Skip to main content
CovelightCare
  • Start your search

    • MapExplore homes by area and what matters to you.
    • Directory
    • Guided search
    • Medi-Cal care homes

    Take a closer look

    • Check a home
    • Compare homes
    • Ask homes for me
  • Step by step

    • All care guidesEvery guide, in the order you’ll need them.
    • 1Step 1: Learn the kinds of care homes
    • 2Step 2: Ways to pay for care
    • 3Step 3: Find homes and check them
    • 4Step 4: Visit, and get the papers before you sign
    • 5Step 5: Move in
    • 6Step 6: The first months, and your rights

    Start with a question

    • Who pays for a care home?
    • Does Medi-Cal pay for a care home?
    • Board and care or assisted living?
    • Leaving the hospital soon?
    • Can a care home make someone leave?
    • Print a visit checklist
    • Check a home’s license
  • Professional tools

    • All professional tools
    • Discharge planning
    • Care management
    • Fiduciaries
    • Elder-law attorneys
    • Public-record worklist

    Care home operators

    • Manage your home’s profileYour home’s information and family inquiries.
    • Claim a home
    • Operator sign in
  • Get to know Covelight

    • How we work
    • Our data & sources
    • What’s new
    • Suggest a correction
    • Contact us
Saved homesGuided search
  • Start your search

    • MapExplore homes by area and what matters to you.
    • Directory
    • Guided search
    • Medi-Cal care homes

    Take a closer look

    • Check a home
    • Compare homes
    • Ask homes for me
  • Step by step

    • All care guidesEvery guide, in the order you’ll need them.
    • 1Step 1: Learn the kinds of care homes
    • 2Step 2: Ways to pay for care
    • 3Step 3: Find homes and check them
    • 4Step 4: Visit, and get the papers before you sign
    • 5Step 5: Move in
    • 6Step 6: The first months, and your rights

    Start with a question

    • Who pays for a care home?
    • Does Medi-Cal pay for a care home?
    • Board and care or assisted living?
    • Leaving the hospital soon?
    • Can a care home make someone leave?
    • Print a visit checklist
    • Check a home’s license
  • Professional tools

    • All professional tools
    • Discharge planning
    • Care management
    • Fiduciaries
    • Elder-law attorneys
    • Public-record worklist

    Care home operators

    • Manage your home’s profileYour home’s information and family inquiries.
    • Claim a home
    • Operator sign in
  • Get to know Covelight

    • How we work
    • Our data & sources
    • What’s new
    • Suggest a correction
    • Contact us
Guided search
Ventura Villa Assisted LivingLicense #565850093 · Covelight Care
Covelight CareVentura Villa Assisted LivingLicense #565850093 · 3482 Loma Vista Road, Ventura, CA · (805) 644-1292Record printed from covelightcare.com — data as of the dates shown on each item.
Home/California/Ventura County/Ventura/Ventura Villa Assisted Living
Map · 3482 Loma Vista Road

© Protomaps © OpenStreetMap

Starting rate$3,750/mo

Listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026 · See costs

Check availability

Request a tour

More days
  • AskThe cost, or your own question
  • (805) 644-1292

    From the state licensing record · October 26, 2026

  • venturavillaliving.com↗

Free for families. A home gets your number only if you say yes.

VV

Call Ventura Villa Assisted Living

Ventura · Licensed for 49

(805) 644-1292

From the state licensing record · October 26, 2026

From the home’s website, venturavillaliving.com:

venturavillaliving@yahoo.com · general email · seen October 5, 2026

or

Let us do the legwork

  • We ask about availability, price and the care you describe.
  • If it’s a fit, you choose whether they call you. Either way, you get every answer.
Check availabilityFree

Mid-size home · Licensed for 49 · Ventura

Ventura Villa Assisted Living

3482 Loma Vista Road, Ventura, CA 93003 · Licensed since 2021

  • Overview
  • Care
  • Costs
  • Daily life
  • Location
  • State record

Ventura Villa Assisted Living

Overview

Starting rate

$3,750 a month

Listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026 See costs

No openings reported

  • Approved by the state: Wheelchair · Dementia · Hospice · BedriddenState licensing record · October 26, 2026
  • Languages spoken: SpanishReported on A Place for Mom · September 9, 2026
  • Licensed for 49: a mid-size care homeThe state license record

Ask this home

Check availability

Request a tour

More days
  • AskThe cost, or your own question

Free for families. A home gets your number only if you say yes.

Care and support

  • Wheelchairup to 49 residents
  • Dementia
  • Hospiceup to 27 residents
  • Bedriddenup to 14 residents

Approved by the state · State licensing record · October 26, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.

Read the state’s own wording
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 49 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 14 MAY BE BEDRIDDENHOSPICE WAIVER APPROVED FOR 27.APPROVED FOR DELAYED EGRESS AND SECRED PERIMETER. BEDRIDDEN APPROVED FOR ROOMS: 105, 201, 202, 203, 204, 205, 207, 209, 301, 302, 303, 304, 305, AND 411.

983 - RCFE / DEMENTIA

CDSS record, verbatim · October 26, 2026

Care services

These are the home’s own statements about its day-to-day practice — they are not part of the state licensing record, and the state has not approved or reviewed them.

  • Assisted living

    Reported on venturavillaliving.com · seen October 5, 2026.

  • Help with bathing or showering

    Reported on venturavillaliving.com · source dated April 7, 2022.

  • Building is wheelchair accessible

    Reported on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Therapies availablePhysical Therapy · Occupational therapy · Occupational Therapy (OT) · Physical Therapy (PT)

    Physical Therapy — reported on venturavillaliving.com · source dated March 26, 2026.

    Occupational therapy · Occupational Therapy (OT) · Physical Therapy (PT) — reported on venturavillaliving.com · source dated April 7, 2022.

  • Diabetic / carbohydrate-controlled diet

    Reported on Caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Incontinence care

    Reported on venturavillaliving.com · source dated March 26, 2026.

  • Respite / short-term stays

    Reported on venturavillaliving.com · source dated April 7, 2022.

  • Help with dressing and grooming

    Reported on venturavillaliving.com · source dated April 7, 2022.

  • Medication management

    Reported on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Diabetes care

    Reported on venturavillaliving.com · source dated March 26, 2026.

  • Works with hospice

    Reported on Caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Activities of daily living the home lists help withActivities of daily living (ADL)

    Reported on venturavillaliving.com · source dated May 9, 2022.

  • Pharmacy services on site

    Reported on Caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Nurse coverageNurse on Staff (Part time)

    Reported on Caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Secured building entry

    Reported on Caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Visitor screening

    Reported on venturavillaliving.com · source dated March 26, 2026.

As needs change

  • Medicines

    Level of medication service: reminders only

    Caring.com · September 9, 2026

  • Staying through hospice

    Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 27 — care may continue at the end of life

    State licensing record · October 26, 2026

  • If memory loss develops

    Dementia-care designation on file

    State licensing record · October 26, 2026

We’ll ask for you. Not on file for Ventura Villa Assisted Living: two-person transfers or a lift and who is awake overnight. When we check availability, we ask about these too.

Check availability

What it costs here

This home’s starting rate

$3,750a month to start

Listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026

Costs & moving in

  • How care costs are added to the rentAll inclusive

    Reported on Caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Lowest monthly rate stated$3,750/moAssisted Living shared bedroom

    Reported on Seniorly · source dated August 24, 2026.

  • What the base rate includesIncontinence care and products

    Reported on venturavillaliving.com · source dated April 7, 2022.

  • Payment methodsCheck

    Reported on Caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

Monthly cost breakdownWith a shared room and basic help · room, care and fees$3,750likely a month
Room
Daily care
Sharing the room
  • Starting monthly rate$3,750this home

    The home lists this starting rate on Seniorly for assisted living shared bedroom, seen September 9, 2026.

  • Help with daily careIncludedper the home

    The home lists its rent as all-inclusive on Caring.com, seen September 9, 2026. Ask which care needs would change the monthly rate.

  • One-time move-in fee$2,500one time · likely $0–$4,000

    Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,500 (133 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.

Likely monthly totalLikely $3,750
$3,750
First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $3,750–$7,750
$6,250
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
  • MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
  • Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
  • Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated October 1, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
  • SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
  • VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
  • Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
If the money runs out, what Medi-Cal covers
Rates at nearby homes8 nearby homes publish starting rates of $3,210 to $8,000

$3,210$8,000

This homeA nearby home’s published starting rate

8 homes like this within 10 miles publish starting rates mostly between $3,250–$7,450.

  • Finest Living at ArcadeVentura · 1.0 mi · Small home
    $3,210Listed on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026
  • Ventura Grand ChateauVentura · 1.6 mi · Mid-size home
    $3,500Listed on Seniorly · memory care private room · seen September 9, 2026. We don’t have this home’s dementia-care disclosure. California requires a home that advertises dementia care to describe that care in writing when you ask.
  • Cottage InnVentura · 2.6 mi · Small home
    $7,300Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
  • Rowe ResidenceVentura · 5.5 mi · Small home
    $8,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
  • Sea Breeze ManorOxnard · 6.6 mi · Small home
    $4,800Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
  • Mom and Dad Home CareOxnard · 6.7 mi · Small home
    $5,000Listed on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026
  • Villa Teresa Residential CareOxnard · 6.7 mi · Small home
    $3,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
  • Absolute Care HomeOxnard · 9.2 mi · Small home
    $3,300Listed on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026
How this estimate worksWhere this price comes from

The home lists this starting rate on Seniorly for assisted living shared bedroom, seen September 9, 2026.

  • Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
  • Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
  • Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
  • Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
  • We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
  • It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
  • The care level

    Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.

  • What is billed separately

    Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.

  • Move-in costs

    A one-time move-in fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.

  • Increases

    California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.

Ask for the price

An estimate for planning, not a quote. A home sets the price after hearing about the care needed.

Daily life

Rooms, meals, activities and house rules, in the home’s own words. Open any detail to see where it came from.

Rooms & the spaces they will use (14)Shared / companion rooms · Outdoor space · Wifi
  • Shared / companion roomsReported no

    Reported on Caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Outdoor spaceGarden

    Reported on Caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Wifi

    Reported on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Room typesSingle occupancy · Double occupancy · Single · Private suites · Semi-private suites · Semi-Private · and 1 more

    Single occupancy · Double occupancy · Single — reported on venturavillaliving.com · source dated March 26, 2026.

    Private suites · Semi-private suites — reported on venturavillaliving.com · source dated April 7, 2022.

    Semi-Private · Studio — reported on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Common areasIndoor Common Areas

    Reported on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Roll-in / accessible shower

    Reported on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026.

  • LaundryDone by staff

    Reported on venturavillaliving.com · source dated March 26, 2026.

  • Wifi in resident rooms

    Reported on Caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Visitor parking

    Reported on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Air conditioning in the room

    Reported on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Housekeeping

    Reported on venturavillaliving.com · source dated March 26, 2026.

  • Cable or satellite TV

    Reported on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Salon or barber

    Reported on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Ground-floor units

    Reported on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026.

Meals, preferences & familiar food (6)All-day or flexible dining · Special diets supported · Meals served in the room
  • All-day or flexible dining

    Reported on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Special diets supportedNo Sugar · Low / No Sodium

    Reported on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Meals served in the room

    Reported on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Vegetarian or vegan optionsVegetarian

    Reported on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Family may eat with the resident

    Reported on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Meals provided

    Reported on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026.

Activities & the rhythm of a day (5)The shape of an ordinary day, as the home describes it · Activity types offered · Exercise or fitness program
  • The shape of an ordinary day, as the home describes itStaff assist residents with daily activities, routines, and recreational activities.

    Reported on venturavillaliving.com · source dated March 26, 2026.

  • Activity types offeredDaily activities · Recreational activities · Group activities · Daily activities that promote stimulation of senses · Activities that promote physical performance · Art Classes · and 8 more

    Daily activities · Recreational activities — reported on venturavillaliving.com · source dated March 26, 2026.

    Group activities · Daily activities that promote stimulation of senses · Activities that promote physical performance — reported on venturavillaliving.com · source dated April 7, 2022.

    Art Classes · Birthday Parties · Karaoke · Live Dance or Theater Performances · Resident Band or Musicians · Pet-focused Programs · Holiday Parties · Activities On-site · Live Musical Performances — reported on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Exercise or fitness programStretching Classes · Yoga/stretching

    Stretching Classes — reported on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026.

    Yoga/stretching — reported on Caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Religious services at the home

    Reported on Caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Religious services off site

    Reported on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026.

Faith, culture & language (3)Religious observance supported · Languages spoken by caregivers · Clergy or chaplain visits
  • Religious observance supportedCatholic Services

    Reported on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Languages spoken by caregiversSpanish · English

    Spanish — reported on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026.

    English — reported on Caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Clergy or chaplain visits

    Reported on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026.

Pets, routines & independence (2)Residents may bring a pet · Visiting hours
  • Residents may bring a petReported no

    Reported on Caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Visiting hoursYour loved ones can visit you in our facility as long as they follow protocols.

