Illustration — no photo of this home on file yet

Paradise Manor

Small home·Licensed for 6·San Jose, California

Licensed since 1998Licence #435200465
  • Care approvals on fileWheelchairState licensing record · September 27, 2026
  • Estimated starting rate$3,750 a monthCovelight estimate · likely $3,050–$4,600
  • Home sizeLicensed for 6Small care home · a licensed care home (RCFE)
  • Room at the last state visit4 of 6 beds occupiedOctober 18, 2023 · not a current opening
  • Ways to payAsk the homeMedi-Cal ALW participation not on file
  • Last state visitFebruary 3, 2026CDSS inspection record

Paradise Manor is a small care home in San Jose — a licensed residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE), the licence category behind “assisted living” and “board and care.” It is licensed for 6 residents since 1998. Dementia care, hospice care and bedridden care are not on file.

Built from CDSS public records · September 27, 2026. Every fact below names its source and date.

Quick answers and the state record

A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

Quick answers about Paradise Manor

Is Paradise Manor licensed?

The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

How many residents is Paradise Manor licensed for?

6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Has Paradise Manor been cited?

1 Type A and 0 Type B citation since 1998, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. Those records count 7 state visits over the same years.

Is Paradise Manor still open?

This license was on the CDSS roster as of September 28, 2026.

What does Paradise Manor cost?

$3,750 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $3,050–$4,600. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 11 small homes and similar homes within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

Among 51 other homes of a similar licensed size in San Jose that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $3,525 to $4,875 a month, and the middle figure is $4,200 (n = 51 other homes publishing a starting rate).

Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.

A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.

The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.

A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.

Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.

Does Paradise Manor take Medi-Cal?

On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.

Who holds the license?

The license is held by Miguel, David R. & Lynda G., per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Is there a hospital nearby?

Regional Medical Center of San Jose is 2.8 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.

Can Paradise Manor keep a resident on hospice?

Not on file — the state’s record does not list hospice care on this license. Ask: “Can a resident stay here on hospice, and under what conditions?”

Paradise Manor license and inspection record

  • Name on the license: “PARADISE MANOR”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
  • License #435200465. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • Licensed for 6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • Licensed to Miguel, David R. & Lynda G., per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • First licensed in 1998, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • 7 state inspection visits since 1998, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • 1 Type A and 0 Type B citation on file since 1998, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. The same records count 7 state visits in that period.
  • 1 complaint and 1 substantiated allegation on file since 1998, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
  • The most recent state visit on file is February 3, 2026, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
Type A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗

See the state’s own record

Can they support the care needed?

California licenses a home for specific kinds of care. The state’s record lists what this home is approved for; the home’s own answers fill in what changes as needs change.

  • Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved · covers up to 6 residents
  • Dementia / memory careNot on file · ask the home
  • Hospice careNot on file · ask the home
  • BedriddenNot on file · ask the home

State licensing record · September 27, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.

Read the state’s own wording
LICENSED TO CARE 6 NON-AMBULATORY ELDERLY CLIENTS AGES 60 AND ABOVE.

935 - ELDERLY

CDSS record, verbatim · September 27, 2026

As needs change

5 questions to ask the home — nothing on file yet
  • Two-person transfers or a lift

    Not on file

    Ask: “If two people or a lift are needed to transfer, can the person stay?”

  • Someone awake overnight

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?”

  • Medicines

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who manages the medicines, and what happens when a dose is missed?”

  • Staying through hospice

    Hospice waiver not on file

    Ask: “If hospice is needed, can care continue here until the end?”

  • If memory loss develops

    Dementia-care designation not on file

    Ask: “If memory loss develops, what would change — and when would a move be needed?”

What it costs here

Covelight estimate

$3,750a month to start

Likely $3,050–$4,600

From 11 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file

Likely monthly total

$3,750a month

Likely $3,050–$4,800

With a shared room and basic help.

An estimate for planning, not a quote. The price is made in the phone call.

See the full cost breakdownRoom, care and fees · how people pay · how this estimate works
Room
Daily care
Sharing the room

Memory care is not priced here: a dementia-care designation is not on file for this home. Ask the home.

