Small home · Licensed for 6 · Oxnard
Rose Garden Manor IV
745 Berkshire Place, Oxnard, CA 93033Licensed since 2018
Overview
No openings reported
- Approved by the state: WheelchairState licensing record · October 26, 2026
- Licensed for 6: a small care homeThe state license record
Ask this home
Free for families. A home gets your number only if you say yes.
Care and support
- Wheelchairup to 4 residents
Not on file: dementia, hospice and bedridden approvals.
Approved by the state · State licensing record · October 26, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.
Read the state’s own wording
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. APPROVED FOR 2 AMBULATORY AND 4 NON-AMBULATORY.
935 - ELDERLY
CDSS record, verbatim · October 26, 2026
As needs change
We’ll ask for you. Not on file for Rose Garden Manor IV: two-person transfers or a lift, who is awake overnight, help with medicines, staying through hospice and care if memory loss develops. When we check availability, we ask about these too.
Check availabilityWhat it costs here
Covelight estimate
$4,450a month to start
Likely $3,650–$5,450
From 12 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file
Monthly cost breakdownWith a shared room and basic help · room, care and fees$4,450likely a month
Memory care is not priced here: a dementia-care designation is not on file for this home. Ask the home.
Starting monthly rate$4,450likely $3,650–$5,450
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 12 small homes and similar homes within 10 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600
Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (44 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).
One-time move-in fee$2,500one time · likely $0–$4,000
Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,500 (133 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.
- Likely monthly totalLikely $3,650–$5,650
- $4,450
- First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $4,300–$8,850
- $6,950
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
- MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
- Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
- Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated October 1, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
- SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
- VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
- Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
Rates at nearby homes12 nearby homes publish starting rates of $3,210 to $8,000
12 homes like this within 10 miles publish starting rates mostly between $3,250–$6,150.
- Absolute Care HomeOxnard · 0.9 mi · Small home$3,300Listed on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026
- Sea Breeze ManorOxnard · 3.3 mi · Small home$4,800Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Mom and Dad Home CareOxnard · 3.8 mi · Small home$5,000Listed on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026
- Villa Teresa Residential CareOxnard · 3.8 mi · Small home$3,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Ocean Breeze at BeechwoodCamarillo · 8.5 mi · Small home$5,700Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Ventura Grand ChateauVentura · 8.9 mi · Mid-size home$3,500Listed on Seniorly · memory care private room · seen September 9, 2026. We don’t have this home’s dementia-care disclosure. California requires a home that advertises dementia care to describe that care in writing when you ask.
- Ventura Villa Assisted LivingVentura · 9.5 mi · Mid-size home$3,750Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Brookhaven AlCamarillo · 9.5 mi · Small home$6,000Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Finest Living at ArcadeVentura · 9.7 mi · Small home$3,210Listed on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026
- Via EsmeraldaCamarillo · 9.8 mi · Small home$6,500Listed on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026
- Rowe ResidenceVentura · 9.9 mi · Small home$8,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
- Cottage InnVentura · 9.9 mi · Small home$7,300Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 12 small homes and similar homes within 10 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
- Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
- Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
- Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
- Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
- We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
- It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
- The care level
Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.
- What is billed separately
Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.
- Move-in costs
A one-time move-in fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.
- Increases
California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.
An estimate for planning, not a quote. A home sets the price after hearing about the care needed.
Daily life
Daily life here is not on file yet. Most small homes haven’t published it, and that says nothing about the home.
The best way to see it is a visit.
Request a tourWhere it is
745 Berkshire Place, Oxnard, CA 93033Address from the public record · October 26, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.
Opening the neighborhood map…
- St Johns Regional Medical CenterHospital · General acute care, on the state’s list4.3 mi
Straight-line distances; check the drive or the walk. Hospital: the nearest general acute care hospital on the state’s list (CDPH, September 16, 2026).
Open directionsThe state record
California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.
CDSS public record, read October 26, 2026 · License #565802133 · See the state’s own record
The last 36 months — 7 of 10 documents
Complaint outcomes in these 36 months, in the state’s words: 4 “Unsubstantiated”.
