Illustration — no photo of this home on file yet

Lovebird Senior Living

Small home·Licensed for 6·Granada Hills, California

Licensed since 2023Licence #197610475
  • Care approvals on fileWheelchair · Dementia · Hospice · BedriddenState licensing record · September 13, 2026
  • Estimated starting rate$4,900 a monthCovelight estimate · likely $4,000–$6,050
  • Home sizeLicensed for 6Small care home · a licensed care home (RCFE)
  • Room at the last state visit6 of 6 beds occupiedOctober 4, 2025 · not a current opening
  • Ways to payAsk the homeMedi-Cal ALW participation not on file
  • Last state visitDecember 12, 2025CDSS inspection record
  • Licence holderLovebird Senior Living Inc.Since 2023 · 2 licensed homes

Lovebird Senior Living is a small care home in Granada Hills — a licensed residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE), the licence category behind “assisted living” and “board and care.” It is licensed for 6 residents since 2023.

Built from CDSS public records · September 13, 2026. Every fact below names its source and date.

Quick answers and the state record

A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

Quick answers about Lovebird Senior Living

Is Lovebird Senior Living licensed?

The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

How many residents is Lovebird Senior Living licensed for?

6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

Has Lovebird Senior Living been cited?

2 Type A and 0 Type B citations since 2023, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. Those records count 5 state visits over the same years.

Is Lovebird Senior Living still open?

This license was on the CDSS roster as of September 28, 2026.

What does Lovebird Senior Living cost?

$4,900 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $4,000–$6,050. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 24 small homes within 10 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

Among 228 other homes of a similar licensed size across Los Angeles County that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $4,000 to $6,300 a month, and the middle figure is $5,000 (n = 228 other homes publishing a starting rate).

Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.

A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.

The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.

A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.

Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.

Does Lovebird Senior Living take Medi-Cal?

On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.

Who holds the license?

The license is held by Lovebird Senior Living Inc., per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. See the homes licensed to Lovebird Senior Living Inc. — at least 2 on the state roster.

Is there a hospital nearby?

LAC/Olive View-UCLA Medical Center is 3.2 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.

Can Lovebird Senior Living keep a resident on hospice?

Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 6 residents, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

Lovebird Senior Living license and inspection record

  • Name on the license: “LOVEBIRD SENIOR LIVING INC”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
  • License #197610475. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • Licensed for 6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • Licensed to Lovebird Senior Living Inc., per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • First licensed in 2023, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • 5 state inspection visits since 2023, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • 2 Type A and 0 Type B citations on file since 2023, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. The same records count 5 state visits in that period.
  • 2 complaints and 1 substantiated allegation on file since 2023, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
  • The most recent state visit on file is December 12, 2025, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
Type A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗

See the state’s own record

Can they support the care needed?

California licenses a home for specific kinds of care. The state’s record lists what this home is approved for; the home’s own answers fill in what changes as needs change.

  • Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved · covers up to 6 residents
  • Dementia / memory careApproved by the state
  • Hospice careApproved · covers up to 6 residents
  • BedriddenApproved · covers up to 1 resident

State licensing record · September 13, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.

Read the state’s own wording
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 6 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 1 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. WAIVER/GRANTED FOR HOSPICE CARE FOR (6). BEDROOM #4 CLEARED FOR BEDRIDDEN.

983 - RCFE / DEMENTIA

CDSS record, verbatim · September 13, 2026

As needs change

  • Staying through hospice

    Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 6 — care may continue at the end of life

    Ask: “If hospice is needed, can care continue here until the end?”

    State licensing record · September 13, 2026

  • If memory loss develops

    Dementia-care designation on file

    Ask: “Can we read the dementia care disclosure and discuss how daily support works?”

    State licensing record · September 13, 2026

3 more questions to ask the home
  • Two-person transfers or a lift

    Not on file

    Ask: “If two people or a lift are needed to transfer, can the person stay?”

  • Someone awake overnight

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?”

  • Medicines

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who manages the medicines, and what happens when a dose is missed?”

What it costs here

Covelight estimate

$4,900a month to start

Likely $4,000–$6,050

From 24 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file

Likely monthly total

$4,900a month

Likely $4,000–$6,200

With a shared room and basic help.