    Reported on venturavillaliving.com · source dated March 26, 2026.

Visiting & staying involved (4)Staff accompany residents to appointments · Public transit access claimed · Transportation costs extra
  • Staff accompany residents to appointments

    Reported on venturavillaliving.com · source dated March 26, 2026.

  • Public transit access claimed

    Reported on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Transportation costs extraReported no

    Reported on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Transport for group outings

    Reported on Caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

About the home (1)Brand or trade name
  • Brand or trade nameVentura Villa Assisted Living

    Reported on venturavillaliving.com · seen October 5, 2026.

Where it is

3482 Loma Vista Road, Ventura, CA 93003Address from the public record · October 26, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.

Opening the neighborhood map…

  1. 1Ventura County Medical CenterHospital · General acute care, on the state’s list0.3 mi

Straight-line distances; check the drive or the walk. Hospital: the nearest general acute care hospital on the state’s list (CDPH, September 16, 2026).

Open directions ↗

The state record

California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

CDSS public record, read October 26, 2026 · License #565850093 · See the state’s own record ↗

The last 36 months — 11 of 28 documents

Complaint outcomes in these 36 months, in the state’s words: 2 “Substantiated” and 3 “Unsubstantiated”.

20263 state visits · 6 documents

Sep 2, 2026Facility evaluation reportCase Management - DeficienciesDeficiency pages: Type A, Type B

Type of visit: Case Management - Deficiencies

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Valeria Conway conducted an unannounced CASE MANAGEMENT- DEFICIENCIES visit to this facility and met with, Joy Michayluk. The case management visit is being conducted due to deficiencies observed during the investigation of complaint control # 29-AS-20260203102145. During the complaint investigation, the following deficiencies were identified: During an interview, Staff #1 (S1) stated that, during a recent Influenza outbreak, Resident 1’s (R1’s) family member requested that facility staff administer oxygen to R1 rather than have R1 transported to the emergency room. S1 stated that, based on the family member’s request, S1 contacted Staff #2 (S2) via telephone and directed S2 to administer oxygen to R1. S2 followed S1’s direction and administered supplemental oxygen to R1. S1 and S2 were identified as non-skilled professionals. Records reviewed indicated that R1 was non-verbal, diagnosed with dementia, and fully dependent on facility staff for assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs). At the time of the incident, R1 was not receiving hospice services. Further review of R1’s records revealed no physician’s order for supplemental oxygen or an oxygen treatment plan at the time of the incident. When questioned regarding the oxygen equipment used during the incident, S1 stated that the oxygen equipment had been left at the facility by a former resident, adding that the equipment had not been removed by the agency after the resident’s services had concluded. Pursuant to Title 22, California Code of Regulations and/or CA Health and Safety Code, the following deficiencies were cited (refer to LIC 809-D.) Administrator was informed that failure to correct the deficiencies may result in civil penalties. Exit interview conducted, appeal rights discussed, and a copy of this report and appeal rights were provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 2, 2026

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87611(b)(2) · Plan of correction due date: Sep 3, 2026

87611(b), the licensee shall be responsible for the following: (2) Ensuring that oxygen administration is provided by an appropriately skilled professional should the resident require assistance. This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews and records review, the licensee/administrator did not comply with the regulation above as facility staff who were not skilled professionals administered supplemental oxygen to R1 per R1’s family member request.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 2, 2026

Plan of correction: The licensee write a statement of understanding on this regulation and submit to LPA prior to POC due date. Also they agree to contact an approved third party agency to conduct an in-service training with all staff regarding this regulation... and each staff member will write a statement of understanding including they are not permitted to independently initiate oxygen tratment in the absence of an authorized skilled professional. Documentation will be submitted to LPA by 9/15/2026.

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR87611(e) · Plan of correction due date: Sep 3, 2026

87611(e) In addition to Sections 87465(a) and 87464(d) the licensee shall ensure that the resident is cared for in accordance with the physician's orders and that the resident's medical needs are met. This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews and records review, the licensee/administrator did not comply with the regulation above as R1 was administered oxygen without an order from their physician.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 2, 2026

Plan of correction: The licensee write a statement of understanding on this regulation and submit to LPA prior to POC due date. Also they agree to contact an approved third party agency to conduct an in-service training with all staff regarding this regulation. In-service will be submitted to LPA before POC by 9/15/2026.

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87611(b)(3) · Plan of correction due date: Sep 15, 2026

In addition to Section 87611(b), the licensee shall be responsible for the following: (3) Ensuring that the use of oxygen equipment meets the following requirements: (I) Equipment shall be removed from the facility when no longer in use by the resident. Based on interviews and records review, the licensee/administrator did not comply with the regulation above as former resident’s oxygen equipment was left at the facility after their services concluded and were used to administer oxygen to R1.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 2, 2026

Plan of correction: The Licensee/Administrator will submit a statement of understanding regarding regulation cited. Licensee acknowledged information received and stated that oxygen tanks will be removed from the facility immediately once services concludes. Licensee will submitted to LPA prior to POC due date.

Jun 16, 2026Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not meet residents' medical needs

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Valeria Conway arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct subsequent complaint visit with the purpose of delivering findings for the allegation listed above. AT 10:15 A.M., LPA met with facility Lead Med Tech, Dora Islas, and explained the reason for today’s visit. Administrator, Joy Michayluk, and Office Manager, Angelica Arambulo, were contacted via telephone at 10:21 A.M and 10:51 A.M. Administrator and Office Manager were available during today's visit. Office Manager authorized Lead Med Tech to sign today's reports. Entrance interview conducted. During an initial complaint visit conducted on 02/11/2026, LPA Conway interviewed Lead Med Tech, Office Manager, Hospice Nurse, facility staff and residents. LPA also reviewed and obtained copies of documents pertinent to the investigation. Throughout the course of the investigation, LPA reviewed all documents and conducted additional interviews with relevant parties. Continued on LIC 9099-C Substantiated Continued from LIC 9099 During today's visit, a brief physical plant tour was conducted. The following was then determined: Regarding allegation of “Staff did not meet residents' medical needs” the Reporting Party (RP) alleged that during an emergency situation, emergency medical personnel were called and observed that multiple residents appeared to have required medical intervention days before the 911 call was placed. The investigation revealed that on 01/31/2026, emergency medical personnel responded to the facility during an influenza outbreak involving multiple residents. Interviews conducted with a hospice nurse revealed that upon arriving to provide services to a resident, the nurse observed the resident’s oxygen saturation level was critically low and instructed facility staff to call 911 immediately. When paramedics arrived, they observed additional residents exhibiting similar symptoms. Paramedics assessed additional residents and identified several individuals who required transportation to a hospital for further evaluation and treatment of low oxygen saturation levels and influenza-like symptoms. Interviews with facility staff indicated that changes in condition had been observed among multiple residents in the days preceding the emergency response and that management had been made aware of these concerns. Staff reported that the symptoms were believed to be consistent with a common flu illness and that the severity of the residents’ conditions, as well as the presence of an influenza outbreak, were not recognized, resulting in a delay in obtaining medical care. As a result, medical evaluation and treatment were not obtained until emergency responders were contacted. Based on interviews conducted, records reviewed, and documents obtained during the investigation, the allegation of “Staff did not meet residents' medical needs” is deemed Substantiated. Pursuant to Title 22, California Code of Regulations and/or CA Health and Safety Code, the following deficiencies were cited (refer to LIC 9099-D.) Administrator was informed that failure to correct the deficiencies may result in civil penalties. Exit interview conducted, appeal rights discussed, and a copy of this report and appeal rights were provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 16, 2026 · control 29-AS-20260203102145

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87464(f)(1) · Plan of correction due date: Jun 17, 2026

87464 Basic Services (f) Basic services shall at a minimum include: (1) Care and supervision as defined in Section 87101(c)(3) and Health and Safety Code section 1569.2(c). This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on interview and record review the licensee did not comply with the section cited above as the facility did not provide appropriate timely care for several residents during an influenza outbreak which posed an immediate health concern to clients in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 16, 2026

Plan of correction: Facility will conduct an in-service training provided by a third-party vendorship that is approved by the Department with all staff including management about the importance of noticing the signs/symptoms of illness and seeking appropriate medical attention in a timely manner. This training shall be schedule by POC due date and proof shall be submitted to LPA and proof of the completed training will be sent to LPA once training is conducted.

Jun 16, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Insufficient staffing

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Valeria Conway arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct subsequent complaint visit with the purpose of delivering findings for the allegation listed above. At 10:15 A.M., LPA met with facility Lead Med Tech, Dora Islas, and explained the reason for today’s visit. Administrator, Joy Michayluk, and Office Manager, Angelica Arambulo, were contacted via telephone at 10:21 A.M and 10:51 A.M. Administrator and Office Manager were available during today's visit. Office Manager authorized Lead Med Tech to sign today's reports. Entrance interview conducted. During an initial complaint visit conducted on 02/11/2026, LPA Conway interviewed Lead Med Tech, Office Manager, Hospice Nurse, facility staff and residents. LPA also reviewed and obtained copies of documents pertinent to the investigation. Throughout the course of the investigation, LPA reviewed all documents and conducted additional interviews with relevant parties. Continued on LIC 9099-C Unsubstantiated Continued from LIC 9099 During today's visit, a brief physical plant tour was conducted. The following was then determined: Regarding allegation of “Insufficient staffing” the Reporting Party (RP) alleged that facility did not have a nurse on site, residents were left unattended during a medical emergency. And staff were unable to provide emergency responders with essential resident information. The investigation revealed that the facility is licensed as a non-medical Residential Care Facility for the Elderly (RCFE) and is not required to maintain a nurse on site. During an interview, the Office Manager stated that at the time of the incident there were two (2) caregivers on duty, in addition to a hospice nurse who was present to provide services to a resident. Interview with staff indicated that when the medical emergency occurred, Staff #1 remained with emergency responders and assisted paramedics by providing documentation and information about the residents, while Staff #2 (S2) continued providing care and supervision to other residents within the facility. Staff denied living residents unattended. A review of staff timecards confirmed that two (2) caregivers were on duty at the time of the incident. Based on the above information gathered although the allegations may be valid, there is insufficient evidence to support the allegation. therefore, the allegation of “Insufficient staffing” is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. No citations issued. Copy of the report provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 16, 2026 · control 29-AS-20260203102145
Jun 16, 2026Facility evaluation reportCase Management - IncidentDeficiency page: Type A

Type of visit: Case Management - Incident

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Valeria Conway conducted an unannounced Case Management – Incident inspection pertaining to a self-reported Special Incident Report (SIR) received on 05/21/2026. At 10:15 A.M., the LPA met with facility Lead Med Tech, Dora Islas, and explained the reason for today’s visit. Administrator, Joy Michayluk, and Office Manager, Angelica Arambulo, were contacted via telephone at 10:21 A.M and 10:51 A.M. Administrator and Office Manager were available during today's visit. Office Manager authorized Lead Med Tech to sign today's reports. Entrance interview conducted. The self-reported SIR pertains to a medication error that occurred on 05/16/2026 involving nine (9) residents. According to the SIR, at approximately 7:00 A.M., caregivers administered resident’s bedtime medications instead of their scheduled morning medication. Upon discovering the error, the Med Tech (MT) who arrived at approximately 8:00 A.M., administered the correct morning medication. The SIR indicates that Staff #1 (S1) and Staff #2 (S2) were reprimanded and an in-service medication training was provided following the incident. Interview with Lead Med Tech revealed that medication had been pre-popped in advance and the morning caregivers mistakenly selected and administered the bedtime medication set. During the visit, the LPA requested documentation verifying that the in-service training had been conducted, however, documentation was not available to support completion of the training. Pursuant to Title 22 of the CA Code of Regulations, the following deficiencies were cited (refer to LIC 809-D). Exit interview conducted, today's reports and appeal rights were reviewed and issued to Lead Med Tech.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 16, 2026

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87465(h)(5) · Plan of correction due date: Jun 17, 2026

Incidental Medical...(h)The following requirements shall apply to medications which are centrally stored: (5) Each resident's medication shall be stored in its originally received container. No medications shall be transferred between containers. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on SIR and interviews, medication was removed from its original container in advanced causing staff to dispense the PM medication instead of the AM in error to residents in carethe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 16, 2026

Plan of correction: Facility will conduct an in-service training provided by a third-party vendorship that is approved by the Department with all staff including management about the importance of not pre-sorting medications along with providing a signed statement with all staff. This training shall be schedule by POC due date and proof shall be submitted to LPA and proof of the completed training will be sent to LPA once training is conducted.

