Serene Meadow Homes

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

On 08/03/26 at 1:15 pm Licensing Program Analysts (LPA) J. Clancy-Czuleger arrived unannounced to do an annual inspection. LPA meet with Administrator Shirley Reddy and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA inspected the facility inside out. There is no body of water. Physical plant is consistent with the facility sketch received by Central Application Bureau (CAB) and approved by the fire department. LPA inspected the living room, dining area, kitchen, bedrooms, hallways, bathrooms, side and backyards. Bedrooms were observed appropriately furnished with adequate lighting and drawers. Facility has sufficient towels, extra bed sheets and comforters. Equipment and supplies for residents' personal hygiene are available and on site. Dinner and silver wares were observed sufficient for residents' use. Food supplies checked and observed good for seven days of non-perishables. Facility was observed equipped with refrigerator, microwave, dishwasher, washer and dryer. Cabinet for knives, cleaning supplies, and central storage for medications were observed with locks. Activity supplies were available. Outdoor activity space was observed furnished with tables, chairs and shade. The facility has a mitigation plan. Fire extinguishers were observed fully charge and tags showed serviced 06/12/2026. At 1:40 pm LPA reviewed 5 residents records. At 2:05 pm, LPA reviewed 2 staff records and 2 of 2 were fingerprint cleared and associated to the facility. No deficiencies cited during visit. Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 3, 2026

Allegation investigated: Staff are not providing activities for residents to do together

On 02/25/2026 at 1:00 PM, Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) J. Clancy-Czuleger arrived unannounced to deliver findings for the above allegations. LPA explained the purpose of the visit with Administrator Suresh Reddy. On the allegation:Staff are not providing activities for residents to do together Based on interviews and observations the facility does have some activities and reading materials avaliable to residents but the materials were kept where residents could not see them. When interviewed S1 stated that they do not have an activites calender and just do activites throughout the week when resident are requesting something to do. Based on LPA’s interviews and record review, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. California Code of Regulations, Title 22 has been cited.Exit interview conducted. A copy appeal rights, and this report provided. Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 25, 2026 · control 15-AS-20260105154319

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87219(b) · Plan of correction due date: Mar 11, 2026

(b) Residents served shall be encouraged to contribute to the planning, preparation, conduct, clean-up and critique of the planned activities.This requirement is not met as evidenced by: The facility does not have an daliy activities schedule for the residents.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 25, 2026

Plan of correction: The facility administrator agrees to in colaberation with the residents create a activites schedule for the next month. The facility administrator also agrees to review the regulations. Proof of correction will be sent to CCLD by POC date

Type of visit: Case Management - Other

LPA conducted Component III with Licensee/Administrator, during visit. LPA presented Component III Power Point and discussed the regulations embodied in the presentation. No issues noted during inspection. LPA observed that facility is ready to be licensed. This report will be submitted to the Centralized Application Bureau (CAB) and a final review of the application will be conducted. This facility is not yet licensed and is subject to final approval by CAB. Additional requirements may still be required. Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 7, 2025

Type of visit: Prelicensing

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jill Clancy-Czuleger, conducted an un-announced pre-licensing inspection. License application is for (6) total capacity, of which 5 maybe non-ambulatory and (1) maybe bedridden. Fire clearance was granted on September 05,2025. LPAs met with Suresh Reddy (applicant-administrator). LPA inspected the facility inside out. There is no body of water. Physical plant is consistent with the facility sketch received by Central Application Bureau (CAB) and approved by the fire department. LPAs inspected the living room, dining area, kitchen, bedrooms, hallways, bathrooms, side and backyards. Bedrooms were observed appropriately furnished with adequate lighting and drawers. Facility has sufficient towels, extra bed sheets and comforters. Equipment and supplies for residents' personal hygiene are available and on site. Dinner and silver wares were observed sufficient for residents' use. Food supplies checked and observed good for seven days of non-perishables. Facility was observed equipped with refrigerator, microwave, dishwasher, washer and dryer. Cabinet for knives, cleaning supplies, and central storage for medications were observed with locks. Activity supplies were available. Outdoor activity space was observed furnished with tables, chairs. Fire extinguishers were observed fully charge and tags showed serviced June 20, 2025. The two-in-one carbon monoxide and smoke detector observed functional. First aid kit checked and observed complete with manual. There are no corrections to be made. A exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report has been provided. Accordingly, LPA will submit a copy of this facility evaluation report to the Central Application Bureau (CAB) for review. If the applicant has questions regarding the status of the application, they have been instructed to communicate with the CAB Analyst assigned to their application.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 7, 2025

Type of visit: Prelicensing

Licensing Program Analysts (LPA) J. Clancy-Czuleger and A, Christy, conducted an un-announced visit to the facility for the purpose of a Pre-Licensing evaluation. LPA's met with Caregiver Bryan Calpo and explained the purpose of the visit. This is pre-licensing visit is for a change of ownership. Licensee Suresh Reddy was called and he informed the LPA's that he is out of town and is not able to attend a meeting today. LPAs observed that the residents currently in care are in good health and two caregivers are working. LPAs informed Suresh Reddy that his attendance is needed for the Pre-Licensing evaluation and LPAs will make another attempt on another date. Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 19, 2025

Type of visit: Office

Facility Type: RCFE Application Type: CHOW Capacity: 6 Census: 3 COMP II Participants: Sureshkumar Reddy, LLC Member/Administrator Interview Method: Telephone interview On 5/29/25, applicant/administrator participated in COMP II. Identification of the applicant/administrator was verified through interview questions based on photo ID and other identifying personal information. During COMP II, applicant/administrator confirmed that they have read and understand community care facility licensing laws included in the Health and Safety Codes and the California Code of Regulations Title 22. Signed LIC 809 with copy of photo ID have been obtained. During COMP II, CAB analyst confirmed Applicant/Administrator’s understanding of following areas: 1. Facility operation: License type, client/resident populations, and program 2. Admission Policies 3. Staffing requirements & Training 4. Restrictive/Prohibited Health Conditions 5. General provisions 6. Emergency Preparedness 7. Complaints & Reporting 8. Pre-licensing readinessthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 29, 2025