Illustration — no photo of this home on file yet

Oakdale Gardens Assisted Living

Small home·Licensed for 6·Winnetka, California

LicensedLicence #197610836
  • Care approvals on fileWheelchair · Dementia · Hospice · BedriddenState licensing record · September 13, 2026
  • Estimated starting rate$5,900 a monthCovelight estimate · likely $4,850–$7,250
  • Home sizeLicensed for 6Small care home · a licensed care home (RCFE)
  • Room at the last state visit6 of 6 beds occupiedJuly 15, 2026 · not a current opening
  • Ways to payAsk the homeMedi-Cal ALW participation not on file
  • Last state visitAugust 18, 2026CDSS inspection record

Oakdale Gardens Assisted Living is a small care home in Winnetka — a licensed residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE), the licence category behind “assisted living” and “board and care.” It is licensed for 6 residents.

Built from CDSS public records · September 13, 2026. Every fact below names its source and date.

Quick answers and the state record

A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

Quick answers about Oakdale Gardens Assisted Living

Is Oakdale Gardens Assisted Living licensed?

The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

How many residents is Oakdale Gardens Assisted Living licensed for?

6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

Has Oakdale Gardens Assisted Living been cited?

0 Type A and 0 Type B citations, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

Is Oakdale Gardens Assisted Living still open?

This license was on the CDSS roster as of September 28, 2026.

What does Oakdale Gardens Assisted Living cost?

$5,900 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $4,850–$7,250. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 12 small homes within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

Among 228 other homes of a similar licensed size across Los Angeles County that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $4,000 to $6,300 a month, and the middle figure is $5,000 (n = 228 other homes publishing a starting rate).

Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.

A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.

The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.

A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.

Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.

Does Oakdale Gardens Assisted Living take Medi-Cal?

On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.

Who holds the license?

The license is held by H & M Enterprise Inc., per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. See the homes licensed to H & M Enterprise Inc. — at least 2 on the state roster.

Is there a hospital nearby?

Northridge Hospital Medical Center is 2.2 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.

Can Oakdale Gardens Assisted Living keep a resident on hospice?

Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 6 residents, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

Oakdale Gardens Assisted Living license and inspection record

  • Name on the license: “OAKDALE GARDENS ASSISTED LIVING”, per the CDSS roster as of June 12, 2026.
  • License #197610836. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • Licensed for 6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • Licensed to H & M Enterprise Inc., per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • First licensed: the year is not on file — the roster carries no first-license date for it. Ask: “When did this license start?”
  • 6 state inspection visits on file, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • 0 Type A and 0 Type B citations on file, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • 2 complaints and 0 substantiated allegations on file, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
  • The most recent state visit on file is August 18, 2026, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
Type A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗

See the state’s own record

Can they support the care needed?

California licenses a home for specific kinds of care. The state’s record lists what this home is approved for; the home’s own answers fill in what changes as needs change.

  • Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved · covers up to 6 residents
  • Dementia / memory careApproved by the state
  • Hospice careApproved · covers up to 6 residents
  • BedriddenApproved · covers up to 1 resident

State licensing record · September 13, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.

Read the state’s own wording
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. APPROVED FOR SIX(6) NON-AMBULATORY RESIDENTS OF WHICH ONE(1) MAY BE BEDRIDDEN IN BEDROOM #3. WAIVER/GRANTED FOR HOSPICE CARE FOR SIX(6).

983 - RCFE / DEMENTIA

CDSS record, verbatim · September 13, 2026

As needs change

  • Staying through hospice

    Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 6 — care may continue at the end of life

    Ask: “If hospice is needed, can care continue here until the end?”

    State licensing record · September 13, 2026

  • If memory loss develops

    Dementia-care designation on file

    Ask: “Can we read the dementia care disclosure and discuss how daily support works?”

    State licensing record · September 13, 2026

3 more questions to ask the home
  • Two-person transfers or a lift

    Not on file

    Ask: “If two people or a lift are needed to transfer, can the person stay?”

  • Someone awake overnight

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?”

  • Medicines

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who manages the medicines, and what happens when a dose is missed?”

