Illustration — no photo of this home on file yet

Emerald Isle Assisted Living III

Small home·Licensed for 6·Rancho Palos Verdes, California

Licensed since 1999Licence #198202539
  • Care approvals on fileDementia · BedriddenState licensing record · September 13, 2026
  • Estimated starting rate$4,550 a monthCovelight estimate · likely $3,700–$5,600
  • Home sizeLicensed for 6Small care home · a licensed care home (RCFE)
  • Room at the last state visit5 of 6 beds occupiedMarch 14, 2024 · not a current opening
  • Ways to payAsk the homeMedi-Cal ALW participation not on file
  • Last state visitOctober 10, 2025CDSS inspection record
  • Licence holderEmerald Isle Assisted Living, Inc.Since 1999 · 2 licensed homes

Emerald Isle Assisted Living III is a small care home in Rancho Palos Verdes — a licensed residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE), the licence category behind “assisted living” and “board and care.” It is licensed for 6 residents since 1999. Wheelchair and non-ambulatory care and hospice care are not on file.

Built from CDSS public records · September 13, 2026. Every fact below names its source and date.

Quick answers and the state record

A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

Quick answers about Emerald Isle Assisted Living III

Is Emerald Isle Assisted Living III licensed?

The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

How many residents is Emerald Isle Assisted Living III licensed for?

6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

Has Emerald Isle Assisted Living III been cited?

1 Type A and 0 Type B citation since 1999, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. Those records count 9 state visits over the same years.

Is Emerald Isle Assisted Living III still open?

This license was on the CDSS roster as of September 28, 2026.

What does Emerald Isle Assisted Living III cost?

$4,550 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $3,700–$5,600. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 24 small homes within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

Among 11 other homes of a similar licensed size in Rancho Palos Verdes that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $4,625 to $5,875 a month, and the middle figure is $5,000 (n = 11 other homes publishing a starting rate).

Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.

A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.

The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.

A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.

Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.

Does Emerald Isle Assisted Living III take Medi-Cal?

On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.

Who holds the license?

The license is held by Emerald Isle Assisted Living, Inc., per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. See the homes licensed to Emerald Isle Assisted Living, Inc. — at least 2 on the state roster.

Is there a hospital nearby?

Torrance Memorial Medical Center is 3.3 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.

Can Emerald Isle Assisted Living III keep a resident on hospice?

Not on file — the state’s record does not list hospice care on this license. Ask: “Can a resident stay here on hospice, and under what conditions?”

Emerald Isle Assisted Living III license and inspection record

  • Name on the license: “EMERALD ISLE ASSISTED LIVING III”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
  • License #198202539. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • Licensed for 6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • Licensed to Emerald Isle Assisted Living, Inc., per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • First licensed in 1999, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • 9 state inspection visits since 1999, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • 1 Type A and 0 Type B citation on file since 1999, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. The same records count 9 state visits in that period.
  • 2 complaints and 0 substantiated allegations on file since 1999, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
  • The most recent state visit on file is October 10, 2025, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
Type A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗

See the state’s own record

Can they support the care needed?

California licenses a home for specific kinds of care. The state’s record lists what this home is approved for; the home’s own answers fill in what changes as needs change.

  • Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryNot on file · ask the home
  • Dementia / memory careApproved by the state
  • Hospice careNot on file · ask the home
  • BedriddenApproved by the state

State licensing record · September 13, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.

Read the state’s own wording
FACILITY LICENSED TO SERVE (6) BEDRIDDEN CLIENTS AGE 60 AND ABOVE. 87705 COMPLIANT. MAY RETAIN (5) HOSPICE CLIENT AT ANY GIVEN TIME.

983 - RCFE / DEMENTIA

CDSS record, verbatim · September 13, 2026

As needs change

  • If memory loss develops

    Dementia-care designation on file

    Ask: “Can we read the dementia care disclosure and discuss how daily support works?”

    State licensing record · September 13, 2026

4 more questions to ask the home
  • Two-person transfers or a lift

    Not on file

    Ask: “If two people or a lift are needed to transfer, can the person stay?”

  • Someone awake overnight

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?”

  • Medicines

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who manages the medicines, and what happens when a dose is missed?”

  • Staying through hospice

    Hospice waiver not on file

    Ask: “If hospice is needed, can care continue here until the end?”