An estimate for planning, not a quote. The price is made in the phone call.

See the full cost breakdownRoom, care and fees · how people pay · how this estimate works
Room
Daily care
Sharing the room
  • Starting monthly rate$4,900likely $4,000–$6,050

    Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 24 small homes within 10 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

  • Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600

    Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (45 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).

  • One-time move-in fee$2,000one time · likely $0–$4,000

    Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,000 (134 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.

Likely monthly totalLikely $4,000–$6,200
$4,900
First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $4,700–$9,300
$6,900
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
  • Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
  • Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
  • SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
  • VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
  • Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
  • MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
If the money runs out, what Medi-Cal covers
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
  • The care level

    Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.

  • What is billed separately

    Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.

  • Move-in costs

    A one-time community fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.

  • Increases

    California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.

  • What is the full monthly cost for the room and care we need, and what does it include?
  • What would the next care level cost, and who decides when it changes?
  • What is billed separately, and is there a one-time fee or deposit at move-in?
  • Is any private-pay period required before another payment program can begin?
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 24 small homes within 10 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

24 homes like this within 10 miles publish starting rates mostly between $3,400–$5,850.

  • Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
  • Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
  • Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
  • Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
  • We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
  • It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Show the 24 nearby homes behind this estimate

Where it is

  • 13153 Constable Avenue, Granada Hills, CA 91344Address from the public record · September 13, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.

Opening the neighborhood map…

The state record

California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. Here are the dated documents and the state’s own words, beside what is typical for homes this size.

Since 2023, the state has filed 5 documents for this home, and its records count 5 visits since 2023. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated December 12, 2025.

On file since
2023
State visits
5
Most recent visit
December 12, 2025
Occupied · October 4, 2025 visit
6 of 6 bedsa count on that day, not an opening

We hold 2 complaint reports the state published for this home, dated May 21, 2025 to October 4, 2025. 2 of the 2 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (1), “Unsubstantiated” (1). 2 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word. Summary composed by computer from the 2 complaint reports below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

Beside homes the same size

  • Type A citations2typical 0
  • Type B citations0typical 0
  • Substantiated allegations1typical 0
  • Total complaints2typical 0

“Typical” is the statewide median across the 6,808 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this licence since 2023.

Year by year
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated20254412023110

The last 36 months — 5 of 5 documents

20254 state visits · 4 documents
Dec 12, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Michael Cava conducted an Annual Required visit and inspection of the facility. LPA met with staff, Karina Vargas, and explained the reason for the visit. At approximately 9:15am, LPA took a tour of the physical plant. The facility is a one story building. Required postings were observed in the entry area. The smoke alarms and carbon monoxide are dual and interconnected. The facility has one fire extinguisher, located in the kitchen. It was purchased on 03/04/25. KITCHEN: The kitchen area is equipped with a refrigerator, oven/stove, microwave oven and sink. There is an adequate supply of perishable and nonperishable food and dining ware to accommodate a maximum capacity of six (6). Knives are locked in a kitchen drawer. No cleaning supplies were observed out and accessible to the residents during the day of the inspection. BEDROOMS: There are four (4) bedrooms designated for client use. Bedroom #1 and #3 are private, while bedrooms #2 and #4 are shared. Per STD 850, only bedroom #4 has the fire clearance for bedridden. All bedrooms, utilized by the residents are furnished with beds, night stand, chairs, dresser, bedding and linen. All the bedrooms have sufficient lighting and closet space. Exit doors in resident rooms were checked to insure the auditory signal is functional. BATHROOMS: The facility has two (2) bathrooms. Bedroom #4 has it's own bathroom with a bathtub, but it is not being used for the residents. Both bathrooms were observed to have the proper fixtures, grab bars, and non-skid mats. The hot water delivered in the bathrooms measured between 107 and 109 degrees. No cleaning supplies were observed out and accessible to the residents during the day of the inspection. COMMON AREAS: These included the living room and dining room areas. The living room was observed with sufficient seating of couches and chairs. Living room is also furnished with a coffee and chess table. There is a fireplace with a screen in the living room, but it is non-operational. The key is stored and inaccessible to residents. No fireplace tools or fixtures present. The dining room table is large enough to accommodate between six (6) to eight (8). There were no visible immediate hazards. Floors were mopped and clean, and furniture were all in good repair. GARAGE: The garage is attached to the home. Door to the garage requires a key to gain access. Garage is used as extra storage space for cleaning supplies, food and emergency items. LAUNDRY ROOM: The laundry room is located in the garage. No cleaning supplies or laundry detergents were observed in the open during inspection. MEDICATIONS: The medication cabinet is located in the dining room. Cabinet has a locking mechanism to insure medications will be inaccessible to residents. OFFICE/STAFF WORKSTATION: Staff workstation is located next to the living room, by the back exit area. Resident and personnel files will be maintained in a locked filing cabinet there. SURROUNDING GROUNDS: The driveway, passageways and entrance to the home was clear of obstruction. All entry and exit doors have a functional auditory alert when the doors open. The backyard of the facility has a patio and backyard furniture to accommodate the six (6) residents. The facility backyard has sufficient yard space. There is no swimming pool or an other bodies of water. Pursuant to Title 22 Division 6 of the CA Code of Regulations, there were no deficiencies observed during the visit. Exit Interview Conducted and a Copy of the Report Issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 12, 2025
Oct 4, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not safeguard resident's personal belongings Staff did not serve residents food free from contamination Staff is charging resident for services not rendered Staff did not provide a comfortable environment for resident