What it costs here

Covelight estimate

$5,900a month to start

Likely $4,850–$7,250

From 12 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file

Likely monthly total

$5,900a month

Likely $4,850–$7,400

With a shared room and basic help.

An estimate for planning, not a quote. The price is made in the phone call.

See the full cost breakdownRoom, care and fees · how people pay · how this estimate works
Room
Daily care
Sharing the room
  • Starting monthly rate$5,900likely $4,850–$7,250

    Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 12 small homes within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

  • Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600

    Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (45 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).

  • One-time move-in fee$2,000one time · likely $0–$4,000

    Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,000 (134 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.

Likely monthly totalLikely $4,850–$7,400
$5,900
First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $5,600–$10,400
$7,900
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
  • Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
  • Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
  • SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
  • VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
  • Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
  • MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
If the money runs out, what Medi-Cal covers
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
  • The care level

    Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.

  • What is billed separately

    Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.

  • Move-in costs

    A one-time community fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.

  • Increases

    California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.

  • What is the full monthly cost for the room and care we need, and what does it include?
  • What would the next care level cost, and who decides when it changes?
  • What is billed separately, and is there a one-time fee or deposit at move-in?
  • Is any private-pay period required before another payment program can begin?
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 12 small homes within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

12 homes like this within 5 miles publish starting rates mostly between $3,500–$5,500.

  • Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
  • Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
  • Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
  • Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
  • We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
  • It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Show the 12 nearby homes behind this estimate

Where it is

  • 7445 Oakdale Ave, Winnetka, CA 91306Address from the public record · September 13, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.

Opening the neighborhood map…

The state record

California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. Here are the dated documents and the state’s own words, beside what is typical for homes this size.

Since 2025, the state has filed 6 documents for this home, and its records count 6 visits. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated August 18, 2026.

On file since
2025
State visits
6
Most recent visit
August 18, 2026
Occupied · July 15, 2026 visit
6 of 6 bedsa count on that day, not an opening

We hold 2 complaint reports the state published for this home, dated April 29, 2026 to July 15, 2026. 2 of the 2 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Unsubstantiated” (2). 2 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word. Summary composed by computer from the 2 complaint reports below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

Beside homes the same size

  • Type A citations0typical 0
  • Type B citations0typical 0
  • Substantiated allegations0typical 0
  • Total complaints2typical 0

“Typical” is the statewide median across the 6,808 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations.

Year by year
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated20264502025110

The last 36 months — 6 of 6 documents

20264 state visits · 5 documents
Aug 18, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Deficiencies

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Evelin Rios conducted unannounced visit to this facility in conjunction with a complaint control #31-AS-20260812125848. LPA met with Staff #1 (S1), who granted access to facility. LPA's review of Guardian indicated, S1 is not Background finger printed cleared, immediate civil penalty will be issued in LIC 421BG. According to the administrator S1 started working yesterday. During record review, LPA observed that R1 has their P&I money in their file locked in a closet inaccessible to R1 with out assistance from administrator designee who has the key. According to the administrator designee R1 requested their money is held for safe keeping. Administrator designee also stated that they have only held R1's money for July and August. LPA requested a copy of the facility's Surety Bond and administrator designee stated they did not have one. Citations issued in 809D. Exit interview conducted. Appeal rights given and a copy of this report provided to the administrator designee.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 18, 2026

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87355(e)(2) · Plan of correction due date: Aug 19, 2026

(e)All individuals subject to a criminal record review ... shall prior to working, residing or volunteering in a licensed facility: (2) Obtain a California clearance or a criminal record exemption as required by the Department... This requirement is not met as evidence by: Based on interview and review of Guardian Background System Check, Facility Staff criminal background is not cleared and not associated to the facility. This poses an immediate risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 18, 2026

Plan of correction: Administrator has agreed to complete and background clearance and Guardian Association to facility and submit proof to the department by POC due date. S1 is not to return to the facility until they are associated to the facility.

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR87216(a) · Plan of correction due date: Aug 21, 2026

(a) Each licensee, other than a county, who is entrusted to safeguard resident cash resources, shall file or have on file with the licensing agency a copy of a bond issued by a surety company to the State of California as principal. This requirement is not met as evidence by: Based on interviews and record review the facility does not have a Surety Bond but is safeguarding R1's cash which poses a potential risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 18, 2026

Plan of correction: Administrator designee has agreed to return R1's cash and provide a safe place for R1 to maintain their cash in their bedroom. A statement of understanding regarding the regulation cited will be sent to the Department by POC due date.