What it costs here

Covelight estimate

$4,550a month to start

Likely $3,700–$5,600

From 24 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file

Likely monthly total

$4,550a month

Likely $3,700–$5,800

With a shared room and basic help.

An estimate for planning, not a quote. The price is made in the phone call.

See the full cost breakdownRoom, care and fees · how people pay · how this estimate works
Room
Daily care
Sharing the room
  • Starting monthly rate$4,550likely $3,700–$5,600

    Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 24 small homes within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

  • Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600

    Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (45 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).

  • One-time move-in fee$2,000one time · likely $0–$4,000

    Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,000 (134 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.

Likely monthly totalLikely $3,700–$5,800
$4,550
First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $4,350–$8,900
$6,550
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
  • Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
  • Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
  • SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
  • VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
  • Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
  • MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
If the money runs out, what Medi-Cal covers
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
  • The care level

    Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.

  • What is billed separately

    Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.

  • Move-in costs

    A one-time community fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.

  • Increases

    California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.

  • What is the full monthly cost for the room and care we need, and what does it include?
  • What would the next care level cost, and who decides when it changes?
  • What is billed separately, and is there a one-time fee or deposit at move-in?
  • Is any private-pay period required before another payment program can begin?
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 24 small homes within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

24 homes like this within 5 miles publish starting rates mostly between $4,000–$6,500.

  • Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
  • Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
  • Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
  • Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
  • We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
  • It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Show the 24 nearby homes behind this estimate

Where it is

  • 27781 Hawthorne Blvd, Rancho Palos Verdes, CA 90275Address from the public record · September 13, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.

Opening the neighborhood map…

The state record

California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. Here are the dated documents and the state’s own words, beside what is typical for homes this size.

Since 2021, the state has filed 9 documents for this home, and its records count 9 visits since 1999. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated October 10, 2025.

On file since
2021
State visits
9
Most recent visit
October 10, 2025
Occupied · March 14, 2024 visit
5 of 6 bedsa count on that day, not an opening

We hold 3 complaint reports the state published for this home, dated August 30, 2021 to March 14, 2024. 3 of the 3 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (1), “Unsubstantiated” (2). 3 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word. Summary composed by computer from the 3 complaint reports below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

Beside homes the same size

  • Type A citations1typical 0
  • Type B citations0typical 0
  • Substantiated allegations0typical 0
  • Total complaints2typical 0

“Typical” is the statewide median across the 6,808 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this licence since 1999.

Year by year
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated20251102024220202311020223302021221

The last 36 months — 4 of 9 documents

20251 state visit · 1 document
Oct 10, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

On 10/10/25 at around 9:20AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Mario Leon conducted an unannounced Required – 1 Year Inspection at the facility and met by staff one, Ceceni Rose - Administrator (S1) and the purpose of the visit was explained. The facility is a one-story house located in a residential area. The home consists of four (4) resident bedrooms, one (1) staff bedroom, three (3) bathrooms, a kitchen and a dining/living room area, with a backyard patio with shaded seating; including a fully gated swimming pool. The facility currently hosts five (5) residents; including four (4) residents receiving hospice care, although this facilities' license allows for one (1) resident receiving hospice. One technical violation has been cited, please see LIC9102TV. LPA toured the facility, inside and out, with staff two, Maricar "Lea" Avendano (S2). LPA observed, and questioned, no security bars or weapons on the premises. LPA toured the kitchen area and observed supplies of 7 days of nonperishable foods and 2 days perishable food for residents in care. Knives and toxins were kept in locked storage cabinet, inaccessible to residents in care and all heating sources are secured and screened. LPA observed that medications were secured and inaccessible to residents in care. All medications observed were labeled and maintained in compliance with label instructions and State and Federal law. Documents are posted as mandated, located behind the fireplace island. First aid kit is fully stocked, along with manual. Smoke and carbon monoxide detectors were in compliance and operational. There is a fire extinguisher in the kitchen, last serviced on 09/08/2025. Four (4) out of 5 bedrooms were checked. Mattresses were in good condition, adequate lighting, plenty of dresser and closet space observed. Walls and floors were clean and in good condition. LPA observed cobwebs in bedroom one's (BR1) lamp. LPA observed two light switches needing minor repair, yet are still in working order. Comforters, bed linen, bath towels and mattress protectors were adequately stocked. Bathroom toilets and water faucets worked properly, grab bars were secure, and non-skid mats were in place. Adequate lighting and toiletries are accessible to residents in care. The report continues, please see LIC809C. LPA tested hot water temperature and the average temperature was calculated at 106.1°F (degrees Fahrenheit) throughout the facility. This facility provides residents with hygiene products such as feminine napkins, non-medicated soap, toilet paper, toothbrush, toothpaste, and comb. During today's visit, there have been zero (0) deficiencies cited. There has been one (1) technical assistance note provided, please see LIC9102TA. There has been one (1) technical violation note provided, please see LIC9102TV. An exit interview was held with staff one, Ceceni Rose - Administrator (S1), and a copy of this report and LIC9102TA and LIC9102TV have been provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 10, 2025