  • Starting monthly rate$3,750likely $3,050–$4,600

    Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 11 small homes and similar homes within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

  • Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600

    Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (45 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).

  • One-time move-in fee$2,000one time · likely $0–$4,000

    Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,000 (134 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.

Likely monthly totalLikely $3,050–$4,800
$3,750
First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $3,600–$8,050
$5,750
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
  • Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
  • Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
  • SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
  • VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
  • Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
  • MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
If the money runs out, what Medi-Cal covers
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
  • The care level

    Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.

  • What is billed separately

    Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.

  • Move-in costs

    A one-time community fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.

  • Increases

    California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.

  • What is the full monthly cost for the room and care we need, and what does it include?
  • What would the next care level cost, and who decides when it changes?
  • What is billed separately, and is there a one-time fee or deposit at move-in?
  • Is any private-pay period required before another payment program can begin?
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 11 small homes and similar homes within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

11 homes like this within 5 miles publish starting rates mostly between $2,500–$5,250.

  • Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
  • Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
  • Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
  • Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
  • We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
  • It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Show the 11 nearby homes behind this estimate

Where it is

  • 1645 Peachwood Drive, San Jose, CA 95132Address from the public record · September 27, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.

Opening the neighborhood map…

The state record

California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. Here are the dated documents and the state’s own words, beside what is typical for homes this size.

Since 2022, the state has filed 6 documents for this home, and its records count 7 visits since 1998. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated February 3, 2026.

On file since
2022
State visits
7
Most recent visit
February 3, 2026
Occupied · October 18, 2023 visit
4 of 6 bedsa count on that day, not an opening

We hold 1 complaint report the state published for this home, dated October 18, 2023. 1 of the 1 carries the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (1). 1 includes the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word. Summary composed by computer from the 1 complaint report below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

Beside homes the same size

  • Type A citations1typical 0
  • Type B citations0typical 0
  • Substantiated allegations1typical 0
  • Total complaints1typical 0

“Typical” is the statewide median across the 6,808 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this licence since 1998.

Year by year
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated20261102025110202411020232212022110

