Illustration — no photo of this home on file yet

Perpetual Help Home Care

Small home·Licensed for 6·Valley Center, California

Licensed since 2019Licence #374604108
  • Care approvals on fileWheelchair · Hospice · BedriddenState licensing record · September 27, 2026
  • Estimated starting rate$4,850 a monthCovelight estimate · likely $4,000–$6,000
  • Home sizeLicensed for 6Small care home · a licensed care home (RCFE)
  • Room at the last state visit5 of 6 beds occupiedApril 2, 2026 · not a current opening
  • Ways to payAsk the homeMedi-Cal ALW participation not on file
  • Last state visitApril 2, 2026CDSS inspection record

Perpetual Help Home Care is a small care home in Valley Center — a licensed residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE), the licence category behind “assisted living” and “board and care.” It is licensed for 6 residents since 2019. Dementia care is not on file.

Built from CDSS public records · September 27, 2026. Every fact below names its source and date.

Quick answers and the state record

A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

Quick answers about Perpetual Help Home Care

Is Perpetual Help Home Care licensed?

The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

How many residents is Perpetual Help Home Care licensed for?

6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Has Perpetual Help Home Care been cited?

0 Type A and 0 Type B citations since 2019, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. Those records count 8 state visits over the same years.

Is Perpetual Help Home Care still open?

This license was on the CDSS roster as of September 28, 2026.

What does Perpetual Help Home Care cost?

$4,850 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $4,000–$6,000. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 17 small homes and similar homes within 10 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

Among 195 other homes of a similar licensed size across San Diego County that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $4,500 to $6,000 a month, and the middle figure is $5,000 (n = 195 other homes publishing a starting rate).

Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.

A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.

The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.

A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.

Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.

Does Perpetual Help Home Care take Medi-Cal?

On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.

Who holds the license?

The license is held by El Norte Home Care Co, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. See the homes licensed to El Norte Home Care Co. — at least 3 on the state roster.

Can Perpetual Help Home Care keep a resident on hospice?

Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 1 resident, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Perpetual Help Home Care license and inspection record

  • Name on the license: “PERPETUAL HELP HOME CARE”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
  • License #374604108. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • Licensed for 6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • Licensed to El Norte Home Care Co, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • First licensed in 2019, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • 8 state inspection visits since 2019, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • 0 Type A and 0 Type B citations on file since 2019, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. The same records count 8 state visits in that period.
  • 2 complaints and 0 substantiated allegations on file since 2019, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
  • The most recent state visit on file is April 2, 2026, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
Type A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗

See the state’s own record

Can they support the care needed?

California licenses a home for specific kinds of care. The state’s record lists what this home is approved for; the home’s own answers fill in what changes as needs change.

  • Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved · covers up to 6 residents
  • Dementia / memory careNot on file · ask the home
  • Hospice careApproved · covers up to 1 resident
  • BedriddenApproved · covers up to 1 resident

State licensing record · September 27, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.

Read the state’s own wording
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. SIX (6) NONAMBULATORY OF WHICH ONE (1) MAY BE BEDRIDDEN.BEDRIDDEN IN BEDROOM 1 ONLY. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR ONE (1).

935 - ELDERLY

CDSS record, verbatim · September 27, 2026

As needs change

  • Staying through hospice

    Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 1 — care may continue at the end of life

    Ask: “If hospice is needed, can care continue here until the end?”

    State licensing record · September 27, 2026

4 more questions to ask the home
  • Two-person transfers or a lift

    Not on file

    Ask: “If two people or a lift are needed to transfer, can the person stay?”

  • Someone awake overnight

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?”

  • Medicines

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who manages the medicines, and what happens when a dose is missed?”

  • If memory loss develops

    Dementia-care designation not on file

    Ask: “If memory loss develops, what would change — and when would a move be needed?”

What it costs here

Covelight estimate

$4,850a month to start

Likely $4,000–$6,000

From 17 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file

Likely monthly total

$4,850a month

Likely $4,000–$6,150

With a shared room and basic help.

An estimate for planning, not a quote. The price is made in the phone call.

See the full cost breakdownRoom, care and fees · how people pay · how this estimate works
Room
Daily care
Sharing the room

Memory care is not priced here: a dementia-care designation is not on file for this home. Ask the home.