The state marks this report as 5 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 3. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.

20242 state visits · 2 documents
Sep 14, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

This document is amended to update the number of approved bedridden residents. On 09/14/2024 at around 9:40 AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Leandro conducted an unannounced Required – 1 Year Inspection to the above-named facility and met with Licensee Assistant Cecenirose Pare. LPA explained the purpose of the visit and was accompanied by staff inside and outside the facility during this inspection. This facility is licensed to serve 6 bedridden residents ages 60 and above. Complaint with 87705 - Care of Persons with Dementia. Approved for 1 Hospice resident at any given time. There are a total of 5 residents residing in this facility. There are a total of 2 hospice residents residing in this facility. There are a total of 1 bedridden resident in this facility. The facility is a one-story house located in a residential street. The home consists of 4 resident bedrooms, 1 staff bedroom, 3 bathrooms, 1 kitchen, 1 dining/living room area, 1 backyard swimming pool, 1 attached garage,1 backyard patio area with shaded seating. The patio furniture is under a shaded area and accessible to residents. There are no security bars or weapons on the premises. There is construction currently happening in the facility. LPA toured the kitchen area and observed supplies of nonperishable foods for a minimum of one week and fresh perishable foods for a minimum of two days. Knives and toxins were kept in locked storage cabinet. LPA observed that medications were safe, locked, and inaccessible. All medications observed were labeled and maintained in compliance with label instructions and State and Federal law. Documents are posted as mandated. First aid kit is fully stocked with manual. Smoke and carbon monoxide detectors were in compliance and operational. There is a fire extinguisher in the kitchen and it was last serviced on 09/05/2024. 5 out of 5 bedrooms were checked. Mattresses were in good condition, adequate lighting, plenty of dresser and closet space observed. Walls and floors were clean and in good condition. Comforters, bed linen, bath towels and mattress protectors were adequately stocked. Bathroom toilets and water faucets worked properly, grab bars were secure, and a non-skid mat was in place. Adequate lighting and toiletries accessible to residents. LPA tested hot water temperature and it measured between 105 and 120 degrees Fahrenheit. This facility provides residents with hygiene products such as feminine napkins, nonmedicated soap, toilet paper, toothbrush, toothpaste, and comb. 5 staff records were reviewed, 3 out of 5 staff records had required documentation. 2 out 5 staff files were incomplete. 5 resident records were reviewed and, 5 out of 5 resident records had required documentation. A technical assistance is being issued for: videoconferencing devices dedicated for client use, maintaining complete files in the facility, and facility construction or alterations. LPA explained to Licensee Assistant to contact their designated LPA Leon and inform them of their construction plan. Email: Mario.Leon@dss.ca.gov Deficiencies are being cited based on LPA observation, record review and interviews conducted in accordance with the California Code of Regulations, Title 22. Violation regarding: Hospice Waiver, Fire Clearance for Bedridden Residents, and Complete & Current Medication Administration Records (MAR). An exit interview was conducted, Plans of Corrections were reviewed and developed. A copy of this report and appeal rights were discussed and left with the Licensee Assistant.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 14, 2024
Mar 14, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Resident sustained a fracture while in care Resident sustained multiple falls while in care Staff did not properly report an incident involving a resident Staff did not follow a resident's needs and care plans Facility has inadequate record keeping

