Illustration — no photo of this home on file yet
Ivy Park at Palo Alto
Large community·Licensed for 97·Palo Alto, California
- Care approvals on fileWheelchair · Dementia · Hospice · BedriddenState licensing record · September 27, 2026
- Estimated starting rate$5,350 a monthCovelight estimate · likely $4,150–$6,800
- Home sizeLicensed for 97Large care community · a licensed care home (RCFE)
- Room at the last state visit85 of 97 beds occupiedJuly 9, 2026 · not a current opening
- Ways to payAsk the homeMedi-Cal ALW participation not on file
- Last state visitAugust 18, 2026CDSS inspection record
- Licence holderTransformer Opco LLC;Oakmont Management Group LLCSince date not on file · 20 licensed homes
Ivy Park at Palo Alto is a large care community in Palo Alto — a licensed residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE), the licence category behind “assisted living” and “board and care.” It is licensed for 97 residents.
Built from CDSS public records · September 27, 2026. Every fact below names its source and date.
Quick answers and the state record
A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.
Quick answers about Ivy Park at Palo Alto
Is Ivy Park at Palo Alto licensed?
The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
How many residents is Ivy Park at Palo Alto licensed for?
97 residents — a large community, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
Has Ivy Park at Palo Alto been cited?
0 Type A and 0 Type B citations, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
Is Ivy Park at Palo Alto still open?
This license was on the CDSS roster as of September 28, 2026.
What does Ivy Park at Palo Alto cost?
$5,350 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $4,150–$6,800. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 18 communities with 50 or more beds within 10 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
Among 33 other homes of a similar licensed size across Santa Clara County that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $4,469 to $6,496 a month, and the middle figure is $5,237 (n = 33 other homes publishing a starting rate).
Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.
A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.
The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.
A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.
Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
Does Ivy Park at Palo Alto take Medi-Cal?
On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
Who holds the license?
The license is held by Transformer Opco LLC;Oakmont Management Group LLC, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. See the homes licensed to Oakmont Management Group LLC — at least 56 on the state roster.
Is there a hospital nearby?
Lucile Salter Packard Children's Hospital Stanford is 2.9 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.
Can Ivy Park at Palo Alto keep a resident on hospice?
Hospice care is approved on this license, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
Ivy Park at Palo Alto license and inspection record
- Name on the license: “IVY PARK AT PALO ALTO”, per the CDSS roster as of June 12, 2026.
- License #435202929. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
- Licensed for 97 residents — a large community, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
- Licensed to Transformer Opco LLC;Oakmont Management Group LLC, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
- First licensed: the year is not on file — the roster carries no first-license date for it. Ask: “When did this license start?”
- 10 state inspection visits on file, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
- 0 Type A and 0 Type B citations on file, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
- 3 complaints and 0 substantiated allegations on file, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
- The most recent state visit on file is August 18, 2026, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗
Can they support the care needed?
California licenses a home for specific kinds of care. The state’s record lists what this home is approved for; the home’s own answers fill in what changes as needs change.
- Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved · covers up to 97 residents
- Dementia / memory careApproved by the state
- Hospice careApproved by the state
- BedriddenApproved · covers up to 8 residents
State licensing record · September 27, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.
Read the state’s own wording
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 97 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 8 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. HOSPICE WAIVER GRANTED FOR (18).
983 - RCFE / DEMENTIA
CDSS record, verbatim · September 27, 2026
As needs change
- Staying through hospice
Hospice waiver on file — care may continue at the end of life
Ask: “If hospice is needed, can care continue here until the end?”
State licensing record · September 27, 2026
- If memory loss develops
Dementia-care designation on file
Ask: “Can we read the dementia care disclosure and discuss how daily support works?”
State licensing record · September 27, 2026
3 more questions to ask the home
- Two-person transfers or a lift
Not on file
Ask: “If two people or a lift are needed to transfer, can the person stay?”
- Someone awake overnight
Not on file
Ask: “Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?”
- Medicines
Not on file
Ask: “Who manages the medicines, and what happens when a dose is missed?”
What it costs here
Covelight estimate
$5,350a month to start
Likely $4,150–$6,800
From 18 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file
Likely monthly total
$5,350a month
Likely $4,150–$6,950
With a studio and basic help.
An estimate for planning, not a quote. The price is made in the phone call.