20262 state visits · 2 documents
Jul 22, 2026Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kelly Dulek arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct a required annual visit. At 11:00 a.m., the LPA arrived at the facility and called Licensee/Administrator, Amalia Soratorio and explained the reason for the visit. At 11:33 a.m., Licensee/Administrator arrived at the facility and allowed the LPA entry. Entrance interview conducted. Starting at 12:20 p.m., the LPA, along with Administrator toured the physical plant areas inside and outside to ensure there are no health and safety hazards. The following was observed: KITCHEN: The LPA observed the kitchen and dining area. Knives and cleaning supplies were locked and are stored underneath the kitchen sink. Kitchen appliances are in operable condition. The facility has a sufficient supply of perishable and non-perishable food and emergency food and water. COMMON AREAS: The LPA observed common area to be relatively clean and properly furnished. The LPA observed the fire extinguishers to be fully charged and last serviced on 09/12/2025. At 03:25 p.m., fire alarms/carbon monoxide detectors were tested and functioned properly. There is a working telephone on premises. Laundry units are located near the kitchen area. The LPA observed a closet near the laundry area with additional bed sheets and towels. OUTDOOR SPACE: The LPA observed the back patio and enclosed patio which has a covered outdoor area for resident use. There are two (2) gates on each side of the house designated for emergency exits. All passageways were observed to be free from hazards. There are no bodies of water on the premises. The garage is detached. Report Continued on LIC 809-C BEDROOMS: The facility is a single-story residential home with four (4) bedrooms, two (2) of which are private resident rooms and two (2) are shared resident rooms. The LPA observed resident bedrooms, which were furnished appropriately with clean linens, appropriate furnishings and sufficient lighting. Inside temperature was maintained at a comfortable level. RESTROOMS: The two (2) facility restrooms are relatively clean and sanitary and in operating condition with grab bars and slip-resistant surfaces. Hot water was tested in the shared resident restroom and measured 116.2 degrees Fahrenheit. The sinks had sufficient liquid soap and paper towels. RECORD REVIEW: Beginning at 12:50 p.m., the LPA conducted a file review for five (5) residents and five (5) staff and observed the following: Staff have current first aid and CPR. Resident records were reviewed for but not limited to: Individual Program Plan (IPP), medical records, P & I funds, admissions agreement, quarterly reports and consent forms. All files were in order. Administrator’s Certificate is valid until 11/01/2026. The last fire drill took place on 07/01/2026. The LPA observed documentation of the Infection Control Plan and Emergency and Disaster Plan. At 02:49 p.m., the LPA conducted a review of medication and medication documentation with staff for two (2) out of six (6) residents and observed that medications were properly documented and assisted as prescribed. During the visit, the LPA spoke with three (3) residents and three (3) staff. No concerns were noted. No deficiencies cited at this time. Exit interview conducted. A copy of the report was issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 22, 2026
Apr 7, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff is not allowing resident to have phone calls with family members. Resident was not permitted to visit privately with their visitor.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Emily Peraldi conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint visit to this facility. At 1:25 p.m., the LPA met with staff and explained the reason for the visit. At 1:57 p.m., the Licensee, Amalia Soratorio arrived at the facility. During the initial visit conducted on 12/23/2025, between 11:00 a.m. and 1:30 p.m., the LPA conducted a physical plant tour and conducted interviews with the Licensee, two (2) staff and five (5) clients. During today’s visit the LPA conducted a physical plant tour and an interview with Client #1 (C1). During both visits, the LPA obtained copies of pertinent documents. Continued on LIC 9099-C. Unsubstantiated Regarding the allegations: 1.) Staff is not allowing resident to have phone calls with family members. 2.) Resident was not permitted to visit privately with their visitor. It was alleged that Client #1 (C1) was not allowed to receive phone calls or visit privately with a family member. Interviews with C1 revealed indifferences and uncertainty of maintaining communication or having visitation with a certain family member. Throughout both interviews with C1, C1 did not state that the indifference or refusal to see said family member is due to the Licensee’s rules or influence. Interview with the Licensee revealed that facility staff do not restrict phone calls or visitation. The Licensee stated that the clients have the right to phone calls and visitation but it’s also their right to refuse visitation or phone calls. The LPA reminded the Licensee that facility staff cannot restrict visitation or phone calls unless there are legal documents such as a restraining order in place. The LPA reminded the Licensee to keep a copy of such legal documents in resident’s files. The information obtained during the investigation did not include evidence sufficient to corroborate the allegations. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. Exit interview conducted. A copy of the report was issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 7, 2026 · control 29-AS-20251215082724
