Illustration — no photo of this home on file yet

Peninsula Reflections

Large community·Licensed for 57·Colma, California

Licensed since 2016Licence #415600976
  • Care approvals on fileWheelchair · Dementia · HospiceState licensing record · September 27, 2026
  • Estimated starting rate$6,150 a monthCovelight estimate · likely $4,800–$7,800
  • Home sizeLicensed for 57Large care community · a licensed care home (RCFE)
  • Room at the last state visit35 of 57 beds occupiedDecember 5, 2025 · not a current opening
  • Ways to payAsk the homeMedi-Cal ALW participation not on file
  • Last state visitAugust 13, 2026CDSS inspection record

Peninsula Reflections is a large care community in Colma — a licensed residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE), the licence category behind “assisted living” and “board and care.” It is licensed for 57 residents since 2016. Bedridden care is not on file.

Built from CDSS public records · September 27, 2026. Every fact below names its source and date.

Quick answers and the state record

A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

Quick answers about Peninsula Reflections

Is Peninsula Reflections licensed?

The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

How many residents is Peninsula Reflections licensed for?

57 residents — a large community, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Has Peninsula Reflections been cited?

1 Type A and 0 Type B citation since 2016, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. Those records count 19 state visits over the same years.

Is Peninsula Reflections still open?

This license was on the CDSS roster as of September 28, 2026.

What does Peninsula Reflections cost?

$6,150 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $4,800–$7,800. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 19 communities with 50 or more beds within 9 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

Among 20 other homes of a similar licensed size across San Mateo County that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $4,725 to $8,107 a month, and the middle figure is $6,385 (n = 20 other homes publishing a starting rate).

Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.

A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.

The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.

A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.

Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.

Does Peninsula Reflections take Medi-Cal?

On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.

Who holds the license?

The license is held by Claremont Retirement Management Services Inc., per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Is there a hospital nearby?

AHMC Seton Medical Center is 1.1 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.

Can Peninsula Reflections keep a resident on hospice?

Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 10 residents, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Peninsula Reflections license and inspection record

  • Name on the license: “PENINSULA REFLECTIONS”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
  • License #415600976. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • Licensed for 57 residents — a large community, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • Licensed to Claremont Retirement Management Services Inc., per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • First licensed in 2016, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • 19 state inspection visits since 2016, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • 1 Type A and 0 Type B citation on file since 2016, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. The same records count 19 state visits in that period.
  • 7 complaints and 1 substantiated allegation on file since 2016, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
  • The most recent state visit on file is August 13, 2026, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
Type A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗

See the state’s own record

Can they support the care needed?

California licenses a home for specific kinds of care. The state’s record lists what this home is approved for; the home’s own answers fill in what changes as needs change.

  • Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved · covers up to 57 residents
  • Dementia / memory careApproved by the state
  • Hospice careApproved · covers up to 10 residents
  • BedriddenNot on file · ask the home

State licensing record · September 27, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.

Read the state’s own wording
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. APPROVED FOR 57 NON-AMBULATORY OF WHICH 20 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. MAXIMUM OF 6 NON-AMBULATORY AND NO BEDRIDDEN ALLOWED ON SECOND FLOOR. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 10 RESIDENTS.

983 - RCFE / DEMENTIA

CDSS record, verbatim · September 27, 2026

As needs change

  • Staying through hospice

    Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 10 — care may continue at the end of life

    Ask: “If hospice is needed, can care continue here until the end?”

    State licensing record · September 27, 2026

  • If memory loss develops

    Dementia-care designation on file

    Ask: “Can we read the dementia care disclosure and discuss how daily support works?”

    State licensing record · September 27, 2026

3 more questions to ask the home
  • Two-person transfers or a lift

    Not on file

    Ask: “If two people or a lift are needed to transfer, can the person stay?”

  • Someone awake overnight

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?”

  • Medicines

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who manages the medicines, and what happens when a dose is missed?”

Care & day-to-day support

These are the home’s own statements about its day-to-day practice — they are not part of the state licensing record, and the state has not approved or reviewed them.

