Illustration — no photo of this home on file yet

Andrea's Elderly Care Facility #2

Small home·Licensed for 6·Santa Clara, California

Licensed since 2021Licence #435202834
  • Care approvals on fileWheelchair · Hospice · BedriddenState licensing record · September 27, 2026
  • Estimated starting rate$4,900 a monthCovelight estimate · likely $4,000–$6,000
  • Home sizeLicensed for 6Small care home · a licensed care home (RCFE)
  • Room at the last state visit4 of 6 beds occupiedDecember 21, 2024 · not a current opening
  • Ways to payAsk the homeMedi-Cal ALW participation not on file
  • Last state visitAugust 19, 2026CDSS inspection record

Andrea's Elderly Care Facility #2 is a small care home in Santa Clara — a licensed residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE), the licence category behind “assisted living” and “board and care.” It is licensed for 6 residents since 2021. Dementia care is not on file.

Built from CDSS public records · September 27, 2026. Every fact below names its source and date.

Quick answers and the state record

A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

Quick answers about Andrea's Elderly Care Facility #2

Is Andrea's Elderly Care Facility #2 licensed?

The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

How many residents is Andrea's Elderly Care Facility #2 licensed for?

6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Has Andrea's Elderly Care Facility #2 been cited?

0 Type A and 0 Type B citations since 2021, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. Those records count 7 state visits over the same years.

Is Andrea's Elderly Care Facility #2 still open?

This license was on the CDSS roster as of September 28, 2026.

What does Andrea's Elderly Care Facility #2 cost?

$4,900 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $4,000–$6,000. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 10 small homes and similar homes within 3 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

Among 80 other homes of a similar licensed size across Santa Clara County that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $3,850 to $5,000 a month, and the middle figure is $4,200 (n = 80 other homes publishing a starting rate).

Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.

A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.

The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.

A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.

Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.

Does Andrea's Elderly Care Facility #2 take Medi-Cal?

On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.

Who holds the license?

The license is held by Roque, Percival & Roque, Felina, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Is there a hospital nearby?

O'Connor Hospital is 1.5 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.

Can Andrea's Elderly Care Facility #2 keep a resident on hospice?

Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 3 residents, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Andrea's Elderly Care Facility #2 license and inspection record

  • Name on the license: “ANDREA'S ELDERLY CARE FACILITY #2”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
  • License #435202834. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • Licensed for 6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • Licensed to Roque, Percival & Roque, Felina, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • First licensed in 2021, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • 7 state inspection visits since 2021, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • 0 Type A and 0 Type B citations on file since 2021, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. The same records count 7 state visits in that period.
  • 2 complaints and 0 substantiated allegations on file since 2021, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
  • The most recent state visit on file is August 19, 2026, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
Type A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗

See the state’s own record

Can they support the care needed?

California licenses a home for specific kinds of care. The state’s record lists what this home is approved for; the home’s own answers fill in what changes as needs change.

  • Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved · covers up to 6 residents
  • Dementia / memory careNot on file · ask the home
  • Hospice careApproved · covers up to 3 residents
  • BedriddenApproved · covers up to 1 resident

State licensing record · September 27, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.

Read the state’s own wording
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. APPROVED FOR 6 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH ONE (1) MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. "LICENSE IS SUBJECT TO THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE HOSPICE WAIVER FOR THREE (3)."

935 - ELDERLY

CDSS record, verbatim · September 27, 2026

As needs change

  • Staying through hospice

    Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 3 — care may continue at the end of life

    Ask: “If hospice is needed, can care continue here until the end?”

    State licensing record · September 27, 2026

4 more questions to ask the home
  • Two-person transfers or a lift

    Not on file

    Ask: “If two people or a lift are needed to transfer, can the person stay?”

  • Someone awake overnight

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?”

  • Medicines

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who manages the medicines, and what happens when a dose is missed?”