20252 state visits · 2 documents
Jul 17, 2025Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Emily Peraldi arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct a required annual visit. At 9:30 a.m., the LPA arrived at the facility and called Licensee, Amalia Soratorio and explained the reason for the visit. At 9:55 a.m., staff arrived at the facility and allowed the LPA entry. At 10:14 a.m., the Licensee, Amalia Soratorio arrived at the facility. RECORD REVIEW: Between 10:16 a.m. and 11:56 a.m., the LPA conducted a file review for all six (6) residents and staff regularly scheduled and observed the following: Staff have current first aid and training documentation. Resident records were reviewed for but not limited to: Individual Program Plan (IPP), medical records, P & I funds, admissions agreement, quarterly reports and consent forms. All files were in order. Administrator’s Certificate is valid until 11/01/2026. The last fire drill took place on 07/05/2025. The LPA observed documentation of the Infection Control Plan and Emergency and Disaster Plan. At 12:00 p.m., the LPA conducted a review of medication and medication documentation with staff for three (3) out of six (6) residents and observed that medications were properly documented and assisted as prescribed. Starting at 12:56 p.m., the LPA, along with staff toured the physical plant areas inside and outside to ensure there are no health and safety hazards. Continued on LIC-809-C. KITCHEN: The LPA observed the kitchen and dining area. Knives and cleaning supplies locked and are stored underneath the kitchen sink. Kitchen appliances are in operable condition. The facility has a sufficient supply of perishable and non-perishable food. At 12:59 p.m., hot water measured at 107.5-degree Fahrenheit. COMMON AREAS: The LPA observed common area to be relatively clean and properly furnished. The LPA observed the fire extinguishers to be fully charged and last serviced on 10/04/2024. At 1:09 p.m., fire alarms/carbon monoxide detectors were tested and functioned properly. There is a working telephone on premises. Laundry units are located near the kitchen area. The LPA observed a closet near the laundry area with additional bed sheets and towels. OUTDOOR SPACE: At 1:08 p.m., the LPA observed the back patio and enclosed patio which has a covered outdoor area for resident use. There are two (2) gates on each side of the house designated for emergency exits. There are no bodies of water on the premises. The garage is detached. Additional cleaning solutions are locked and located inside the garage. BEDROOMS: The facility is a single-story residential home with four (4) bedrooms and two (2) bathrooms. The LPA observed resident bedrooms, which were furnished appropriately with clean linens, appropriate furnishings and sufficient lighting. Inside temperature was maintained at a comfortable level. RESTROOMS: Restrooms are relatively clean and sanitary and in operating condition with grab bars and non-skid mats. At 1:04 p.m., hot water measured at 105.5-degree Fahrenheit. The sinks had sufficient liquid soap, and paper towels. During the time of the visit, the LPA spoke with all three (3) residents and one (1) staff. No concerns were noted. No deficiencies cited at this time. Exit interview conducted. A copy of the report was issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 17, 2025
Jan 24, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff did not allow resident to have visitors while in care.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Emily Peraldi along with Quality Assurance Specialist (QAS) Tri-Counties regional center Katy Robison conducted an unannounced initial complaint visit to this facility. At 9:30 a.m., the LPA met with staff and explained the reason for the visit. At 10:11 a.m., the Licensee arrived at the facility. At 9:56 a.m., the LPA along with staff conducted a physical plant tour. Starting at 9:59 a.m., the LPA conducted interviews with the Licensee and one (1) staff, and one (1) resident. At 10:45 a.m., the LPA obtained copies of pertinent documents. Continued on LIC 9099-C. Unsubstantiated Regarding the allegation: Staff did not allow resident to have visitors while in care. On 1/15/2025, the Department received a complaint alleging facility staff is restricting Resident #1 (R1) visitation from Individual #1 (I1). It was alleged that I1 attempted to visit R1 on Sunday January 12, 2025, and that staff did not allow I1 to see R1 as they told I1 that R1 was not home. Per interview with the Licensee, it was revealed that facility staff did not restrict I1 from visiting R1 instead I1 came to the facility while R1 was out in the community. The LPA reviewed R1’s daily notes and the facility’s sign in and out sheet and confirmed that R1 was out in the community on January 12, 2025. The Licensee stated that residents are always allowed visitors and that she has not restricted R1 from seeing I1. The LPA reminded the Licensee that facility staff cannot restrict visitation unless there are legal documents such as a restraining order in place. The LPA reminded the Licensee to keep a copy of such legal documents in resident’s files. The information obtained during the investigation did not include evidence sufficient to corroborate the allegation. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. Exit interview conducted. A copy of the report was issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 24, 2025 · control 29-AS-20250115113432