See the full cost breakdownRoom, care and fees · how people pay · how this estimate works
Starting monthly rate$5,350likely $4,150–$6,800
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 18 communities with 50 or more beds within 10 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600
Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (45 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).
One-time move-in fee$2,000one time · likely $0–$4,000
Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,000 (134 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.
- Likely monthly totalLikely $4,150–$6,950
- $5,350
- First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $5,000–$9,900
- $7,350
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
- Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
- Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
- SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
- VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
- Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
- MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
- The care level
Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.
- What is billed separately
Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.
- Move-in costs
A one-time community fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.
- Increases
California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.
- What is the full monthly cost for the room and care we need, and what does it include?
- What would the next care level cost, and who decides when it changes?
- What is billed separately, and is there a one-time fee or deposit at move-in?
- Is any private-pay period required before another payment program can begin?
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 18 communities with 50 or more beds within 10 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
18 homes like this within 10 miles publish starting rates mostly between $5,150–$8,500.
- Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
- Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
- Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
- Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
- We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
- It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Show the 18 nearby homes behind this estimate
- Palo Alto CommonsPalo Alto · 0.0 mi · Large community$7,050Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Bridgepoint at Los AltosLos Altos · 0.9 mi · Large community$5,250Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Moldaw Family Residences at 899 CharlestonPalo Alto · 1.4 mi · Large community$8,500Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Webster HousePalo Alto · 3.0 mi · Large community$6,500Listed on Seniorly · independent living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Villa SienaMountain View · 3.6 mi · Large community$5,237Listed on Seniorly · assisted living studio · seen September 9, 2026
- Sunrise of SunnyvaleSunnyvale · 4.7 mi · Large community$7,904Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Sunnyside GardensSunnyvale · 5.0 mi · Large community$5,200Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Oakmont of Redwood CityRedwood City · 5.9 mi · Large community$6,495Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Kensington Place Redwood CityRedwood City · 6.1 mi · Large community$15,000Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Gordon ManorRedwood City · 6.5 mi · Large community$8,500Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Marbella Redwood CityRedwood City · 6.5 mi · Large community$4,950Listed on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026
- Atria SunnyvaleSunnyvale · 6.6 mi · Large community$3,995Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Sunrise of CupertinoSunnyvale · 7.6 mi · Large community$9,789Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Belmont Village SunnyvaleSunnyvale · 7.9 mi · Large community$7,000Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Hopkins ManorRedwood City · 8.0 mi · Large community$5,000Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Pacific GardensSanta Clara · 8.0 mi · Large community$5,275Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Ellore Senior LivingSanta Clara · 8.8 mi · Large community$6,995Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- San Carlos ElmsSan Carlos · 9.6 mi · Large community$6,274Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
Where it is
- 2701 El Camino Road, Palo Alto, CA 94306Address from the public record · September 27, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.
Opening the neighborhood map…
The state record
California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. Here are the dated documents and the state’s own words, beside what is typical for homes this size.
Since 2025, the state has filed 10 documents for this home, and its records count 10 visits. The most recent — a complaint investigation report on July 9, 2026 — closed with the state’s outcome word: “Unsubstantiated.”
- On file since
- 2025
- State visits
- 10
- Most recent visit
- August 18, 2026
- Occupied · July 9, 2026 visit
- 85 of 97 bedsa count on that day, not an opening
We hold 3 complaint reports the state published for this home, dated February 19, 2026 to July 9, 2026. 3 of the 3 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Unsubstantiated” (3). 3 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word. Summary composed by computer from the 3 complaint reports below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.
Beside homes the same size
- Type A citations0typical 0
- Type B citations0typical 1
- Substantiated allegations0typical 2
- Total complaints3typical 6
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,354 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations.
Year by year
The last 36 months — 10 of 10 documents
Jul 9, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: -Staff are not changing the resident's linens. -Staff are not providing laundry services to a resident in care. -Staff did not respond to resident's call button. -Staff are not disposing of the resident's trash. -Facility did not ensure that staff are properly trained. -Staff did not administer medication as prescribed.