  • If memory loss develops

    Dementia-care designation not on file

    Ask: “If memory loss develops, what would change — and when would a move be needed?”

What it costs here

Covelight estimate

$4,900a month to start

Likely $4,000–$6,000

From 10 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file

Likely monthly total

$4,900a month

Likely $4,000–$6,200

With a shared room and basic help.

An estimate for planning, not a quote. The price is made in the phone call.

See the full cost breakdownRoom, care and fees · how people pay · how this estimate works
Room
Daily care
Sharing the room

Memory care is not priced here: a dementia-care designation is not on file for this home. Ask the home.

  • Starting monthly rate$4,900likely $4,000–$6,000

    Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 10 small homes and similar homes within 3 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

  • Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600

    Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (45 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).

  • One-time move-in fee$2,000one time · likely $0–$4,000

    Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,000 (134 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.

Likely monthly totalLikely $4,000–$6,200
$4,900
First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $4,700–$9,300
$6,900
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
  • Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
  • Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
  • SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
  • VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
  • Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
  • MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
If the money runs out, what Medi-Cal covers
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
  • The care level

    Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.

  • What is billed separately

    Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.

  • Move-in costs

    A one-time community fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.

  • Increases

    California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.

  • What is the full monthly cost for the room and care we need, and what does it include?
  • What would the next care level cost, and who decides when it changes?
  • What is billed separately, and is there a one-time fee or deposit at move-in?
  • Is any private-pay period required before another payment program can begin?
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 10 small homes and similar homes within 3 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

10 homes like this within 3 miles publish starting rates mostly between $3,000–$5,600.

  • Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
  • Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
  • Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
  • Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
  • We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
  • It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Show the 10 nearby homes behind this estimate

Where it is

  • 1525 Franklin St., Santa Clara, CA 95050Address from the public record · September 27, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.

Opening the neighborhood map…

The state record

California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. Here are the dated documents and the state’s own words, beside what is typical for homes this size.

Since 2021, the state has filed 8 documents for this home, and its records count 7 visits since 2021. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated August 19, 2026.

On file since
2021
State visits
7
Most recent visit
August 19, 2026
Occupied · December 21, 2024 visit
4 of 6 bedsa count on that day, not an opening

We hold 2 complaint reports the state published for this home, dated May 31, 2024 to December 21, 2024. 2 of the 2 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Unfounded” (2). 2 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word. Summary composed by computer from the 2 complaint reports below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

Beside homes the same size

  • Type A citations0typical 0
  • Type B citations0typical 0
  • Substantiated allegations0typical 0
  • Total complaints2typical 0

“Typical” is the statewide median across the 6,808 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this licence since 2021.

Year by year
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated20261102025110202444020221102021110

The last 36 months — 6 of 8 documents

20261 state visit · 1 document
Aug 19, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Simi Rai conducted an unannounced Required 1 Year visit. LPA Rai met with Administrator, Lerma Espiritu and stated the purpose of today's visit. LPA Rai observed 3 staff and 5 residents at the facility. During visit, LPA Rai toured the inside and outside of the facility. When touring the outside area of the facility, the exits were cleared of obstruction. LPA Rai toured the facility kitchen and observed food supply of at least 2 days of perishable food and at least 7 days of nonperishable food. Sharps and medications were locked in secured areas. LPA observed additional food supply areas and secured areas for cleaning supplies and laundry detergents. The basement was locked and was used for storage and not habitual space. LPA Rai toured the facility to include 5 resident rooms, living room, dining room, kitchen and garage. 5 Out of 5 resident bedrooms had available bedding, drawers, and functioning lights. The facility bathroom had available soap, paper towels, and trash cans with lids. The hot water temperature in the bathroom and kitchen sink ranged from 105.6 - 107.8 degrees F. Fire extinguisher was observed and inspected on 10/07/2025. LPA Rai observed a complete first aid kit at the facility. LPA Rai reviewed facility records for 2 staff and 2 residents. LPA Rai reviewed resident medications and central stored medication records. No deficiencies were cited per California Code of Regulations, Title 22. This report was reviewed with Administrator, Lerma Espiritu and a copy of the report was provided. LIC 858 and LIC 859 were provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 19, 2026
20251 state visit · 1 document
Aug 25, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