20243 state visits · 3 documents
Nov 14, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff did not allow resident to have visitors while in care.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Emily Peraldi conducted an unannounced initial complaint visit to this facility. At 11:30 a.m., the LPA called the Licensee, Amalia Soratorio and explained the reason for the visit. At 11:45 a.m., the Licensee arrived at the facility and allowed the LPA entrance to the facility. Between 11:51 a.m. and 1:40 p.m., the LPA conducted interviews with the Licensee and four (4) residents. At 12:50 p.m., the LPA along with the Licensee conducted a physical plant tour. At 12:58 p.m., the LPA obtained copies of pertinent documents. Continued on LIC 9099-C. Unsubstantiated Regarding the allegation: Staff did not allow resident to have visitors while in care. On 11/07/2024, the Department received a complaint alleging facility staff restricting Resident #1 (R1) visitation from Individual #1 (I1). It was alleged that I1 attempted to visit R1 last year in January 2023 and that staff did not allow I1 to see R1. Per interview with Licensee, it was revealed that facility staff did not restrict I1 from visiting R1 instead I1 came to the facility in the morning while R1 was at day program. The Licensee explained that I1 has not returned to the facility since then. The Licensee stated that residents are always allowed visitors and that majority of the residents do receive visitors or residents leave the facility with family. The LPA reminded the Licensee that facility staff cannot restrict visitation unless there are legal documents such as a restraining order in place. The LPA reminded the Licensee to keep a copy of such legal documents in resident’s files. The information obtained during the investigation did not include evidence sufficient to corroborate the allegation. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. Exit interview conducted. A copy of the report was issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 14, 2024 · control 29-AS-20241107134508
Aug 1, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff are not adequately trained Staff falsified resident records Staff are not fingerprint cleared Residents are being financially abused by the licensee
At 3:35 p.m. Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Esther Cortez conducted an unannounced initial 10-day complaint visit for the above allegations. Upn arrival the LPA met with staff and administrator Amalia Soratorio arrived shortly after. During today's inspection, between 3:30 p.m. and 6:00 p.m., the LPA conducted a file review, interviewed the administrator, two (2) staff, three (3) residents and obtained copies of records and other pertinent documents relevant to the investigation. On the allegation that Staff are not adequately trained, it is the reporting party’s concern that staff are working without being trained. To investigate the allegation, the LPA conducted a staff record review for five (5) of nine (9) staff, and interviewed staff and the administrator. Report will continue on LIC9099-C. Unsubstantiated The record review revealed that all staff received the required training and continue to receive on going training. Interview with administrator Amalia revealed that the staff receives orientation training, continuation on-site training, CPI training, medication training and Direct Support Professional Training. Staff interviews revealed that they received training in Direct Support Professional training and on-site training. Based on interviews and record review the allegation above is deemed unsubstantiated at this time. On the allegation that Staff are not fingerprint cleared, it is the concern of the reporting party that staff without background clearance are working at the facility. To investigate the allegation, the LPA requested all staff’s records for the staff reflected on the LIC500 (Personnel Roster) including the staff observed at the facility. The LPA reviewed records and the reviewed records revealed that all staff members were background cleared and are associated with this facility. Staff interviews confirmed there are no other adults who work at the facility other than those on the staff schedule. Based on interviews and record review the above allegation is deemed unsubstantiated at this time. On the allegation that Staff falsified resident records and Residents are being financially abused by the licensee; it is the concern of the reporting party that the Licensee had Staff help in making false documents including receipts for personal purchases being shown as client purchases. To investigate the allegation, the LPA conducted a record review of the clients record of