Illustration — no photo of this home on file yet

Lotus Garden Care Home

Small home·Licensed for 6·Santa Clara, California

Licensed since 2021Licence #435202828
  • Care approvals on fileWheelchair · Hospice · BedriddenState licensing record · September 27, 2026
  • Estimated starting rate$5,050 a monthCovelight estimate · likely $4,100–$6,200
  • Home sizeLicensed for 6Small care home · a licensed care home (RCFE)
  • Ways to payAsk the homeMedi-Cal ALW participation not on file
  • Last state visitOctober 2, 2025CDSS inspection record
  • Licence holderGhebresellasie, ZenebeshSince 2021 · 2 licensed homes

Lotus Garden Care Home is a small care home in Santa Clara — a licensed residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE), the licence category behind “assisted living” and “board and care.” It is licensed for 6 residents since 2021. Dementia care is not on file.

Built from CDSS public records · September 27, 2026. Every fact below names its source and date.

Quick answers and the state record

A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

Quick answers about Lotus Garden Care Home

Is Lotus Garden Care Home licensed?

The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

How many residents is Lotus Garden Care Home licensed for?

6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Has Lotus Garden Care Home been cited?

0 Type A and 0 Type B citations since 2021, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. Those records count 6 state visits over the same years.

Is Lotus Garden Care Home still open?

This license was on the CDSS roster as of September 28, 2026.

What does Lotus Garden Care Home cost?

$5,050 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $4,100–$6,200. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 24 small homes and similar homes within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

Among 80 other homes of a similar licensed size across Santa Clara County that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $3,850 to $5,000 a month, and the middle figure is $4,200 (n = 80 other homes publishing a starting rate).

Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.

A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.

The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.

A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.

Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.

Does Lotus Garden Care Home take Medi-Cal?

On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.

Who holds the license?

The license is held by Ghebresellasie, Zenebesh, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Is there a hospital nearby?

O'Connor Hospital is 2.5 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.

Can Lotus Garden Care Home keep a resident on hospice?

Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 3 residents, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Lotus Garden Care Home license and inspection record

  • Name on the license: “LOTUS GARDEN CARE HOME”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
  • License #435202828. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • Licensed for 6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • Licensed to Ghebresellasie, Zenebesh, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • First licensed in 2021, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • 6 state inspection visits since 2021, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • 0 Type A and 0 Type B citations on file since 2021, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. The same records count 6 state visits in that period.
  • 0 complaints and 0 substantiated allegations on file since 2021, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • The most recent state visit on file is October 2, 2025, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
Type A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗

See the state’s own record

Can they support the care needed?

California licenses a home for specific kinds of care. The state’s record lists what this home is approved for; the home’s own answers fill in what changes as needs change.

  • Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved · covers up to 6 residents
  • Dementia / memory careNot on file · ask the home
  • Hospice careApproved · covers up to 3 residents
  • BedriddenApproved · covers up to 1 resident

State licensing record · September 27, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.

Read the state’s own wording
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER; APPROVED FOR CAPACITY OF 6 NON-AMBULATORY OF WHICH (1) ONE MAY BE BEDRIDDEN; HOSPICE WAIVER APPROVED FOR THREE (3) HOSPICE RESIDENTS.

935 - ELDERLY

CDSS record, verbatim · September 27, 2026

As needs change

  • Staying through hospice

    Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 3 — care may continue at the end of life

    Ask: “If hospice is needed, can care continue here until the end?”

    State licensing record · September 27, 2026

4 more questions to ask the home
  • Two-person transfers or a lift

    Not on file

    Ask: “If two people or a lift are needed to transfer, can the person stay?”

  • Someone awake overnight

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?”

  • Medicines

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who manages the medicines, and what happens when a dose is missed?”

  • If memory loss develops

    Dementia-care designation not on file

    Ask: “If memory loss develops, what would change — and when would a move be needed?”

What it costs here

Covelight estimate

$5,050a month to start

Likely $4,100–$6,200

From 24 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file

Likely monthly total

$5,050a month

Likely $4,100–$6,350

With a shared room and basic help.

An estimate for planning, not a quote. The price is made in the phone call.

See the full cost breakdownRoom, care and fees · how people pay · how this estimate works
Room
Daily care
Sharing the room

Memory care is not priced here: a dementia-care designation is not on file for this home. Ask the home.