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Michael Cava conducted a subsequent visit to the facility to conclude the investigation regarding the above allegations. The initial visit was made by LPA Cava on 03/04/25. LPA met with staff Karina Vargas, and advised her of the complaint. Today’s investigation consisted of interviews with the administrator, staff and residents. LPA also conducted a physical plant inspection and reviewed resident records. Investigation is as follows: Staff did not safeguard resident’s personal belongings: In regards to the allegation, it was reported that the licensee did not safeguard two pairs of Resident 1’s (R1) pants, and two shirts. R1 only stayed at this facility for a month. When R1 conducted an inventory of their belongings, at the new facility that R1 moved to, these items were missing. Unsubstantiated Interviews conducted with the administrator and two (2) of two staff held between 8:00am-9:00am deny the allegation. The administrator confirmed that R1 only stayed at the facility from 11/03/24 to 12/07/23. Both administrator and staff stated that when R1 moved out, all of R1’s personal belongings were taken with them and accounted for. Approximately 9:00am-10:00am, LPA conducted a record review of R1s records. LIC 621 (Client/Resident Personal Property and Valuables) was observed on file. There were no entries for pants and shirts on the inventory. Only item listed is R1’s cell phone. Approximately 10:00am-11:00am, interviews were conducted with six (6) of six residents. These residents expressed no complaints or concerns regarding safeguarding or any loss of their property. Based on the information obtained, it could not be proven that staff failed to safeguard R1’s personal belongings. There was no evidence that R1’s pants and shirts was in R1’s possession during R1’s stay at the facility as it was not entered on the LIC 621. Therefore, the allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. Staff did not serve residents food free from contamination In regards to the allegation, it was reported that facility staff served food that was not kept in the refrigerator, or properly sealed, exposing food to contamination. As a result of this, residents got sick. Dates and times were not indicated to this allegation. Nor were there any residents or witnesses identified to corroborate the food contamination caused illness to residents. Interviews conducted with the administrator and two (2) of two staff held between 8:00am-9:00am deny the allegation. Administrator and staff had no past or current incidents of any food sicknesses to report. Staff stated food is properly sealed and labeled once served. Nothing is left open to contamination. Approximately 10:00am-11:00am, interviews were conducted with six (6) of six residents. These residents had no complaints of getting sick due to contaminated food, or and concerns that food is not being sealed properly once served. Approximately 11:00am-12:00pm, LPA conducted a physical plant inspection. LPA observed the food service/kitchen area to be clean, safe and sanitary. Perishable food in the refrigerator was observed properly sealed, labeled and nothing open and exposed. Non-perishable food kept in the kitchen pantry was observed closed, sealed and to date. Based on the information obtained, it could not be proven that staff do not keep food free from contamination. Therefore, the allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. Staff is charging resident for services not rendered In regards to the allegation, it was reported that the licensee charged R1 $800 from 10/01/24 to 10/04/24, but R1 did not move into the facility until November 2024. No documentation or records submitted to prove the $800 transaction. Interview conducted with the administrator held between 8:00am-9:00am deny the allegation. The administrator confirmed that R1 moved in 11/03/24 and moved out on 12/07/24. Administrator stated there is a pre-admission fee, but stated this fee was waived and denies that an $800 fee was charged for the periods of 10/01/24 to 10/04/24. Approximately 9:00am to 10:00am, LPA conducted a record review and observed R1 had a monthly fee of $4000. R1 did not opt for any optional services, nor was any provided to R1 during their stay. LPA observed the Pre-Admission fee was crossed out, as indicated by the administrator that this fee was