Jun 16, 2026Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Valeria Conway arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct a required annual inspection. At 10:15 A.M., LPA met with facility Lead Med Tech, Dora Islas, and explained the reason for today’s visit. Administrator, Joy Michayluk, and Office Manager, Angelica Arambulo, were contacted via telephone at 10:21 A.M and 10:51 A.M. Administrator and Office Manager were not available during today's visit. Office Manager authorized Lead Med Tech to sign today's reports. Entrance interview conducted. LPA, along with Lead Med Tech, toured the physical plant areas inside and outside to ensure there are no health and safety hazards, and facility is in compliance with Title 22 Regulations. Lead Med Tech was unable to provide documentation regarding annual fire inspection. LPA tested the carbon monoxide detector which functioned properly during the visit. Fire extinguishers appeared fully charged and were last serviced on 06/01/2026. RESIDENT ROOMS/RESTROOMS: Resident rooms are either single or double occupancy. Eight (8) occupied resident rooms were observed during today's visit and contained the appropriate furnishings, linens, and bedding. LPA observed bed rails that extended the entire length of the bed of Resident’s #1 (R1’s). Per Lead Med Tech, R1 is not receiving hospice services. Technical Violation (TV) issued. Resident restrooms are jack-and-jill style - shared between 2 adjacent rooms. Six out of eight restrooms observed were not stocked with toilet paper, paper towels, or soap. LPA tested the hot water temperature in all occupied rooms. During the inspection, LPA observed that the sink in Room# 305 did not deliver hot water. Additionally, the hot water temperature in room #407 and #408 A&B were below the regulatory requirement. LPA further observed that the sinks in room #408 and #204 did not drain properly causing water to accumulate in the basin. Continued on LIC 809-C Continued from LIC 809 COMMON AREAS: Laundry room was inaccessible to residents during today’s visit. The facility has shower rooms for residents with non-slip surfaces when wet. LPA did not observe slip-resistant mats in the shower rooms. At 3:32 P.M. LPA observed that the delayed egress system installed at the facility's main entrance was not functioning properly. KITCHEN/DINING ROOM: The dining room was properly furnished and is also utilized as an activity area. The facility had a sufficient supply of food (perishable and non-perishable). Kitchen appliances appeared functional. During today’s visit the facility did not have a supply of emergency water. BUILDINGS AND GROUNDS: This facility is fully fenced and has a fire clearance for secured perimeter. There is covered seating on the patio for residents' use. During today’s visit LPA obtained a copy of the facility’s LIC 500 and resident roster. A copy of an old liability insurance was provided; Lead Med Tech did not have access to the current documentation. Due to time constraints LPA will return at a later date to conduct medication review record review. During today’s visit LPA informed the lice Lead Med Tech that removing medication from their original packaging in advance of administration (pre-popping) is not permitted. The following deficiencies were observed (See LIC 809-D) and cited from the California Code of Regulations, Title 22 and California Health and Safety Code. Failure to correct the deficiencies may result in additional civil penalties. Exit interview conducted. A copy of today's report and appeal rights were provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 16, 2026
Feb 11, 2026Facility evaluation reportCase Management - OtherDeficiency page: Type A

Type of visit: Case Management - Other

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Valeria Conway conducted an unannounced Case Management - Other visit in conjunction with a complaint visit (Complaint control # 29-AS-20260203102145.) The LPA was greeted by lead Med Tech Dora, Islas and informed them of the reason for the visit. At 2:45 PM, Office Manager, Angelica Arambulo arrived at the facility, however they were unable to sign today's report. Office manager authorized lead Med-Tech to sign today's report. Entrance interview conducted. On 02/02/2026, LPA Conway received a telephone call from a Public Health official requesting information regarding an influenza outbreak at the above facility. The Public Health official stated that the Department of Emergency Services had notified them that four (4) residents from the facility were transported to the hospital and diagnosed with Influenza. The Public health official further stated that attempts to contact the facility’s administrator to obtain additional information were unsuccessful. The first incident report submitted to Community Care Licensing (CCL) was received on 02/03/2026, after Public Health contacted the facility. The incident report submitted by the facility reported that four (4) residents were sent to the hospital due to flu-like symptoms and that Resident #1 (R1) passes away on 02/02/2026. As of 02/11/2026, CCL had not received a death report for R1. On 02/06/2026, LPA Conway contacted the facility office manager by telephone. The office manager confirmed that several residents and staff members had been experiencing flu-like symptoms since 01/25/2026, and acknowledge that by Saturday, 01/31/2026, the facility was experiencing an influenza outbreak. Despite this knowledge, the office manager failed to notify CCL and local health officer within 24 hours of the outbreak by telephone of facsimile. Additionally, they failed to report the death of R1 within seven (7) days from the date of occurrence, as required. Pursuant to Title 22, California Code of Regulations and/or CA Health and Safety Code, the following deficiencies were cited (refer to LIC 809-D.) Administrator was informed that failure to correct the deficiencies may result in civil penalties. Exit interview conducted, appeal rights discussed, and a copy of this report and appeal rights were provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 11, 2026

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87211(a) · Plan of correction due date: Feb 12, 2026

87211 Reporting Requirements (a) Each licensee shall furnish to the licensing agency such reports as the Department may require, including, but not limited to, the following: This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on interview conducted and records reviewed, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above as they did not submit an outbreak incident report within 24 hours and a death report within seven (7) days which poses an immediate health and safety risk to resident(s) in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 11, 2026

Plan of correction: Office Manager will write a statement of understanding on regulation 87211 and submit all pending incidents to LPA before PCO due date,

20253 state visits · 3 documents

Jul 7, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility was unable to provide power to residents during power outage Facility did not designate substitute staff during administrator’s absence Facility did not have an up-to-date and readily available emergency disaster plan Staff did not ensure that residents had hot water Staff are unable to communicate with residents due to language barrier

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Teresa Camara conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint investigation visit. LPA arrived at the facility, met with Medication Technician Dora Islas and explained the reason for the visit. Administrator and House Manager were not at the facility. On 1/21/2025, LPA conducted an initial complaint investigation visit at the facility. LPA conducted an interview with staff and collected information and documents from the House Manager. During today’s visit, starting at 10:26 a.m. LPA conducted interviews with four staff and a visitor. LPA also conducted a facility tour at 10:58 a.m. (continued on LIC9099C) Unsubstantiated (continued from LIC9099) Regarding the allegation “Facility was unable to provide power to residents during power outage”: This allegation was regarding a power outage that occurred on 1/13/2025, when Edison conducted a Public Safety Power Shutoff (PSPS) in the area due to fire danger. The power went off at approximately 5:00 a.m. At approximately 7:00 a.m. medication technician Dora Islas (Islas) arrived at the facility. Staff were using flashlights at the time. Most of the residents were still asleep. Islas turned on the generator when she got in. The facility generator powers emergency lighting in the rooms (overhead light), lighting in the hallway, and refrigerators/freezers. The house manager purchased battery operated lanterns for residents’ bathrooms. Natural gas was working in the facility, so they were able to use the stove and oven. The natural gas hot water heaters were also working. There are some areas of the facility where it takes more time for the water to heat up, but it does heat up. Staff also provided extra blankets to residents who needed them. Any residents who usually use additional items to keep warm, such as electric blankets or space heaters, were provided with extra blankets. The power was restored at 10:00 a.m. on 1/14/2025. The visitor who was interviewed did not recall the power outage. Based on interviews, this allegation is deemed unsubstantiated at this time. Regarding the allegation “Facility did not designate substitute staff during administrator’s absence”: In the hallway near the entry to the facility next to the front desk, the facility has photos up of the care staff and management team. The administrator, assistant administrator and house manager are all displayed on the bulletin board along with the care staff. If nobody from the management team is at the facility, the medication technician will step in to oversee the operation of the facility. The facility has also filed a Designation of Responsibility with Community Care Licensing. Based on interviews and records reviewed, this allegation is deemed unsubstantiated at this time. Regarding the allegation “Facility did not have an up-to-date and readily available emergency disaster plan”: The facility emergency disaster plan is located in the staff office which all staff have access to. The disaster plan is current and complete. When LPA requested to see the disaster plan, it took one minute for medication technician Dora Islas to locate it. Based on interviews and records reviewed, this allegation is deemed unsubstantiated at this time. (continued on LIC9099C) (continued from LIC9099C) Regarding the allegation “Staff did not ensure that residents had hot water”: This allegation was specifically regarding the hot water in the room belonging to Resident 1 (R1). According to staff, the facility’s natural gas was still working during the power outage of 1/13/2025 so the facility still had hot water and the ability to cook. R1’s bathroom sink has a small tankless water heater that uses electricity because R1’s representatives complained it took too long for the water in the sink to heat up. During the power outage that small electric water heater did not work. However, the gas water heaters for all facility plumbing were working, it just took a little more time for the water to heat up. Based on the information gathered from interviews, this allegation is deemed unsubstantiated at this time. Regarding the allegation “Staff are unable to communicate with residents due to language barrier”: The staff interviewed by LPA stated there are some staff working at the facility that do not speak fluent English. Those staff have been instructed on how to use a translation application on their cell phones. In addition, the administrator or house manager make sure there is an English speaking staff scheduled at all times at the facility. The visitor LPA interviewed stated they have problems communicating with certain staff, however they can go to other staff or the administrator if they need to communicate something. Based on these interviews and records reviewed, this allegation is deemed unsubstantiated at this time. Exit interview conducted. Copy of this report provided to the facility.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 7, 2025 · control 29-AS-20250114102924
Jun 23, 2025Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Teresa Camara arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct a required annual inspection. LPA met with Operations Manager Angelica Arambulo and explained the reason for the visit. LPA, along with the Manager, toured the physical plant areas inside and outside to ensure there are no health and safety hazards and facility is in compliance with Title 22 Regulations. The facility's last fire inspection was completed on 1/28/2025 with no concerns noted. LPA tested the carbon monoxide detector which functioned properly during the visit. Fire extinguishers appeared fully charged and were last serviced 12/2024. RESIDENT ROOMS/RESTROOMS: Resident rooms are either single or double occupancy. 10 (ten) resident rooms were observed during today's visit and contained the appropriate furnishings, linens, and bedding. Resident restrooms are jack-and-jill style - shared between 2 adjacent rooms. Restrooms observed were clean and sanitary in operating condition. Water temperature was tested in a sample of resident restrooms and measured at 106.1 degrees Fahrenheit which is within the required range of 105*F-120*F. COMMON AREAS: Laundry room door lock was broken at the time of the visit. Laundry detergent was observed to be accessible in the laundry room. The facility has shower rooms for residents with non-slip surfaces. LPA observed the surfaces were not non-slip when wet. The Manager stated they would get non-slip mats for the shower rooms. KITCHEN/DINING ROOM: The dining room was properly furnished and is also utilized as an activity area. The facility had a sufficient supply of food (perishable and non-perishable) and water. Kitchen appliances appeared functional. (continued on LIC809-C) (continued from LIC809) BUILDINGS AND GROUNDS: This facility is fully fenced and has a fire clearance for secured perimeter. There is covered seating on the patio for residents' use. STAFF: LPA spoke with three (3) staff; there were no concerns noted. LPA reviewed five (5) staff files and all were complete. Documents reviewed included, but were not limited to, training records, TB test results, health screenings, and fingerprint background clearance. RESIDENTS: LPA attempted interviews with residents, however due to cognitive decline was not able to complete the interviews. LPA reviewed five residents' files and all were complete. Documents reviewed included, but were not limited to, physician's reports, admission agreements, personal rights, and needs and services plans. MEDICATIONS: LPA reviewed medications which are stored in the locked medication room. The facility utilizes Medication Administration Records (MAR) to ensure medications are given correctly. The facility has Centrally Stored Medication and Destruction Records (CSMDR) created by the pharmacies, however the start dates for medications were not transferred to these forms. The Medication Technician was informed these dates must be transferred to the CSMDR. Otherwise, the medications reviewed appeared to be given as prescribed and the medications were properly labeled. The first aid kit is also stored in the locked medication room. The following deficiencies were observed (See LIC 809-D) and cited from the California Code of Regulations, Title 22 and California Health and Safety Code. Failure to correct the deficiencies may result in additional civil penalties. Exit interview conducted. A copy of today's report and appeal rights were provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 23, 2025

The state marks this report as 5 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 4. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.