Jul 15, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility is operating over capacity. Staff are not ensuring residents are provided with a proper place to sleep. Staff are not providing adequate food service to residents in care.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Abeye Duguma conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint visit to investigate the above allegations. LPA met with Elen Gabrielian and explained the reason for the visit. LPA spoke with the administrator, Marine Zhigoyan, who designated Gabrielian to sign and accept the report. --- Facility is operating over capacity. It was alleged that Resident #1 (R1) and their roommate, Resident #2 (R2), are sleeping in a car for part of the night and that facility staff bring them back inside during the early morning hours. To investigate the allegation, LPA conducted a physical plant tour and requested documents at around 10:00a.m., interviewed two (2) staff from 10:30a.m. – 11:30a.m., and interviewed four (4) out of six (6) residents from 11:30a.m. -12:30p.m. (CONT. LIC9099-C) Unsubstantiated During the physical plant tour, LPA observed five residents in the facility and seven beds. A review of the Department’s incident reports did not reveal any issues regarding capacity during the time in question. A review of R1’s Physician’s Report states hearing loss, vision loss (glasses – assistive device) and not able to leave the facility unassisted. During interviews, all staff stated they have never asked or forced anyone to sleep outside. Staff added R2 has a single occupancy room, R1 shares a room with Resident #3 (R3) and the seventh bed near the kitchen is for staff resting area only. During interviews with residents, R1 stated they and their roommate, R3, slept in a car for part of the night and that facility staff brought them back inside during the early morning hours but that ended about two (2) days ago. One (1) out of six (6) residents stated they are unaware of how many residents live here. Two (2) out of six (6) stated there are six residents living here in total. LPA was unable to interview the remaining two (2) residents. Based on interviews, record review and observations, there is not enough information to verify the above allegation. Therefore, the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED at this time. --- Staff are not ensuring residents are provided with a proper place to sleep. It was alleged that facility has eight (8) beds and fifteen (15) residents in the home. To investigate the allegation LPA conducted a physical plant tour and requested documents at around 10:00a.m., interviewed two (02) staff from 10:30a.m. – 11:30a.m., and interviewed four (4) out of six (6) residents from 11:30a.m. -12:30p.m. During the physical plant tour, LPA observed five residents in the facility and seven beds. A review of the Department’s incident reports did not reveal any issues regarding bed security during the time in question. During interviews, all staff stated there are six (6) residents in the facility, and all have a bed. Staff added no resident has ever gone without a bed in the facility. During interviews with residents, R1 stated there are fifteen (15) residents in the facility and only eight beds. All other residents stated they have never been without a bed. Based on interviews, record review and observations, there is not enough information to verify the above allegation. Therefore, the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED at this time. (CONT on LIC9099-C) --- Staff are not providing adequate food service to residents in care. It was alleged that R1 is receiving only two meals per day, and sometimes fewer. To investigate the allegation LPA conducted a physical plant tour at around 10:00a.m., interviewed two (02) staff from 10:30a.m. – 11:30a.m., and interviewed four (04) out of six (06) residents from 11:30a.m. -12:30p.m. During the physical plant tour, LPA observed snacks being offered and served and well-balance meals being prepared and served. During interviews, all staff stated they serve residents breakfast, lunch and dinner and offer snacks. During interviews with residents, R1 stated facility serves breakfast, lunch and dinner. R1 added that if they get hungry again they are offered snacks such as peanut butter sandwiches. All other residents stated they are served breakfast, lunch and dinner with snacks if they request. Based on interviews and observations, there is not enough information to verify the above allegation. Therefore, the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED at this time. No health and safety hazards noted during the visit. Exit interview conducted and a copy of the report was issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 15, 2026 · control 31-AS-20260421153725
Jul 8, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: POC

