Illustration — no photo of this home on file yet

Grand River Villa

Mid-size home·Licensed for 43·West Sacramento, California

Licensed since 2024Licence #576804173
  • Care approvals on fileWheelchair · Dementia · BedriddenState licensing record · September 27, 2026
  • Estimated starting rate$3,600 a monthCovelight estimate · likely $2,850–$4,750
  • Home sizeLicensed for 43Mid-size care home · a licensed care home (RCFE)
  • Room at the last state visit20 of 43 beds occupiedApril 24, 2026 · not a current opening
  • Ways to payAsk the homeMedi-Cal ALW participation not on file
  • Last state visitAugust 7, 2026CDSS inspection record

Grand River Villa is a mid-size care home in West Sacramento — a licensed residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE), the licence category behind “assisted living” and “board and care.” It is licensed for 43 residents since 2024. Hospice care is not on file.

Built from CDSS public records · September 27, 2026. Every fact below names its source and date.

Quick answers and the state record

A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

Quick answers about Grand River Villa

Is Grand River Villa licensed?

The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

How many residents is Grand River Villa licensed for?

43 residents — a mid-size home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Has Grand River Villa been cited?

0 Type A and 0 Type B citations since 2024, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. Those records count 10 state visits over the same years.

Is Grand River Villa still open?

This license was on the CDSS roster as of September 28, 2026.

What does Grand River Villa cost?

$3,600 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $2,850–$4,750. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 16 homes with 7 to 49 beds and similar homes within 10 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.

A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.

Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.

Does Grand River Villa take Medi-Cal?

On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.

Who holds the license?

The license is held by Grv A Ca Corporation;Ciminocare, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. See the homes licensed to Ciminocare — at least 6 on the state roster.

Is there a hospital nearby?

Sutter Medical Center, Sacramento is 3.2 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.

Can Grand River Villa keep a resident on hospice?

Not on file — the state’s record does not list hospice care on this license. Ask: “Can a resident stay here on hospice, and under what conditions?”

Grand River Villa license and inspection record

  • Name on the license: “GRAND RIVER VILLA”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
  • License #576804173. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • Licensed for 43 residents — a mid-size home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • Licensed to Grv A Ca Corporation;Ciminocare, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • First licensed in 2024, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • 10 state inspection visits since 2024, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • 0 Type A and 0 Type B citations on file since 2024, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. The same records count 10 state visits in that period.
  • 3 complaints and 0 substantiated allegations on file since 2024, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
  • The most recent state visit on file is August 7, 2026, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
Type A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗

See the state’s own record

Can they support the care needed?

California licenses a home for specific kinds of care. The state’s record lists what this home is approved for; the home’s own answers fill in what changes as needs change.

  • Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved · covers up to 43 residents
  • Dementia / memory careApproved by the state
  • Hospice careNot on file · ask the home
  • BedriddenApproved · covers up to 7 residents

State licensing record · September 27, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.

Read the state’s own wording
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER; APPROVED FOR CAPACITY OF 43 NON-AMBULATORY OF WHICH 7 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN

983 - RCFE / DEMENTIA

CDSS record, verbatim · September 27, 2026

As needs change

  • Two-person transfers or a lift

    Accepts residents needing a two-person transfer — reported yes

    Ask: “If two people or a lift are needed to transfer, can the person stay?”

    caring.com · 2026-09-09

  • If memory loss develops

    Dementia-care designation on file

    Ask: “Can we read the dementia care disclosure and discuss how daily support works?”

    State licensing record · September 27, 2026

3 more questions to ask the home
  • Someone awake overnight

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?”

  • Medicines

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who manages the medicines, and what happens when a dose is missed?”

  • Staying through hospice

    Hospice waiver not on file

    Ask: “If hospice is needed, can care continue here until the end?”

Care & day-to-day support

These are the home’s own statements about its day-to-day practice — they are not part of the state licensing record, and the state has not approved or reviewed them.

  • Respite / short-term stays

    Reported on aplaceformom.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Accepts residents needing a two-person transfer

    Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Medication management

    Reported on aplaceformom.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Diabetic / carbohydrate-controlled diet

    Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Incontinence care

    Reported on aplaceformom.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Low-sodium or cardiac diet available

    Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Mechanical lift (Hoyer / sit-to-stand) available

    Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

What it costs here

Covelight estimate

$3,600a month to start

Likely $2,850–$4,750

From 16 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file

Likely monthly total

$3,600a month

Likely $2,850–$4,900

With a shared room and basic help.