Jan 17, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff inappropriately touched residents in care

On 01/17/2024, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Brian Phillips conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint investigation visit to the facility above. LPA arrived at the facility, met with Direct Support Staff Catalina Gonzalez in person and Operations Manager Angelica Arambulo by telephone as the administrator was unavailable, and announced the purpose of the visit. On the allegation: Staff inappropriately touched residents in care. It is alleged that a facility staff, Staff #1 (S1), has been sexually abusing and inappropriately touching Resident #1 (R1) and other residents in the facility. The Reporting Party (RP) stated that they were informed of this allegation by Witness #1 (W1), but it was unknown how W1 learned this information. The names of the alleged victims were not known, and it was unknown if there were any witnesses to corroborate the allegation. Interviews conducted by the Licensing Agency with Witness #1 (W1) could not confirm the allegation and W1 was not able to specifically identify the concerns that were allegedly reported. Continued on 9099-C Unsubstantiated W1 stated that they did not witness Staff #1 (S1) or any Staff behave indecently toward Resident #1 (R1) or other residents in care. Furthermore, W1 denied that staff reported that they witnessed S1 sexually abuse any residents. An interview with R1 did not reveal that they were sexually abused and R1 denied that they were inappropriately touched by any staff. No information was found by the Licensing Agency Investigations Branch (IB) to warrant a full investigation. The Reporting Party (RP) stated to the Licensing Agency that Resident #1 (R1) has not disclosed any sexual abuse to them but noted that R1 is mentally disabled and not capable of articulating due to a diagnosis of dementia. When interviewed, R1 did not express that any of the staff made them feel uncomfortable or unsafe. They also denied that any of the staff made them feel threatened or intimidated. R1 denied that any of the staff touched them inappropriately. R1 was asked if they knew the staff member, S1, named in the allegation and R1 stated that yes, they did know S1 but there was no problem with them. R1 did not remember the last time they saw S1. R1 denied that S1 made any sexual gestures toward them while they were around each other. All other residents in care at the facility interviewed by LPA stated that no staff member has made them feel threatened or intimidated. Residents stated to LPA that no staff member has physically touched them in an inappropriate way or made any type of sexual movement/gesture. Based on the information gathered, there is insufficient evidence to prove Staff inappropriately touched residents at the facility. Therefore, the allegation is Unsubstantiated. Exit interview conducted. Copy of this report provided to the facility.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 17, 2025 · control 29-AS-20240603180222

20242 state visits · 2 documents

Jun 5, 2024Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kelly Dulek arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct a required annual visit. Upon arrival, LPA met with Operations Manager Angelica Arambulo. Entrance interview conducted. At 01:27PM, the LPA, along with facility staff, toured the physical plant areas inside and outside to ensure there are no health and safety hazards and facility is in compliance with Title 22 Regulations. The following was observed: RECORD REVIEW: LPA reviewed staff and resident files for documents including, but not limited to: physician's report, Admission Agreements, personal rights, staff fingerprint background clearance, TB test results and health screenings. 1 (one) staff (Staff #1 - S1) did not have proof of fingerprint background clearance, but has been working for the facility since April 2024. Additional items observed will be addressed during the annual continuation visit. RESIDENT ROOMS/RESTROOMS: Resident rooms are either single or double occupancy. 10 (ten) resident rooms were observed during today's visit and contained the appropriate furnishings, linens, and bedding. Resident restrooms are jack-and-jill style - shared between 2 adjacent rooms. Restrooms observed were clean and sanitary in operating condition. Water temperature was tested in a sample of resident restrooms and measured at 86.4 degrees Fahrenheit in one resident restroom. Other remaining resident water temperatures were within the required range. COMMON AREAS: Laundry room door lock and staff room door lock were observed to both be broken at the time of the visit. Laundry detergent was observed to be accessible in the laundry room and staff belongings, which included visible medications, among other personal belongings were also accessible to residents in care. Report Continued on LIC 809-C BUILDINGS AND GROUNDS: During facility tour, LPA noted that all exterior gates are padlocked and/or chained and locked. Facility staff stated that the cameras were being repaired and in the meantime, gates were locked for resident safety. Operations Manager stated that if the gates are locked, this should be approved in the fire clearance. Review of facility plan of operation and fire clearance documents are unclear whether locked perimeter is approved. Further investigation is needed to determine if a violation occurred. LPA will address this during the annual continuation visit. Due to time constraints, LPA will return at a later date to continue the annual inspection. The following deficiencies were observed (See LIC 809-D) and cited from the California Code of Regulations, Title 22 and California Health and Safety Code. A $500 civil penalty was assessed. Failure to correct the deficiencies may result in additional civil penalties. Exit interview conducted. A copy of today's report and appeal rights were provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 5, 2024
Jan 25, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff are not properly trained to administer residents’ medications.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Esther Cortez conducted a subsequent complaint visit for the above allegations. Upon arrival, LPA met with staff and was explained the reason for the visit. Office Manager Angelica arrived at the facilty at approximately 12:00 p.m. On 1/09/2024, between 03:30 p.m. and 4:55 p.m., the LPA interviewed the Office Manager, staff, two residents, and obtained copies of resident records and other pertinent documents relevant to the investigation. During today's inspection, between 10:15 a.m. and 5:30 p.m., the LPA conducted a file review, interviewed the Office Manager, staff, residents, conducted a tour of the physical plant and obtained copies of resident records and other pertinent documents relevant to the investigation. Report will contiue on LIC9099-C. Substantiated It is alleged that the ‘Staff are not properly trained to administer residents’ medications. The concern of the RP is that employees are asked to give medicines to residents, but the employees are not certified to pass the medicine. To investigate the allegation LPA Cortez interviewed staff, the Office Manager, and conducted a file review. Staff interviews revealed that caregivers pass out medications to residents when there is no MedTech (MT) available. The Administrator stated that the caregivers who pass out medications to residents when the MedTechs are not available have been trained by one of the facilities MedTechs on how to pass the medication. However, there was no documentation on medication training available for the LPA to review for the caregivers that are passing out medications. On 1/09/24, during the initial 10-day complaint visit the Office Manager provided the LPA a certification of completion of 24 hours medication training program for four (4) MedTech’s at the facility. One out of the four MT’s no longer works at the facility. Furthermore, the certificates do not have any additional information other than the instructor’s signature. The Administrator stated that a pharmacist had come out to give the medication training, however could not provide additional information of the consultant such as the address, and telephone number of the consultant, the date when consultation was provided, the consultant’s organization affiliation, if any, and any educational and professional qualifications specific to medication management and, the training topics for which consultation was provided. Based on the information gathered through the interviews and documentation the allegation is Substantiated at this time. During the visit Office Manager Angelica Arambulo left the facility and assigned MedTech Dora Islas to review and sign the report. Per California Code of Regulations (CCR), Title 22, see LIC 9099-D for deficiencies cited. . A copy of the report was issued, along with appeal rights. It is alleged that a ‘Resident sustained unexplained bruising’. The concern of the RP is that a resident sustained bruising and the RP does not think anyone reported this information. During this investigation LPA Cortez conducted interviews with Resident #1, facility staff, and a family member of the resident. In addition, R1’s medical records and facility records were reviewed. Information revealed that R1 had an un-witnessed fall in the room on 10/20/23, was taken to hospital for evaluation. Facility submitted an Unusual Incident/Injury Report (LIC624) to CCL on 10/22/23. R1 was diagnosed with a fall, contusions, facial hematoma, and dementia. The bruises could be from that fall. The general information also states the risk of falling is higher in older people, R1 ambulates most of the time. During LPA's interview with R1, it was learned that R1 is confused and cannot hold a conversation. There is no indication or evidence identified that R1 may have been physically abused. Interview with R1's family indicates that they are happy with the care being provided to R1 and have no concerns at this time. R1 is still residing at the same facility. Based on the information gathered through the interviews and file review there is insufficient evidence to support the above allegation. Therefore, although the allegation may have happened, or may be valid, this allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. It is alleged that the ‘Facility is not supplying adequate food service’. The concern of the RP is that residents are not being provided snacks at night when asked for and are given hard bread. LPA Cortez interviewed residents, staff, and Office Manager, and conducted a tour of the kitchen. Interview with residents revealed that residents are being provided with snacks if requested. Residents stated that they also have snacks in their rooms. Interviews with facility staff revealed that snacks are available for residents such as fruit, yellow, and yogurt. Furthermore, staff stated that sandwiches and other items such as apple sauce are left in the staff refrigerator at night in case there’s residents that request food after the kitchen is closed. Interview with the Office Manager revealed that residents are provided with three meals a day, and two snacks, and additional snacks during activities. The administrator also stated that most residents don’t typically ask for food at night, however that staff is aware of what residents may be up at night wondering and have snacks available for them. During the tour of the kitchen, the LPA observed the refrigerator stocked with vegetables, fruit, yogurt, ice cream, milk, juice, and other foods. The freezer was stocked with frozen meats, and other frozen foods. Based on the information gathered through the interviews and observations there is insufficient evidence to support the claim that residents are not provided with adequate food service. Therefore, although the allegation may have happened, or may be valid, this allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. Report will continue on LIC9099-C... It is alleged that the ‘Staff failed to provide a comfortable environment for residents’. The concern of the RP is that residents wear bibs to clean their faces, but when they do the laundry, they wash the bibs with the mop's rugs, and that residents are dressed in clothes not appropriate for the weather. Furthermore, it was alleged that resident #2 always gets cold water in the house. To investigate the allegation LPA Cortez interviewed residents, staff, and conducted a tour of the laundry room and R2’s room. Residents stated that they are treated well at the facility and have no concerns. Staff interviews revealed that bibs are not washed with the mop’s rugs and that residents are dressed in sweaters and jackets during the cold weather. The LPA observed residents wearing sweaters/jackets and observed some residents also with blankets. During the tour of the laundry room, the LPA observed bibs in the washing machine, however the LPA did not observe any mop’s rugs in the washing machine with bibs. Lastly, at 1:18 p.m. the LPA measured the hot water in R2’s restroom at 115.5 degrees Fahrenheit. Based on the information gathered through the interviews and observations there is insufficient evidence to support the above allegation. Therefore, although the allegation may have happened, or may be valid, this allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. During the visit Office Manager Angelica Arambulo left the facility and assigned MedTech Dora Islas to review and sign the report. Exit interview conducted and report was issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 25, 2024 · control 29-AS-20240103113700

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: HSC 1569.69 · Plan of correction due date: Feb 8, 2024

§1569.69(a) (1) In facilities licensed to provide care for 16 or more persons, the employee shall complete 24 hours of initial training. This training shall consist of 16 hours of hands-on shadowing training,...and 8 hours of other training or instruction,... This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews, the licensee failed to comply with the section cited above as caregivers without complete medication training are passing medications, & training consultants inormation was not available which poses a potential health and safety risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 25, 2024

Plan of correction: Administrator will provide a Statement of Understanding of the regulation 1569.69 and write a commitment/plan to ensure staff will not assist with medication management until they are fully trained. And provide the Pharmacist consultants information, who trained the MTs, to LPA by 2/08/24.

Earlier years2021 to 2023 · 17 documents

20235 state visits · 7 documents

Sep 22, 2023Facility evaluation reportCase Management - IncidentDeficiency page: Type A

Type of visit: Case Management - Incident

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Esther Cortez conducted an unannounced Case Management - Incident visit to the facility. The LPA was greeted by Staff Catalina Gonzalez and informed them of the reason for the visit. Office Manger Angelica Arambulo was unable to be at the facility during today’s visit and authorized Catalina Gonzales to sign and receive the report. The purpose of today's visit is to address a self reported Unusual Incident/Injury Report (LIC 624) reported to CCL on 09/19/2023. The self reported Unusual Incident/Injury Report (LIC 624) pertains to an incident that occurred on 9/06/2023 regarding Residents #1 (R1), two staff (S1, S2), and a visitor. It was documented that on the evening of 9/6/2023 R1 did not want to be changed and S1 asked a visitor to hold R1, then S1 and S2 continued to to change R1 in front of the visitor, violating R1's personal rights. It was further reported that R1 had been combative due to not being provided their 1 p.m. and 5 p.m. medications by S1. S1 was terminated on 9/06/2023. Pursuant to Title 22 of the CA Code of Regulations, the following deficiency was cited (refer to 809-D). Exit interview conducted. Copy of report and appeal rights issued at the time of the visit.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 22, 2023

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87468.1(a)(3) · Plan of correction due date: Sep 29, 2023

87468.1Personal Rights of Residents in All Facilities (a)(3)To be free from punishment, humiliation, intimidation, abuse, or other actions...interfering with daily living functions such as eating, sleeping, or elimination.This requirement is not met as evidence by: Based on Records obtained. The licensee did not comply with the above cited section as R1 was held down by a visitor and S1 and S2 changed R1 infront of the visitor which poses an immidiate personal rights risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 22, 2023

Plan of correction: Office Manager Angelica Arambulo terminated S1 on the day of the incident, and S2 will be given a write up. Ofifice Manager agress to conduct an all staff trainning on personal rights and submit proof to CCL by POC due date.