client’s/resident’s safeguard cash resource (LIC 405) for all of the six (6) clients that the facility safeguards their cash resources for, and conducted interviews. The LPA observed all LIC 405 forms properly documented with each transaction dated, signed by the client, correct amounts and balances, and descriptions documented. The LPA observed supporting receipts that matched the LIC 405 transactions. Administrator Amalia conducted an audit of the clients cash in front of the LPA, all amounts and balances matched. LPA observed items at the facility that were listed at as the purchased items. Staff interviews revealed that staff buys items the clients ask for during outings and send the receipt to Administrator Amalia. All staff interviewed including the Licensee denied spending clients money or falsifying any records. All client interviews revealed that staff helps them buy items they want, and that they are happy at the facility. Based on information gathered, the Department does not have sufficient evidence to determine Staff falsified resident records and Residents are being financially abused by the licensee. Therefore, the above allegation is deemed unsubstantiated at this time. No citations were issued. Exit interview conducted. A copy of the report was provided to administrator Amalia Soratorio.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 1, 2024 · control 29-AS-20240726170440
Jul 9, 2024Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Esther Cortez arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct a required annual visit at 09:00AM. The LPA met with Licensee Amalia Soratorio and was explained the reason for the visit. There were no clients or any other staff when the LPA arrived. The home is vendored by Tri-Counties Regional Center as a level 4-E home. RECORD REVIEW: Beginning at 09:15AM, the LPA conducted a record review. Records were reviewed for documents including, but not limited to: health screening, TB test, staff training records, fingerprint clearance, resident physician's report, needs and service appraisal, personal rights, and resident cash resources. Five (5) resident records reviewed were complete and contained all required documents. 5 (five) staff files reviewed were complete. The LPA reviewed P&I records for all residents. Cash resources were separate and intact, and not be commingled with facility funds or petty cash. The LPA left the facility at 11:45 AM and returned at 1:15 PM. When the LPA arrived there were six (6) clients and three (3) staff present. MEDICATION REVIEW: Medications review began at 1:20 PM. Medications were observed locked in the hallway cabinet. Medications for two (2) residents were observed. All medications are labeled and maintained in compliance with label instructions, and state and federal law. All medications reviewed were recorded on the centrally stored medication and destruction record. The LPA inspected the first aid kit, which was complete. Continued on LIC 809-C At 1:51 PM the LPA along with facility staff toured the physical plant areas inside and outside to ensure there are no health and safety hazards and facility is in compliance with Title 22 Regulations. The following was observed: The LPA observed two (2) fire extinguishers at the facility, which were fully charged and last serviced 10/16/2023. At 02:05 PM, all smoke alarms and carbon monoxide detectors were tested and functioned properly. The LPA observed all required postings in the common area. KITCHEN: Kitchen appliances appeared to be in operable condition. The facility has a sufficient supply of perishable and non-perishable food, as well as emergency food and water supply. All knives and cleaning supplies were observed to be locked and properly stored at the time of the visit. BEDROOMS: The LPA observed the resident bedrooms, which were furnished appropriately with clean linens, appropriate furnishings and sufficient lighting. There are four (4) total bedrooms; 2 (two) are designated for private resident use and 2 (two) are designated as shared resident rooms. RESTROOMS: The LPA observed 2 (two) restrooms in the facility; one is a shared restroom and one is a private restroom. Resident restrooms are clean and sanitary and in operating condition with grab bars and non-skid surfaces. Water temperature was measured in the private resident restroom at 2:02PM and measured at 112.1 degrees Fahrenheit, which is within the required range. COMMON SPACES/OUTDOOR SPACE: In the common areas, walls and flooring were checked for cleanliness and good condition. At the time of the visit, living room and dining room furniture was observed to be in good condition. A fireplace was observed to be adequately inaccessible. Laundry room was observed with locked chemical storage. The backyard has an enclosed patio and outdoor area equipped for resident use. There were no bodies of water noted. The detached garage was observed unlocked and contained storage. INTERVIEWS: Throughout today's visit, LPA interviewed two (2) residents and two (2) staff. No immediate concerns were voiced. Exit interview conducted. A copy of the report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 9, 2024
The state marks this report as 3 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 2. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.