On 07/09/2026, Licensing Program analyst (LPA) Yi Sam Jian conducted an unannounced complaint investigation visit. LPA met with the Executive Director, Stephanie Brice, and disclosed the purpose of the visit. Regarding the allegation that staffs are not changing resident’s linens, interviews conducted during the investigation indicated that the facility maintained a routine schedule for linen changes and that services were provided to residents on an ongoing basis. The investigation did not identify sufficient evidence demonstrating that the facility failed to provide linen services. Regarding the allegation that staffs are not providing laundry services, information obtained during the investigation indicated that laundry services were routinely provided by the facility and that residents also retained the ability to complete laundry independently if desired. Unsubstantiated Regarding the allegation that staffs did not respond to resident call lights, interviews conducted during the investigation did not identify sufficient evidence demonstrating that staff did not respond to resident requests for assistance. Regarding the allegation that staff did not dispose of resident’s trash, information obtained during the investigation indicated that the facility maintained routine housekeeping practices, including regular trash removal. Regarding the allegation that the facility did not ensure that staff were properly trained, documentation obtained during the investigation indicated that the facility maintained records of training for the staff. Regarding the allegation that staff did not administer medications as prescribed, documentation obtained during the investigation indicated that the facility maintained medication administration procedures and safeguards. Although the above allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. No deficiencies cited during today's visit. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of the report provided to facility representatives.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 9, 2026 · control 26-AS-20260429103707
Jul 7, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Annual Continuation
On 7/7/2026, Licensing Program Analyst(LPA) John Calandra arrived at the facility to complete the Annual 1-year required inspection. LPA Calandra was greeted by Stephanie Brice, Executive Director and explained the purpose of the visit. A review of Centrally stored medications indicated that medications for residents were properly labeled with instructions on dosage and times of day and matched the Centrally Stored Medication records kept at the facility. No deficiencies cited during today's visit. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of the report was provided to facility representative.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 7, 2026
Jul 3, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
On 7/3/2026, Licensing Program Analyst(LPA) John Calandra arrived at the facility, to conduct the Annual 1-year required inspection. LPA Calandra was greeted by Stephanie Brice, Executive Director and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA toured the physical plant. This is a 1-story building with 4 floors(the first, second, and fourth floors are Assisted Living and third floor is memory care) a kitchen, dining room, offices, parking garage, and front and backyards. All bedrooms had the required furniture and sufficient lighting. All bathrooms had the required grab bars and anti-skid flooring. No accessible bodies of water or hazards were observed. The facility's smoke alarms and Carbon monoxide detectors were observed to be in working order. The facility's fire extinguisher was last checked on December 23, 2025 and was observed to be fully charged. The facility's first aid kit was observed to have all of the required items. The facility had the required 7 days of non perishables and 2 days of perishables on site. No food was expired. All sharp objects, soap, detergents, and poisons were observed to be locked and in-accessible to persons in care. LPA reviewed 5 resident files and 5 staff files. All were observed to be complete. During the visit, LPA collected the facility's Liability Insurance policy and asked the facility to send their LIC 500 Personnel Summary Report by 7/10/2026. No deficiencies cited during today's visit. This Annual will be completed at a later date. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of the report provided to the facility representative.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 3, 2026
Mar 19, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Other
On 03/19/2026, Licensed Program Analyst (LPA) Yi Sam Jian arrived at the facility to deliver amended copies of LIC9099. LPA met with administrator, Stephanie Brice. LPA explained the purpose of the visit. LPA conducted interview with staffs and residents. Reports were reviewed with administrator and copies were provided to facility.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 19, 2026
Feb 19, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Facility staff do not receive training as required Facility staff are mismanaging residents' medications