An estimate for planning, not a quote. The price is made in the phone call.

See the full cost breakdownRoom, care and fees · how people pay · how this estimate works
Room
Daily care
Sharing the room
  • Starting monthly rate$3,600likely $2,850–$4,750

    Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 16 homes with 7 to 49 beds and similar homes within 10 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

  • Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600

    Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (45 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).

  • One-time move-in fee$1,000this home · one time

    The home lists this one-time fee on Caring.com, seen September 9, 2026.

Likely monthly totalLikely $2,850–$4,900
$3,600
First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $3,850–$5,900
$4,600

Costs & moving in

  • Payment methodsCheck

    Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Private pay

    Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
  • Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
  • Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
  • SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
  • VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
  • Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
  • MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
If the money runs out, what Medi-Cal covers
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
  • The care level

    Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.

  • What is billed separately

    Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.

  • Move-in costs

    A one-time community fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.

  • Increases

    California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.

  • What is the full monthly cost for the room and care we need, and what does it include?
  • What would the next care level cost, and who decides when it changes?
  • What is billed separately, and is there a one-time fee or deposit at move-in?
  • Is any private-pay period required before another payment program can begin?
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 16 homes with 7 to 49 beds and similar homes within 10 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

16 homes like this within 10 miles publish starting rates mostly between $2,650–$5,100.

  • Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
  • Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
  • Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
  • Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
  • We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
  • It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Show the 16 nearby homes behind this estimate

Where it is

  • 509 Michigan Blvd, West Sacramento, CA 95691Address from the public record · September 27, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.

Opening the neighborhood map…

The state record

California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. Here are the dated documents and the state’s own words, beside what is typical for homes this size.

Since 2024, the state has filed 10 documents for this home, and its records count 10 visits since 2024. The most recent — a complaint investigation report on August 7, 2026 — closed with the state’s outcome word: “Unsubstantiated.”

On file since
2024
State visits
10
Most recent visit
August 7, 2026
Occupied · April 24, 2026 visit
20 of 43 bedsa count on that day, not an opening

We hold 3 complaint reports the state published for this home, dated April 24, 2026 to August 7, 2026. 3 of the 3 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Unsubstantiated” (3). 3 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word. Summary composed by computer from the 3 complaint reports below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

Beside homes the same size

  • Type A citations0typical 0
  • Type B citations0typical 1
  • Substantiated allegations0typical 2
  • Total complaints3typical 6

“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,354 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this licence since 2024.

Year by year
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated202634020252202024440

The last 36 months — 10 of 10 documents

20263 state visits · 4 documents
Aug 7, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not transfer resident per Care Plan leading to injury.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Nakagawa arrived unannounced at Grand River Villa on 8/7/2026 to conclude a complaint investigation and deliver findings. LPA met with Roberto Negrete, Med. Tech. Robert Godfrey, Administrator was notified by phone to discuss findings. The complaint alleges that Staff did not transfer resident per Care Plan leading to injury. Resident (R1) requires staff assistance with transferring between bed and wheelchair. Complainant alleges staff improperly transferred R1 causing injury. The Department conducted an investigation which included reviewing records and conducting interviews. Interviews of 5 of 5 staff did not identify how R1 sustained an injury. (Continued on 9099-C) Unsubstantiated (Continued from 9099-C) The Department’s review of medical records were inconclusive to determine who caused the injury to R1. LPA reviewed staff training records and found that 10 of 10 staff have proper training per Title 22 Regulations. LPA was able to interview R1 but R1 was unable to identify how injury occurred. Based on the Department's investigation unable to identify a witness to who caused injury to R1, and R1 unable to identify a staff who caused how the injury occurred, the allegation that Staff did not transfer resident (R1) per Care Plan leading to injury is unsubstantiated. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation unsubstantiated.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 7, 2026 · control 21-AS-20260219141943
Jul 29, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