  • Starting monthly rate$5,050likely $4,100–$6,200

    Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 24 small homes and similar homes within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

  • Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600

    Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (45 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).

  • One-time move-in fee$2,000one time · likely $0–$4,000

    Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,000 (134 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.

Likely monthly totalLikely $4,100–$6,350
$5,050
First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $4,800–$9,450
$7,050
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
  • Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
  • Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
  • SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
  • VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
  • Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
  • MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
If the money runs out, what Medi-Cal covers
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
  • The care level

    Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.

  • What is billed separately

    Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.

  • Move-in costs

    A one-time community fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.

  • Increases

    California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.

  • What is the full monthly cost for the room and care we need, and what does it include?
  • What would the next care level cost, and who decides when it changes?
  • What is billed separately, and is there a one-time fee or deposit at move-in?
  • Is any private-pay period required before another payment program can begin?
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 24 small homes and similar homes within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

24 homes like this within 5 miles publish starting rates mostly between $3,000–$5,900.

  • Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
  • Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
  • Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
  • Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
  • We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
  • It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Show the 24 nearby homes behind this estimate

Where it is

  • 2119 Monroe Street, Santa Clara, CA 95050Address from the public record · September 27, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.

Opening the neighborhood map…

The state record

California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. Here are the dated documents and the state’s own words, beside what is typical for homes this size.

Since 2021, the state has filed 7 documents for this home, and its records count 6 visits since 2021. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated October 2, 2025.

On file since
2021
State visits
6
Most recent visit
October 2, 2025

Beside homes the same size

  • Type A citations0typical 0
  • Type B citations0typical 0
  • Substantiated allegations0typical 0
  • Total complaints0typical 0

“Typical” is the statewide median across the 6,808 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this licence since 2021.

Year by year
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated20251102024220202311020221102021220

The last 36 months — 4 of 7 documents

20251 state visit · 1 document
Oct 2, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Marcella Tarin and Manuel Monter conducted an unannounced annual inspection and met with Administrator (ADM) Lori Mohassel. LPAs stated the purpose of the visit. LPAs toured the interior and exterior of the facility with ADM to include the kitchen, resident rooms, dining room, bathrooms, back and front of the facility. All exit and passageways were free and clear of obstruction. LPAs toured the kitchen area and observed a perishable food supply of at least two days and a non-perishable food supply of at least seven days. LPAs observed refrigerator temperature at 40 F and Freezer at 0 F. LPAs observed the medication storage area, knives storage area, and cleaning product storage area as locked and inaccessible to residents in care. The facility was equipped with smoke and carbon monoxide detectors. All smoke detectors functioned properly when tested by ADM. Fire extinguishers were last serviced on 9/7/2025. LPAs reviewed the facility first aid kit, and it was observed to be complete. The facility emergency drill log was reviewed. The facility's last drill was on 7/25/2025. LPAs toured 6 resident bedrooms. All 6 resident rooms have a bed, functioning lights, dresser/table, bedding and space for personal belongings. LPAs toured 5 resident bathrooms. All 5 bathrooms had hand soap, paper towels, functioning lights, and covered trash bins. LPAs measured water temperature with a range of 118 F to 119 F. Page 1 of 2 LPAs reviewed 3 resident records. LPAs reviewed 3 resident’s Centrally Stored Medication and Destruction Records (CSMDR’s). LPAs reviewed 3 staff records. No deficiencies were cited during today's visit per California Code of Regulations Title 22. An exit interview was conducted with Administrator Lori Mohassel and a signed copy of this report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 2, 2025
20242 state visits · 2 documents
Dec 27, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Deficiencies