On 8/25/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Grace Donato conducted an unannounced annual visit. LPA met with Administrator, Lerma Espiritu and explained the purpose of the visit.. During visit, LPA toured the inside and outside of the facility. When touring the outside area of the facility, the exits were cleared of obstruction. LPA toured the facility kitchen and observed food supply of at least 2 days of perishable food and at least 7 days of nonperishable food. Sharps and medications were locked in secured areas. LPA observed additional food supply areas and secured areas for cleaning supplies and laundry detergents. Facility is a single story home with four resident rooms. While touring the facility it was observed that the room temperature was at 69 deg F. The facility is observed to be clean, odorless, and well maintained. Residents bedrooms were observed to be well organized and fully furnished with adequate lighting. Carbon monoxide/ smoke detectors, and fire extinguisher were present throughout the facility. Facility has an updated log for emergency drill will is done quarterly. Four resident records and four staff records were reviewed. Centrally stored medication was locked and inaccessible by residents. All medication was labeled and sorted by resident name. All medication logs are complete and updated. Licensee to email Administrator Certificate and Liability Insurance. No deficiencies cited today. Report is reviewed and copy is provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 25, 2025
20244 state visits · 4 documents
Dec 21, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Staff handles resident in a rough manner. Staff speaks inappropriately to resident.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Simi Rai conducted an unannounced visit to conclude the complaint investigation. LPA Rai met with the Administrator and stated the purpose of today’s visit. On 7/29/2024, the Department received a complaint with the above allegations. On 8/8/2024, the Department conducted an initial investigation at the facility. Continuation on LIC 9099-C, Page 1 of 3. Unfounded Page 2 of 3. Staff handles resident in a rough manner. It was alleged facility staff are rough when they clean resident (R1). On 8/8/2024, the Department interviewed 4 staff (S1-S4). Four out of four staff stated the staff are not rough when they clean R1. Three out of the four staff interviewed provide direct care to R1. Three out of three staff stated they are not rough when they clean resident (R1). All three staff stated they are gentle with R1. All three staff stated they follow R1’s directions when they provide care, so the staff are not rough. On 8/8/2024, the Department interviewed 5 residents (R1-R5). Three out of five residents did not answer LPA’s questions or refused to be interviewed. Two out of two residents stated they receive care and assistance from the facility staff and the staff are not rough with them. Based on review of staff training in 2024, staff have received the following training including Sexual Harassment & Abusive Conduct Prevention Training. Staff speaks inappropriately to resident. It was alleged facility staff are verbally abusive to resident (R1) but details about the verbal abuse incident were not provided. On 8/8/2024, the Department interviewed 4 staff (S1-S4). Four out of four staff stated they staff do not use inappropriate words to the resident. All four staff stated R1 is hard of hearing and staff will speak loudly to R1. Four out of four staff stated they do not see or hear other facility staff speaking inappropriately to resident. On 8/8/2024, the Department interviewed 5 residents (R1-R5). Three out of five residents did not answer LPA’s questions or refused to be interviewed. Two out of two residents stated they receive care and assistance from the facility staff and the staff are not rough with them. Page 3 of 3. Based on review of staff training in 2024, staff have received the following training including Sexual Harassment & Abusive Conduct Prevention Training. The Department has completed the investigation of the above allegations. Based on interviews conducted and record reviews, the department has found that the above allegations were UNFOUNDED, meaning that the allegations were false, could not have happened and/or are without a reasonable basis. No deficiencies cited from California Code of Regulations, Title 22. Exit interview conducted with Administrator and a copy of the report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 21, 2024 · control 26-AS-20240729100816
Aug 8, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Simi Rai conducted an unannounced Required 1 Year visit and met with Back-Up Administrator/Lead Staff, Lerma Espiritu. LPA Rai observed 2 staff and 6 residents at the facility. During visit, LPA Rai toured the inside and outside of the facility. When touring the outside area of the facility, the exits were cleared of obstruction. LPA Rai toured the basement of the facility and observe the space being used as storage and not habitual space. LPA Rai toured the facility kitchen and observed food supply of at least 2 days of perishable food and at least 7 days of nonperishable food. Sharps and medications were locked in secured areas. LPA observed additional food supply areas and secured areas for cleaning supplies and laundry detergents. LPA Rai toured the resident bedrooms. 5 out of 5 resident bedrooms had available bedding, drawers, and functioning lights. LPA Rai reviewed the facility sketch on file as well as the facility sketch posted on the bulletin wall at the facility, which describe the floor plan to have 4 bedrooms, not 5 as observed during visit. LPA Rai spoke with Licensee, Felina Roque who stated the 5th bedroom was added to the facility and they have a city permit to build the room. LPA Rai requested for Licensee Felina to submit the updated facility sketch. The facility bathroom had available soap, paper towels, and trash cans with lids. The water temperature in the bathroom sinks ranged from 105.4 degrees F - 105.7 degrees F. The water temperature in the kitchen sink was 105.9F. Fire extinguisher was observed and inspected on 10/10/2023. Facility smoke detectors and carbon monoxide detectors were in working condition. The last disaster drills was conducted on 07/08/2024 and 07/10/2024. Continuation on LIC 809-C, Page 1 of 2. Page 2 of 2. LPA Rai reviewed facility records for 2 staff and 2 residents. LPA Rai reviewed resident medications and central stored medication records. During visit, LPA Rai observed 5 out of 5 resident beds had attached half-bed rails. LPA Rai reviewed resident files and observed a written order to use half-bed rails for mobility. No deficiencies were cited per California Code of Regulations, Title 22. This report was reviewed with Back-Up Administrator/Lead Staff, Lerma Espiritu and a copy of the report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 8, 2024
May 31, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Staff member yells at resident in care.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Simi Rai conducted an unannounced visit to conclude the complaint investigation. LPA Rai met with Licensee, Felina Roque and stated the purpose of today’s visit. During visit, LPA Rai observed three staff members and 6 residents in the resident rooms. On 3/1/2024, the Department received a complaint with the above allegations. On 3/6/2024, the Department conducted an initial investigation at the facility. It was alleged the facility staff were yelling at resident (R1) when R1 requests for help. Continuation on LIC 9099-C, Page 1 of 2. Unfounded Page 2 of 2. On 3/6/2024, LPA Rai conducted interviews with 2 staff (S1-S2). S1 and S2 assist resident with care and supervision, and they have stated they do not yell or shout at the residents at the facility. They stated R1 is hard of hearing and staff will speak loudly to R1. 2 out of 2 staff stated they did not see or hear other facility staff yell at the residents. On 3/6/2024, LPA Rai conducted interviews with 5 residents. 3 Out of 5 residents were not able to verbally communicate with LPA Rai. LPA Rai was able to interview 2 residents (R1-R2). R1 stated S1 yells at him/her but “its not his fault, it’s China zodiac sign’s fault that R1 is mad”. R1 stated staff are not yelling at him/her because R1 cannot hear and needs staff to raise their voices. R2 stated the staff do not yell but the residents are yelling at the facility staff. R2 stated the staff “treat me nice” and R2 “feels safe and comfortable”. R2 stated the staff are not angry or agitated. Based on R1’s Needs and Services Plan dated 2/29/2024, R1 is dependent in all activities of daily living and one of the objectives for staff to reassure R1 that caregivers are there to help and assist R1 and staff are always there to listen and assist R1 if there is a problem. Based on R1’s Physician’s Report dated 6/19/2023, R1 does not have auditory impairment. On 3/19/2024, the Department interviewed R1’s primary care physician (PCP). PCP stated R1 is hard of hearing and that may be the reason why the staff will raise their voice. PCP does not believe the staff have malicious intent. The Department has completed the investigation of the above allegation. Based on interviews conducted and record reviews, the Department has found that the above allegation were UNFOUNDED, meaning that the allegations were false, could not have happened and/or are without a reasonable basis. No deficiencies cited from California Code of Regulations, Title 22. Exit interview conducted with Licensee, Felina Roque and a copy of the report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 31, 2024 · control 26-AS-20240301084844
Mar 6, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Other