Earlier years2022 to 2023 · 3 documents
20232 state visits · 2 documents
Sep 13, 2023Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Uncleared staff working at the facility. Facility staff are untrained.
On 10/02/2023, LPA Urena conducted a visit to amend this report. The LPA met with the administrator and explained the reason for the visit. This is an amended report to reflect the correct citation for the violation and to assess civil penalties for the violation. Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sandra Urena conducted an unannounced 10-day visit to investigate the allegations listed above. The LPA met with administrator Amalia Soratorio and explained the reason for the visit. At 1:30 p.m. the LPA requested and reviewed records pertaining to the allegations. The LPA interviewed staff at 1:55 p.m. and interviewed the administrator at 2:20 p.m. Continues on LIC 9099C... Substantiated Uncleared staff working at the facility. On the allegation that uncleared staff are working at the facility, it is the concern of the reporting party that staff without background clearance are working at the facility. To investigate the allegation, the LPA requested staff’s records for the staff reflected on the LIC500 (Personnel Roster). The LPA reviewed records and the reviewed revealed that one staff member was not background cleared. The interview with staff revealed that they had started working recently at the facility and could not provide proof of receiving background clearance. The interview with the administrator revealed that one staff, was hired recently and that they had submitted documentation to the CCLD Regional Office. However, the administrator could not provide proof of the staff being background cleared. Based on the information obtained through interviews and record review, there is sufficient evidence to support the allegation that staff without background clearance are working at the facility. Therefore, the allegation is deemed Substantiated at this time. Facility staff are untrained. On the allegation that facility staff are untrained, it is the reporting party’s concern that staff are working with residents and have not been properly trained. To investigate the allegation, the LPA conducted staff record review, and interviewed staff and the administrator. The record review revealed that one (1) out of five(5) staff did not receive training. The Administrator interview revealed that the staff was being oriented and was receiving training on site. The staff’s interview revealed that they received training in Direct Support Professional training in 04/18/2017 and 05/18/2018, but not current training by the facility. Based on the information obtained through interviews, and record review, there is sufficient evidence to support the allegation that facility staff are untrained. Therefore, the allegation is deemed Substantiated at this time. Pursuant to Title 22 of the CA Code of Regulations (CCR), the following deficiencies were cited (refer to LIC 809-D) Citations were issued. Exit interview conducted. A copy of the report and Appeal Rights were issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 13, 2023 · control 29-AS-20230913081312
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87355(e)(1) · Plan of correction due date: Oct 27, 2023
87355 Criminal Record Clearance (e) All individuals subject to a criminal record review... shall prior to working... in a licensed facility:(1) Obtain a California clearance or a criminal record exemption as required by the Department or ...This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on observation, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above as one (1) out of six (6) staff did not have a criminal record clearance, which poses an immediate health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 13, 2023
Plan of correction: The Administrator has agreed to do the following: Obtain verification from DOJ Background Check Bureau to show that S1 is cleared prior to working at the facility. S1 will not work at the facility until they are cleared.