never charged. Based on the information obtained, it could not be proven that R1 was charged for services not rendered. Therefore, the allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. Staff did not provide a comfortable environment for resident In regards to the allegation, it was reported that a male staff entered R1’s room unannounced while R1 was undressed. No time or date given to when this incident had occurred. Moreover, there was no names provided to identify this male staff or any witnesses identified to corroborate with this allegation. Interviews conducted with the administrator and two (2) of two staff held between 8:00am-9:00am deny the allegation. Staff state they always knock and make an announcement before entering any of the resident rooms. Approximately 10:00am-11:00am, interviews were conducted with six (6) of six residents. These residents expressed no concerns or complaints of any personal rights violations or not being provided a comfortable environment. Approximately 11:00am-12:00pm, during the physical plant inspection, LPA did not observe any personal rights violation while observing facility operations. Based on the information obtained, it could not be proven that staff are not providing residents with a comfortable environment. Therefore, the allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 4, 2025 · control 31-AS-20250227144825
May 21, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Licensee retained a resident with a prohibited health condition.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Michael Cava conducted a subsequent complaint visit to the facility to conclude the investigation regarding the above allegation. LPA met with the administrator, Armine Sargsian, and advised her of the complaint. It was reported that Resident 1 (R1) sustained an unstageable decubitus ulcer, resulting in hospitalization. R1 remained at the facility, with this prohibited health condition until hospitalized on 12/21/24, where R1’s wounds were noted. On 01/08/25, the complaint was referred to Investigations Branch (IB) and accepted as a full investigation, assigned IB investigator Jose Santana. On 01/13/25, LPA Cava conducted the 10 day/initial complaint visit to this allegation to conduct the health and safety inspection and gather records. IB’s investigation consisted of interviews with facility administrator, facility staff, and witnesses. IB also obtained R1’s medical records for review. The following is the results from IB's investigation: Substantiated From 01/15/25 to 02/28/25, IB conducted continuous interviews with facility administrator, staff and witnesses. These interviews reveal that R1 was not being repositioned as instructed on R1’s care plan. Further interviews with witnesses reveal that although staff took care of R1, staff did not consistently reposition R1 as instructed on their care plan. Moreover, it was also revealed that facility staff were not in communication with the home health agency regarding the progress of R1’s wound. On 01/14/25 and 01/31/25, IB received R1’s medical records and the following were reviewed: · R1 was admitted to the facility on 11/29/24. · Home Health was in place to treat R1 for Massive Associated Skin Damage (MASD). · On 12/05/24, there was some skin discoloration, but was assessed on 12/06/24 to be Stage I. · On 12/09/24, there was home health orders to provide wound care. · On 12/14/24, medical records and picture documents stage 3 in sacral area. · On 12/16/24, despite treatment from home health to address R1’s wounds, R1’s wounds progressed. · On 12/16/24 to 12/17/24, R1’s wound to the coccyx and heel progressed and was diagnosed by home health to be stage 3 and 4. · 12/16/24 to 12/20/24, with documentation and the licensee’s knowledge of the wound’s progression to the coccyx and heel, R1 was still retained at the facility for another five days. · On 12/21/24, R1 was eventually transferred to the hospital for an unrelated medical emergency. Based on the information obtained, there is sufficient evidence that the licensee retained R1 at the facility with a prohibited health condition. Therefore, the allegation is Substantiated. Citations issued on the 9099D. Licensee advised of possible Civil Penalty and Enhanced Civil Penalties (ECPs) may be assessed.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 21, 2025 · control 31-AS-20250107135728