Nights & staffing

  • Nurse coverageNurse on Staff (Part time)

    Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

What it costs here

Covelight estimate

$6,150a month to start

Likely $4,800–$7,800

From 19 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file

Likely monthly total

$6,150a month

Likely $4,800–$7,950

With a studio and basic help.

An estimate for planning, not a quote. The price is made in the phone call.

See the full cost breakdownRoom, care and fees · how people pay · how this estimate works
Room
Daily care
Sharing the room
  • Starting monthly rate$6,150likely $4,800–$7,800

    Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 19 communities with 50 or more beds within 9 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

  • Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600

    Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (45 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).

  • One-time move-in fee$2,000one time · likely $0–$4,000

    Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,000 (134 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.

Likely monthly totalLikely $4,800–$7,950
$6,150
First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $5,700–$10,850
$8,150

Costs & moving in

  • Payment methodsCheck

    Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • VA benefits

    Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
  • Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
  • Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
  • SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
  • VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
  • Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
  • MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
If the money runs out, what Medi-Cal covers
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
  • The care level

    Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.

  • What is billed separately

    Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.

  • Move-in costs

    A one-time community fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.

  • Increases

    California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.

  • What is the full monthly cost for the room and care we need, and what does it include?
  • What would the next care level cost, and who decides when it changes?
  • What is billed separately, and is there a one-time fee or deposit at move-in?
  • Is any private-pay period required before another payment program can begin?
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 19 communities with 50 or more beds within 9 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

19 homes like this within 9 miles publish starting rates mostly between $4,100–$7,150.

  • Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
  • Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
  • Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
  • Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
  • We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
  • It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Show the 19 nearby homes behind this estimate

Where it is

  • 205 Collins Ave, Colma, CA 94014Address from the public record · September 27, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.

Opening the neighborhood map…

The state record

California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. Here are the dated documents and the state’s own words, beside what is typical for homes this size.

Since 2021, the state has filed 17 documents for this home, and its records count 19 visits since 2016. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated August 13, 2026.

On file since
2021
State visits
19
Most recent visit
August 13, 2026
Occupied · December 5, 2025 visit
35 of 57 bedsa count on that day, not an opening

We hold 8 complaint reports the state published for this home, dated September 2, 2021 to December 5, 2025. 8 of the 8 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Unfounded” (1), “Unsubstantiated” (7). 8 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word. Summary composed by computer from the 8 complaint reports below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

Beside homes the same size

  • Type A citations1typical 0
  • Type B citations0typical 1
  • Substantiated allegations1typical 2
  • Total complaints7typical 6

“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,354 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this licence since 2016.

Year by year
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated202622020253302024770202312020221102021220

The last 36 months — 12 of 17 documents

20262 state visits · 2 documents
Aug 13, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Incident

On 8/13/2026, LPA Grace Donato conducted an unannounced case management visit in relation to an incident that was reported on 7/31/2026. LPA met with Wellness Director (WD) Rowena Cancino & Executive Director Anna Allas and explained the purpose of the visit. An incident report was received by Licensing regarding a theft that occurred in the facility. A staff (S1) stole an item and pawned it. Facility was not aware of the incident until the family contacted the facility. When the facility was made aware, an investigation was started and the police was involved. The item were since returned to the family and S1 is no longer working in the facility. LPA is waiting for the police report to be made available. No citations issued today. Report is reviewed and copy is provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 13, 2026
Jul 3, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Incident

On 7/3/2026, LPA Grace Donato conducted an unannounced case management visit in relation to an incident that occurred on 6/15/2026. LPA met with Wellness Director (WD) Rowena Cancino & Executive Director Anna Allas and explained the purpose of the visit. An incident report was received by Licensing regarding a resident (R1) who was able to leave facility at around 3:30am. Resident was accompanied back by a police officer. LPA reviewed the facility video and LPA observed R1 to be forcing the door open to go out the facility. R1 repeatedly forced open the door until it opened. Based on interviews, WD mentioned that R1s routine is to play with the computer on the activity room around 3am then go back to the bedroom. Night staff, during this time, were doing routine rounds when R1 was observed not to be in the bedroom. Night staff right away went looking for the R1. Upon R1s return, staff assessed R1 and found no injuries. The facility has since updated R1s needs and services plan. R1 has no known wandering tendencies. No citations issued today. Report is reviewed and copy is provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 3, 2026
20253 state visits · 3 documents
Dec 5, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not answer residents calls for assistance Staff could not communicate with emergency personnel Staff did not have access to residents emergency paperwork for Emergency personnel