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Simi Rai conducted an case management visit to address information obtained during today's complaint investigation visit. LPA Rai met with Back-Up Administrator/Lead Staff, Lerma Espiritu and stated the purpose of the visit. During today's visit, LPA interviewed staff (S2). S2 was not associated to the facility as of 3/5/2024. Upon further investigation, S2 has a California criminal record clearance and is associated to another licensed facilty but is not associated to this facility. Per interview with S2, S2 did work with the facilty before and left around 2020, but came back to work with the residents as a caregiver in June/July 2023. S2 did confirm to work at the facility January 2024 - March 2024. Back-Up Administrator/Lead Staff and LPA Rai reviewed S2's staff file and did observe LIC 9182 Criminal Background Clearance Transfer Request made in 2019 to transfer S2's criminal record clearance to the facility. Per Guardian, S2 was separated from the facility in 2020. Back-Up Administrator/Lead Staff stated the facility did not transfer S2's criminal record clearance when S2 returned to work at the facility in 2023. Back-Up Administrator/Lead Staff, Lerma Espiritu stated the facility will transfer S2's criminal record clearance to the facility tonight 3/6/2024. A civil penalty is being assessed for the amount of $500 ($100 per day x 5 days = $500), for staff (S2) working at the facility without a Criminal Background clearance transfer. Please see LIC 421BG. Deficiencies were cited per California Code of Regulations, Title 22, please see LIC 809-D. This report was reviewed with Back-Up Administrator/Lead Staff, Lerma Espiritu. A copy of the report and Appeal Rights were provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 6, 2024