  • Starting monthly rate$4,850likely $4,000–$6,000

    Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 17 small homes and similar homes within 10 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

  • Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600

    Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (45 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).

  • One-time move-in fee$2,000one time · likely $0–$4,000

    Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,000 (134 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.

Likely monthly totalLikely $4,000–$6,150
$4,850
First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $4,650–$9,250
$6,850
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
  • Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
  • Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
  • SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
  • VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
  • Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
  • MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
If the money runs out, what Medi-Cal covers
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
  • The care level

    Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.

  • What is billed separately

    Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.

  • Move-in costs

    A one-time community fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.

  • Increases

    California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.

  • What is the full monthly cost for the room and care we need, and what does it include?
  • What would the next care level cost, and who decides when it changes?
  • What is billed separately, and is there a one-time fee or deposit at move-in?
  • Is any private-pay period required before another payment program can begin?
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 17 small homes and similar homes within 10 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

17 homes like this within 10 miles publish starting rates mostly between $3,400–$6,500.

  • Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
  • Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
  • Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
  • Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
  • We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
  • It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Show the 17 nearby homes behind this estimate

Where it is

  • 29531 Mactan Rd, Valley Center, CA 92082Address from the public record · September 27, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.

Opening the neighborhood map…

The state record

California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. Here are the dated documents and the state’s own words, beside what is typical for homes this size.

Since 2021, the state has filed 9 documents for this home, and its records count 8 visits since 2019. The most recent — a complaint investigation report on April 2, 2026 — closed with the state’s outcome word: “Unsubstantiated.”

On file since
2021
State visits
8
Most recent visit
April 2, 2026
Occupied at that visit
5 of 6 bedsa count on that day, not an opening

We hold 2 complaint reports the state published for this home, dated February 13, 2024 to April 2, 2026. 2 of the 2 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Unsubstantiated” (2). 2 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word. Summary composed by computer from the 2 complaint reports below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

Beside homes the same size

  • Type A citations0typical 0
  • Type B citations0typical 0
  • Substantiated allegations0typical 0
  • Total complaints2typical 0

“Typical” is the statewide median across the 6,808 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this licence since 2019.

Year by year
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated20262202025220202423020221102021110

The last 36 months — 7 of 9 documents

20262 state visits · 2 documents
Apr 2, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff failed to meet resident's hygiene needs. Facility pool is unclean. Staff are not meeting resident's medical needs.