On December 5, 2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Komal Curley conducted an unannounced complaint visit to deliver the findings for the above allegations. LPA met with Activities Director, Nancy Medina and explained the purpose of the visit. Regarding the allegation, staff did not answer residents call for assistance, according to the reporting party, on June 16, 2025, emergency personnel responded to the facility for a resident (R1) complaining of body pain. According to the reporting party, when emergency personnel responded to the facility and went to the second floor, there were no staff member to be seen and R1 was yelling for yelp. In addition, reporting party indicated that R1 was yelling for help for over two hours with no staff attending R1's needs. During the investigation, LPA interviewed the staff on shift that night. According to Staff 1 (S1), he/she worked on the second floor, Staff 2 (S2) worked on the first floor and Staff 3 (S3) was working on both floors. S1 and S2 indicated that they did not hear R1 yelling for help. S1 stated that R1 was on his/her cell phone when he/she checked on R1. (continue to 9099C) Unsubstantiated In addition, S1 and S3 indicated that R1 wanted his/her medication, however they had to keep explaining to R1 that the medication he/she was requesting for is prescribed to be given once every 8 hours, however they made sure that R1 was being checked on every 1-2 hours. Regarding the allegation, staff could not communicate with emergency personnel, according to the reporting party, on June 16, 2025, when emergency personnel arrived to the facility, they requested R1's paperwork, however the staff was Spanish speaking only and radioed another staff member. During the investigation, LPA interviewed staff who were on shift on June 16, 2025. According to Staff 1 (S1), when emergency personnel arrived, S1 admitted he/she had to call S3, the med-tech on shift because S1 speaks Spanish and very little English. In addition, according to 3/3 staff interviewed, although they do not speak a lot of English, they are able to communicate and understand basic English. Regarding the allegation, staff did not have access to residents emergency paperwork for emergency personnel, according to the reporting party, on June 16, 2025, when emergency personnel responded to the facility, they requested for R1's file, however after 10 minutes of waiting, a firefighter went to the staff to see where the file was and was told by staff that they were on the phone with someone (unknown) trying to figure out to to get R1's file. During the investigation, LPA interviewed staff on shift and observed the med-tech room where all resident files are located. Based on observations, LPA observed all resident files available and located in the med-tech office room. According to S3, he/she indicated that normally when staff call 911, the updated system papers are printed and ready for emergency personnel, however, the night of June 16, 2025, R1 called 911 without staff knowing and the papers were not ready so S3 had to go to the med-tech room and print R1's paperwork which took some time as the S3 indicated he/she was experiencing printer issues. According to S3, although it took time to print R1's paperwork, it was eventually printed and provided to emergency personnel. Based on interviews conducted and information collected, the department has determined that although the above allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the above allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED. Report is reviewed with the Activities Director and a copy is provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 5, 2025 · control 14-AS-20250701130341
Nov 5, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Due to staff neglect, resident sustained a pressure injury Staff retained a resident with a prohibited health condition Staff did not notify authorized representative of change in condition