The last 36 months — 4 of 6 documents

20261 state visit · 1 document
Feb 3, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Steve Chang conducted an unannounced annual inspection visit, and met with Designated Administrator (ADM) Melanie Gavina. 2 staff were observed in the facility. 4 Residents went to day program. LPA checked 2 resident files and 2 staff files. LPA toured the facility inside out with ADM. Living room, family room, kitchen, dinning room and 4 restrooms were inspected. 4 single resident rooms, and laundry area were inspected. One staff live-in room was observed in the facility. Two day perishable food supplies and seven day nonperishable food supplies were observed sufficient. Medication closet, knives closet and cleaning product closet were observed locked. Room temperature was at 69 degree F, and hot water temperature was at 106 degree F in facility. Fire extinguisher was serviced on 6/8/2025. The temperature of freezer was observed at 0 degree F. The temperature of refrigerator was observed at 30 degree F. First aid box, night lights, and flash lights were observed in the facility. The last time the facility conducted the earth quake drill was on 1/3/26 and the fire alarm drill was on 1/4/26. The facility was equipped with fire alarm system, smoke and carbon monoxide detectors. Smoke detectors and carbon monoxide detectors were tested by ADM, and they were working fine. Front yard and backyard were inspected. There was no obstruction to block the walkways. One storage room was observed in the backyard. No citation noted today. Exit interview was conducted with ADM. This report was provided to ADM for signature. A copy of the report was provided to ADM.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 3, 2026
20251 state visit · 1 document
Feb 21, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Marcela Yanez conducted an unannounced Required 1 Year visit and met with Melanie Gavina Designated Administrator. During visit, LPA toured the facility inside and out. LPA toured the garage area and observed food storage areas and locked cabinets for cleaning supplies. LPA observed the kitchen area and observed locked cabinets for medications, sharp objects, and cleaning supplies. LPA observed perishable food supply of at least two days and a non-perishable food supply of at least seven days. Refrigerator temperature measured at 20 degrees F and freezer measured at -7 degrees F LPA toured four resident bedrooms. Each bedroom had available bedding and clothing storage areas as well as functioning lights. While touring resident bedroom R1 LPA observed medication belonging to R1 accessible to residents in care. R1 is not allowed to administer their own medication. Medication was removed and placed in locked cabinet. LPA toured 3 resident bathrooms. Each bathroom had available soap and paper towels and functioning lights. The water temperatures in the bathroom sinks measured with thermometer at 109 degrees F. LPA toured the outside area and found the exits to be clear of obstructions. LPA observed fire extinguisher was last serviced on 04/25/24. LPA reviewed Fire and Earthquake log was last disaster drill was last conducted on 01/04/25 and 01/05/25. LPA reviewed resident records for 2 resident. LPA reviewed 2 staff records and found them to be complete. ADM tested the smoke detectors in the hallway smoke detector to function properly when tested. Deficiencies were cited as per California Code of Regulations Title 22. This report was reviewed with Melanie Gavina Designated Administrator and a copy of this report and appeal rights were provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 21, 2025
20241 state visit · 1 document
Feb 15, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Manuel Monter conducted an unannounced annual inspection visit, and met with Lead staff Melanie Gavina (S1). During the visit, LPA observed 4 residents and 2 staff. S1 called Administrator (ADM) Lynda Miguel and ADM stated S1 could give LPA tour and sign on her behalf. LPA toured the facility inside out with S1 which included the Living room, kitchen, dining room, 4 restrooms and 4 residents bedrooms. The staff area of the facility was also inspected. The front yard and backyard were inspected. There was no obstruction to block the walkways. While touring resident bedroom #3, LPA observed 7 containers of dish washing detergent on the ground. While touring the bathroom #2, which is located across from bedroom #3, LPA observed a bottle of dish washing detergent. (Photographs were taken.) Two-day perishable food supplies and seven day nonperishable food supplies were observed. LPA observed the medication storage area, knives storage area, and cleaning product storage area as locked and inaccessible to residents in care. Room temperature was at 70 degrees F, and hot water temperature was measured at 118 degrees F in resident bathrooms. Fire extinguisher was serviced in May 10, 2023. The facility was equipped with smoke and carbon monoxide detectors. Smoke detectors was tested by S1, and were functional. LPA observed facility first aid kit and facility fire/earthquake drill log. The facility's last drill was on January 7, 2024. Page 1 out of 2. LPA reviewed facility records for 2 staff and 2 residents. While reviewing resident records, LPA discovered that residents R1, R2 and R3 are under the age of 60. LPA reviewed 2 resident medications and centrally stored medication records. LPA reviewed 2 residents P&I records. LPA conducted interviews with 2 staff (S1 to S2) and 2 residents (R1-R2). Deficiencies are being cited during today's visit, see LIC809-D. This report was reviewed with Lead staff Melanie Gavina and a copy of the signed report was provided. Page 2 out of 2.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 15, 2024
20231 state visit · 1 document
Oct 18, 2023Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: The facility bathroom has mold.