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Simi Rai conducted an unannounced case management visit to follow up on the Type A deficiencies cited on 9/27/2024. LPA Rai met with Administrator (ADM) Lori Mohassel and stated the purpose of today's visit. LPA Rai observed 2 staff and 6 residents in the facility. During visit, LPA Rai observed all outdoor and indoor passageways kept free of obstruction and all 6 exit door had removed secondary locks. LPA Rai observed resident R1's half-bed rail and reviewed physician's order for half-bed rail for mobility in resident's file. R1 is now under Hospice services. During visit, LPA Rai provided letter of the Deficiency Citations cleared. No deficiencies were cited at this time as per California Code of Regulations, Title 22. This report was reviewed with Administrator (ADM) Lori Mohassel and a copy of the report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 27, 2024
Sep 27, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Simi Rai and Santino Fortes conducted an unannounced annual inspection, and met with Administrator (ADM) Lori Mohassel. LPAs observed 3 staff and 6 residents at the facility. ADM stated there were 0 residents under Hospice services. LPAs toured the facility inside and out including: kitchen, living room, family room and 1 staff room, 6 resident rooms and 2 restrooms. LPAs observed 6 out of 6 exit doors in the resident rooms had secondary locks on the doors and was not kept free of obstruction wherein the door was not able to open without staff opening the locks with key. LPAs observed locked stoppers on the sliding door railings which restricted the sliding doors from opening. Staff had access to the keys to unlock door stoppers and secondary locks and were able to unlock all the doors during the visit. Licensee and ADM understood to keep all doors free of obstruction. LPAs observed 1 out of 6 beds had attached full bed rail in R1's room. Licensee and administrator stated that R1 was not receiving hospice services. Licensee and ADM will work with R1's primary care physician to obtain written order to use 1/2 bed rail for mobility. Restrooms observed to have non-skid flooring. LPAs observed perishable food supply of at least two days and non-perishable food supply of at least seven days. Refrigerator temperature was observed at 32 degrees F and Freezer temperature was 0 Degrees F. The front yard and backyard of the facility was also inspected. LPA observed one exit fence leading out of the facility was held up with a plank of wood. ADM stated they will repair the fence is not able to close properly. No outside storage shed was observed. LPA observed Facility License and Resident Personal rights were posted. Continuation on LIC 809-C, page 1 of 2. Page 2 of 2. LPA observed the medication storage area, knives storage area, and cleaning product storage area as locked and inaccessible to clients in care. Room temperature was at 74.5 degree F, and hot water temperature was measured from resident bathroom at 119.1 degrees F. LPA inspected the facility first aid kit and it was observed to be complete. The facility was equipped with smoke and carbon monoxide detectors. All smoke detectors functioned properly when tested. Fire extinguishers were last serviced on 9/20/24. The facility conducted their last fire drill on 8/1/24. LPA reviewed facility records for 3 staff and 3 residents. LPA reviewed 3 residents medications and centrally stored medication records. Deficiencies were cited during today's visit as per California Code of Regulations Title 22., see LIC809-D Exit interview was conducted with Lori Mohassel (ADM). This report was reviewed and a copy was provided to ADM for signature. Appeal rights were provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 27, 2024

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Plan of correction due date: Sep 28, 2024

87307(d) The following space and safety provisions shall apply to all facilities: (6) All outdoor and indoor passageways and stairways shall be kept free of obstruction. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on observation and interview, 6 out of 6 exit doors located in the resident rooms had secondary locks which prohibited the door from opening which poses/posed an immediate health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 27, 2024

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Plan of correction due date: Sep 28, 2024