On 7.8.2026 at 12:30 PM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Leslie Ngo-Castaneda, arrived at the facility to conduct an unannounced, Plan Of Correction (POC) and was greeted by staff. The purpose of the POC visit is to make sure deficiencies were corrected on reports issued on 4.29.2026. At 11:45 AM LPA toured the facility and requested the following: - LPA cleared the POC that required LIC 9020. - Administrator remove S2 from the facility. - R6 files were completed. During LPA visit, it was observe that the bed was remove for staff in the kitchen, but was replace with a sofa bed. S2 was remove, but replace with another staff that is not background clear. Two (2) citations will be issued on 809-D. Per the California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8 cited and noted on LIC 809-D. An exit interview was conducted, citation(s) were issued, appeals rights and a copy of this report was given to the administrator.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 8, 2026

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87355(e)(3) · Plan of correction due date: Jul 9, 2026

The licensee shall submit these fingerprints to the California Department of Justice, along with a second set of fingerprints for the purpose of searching the records ... employment, residence, or initial presence in the facility. This requirement is not met as evidence by: Based on interview and review of Guardian Background System Check, Facility Staff criminal background is not cleared and not associated to the facility. This poses an immediate risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 8, 2026

Plan of correction: Administrator has agreed to complete Guardian Association and background clearance to facility and submit proof to the department by POC due date.

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR87307(a)(2)(b) · Plan of correction due date: Jul 22, 2026

a) Living accommodations and grounds shall be related to the facility's function... The following provisions shall apply: (2) …: (B) No room commonly used for other purposes shall be used as a sleeping room for any resident. This includes any hall, stairway, unfinished attic, garage storage area, shed or similar detached building. Based on observations a bed was observed in the kitchen in which staff stated to sleep, licensee did not ensure to provide an adequate space for staff which poses a potential risk to the residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 8, 2026

Plan of correction: Administrator will provide proper area for staff and will submit pictures to the department by POC due date.

Apr 29, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff do not ensure residents sleeping accommodations are being met. Staff do not ensure medications are dispensed as prescribed to resident. Staff did not provide adequate meals.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Leslie Ngo-Castaneda conducted an unannounced initial complaint visit to the facility to investigate the above allegation. LPA met with the staff designee (S1), Ani Ghazaryan, and explained the reason for the visit. To investigate the allegation on 04.29.2026, LPA took a tour of the physical plant at 8:35 AM. LPA requested copies of resident #1 (R1) physician report, admission agreement, appraisal needs and service plan, and other documents pertaining to the investigation. LPA reviewed documents at 11:00 AM, interviewed two (2) staff and five (5) residents who are at the facility from 8:47 AM to 10:59 AM. Allegation: Staff do not ensure residents sleeping accommodations are being met. It was alleged that staff told resident #1 (R1) and resident #5 (R5) to sleep in the car part of the night. During physical plant tour at 8:35 AM, LPA observed that R1 and R5 are residing comfortably in a shared bedroom. Continue to LIC 9099-C Unsubstantiated Interview with residents stated that allegation is false and they are comfortable and happy residing at the facility in their assigned bedroom. Interview with staff revealed that R1 and R2 reside in a shared bedroom and stated that allegation is false. LPA called and spoke to witness #1 (W1) at 10:13 AM, revealed that they are happy with the care and supervision of the facility and allegation is false. Based on observation and interviews, there is insufficient evidence to support the allegation. Therefore, the allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. Allegation: Staff do not ensure medications are dispensed as prescribed to resident. It was alleged that staff did not ensure R1 medications are dispensed as prescribed. LPA interview with residents present at the facility stated that they have no issues with medication. Interviews with staff revealed that they follow the prescription and dispense medication as indicated by the prescribing physician. LPA reviewed five (5) residents Centrally Stored Medication and Destruction Records (CSMDR) and medications. Based on LPA observation, medication was accounted for all the residents on CSMDR and medication in the facility. Based on observation and interviews, there is insufficient evidence to support the allegation. Therefore, the allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. Allegation: Staff did not provide adequate meals. It was alleged that staff failed to provide R1 with adequate and appropriate meals. Interview with residents revealed that they have no complaints or concerns regarding the meals and believed the food provided was nutritious to their dietary needs. At 9:30 AM LPA observed a healthy and nutritious breakfast being served to the residents. LPA conducted a tour of the kitchen and food storage areas. LPA observed that the facility had a fully stocked supply of food, including sufficient quantity of perishable and non-perishable items. LPA also observed the breakfast served during the visit was observed to have an adequate portion size and appeared nutritious (fruits, oatmeal and toast). Interview with staff indicated that the facility consistently maintains sufficient food supplies and that meals are prepared daily. Interview with residents revealed that facility staff caters to their special diet and meals are served appropriately. Based on observation and interviews, there is insufficient evidence to support the allegation. Therefore, the allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. Exit interview conducted and copy of this report signed and delivered.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 29, 2026 · control 31-AS-20260421114247
Apr 29, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Deficiencies