On November 5, 2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Komal Curley conducted an unannounced complaint visit to deliver the findings for the above allegations. LPA met with Administrator, Anna Allas and explained the purpose of the visit. Regarding the allegation, due to staff neglect, resident sustained a pressure injury in care, according to the reporting party, on May 14, 2025, a Registered Nurse (RN) from Home Health found pressure wounds on Resident 1’s (R1’s) feet and an open Stage IV sacral pressure wound. The facility’s LVN was educated on wound care and staff were reminded to ensure R1 is being repositioned and monitored for hydration and eating for wound healing and overall health, however according to reporting party it was observed that R1 sat in a wheelchair for 6-8 hours a day before the wound was reported on May 14, 2025. During the investigation, LPA interviewed the administrator, staff, reviewed R1’s file; including but not limited to, service plan, home health notes, hospice notes, charting notes, repositioning log, etc. According to the administrator, when R1 was admitted to the facility, R1 did not have any wounds or pressure injuries, however there was redness on R1’s sacrum that was noted. (continue to 9099C) Unsubstantiated On 3/16/25, a nurse from Sutter Care Home came to assess R1 for the appropriate services that's required for R1's needs. Based on the nurse's assessment from Sutter Care, R1 was admitted to hospice on 3/22/25. R1's responsible party revoked hospice services on 4/6/25. Starting 4/1/25, home health started visiting R1 for physical therapy and continued to come 1-2x a week for leg exercises. Based on R1's progress notes reviewed, on 5/9/25, the facility observed an open wound on R1's sacrum. The facility notified R1's physician and the physician ordered home health to evaluate R1's wound. On 5/14/25, R1 was assessed by Sutter Care at Home who indicated that R1 had a pressure ulcer to sacrum. According to staff interviewed, the facility notified R1's physician, responsible party, and updated R1's care plan. Based on R1's care plan, the facility repositioned R1 every two hours, followed the treatment plan that was provided by home health, and monitored R1 for any changes of condition. In addition, home health was coming 2-3x a week for wound care. Based on the repositioning log, R1 was being repositioned every two hours. According to interviews conducted, med-techs were instructed to call hospice when R1's dressing needed to be changed or was soiled if the facility LVN was not present at the facility. In addition, according to the administrator, R1 had a one-on-one caregiver 24/7 who was also trained to change R1's dressing. Regarding the allegation, staff retained a resident with a prohibited health condition, according to the reporting party, on 5/14/25, R1 was found to have an open stage IV sacral pressure wound. During the investigation, LPA interviewed the administrator and reviewed R1’s file. According to documents reviewed, on 5/23/25, a wound nurse came to visit R1 and determined R1's sacral wound was unstageable. According to the Department's and facility's records reviewed, after the administrator was notified that the sacrum pressure injury was unstageable on 5/23/25, an exception request was submitted to Community Care Licensing the same day to request for the facility to continue providing care to R1 who had a prohibited health condition. Regarding the allegation, staff did not notify authorized representative of change in condition, on May 14, 2025, it was found that R1 had pressure wounds on his/her feet and an open stage IV sacral pressure wound, however R1’s authorized representative was not notified about the wound until May 21, 2025. (Continue to 9099C) During the investigation, LPA interviewed the administrator, reviewed home health notes, R1's charting notes, progress notes, and service plan. Based on home health document dated 5/14/25, R1 was observed to have a pressure ulcer to the sacrum. According to the administrator and service plan reviewed dated 5/14/25, the LVN updated the service plan due to change of condition, in specific to active pressure ulcer on heel and sacrum. Based on the progress reports and charting notes reviewed, R1's responsible party was contacted on 5/16/25 regarding the presence of the sacral wound. Based on interviews conducted, documents reviewed, and information collected, the department has determined that although the above allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the above allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED. Report is reviewed with the administrator and a copy is provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 5, 2025 · control 14-AS-20250722131624
Oct 20, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