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87411(d)(3) · Plan of correction due date: Oct 27, 2023
Personnel Requirements – General (d) All personnel shall be given on the job training.…(3) Skill and knowledge required to provide necessary resident care and supervision, including the ability to communicate with residents. This requirement is not met as evidenced by:the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 13, 2023
Plan of correction: The Administrator has agreed to do the following: To provide 40 hours of initial training (per regulations) to staff prior to starting to work directly with residents
Jul 29, 2023Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kelly Dulek arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct a required annual visit at 09:33AM. LPA initially met with Facility Designee Marilyn Galang. Licensee Amalia Soratorio was contacted via telephone and arrived at the facility at 10:20AM. Entrance interview conducted. Beginning at 09:58AM, the LPA, along with facility staff toured the physical plant areas inside and outside to ensure there are no health and safety hazards and facility is in compliance with Title 22 Regulations. The following was observed: Hardwired smoke and Carbon Monoxide detectors were tested at 12:10PM and were functional at the time of the visit. BEDROOMS: The LPA observed the resident bedrooms, which were furnished appropriately with clean linens, appropriate furnishings and sufficient lighting. There are 4 (four) total bedrooms; 2 (two) are designated for private resident use and 2 (two) are designated as shared resident rooms. RESTROOMS: The LPA observed 2 (two) restrooms in the facility; one is a shared restroom and one is a private restroom. Resident restrooms are clean and sanitary and in operating condition with grab bars and non-skid surfaces. Water temperature was measured in the private resident restroom at 12:29PM and measured at 109.8 degrees Fahrenheit, which is within the required range. COMMON SPACES: In the common areas, walls and flooring were checked for cleanliness and good condition. At the time of the visit, living room and dining room furniture was observed to be in good condition. The LPA observed the required postings in the common area. A fireplace was observed to be adequately inaccessible. Laundry room was observed with locked chemical storage. Fire extinguishers were observed to be fully charged and last serviced on 09/19/2022. Continued on LIC 809-C OUTDOOR SPACE: The backyard has an enclosed patio and outdoor area equipped for resident use. There were no bodies of water noted. The detached garage was observed locked and contained storage. KITCHEN: Kitchen appliances appeared to be in operable condition. The facility has a sufficient supply of perishable and non-perishable food, as well as emergency food and water supply. All knives and cleaning supplies were observed to be locked and properly stored at the time of the visit. RECORD REVIEW: Resident record review began at 10:11AM and staff files were reviewed at 11:38AM. Records were reviewed for documents including, but not limited to: health screening, TB test, staff training records, fingerprint clearance, resident physician's report, needs and service appraisal, personal rights, and resident cash resources. 5 (five) resident records reviewed were complete and contained all required documents. 5 (five) staff files were reviewed; 2 (two) of 5 (five) care staff files reviewed contained proof of CPR training, but training certificates did not indicate first aid training was completed. INFECTION CONTROL/EMERGENCY DISASTER PLAN: During today’s visit at 11:30AM, the LPA reviewed the facility’s infection control practices and emergency disaster plan. The facility’s policies and procedures as it pertains to infection control are adequate. Emergency Disaster Plan was observed to be completed and reviewed annually. Emergency drills are conducted monthly, with the last documented drill on 07/01/2023. MEDICATION REVIEW: Medications were observed locked in the hallway cabinet. Review began at 11:53AM. Medications for 5 (five) residents were observed. All 5 (five) of 5 (five) residents' medications were observed to be maintained and administered in compliance with regulation. INTERVIEWS: Throughout today's visit, LPA interviewed 3 (three) residents and 2 (two) staff. No citations issued. Exit interview conducted. A copy of the report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 29, 2023
The state marks this report as 3 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 2. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.
20221 state visit · 1 document
Jun 29, 2022Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Teresa Camara arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct a required annual visit at 02:05 p.m.. This annual had a specific emphasis on infection control practices and procedures. The LPA met with back-up Administrator Marilyn Galang and explained the reason for the visit. The LPA toured the physical plant areas inside and outside to ensure there are no health and safety hazards and the facility is in compliance with Title 22 Regulations. The carbon monoxide and smoke alarms were tested and all functioned properly. The fire extinguisher was last serviced on 09/08/2021. KITCHEN: Knives and cleaning supplies are stored in locked cabinets. Kitchen appliances were in operable condition. The facility has a sufficient supply of perishable and non-perishable food. BEDROOMS: The LPA observed two single-occupancy client bedrooms and two shared client bedrooms, which were furnished appropriately with clean linens and sufficient lighting. RESTROOMS: Restrooms are clean and sanitary and in operating condition. Hot water was 106.2*F. COMMON SPACES: Living room and dining room furniture was observed to be in good condition. The LPA observed the required postings upon entry. The backyard screened patio has furniture for clients' use. INFECTION CONTROL: During today’s visit, the LPA spoke with the Administrator regarding the facility’s infection control practices. Upon entry, the facility has a central entry point for symptom screening and sanitation station. All facility staff were observed wearing masks. The LPA observed an adequate supply of Personal Protection Equipment (PPE) and the facility is able to obtain additional supplies as needed. The facility has appropriate plans in place in the event of clients and/or staff are showing symptoms of COVID or testing positive for COVID. No deficiencies observed. Exit interview conducted. Report emailed to Administrator.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 29, 2022
5 of 6 beds were occupied at the April 7, 2026 state visit — a count on that day, not an opening.