Sep 22, 2023Facility evaluation reportCase Management - IncidentReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Incident

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Esther Cortez conducted an unannounced subsequent Case Management - Incident visit to the above facility. The purpose of the visit is to conclude an investigation initiated by LPA during a Case Management- Incident visit conducted on 08/17/2023. The LPA was greeted by Staff Catalina Gonzalez and informed them of the reason for the visit. Office Manger Angelica Arambulo was unable to be at the facility during today’s visit and authorized Catalina Gonzales to sign and receive the report. The self reported Unusual Incident/Injury Report (LIC 624) pertains to an incident that occurred approximately the weekend of 8/07/2023 regarding Residents #1,2 and 3 (R1, R2, R3). On 8/17/2023, the LPA conducted interviews with two staff and four residents (R1, R2, R3, R4). The LPA interviewed the Office Manager Angelica Arambula throughout the visit. At 10:45 a.m. the LPA reviewed facility records and obtained copies of pertinent records. It was reported that staff (S1, S2) was witnessed hitting R1, R2, R3. On 8/17/2023 Office Manager Angelica Arambula stated that both staff had been suspended. Although a violation of Title 22 of the CA Code of Regulations was noted, the deficiency was cited on a separate report from a case-management visit on 9/22/2023. Exit interview conducted. Copy of report and appeal rights issued at the time of the visit.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 22, 2023
Aug 17, 2023Facility evaluation reportCase Management - IncidentReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Incident

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Esther Cortez conducted an unannounced Case Management - Incident inspection pertaining to a self reported Unusual Incident/Injury Report (LIC 624) received on 08/17/2023. The LPA was greeted by Med Tech Dora Islas and informed them of the reason for the visit. Office Manger Angelica Arambulo arrived shortly. The self reported Unusual Incident/Injury Report (LIC 624) pertains to an incident that occurred approximately the weekend of 8/07/2023 regarding Residents #1,2 and 3 (R1, R2, R3). During today's inspection, the LPA conducted interviews with two staff and four residents (R1, R2, R3, R4). The LPA interviewed the Office Manager Angelica Arambula throughout the visit. At 10:45 a.m. the LPA reviewed facility records and obtained copies of pertinent records. No immediate health and safety concerns were observed during today's inspection. The LPA has determined further investigation is needed. The report was issued to Office Manager Angelica Arambula.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 17, 2023
Aug 17, 2023Facility evaluation reportCase Management - Annual ContinuationReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Annual Continuation

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Esther Cortez conducted an unannounced Annual Continuation Visit to the facility to continue the annual inspection visit initiated on 06/15/2023. The LPA was greeted by Med Tech Dora Islas and informed them of the reason for the visit. Office Manger Angelica Arambulo arrived shortly. Today the LPA conducted a file review, a medication audit, four (4) resident and three (3) staff interviews. Record Review: At 10:45 a.m. a review of facility files was initiated. The LPA reviewed five (5) out of sixteen (16) Resident Files. The following was noted: Resident #1’s (R1’s) file was observed to be missing their functional capability assessment, R2’s file was observed to be missing a preplacement appraisal, and R3 and R4’s file was observed to be missing their personal rights (LIC613). The LPA reviewed five (5) of twenty-one (21) staff files. The following was noted: One staff (S1) file out of five was observed to be missing a first aid certificate, health screening, and documentation of Tuberculosis. Four out of five staff files (S1, S2, S3, S4) were missing four hours of training which shall be specific to postural supports, restricted health conditions and hospice care. The LPA observed documentation of Infection Control, Disaster prevention and last fire drill (conducted on 5/26/2023). The LPA obtained Resident and Staff Rosters. Medications: At 1:30 p.m. a medications review was initiated. The following was observed: R1’s Expiration date and date filled for Nifedipine ER did not match the Facility Centrally Stored Medication and Destruction Record (CSMDR), R2’s expiration date and date filled for Losartan POT and Memantine HCL did not match the CSMDR, and R3’s CSMDR records were observed to be missing. R3’s Risperidone medication was counted in front of the LPA and was observed to have three more pills than needed based on the quantity on the medication’s label, in addition on the Medication Administration Record, medication for August 14, 2023 was unaccounted for. Upon observation, Med Tech Dora initiated correcting all of the missing information for residents (R1,R2, and R3). Interviews: During the visit the LPA conducted four (4) resident Interviews and three staff interviews Pursuant to Title 22 of the CA Code of Regulations, the following deficiencies were cited (refer to LIC 809-D): Exit interview conducted and copy of the report and appeal rights provided to Office Manager Angelica.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 17, 2023
Jun 15, 2023Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

At 10:20 a.m. Licensing Program Analysts (LPA) Esther Cortez arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct a required annual visit. The LPA was greeted by Administrative Assistant Erendira Guadarrama and informed them of the reason for the visit. Office Manger Angelica Arambulo arrived shortly. At 10:40 a.m. the LPA conducted a tour of the physical plant with Administrative Assistant Guadarrama and Office Manager Arambulo to ensure there are no health and safety hazards and facility is in compliance with Title 22 Regulations. The following was noted: Facility is a single-story residence that consists of twenty-five (25) resident bedrooms (thirteen (13) being occupied by residents), one (1) staff room, sixteen (16) bathrooms and four (4) shower rooms. The LPA observed fire extinguishers throughout the facility, which were fully charged and last serviced 11/14/2022. All smoke alarms and carbon monoxide detectors were tested and functioned properly during time of visit. LPA observed all required postings in the entrance area. Kitchen: During the facility tour, at 10:46 a.m. the LPA observed the kitchen to be kept inaccessible to the residents. The kitchen appeared clean and the appliances and fixtures functional during the time of visit. LPA observed a sufficient amount of perishable and non-perishable food at the facility. The LPA observed food containers not properly labeled with no expiration dates in the kitchen. At 11:05 a.m. the LPA observed the following expired food in the pantry: - One (1) Sesame Oil with the expiration date of 07/23/2022 - One (1) Pad Thai Sauce with the expiration date of 7/31/2022 - One (1) box of Stevia Sweetener with the expiration date of 12/01/2022 - One (1) Powdered Pure Cane Sugar bag with the expiration date of 11/2022 - One (1) Distilled White Vinegar bottle wit the expiration date of 7/24/2022 Report will continue on LIC809-C The Administrative Assistant stated they will discard all expired food today and properly label all food containers with expiration dates. There was a sufficient supply of cooking and dining ware. There were no visible immediate hazards observed. Bedrooms: The resident bedrooms were properly furnished with at least one chair, night-stand and sufficient lighting for each resident. The bedrooms had appropriate and adequate bedding and linens such as sheets, pillowcases, mattress pads, and blankets. At 11:45 a.m. the LPA observed room #406 (not bedridden cleared) who was documented to have a bedridden resident on the resident roster. After observation the administrative assistant stated that resident #1 (R1) was not bedridden and resident roster had not been updated. The LPA verified with R1'S Physician report to not be bedridden but non-ambulatory. Bathrooms: At 11:36 a.m., the LPA observed the bathroom between rooms #101 and #103, with no trash can lid. At 11:41 a.m., the LPA observed the restroom between rooms #406 and #408 with a broken cabinet door in the bottom right of the sink. At 11:44 a.m., the LPA observed the bathroom between rooms #409 and #411, with no trash can lid, a toilet plunger over the sink, a walker next to the toilet and a wheelchair in front of the sink. At 12:08 p.m., the LPA observed the bathroom between rooms #402 and #404 with no trash can available. The office manager designated a staff personnel to clear the restrooms of any items and showed the LPA the new trash can with lid they had purchased for residents bathrooms. The LPA observed grab bars and non-skid tiles in all bathrooms. Residents have sufficient amounts of supplies for personal hygiene. At 12:05 p.m., water temperature in the bathroom between rooms #302 and #304 was measured at 97.2 degrees Fahrenheit. At 12:16 p.m., water temperature in room #105's restroom was measured at 99.2 degrees Fahrenheit. The water measured was not within the required limit of 105-120 degrees Fahrenheit. Office Manager delegated staff to adjust the hot water upon observation. Common Areas: These included the, hallways, living room and dining area. The common areas were checked for cleanliness and furniture was checked for functionality during time of visit. There is a television, piano, puzzles and other indoor activities available for resident use. The facility maintained a comfortable temperature of 71 degrees. At 11:16 a.m., the LPA observed a rolling cart being used as a door stopper and blocking the door exit next to the kitchen leading to the outside patio. Administrative Assistant removed the rolling cart upon observation and LPA discussed safety hazards with them. They later found out that a resident had placed the cart at the door. Report will continue on LIC809-C At 11:28 a.m., the LPA observed a wooden rolling physical activity cart more than 5 feet in height blocking the exit door between rooms #209 and #207. Office Manager delegated staff to move the wooden cart to another location upon observation. LPA discussed safety hazards with the Administrative Assistant. Surrounding Grounds (Outdoors): The LPA observed appropriate outdoor furniture, with a covered shaded area for residents. Parking is available for residents and visitors. There are no bodies of water on the premises. Pursuant to Title 22 Division 6 Chapter 8 of the CA Code of Regulations, the following deficiencies were cited (refer to LIC 809-D): Due to time constraints the LPA will return to complete the annual at a later date.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 15, 2023

The state marks this report as 5 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 4. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.

Mar 6, 2023Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff failed to provide timely medical attention Lack of supervision resulted in fracture

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Ashley Smith arrived unannounced to issue the findings for the above allegations. The LPA met with staff Endy Guadarrama and explained the reason for the visit. On 11/10/2022, the Department received a complaint, which alleged that staff failed to seek timely medical attention for Resident #1 (R1) after R1 suffered a fall. Community Care Licensing Division’s Investigation’s Branch (IB) Investigator Heidy Bendana was assigned to the case. On 11/15/2022, the LPA conducted the initial visit, and the LPA toured the facility, reviewed video footage at 11:55 a.m., and interviewed staff at 9:35 a.m., 9:50 a.m., 11:11 a.m., and 11:40 a.m. Investigator Bendana obtained facility video footage on 12/08/2022, interviewed three (3) staff members on 12/08/2022, interviewed R1’s responsible party on 1/12/2023 and 1/24/2023; interviewed a hospice nurse on 1/12/2023; and, interviewed two (2) staff members on 1/12/2023. Investigator Bendana obtained and reviewed medical records pertinent to the case. Substantiated CONT - PAGE 2 Regarding the allegation: Staff failed to provide timely medical attention It was alleged that staff failed to obtain timely medical attention for R1. Records review revealed that R1 was admitted to the facility on 07/05/2022 with hospice services, with the admitting diagnosis of metastatic cancer, hypertension, and dementia. Prior to admission to the facility, R1 was hospitalized and was diagnosed with lung cancer that had metastasized to the bone. Medical records indicated that R1 had multiple malignant masses throughout R1’s right lung, one of which that had progressively increased in size. As a result, R1’s appraisal dated 07/10/2022 noted that R1 was in ‘constant pain’ due to the masses. The investigation revealed that R1 suffered an unwitnessed fall in the facility courtyard on 11/05/2022. The staff whom assisted R1 after R1’s fall claimed that R1 was checked for immediate injuries and then placed back in their wheelchair. Staff mentioned that R1 sustained a cut on their forehead and mentioned that R1’s forehead hurt. Another staff whom assisted R1 indicated that R1 complained of hip pain. Staff reported that they informed the House Manager via phone and left a handwritten note, indicating that R1 had fallen. Interviews with the House Manager confirmed that staff had called them the evening of 11/05/2022 and reported R1’s fall; yet, the House Manager admitted that they notified the hospice agency and R1’s responsible party of R1’s fall the next morning, 11/06/2022. Staff indicated that they had assumed that R1 was ‘ok’ and did not require immediate medical attention. A hospice nurse assessed R1 on 11/06/2022. Interviews with the hospice nurse revealed that R1’s vitals and heart was checked. Although the nurse claimed that they checked R1’s range of motion, additional witnesses stated that R1 had complained of hip pain during the assessment. The information obtained from the hospice nurse supported claims that they recalled R1 expressing pain; however, they did not recall where the pain was located. The LPA also reviewed facility charting notes regarding R1. It was documented on 11/06/2022 that R1 ‘had some swelling on [R1’s] left temple area and scrape… no visible injuries on [R1’s] body but appears to have pain on [R1’s] left side, left shoulder particularly.’ Staff interviews and R1’s appraisal dated 07/10/2022 stated that R1 was ‘always’ in pain due to R1’s tumor. R1’s responsible party indicated that R1’s cancer was in their chest and had spread to their lungs. Yet, records review and interview revealed that R1’s hip pain was unrelated to R1’s cancer diagnosis. Records and interviews confirmed that R1 suffered another unwitnessed fall in R1’s room on either 11/06/2022 or on 11/07/2022 at approximately 4:00 a.m. CONT - PAGE 3 R1 was placed back into bed. Staff claimed R1 was ‘crying in pain’ when R1 lifted their arms and chose to contact hospice. Whereas hospice wanted to send a nurse, staff indicated that R1’s responsible party wanted R1 to be sent to the hospital. On 11/07/2022, R1’s responsible party took R1 to the hospital. Upon admission to the hospital, it was discovered that R1 sustained a left hip fracture. R1 did not return to the facility. Based on the investigation, there is sufficient evidence to support claims that the facility failed to provide timely medical attention for R1. R1 suffered two unwitnessed falls and complained of pain. Facility staff felt they fulfilled their due diligence by contacting the hospice agency regarding R1’s fall. As directed per regulation, the facility is expected to notify R1’s hospice agency instead of calling 9-1-1 if R1 was experiencing an emergency that was directly related to the expected course of R1’s terminal illness. R1 was receiving hospice services due to their terminal diagnosis of cancer and dementia. R1 fell on two occasions and was experiencing hip pain. This pain was not directly related to the reason as to why R1 was admitted to hospice. The allegation, ‘staff failed to provide timely medical attention’ was Substantiated at this time. Regarding the allegation: Lack of supervision resulted in R1 sustaining a fracture It was alleged that staff failed to supervise R1, which resulted in R1 falling and sustaining a fracture. Records review revealed that R1 was admitted to the facility on 07/05/2022 with hospice services, with the admitting diagnosis of metastatic cancer, hypertension, and dementia. R1’s physician’s report dated 7/7/2022 stated that R1 had an unsteady gait, had auditory and visual impairment, needed assistance to transfer to and from bed, exhibited confusion and wandering behavior, and required assistance with all aspects of care besides feeding oneself. Staff claimed that R1 ambulated with a wheelchair and stated they would have to remind R1 to utilize their wheelchair when ambulating through the facility. Staff stated that R1 would oftentimes get out of their wheelchair and use it as a walker. Medical records dated 07/01/2022 indicated that prior to R1 being admitted to the facility, R1 was deemed a fall risk due to R1’s mental status and condition. R1 suffered an un-witnessed fall in the facility courtyard on 11/05/2022. Staff interviews stated that R1 would regularly sit out on the courtyard after dinner. Staff claimed when they put R1 out on the courtyard, they told R1 ‘not to get up’ and said they left R1 alone because there were cameras in the courtyard. CONT - PAGE 4 A review of facility camera footage confirmed that at approximately 4:48 p.m. on 11/05/2022, R1 was observed sitting in their wheelchair in the courtyard .R1 was observed to be alone, and the footage did not capture staff ‘making rounds’ or checking in on R1. The camera footage skips to 5:48 p.m., where R1 is seen laying on their side in the courtyard, shoes scattered above their head, and two caregivers were lifting R1 up into the wheelchair. As the camera footage jumps from the time stamp of 4:48 p.m. to 5:48 p.m., one is unable to determine the time in which R1 fell, or the time that staff found R1 on the ground. Records and interviews confirmed that R1 suffered another un-witnessed fall in R1’s room on either 11/06/2022 or on 11/07/2022 at approximately 4:00 a.m. R1 was placed back into bed. Per the interviews conducted, there was no indication that staff implemented any fall precautions to decrease the likelihood of R1 suffering a fall at the facility. Although the Administrator claimed that R1 had a pendant and call button to ask for assistance, the investigation revealed that R1 did not wear a pendant while residing at the facility. There was no additional evidence to confirm whether R1 had a fall mat, bed alarm, or other fall prevention measures in place. Whereas the Administrator indicated that the facility did not provide 1:1 care, information obtained from other staff interviews revealed that staff believed that R1 either required 24-hour supervision, or 1:1 care. Whereas R1’s hospice nurse did not deny R1’s need for 1:1 care, it was communicated that R1 did not ‘necessarily need’ 1:1 care. R1’s family member also indicated that R1 required 1:1 care but knew R1 was not receiving 1:1 care when R1 resided at the facility. Based on the information obtained in interviews, observations, and records review, there is sufficient evidence to support the claim that due to lack of supervision, R1 suffered a fall and subsequently sustained a fracture. Staff stated they left R1 in the courtyard alone because there were ‘cameras in the courtyard’. Multiple staff stated that R1 either required 1:1 care or 24-hour care. Lastly, the facility did not implement fall preventative measures to lessen the likelihood of R1 sustaining a fall. This allegation is deemed Substantiated at this time. Per California Code of Regulations (CCR), Title 22, see LIC 9099-D for deficiencies cited. An immediate civil penalty of $500 is also assessed. The licensee was informed that a civil penalty might be assessed based on the Health and Safety Code 1569.49(e) or (f), or 1548(e) or (f), 1568.0822(e) or (f). Exit interview conducted. A copy of the report was issued, along with appeal rights.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 6, 2023 · control 29-AS-20221110164437