On 07/29/2026, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jill Nakagawa arrived unannounced and was greeted by Regional Nurse, Allison Lopez. Administrator Robert Godfrey arrived shortly. The purpose of the visit is an Annual Inspection. There are currently 21 residents residing at the facility. There were 2 caregivers and one med tech at the time of inspection, as well as the Regional Nurse, the Administrator, Dietary Lead and Regional Maintenance Director. LPA inspected the facility's kitchen and found it clean and well organized, with an ample supply of perishable and non-perishable foods, as required per Title 22. There were also emergency supplies stored. LPA discussed an updated menu. Kitchen knives are locked in storage closet in kitchen when not in use. Residents' rooms were clean and furnished as per regulation. Bathrooms had soap and paper towels. Water temperature measured between 105 and 114 degrees F, which is within regulation. Common areas including the dining room, activities room and the Great Room were all clean and well organized. Medications were locked and stored in general office and on the medication cart. Fire extinguishers throughout the building were fully charged. The last fire drill took place on 07/28/2026 and the last fire inspection was on 06/09/2025. Carestaff do several activities over the course of the day including chair exercise, BINGO, bible study, arts and crafts. The outdoor areas were free from debris and all windows had screens. The outdoor courtyard provides seating for residents and visitors, but relies on shade trees to provide shade to the area. Three (3) resident files and five (5) staff files were reviewed and found to be complete. Facility is switching over to electronic file system. LPA requested that Administrator review training records and transcripts and organize. LPA requested an updated LIC500, proof of Liability Insurance, updated Emergency Disaster Plan, updated Infection Control Plan. No deficiencies found at the time of inspection. No citations. Exit interview conducted with Administrator Robert Godfrey.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 29, 2026
Apr 24, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff sexually abused resident. Staff does not accord resident privacy. Staff isolates resident.

On 04/24/2026, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jill Nakagawa arrived unannounced to complete the investigation regarding the above allegations and met with Regional Administrator Robert Godfrey. The Department conducted an investigation regarding the allegation Staff sexually abused resident and determined that Resident (R1) failed to disclose being raped or sexually assaulted when interviewed. The reporting party was unable to provide any information or evidence to support R1’s allegation. Interviews of two residents failed to provide information to support the allegation and/or any allegations or complaints similar in nature. Interviews with four staff, including the Administrator, failed to reveal any information or evidence to support the allegation. Continued on 9099-C Unsubstantiated Continued from 9099... According to West Sacramento Police Department, an attempt to interview R1 was initiated by the responding officer but R1’s response to questions was incoherent and rambling. Based on statements made by residents, staff, and R1, and failed investigative efforts by police to substantiate the allegation, no information or evidence was uncovered to support the allegation. The complaint alleges that Staff does not accord resident (R1) privacy. The complainant stated that R1 at times complains that they have too many visitors and is overwhelmed. LPA observed that R1 had visitors including family, church members, and health care providers. There was no record of R1 refusing the visits of staff or visitors. In addition, LPA observed on 01/26/2026 and 02/03/2026 that the door was closed during visits by staff and health care workers. Based on LPA’s observations and interviews the allegation that Staff does not accord R1 privacy is unsubstantiated. Although the allegation may have occurred there is not a preponderance of evidence to verify the allegation therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. The complaint alleges that Staff isolates resident. The complainant stated that R1 feels isolated although complainant reported that R1 has 2 volunteers, a chaplain, a social worker, Home Health Aides and an RN who visit R1 plus visits from family and friends from church. Staff also reported that R1 uses a phone in their room to make and receive calls. In addition, staff reported that R1 is taken to the dining room for meals when they request. Based on LPA’s observations on 01/26/26 and 02/03/2026, interviews with staff, home health aides and review of Visitor Sign-In Sheets the allegation that Staff isolates resident is UNSUBSTANTIATED.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 24, 2026 · control 21-AS-20260123152701
Apr 24, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility failed to safeguard residents belongings