THIS IS AN AMENDED REPORT FROM AN ORIGINAL REPORT DATED 02/19/2026. On 2/19/2026, Licensing Program analyst (LPA) Yi Sam Jian conducted an unannounced complaint investigation visit. LPA met with the Executive Director, Stephanie Brice, and disclosed the purpose of the visit. Regarding the allegation that facility staff do not receive training as required, the Department conducted investigation. Interviews with staff indicated that staff reported receiving training. A review of facility records showed documentation of staff training. Regarding the allegation that facility staff are mismanaging residents’ medications, the Department conducted investigation. Medication Administration Records (MARs) for residents in care were reviewed and reflected medications being documented and administered according to facility procedures. Residents and staff interviewed reported that medications were received as prescribed. Although the above allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove whether the allegations did or did not occur, therefore the above allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED. Report is reviewed and a copy of this report is provided to the administrator. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 19, 2026 · control 26-AS-20251202141717
Feb 19, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: - Staff member worked while under the influence of alcohol/drugs, impairing their ability to provide adequate care and supervision, which presents a risk to the residents in care
THIS IS AN AMENDED REPORT FROM AN ORIGINAL REPORT DATED 02/19/2026. On 2/19/2026, Licensing Program analyst (LPA) Yi Sam Jian conducted an unannounced complaint investigation visit. LPA met with the Executive Director, Stephanie Brice, and disclosed the purpose of the visit. During the visit, LPA interviewed staff and residents and collected documents. Regarding the allegation that a staff member worked while under the influence of alcohol or drugs, impairing their ability to provide adequate care and supervision and presenting a risk to residents in care, the Department conducted investigation. Interviews with residents and staff indicated that staff were observed performing their duties without signs of being under the influence of alcohol or drugs, and residents reported no concerns related to staff substance use. Review of facility records indicated that staff had received the facility’s drug and alcohol free policy and relevant trainings. Although the above allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove whether the allegations did or did not occur, therefore the above allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED. Report is reviewed and a copy of this report is provided to the administrator. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 19, 2026 · control 26-AS-20251201101232
Aug 27, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Other
On 08/27/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kiran Jain arrived unannounced at the facility to conduct a Case Management - Other visit. Upon arrival, LPA met with the Executive Director, Stephanie Brice, and disclosed the purpose of the visit. On 06/20/2025, 08/12/2025, and 08/21/2025, the LPA conducted Complaint investigations at the facility for complaint #26-AS-20250616122012. On 07/23/2025 and 08/20/2025, 5 of 5 staff members (ED, S1-S4) stated and acknowledged that homeless individuals had entered the premises on multiple occasions between November 2024 and May 2025. Two (2) residents (R1 and R2) reported missing/stolen cash/money from their rooms in the past five (5) months. On 08/21/2025, the LPA reviewed the facility’s records for past Incident Reports and found that no incident reports had been submitted by the facility to CCL regarding homeless individuals entering the facility premises. On 08/21/2025, the LPA reviewed the facility’s records for past Incident Reports and found that no reports had been submitted by the facility to CCL regarding residents reporting missing cash/money from their rooms. On 08/27/2025, the facility was not able to provide copies of notification to the local law enforcement agency regarding stolen cash/money incidents from R1 and R2’s room for more than $100. No deficiencies were cited during today's visit. Advisory Notes were being issued today, see LIC9102. An exit interview was conducted with the Executive Director. A copy of this report was provided to the Executive Director, Stephanie Brice, whose signature on this form confirms receipt of the report.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 27, 2025
Jul 3, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Incident
On July 03, 2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kiran Jain arrived unannounced at the facility to conduct a Case Management – Incident visit regarding an incident that occurred on 06/20/2025 when the resident (R1) eloped from the facility. Upon arrival, LPA met with the Executive Director (ED), Stephanie Brice, and disclosed the purpose of the visit. LPA interviewed one (1) staff member: ED, and one (1) resident (R1). The ED stated that on 06/20/2025, at approximately 7 PM, S1 responded to the first-floor stairwell exit alarm. S1 did not see anyone around the exit, so S1 immediately called out on the walkie-talkie for the team to start apartment checks to ensure all residents were accounted for. At approximately 7:05 PM, S1 reported to the ED that R1 could not be located. Apartment checks continued, and other facility staff members began searching the outside areas and the immediate neighborhood. ED stated R1 lives on the fourth floor, and they are not sure if R1 took stairs from the fourth or any other floor. ED stated that at approximately 7:10 PM, the facility received a call from R1's former Physical Therapist (PT), who stated that R1 was with them and that they were bringing R1 