Illustration — no photo of this home on file yet

Casa Del Sol II Residence

Small home·Licensed for 6·Culver City, California

Licensed since 2017Licence #198602191
  • Care approvals on fileWheelchairState licensing record · September 13, 2026
  • Estimated starting rate$5,500 a monthCovelight estimate · likely $4,500–$6,750
  • Home sizeLicensed for 6Small care home · a licensed care home (RCFE)
  • Room at the last state visit1 of 6 beds occupiedJanuary 22, 2025 · not a current opening
  • Ways to payAsk the homeMedi-Cal ALW participation not on file
  • Last state visitSeptember 25, 2025CDSS inspection record
  • Licence holderLa Casa Vista LLCSince 2017 · 2 licensed homes

Casa Del Sol II Residence is a small care home in Culver City — a licensed residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE), the licence category behind “assisted living” and “board and care.” It is licensed for 6 residents since 2017. Dementia care, hospice care and bedridden care are not on file.

Built from CDSS public records · September 13, 2026. Every fact below names its source and date.

Quick answers and the state record

A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

Quick answers about Casa Del Sol II Residence

Is Casa Del Sol II Residence licensed?

The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

How many residents is Casa Del Sol II Residence licensed for?

6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

Has Casa Del Sol II Residence been cited?

0 Type A and 0 Type B citations since 2017, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. Those records count 5 state visits over the same years.

Is Casa Del Sol II Residence still open?

This license was on the CDSS roster as of September 28, 2026.

What does Casa Del Sol II Residence cost?

$5,500 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $4,500–$6,750. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 12 small homes and similar homes within 10 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

Among 228 other homes of a similar licensed size across Los Angeles County that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $4,000 to $6,300 a month, and the middle figure is $5,000 (n = 228 other homes publishing a starting rate).

Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.

A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.

The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.

A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.

Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.

Does Casa Del Sol II Residence take Medi-Cal?

On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.

Who holds the license?

The license is held by La Casa Vista LLC, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. See the homes licensed to La Casa Vista LLC — at least 2 on the state roster.

Is there a hospital nearby?

Southern California Hospital at Culver City is 1.9 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.

Can Casa Del Sol II Residence keep a resident on hospice?

Not on file — the state’s record does not list hospice care on this license. Ask: “Can a resident stay here on hospice, and under what conditions?”

Casa Del Sol II Residence license and inspection record

  • Name on the license: “CASA DEL SOL II RESIDENCE”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
  • License #198602191. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • Licensed for 6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • Licensed to La Casa Vista LLC, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • First licensed in 2017, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • 5 state inspection visits since 2017, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • 0 Type A and 0 Type B citations on file since 2017, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. The same records count 5 state visits in that period.
  • 1 complaint and 0 substantiated allegations on file since 2017, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
  • The most recent state visit on file is September 25, 2025, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
Type A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗

See the state’s own record

Can they support the care needed?

California licenses a home for specific kinds of care. The state’s record lists what this home is approved for; the home’s own answers fill in what changes as needs change.

  • Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved · covers up to 2 residents
  • Dementia / memory careNot on file · ask the home
  • Hospice careNot on file · ask the home
  • BedriddenNot on file · ask the home

State licensing record · September 13, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.

Read the state’s own wording
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 2 AMBULATORY AND 4 NON-AMBULATORY. ROOM #3 APPROVED FOR 2 NON-AMBULATORY, ROOMS #1 AND #2 APPROVED FOR 1 NON-AMBULATORY FOR EACH ROOM.

945 - ADULTS / ELDERLY

CDSS record, verbatim · September 13, 2026

As needs change

5 questions to ask the home — nothing on file yet
  • Two-person transfers or a lift

    Not on file

    Ask: “If two people or a lift are needed to transfer, can the person stay?”

  • Someone awake overnight

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?”

  • Medicines

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who manages the medicines, and what happens when a dose is missed?”

  • Staying through hospice

    Hospice waiver not on file

    Ask: “If hospice is needed, can care continue here until the end?”

  • If memory loss develops

    Dementia-care designation not on file

    Ask: “If memory loss develops, what would change — and when would a move be needed?”