On 10/20/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jaime Vado conducted an unannounced annual inspection visit. LPA met with the administrator Anna Allas and explained the purpose of today's visit. There are currently 35 residents in the facility during this inspection and multiple staff through out the facility. This is a multi-level facility, Age range 60 and over. Approved for 57 non-ambulatory of which 20 may be bedridden. Maximum of 6 non-ambulatory and no bedridden allowed on second floor. Hospice waiver for 10 residents. There are 5 residents under hospice care as of today's visit. The physical plant was toured inside and outside of the facility to ensure the safety of the clients. Large dining room is clean and organized for residents. LPA observed dining menu and activities calendar posted. LPA observed the facility kitchen which is clean and observed appliances are in good repair. Per staff, all appliances are in working condition. Knives are stored and locked and secured in the kitchen. Perishable and non-perishable food supplies are observed as in place. Kitchen grade fire extinguisher is observed as in place and with an inspection date of 03/29/2025. There are additional food supplies, emergency food supplies, freezers, PPE, and water stored in a storage building at the front of the property on Collins Ave. These are observed as in place. Next to that is another building where the marketing office and employee break room is located. First aid kits are observed as complete with required items as observed. Medications are observed to be locked in the medication rooms and medication cart. Cart is in place near the facility dining room to disperse medication to residents during meal times and is able to be brought through out the community. LPA observed multiple residents in the activity room with 2 staff present. Continued on next page... Page 2 LPA reviewed resident medications at random and observed them as current, stored correctly, and documented via electronic medication administration record system. LPA observed that there are multiple fire extinguishers in place on each floor with an inspection date of 03/29/2025. Smoke detectors, carbon monoxide detectors, and full fire sprinkler system is observed in place through out the facility. Central heating and air conditioning is in place. Laundry room is also observed as fully operational and organized. Lint areas are being cleaned on this day and LPA observed them as clear of lint. Emergency exit routes are observed inside and outside to be free and clear of obstructions. Evacuation chairs are in place in emergency exit stairwells as well. Last emergency/disaster drill was conducted in 07/24/2025. Water temperature was measured in resident rooms 20 and 35. Both were measured at 120F. LPA observed 5 resident rooms at random. All are observed to be free of odors and contained all the required furniture per regulatory recommendations. Resident linen supplies are observed as in place stored in various areas and in the laundry room. LPA reviewed five staff files and 5 resident files during today's inspection and all files are observed as current. Staff are actively conducting training and it is observed as current for the staff reviewed Administrator certificate is current expiring 05/01/2027. No citations issued. Report is reviewed with Anna Allas and a copy is provided on this day.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 20, 2025
20247 state visits · 7 documents
Dec 20, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Incident

On December 20, 2024, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Komal Charitra conducted an unannounced case management visit in relation to an incident that occurred on 12/6/24. LPA met with Activities Director, Nancy Medina and explained the purpose of the visit. The Licensee reported on 12/6/24, Resident 1 (R1) reported that Staff 1 (S1) threw a call light at him/her and his his/her head. According to R1, he/she told S1 that he/she will report S1 to the facility. S1 told R1 that if he/she reported S1 to the facility, he/she will kill R1. 911 was called. The facility assessed R1 for any visible injuries. No injuries were notes. Facility spoke to R1's responsible party who indicated that R1 says things like that even when R1 was at home. In addition, R1's responsible party indicated that whatever R1 said did not happen. During the visit, LPA attempted to interview R1, reviewed R1's file and interviewed the Activities Director. According to the Activities Director, this was an alleged incident and the facility found no evidence to prove that S1 actually did hit R1 with a call light. In addition, according to the Activities Director, R1 has dementia. LPA reviewed R1's file. Based on documentation reviewed, R1 has a diagnosis of dementia, and gets confused, aggressive and has inappropriate behaviors. LPA attempted to interview R1 but due to the language barrier and dementia diagnosis, LPA was not able to get much information from R1. R1 mentioned he likes the staff here and does not have many issues at this facility. No citations are issued during the visit. LPA reviewed report with the Activities Director and a copy is provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 20, 2024
Sep 30, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Incident

On September 30, 2024, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Komal Charitra conducted an unannounced case-management visit to follow up on an incident that occurred on 9/21/24. LPA met with Activities Director, Nancy Medina and explained the purpose of the visit. On September 24, 2024, Licensee reported that Resident 1 (R1) was found outside along the driveway of the facility. According to the Licensee, a bystander observed R1 climbing the metal gate and was able to get out. Bystander was trying to redirect R1 until staff came out to get R1. Skin abrasions were noted. During the visit today, LPA conducted interviews and reviewed R1's file. According to file reviewed, R1 has a diagnosis of Alzheimer's Dementia and is unable to leave the facility unassisted. LPA did not observe any reappraisal for R1 after R1 eloped on 9/21/24. In addition, during the file review, LPA observed that R1's physician's report is dated from 2/28/23. Facility failed to ensure an updated annual medical assessment/ physician's report is maintained in R1's file. According to the Administrator, R1 used the exit door in the dining room and gained access to the courtyard and climbed up the metal gate. In addition, the administrator was unable to provide information on why the staff didn't hear the auditory alarm when R1 opened the exit door and why staff was unable to respond immediately. Based on staff interviewed, it was indicated that staff were assisting other residents and was unable to respond immediately. During the visit today, LPA opened the exit door in the dining room to ensure alarms were on and functioning. It was observed the alarm was on and in good repair. Deficiency of the RCFE California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8 is observed and cited on a following page. Report is reviewed with Activities Director and a copy is provided with appeal rights.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 30, 2024