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87615(a)(1) · Plan of correction due date: May 21, 2025

Prohibited Health Conditions- (a)Persons who require health services for or have a health condition including, but not limited to, those specified below shall not be admitted or retained in a residential care facility for the elderly: (1)Stage 3 and 4 pressure injuries. This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Licensee continued to retain R1 after their wound progressed to stage 3 and 4 wound. This posed an immediate health and safety risk to the resident in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 21, 2025

Plan of correction: As POC, the licensee will hold training to address this section of the regulations. As proof training was held, licensee will submit a copy of the attendance log, training topic with regulations, and date that this training was held by June 4, 2025

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87465(a)(1) · Plan of correction due date: May 21, 2025

Incidental Medical and Dental Care- The licensee shall arrange, or assist in arranging, for medical and dental care appropriate to the conditions and needs of residents. This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Licensee failed to transfer R1 to a higher level of care once R1's wounds progressed to stage 3 and 4. This posed an immediate health and safety risk to the resident in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 21, 2025

Plan of correction: As POC, the licensee will hold training to address this section of the regulations. As proof training was held, licensee will submit a copy of the attendance log, training topic with regulations, and date that this training was held by June 4, 2025

Mar 4, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Michael Cava conducted an Annual Required visit and inspection of the facility. LPA met with the administrator, Armine Sargsian, and explained the reason for the visit. At approximately 12:45pm, LPA took a tour of the physical plant. The facility is a one story building, licensed to serve residents age 60 years and over. Required postings were observed in the entry area. The smoke alarms and carbon monoxide are dual, hardwired and interconnected. The facility has one new fire extinguisher, located in the kitchen. It was purchased on 03/03/25. KITCHEN: The facility has a Kitchen area that is equipped with a refrigerator, oven/stove, microwave oven and sink. There was an adequate supply of perishable and nonperishable food and dining ware to accommodate a maximum capacity of six (6). Knives are locked in a kitchen drawer. No cleaning supplies were observed out and accessible to the residents during the day of the inspection. BEDROOMS: There are four (4) bedrooms designated for client use. Bedroom #1 and #3 are private, while bedrooms #2 and #4 are shared. Per STD 850, only bedroom #4 has the fire clearance for bedridden. All bedrooms, that are utilized by the residents are furnished with beds, night stand, chairs, dresser, bedding and linen. All the bedrooms have sufficient lighting and closet space. Exit doors in resident rooms were checked to insure the auditory signal is functional. BATHROOMS: The facility has two (2) bathrooms. Bedroom #4 has it's own bathroom with a bathtub, but it is not being used for the residents. Both bathrooms were observed to have the proper fixtures, grab bars, and non-skid mats. The hot water delivered in the bathrooms measured at 111 degrees. No cleaning supplies were observed in the open, or accessible to the residents during the day of the inspection. COMMON AREAS: These included the living room which is equipped with a couch, three chairs, television, a coffee table and chess table. There is a fireplace with a screen but is non-operational. The key is stored and inaccessible to residents. No fireplace tools or fixtures present. The dining room table is large enough to accommodate between six (6) to eight (8). There were no visible immediate hazards. Floors were mopped and clean, and furniture were all in good repair. GARAGE/LAUNDRY ROOM: The garage is attached to the home. The laundry room is located in the garage. Door to the garage has an alert to notify staff that the entry door to the garage is open. No cleaning supplies observed, or will be kept in the garage. Garage is also used as extra storage space for PPE supplies and emergency water. MEDICATIONS: The medication cabinet is located in the dining room. Cabinet has a locking mechanism to insure medications will be inaccessible to residents. OFFICE/STAFF WORKSTATION: Staff workstation is located next to the living room, by the back exit area. Resident and personnel files will be maintained in a locked filing cabinet there. SURROUNDING GROUNDS: The driveway, passageways and entrance to the home was clear of obstruction. All entry and exit doors have a functional auditory alert when the doors open. The backyard of the facility has a patio and backyard furniture to accommodate the six (6) residents. The facility backyard has sufficient yard space. There is no swimming pool or an other bodies of water. Pursuant to Title 22 Division 6 of the CA Code of Regulations, there were no deficiencies observed during the visit. Exit Interview Conducted and a Copy of the Report Issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 4, 2025
20231 state visit · 1 document
Dec 13, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Prelicensing