What it costs here

Covelight estimate

$5,500a month to start

Likely $4,500–$6,750

From 12 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file

Likely monthly total

$5,500a month

Likely $4,500–$6,900

With a shared room and basic help.

An estimate for planning, not a quote. The price is made in the phone call.

See the full cost breakdownRoom, care and fees · how people pay · how this estimate works
Room
Daily care
Sharing the room

Memory care is not priced here: a dementia-care designation is not on file for this home. Ask the home.

  • Starting monthly rate$5,500likely $4,500–$6,750

    Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 12 small homes and similar homes within 10 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

  • Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600

    Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (45 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).

  • One-time move-in fee$2,000one time · likely $0–$4,000

    Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,000 (134 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.

Likely monthly totalLikely $4,500–$6,900
$5,500
First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $5,250–$9,950
$7,500
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
  • Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
  • Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
  • SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
  • VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
  • Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
  • MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
If the money runs out, what Medi-Cal covers
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
  • The care level

    Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.

  • What is billed separately

    Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.

  • Move-in costs

    A one-time community fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.

  • Increases

    California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.

  • What is the full monthly cost for the room and care we need, and what does it include?
  • What would the next care level cost, and who decides when it changes?
  • What is billed separately, and is there a one-time fee or deposit at move-in?
  • Is any private-pay period required before another payment program can begin?
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 12 small homes and similar homes within 10 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

12 homes like this within 10 miles publish starting rates mostly between $4,950–$9,000.

  • Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
  • Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
  • Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
  • Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
  • We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
  • It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Show the 12 nearby homes behind this estimate

Where it is

  • 11600 W Washington Blvd, Culver City, CA 90066Address from the public record · September 13, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.

Opening the neighborhood map…

The state record

California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. Here are the dated documents and the state’s own words, beside what is typical for homes this size.

Since 2021, the state has filed 5 documents for this home, and its records count 5 visits since 2017. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated September 25, 2025.

On file since
2021
State visits
5
Most recent visit
September 25, 2025
Occupied · January 22, 2025 visit
1 of 6 bedsa count on that day, not an opening

We hold 1 complaint report the state published for this home, dated January 22, 2025. 1 of the 1 carries the state's recorded outcome word: “Unsubstantiated” (1). 1 includes the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word. Summary composed by computer from the 1 complaint report below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

Beside homes the same size

  • Type A citations0typical 0
  • Type B citations0typical 0
  • Substantiated allegations0typical 0
  • Total complaints1typical 0

“Typical” is the statewide median across the 6,808 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this licence since 2017.

Year by year
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated2025220202411020231102021110

The last 36 months — 3 of 5 documents

20252 state visits · 2 documents
Sep 25, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Bernadette Allen conducted an unannounced visit to conduct an annual inspection. LPA introduced herself and met with Vida Zelaya-LVN who was informed of the purpose of the visit. The facility is a two-story building located in a residential-commercial neighborhood with, a dining room, 3 bedrooms, 3 bathrooms, and an indoor/outdoor activity area. Age range 60 and over. 2 Ambulatory and 4 non-ambulatory, Room #3 approved for 2 Non-Ambulatory, Rooms #1 and #2 approved for 1 Non-Ambulatory for each room. The facility does not handle any of the residents’ finances. At 11:45 AM, LPA reviewed four (4) residents files for admission agreements, updated physician reports, needs and services plans all of which appeared to be all current. LPA also reviewed four (4) staff files for First Aid/CPR certification, criminal record clearance, trainings, and health screenings which were all current. At 12:15 PM, LPA and Silvia Figueroa- Support staff toured the physical plant. There were no bodies of water or obstructions on the premises. LPA observed that the bedrooms have the required furniture which appeared to be in good repair. The rooms also have adequate lighting, and storage for the residents’ personal belongings. LPA inspected a total of seven (7) bedrooms and seven (7) bathrooms that were found to be clean and operational. At 3:15 PM, LPA toured the kitchen and dining area and there was sufficient seating for dining. There was a menu available for review. LPA observed a 5-day supply of perishables and a 7-day supply of non-perishable food available for the residents in care which was adequately maintained. LPA observed fully charge fire extinguishers throughout the facility and last inspected on 8/16/2025. The smoke and carbon monoxide detectors were in operable condition. The water temperature ranged from 115.5°F to 116.2°F, and the temperature throughout the facility ranged from 74°F to 78°F. During the visit, LPA observed that the facility was clean, sanitary, and appropriately furnished. LPA also observed cleaning supplies, toxins, and sharp objects were stored inaccessible to residents in care. Based on the observations made during today’s visit, no deficiencies were cited. An exit interview was conducted, and this report was discussed and provided to Vida Zelaya-LVN at the conclusion of the visit with appeal rights.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 25, 2025
Jan 22, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff made inappropriate comments towards resident. Staff are not treating resident with respect.