On April 2, 2026, the California Department of Social Services/Community Care Licensing (CDSS/CCL) Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Antonine Richard conducted an unannounced follow-up complaint visit. The LPA met with the Administrator (A1), Helen Ramirez, and (A2) Jose Ricardo Ramirez, and explained that the purpose of the visit was to investigate the allegations mentioned above. The investigation consisted of collecting records and observing the facility. The Department obtained various documents, including the Personnel Report LIC 500 (dated 01/17/26), the Resident Roster (dated 01/30/26), service records for VA Home Health Aid dated 2026, Identification and Emergency Information LIC 601, Face Sheet & Emergency Info, Service Plan, Resident Appraisal LIC 603A, Medical Assessment for Residential Care Facilities for the Elderly LIC 602A, and other relevant records related to this complaint. On 10/19/2023, the department interviewed Advance Medical Support (AMS) and residents (R1). On 04/02/2026, the department interviewed the Administrator A1, and A2, one staff (S1), and five residents (R2-R6) and facility's scheduled appointments. Unsubstantiated Allegation #1: Staff failed to meet the resident’s hygiene needs. The complaint alleged that the facility failed to ensure that the resident's (R1) personal care hygiene needs were met. The residents are decent but unclean. On 04/02/2026, between 8:30 am and 10:15 am, the department interviewed the Administrator (A1), who denied the allegation. A1 stated that three residents (R2, R4, and R6) need help showering, and the Veteran Administration Home Health Aide (AVHHA) comes to the facility to assist them three times a week. However, R3 and R5 are independent and can shower themselves. The staff helps all residents with daily hygiene. The department also interviewed another Administrator (A2), who denied the allegation and stated that staff assist residents who need help, even if they do not ask. Since residents cannot be forced if they refuse, staff continue to let them know they are available to help. One staff member (S1) was also interviewed; S1 denied the allegation and stated that staff help all residents with hygiene unless they refuse. During the visit on October 19, 2023, the department interviewed residents (R1), who denied the allegation and stated that R1 showers whenever R1 wants. On April 2, 2026, the department also interviewed five residents (R2-R6), all of whom denied that staff assisted them with hygiene needs. They also stated they have the right to refuse any help if they wish. On the same day, the department reviewed the facility records for the (AVHHA) schedule, which showed that (AVHHA) visits the facility three times a week. The department then toured the facility and found a storage area full of hygiene products, as well as a bathroom stocked with hygiene products for residents to use. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance to prove the alleged violation (s) did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is Unsubstantiated. Allegation #2: The facility pool is unclean. The complaint claimed that the backyard swimming pool had green, moldy water and was uncovered. On April 2, 2026, between 8:30 am and 10:15 am, the department interviewed the Administrator (A1), who denied the allegation and said that the facility is no longer using the pool. The department toured the facility inside and outside; it observed a lock on the backyard where the pool is located and noted that the pool was empty and clean. The department interviewed the Administrator (A2), who stated that the facility is in the process of covering the pool because they do not plan to use it. The department also spoke with five residents (R2-R6), who said they do not go outside to the pool because it has no water, and the gate is closed. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance to prove the alleged violation (s) did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is Unsubstantiated. Allegation #3: Staff is not meeting the resident’s medical needs. The complaint alleged that the facility failed to follow up on medical appointments. The department interviewed the Administrator (A1), who denied the allegation and stated that the social worker schedules the doctor appointments and that the staff takes residents to those appointments. We have a doctor scheduled to see each resident. Sometimes, we receive instructions from the doctor regarding follow-up visits. The department also interviewed the Administrator (A2), who denied the allegation and stated that both A1 and A2 take residents to their appointments. The department interviewed five residents (R2-R6), all of whom said that staff usually take them to their doctor appointments or social worker visits. R3 mentioned they are leaving now for a doctor's appointment. During the visit on October 19, 2023, residents (R1) denied the allegation, stating that they attend all of their doctor appointments. Additionally, during that visit, the department interviewed Advanced Medical Support (AMS) about resident (R1), who confirmed that R1 did not miss any scheduled appointments and noted that one appointment was rescheduled for the same day with a virtual appointment instead of an in-person visit. On April 2, 2026, the department reviewed the facility’s scheduled doctor appointments for all residents, including the dates they attended and their upcoming appointment dates. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation (s) did or did not occur; therefore, the allegation is unsubstantiated. No deficiencies were cited. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of the report was provided to Administrator Helen Ramirez.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 2, 2026 · control 18-AS-20231016124246
Feb 13, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

On 02/13/2026, Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Aziz Faizi and Abdoulaye Zerbo made an unannounced visit to the facility to conduct a required annual inspection. LPAs were greeted and granted entry by caregiver Elvira Neronamangabat who was informed of the purpose of the visit. The administrators joined the visit at a later time. The facility is a one-story home with six (6) bedrooms and three (3) bathrooms, including an empty pool. The pool gates were locked and the fence meets the height requirements. LPAs toured the facility's exterior and observed outdoor pathways were free of obstructions. Outdoor shaded seating area is available for the clients in care. The physical plant, including floors, windows, and doors, was clean and well maintained. Fixtures and furniture were in good repair. LPAs toured the kitchen and observed the facility has a two-day supply of perishable foods and seven-day supply of non-perishable foods, which are stored in a safe and healthy manner. LPAs observed the laundry equipment to be in good working condition. Sharp and dangerous objects were securely locked and inaccessible to residents. Restrooms were clean and had toilet paper, paper towels, and soap readily available for resident. Chemicals, cleaning solutions and disinfectants were securely locked and inaccessible to residents. Both the smoke detector and carbon monoxide detector were operational, and the hot water temperature was 120.0°F. LPAs observed fire extinguishers to be in compliance with the department's requirements with the expiration date of 12-31-27. Continued on LIC809-C.... Adequate staff were present to supervise clients during the visit. The administrator holds a current administrator’s certificate with the expiration date of 2/19/2027 and a CPR certification with the expiration date of 01-28-28. LPAs reviewed files for three (3) staff members, confirming criminal clearances, updated training, and CPR/First Aid certification. Three (3) residents files were reviewed and some documents were missing. Administrator agreed to send all required documentation by 2/27/2026.. All client medications were securely locked. LPAs reviewed medications for three clients, confirming that all medications were listed on the Medication Administration Record (MAR) and accounted for. LPAs reviewed the facility’s infection control plan, the emergency and disaster plan, including documentation of the last emergency drill conducted on 12/09/2025, which met department requirements. All facility exits were clear of obstructions. No deficiencies were cited per title 22. An exit interview was conducted, during which this report was reviewed and a copy was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 13, 2026
20252 state visits · 2 documents
Mar 17, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Deficiencies