On 04/24/2026, at approximately 3:08 PM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jill Nakagawa arrived unannounced to complete a complaint investigation and to deliver findings. LPA met with Regional Administrator Robert Godfrey. . The complaint alleges that the Facility failed to safeguard resident’s belongings. The complainant stated that they went to retrieve the chair of Resident (R1) upon their passing but was unable to recover the chair as it was missing. LPA questioned 4 facility staff regarding the chair. 4 of 4 staff stated the chair of resident R1 was at the facility, currently located in the Activities Room. Continued on 9099-C.... Unsubstantiated Continued from 9099.... Family members of R1 were asked if they had a picture of the chair but were unable to provide one, but stated “Although the chair (currently in the Activities Room) was similar to that of R1 they did not believe it to be the same. One of two family members stated the one at the facility was more orange than the brown one of R1. The second family member stated that the chair had been labeled and the chair shown had no label and was not in the same condition as the chair belonging to R1. Staff (S1) was able to provide a picture from a year ago in February of 2025. It shows staff member (S2) sitting in a chair that looks very much like the chair identified by staff as R1’s chair, in R1’s room. Although the chair looks like the same chair that is now at the facility, LPA cannot conclusively identify the chair is one in the same without a picture provided from friend or family. LPA examined the chair and found no labels discerning the chair as that of R1: staff were certain it was, but friends and family were not, and there is no record of the chair in R1’s Inventory List. Based on LPA’s conversations with individuals, both staff and family, and lack of photographic or physical evidence submitted by complainant, the allegation that the facility failed to safeguard resident’s belongings is unsubstantiated. Although the allegation may have occurred there is not a preponderance of evidence therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 24, 2026 · control 21-AS-20260227111415
20252 state visits · 2 documents
Oct 15, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Deficiencies

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Nakagawa arrived to conduct a case management visit regarding an incident report submitted to Community Care Licensing (CCL) for R1 which occurred on 10/03/2025. LPA met with Luceli Soto-Luis, the newly appointed Administrator. R1 eloped while under facility responsibility. Resident R1 has a physician's report dated 02/22/2024 diagnostic of dementia which states that resident is NOT able to leave facility unassisted at any time. Per facility staff resident R1 was found by family member of staff on sidewalk in community and returned to facility; staff were unaware that R1 had eloped. Due to this incident, immediate elopement training for staff will be held, the front gate will be repaired, new walky-talky protocols will be established. Additionally, a wander-guard system is being considered for installation. The following deficiency was observed (see LIC 809D) and cited from the California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6 of California Regulation. Failure to correct the deficiency and/or repeat deficiencies within a 12 month period may result in civil penalties. Exit interview conducted and appeal of rights provided. Appeal of Rights Given.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 15, 2025

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87464(f)(c) · Plan of correction due date: Oct 15, 2025

87464 Basic Services(f) Basic services shall at a minimum...(c) "Care and supervision" means the facility assumes...safety, personal care.:. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on incident report and staff interview Resident R1 eloped from facility without staff knowledge on 10/03/2025. This poses an immediate risk to the safety and health of residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 15, 2025

Plan of correction: Administrator agrees to conduct staff training regarding elopment by 10/16/2025 and will have plan for gate repair and wander guard to LPA by 10/17/2025.

Jul 14, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

On 07/14/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jill Nakagawa arrived unannounced and was greeted by Resident Care Coordinator Maria Ortiz, Administrator Magda Luis arrived shortly. The purpose of the visit is an Annual Inspection. There are currently 25 residents residing at the facility. There were 2 caregivers and one med tech at the time of inspection, as well as the Resident Care Coordinator, the Administrator, cook and maintenance director. LPA inspected the facility's kitchen and found it clean and well organized, with an ample supply of perishable and non-perishable foods, as required per Title 22, however Administrator will ensure that supplies listed on the menu are available whenever possible. Kitchen knives are locked in storage closet in kitchen when not in use. Residents' rooms were clean and furnished as per regulation. Bathrooms had soap and paper towels. Water temperature measured between 115.3 and 116.9 degrees F, which is within regulation. Common areas including the dining room, the activities room and the Great Room were all clean and well organized. The outdoor courtyard was currently not in use due to a crew cleaning out and disposing of contents in storage unit. Removal of refuse is due to take place on this date, 07/14/2025. A recent gardening project completed by residents was visible through the dining room windows. Medications were locked and stored in general office and on the medication cart. Proof of Liability Insurance was provided. Fire extinguishers throughout the building were last charged and tested on 11/23/2024. The last fire drill took place on 04/15/2025 and the last fire inspection was on 06/09/2025. An Activities Calendar was posted with several activities occurring over the course of the day including chair exercise, BINGO, bible study. LPA reviewed 5 resident files and 5 staff files and found them to be complete. LPA discussed the importance of in-person First Aid/CPR training. Administrator stated initial First Aid/CPR training in-person with refresher courses being completed on-line. No deficiencies cited. Exit interview conducted with Administrator, Magda Luis.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 14, 2025
20244 state visits · 4 documents
Nov 14, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Other