back to the community. The ED contacted R1’s Responsible Party (RP) to inform them about the incident. R1 was brought back to the community. The PT informed the ED that they had seen R1 at the corner of El Camino and California Avenue. R1 stated that they had gone for a walk but forgot how to get back. ED stated that before the elopement incident on 06/20/2025, R1 was not wearing a safety bracelet. But after R1 returned, the facility ensured that R1 is wearing wander guard bracelet all the time. Med techs are checking three times a day to ensure R1 is wearing a wander guard bracelet. Continued on LIC809-C LPA reviewed R1’s Physician’s Report (LIC 602), dated 03/30/2025, R1 was non-ambulatory, had a primary diagnosis of Alzheimer's Dementia, was deemed not able to leave the facility unassisted. LPA reviewed R1’s Individualized Service Plan (ISP), dated 04/01/2025, which stated that R1 was ambulatory and unable to leave the community unsupervised. The ISP further stated that R1 was required to wear a safety bracelet while residing in the Assisted Living. LPA conducted a health and wellness check on R1 by visiting R1’s room. R1 stated that they did not have any recollection of whether they had exited the building alone without anyone accompanying them. R1 also stated that they liked to walk outside and inside the facility and use the elevators to go down to the first floor. R1 resided in the Assisted Living unit of the facility and was not wearing a safety bracelet at the time of the elopement. Facility staff did not ensure that R1 didn’t leave the facility unaccompanied, and a safety bracelet was not placed on R1’s arm prior to the elopement incident. Facility staff placed a wander guard bracelet on R1 only after the elopement incident occurred on 06/20/2025. A deficiency was cited based on LPA observations, records reviewed, and interviews conducted in accordance with the California Code of Regulations, Title 22, see LIC809D. An exit interview was conducted, and Plans of Correction were reviewed and developed with the Executive Director. A copy of this report and appeal rights were discussed and provided to the Executive Director, Stephanie Brice, whose signature on this form confirms receipt of these documents.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 3, 2025
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87411(a) · Plan of correction due date: Jul 4, 2025
87411 Personnel Requirements – General (a) Facility personnel shall at all times be sufficient in numbers, and competent to provide the services necessary to meet resident needs. This requirement was not met as evidenced by: The facility staff were not able to prevent the resident (R1) from eloping the facility. R1 has dementia, is deemed not able to leave the facility unassisted, and was able to leave the facility unaccompanied around 7 PM on 06/20/2025, which posed an immediate health, safety, or personal rights risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 3, 2025
Plan of correction: The ED will submit a POC plan to ensure that R1 wears a wander guard bracelet and is safe all the time. The ED will provide a copy of the plan to CCLD by 07/04/2025.
May 28, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Prelicensing
On May 28, 2025, the Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kiran Jain arrived announced at the facility to conduct a Pre-licensing Change of Ownership inspection. The LPA met with the Executive Director, Stephanie Brice, and disclosed the purpose of the inspection. The facility has an approved fire clearance for (89) non-ambulatory and (8) bedridden residents. The facility is a four-story building with first, second, and fourth floor for Assisted Living and third floor for Memory Care. Assisted Living had 60 rooms and Memory Care had 28 rooms. The ED informed the LPA that the facility had 66 residents in care at the time. At 10:25 AM, LPA initiated a walk-through of the facility, accompanied by ED. LPA inspected randomly selected eight (8) resident rooms in Assisted Living and Memory Care units. The rooms were found to be clean, well-lit, and equipped with the required furniture. Emergency pull cords were observed to be functioning in the resident rooms with an average response time of 15 minutes. LPA inspected the private bathrooms in random rooms. The bathrooms contained soap, grab bars, towels, a trash can, and non-slip flooring. The hot water temperature at the sink faucets measured between 111.7°F and 116.4°F. “Oxygen in Use/No smoking” signs were observed posted outside the residents’ room where oxygen was administered. LPA inspected activity areas, library, media room, Theater room, exercise room, and other commons areas and observed residents actively engaged in recreational programs and activities. Activity calendar was observed posted at various locations throughout the facility. All common areas were free from obstructions, and hallways were well-lit. Continued on LIC809-C LPA inspected laundry rooms on each floor and observed working washer and dryer units. Sharp objects, detergents, and chemicals were observed to be locked and inaccessible to persons in care. LPA observed locked centrally stored medication carts in the Assisted Living and Memory Care units. Medications were organized separately for each resident. Narcotics were locked. All medication bottles and bubble packs were properly labeled. Centrally Stored Medication Records were reviewed and found to be complete. LPA inspected the main kitchen and found it clean. The refrigerator, freezer, and