On (03/14/2024), Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jose Calderon conducted an unannounced subsequent visit to Emerald Isle Assisted Living III. LPA conducted a risk assessment prior to entering the facility. LPA was greeted by Administrator (A1) Laura Martz and LPA explained the purpose for today’s visit is to investigate the above-mentioned allegations and deliver the findings. The investigation consisted of the following: An initial visit was conducted on 11/01/21 around 09:00AM by LPA Calderon with Administrator Martz for health & safety purposes of residents in care. During this visit, LPA conducted a physical plant tour which included five (5) bedrooms, two (2) bathrooms, plus all common areas that included the kitchen, dining room, and living room. LPA observed two (2) cameras in the dining room and living room areas. LPA Calderon requested a copy of Resident #1’s file, facility staff and residents’ rosters, staff training records, incident report (dated 10/19/21), Administrator file, facility’s plan of operation, and video footage of incident (dated 10/19/21). The complaint investigation was referred to the California Department of Social Services Investigation Branch and was assigned to Investigator Christine Ferris which included a review of medical records (dated 10/19/21 – 10/22/21) from Torrance Memorial Medical Center; interviews of former and current facility staff, residents in care, and witnesses; observation of facility’s video recording (between 16:39:07 hours – 16:41:32 hours). Unsubstantiated LPA Calderon conducted a subsequent visit on 05/22/23 at 08:45AM and was greeted by Staff #1 (S1: Sarah Reyes, Caregiver). During this visit, LPA Calderon toured the facility to include all common areas. LPA interviewed staff (S1-S3) and witnesses (W1-W6) and attempted interviews with residents (R2-R4). During this investigation, LPA Calderon interviewed Residents (R1-R3), Administrator (A1), and Staff (S1-S3). LPA Calderon obtained and reviewed the following documents: Appraisal/Needs and Services Plan (dated 12/14/19), Physician’s Report (dated 12/14/19), Admission Agreement (dated 12/14/19), video footage (dated 12/20/20), hospital records (dated 11/05/21), photographs of Resident #1 (dated 10/19/21). LPA also reviewed the Department’s Investigation Branch (IB) report from Investigator Chrisine Ferris. The investigation revealed the following: Allegation #1: Resident sustained a fracture while in care. This complaint alleged that resident sustained a fracture while in care from a fall. Resident #1 was admitted to Torrance Memorial Medical Center on 10/19/21 due to a fall observed (via) facility’s video recording. On 04/30/22, further review of R1’s medical records documented that the resident was experiencing health issues and x-rays done for the resident did not suggest any fracture was found. During the investigation, there were no reports of neglect or lack of supervision. On 01/10/23, LPA Calderon interviewed Administrator Martz. The administrator’s written statement (dated 11/01/2021) stated that Resident #1 sustained an unwitnessed fall based on the facility’s video recording. Administrator stated that R1 was sitting in a recliner chair, stood up, lost their balance, and fell to the floor. Staff #1 rushed to R1’s aid and assisted the resident off the living room floor. The Department’s Investigation Branch, Investigator Chrisine Ferris, found there was no evidence to corroborate the above-mentioned allegation. The information and evidence obtained did not sufficiently support the allegation. Allegation #2: Resident sustained multiple falls while in care. This complaint alleged that resident sustained multiple falls while in care. Resident #1 did not have 1:1 care and reportedly did not have a significant history of falls. On 10/19/21, the caregivers on duty at the time of R1’s fall were preparing dinner within (approximately) 40 feet of where R1 was sitting prior to the fall. The facility’s video recording captured R1’s fall and the caregivers’ response time to be within an appropriate timeframe and providing the medical assistance including calling 9-1-1. Resident #1 was taken to Torrance Memorial Medical Center for a right fracture of the hip. Medical report does support a non-displaced fracture of the right femoral neck. A review of the hospital medical records on 04/30/22 does not support multiple falls while in care. On 01/10/23, LPA Calderon reviewed a written statement (dated 11/1/2021) from A1. The administrator stated that Resident #1 did not sustain multiple falls while in care; and that facility staff provided care to R1 after the fall happened on 10/19/21. On 10/29/22, LPA Calderon reviewed the video recording which suggested that R1 was in recliner chair, stood up, lost their balance, and fell to the floor. The video suggested that Staff #1 assisted R1 within seconds of R1 falling from the recliner chair. On 05/22/23, LPA Calderon interviewed staff (S1-S3). Staff #1 stated that if a resident fell, all staff would aid the resident’s medical needs. Staff #2 stated that it is rare for a resident to fall; but, if this does happen, facility staff will provide medical aid including calling 9-1-1 or taking a resident to the hospital, if needed. 