On 11/14/2024, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jill Nakagawa arrived unannounced and was greeted by Resident Care Coordinator Maria Ortiz. The purpose of the visit is to follow up on the plan of correction for a previous deficiency and a health & safety check. There are currently 29 residents under the facility's care. LPA inspected the facility's kitchen and found an ample supply of perishable and non-perishable foods, as required per Title 22. Licensee provided visit by dietician to help in training dietary staff. The plan of correction for deficiency cited on 11/05/2024 has been met. No deficiency cited. Exit interview conducted with Maria Ortiz, Resident Care Coordinator for Robert Godfrey, Administrator.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 14, 2024
Nov 5, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Post Licensing

On November 5, 2024, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA)Jill Nakagawa arrived unannounced to conduct a Post-Licensing inspection for Grand River Villa. LPA met with Maria Ortiz, Resident Care Coordinator. There are currently 29 residents at this Resident Care Facility for the Elderly, with an approved fire clearance for 43 non-ambulatory and 7 bedbound residents. It is a single story building with 23 rooms, an activity room, dining room, living room and enclosed backyard. There were no accessible bodies of water or firearms. The fire extinguishers were last inspected on 10/23/2024 and fully charged. LPA inspected the grounds of the facility and found them to be well-maintained. A recent fire of the storage shed in the back yard was completely cleaned up and all debris removed. No damage to facility occurred. LPA observed locked box for knives and other sharps in the storage closet in the kitchen and a container in the medication room. Kitchen was clean and well-equipped with an adequate supply of dishes and utensils. There was not an adequate supply of perishable and non-perishable foods as required per regulation(See 809-D). Bathrooms had slip mats and grab-bars for resident safety. Hand soap is supplied for handwashing. New paper towel dispensers are being installed in each resident restroom to replace other means. Water temperature was between 105 - 115 degrees F, which is within regulation. A tour of residents' bedrooms was conducted and bedrooms inspected have lighting and appropriate furnishings and linens. LPA observed the Let Us Know Complaint poster and See Something Say Something poster. Updated Emergency Disaster Plan and Administrator Certificate to be posted. Continued on 809-C Continued from 809.... Deficiencies cited from the California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6 of California Regulation. Appeal rights given. Failure to correct the deficiency and/or repeat deficiencies within a 12 month period may result in civil penalties. Exit interview was conducted with Administrative Assistant and a copy of this report was given.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 5, 2024

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87555(b)(26) · Plan of correction due date: Nov 5, 2024

87555 General Food Service Requirements (b) The following food service requirements shall apply:(26)Supplies of nonperishable foods for a minimum of one week.. perishable foods for a minimum of two days shall be maintained on the premises. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on LPA's observation Licensee failed to ensure that there were adequate perishable and non-perishable foods available for the required time frame for a minimum of 29 residents.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 5, 2024

Plan of correction: Licensee to submit proof of purchase of food by 11/07/24 to LPA to ensure adequate food supply ison site of facility.

Jul 29, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Prelicensing

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA)Jill Nakagawa arrived unannounced to conduct a Pre-Licensing inspection for Grand River Villa, previously Grand River Care Center-West. There are currently 27 residents at this Resident Care Facility for the Elderly, with an approved fire clearance for 36 non-ambulatory and 7 bedbound residents. It is a single story building with 23 rooms, an activity room, dining room, living room and enclosed backyard. There were no accessible bodies of water or firearms. The fire extinguishers were last inspected on 10/18/2023 and fully charged. LPA observed locked box for knives and other sharps in the storage closet in the kitchen and a container in the medication room. Kitchen was clean and well-equipped with an adequate supply of dishes and utensils. Two refrigerators and one freezer were clean, with an adequate supply of perishable and non-perishable foods. Bathrooms had slip mats and grab-bars for resident safety. Hand washing supplies and paper products were available in sinks used by residents. Water temperature was between 112-116 degrees F, which is within regulation. A tour of residents' bedrooms was conducted and bedrooms inspected have lighting & appropriate furnishings and linens. LPA observed the required postings including: emergency disaster plan, the Let Us Know Complaint poster and See Something Say Something poster. Continued on 809-C Continued from 809.... A sample of 3 resident and 3 employee files were reviewed and found to be complete. LPA waived the COMP 3 with ; some of Administrator as they have been with the facility for several years and has a good understanding of Title 22 regulations as well as reporting requirements. . The pre-licensing evaluation has been completed. Applicant has satisfied all requirements in accordance with Title 22, California Code of Regulations. License will be granted upon completion of a final review and approval from the Licensing Program Manager. This report will be forwarded to the Licensing Program Manager and Centralized Application Unit for continued processing. This report was signed by Administrator's representative and a copy was provided. No deficiencies were cited during today's visit.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 29, 2024
Jul 15, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Office