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87469(c)(3) · Plan of correction due date: Mar 8, 2023

87469(c)(3) Advanced Directives and Requests Regarding Resuscitative Measures. … For emergencies not directly related to the expected course of the resident’s terminal illness, the facility staff shall immediately telephone emergency response (9-1-1). This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on the investigation, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above, as the facility did not call 9-1-1 and instead called R1's hospice agency after R1 fell and was in pain, even though the pain was unrelated to the terminal illness, which poses an immediate health and safety risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 6, 2023

Plan of correction: The Administrator agreed to do the following: 1. Submit a Statement of Understanding, explaining the steps the facility will follow to avoid similar issues from happening again and to ensure compliance to Title 22 Regulations regarding emergency medical assistance for residents receiving hospice services.

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87468.2(a)(4) · Plan of correction due date: Mar 8, 2023

87468.2(a)(4) Additional Personal Rights of Residents in Privately Operated Facilities. Residents shall have all of the following....: To care, supervision, and services that meet their individual needs and are delivered by staff that are sufficient in numbers, qualifications, and competency to meet their needs. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on the investigation, licensee did not comply with the section cited above, as staff did not provide adequate supervision, resulting in R1 falling and sustaining injuries, which poses an immediate health and safety risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 6, 2023

Plan of correction: The Administrator agreed to do the following: 1. Submit a Plan of Action, detailing how staff are trained to respond to resident falls (witnessed and unwitnessed). In addition, detail the facility's protocol surrounding fall prevention. Submit protocol to CCL no later than 03/08/2023. 2. Review the protocol with all staff. Submit the sign-in sheet and all applicable documents to CCLD no later than 03/13/2023. A civil penalty in the amount of $500 is assessed.

Feb 6, 2023Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility did not inform responsible party regarding change in resident’s physical therapy

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Olson conducted a subsequent complaint visit to deliver findings for the above allegation. LPA met with Joy Ward-Michayluk, Administrstor. Concerns were that the facility did not inform resident #1 (R1)’s responsible party regarding change in resident’s physical therapy to Innerjoy Home Health. On 7/14/21 starting at 10:53 am interviews were conducted with staff, Administrator and residents. On 7/29/22 starting at 10:55 am interviews were conducted with resident family members. On 8/10/21 starting at 1:59 pm interviews were conducted with staff from Los Robles Home Care Services and staff from Doctor Steven Barr’s office. On 8/12/21 starting at 9:40 am interview was conducted with Licensee/Representative. Interview with Administrator revealed that R1’s responsible person did not want R1 to see any other physician besides Doctor Barr. Administrator stated that Doctor Barr was still R1’s physician. Interview with staff revealed that when Doctor Masongsong came to the facility in October 2020 they were using Inner Joy Health Home. Staff stated that they used to use Assisted Home Health and Los Robles Home Health. Contined on 9099-C Substantiated Interview with R2’s family member stated that they were not made aware of any physical therapy order for R2 until they received a phone call from a nurse at Heart 2 Home Health stating that they saw R2 that day. Interview with Los Robles Home Care Services staff revealed that R1 was discharged from PT on 12/4/19. Interview with R1’s physician’s office revealed that they did not refer R1 for physical therapy in 2020. Interview with Licensee/Representative revealed that Dr. Masongsong is the doctor that goes to their facility to see their residents. Licensee/Representative stated that Dr. Masongsong refers residents to Innerjoy Home Health as well as other places. A review of R1’s records on 7/28/22 starting at 12:52 pm revealed that R1’s Health Insurance approved Physical Therapy for R1 on 2/18/19, 2/25/19 and 11/13/19 with Los Robles Home Care Services. On 11/10/2020 facility staff faxed R1’s physician requesting a doctor order for physical therapy. Facility received an order for physical therapy to evaluate and treat R1 on 11/10/2020. On 11/24/2020 R1’s responsible party received notification of denial of medical coverage from their Health Insurance which indicated that Inner Joy Home Health asked if they could have physical therapy services and they are a non-contracted provider. They denied the request and approved PT services with a contracted provider Los Robles Home Care Services. A review of R2’s records revealed that on 3/20/21 Dr. Masongsong ordered HH (Innerjoy) to evaluate R2 for physical therapy. Based on the information obtained during the investigation, the allegation that the facility did not inform responsible party regarding change in resident’s physical therapy is substantiated at this time. Pursuant to Title 22 Division 6 Chapter 8 of the CA Code of Regulations, the following deficiency was cited (refer to LIC 9099-D): Exit interview conducted, reports and appeal rights were reviewed and printed.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 6, 2023 · control 29-NP-20210709071914

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: HSC 1569.269(a)(20) · Plan of correction due date: Feb 13, 2023

1569.269(a)(20) Enumerated rights; severability. To select their own physicians, pharmacies, privately paid personal assistants, hospice agency... in a manner that is consistent with the resident’s contract of admission or other rules of the facility, and in accordance with this act. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews and record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above as the licensee requested a change in Physical Therapist companies without prior notification to responsible parties which posed a potential personalthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 6, 2023

Plan of correction: Administrator agreed to submit a statement of understanding of 1569.269(a)(20) to CCL by 2/13/2023 rights risk to persons in care.

20223 state visits · 3 documents

Jun 22, 2022Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kelly Dulek arrived unannounced to conduct a required annual visit, which has an emphasis on infection control practices and procedures. The LPA met with Licensee Evangeline (Joy) Michayluk and informed them of the reason for the visit. At 09:20AM, the LPA and Licensee toured the physical plant areas inside and outside to ensure there are no health and safety hazards and community is in compliance with Title 22 Regulations. Common Areas: There were no obstructions and/or tripping hazards throughout the facility. The facility maintains a comfortable temperature throughout the building. There are fire extinguishers throughout the facility, which were fully charged and last serviced 11/16/2021. The LPA observed staff engaging residents in group activities. All common spaces appeared clean and in good repair. At 09:21AM, the Storage closet, which contains Shampoo & Body Wash, Peri-Rinse, and other personal care items was observed to be unlocked and accessible to residents in care. At 09:42AM, the Linen Closet containing Shampoo & Body Wash, Peri-Rinse, Jergens body lotion, Dove Body Wash, incontinence care cart, and other personal care items was observed to be unlocked and accessible to residents in care. Kitchen: The facility had a sufficient supply of two-day perishable and seven-day nonperishable food at the time of the visit. Food is prepared based on the menu and modified as needed for individual residents. Administrator stated a large monthly food order will be delivered Monday and perishable foods are purchased as needed throughout the month. Snacks and beverages are available for residents at all times. Outside areas: The LPA observed appropriate outdoor furniture, with a covered shaded area for residents. Parking is available for residents and visitors. Resident Rooms: The facility is a one story building. Resident rooms can be designated for either single or double occupancy. All resident rooms have either a private restroom or a "jack and jill" restroom shared with Report Continued on LIC 809-C the adjoining room. At 09:35AM, water temperature in room #105's restroom was measured at 99.8 degrees Fahrenheit. At 09:40AM, water temperature in the"jack and jill" restroom between rooms #103 and #101 was measured at 102.5 degrees Fahrenheit. Administrator indicated the water heater was replaced yesterday and had been set to 120 degrees Fahrenheit. Record Review: At 11:26AM, LPA reviewed records for three (3) residents for documents including but not limited to Physican's Report and Appraisal Needs and Service Plan. One (1) of three (3) residents, who has a diagnosis of Dementia, had a physician's report dated 04/07/2021. Infection Control: Prior to entry to the facility, there is a central entry point for symptom screening and temperature checks for staff, and visitors. Staff and visitors were observed wearing appropriate face coverings throughout the visit. During today’s visit, the LPA spoke with the Administrator regarding the community's infection control practices. The community has an adequate supply of Personal Protection Equipment (PPE) and is able to obtain additional supplies. The community's cleaning protocol is sufficient. This facility has records of staff and resident vaccinations. If needed, the facility has the capacity to designate isolation rooms if there is a confirmed case of COVID-19, as well as a COVID-19 wing. The facility has previously managed COVID-19 active cases and the facility complied with all requirements set forth by the local health department and licensing. Staff are up to date regarding guidelines pertaining to visitation and vaccine requirements. The community's policies and procedures pertaining to infection control were adequate. Pursuant to Title 22 Division 6 Chapter 8 of the CA Code of Regulations, the following deficiencies were cited (refer to LIC 809-D): Exit interview conducted, todays reports, and appeal rights were reviewed and emailed to the Licensee.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 22, 2022
May 17, 2022Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility failed to meet the needs of the residents Facility has insufficient staffing