2 of staff interviewed by IB Investigator Ferris denied R1 sustaining multiple falls in care. IB investigator conducted a review of R1 file and did not observe any documentation that R1 sustained multiple falls while in care. The Department’s Investigation Branch, Investigator Chrisine Ferris, found there was no evidence to corroborate the above-mentioned allegation. The information and evidence obtained did not sufficiently support the allegation. Allegation #3: Staff did not properly report incident involving resident.This complaint alleged that staff did not properly report an incident involving a resident. On 10/29/22, LPA Calderon interviewed A1. A1 states that R1 lost balance and fell to the floor. A1 states that staff reported the fall to A1 and then called R1 family to advise of the fall. A1 states that A1 filed an incident report and reported the loss to DSS as required. A1 states that there was video of the fall and A1 allowed R1 family to view the video for transparency. On 10/29/22, LPA Calderon reviewed A1 written statement for complaint. A1 provided a copy of A1 written statement to R1 family for their review. On 05/22/22, LPA Calderon interviewed staff (S1-S3) for complaints. 3 of 3 staff interviewed denied the allegation and all stated they report incidents. On 05/23/23, LPA Calderon attempted to interview residents (R2-R4) for complaint. Residents could not answer any questions regarding the complaint allegation due to communication barriers. LPA Calderon conducted a file review and noted the Administrator submitted an incident report to Community Care Licensing. Allegation #4: Staff did not follow a resident needs and care plan. This complaint alleged that staff did not follow a resident needs and care plan. On 10/29/22, LPA Calderon interviewed A1. A1 states that staff take care of residents’ needs. A1 states that prior to entering A1 facility all residents must have a needs and service plan. A1 states that all staff must review and follow all resident needs and service plan. A1 states that all staff reviewed R1 needs and Service plan while in their care. On 10/29/22, LPA Calderon reviewed R1 needs and service plan R1 needs, and service plan suggest R1 has balance issues and health issues. On 10/25/22, LPA Calderon received and reviewed the department’s Investigation Branch (IB) Investigator name report. The investigator’s report states: The investigator spoke to staff and all staff followed R1 needs and service plan for R1 care. On 05/22/23, LPA Calderon interviewed staff (S1-S3). 3 of 3 staff denied the allegation. S1 states that S1 is required to review all residents needs and service plan prior to providing care. S1 states that S1 cannot provide the best care possible without knowing what the medical needs for R1 are. S2 states that S2 reviews all medical reports to include the needs and service plan for each resident. S2 states that S2 provides great service by understanding what the medical issues are for each resident. S3 states that the needs and service plan is required reading for each resident. S3 states that S3 provides better care by understanding what each residents’ needs are. On 05/22/23, LPA Calderon attempted to interview residents (R2-R4) for complaint. Due to communication barriers residents could not answer any questions regarding the complaint. LPA conducted a review of R1 Care plan and did not note any discrepancies between the care staff stated they provide. 03/13/24 Allegation #5: Facility has inadequate record keeping. This complaint alleged that the facility has inadequate record keeping. On 10/29/22, LPA Calderon interviewed A1. A1 states that A1 staff keep adequate records on all care provided to residents in A1 care. A1 states that accurate records are kept for R1 to include all medical records and incident reports. A1 states that A1 staff are mandated to keep accurate records on all residents and that all resident’s family can obtain and review all records for their family member. On 10/29/2022 LPA Calderon reviewed the incident report (dated 10/19/2021). Incident Report stated that R1 was sitting in a recliner chair, lost their balance and fell to the floor. Staff called 9-1-1 and R1’s family to advise of the resident’s fall. On 10/29/22, LPA Calderon reviewed the facility’s video recording of R1’s fall. Facility took a video of the living room area. Video recording shows R1 sitting in a recliner chair. The video recording showed R1 trying to get out of their recliner chair, lost their balance, fell to the floor, and within seconds, facility staff came to R1’s aid. The administrator stated that A1 supplied a copy of video recording to R1’s family. The administrator stated that all facility staff follow and keep accurate records and staff take continuous training in record keeping. The administrator stated that all emails are kept and tracked for resident records. On 05/22/23, LPA Calderon interviewed staff (S1-S3). 3 of 3 staff denied the allegation. Staff #1 stated that they are trained to keep records for all resident’s care. Staff #2 stated that they are mandated to keep accurate records for each resident in S2’s care. Staff #33 states that A1 trains all staff to keep records of all care provided by staff to include any hospice records or hospital records. Staff #3 stated that these records can be reviewed by the resident’s family and the records must be accurate. On 05/22/23, LPA Calderon attempted to interview residents (R2-R4) for complaint. Due to health issues, R2-R4 could not answer questions regarding the complaint. Based on the evidence gathered and interviews conducted and records reviewed, although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur; therefore, the allegations: “resident sustained a fracture while in care” “resident sustained multiple falls while in care” “staff did not properly report an incident involving a resident” “staff did not follow a residents needs and care plan” “ facility has inadequate record keeping” are UNSUBSTANTIATED. A face-to-face interview was conducted with Administrator Laura Martz and a hard copy of the Complaint Report was provided by hand for facility records.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 14, 2024 · control 11-AS-20211029141335
20231 state visit · 1 document
Nov 11, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