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87355(e)(2) · Plan of correction due date: Mar 7, 2024

87355 Criminal Record Clearance (e) All individuals subject to a criminal record review ...shall prior to working, residing or volunteering in a licensed facility: (2) Request a transfer of a criminal record clearance as specified in Section 87355(c). This requirement is met as evidenced by: Based on interview and record review, staff (S2) has obtain a California clearance but criminal record clearance has not been transferred to this facility, which poses/posed an immediate Health, Safety, or Personal Rights risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 6, 2024

Plan of correction: Administrator stated to submit a written plan of action understanding regulation and will ensure S2 is associated to the facility by POC due date. Administrator agreed and understood.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedthere was not enough evidence to prove a violation occurred — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe evidence showed the allegation was false, could not have happened, or had no reasonable basisType A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗

An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents and the questions below stand in their place.

Life here

Rooms, meals, the rhythm of a day, faith and language, pets and house rules — as the home describes them. Tap any detail for its source and date; nothing here is graded.

The home has not described daily life anywhere we have reviewed yet — that is the case for most small homes, and it says nothing about the home. These questions fill in the picture; keep the ones that matter to you.

Before you call

Ask every home the same questions — the state’s record does not answer these. Keep the ones that matter and they travel with your saved homes.

  1. What is included in the monthly rate, and what costs extra?
  2. Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?
  3. Which rooms does the non-ambulatory approval cover, and what transfer support is provided?
  4. What could change whether someone can stay here?
  5. Can we see a bedroom and share a meal during a visit?

Other homes nearby

The nearest licensed homes in Santa Clara County, closest first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.

Explore Santa Clara County