LIcensing Program ANalyst (LPA) Steve Chang conducted an unannounced investigation visit to deliver the invstigation finding and met with House Manager (HM) Melanie Gavina. On 12/21/2021, the Department received a complaint with the allegation that the facility bathroom has mold. On 12/27/2021, LPA conducted an initial investigation visit, toured the facility, inspected the food supplies, and interviewed ADM, 3 staff (S1 - S3), and 6 residents (R1 - R6). Continue on LIC9099-C. Page 1 of 2. Substantiated The facility bathroom has mold: On 12/27/2021, LPA interviewed 6 residents (R1 - R6). 5 out of 6 stated the staff cleaned the bedrooms and restrooms every day. 2 out of 6 residents stated there was mold on the top of the restroom. LPA interviewed Administrator (ADM) Lynda Miguel. ADM stated the facility staff cleaned all the residents' bedrooms and bathrooms every day. LPA toured the facility with S1 and ADM including the common area, 4 resident bedrooms and 3 restrooms. LPA found mold on the ceiling of one of the resident restrooms. LPA showed the mold on the ceiling of the restroom to S1. S1 agreed that it was mold. LPA showed the mold on the ceiling of the resident restroom, ADM admitted it was mold and stated the mold would be cleaned up by end of the day. Based on the observation and interviews, mold was found on the ceiling of one of the resident restrooms, and S1 and ADM admitted it was mold. The Department has investigated the above allegation. Based on observation, and interviews conducted, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met. Therefore, the Department found the above allegation to be SUBSTANTIATED. Deficiencies are being cited. See LIC 9099-D. Exit interview conducted with ADM. The report was provided to HM for signature. A copy of this report was provided to HM. Page 2 of 2 The facility does not serve food in good quality: On 12/27/2021, LPA interviewed Administrator (ADM). ADM stated the facility provided the meals to residents based on the food menu. ADM stated he/she did the grocery shopping for the facility and he/she tried to shop for different food supplies to make the food meals with changes and varieties. ADM stated it was hard to make each resident fully satisfied. ADM denied the facility provided raw food, expired food or spoiled food to residents. On the same day, LPA interviewed 3 staff. 3 out of 3 staff stated they all took turns to cook breakfast, lunch and dinner based on the menu. 3 out of 3 staff denied they provided raw food or expired food to residents. They all agreed that they provided sandwich for lunch. LPA interviewed 6 residents (R1 - R6), 4 out of 6 residents (R1 - R4) stated the facility food is good. 1 out of 6 residents(R6) was unable to answer the question. 1 out of 6 residents (R5) stated the facility provided the chicken with blood inside and pink inside, he/she stated he/she can cook better than staff but was not allowed to cook. 2 out of 6 residents (R3. R4) stated the sandwich for lunch is fine but they prefer to have hot food for lunch. LPA toured the facility with S1 to check the milk, perishable food and nonperishable food. LPA did not find expired milk or expired food. 2 day perishable food and 7 day nonperishable food were observed sufficient. Based on reviewing the food menu, all the weekday lunches were sandwich and many meals were supplied with "low fat", "low calorie" food. The Department has investigated the above allegation. Based on interview, record review, and observation the department has found the above allegation is unsubstantiated. An unsubstantiated finding indicates that although the allegation may have happened and/or is valid there is not a preponderance of evidence to show the alleged violations did or did not occur. No deficiencies were cited per California Code of Regulations, Title 22. This report was reviewed with HM and a copy of the report was provided. Page 2 of 2.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 18, 2023 · control 26-AS-20211221115941

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87303(a) · Plan of correction due date: Oct 19, 2023

87303 Maintenance and Operation (a) The facility shall be clean, safe, sanitary and in good repair at all times. Maintenance shall include provision of maintenance services and procedures for the safety and well-being of residents, employees and visitors. This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on the observvation, mold was observed on the ceiling of one of the restroom which posed a immediate health and safety risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 18, 2023

Plan of correction: Administrator stated he/she will submit a plan of correction by the POC due date to prevent the similar incident to occur again. LPA checked the bathroom today and there is no mold observed in the bathroom.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedthere was not enough evidence to prove a violation occurred — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe evidence showed the allegation was false, could not have happened, or had no reasonable basisType A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗

An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents and the questions below stand in their place.

Life here

Rooms, meals, the rhythm of a day, faith and language, pets and house rules — as the home describes them. Tap any detail for its source and date; nothing here is graded.

The home has not described daily life anywhere we have reviewed yet — that is the case for most small homes, and it says nothing about the home. These questions fill in the picture; keep the ones that matter to you.

Before you call

Ask every home the same questions — the state’s record does not answer these. Keep the ones that matter and they travel with your saved homes.

  1. What is included in the monthly rate, and what costs extra?
  2. Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?
  3. Which rooms does the non-ambulatory approval cover, and what transfer support is provided?
  4. What could change whether someone can stay here?
  5. Can we see a bedroom and share a meal during a visit?

Other homes nearby

The nearest licensed homes in Santa Clara County, closest first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.

Explore Santa Clara County