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87464(f)(1) · Plan of correction due date: Oct 7, 2024

87464 Basic Services (f)- Basic services shall at a minimum include: (1) Care and supervision as defined in Section 87101(c)(3) and Health and Safety Code section 1569.2(c). Violation of this regulation is not met as evidenced by: Based on file reviewed, it was noted R1 has a diagnosis of late onset Alzheimer's dementia and is unable to leave the facility unassisted. In addition, based on staff interviewed, the alarm did turn on when R1 opened the exit door in the dining room, however staff were assisting other residents and was not able to respond timely. Nevertheless, facility failed to ensure there was proper supervision resulting in R1 eloping from the facility.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 30, 2024

Plan of correction: Facility will conduct in-service training with staff regarding elopmenet protocols and submit a copy of the training log to LPA by 10/7/24.

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR87705(c)(5) · Plan of correction due date: Oct 7, 2024

87705 Care of Persons with Dementia (c) Licensees who accept and retain residents with dementia shall be responsible for ensuring the following: (5) Each resident with dementia shall have an annual medical assessment as specified in Section 87458, Medical Assessment, and a reappraisal done at least annually... Violation of this regulation is not met as evidenced by: During file reviews, LPA observed R1 has a diagnosis of late onset Alzheimer's Dementia and the medical assessment/physician's report maintained in R1's file is from 2/28/2023. Facility failed to ensure an updated annual medical assessment/ physician's report is maintained in R1's file.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 30, 2024

Plan of correction: Facility to contact R1's physician to get a new updated physician's report and send a copy to LPA by 10/7/24.

Sep 17, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

On September 17, 2024, Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Kiran Jain and Komal Charitra arrived at the facility at 09:15 AM to conduct the Annual 1-year required inspection. LPAs met with Nancy Medina, Activity Director and explained the purpose of the visit. Anna Allas, Administrator joined shortly after. LPAs toured the physical plant and observed it to be clean and odor-free at a comfortable temperature. This is a two-story building with 21 resident bedrooms, 21 bathrooms, a dining room, a living room, an activity area, a storage/supply room, a kitchen, a laundry room, a medication room, and offices on the first level. The second level has 13 resident bedrooms, 13 bathrooms, storage rooms, and a spa room. Delayed Egress was observed to be working properly at the main entrance door. Auditory devices were observed to be in place to monitor all exits. No accessible bodies of water or hazards were observed. Video surveillance was observed only in the hallways and common areas of the facility. The fire extinguishers were fully charged and last serviced on April 2024. The smoke detector and carbon monoxide detector were fully operational. LPAs inspected resident’s rooms and bathrooms at random. Rooms were observed to be clean with the required furniture and sufficient lighting. The bathrooms were observed to be mold-free and equipped with grab bars, liquid soap, and paper towels. The hot water temperature in the resident's bathroom was measured on the first floor in room 10 at 108.6°F. Hot water temperature was also measured on the second floor in room 23 at 118.4°F. Sharp objects, detergents, poisons, and soap were observed to be locked and inaccessible to persons in care. No expired food items were observed. The facility had the required 7 days of non-perishables and 2 days of perishables. LPAs reviewed five resident records and five staff records. All were observed to be complete. Emergency drills are conducted monthly with the last drill documented on September 2024. The resident’s medications are securely stored in a locked cart/cabinet/refrigerator. Medication administration records (MARs) were reviewed, and no expired medications were observed. The First Aid kit was checked and observed to be complete. The following updated forms are requested to be submitted to CCLD by 09/24/2024: · LIC500: Personnel Report · LIC308: Designation of Facility Responsibility · LIC400: Resident Cash Resources · Administrator Certificate · Current Liability Insurance No deficiencies were cited during today's visit. An exit interview was conducted. This report was reviewed with Anna Allas, Administrator, and a copy of this report was left at the facility.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 17, 2024
May 14, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: - Facility staff are attempting to illegally evict resident