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Leslie Ngo-Castaneda conducted unannounced initial visit to this facility in conjunction with a complaint control #31-AS-20260421114247. LPA met with Staff #2 (S2) Mina Mavromati, who granted access to facility. S2 is not associated with facility, immediate civil penalty will be issued in LIC 421BG. During physical plant tour it was observed that S2 has a bed in the kitchen and S2 stated at 8:32AM that it’s their bed. During record review, the following were observed: · R6 not having a file at the facility, they have been residing at the facility for more than a week. · S1 failed to provide LIC 500 and LIC 9020. Citations issued in 809D. Exit interview conducted, Appeal rights given and a copy of this report delivered.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 29, 2026

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87355(e)(3) · Plan of correction due date: Apr 30, 2026

The licensee shall submit these fingerprints to the California Department of Justice, along with a second set of fingerprints for the purpose of searching the records ... employment, residence, or initial presence in the facility. This requirement is not met as evidence by: Based on interview and review of Guardian Background System Check, Facility Staff (S2)’s criminal background is not cleared and not associated to the facility. This poses an immediate risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 29, 2026

Plan of correction: Administrator has agreed to complete Guardian Association of S2 and background clearance to facility and submit proof to the department by POC due date.

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR87506(A) · Plan of correction due date: May 13, 2026

Prior to, or within two weeks of the resident’s admission, the licensee shall arrange a meeting with the resident,... of the resident’s home health agency, if any, and any other. appropriate parties, to prepare a written record of the care the resident will receive in the facility, and the resident’s preferences regarding the services provided at the facility. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on document review R6 does not have a file at the facility, which poses an potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 29, 2026

Plan of correction: Administrator will create a file for R6 and submit copies to the department by POC due date.

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87508(c) · Plan of correction due date: May 13, 2026

The register of current residents shall be kept in a central location at the facility. Based on document review a register of current residents was not available, which poses a potential risk to the persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 29, 2026

Plan of correction: Facility administrator will provide LPA an updated LIC 9020 by POC due date.

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR87307(a)(2)(b) · Plan of correction due date: Apr 29, 2026

a) Living accommodations and grounds shall be related to the facility's function... The following provisions shall apply: (2) …: (B) No room commonly used for other purposes shall be used as a sleeping room for any resident. This includes any hall, stairway, unfinished attic, garage storage area, shed or similar detached building. Based on observations a bed was observed in the kitchen in which staff stated to sleep, licensee did not ensure to provide an adequate space for staff which poses a potential risk to the residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 29, 2026

Plan of correction: Administrator will provide proper area for staff and will submit pictures to the department by POC due date.

20251 state visit · 1 document
Sep 12, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Prelicensing