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Angel Ascencio conducted an unannounced subsequent visit to deliver the final findings to the above facility. LPA met with Administrative Assistant Endy Guadarrama at 1:02 p.m. Administrator Evangeline Michayluk is unavailable due to family emergency. Entrance interview conducted. The Woodland Hills North Regional Office (RO) received a complaint on 03/18/2022 alleging that facility staff are failing to meet the needs of the residents and facility has insufficient staffing. On 03/23/2022 LPA Ascencio conducted staff interviews starting at 12:40 PM. During the staff interviews, it was revealed that they always work a four-two-four (4-2-4) schedule with 2 staff members scheduled daily. Further interviews revealed that the facility is using an outside agency ACE Compassionate Care, to assist when staffing needs are low. Continued on LIC 9099 - C Unsubstantiated LPA Ascencio received February and March 2022 staffing schedule. Review of the schedules revealed that there has been 2 staff members for the 1st shift (7:00 a.m. – 3:00 p.m.), 2 staff members for the 2nd shift (3:00 p.m. – 11:00 p.m.) and 2 staff members for the 3rd shift (11:00 p.m. – 7:00 a.m.). Further staff interviews also revealed that Resident #1 (R1) moved in early March 2022 and has had a hard time adjusting to the facility. When R1 moved in, they would wander within the community screaming and yelling for help. Staff would intervene and attempt to redirect with some days more successful than others. Continued staff interviews also revealed that they have cameras throughout the facility and when R1 yells for help, they notice on the cameras that R1 is not in any immediate danger. Further staff interviews also revealed that staff use various methods of interventions to redirect R1 including a calm demeanor, creative verbal responses and meaningful activities. One of the last interventions for R1 is the use of medication, which they are prescribed for agitation. Interview with R1 starting at approximately 2:10 p.m. on 03/23/2022 revealed that they like the place they currently live at. R1 also mentioned that they do not have a problem with any staff or residents in the facility. Further interview with R1 also revealed that they do not yell for help, they just let the staff know what they need and that the staff are good and treat them nice. Based on file review and staff and resident interviews, the allegations; Facility failed to meet the needs of the residents and facility has insufficient staffing are deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. Exit interview conducted and copy of the report provided to admin via email.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 17, 2022 · control 29-AS-20220318084413
Apr 12, 2022Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility failed to provide or assist with arranging timely medical transportation

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Teresa Camara conducted a subsequent complaint visit to deliver findings on the above noted allegation. LPA met with administrator Joy Ward-Michayluk and explained the reason for the visit. LPA Camara had visited the facility on 09/03/2021 and conducted a plant tour at 10:25 a.m., reviewed records at 11:15 a.m., and interviewed Staff 1 (S1) at 12:40 p.m. and Staff 2 (S2) at 2:50 p.m. Resident 1 (R1) experienced severe abdominal pain on 08/26/2021. Staff called R1's doctor who asked for R1 to be sent to the hospital emergency room. Staff called R1's family who requested staff find free transportation for R1 rather than call 9-1-1. Staff indicated this was an emergency and there was not time to look for free transportation. After some back and forth with the family, staff called 9-1-1 to take R1 to the emergency room. Based on the records reviewed and staff interviews, this allegation is Unsubstantiated at this time. Exit interview conducted and a copy of the report was emailed to the administrator. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 12, 2022 · control 29-NP-20210826165010

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87303(c) · Plan of correction due date: Apr 25, 2022

87303(c) Personal Accommodations and Services. Individual privacy shall be provided in all toilet, bath and shower areas. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: LPA observed several resident bathrooms that lacked locks on bathroom doors. These are "Jack and Jill" style bathrooms where adjoining rooms use the same bathroom and can enter when someone else is using the bathroom, which poses a potential health and safety risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 12, 2022

Plan of correction: Administrator has already ensured that all bathrooms have locks. This was completed in September of 2021.

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87303(a)(3)(D) · Plan of correction due date: Apr 25, 2022

87307 Personal Accommodations and Services (a) Living accommodations and grounds shall be related to the facility's function. The facility shall be large enough to provide comfortable living accommodations and privacy for the residents, staff, and others who may reside in the facility. The following provisions shall apply: (3) Equipment and supplies necessary for personal care and maintenance of adequate hygiene practice shall be readily available to each resident. The resident may provide the following items; however, if the resident is unable or chooses not to provide them, the licensee shall assure provision of: (D) Hygiene items of general use such as soap andthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 12, 2022

Plan of correction: Administrator will provide training to staff to ensure resident bathrooms have adequate supply of personal hygiene items, including toilet paper and paper towels. Supplies will be limited to smaller amounts due to several residents clogging plumbing with excess paper supplies. Evidence of training will be provided to CCL by 4/19/22. toilet paper. This requirement was not met as evidenced by: LPA observed resident bathrooms which lacked toilet paper and paper towels, which is a potential health and safety risk to residents in care.

20214 state visits · 7 documents

Sep 3, 2021Facility evaluation reportCase Management - IncidentReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Incident

Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Teresa Camara and Kelly Dulek conducted an unannounced case management inspection due to a death report submitted to the Regional Office on 08/31/2021. LPAs met with Assistant Administrator Jennifer Sharma and explained the reason for the visit. Administrator Evangeline "Joy" Ward-Michayluk arrived at 11:15AM. The reason for today's inspection was to follow up on the death report for resident #1 (R1) received in the Regional Office on 08/31/2021. During today's inspection, the LPAs toured the facility at 10:28AM, conducted staff interviews between 11:40AM and 2:50PM, reviewed resident records at 11:20AM, and gathered copies of pertinent documents. At this time further investigation is needed. A exit interview was conducted with Evangeline "Joy" Ward-Michayluk, and a hard copy was provided via email.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 3, 2021
Sep 3, 2021Facility evaluation reportCase Management - DeficienciesDeficiency pages: Type A

Type of visit: Case Management - Deficiencies

Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Teresa Camara and Kelly Dulek conducted a Case Management-Deficiencies visit to issue citations for deficiencies observed during the investigation of complaint control #29-NP-20210826165010, unrelated to the complaint allegations. During the facility tour the LPAs conducted along with Assistant Administrator Jennifer Sharma at 10:28AM, LPAs observed an unlocked closet labeled "Telephone & Cable" at 10:32AM. Additionally, at 11:05AM, a resident restroom/toilet was observed to be dirty. Pursuant to Title 22, CA Code of Regulations, the following deficiencies were cited (refer to LIC 809-D). Exit interview conducted, report issued, and appeal rights provided via email.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 3, 2021

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87705 · Plan of correction due date: Sep 3, 2021

87705(f)(1) (f) The following shall be stored inaccessible to residents with dementia: (1) Knives, matches, firearms, tools and other items that could constitute a danger to the resident(s). This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on observation, during facility tour, a closet containing facility electrical equipment was observed to be unlocked and unable to be closed, which poses an immediate health and safety risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 3, 2021

Plan of correction: Administrator repaired the door during today's visit. LPAs confirmed the door closes and locks. POC cleared.

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR87303(a) · Plan of correction due date: Sep 6, 2021

87303 Maintenance and Operation (a) The facility shall be clean, safe, sanitary and in good repair at all times. Maintenance shall include provision of maintenance services and procedures for the safety and well-being of residents, employees and visitors. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on observation, during facility tour, resident restroom was observed to be dirty, which poses an immediate health risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 3, 2021

Plan of correction: The administrator ensured the resrtoom was cleaned during today's visit. Administrator will send a photo of cleaned toilet seat by POC due date.

Aug 11, 2021Facility evaluation reportPost LicensingDeficiency pages: Type B

Type of visit: Post Licensing

Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) JoAnn Rosales and KaSandra Lopez arrived at the facility to conduct a Post Licensing visit. LPA's observed a COVID-19 screening station outside of the facility and were assisted by staff Jennifer Sharma. LPA's toured the physical plant areas inside and outside to ensure there are no health and safety hazards and facility is in compliance with Title 22 Regulations. Today's evaluation included but was not limited to building and grounds, resident rooms, bathrooms, common areas, personal accommodations, hot water temperature (read at 113.7 and 114.5 degrees) in resident bathrooms, kitchen and food supplies. There is an adequate amount of perishable and nonperishable foods. LPA's observed fire extinguishers fully charged. Centrally stored medicines are kept in a locked medication room. First Aid kit is complete. Grab bars were present in the bathrooms. LPA observed appropriate and sufficient lighting in each room. Hygiene items are being provided. LPA's observed signal system which operates from each resident room. Carbon monoxide detectors were tested and operable. Administrator provided documentation of smoke detector test completed on 12/15/2020 with no defects found. Fire Alarm defects were found and were repaired and retested with no defects on 1/4/21. LPA's observed disaster plan posted hallway. LPA observed COVID-19 postings throughout the facility. LPA observed a 30 day supply of PPE. LPA reviewed a sampling of resident medications and records. LPA reviewed a sampling of staff records. During a review of resident records starting at 12:33 pm LPA's observed that resident #1 (R1), R2 and R3 do not have TB tests on file. LPA's observed that R3 and R4 do not have current physicians reports on file. During a review of staff records starting at 3:25 pm LPA observed that staff #1 (S1) and S2 do not have Continued on 809-C documented 40 hours of initial training on file. LPA observed that S1, S2 and S3 do not have a current first aid certificates on file. LPA observed that S4 does not have a health screening on file. Pursuant to Title 22 Division 6 Chapter 8 of the CA Code of Regulations, the following deficiencies were cited (refer to LIC 809-D): Exit interview conducted. Today's reports and appeal rights were reviewed and emailed to the Administrator.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 11, 2021

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87705(c)(5) · Plan of correction due date: Aug 20, 2021

87705 Care of Persons with Dementia (c)(5) Each resident with dementia shall have an annual medical assessment as specified in Section 87458, Medical Assessment, and a reappraisal done at least annually, both of which shall include a reassessment of the resident’s dementia care needs. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in 2 out of 6 resident records which poses a potential health and safety risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 11, 2021

Plan of correction: Administrator stated that they will provide documentation of R3 and R4's current physicians reports to CCL by 8/20/21.

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR87458(b)(1) · Plan of correction due date: Aug 20, 2021

87458 Medical Assessment. (b)(1) A physical examination of the resident indicating the physician's primary diagnosis and secondary diagnosis, if any and results of an examination for communicable tuberculosis, other contagious/infectious diseases or other medical conditions… This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in 3 out of 6 resident records which poses a potential health and safety risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 11, 2021

Plan of correction: Administrator stated that they will provide documentation of R1, R2 and R3's TB tests to CCL by 8/20/21.

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: HSC 1569.625(b)(1) · Plan of correction due date: Aug 20, 2021

1569.625 Staff training; legislative findings; contents (b)(1) The department shall adopt regulations to require staff members of residential care facilities for the elderly who assist residents with personal activities of daily living to receive appropriate training. This training shall consist of 40 hours of training... This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in 2 out of 6 staff records which poses a potential health and safety risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 11, 2021

Plan of correction: Administrator stated that they will provide documentation of S1 and S2's 40 hours initial training to CCL by 8/20/21.

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR87411(c)(1) · Plan of correction due date: Aug 18, 2021

87411 Personnel Requirements – General (c)(1) Staff providing care shall receive appropriate training in first aid from persons qualified by such agencies as the American Red Cross. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in 3 out of 6 staff records which poses a potential health and safety risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 11, 2021

Plan of correction: Administrator stated that they will provide documentation of S1, S2 and S3's current first aid certificates to CCL by 8/18/21.

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87411(f) · Plan of correction due date: Aug 18, 2021

87411 Personnel Requirements – General (f) All personnel, including the licensee and administrator, shall be in good health… Good physical health shall be verified by a health screening, including a chest x-ray or an intradermal test, performed by a physician not more than six (6) months prior to… This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in 1 out of 6 staff records which poses a potential health and safety risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 11, 2021

Plan of correction: Administrator stated that they will provide documentation of S4's health screening to CCL by 8/18/21.

Jul 14, 2021Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Resident's personal rights were violated Resident was transported in an unsafe manner and/or vehicle

During today's visit Licensing Program Analysts (LPA's) JoAnn Rosales and KaSandra Lopez toured the facility with Administrator, reviewed random resident records, interviewed random staff and obtained copies of pertinent documents. Concerns were that resident #1 (R1)'s rights were violated as housekeeping staff threw away R1's AARP bulletins. Interview with staff (S1) starting at 10:53 am revealed that S2 removed R1's AARP magazines from their room and placed them on their housekeeping cart to throw out. Interview with S2 starting at 11:44 am revealed that they removed a newspaper and magazines from R1's room as they thought that R1 did not need them anymore and placed them on their housekeeping cart. Concerns were that R1 was transported in an unsafe manner and/or vehicle as R1 was transported in S1's personal vehicle for an appointment. Interview with Administrator at 5:12 pm revealed that they did not do a car safety inspection and only confirmed verbally that S1 had current car insurance prior to S1 transporting R1 to their appointment. Continued on 9099C Substantiated Interview with S1 revealed that they transported R1 in their personal vehicle to an appointment. S1 stated that the Administrator did not request a copy of their current automobile insurance information and they were not required to do any safety checks on the vehicle prior to transporting R1 to their appointment. Starting at 11:35 am LPA's observed S1's vehicle with working blinkers, hazards, brake lights, horn and headlights. LPA's observed a crack on the passenger side windshield. S1 stated that the crack on the windshield happened on 7/10/21. LPA's observed current automobile insurance information for S1's vehicle. Based on the information obtained during the course of the investigation the allegations are deemed substantiated at this time. Exit interview conducted. Today's reports and appeal rights were reviewed and emailed to Administrator. lock from R1's bathroom door however, R1's responsible person stated that R1 would not have privacy so Licensee/representative placed the lock back on the bathroom door. Licensee/representative stated that the lock is a toggle lock and can be locked and unlocked from both sides of the door. During Interview with R1 at 12:19 pm R1 pointed out the lock on their bathroom door indicating that the door was locked. LPA's observed R1's bathroom door to be unlocked. R1 stated that sometimes the door is locked sometimes it is not locked. Interview with S2 and S3 starting at 11:56 am revealed that they were unaware of R1's bathroom door being locked and R1 not having access to the bathroom. Based on the information obtained during the course of the investigation the allegations are deemed unsubstantiated at this time. Exit interview conducted. Today's reports and appeal rights were reviewed and emailed to Administrator.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 14, 2021 · control 29-NP-20210709071914

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 1569.269(a)(30) · Plan of correction due date: Jul 23, 2021

1569.269 Enumerated rights; severability (a)(30) To keep, have access to, and use their own personal possessions, including toilet articles, and to keep and be allowed to spend their own money, unless limited by statute or regulation. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above as staff removed R1’s personal items from their room which poses a potential personal rights risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 14, 2021

Plan of correction: Administrator stated that they will provide documentation of staff training regarding residents rights to CCL by 7/23/21.