On January 22,2025, an associate from the California Department of Social Services/Community Care Licensing (CDSS/CCL) conducted an initial unannounced complaint visit. The Medicaton Nurse, Vida Zelaya, greeted the associate. The associate explained that the purpose of this visit was to investigate the allegations mentioned above. The investigation included a tour of the facility, interviews, and the collection of records. Interviews were conducted with staff members #1, #2 (S1-S2) and residents members #2 through #5 (R2-R5). The associate reviewed several documents, including the Personnel Schedule Sheet (dated 01/01/25), the Facility Roster (dated 0916/24), and Resident #1 (R1's) service records and other records associated with this complaint. (Evaluation Report continues LIC 9099-C) Unsubstantiated INVESTIGATION REVEALED THE FOLLOWING: Allegation #1: Staff made inappropriate comments towards resident. Allegation #2: Staff are not treating resident with respect. The complaint stated that the facility staff made inappropriate comments towards Resident #1 (R1) and did not treat (R1) with respect. It specifically noted that Staff #1 and Staff #2 (S1-S2) made unkind and rude remarks and failed to show respect towards (R1). The complaint mentioned that (R1) was temporarily relocated to this facility due to the Eaton fire disaster and no further details were provided regarding these allegations. On January 22, 2025, between 10:30 AM and 12:00 PM, the Department interviewed Staff #1 and Staff #2 regarding the allegations that they had made inappropriate comments and treated (R1) disrespectfully. (S1) and (S2) denied making impolite comments or suggesting any mistreatment of (R1). (S1) explained that (R1) had been relocated to this facility during the Eaton Fire in Pasadena, which occurred from January 9 to January 14, 2025, along with three other residents identified as Resident #2, #3, and #4 (R2-R4). According to (S1), (R1) is diagnosed with a mental health disorder but is independent and capable of completing all activities of daily living. (R1) only requires supervision and medication management. It was noted on (R1’s) Medication Administration Record that (R1) had refused to take prescribed medication for multiple days upon being transferred to Casa Del Sol II Residence. A single missed of medication can affect mood or behavior, potentially causing feelings of anger, agitation, or depression (reference: National Institute of Health). (S1) reported that (R1) was reluctant to cooperate with the assistance provided by care staff members, and the activities were documented in (R1’s) progress communication notes. On January 22, 2025, between 10:30 AM and 12:00 PM, the Department interviewed witnesses, identified as Witness # 1 and Witness #2. They could not corroborate the allegations in question. (W1), the facility administrator, and (W2), a med-tech at Pasadena Adult Living Center, confirmed that they faced challenges in providing services to Resident #1 (R1). They noted that the actions of the care staff were often misinterpreted as unruly or discourteous, particularly when dealing with (R1), who only needed redirection. (Evaluation Report continues LIC 9099-C) (W1) reported that Residents #2, #3, and #4 (R2-R4) had positive feedback about the staff and their experiences at Casa Del Sol II Residence. (W2) added that (R1) frequently refused medications, which often led to (R1) exhibiting derogatory behaviors. On January 22, 2025, between 11:30 AM and 12:30 PM, the Department interviewed resident members identified as R2, R3, R4, and R5 regarding the allegations. (R2-R5) were unable to validate the accusations. They described their experiences with the staff as positive, respectful, and professional, stating that they had not witnessed any verbal or physical mistreatment that would infringe upon the residents' rights. An interview with Resident #1 (R1) was not possible as calls went unanswered. The Department reviewed several documents regarding Resident #1 (R1). These included the physician's report (dated February 1, 2024); the Appraisal/Need and Service Plan (dated January 10, 2025); Facility Progress Notes (dated from January 10 to January 15, 2025); the Nurse's Admission Record (dated January 10, 2025); Identification and Emergency Information (dated April 21, 2022); the Self-Administration of Medication Assessment Record (dated January 10, 2025); and the Medication Administration Record covering (dated December 15, 2024, to January 13, 2025). The review verified that (R1) is diagnosed with a mental illness, has refused to take medication for (23) consecutive days, and exhibits deprecating behaviors. Based on the gathered information, there is insufficient evidence to support the stated allegations. Based on the information collected from the facility inspection, observations, interviews, and records analysis, the Department found no evidence to support the above allegations. While the allegations may be valid or have occurred, there is insufficient evidence to establish whether the alleged violations took place or did not. Therefore, the allegations are deemed unsubstantiated. An exit interview was conducted with Veda Zelaya, and copies of the reports were provided. This report serves as an amendment to clarify the findings. It does not supersede the complaint investigation findings reflected in the report created 01/22/25.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 22, 2025 · control 11-AS-20250114112502