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Javina George made an unannounced case management deficiencies visit. LPA requested the file for Resident #1 (R1) and was informed that there was no file at the facility due to R1 being discharged. LPA was unable to review the file requested. Deficiency cited. Based on today's visit a citation will be issued in accordance with the California Code of Regulations (Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8) on the attached 809D. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report, appeal rights, LIC9098-Proof of Corrections form and LIC811-Confidential names list was reviewed and provided to Elvira Mangabat, Caregiver.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 17, 2025

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87506(e) · Plan of correction due date: Mar 31, 2025

87506 Resident Records (e) Original records or photographic reproductions shall be retained for a minimum of three (3) years following termination of service to the resident. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: R1s resident file was not at the facility, or brought to the facility for LPA to review during today's visit, which poses a potential health, safety and personal rights risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 17, 2025

Plan of correction: The licensee agrees to provide the full file, including MARs for C1 for LPA to review. The file can be emailed and scanned, or copies dropped at the regional office. Proof of POC is to be submitted to the department by 5pm on the due date indicated.

Feb 19, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

On 02/19/25 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Javina George made an unannounced visit to the facility to conduct a 1 year required visit. LPA was greeted and granted entry by Caregiver Elvira Mangabat, the Administrator's Jose and Helen Ramirez arrived shortly after. The facility has an approved hospice waiver for (1) with (0) residents currently receiving hospice services. At the time of the visit there was (3) staff and (6) residents present. LPA verified the contact information for the facility that is on file with the department. LPA conducted a tour of the interior and exterior and upon exiting the car there was an odor of sewage outside per Administrator there is a clog with the line, and someone is due to come out and service it tomorrow 2/20/25. The administrator agreed to show proof of service to the department no later than 5pm on Friday 02/21/25. The facility was observed to have running water, and the smoke and carbon monoxide detectors were observed to be operable. The facility was observed to have several cob webs throughout the facility in the window sills, in the hallway hanging from fixtures. The medications were observed to be locked inside a closet inside the hallway by the kitchen. LPA observed for there to be (3) bottles of liquid medication and (1) vile of liquid medication, that was siting in a small box on table inside the hallway. The medication was moved and locked in the closet during the visit. Emergency disaster drills are being conducted on a quarterly basis, the last drill was conducted on 01/29/25. The facility has pool that is drained, there is a fully charged fire extinguisher. There are no known guns or ammunition on the premises. File review: The administrator's Jose and Helen did not have their files available to review at the time of the inspection. In addition there was no staff present with valid CPR certification, deficiencies cited. Resident files had the appropriate assessments and appraisals as well as admissions agreements. All staff present had criminal record clearance and were observed to be associated to the facility. The facility had a sufficient food supply 2 days of perishables and 7 days of non perishable food items. Based on today's inspection a citation will be issued on the attached 809D, in accordance with the California Code of Regulations (Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8). An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report, appeal rights, LIC9098-Proof of Corrections form and LIC 811- Confidential names list was provided to Helen Ramirez.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 19, 2025
20242 state visits · 3 documents
Feb 13, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not have required training Staff did not treat residents with dignity