87608(a)(5)(B) Bed rails that extend the entire length of the bed are prohibited except for residents who are currently receiving hospice care and have a hospice care plan that specifies the need for full bed rails. This requirement is not met as evidenced by Based on observation, interview, and record review, R1 had full bed rails attached to the bed and R1 was not receiving hospice services which poses/posed an immediate health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 27, 2024
20231 state visit · 1 document
Oct 23, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Simi Rai conducted an unannounced Required 1 Year visit. LPA Rai met with Administrator (ADM) Lori Mohassel and Licensee (LIN) Zenebesh Ghebresellasie. LPA Rai stated the purposed of today's visit. LPA Rai observed 3 staff in the facility, 3 residents sitting in living room, 1 resident sitting in the dining room, and 2 residents in the resident's rooms. At this time there is one resident under Hospice services. During visit, LPA Rai toured the inside and outside of the facility with LIN and ADM. When touring the outside area of the facility, the exits were cleared of obstruction. LPA Rai toured the facility kitchen and observed food supply of at least 2 days of perishable food and at least 7 days of nonperishable food. Sharps and medications were locked in secured areas. LPA observed secured areas for cleaning supplies and laundry detergents in the garage area. LPA Rai observed oxygen tank in resident R3's room. ADM stated R3 does not use oxygen tank and the oxygen supplier company will pick up the supplies from the resident's room. The facility bathroom had available soap, paper towels, and trash cans with lids. The shower had grab bars and non-skid mats. The water temperature in the bathroom sinks ranged from 105.6F-106.5F. Facility smoke detectors and carbon monoxide detectors were in working condition. 6 out of 6 resident bedrooms had available bedding, drawers, and functioning lights. LPA Rai reviewed facility records for 3 residents. LPA observed 2 residents did not have a completed appraisal/needs and services plan since their admission date. ADM and LIN could not located a completed appraisal/needs and services plan. ADM and LIN stated they will follow up with the resident's responsible party to create an appraisal/needs and services plan. Continuation on LIC 809-C, Page 1 of 3. Page 2 of 3. Facility did not maintain a weight log for 6 out of the 6 residents. LPA Rai reminded ADM and LIN need to observe resident for changes and this includes weight loss and weight gain. ADM and LIN will initiate a weight log for the residents to observe changes such as unusual weight gains or losses. LIN stated the facility staff will initiate measurement of resident's arms or thigh's to monitor resident's weight loss and weight gain for residents that are not able to use the regular weight machine. LPA Rai reviewed resident medications and central stored medication records. LPA Rai, LIN and S1 counted the medications for R1-R3. During a random review/audit of resident's medication bottle and LIC 622 Centrally Stored Medication and Destruction Record, 2 out of 5 medications prescribed to R1 was not given as prescribed by the doctor. LPA Rai along with LIN and S1 counted the tablets from the medication bottles. R1's medication #1 were counted 64 tablets instead of 61 tablets, which concluded there were 3 extra tablets in the bottle and medication was not administered according to the MD's prescription and order on the prescription bottle. R1's medication #4 were counted 67 tablets instead of 64, which concluded there were 3 extra tablets in the bottle. 1 out of 5 medications prescribed to R2 was not given as prescribed by the doctor. LPA Rai along with LIN and S1 counted the tablets from the medication bottles. R2's medication #3 were counted 58 tablets instead of 52 tablets, which concluded there were 6 extra tablets in the bottle and medication was not administered according to the MD's prescription and order on the prescription bottle. 2 out of 2 medications prescribed to R3 was not given as prescribed by the doctor. LPA Rai along with LIN and S1 counted the tablets from the medication bottles. R3's medication #1 were counted 42 tablets instead of 32 tablets, which concluded there were 10 extra tablets in the bottle and medication was not administered according to the MD's prescription and order on the prescription bottle. R3's medication #2 were counted 10 tablets instead the medication bottle being empty and medication was not administered according to the MD's prescription and order on the prescription bottle. LPA Rai review facility records for 3 staff. LPA Rai observed 3 staff members did not have first aid training on file. ADM and LIN stated the facility staff have not been first aid training by a agency such as American Red Cross and 3 out of 3 staff will enrolled to first aid training. ADM and LIN will submit the completed first aid training and or certification to LPA Rai once completed. Page 3 of 3. Deficiencies were cited from California Code of Regulations, Title 22 during today’s visit, see LIC 809-D. 87411 Personnel Requirements - General is being cited during today's visit. LPA Rai would like to clarify the facility personnel being in sufficient in numbers is not the concern, however the facility personnel's actions and documentation are observed to be not competent to provide the services necessary to meet the resident's needs. Exit interview was conducted with Administrator Lori Mohassel and Licensee Zenebesh Ghebresellasie and they both agreed and understood the deficiencies and the Plan of Correction for each citation. A copy of this report and Appeal Rights were provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 23, 2023
What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedthere was not enough evidence to prove a violation occurred — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe evidence showed the allegation was false, could not have happened, or had no reasonable basisType A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗

An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents and the questions below stand in their place.

Who holds the licence

Ghebresellasie, Zenebesh, licensed since 2021, operates 2 licensed homes in California. Running more than one home is common and is neither good nor bad on its own.

Life here

Rooms, meals, the rhythm of a day, faith and language, pets and house rules — as the home describes them. Tap any detail for its source and date; nothing here is graded.

The home has not described daily life anywhere we have reviewed yet — that is the case for most small homes, and it says nothing about the home. These questions fill in the picture; keep the ones that matter to you.

Before you call

Ask every home the same questions — the state’s record does not answer these. Keep the ones that matter and they travel with your saved homes.

  1. What is included in the monthly rate, and what costs extra?
  2. Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?
  3. Which rooms does the non-ambulatory approval cover, and what transfer support is provided?
  4. What could change whether someone can stay here?
  5. Can we see a bedroom and share a meal during a visit?

Other homes nearby

The nearest licensed homes in Santa Clara County, closest first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.

Explore Santa Clara County