On 9/12/2025 at 1:30PM Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Perchui Milena Khurshudyan conducted an announced Pre-Licensing visit to the above facility and met with facility Licensee/Administrator Zhigoyan Marina. LPA introduced herself by showing the department badge. Fire Clearance was approved on 6/10/2025 for a maximum capacity of six (6) Non-ambulatory residents, of which one (1) Bedridden resident for bedroom #3. Facility has a Dementia Care Program. The facility also has Hospice waiver for six (6) residents. The purpose of today’s visit is to inspect the facility to ensure that the facility is in compliance with rules and regulations under California Code of Regulations, Title 22. The facility is a single-story building. Today's site visit consisted of LPA touring the physical plant inside and outside and observed the following: KITCHEN: The facility has an open floor kitchen area that is equipped with a new refrigerator, microwave oven and sink. At 2:00pm, LPA observed adequate supplies of nonperishable food properly stored in the cabinets and inside the supply room. Perishable food items are not required at this time as there are no residents in the facility. LPA observed dining ware to accommodate a maximum capacity of six (6). All knives and sharps are observed to be locked inside a kitchen cabinet and inaccessible to residents in care. The facility has one (1) new fire extinguisher, appeared to be full and serviced and were last purchased on 6/13/2025. BEDROOMS: There are four (4) bedrooms in the facility and all bedrooms are designated for residents’ use. All bedrooms observed to be furnished with beds, dressers, chairs, night stands and required bedding and linen. The bedrooms have sufficient closet space and have sufficient lighting. Auditory alarms were tested and observed to be operational at 2:15pm. Facility will have awake staff at night. Emergency call buttons will be provided to residents. Continue on LIC809C LAUNDRY ROOM: The laundry room is located in a separate area /closet next to the dining area. The washer/dryer appears to be new and in good condition. Laundry supplies along with other chemical items will be kept locked inside the cabinets and under supervision when not in use. BATHROOMS: The facility has four (4) bathrooms. At 1:45PM LPA observed all bathrooms are clean, in good repair and properly supplied with toilet paper, soap and paper towels. LPA observed appropriate grab bars and non-skid mats in all bathrooms. Trash cans had closed tight fitting lids throughout the facility. Water temperature was within regulation, and it was measured by an LPA at 10:55AM to be at 116°F degrees. All bathrooms are designated for Staff and residents’ use. COMMON AREAS: The facility maintains a comfortable temperature at 76°F. The living room and dining area appeared clean and were properly furnished. The facility has activity puzzles, coloring books, crayons, board games and other activity supplies available for residents. No obstructions or tripping hazards throughout the facility. An emergency exit plan/sketch is posted along the hallway with other posting requirements. No fire-arms observed or will be maintained on the premises. MEDICATION ROOM: The medication will be centrally stored inside the locket cabinet located in the common area next to the kitchen. Facility staff/resident files will be kept centrally stored and locked inside the commercial cabinet located in the office room. First-aid kit was checked to be complete and has the new manual available. The facility will have two (2) staff members for each shift (AM and PM). SMOKE DETECTORS/CARBON MONOXIDE. Dual smoke detectors and carbon monoxide throughout the facility. At 2:30 PM they were tested and observed to be operational. SURROUNDING GROUNDS: The facility has sufficient yard space. LPA observed appropriate outdoor furniture, with a covered shaded area for residents. The backyard is fenced. There is no garage on the property. LPA observed the resin storage shed placed in the backyard. LPA discussed the importance of maintaining care and supervision to meet the needs of the residents. The facility has land line, checked by an LPA to be operational. Component III was conducted with the Administrator.Based on inspection and observation, the physical plant is in compliance with Title 22 Regulations at this time. This report will be forwarded to the Centralized Application Bureau (CAB) and the applicant will be notified by the CAB Analyst when the license has been approved. Exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report was provided to the Applicant/Administrator.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 12, 2025
What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedthere was not enough evidence to prove a violation occurred — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe evidence showed the allegation was false, could not have happened, or had no reasonable basisType A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗

An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents and the questions below stand in their place.

Life here

Rooms, meals, the rhythm of a day, faith and language, pets and house rules — as the home describes them. Tap any detail for its source and date; nothing here is graded.

The home has not described daily life anywhere we have reviewed yet — that is the case for most small homes, and it says nothing about the home. These questions fill in the picture; keep the ones that matter to you.

Before you call

Ask every home the same questions — the state’s record does not answer these. Keep the ones that matter and they travel with your saved homes.

  1. What is included in the monthly rate, and what costs extra?
  2. Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?
  3. Which rooms does the non-ambulatory approval cover, and what transfer support is provided?
  4. What could change whether someone can stay here?
  5. Can we see a bedroom and share a meal during a visit?

Other homes nearby

The nearest licensed homes in Los Angeles County, closest first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.

Explore Los Angeles County