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sabel Martinez conducted an unannounced follow-up investigation visit and delivered complaint findings. The LPA introduced himself and disclosed the purpose of the visit to Caregiver Elvira Mangabat. Administrator Raymond Ramirez arrived during the visit and assisted the LPA. Throughout the investigation, the Department secured pertinent records and conducted interviews with sources. It was alleged the staff did not have the required training. It was reported to the Department staff were assisting residents with medications. Interviews with multiple sources did not reveal concerns with lack of assistance from staff. Records obtained from the facility revealed care staff had received medication assistance training. (See LIC 9099C for continuation of report.) Unsubstantiated It was alleged staff did not treat residents with dignity. A source reported to the Department staff had treated a resident in a mean way. This source did not provide any specific action from staff, nor a timeframe. Interviews with several sources did not reveal any concerns with staff not treating residents with dignity, and revealed staff treated residents well. Sources also revealed residents may have raised their voices at staff and other residents. Based on the evidence gathered throughout the investigation, the allegations were unsubstantiated. An exit interview was conducted with Administrator Ramirez, to whom a copy of this report, and Licensee/Appeals Rights (LIC 9058), were provided via electronic mail. An electronic mail read receipt confirms the documents were received by Ramirez.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 13, 2024 · control 08-AS-20201014134932
Feb 13, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Other

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sabel Martinez conducted an unannounced case management visit. The LPA introduced himself and disclosed the purpose of the visit to Administrator Raymond Ramirez. During the visit, the LPA secured reports signatures and delivered an amended report. An exit interview was conducted with Administrator Ramirez, to whom a copy of this report, and Licensee/Appeals Rights (LIC 9058), were provided via electronic mail. An electronic mail read receipt confirms the documents were received by Ramirez.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 13, 2024
Feb 8, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

On February 08, 2024, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Venus Mixson arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct the required annual inspection and interviewed the Administrator, Jose Ramirez, via the telephone. The facility file review was conducted in the office and additional records were requested and reviewed on site. The facility is licensed for six elderly adults and is operating at full capacity. LPA met with the Lead Caregiver Elvira. LPA Mixson toured the facility along with Lead Caregiver, Elvira Mangabat and inspected the facility inside and outside. There were no obstructions to the indoor or outdoor passageways currently at the time of this visit. The facility is a single-story home, located at 29531 Mactan RD, Valley Center, CA 92082. Physical Plant: The facility phone number is (858) 610-4098 and is operable. The LPA observed the residents’ bedrooms, and they are equipped with required furniture as per Title 22. The LPA inspected facility bathrooms, and the hot water temperature tested within regulations. The bathrooms were clean, and appliances were operating appropriately currently at the time of this visit. The facility is equipped with operating smoke detectors, carbon monoxide alarms, and fire extinguishers. The LPA observed required postings such as "If you See Something, Say Something" the "Personal Rights" and the Ombudsman postings were posted in a common area. The cleaning supplies and sharp items were kept locked and inaccessible to the residents in care. There was a designated storage space for the resident and staff files, and it was locked. Medications: were reviewed, locked and inaccessible to residents, and there was a 30-day supply. The overall facility is clean, the furniture is in good condition. The facility heating system and other appliances were operable currently at the time of this visit. Food Service: Non-perishable and perishable food supply is sufficient per regulations, and there are a variety of food types available for residents. Dishes and utensils were in sufficient supply and stored properly. Care & Supervision Facility has sufficient staff, one staff at the time of this visit and the staff were engaging the residents with a meal and ADL's. Records Review: The LPA reviewed staff and resident files, conducted staff and resident interviews, and reviewed previous Community Care Licensing forms. There were no Title 22, Division 6 Regulation violations observed or cited during today’s visit. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report was given to the Lead Caregiver, Elvira Manabat.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 8, 2024
What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedthere was not enough evidence to prove a violation occurred — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe evidence showed the allegation was false, could not have happened, or had no reasonable basisType A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗

An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents and the questions below stand in their place.

Life here

Rooms, meals, the rhythm of a day, faith and language, pets and house rules — as the home describes them. Tap any detail for its source and date; nothing here is graded.

The home has not described daily life anywhere we have reviewed yet — that is the case for most small homes, and it says nothing about the home. These questions fill in the picture; keep the ones that matter to you.

Before you call

Ask every home the same questions — the state’s record does not answer these. Keep the ones that matter and they travel with your saved homes.

  1. What is included in the monthly rate, and what costs extra?
  2. Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?
  3. Which rooms does the non-ambulatory approval cover, and what transfer support is provided?
  4. What could change whether someone can stay here?
  5. Can we see a bedroom and share a meal during a visit?

Other homes nearby

The nearest licensed homes in San Diego County, closest first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.

Explore San Diego County