20241 state visit · 1 document
Sep 11, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Pamela Bunker conducted an unannounced required 1- year visit with the primary focus on Infection Control measures and using the new CARE Inspection Tool. Upon arrival at the facility, LPA Bunker conducted a risk assessment. Based on the assessment, the facility is clear of COVID-19 infection. LPA was properly screened for COVID-19 symptoms and temperature was checked. LPA Bunker met staff member LVN Vida Zelaya and explained the purpose of today's Annual Inspection. LPA verified that the facility has an approved mitigation plan report. There are currently five (5), residents in placement. The facility's annual fees are current. Staff member Ms. Vida and LPA Bunker toured the facility. The facility is a two-story building located in a residential-commercial neighborhood with, a dining room, 3 bedrooms, 3 bathrooms, and an indoor/outdoor activity area. Bedrooms #1-3 are designated as the client's bedrooms. The residents' bedrooms had the required furniture, bed linens, and closet/drawer space to accommodate them comfortably. Resident bathrooms were checked. The toilets and water faucets worked properly, the grab bars were secure, the shower was free of mold/mildew and a non-skid mat was in place. Resident bath towels, toiletries, and personal hygiene supplies were adequately stocked. Common areas were clean and clear of hazards; doorways were free of obstructions. Food and meals are prepared in the main kitchen located in the skilled nursing facility and are brought to the residents on carts. All cleaning solutions, hazardous items, and medications were securely locked and inaccessible to residents. Smoke detectors were working properly, and the fire extinguisher was fully charged. During the visit, LPA observed the facility's infection control practices. LPA observed a screening station with sanitizer at the facility entrance and additional sanitation supplies in the nursing office that were inaccessible to the residents. LPA observed a sign-in sheet and temperature log for visitors. LPA's temperature was checked during the visit. LPA observed staff wearing masks. Each resident has their own individual room for isolation and required postings are throughout the facility. Due to time constraints, LPA was unable to complete the visit and will return back at a later date to complete the visit.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 11, 2024
What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedthere was not enough evidence to prove a violation occurred — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe evidence showed the allegation was false, could not have happened, or had no reasonable basisType A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗

An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents and the questions below stand in their place.

Who holds the licence

La Casa Vista LLC, licensed since 2017, operates 2 licensed homes in California. Running more than one home is common and is neither good nor bad on its own.

Life here

Rooms, meals, the rhythm of a day, faith and language, pets and house rules — as the home describes them. Tap any detail for its source and date; nothing here is graded.

The home has not described daily life anywhere we have reviewed yet — that is the case for most small homes, and it says nothing about the home. These questions fill in the picture; keep the ones that matter to you.

Before you call

Ask every home the same questions — the state’s record does not answer these. Keep the ones that matter and they travel with your saved homes.

  1. What is included in the monthly rate, and what costs extra?
  2. Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?
  3. Which rooms does the non-ambulatory approval cover, and what transfer support is provided?
  4. What could change whether someone can stay here?
  5. Can we see a bedroom and share a meal during a visit?

Other homes nearby

The nearest licensed homes in Los Angeles County, closest first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.

Explore Los Angeles County