License holder
Soratorio, Amalia, licensed since 2018.
Operates 2 licensed homes in California. Running more than one home is common and is neither good nor bad on its own.
- Rose Garden Manor III · Oxnard
The state’s totals for this licenseSince 2018, as the state’s facility page counts them
- State visits on file
- 10
- Total complaints
- 5
- Substantiated allegations
- 2
- Type A citations
- 2
- Type B citations
- 0
These are the state’s own totals for this license since 2018, per CDSS records. The state counts them apart from the documents above, and they can differ from what those documents show; the documents say what each visit found. One complaint can contain several allegations.
Compare with homes the same size
| This home | Typical | |
|---|---|---|
| Type A citations | 2 | 0 |
| Type B citations | 0 | 0 |
| Substantiated allegations | 2 | 0 |
| Total complaints | 5 | 0 |
“Typical” is the statewide median for licensed homes this size. It does not adjust for years licensed, and older licenses have had more visits and reports. The median is across the 6,916 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record. The figures compared are the state’s totals, not the documents.
What the state’s words mean
CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents stand in their place.
Frequently asked questions
A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.
Quick answers about Rose Garden Manor IV
Is Rose Garden Manor IV licensed?
The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
How many residents is Rose Garden Manor IV licensed for?
6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Has Rose Garden Manor IV been cited?
2 Type A and 0 Type B citations since 2018, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. Those records count 10 state visits over the same years.
Is Rose Garden Manor IV still open?
This license was on the CDSS roster as of November 12, 2026.
What does Rose Garden Manor IV cost?
$4,450 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $3,650–$5,450. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 12 small homes and similar homes within 10 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
Among 21 other homes of a similar licensed size across Ventura County that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $3,688 to $6,500 a month, and the middle figure is $5,700 (n = 21 other homes publishing a starting rate).
Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date between September and October 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.
A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.
The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.
A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.
Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
Does Rose Garden Manor IV take Medi-Cal?
On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated October 1, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
Who holds the license?
The license is held by Soratorio, Amalia, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Is there a hospital nearby?
St Johns Regional Medical Center is 4.3 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.
Can Rose Garden Manor IV keep a resident on hospice?
Not on file — the state’s record does not list hospice care on this license. Ask: “Can a resident stay here on hospice, and under what conditions?”
Rose Garden Manor IV license and inspection record
- Name on the license: “ROSE GARDEN MANOR IV”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
- License #565802133. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- Licensed for 6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- Licensed to Soratorio, Amalia, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- First licensed in 2018, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- 10 state inspection visits since 2018, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- 2 Type A and 0 Type B citations on file since 2018, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. The same records count 10 state visits in that period.
- 5 complaints and 2 substantiated allegations on file since 2018, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
- The most recent state visit on file is July 22, 2026, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗
Nearby
Other homes nearby
Licensed homes near this one in Ventura County, most information on file first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.
- Map
Starting rate
$3,300 a month to start
Listed by the home on A Place for Mom · September 9, 2026On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$5,150 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $4,250–$6,350On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$4,150 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $3,400–$5,150On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$5,050 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $4,150–$6,200On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$5,200 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $4,250–$6,400On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$5,150 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $4,200–$6,350On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
Street maps © Protomaps · © OpenStreetMap
Explore Ventura County