On 05/14/2024, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jaime Vado conducted an unannounced complaint investigation visit to deliver findings regarding the allegations received. LPA met with the administrator Anna Allas and explained the purpose of today's visit. During the investigation LPA conducted interviews and reviewed pertinent documents regarding the resident's admission agreement and status at the facility. According to documentation reviewed show that the resident was not formally evicted by the facility until 05/13/2024 with an formal eviction notice. The resident is under respite services under contract with him/her hospital. The contract reviewed states that the contract is set to expire on 05/13/2024 and also advised on the initiation of sending him/her to the hospital to continue services due to the expiration of the contract. The facility did not initiate the eviction. Additionally it was found that the hospital the resident is under respite contract with discontinued the refills so the resident can utilize the insurance plan with San Francisco. The facility only initiated emergency services in order for the resident to receive the medication via hospital emergency room out of precaution due to the resident refusing to pay for the medication himself/herself. It was not to evict per interviews. This allegation is unfounded. This agency has investigated the complaint alleging: Facility staff are attempting to illegally evict resident. We have found that the complaint was unfounded, meaning that the allegation was false, could not have happened and/or is without a reasonable basis. We have therefore dismissed the complaint. Report is reviewed with administrator. Copy is provided. Unfoundedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 14, 2024 · control 14-AS-20240510114244
Apr 26, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: - Staff are mismanaging resident's medication

On 04/26/2024, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jaime Vado conducted an unannounced complaint investigation visit to deliver findings regarding the allegations received. LPA met with the admininstrator Anna Allas and explained the purpose of today's visit. During the course of the investigation LPA conducted interviews, made facility observations, and reviewed records. Per records reviewed regarding medication, the medication is marked as being administered accurately. Interviews with staff indicate that the resident did swallow the medication when it was provided and the med tech spoke to the resident during this time to ensure it was swallowed. The med tech confirmed this observation. Due to contradicting interview details this allegation is unsubstantiated. Based on these observations, the above allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED. Although the allegations may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the above allegations are unsubstantiated at this time. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 26, 2024 · control 14-AS-20240214151800
Feb 15, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Incident

On 02/15/2024, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jaime Vado conducted an unannounced case management - incident visit regarding a police visit to the facility made on this day in the morning hours. LPA met with administrator Anna Allas and explained the purpose of today's visit. During complaint visit made on this day regarding complaint #14-AS-20240214151800. LPA was informed by Anna that the police department came to the facility in the morning hours today regarding medications that R1 supposedly had and where it came from and also the room door of R1 being locked. Staff demonstrated to the officer how the room is unlockable from the outside and how they unlock it. Responding officer provided the facility with a police report number regarding the visit. Police took no further actions during the visit. Facility will provide an incident regarding the police visit. F No citations issued. Report reviewed with Anna.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 15, 2024
Feb 7, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: - Staff did not prevent another resident from entering resident's room - Staff do not respond to residents' call buttons in timely manner - Staff are unable to communicate with residents due to a language barrier - Staff do not prevent another resident from waking resident - Staff put a resident in residents room that is not compatable with resident.