Facility Type: RCFE Application Type: CHOW Capacity: 43 Census (if any clients in care): 27 COMP II Participants: Diana Paz, admin; Mark Cimino, member Interview Method: Telephone interview On July 15, 2024, applicant/administrator participated in COMP II. Identification of the applicant and administrator was verified through interview questions based on photo ID and other identifying personal information. During COMP II, applicant and administrator confirmed that they have read and understand community care facility licensing laws included in the Health and Safety Codes and the California Code of Regulations Title 22. Signed LIC 809 with copy of photo ID have been obtained. During COMP II, CAB analyst confirmed Applicant/Administrator’s understanding of following areas: 1. Facility operation: License type, client/resident populations, and program 2. Medication Storage; locations of meds, fire drills 3. Transportation; filling current vacancies 4. Pre Licensing inspection readinessthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 15, 2024
What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedthere was not enough evidence to prove a violation occurred — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe evidence showed the allegation was false, could not have happened, or had no reasonable basisType A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗

An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents and the questions below stand in their place.

Life here

Rooms, meals, the rhythm of a day, faith and language, pets and house rules — as the home describes them. Tap any detail for its source and date; nothing here is graded.

Find a detail about life at this home.

Rooms & the spaces they will use

  • Shared / companion roomsReported no

    Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • LaundryDone by staff

    Reported on aplaceformom.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Wifi

    Reported on aplaceformom.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Visitor parking

    Reported on aplaceformom.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • AmenitiesGame Room · Arts and Crafts Center · Piano or Organ

    Reported on aplaceformom.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Housekeeping

    Reported on aplaceformom.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Salon or barber

    Reported on aplaceformom.com · seen September 9, 2026.

Meals, preferences & familiar food

  • Dining styleRestaurant style

    Reported on aplaceformom.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Special diets supportedNo Sugar · Low / No Sodium

    Reported on aplaceformom.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Meals are cooked in the home's own kitchen

    Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Snacks available

    Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Residents choose between options at each meal

    Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Meals served in the room

    Reported on aplaceformom.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Family may eat with the resident

    Reported on aplaceformom.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Meals provided

    Reported on aplaceformom.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Professional chef

    Reported on aplaceformom.com · seen September 9, 2026.

Activities & the rhythm of a day

  • Activity types offeredBirthday Parties · Live Musical Performances · BBQs or Picnics · Gardening Club · Happy Hour · Light Therapy Programs · and 11 more

    Birthday Parties · Live Musical Performances · BBQs or Picnics · Gardening Club · Happy Hour · Light Therapy Programs · Activities On-site · Trivia Games · Holiday Parties — reported on aplaceformom.com · seen September 9, 2026.

    Health & wellness activities/programs · Life enrichment activities/programs · Arts and crafts · Organized activities/programs · Recreational activities/programs · Seasonal, holiday, and themed events · Social Activities/Events · Tabletop & Other Games/Programs — reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Religious services at the home

    Reported on aplaceformom.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Religious services off site

    Reported on aplaceformom.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Activities coordinator on staff

    Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

Faith, culture & language

  • Languages spoken by caregiversEnglish · Spanish

    English — reported on aplaceformom.com · seen September 9, 2026.

    Spanish — reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

Pets, routines & independence

  • Residents may bring a petReported no

    Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Pet types allowedDogs · Cats

    Reported on aplaceformom.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Pet weight limit

    Reported on aplaceformom.com · seen September 9, 2026.

Visiting & staying involved

  • Transportation costs extra

    Reported on aplaceformom.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Public transit access claimed

    Reported on aplaceformom.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Transport for group outings

    Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

Before you call

Ask every home the same questions — the state’s record does not answer these. Keep the ones that matter and they travel with your saved homes.

  1. What is included in the monthly rate, and what costs extra?
  2. Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?
  3. Which rooms does the non-ambulatory approval cover, and what transfer support is provided?
  4. What could change whether someone can stay here?
  5. Can we see a bedroom and share a meal during a visit?

Other homes nearby

The nearest licensed homes in Yolo County, closest first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.

Explore Yolo County