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Michael Cava conducted a Pre-Licensing Inspection with the applicant representative and administrator, Anna Petrosyan and Armine Sargsian. An Application to operate a Residential Care Facility for the Elderly (RCFE) was received by Community Care Licensing (CCL) on August 9, 2023. A fire clearance was approved on September 19, 2023 for five (5) non-ambulatory residents and one (1) bedridden resident, for a total capacity of six. The applicant is also requesting a hospice waiver to retain six (6) residents. The smoke alarms and carbon monoxide detectors are dual and hard wired. The facility has one new fire extinguishers that was purchased on September 12, 2023. It is located in the kitchen A tour of the physical plant was initiated at approximately 1:00pm and the following was observed: KITCHEN: The facility has a Kitchen area that is equipped with a refrigerator, microwave oven and sink. There was an adequate supply of nonperishable food and dining ware to accommodate a maximum capacity of six (6). Knives were observed locked in a kitchen drawer. BEDROOMS: There are four (4) bedrooms designated for client use. Bedroom #1 and #3 are private, while bedrooms #2 and #4 are shared. Per STD 850, bedroom #4 only, has the fire clearance for bedridden. The applicant furnished all the resident bedrooms with beds, night stand, chairs, dresser, bedding and linen. The bedrooms also have sufficient lighting and closet space. BATHROOMS: The facility has two (2) bathrooms. Bedroom #4 has it's own bathroom with a bathtub, but it won't be utilized for residents. Both bathrooms were observed to have the proper fixtures, grab bars, and non-skid mats. The hot water delivered in the bathrooms measured at 105 degrees. COMMON AREAS: These included the living room which were equipped with a couch, chair, television, and table. There is a fireplace with a screen but will be non-operational. The key will be stored and inaccessible to residents. No fireplace tools or fixtures present. The dining area has a large dining room table to accommodate between six (6) to eight (8). There were no visible immediate hazards. GARAGE/LAUNDRY ROOM: The laundry room is located in the garage. Door to the garage has an alert to notify staff that the entry door to the garage is open. No cleaning supplies observed, or will be kept in the garage. The washer/dryer are brand new. Garage will also be used as extra storage space for equipment, PPE supplies, and emergency water. MEDICATIONS: The medication cabinet is located in the dining room. Cabinet has a locking mechanism to insure medications will be inaccessible to residents. OFFICE/STAFF WORKSTATION: Staff workstation is located by the exit to the backyard.. Resident and personnel files will be maintained in a locked filing cabinet there. SURROUNDING GROUNDS: The driveway, passageways and entrance to the home was clear of obstruction. All entry and exit doors have a functional auditory alert when the doors open. The backyard of the facility has a patio and backyard furniture to accommodate the six (6) residents. The facility backyard has sufficient yard space. There is no swimming pool or bodies of water. In addition to the Pre-Licensing inspection, a Component III power point presentation was also held between/approximately 12:20pm and 1:00pm Pursuant to Title 22, Division 6 of the CA Code of Regulations, the facility's physical environment appears to be compliant and ready for licensure. CAB will be advised and a copy of this report provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 13, 2023
What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedthere was not enough evidence to prove a violation occurred — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe evidence showed the allegation was false, could not have happened, or had no reasonable basisType A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗

An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents and the questions below stand in their place.

Who holds the licence

Lovebird Senior Living Inc., licensed since 2023, operates 2 licensed homes in California. Running more than one home is common and is neither good nor bad on its own.

Life here

Rooms, meals, the rhythm of a day, faith and language, pets and house rules — as the home describes them. Tap any detail for its source and date; nothing here is graded.

The home has not described daily life anywhere we have reviewed yet — that is the case for most small homes, and it says nothing about the home. These questions fill in the picture; keep the ones that matter to you.

Before you call

Ask every home the same questions — the state’s record does not answer these. Keep the ones that matter and they travel with your saved homes.

  1. What is included in the monthly rate, and what costs extra?
  2. Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?
  3. Which rooms does the non-ambulatory approval cover, and what transfer support is provided?
  4. What could change whether someone can stay here?
  5. Can we see a bedroom and share a meal during a visit?

Other homes nearby

The nearest licensed homes in Los Angeles County, closest first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.

Explore Los Angeles County