On 02/07/2024, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jaime Vado conducted an unannounced complaint investigation visit in order to deliver findings regarding the allegations received. LPA met with Nancy Medina and explained the purpose of today's visit. During the investigation LPA conducted interviews and reviewed resident documents. The resident entering the room of R1 had dementia. This facility is an all dementia facility and rooms do have locks that are accessible by staff via key, but for safety reasons staff do not lock doors. As a result of the resident entering the room of R1, staff began to close and lock the door of R1 as requested by R1 since R1 does not have dementia. Call button requests made by R1 were met to the best of the facilities abilities as there are cargivers assigened to groups of residents. Staff responded accordingly based on operational needs and requirements at the times the requests were made. A delay may have incurred, but not based in intent, but staff availability to respond as staff do help other residents in care. R1 does not have one on one caregiving. Continued on next page... Unsubstantiated Page 2 - LIC9099 Staff in the facility are able to communicate to residents as necessary. Some staff do have difficulty but not to the point of not understanding. Those staff with a language barrier, do have resources such as other staff to assist in translation, and have the ability to communicate using translation devices. R1's room mate was diagnosed with dementia and would wake up at random hours during the night due to diagnosis such as sundowning. As a result, the facility moved the room mate and provided R1 with a private room despite only paying for a single bed, not a double, and was able to stay in the room for the duration of their time of the facility. The room mate was deemed compatible at the time of assessmentsm but when the room mates behavior changed, the facility moved the room mate to a better compatible room which provided R1 with their own room. The facility attempted to meet the needs of R1 at all times and made adjustments where needed. The facility communicated with R1 and the social worker of R1 to collaborate and continue to meet the needs and requests made by R1. These allegations are unsubstantiated. Based on these observations, the above allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED. Although the allegations may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the above allegations are unsubstantiated at this time. Report is reviewed with Nancy.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 7, 2024 · control 14-AS-20231113115810
What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedthere was not enough evidence to prove a violation occurred — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe evidence showed the allegation was false, could not have happened, or had no reasonable basisType A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗

An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents and the questions below stand in their place.

Life here

Rooms, meals, the rhythm of a day, faith and language, pets and house rules — as the home describes them. Tap any detail for its source and date; nothing here is graded.

Find a detail about life at this home.

Rooms & the spaces they will use

Meals, preferences & familiar food

  • Meals served in the room

    Reported on aplaceformom.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Vegetarian or vegan optionsVegetarian · Vegan

    Reported on aplaceformom.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Family may eat with the resident

    Reported on aplaceformom.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Cultural cuisine regularly servedInternational

    Reported on aplaceformom.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Meals provided

    Reported on aplaceformom.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Professional chef

    Reported on aplaceformom.com · seen September 9, 2026.

Activities & the rhythm of a day

  • Activity types offeredLive Dance or Theater Performances · BBQs or Picnics · Wine Tasting · Gardening Club · Live Well Programs · Art Classes · and 11 more

    Live Dance or Theater Performances · BBQs or Picnics · Wine Tasting · Gardening Club · Live Well Programs · Art Classes · Happy Hour · Birthday Parties · Karaoke · Cooking Classes · Live Musical Performances · Educational Speakers / Life Long Learning · Trivia Games · Pet-focused Programs · Holiday Parties · Activities On-site · Community Service Programs — reported on aplaceformom.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Trips outside the home

    Reported on aplaceformom.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Religious services at the home

    Reported on aplaceformom.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Intergenerational programs

    Reported on aplaceformom.com · seen September 9, 2026.

Faith, culture & language

  • Clergy or chaplain visits

    Reported on aplaceformom.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Languages spoken by caregiversEnglish

    Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

Pets, routines & independence

  • Residents may bring a pet

    Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Pet types allowedCats · Dogs

    Reported on aplaceformom.com · seen September 9, 2026.

Visiting & staying involved

  • Transportation costs extra

    Reported on aplaceformom.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Public transit access claimed

    Reported on aplaceformom.com · seen September 9, 2026.

Before you call

Ask every home the same questions — the state’s record does not answer these. Keep the ones that matter and they travel with your saved homes.

  1. What is included in the monthly rate, and what costs extra?
  2. Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?
  3. Which rooms does the non-ambulatory approval cover, and what transfer support is provided?
  4. What could change whether someone can stay here?
  5. Can we see a bedroom and share a meal during a visit?

Other homes nearby

The nearest licensed homes in San Mateo County, closest first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.

Explore San Mateo County