pantry cabinets were checked, and there was a sufficient supply of fresh perishable food for two (2) days and nonperishable staples for seven (7) days. No expired food items were found. Open food items were wrapped and dated. The dining rooms in Assisted Living and Memory Care was inspected and were found to be clean, with all furniture in good repair. LPA toured the outside patio area and found passageways in good condition, free of obstructions, and without any blocking or tripping hazards. The patio area had patio tables, chairs, and umbrellas for residents’ use. Delayed egress was observed on exterior exit doors. No accessible bodies of water were observed. LPA reviewed five (5) staff personnel records and five (5) resident records, and found them complete. LPA inspected the fire extinguishers mounted on the hallway walls in Assisted Living and Memory Care and found them fully charged, with the last service tag dated 01/06/2025. The Automatic sprinkler systems are tested quarterly and annually, with the last inspection completed on 03/12/2025. The smoke detectors are tested annually by a third-party vendor, Fortify Fire Protection. A staff member tested the carbon monoxide detector in the hallway in LPA’s presence, and it was found to be functional. LPA inspected the first aid kit and found it fully stocked. Emergency Drill Logs were reviewed, and it was observed that Emergency Disaster (Fire and Earthquake) Drills were conducted monthly, with the most recent drill completed on 05/15/2025. COMP III was reviewed and completed with the Executive Director. No issues were noted during the Pre-licensing inspection prior to the licensure. An exit interview was conducted with the Executive Director. A copy of this report was provided to the Executive Director, Stephanie Brice, whose signature on this form confirms receipt of the report.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 28, 2025
May 15, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file
Type of visit: Office
Facility Type: RCFE Application Type: CHOW Capacity: 97 Census (if any clients in care): COMP II Participants: STEPHANIE BRICE/ADMINISTRATOR Interview Method: Telephone interview On 5/15/25], applicant/administrator participated in COMP II. Identification of the applicant and administrator was verified through interview questions based on photo ID and other identifying personal information. During COMP II, applicant and administrator confirmed that they have read and understand community care facility licensing laws included in the Health and Safety Codes and the California Code of Regulations Title 22. Signed LIC 809 with copy of photo ID have been obtained. During COMP II, CAB analyst confirmed Applicant/Administrator’s understanding of following areas: 1. Facility operation: License type, client/resident populations, and program 2. Admission Policies 3. Staffing requirements & Training 4. Restrictive/Prohibited Health Conditions 5. General provisions 6. Emergency Preparedness 7. Complaints & Reporting 8. Pre-licensing readinessthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 15, 2025
What the state’s words mean
CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗
Who holds the licence
Transformer Opco LLC;Oakmont Management Group LLC, operates 20 licensed homes in California. Running more than one home is common and is neither good nor bad on its own.
- Ivy Park at Oakland Hills · Oakland
- Ivy Park at Woodland Hills · Woodland Hills
- Ivy Park at West Hills · West Hills
- Ivy Park at Studio City · Studio City
- Ivy Park at Palos Verdes · Torrance
- Ivy Park at Playa Vista · Playa Vista
- Ivy Park at San Marino · San Gabriel
- Ivy Park of Monterey · Monterey
- Ivy Park at Tustin · Santa Ana
- Ivy Park at La Palma · La Palma
- Ivy Park at Huntington Beach · Huntington Beach
- Ivy Park at Fullerton · Fullerton
Life here
Rooms, meals, the rhythm of a day, faith and language, pets and house rules — as the home describes them. Tap any detail for its source and date; nothing here is graded.
The home has not described daily life anywhere we have reviewed yet — that is the case for most small homes, and it says nothing about the home. These questions fill in the picture; keep the ones that matter to you.
Before you call
Ask every home the same questions — the state’s record does not answer these. Keep the ones that matter and they travel with your saved homes.
- What is included in the monthly rate, and what costs extra?
- Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?
- Which rooms does the non-ambulatory approval cover, and what transfer support is provided?
- What could change whether someone can stay here?
- Can we see a bedroom and share a meal during a visit?
Other homes nearby
The nearest licensed homes in Santa Clara County, closest first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.
Palo Alto Commons
Palo Alto · Large community · 0.0 mi away
$7,050 a month to start · Listed by the home
Bridgepoint at Los Altos
Los Altos · Large community · 0.9 mi away
$5,250 a month to start · Listed by the home
Snow White Care Home
Los Altos · Small home · 1.0 mi away
$7,500 a month to start · Listed by the home
Moldaw Family Residences at 899 Charleston
Palo Alto · Large community · 1.4 mi away
$8,500 a month to start · Listed by the home
Villa Toscana A Memory Care Community
Mountain View · Large community · 1.4 mi away
$5,900 a month to start · Covelight estimate
The Terraces at Los Altos
Los Altos · Large community · 1.6 mi away
$5,500 a month to start · Covelight estimate