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87312 · Plan of correction due date: Jul 23, 2021

87312 Motor Vehicles Used in Transporting Residents. Only drivers licensed for the type of vehicle operated shall be permitted to transport residents. The rated seating capacity... Any vehicle used by the facility to transport residents shall be maintained in a safe operating condition. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above as licensee did not verify that S1's vehicle was maintained in a safe operating condition prior to transporting R1 which posed a potential safety and personal rights risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 14, 2021

Plan of correction: Administrator stated that they will no longer being using staff to transport residents in their private vehicles as they have a contract with a medical transport company.

The state marks this report as 6 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 5. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.

Jul 14, 2021Facility evaluation reportCase Management - DeficienciesDeficiency page: Type A

Type of visit: Case Management - Deficiencies

Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) JoAnn Rosales and KaSandra Lopez conducted an unannounced Case Management - Deficiencies inspection at the facility today due to a violation observed during the investigation of complaint control #29-NP-20210709071914. At 10:32 AM the LPAs observed the following items accessible to residents in an unlocked storage closet: Milk of Magnesia, Miralax, fleet enemas, poly grip, and toothpaste. The facility has residents residing in the facility with a diagnosis of dementia. The door was locked during the inspection. Pursuant to Title 22 Division 6 Chapter 8 of the CA Code of Regulations, the following deficiency was cited (refer to LIC 809-D): Exit interview conducted, todays reports and appeal rights were reviewed and emailed to the Administrator.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 14, 2021

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87705(f)(2) · Plan of correction due date: Jul 14, 2021

87705 Care of Persons with Dementia (f) The following shall be stored inaccessible to residents with dementia: (2) Over-the-counter medication,...and toxic substances.... This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on observation, the licensee failed to comply with the citation above as there are residents with a dementia diagnosis and over the counter medications and hygiene supplies were being stored in an unlocked storage closet which poses an immediate health risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 14, 2021

Plan of correction: Staff locked the door and secured the items during the inspection. Plan of correction is cleared.

Jul 14, 2021Facility evaluation reportCase Management - IncidentReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Incident

Licensing Program Analyst (LPAs) JoAnn Rosales and KaSandra Lopez conducted an unannounced Case Management - Incident inspection at the facility due to receiving information of an incident during the investigation of complaint control #29-NP-20210709071914. At 12:19 pm LPA Rosales was conducting an interview with resident #1 (R1) regarding the complaint investigation. During the interview, R1 stated about a week and a half or two ago three or four males of which some were African American grabbed R1 out of bed and threw them to their bedroom floor. R1 stated that they wanted to report this to law enforcement. Upon receiving this information, LPA Rosales notified the Administrator and requested that they call law enforcement. The LPA also requested the Administrator to complete an Incident Report and the Report of Suspected Dependent Elder Abuse form (SOC341) and cross report. At approximately 1:00 pm a review of R1's file was conducted and pertinent copies of records were obtained. During the inspection Law enforcement came to the facility and interviewed R1. At 2:07 pm the LPAs met with two law enforcement officers who stated that after interviewing R1 they would not be conducting any further investigation. LPA Rosales obtained the police report number from the investigation. Interviews with the Administrator revealed that they were not aware of this alleged incident reported by R1. The Administrator also stated that there is only one male staff working at the facility during the night shift and there are no African American staff or residents residing in the facility. At 2:27 pm the LPAs attempted to interview R2 who is the roommate of R1. Due to their medical condition, the LPAs were unable to conduct an interview with R2. At 2:31 pm the LPAs conducted an interview with R3 who resides in the room next to R1. R3 reported no issues or concerns of unwanted individuals coming into Continued on 809C their room or any reports of being abused. At 2:43 pm an interview conducted with R4 revealed no issues or no unwanted individuals coming into their room or any reports of being abused. At 2:53 pm an interview with R5 revealed no issues of concerns regarding how they are being treated at the facility. At 4:17 pm LPA Rosales conducted a telephone interview with staff #1 (S1) who works the overnight shift. S1 denied ever pulling any residents out of bed and throwing them on the ground. S1 stated that they are the only male staff who works at night. S1 reported no incidents of outside individuals coming into the facility and assaulting any residents. The facility is approved for delayed egress and secured perimeter of which individuals cannot enter the building or exit the building without staff unlocking the doors and granting entry/exiting. Based on the information obtained during the investigation there is insufficient evidence at this time to support R1 was physically abused at the facility. Exit interview was conducted, today's report was reviewed and emailed to the Administrator.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 14, 2021
Jul 8, 2021Facility evaluation reportOfficeReport on file

Type of visit: Office

A virtual Office Meeting was conducted to discuss concerns that were brought to our attention regarding the change in ownership from Treacy Villa #561703345. Present at today’s meeting were: Jill Nakata Regional Manager (RM), Kristin Heffernan Licensing Program Manager (LPM), JoAnn Rosales Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Evangeline "Joy" Ward-Michayluk Administrator and Craig Michayluk Licensee/Representative. RM discussed staffing and communication with residents and their responsible persons and making sure that what is being communicated is cohesive. RM requested Administrator to submitted a current LIC500 Personnel Record. LPM discussed the visitation policy suggesting that they follow the Provider Information Notice (PIN) 21-17.2-ASC dated 5/14/21. Licensee/Representative agreed to follow the Provider Information Notices including revising their visitation policies. LPA to provide a copy of PIN 21-17.2-ASC to Administrator and Licensee/Representative. LPM discussed Health and Safety Code 1569.655 regarding any rates increases for residents. Licensee/Representative agreed to follow Health and Safety Code 1569.655 and provide residents and/or their responsible party a written 60 day notice. LPA to provide a copy of Health and Safety Code to Administrator and Licensee/Representative. LPM discussed changes in residents Pharmacies, Physical Therapists, Home Health, Hospice any other Providers. Licensee/Representative agreed to notify residents and their responsible persons prior to making any changes in residents Providers. LPM discussed the facility's transportation policy. Administrator stated that they have made arrangements with a 3rd party transportation company to provide transportation for residents. LPM discussed exceptions and waivers that will need to be submitted under the new license. Exit interview conducted, today's report was reviewed and emailed to the Administrator and Licensee/Representative.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 8, 2021

13 of 49 beds were occupied at the June 16, 2026 state visit — a count on that day, not an opening.

License holder

Healthy Senior Care Partners, licensed since 2021.

The state’s totals for this licenseSince 2021, as the state’s facility page counts them
State visits on file
26
Total complaints
8
Substantiated allegations
10
Type A citations
3
Type B citations
4

These are the state’s own totals for this license since 2021, per CDSS records. The state counts them apart from the documents above, and they can differ from what those documents show; the documents say what each visit found. One complaint can contain several allegations.

Compare with homes the same size
This homeTypical
Type A citations30
Type B citations41
Substantiated allegations102
Total complaints86

“Typical” is the statewide median for licensed homes this size. It does not adjust for years licensed, and older licenses have had more visits and reports. The median is across the 1,354 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record. The figures compared are the state’s totals, not the documents.

What the state’s words mean
Routine visita visit the state records as “Required” — a scheduled visit, not one made in answer to a complaintSubstantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedthere was not enough evidence to prove a violation occurred — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe evidence showed the allegation was false, could not have happened, or had no reasonable basisType A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗

An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents stand in their place.

Open CDSS facility search ↗Report a record errorOperate this home? Respond or correct, free →
Frequently asked questions

A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

Quick answers about Ventura Villa Assisted Living

Is Ventura Villa Assisted Living licensed?

The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.

How many residents is Ventura Villa Assisted Living licensed for?

49 residents — a mid-size home, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.

Has Ventura Villa Assisted Living been cited?

3 Type A and 4 Type B citations since 2021, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. Those records count 26 state visits over the same years.

Is Ventura Villa Assisted Living still open?

This license was on the CDSS roster as of November 11, 2026.

What does Ventura Villa Assisted Living cost?

$3,750 a month to start — listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026.

The home lists this starting rate on Seniorly for assisted living shared bedroom, seen September 9, 2026.

Among 20 other homes of a similar licensed size across Ventura County that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $4,000 to $6,500 a month, and the middle figure is $5,850 (n = 20 other homes publishing a starting rate).

Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date between September and October 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.

A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.

The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.

A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.

Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.

Does Ventura Villa Assisted Living take Medi-Cal?

On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated October 1, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.

Who holds the license?

The license is held by Healthy Senior Care Partners, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.

Is there a hospital nearby?

Ventura County Medical Center is 0.3 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.

Can Ventura Villa Assisted Living keep a resident on hospice?

Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 27 residents, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.

Ventura Villa Assisted Living license and inspection record

  • Name on the license: “VENTURA VILLA ASSISTED LIVING”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
  • License #565850093. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
  • Licensed for 49 residents — a mid-size home, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
  • Licensed to Healthy Senior Care Partners, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
  • First licensed in 2021, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
  • 26 state inspection visits since 2021, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
  • 3 Type A and 4 Type B citations on file since 2021, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. The same records count 26 state visits in that period.
  • 8 complaints and 10 substantiated allegations on file since 2021, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
  • The most recent state visit on file is September 2, 2026, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Type A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗

See the state’s own record

Nearby

Other homes nearby

Licensed homes near this one in Ventura County, most information on file first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.

  • Map

    Ventura · 1.1 mi

    Ventura Townehouse

    Large community · licensed for 566

    Starting rate

    $5,495 a month to start

    Listed by the home on its own website · October 5, 2026

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record
    • Hospice: on the state record
    • Bedridden: on the state record
  • Map

    Ventura · 1.0 mi

    Finest Living at Arcade

    Small home · licensed for 6

    Starting rate

    $3,210 a month to start

    Listed by the home on A Place for Mom · September 9, 2026

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record
    • Hospice: on the state record
  • Map

    Ventura · 0.9 mi

    The Residence at Dean

    Small home · licensed for 4

    Estimated starting rate

    $4,650 a month to start

    Covelight estimate · likely $3,800–$5,700

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record
    • Dementia: on the state record
    • Hospice: on the state record
  • Map

    Ventura · 0.9 mi

    The Butterfly Inn

    Small home · licensed for 6

    Estimated starting rate

    $4,700 a month to start

    Covelight estimate · likely $3,850–$5,800

    On the state record

    • Hospice: on the state record
    • Bedridden: on the state record
  • Map

    Ventura · 0.7 mi

    Navita Residences Ashwood

    Small home · licensed for 6

    Estimated starting rate

    $4,800 a month to start

    Covelight estimate · likely $3,900–$5,900

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record
    • Hospice: on the state record
    • Bedridden: on the state record
  • Map

    Ventura · 1.0 mi

    The Varsity Manor

    Small home · licensed for 6

    Estimated starting rate

    $4,850 a month to start

    Covelight estimate · likely $3,950–$5,950

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record
    • Dementia: on the state record
    • Hospice: on the state record
    • Bedridden: on the state record

Street maps © Protomaps · © OpenStreetMap

Explore Ventura County ↗

Do you run this home?

Add your photos, care details, and contact information. Your public profile is free.

Claim this home
Visiting in person? Print a visit sheetHow we source information
CallAsk this home
VV

Call Ventura Villa Assisted Living

Ventura · Licensed for 49

(805) 644-1292

From the state licensing record · October 26, 2026

From the home’s website, venturavillaliving.com:

venturavillaliving@yahoo.com · general email · seen October 5, 2026

or

Let us do the legwork

  • We ask about availability, price and the care you describe.
  • If it’s a fit, you choose whether they call you. Either way, you get every answer.
Check availabilityFree

Ask Ventura Villa Assisted Living

Check availability

Request a tour

More days
  • AskThe cost, or your own question

Free for families. A home gets your number only if you say yes.

Covelight Care

A free directory of every licensed care home in California, built from CDSS public records.

Find your next step

Find a homeSaved homesHelp me chooseCheck a home

Make sense of care

Care guidesMedi-Cal & careYour rightsHow we workAbout this site

Work with Covelight

For professionalsFor home operatorsSuggest a correctionDevelopersContact us

© 2026 Covelight Care LLC. Homes never pay to appear or rank higher.

Covelight Care is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the sources named on this page.

3104 O St Unit #1023, Sacramento, CA 95816

PrivacyTermsText messages