On 11/11/2023 at 9:03 am Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) David España conducted an unannounced Required-1-year annual visit. Upon arrival at the facility, LPA España conducted a risk assessment at the front door. Based on the assessment, the facility is clear of Covid-19 infection (No COVID-19 cases). LPA verified that the facility has an approved mitigation plan report. LPA was granted access and allowed to enter the facility to conduct the inspection. LPA was met by Sarah Maria Reyes, caregiver and the purpose of today’s visit was explained. During the visit, LPA observed the facility infection control practices. There are currently three (3) residents in the facility. There are three (3) residents are non-ambulatory, and (2) bedridden. The facility is a single-story structure located in a residential neighborhood. The Residential Care Facilities for the Elderly (RCFE) is licensed to serve (6) bedridden clients age 60 and above, may retain (1) hospice client at any given time. The facility consists of five (5) bedrooms, two (2) full bathrooms, shaded back yard, front yard, pool with gate, laundry room and a detached two (2) car garage. LPA and Sarah Maria Reyes toured the entire facility inside and out. Documents are posted as mandated. Bedrooms 1, 2 and 3 are occupied by residents and contain the mandated furniture. Bedroom 7 is a staff bedroom. The three and half (3 1/2) bathrooms have grab bars and non-skid mats and are clean and operational. First aid kit is fully stocked with manual; smoke detectors and carbon monoxide detectors were in compliance and operational. No firearms are stored at facility and body of water present (pool with gate.) Medications are stored, locked and inaccessible to residents. Resident files along with medications are current. Staff files are current. Ample supply of perishable and nonperishable food, hot water temperature is (116.6) degrees Fahrenheit, linens and personal hygiene supplies are adequate, hazardous toxins and/or sharp items are inaccessible to residents, (1) fire extinguisher is fully charged. Exit, walkways and/or passageways, front and back yard are free of debris and/or hazards. The facility is in good repair. LPA observed a sanitizing station at the facility entry & visitors and temperatures are logged and checked, sanitizer/soap, paper towels, in all the bathrooms and additional sanitation supplies are stored in the garage. Emergency contacts updated and posted; PPE's are enough for 30 days. According to the California Code of Regulations (Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8), LPA did not observe any deficiencies, therefore no citations were issued at this time. Technical Advisory (TA) issued. Resident Rights/Information - Technical Violation: 87468(c)(2)(A) An exit interview conducted with Cecenirose Pare, Caregiver and a hard copy of report was providedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 11, 2023

The state marks this report as 3 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 2. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedthere was not enough evidence to prove a violation occurred — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe evidence showed the allegation was false, could not have happened, or had no reasonable basisType A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗

An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents and the questions below stand in their place.

Who holds the licence

Emerald Isle Assisted Living, Inc., licensed since 1999, operates 2 licensed homes in California. Running more than one home is common and is neither good nor bad on its own.

Life here

Rooms, meals, the rhythm of a day, faith and language, pets and house rules — as the home describes them. Tap any detail for its source and date; nothing here is graded.

The home has not described daily life anywhere we have reviewed yet — that is the case for most small homes, and it says nothing about the home. These questions fill in the picture; keep the ones that matter to you.

Before you call

Ask every home the same questions — the state’s record does not answer these. Keep the ones that matter and they travel with your saved homes.

  1. What is included in the monthly rate, and what costs extra?
  2. Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?
  3. Can we read the dementia care disclosure and discuss how daily support works?
  4. What could change whether someone can stay here?
  5. Can we see a bedroom and share a meal during a visit?

Other homes nearby

The nearest licensed homes in Los Angeles County, closest first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.

Explore Los Angeles County