple statements to the opposite were however made, emphasizing how nice and welcoming the facility feels overall. As a result of this investigation, both allegations are found to be Unsubstantiated, meaning that although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove or refute the alleged violations occurred. An exit interview was conducted with General Manager Kurt Knauer who authorized facility staff to sign on his behalf and a copy of this report was provided to a facility representative.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 17, 2024 · control 22-AS-20240812111855
Sep 20, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Joseph Alejandre and Rose Rupert made an unannounced visit to conduct the required annual inspection. LPAs were greeted and granted entry by staff. LPAs met with General Manager Kurt Knauer and explained the reason for the visit. LPAs and General Manager toured the facility. The facility has a capacity of 96, 75 non-ambulatory, of which 21 may be bedridden and a hospice waiver for 15. The facility is a two story building with a central courtyard in the center. The facility has one kitchen with multiple dining and activity rooms. All the rooms are private with the their own bathroom. The memory care units are on the first floor, one unit (Golden Lantern) is on the North side of the building and the other unit (Blue Lantern) is on the South side of the building. Both memory care units have delayed egress exits. The LPAs tested the delayed egress exits and they are operational. LPAs observed the See Something Say Something poster (PUB 475) posted in the main entry way of the facility. LPAs observed each stairway had an emergency evacuation chair. All fire extinguishers are fully charged. LPAs inspected seven resident rooms. LPAs observed each resident room inspected was clean and had the required furnishings. Hot water was measured in each room inspected. Hot water measured from 105.9 to 118.9 degrees Fahrenheit. LPAs observed emergency food and water stored in a supply closet. LPAs toured the kitchen and dining room. The kitchen is clean and organized. LPAs observed temperature logs for the refrigerators and freezers posted in the kitchen. The refrigerators and freezer are kept at the required temperatures. LPAs observed a 2 day perishable and a 7 day non-perishable food supply on hand in the kitchen. The last fire drill was conducted on August 6, 2024. LPAs observed the medication cart is kept locked in the health and wellness office. LPAs inspected the first aid kit. The first aid kit did not contain a first aid manual. LPAs and the General Manager toured the courtyard. No bodies of water observed. The fountain has been converted into a large planter. There are numerous tables and chairs with umbrellas to sit outside. During the visit LPAs observed residents playing bingo in the activity room and LPAs observed a sing a long in the activity room. The fireplaces in the library and the downstairs parlor are screened. No obstacles or hazards observed inside or outside of the facility. LPAs reviewed 7 resident files, no discrepancies observed. LPAs reviewed 5 staff files, no discrepancies observed. Staff files reviewed had the required training including CPR/First aid. LPAs interviewed staff and residents. All staff interviewed and files that were reviewed are background cleared and associated to the facility. No deficiencies are being cited as a result of this visit. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of the report provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 20, 2024

The state marks this report as 3 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 2. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.

20231 state visit · 1 document
Dec 20, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Incident

This unannounced Case Management – Incident inspection is being conducted by Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sean Haddad for the purpose of following up on a self-reported incident report received in the Orange County Regional Office (OCRO) on 11/27/23 regarding Resident #1 (R1). LPA met with Administrator (AD) Kurt Knauer and discussed the purpose of the inspection. During the inspection, LPA and AD toured the facility and inspected R1’s room. LPA conducted health and safety checks on residents present and confirmed they were doing well and observed no health and safety issues. LPA observed the facility to be clean and organized and found no health and safety issues. LPA observed the facility has a 2-day supply of perishables and a 7-day supply of non-perishable food is available as required by regulations, the electricity and water were running, the facility had soap and paper towels, and the medications, sharps, and toxins were properly stored. LPA interviewed AD and staff and requested and reviewed copies of R1’s resident file. LPA and AD observed the following: R1’s most recent Physician’s Report was completed on 06/10/22 and states R1 has Dementia. Based on the information obtained during today’s inspection, deficiencies are being cited per Title 22 Division 6 of the California Code of Regulations. See LIC809D. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report and appeal rights was discussed with and provided to facility representative.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 20, 2023

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87705(c)(5) · Plan of correction due date: Jan 17, 2024

87705 Care of Persons with Dementia (c) Licensees who accept and retain residents with dementia shall be responsible for ensuring the following: (5) Each resident with dementia shall have an annual medical assessment… This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on documents, the licensee did not ensure R1 received an annual medical assessment when R1’s last medical assessment was conducted on 06/10/22, which poses a potential health risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 20, 2023

Plan of correction: Licensee stated they will ensure all residents with Dementia have Physician's Reports completed within the last year and will submit proof to LPA by POC due date. Licensee stated they have a protocol for obtaining annual Physician's Reports for residents with Dementia and will submit a copy to LPA by POC due date.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedthere was not enough evidence to prove a violation occurred — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe evidence showed the allegation was false, could not have happened, or had no reasonable basisType A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗

An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents and the questions below stand in their place.

Who holds the licence

Aegis Senior Communities, LLC, licensed since 2008, operates 4 licensed homes in California. Running more than one home is common and is neither good nor bad on its own.

Life here

Rooms, meals, the rhythm of a day, faith and language, pets and house rules — as the home describes them. Tap any detail for its source and date; nothing here is graded.

Find a detail about life at this home.

Rooms & the spaces they will use

  • Outdoor spaceGarden

    Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Common areasEntertainment venue

    Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Salon or barber

    Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

Pets, routines & independence

  • Residents may bring a pet

    Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

Before you call

Ask every home the same questions — the state’s record does not answer these. Keep the ones that matter and they travel with your saved homes.

  1. What is included in the monthly rate, and what costs extra?
  2. Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?
  3. Which rooms does the non-ambulatory approval cover, and what transfer support is provided?
  4. What could change whether someone can stay here?
  5. Can we see a bedroom and share a meal during a visit?

Other homes nearby

The nearest licensed homes in Orange County, closest first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.

Explore Orange County