Illustration — no photo of this home on file yet

Rose Garden Manor III

Small home·Licensed for 6·Oxnard, California

Licensed since 2004Licence #565801182
  • Care approvals on fileWheelchairState licensing record · September 27, 2026
  • Estimated starting rate$4,100 a monthCovelight estimate · likely $3,350–$5,050
  • Home sizeLicensed for 6Small care home · a licensed care home (RCFE)
  • Room at the last state visit5 of 6 beds occupiedAugust 1, 2024 · not a current opening
  • Ways to payAsk the homeMedi-Cal ALW participation not on file
  • Last state visitDecember 10, 2025CDSS inspection record
  • Licence holderSoratorio, AmaliaSince 2004 · 2 licensed homes

Rose Garden Manor III is a small care home in Oxnard — a licensed residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE), the licence category behind “assisted living” and “board and care.” It is licensed for 6 residents since 2004. Dementia care, hospice care and bedridden care are not on file.

Built from CDSS public records · September 27, 2026. Every fact below names its source and date.

Quick answers and the state record

A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

Quick answers about Rose Garden Manor III

Is Rose Garden Manor III licensed?

The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

How many residents is Rose Garden Manor III licensed for?

6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Has Rose Garden Manor III been cited?

0 Type A and 0 Type B citations since 2004, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. Those records count 5 state visits over the same years.

Is Rose Garden Manor III still open?

This license was on the CDSS roster as of September 28, 2026.

What does Rose Garden Manor III cost?

$4,100 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $3,350–$5,050. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 12 small homes and similar homes within 10 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

Among 17 other homes of a similar licensed size across Ventura County that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $3,500 to $6,202 a month, and the middle figure is $5,000 (n = 17 other homes publishing a starting rate).

Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.

A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.

The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.

A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.

Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.

Does Rose Garden Manor III take Medi-Cal?

On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.

Who holds the license?

The license is held by Soratorio, Amalia, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Is there a hospital nearby?

St Johns Regional Medical Center is 3.9 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.

Can Rose Garden Manor III keep a resident on hospice?

Not on file — the state’s record does not list hospice care on this license. Ask: “Can a resident stay here on hospice, and under what conditions?”

Rose Garden Manor III license and inspection record

  • Name on the license: “ROSE GARDEN MANOR III”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
  • License #565801182. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • Licensed for 6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • Licensed to Soratorio, Amalia, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • First licensed in 2004, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • 5 state inspection visits since 2004, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • 0 Type A and 0 Type B citations on file since 2004, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. The same records count 5 state visits in that period.
  • 1 complaint and 0 substantiated allegations on file since 2004, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
  • The most recent state visit on file is December 10, 2025, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
Type A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗

See the state’s own record

Can they support the care needed?

California licenses a home for specific kinds of care. The state’s record lists what this home is approved for; the home’s own answers fill in what changes as needs change.

  • Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved · covers up to 4 residents
  • Dementia / memory careNot on file · ask the home
  • Hospice careNot on file · ask the home
  • BedriddenNot on file · ask the home

State licensing record · September 27, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.

Read the state’s own wording
4 NON-AMBULATORY IN ROOMS #1 AND #2.

935 - ELDERLY

CDSS record, verbatim · September 27, 2026

As needs change

5 questions to ask the home — nothing on file yet
  • Two-person transfers or a lift

    Not on file

    Ask: “If two people or a lift are needed to transfer, can the person stay?”

  • Someone awake overnight

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?”

  • Medicines

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who manages the medicines, and what happens when a dose is missed?”

  • Staying through hospice

    Hospice waiver not on file

    Ask: “If hospice is needed, can care continue here until the end?”

  • If memory loss develops

    Dementia-care designation not on file

    Ask: “If memory loss develops, what would change — and when would a move be needed?”

What it costs here

Covelight estimate

$4,100a month to start

Likely $3,350–$5,050

From 12 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file

Likely monthly total

$4,100a month

Likely $3,350–$5,250

With a shared room and basic help.

An estimate for planning, not a quote. The price is made in the phone call.

See the full cost breakdownRoom, care and fees · how people pay · how this estimate works
Room
Daily care
Sharing the room

Memory care is not priced here: a dementia-care designation is not on file for this home. Ask the home.

  • Starting monthly rate$4,100likely $3,350–$5,050

    Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 12 small homes and similar homes within 10 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

  • Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600

    Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (45 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).

  • One-time move-in fee$2,000one time · likely $0–$4,000

    Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,000 (134 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.

Likely monthly totalLikely $3,350–$5,250
$4,100
First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $3,950–$8,400
$6,100
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
  • Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
  • Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
  • SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
  • VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
  • Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
  • MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
If the money runs out, what Medi-Cal covers
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
  • The care level

    Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.

  • What is billed separately

    Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.

  • Move-in costs

    A one-time community fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.

  • Increases

    California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.

  • What is the full monthly cost for the room and care we need, and what does it include?
  • What would the next care level cost, and who decides when it changes?
  • What is billed separately, and is there a one-time fee or deposit at move-in?
  • Is any private-pay period required before another payment program can begin?
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 12 small homes and similar homes within 10 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

12 homes like this within 10 miles publish starting rates mostly between $3,250–$6,150.

  • Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
  • Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
  • Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
  • Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
  • We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
  • It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Show the 12 nearby homes behind this estimate

Where it is

  • 831 Yale Place, Oxnard, CA 93033Address from the public record · September 27, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.

Opening the neighborhood map…

The state record

California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. Here are the dated documents and the state’s own words, beside what is typical for homes this size.

Since 2022, the state has filed 5 documents for this home, and its records count 5 visits since 2004. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated December 10, 2025.

On file since
2022
State visits
5
Most recent visit
December 10, 2025
Occupied · August 1, 2024 visit
5 of 6 bedsa count on that day, not an opening

We hold 1 complaint report the state published for this home, dated August 1, 2024. 1 of the 1 carries the state's recorded outcome word: “Unsubstantiated” (1). 1 includes the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word. Summary composed by computer from the 1 complaint report below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

Beside homes the same size

  • Type A citations0typical 0
  • Type B citations0typical 0
  • Substantiated allegations0typical 0
  • Total complaints1typical 0

“Typical” is the statewide median across the 6,808 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this licence since 2004.

Year by year
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated2025110202422020231102022110

The last 36 months — 4 of 5 documents

20251 state visit · 1 document
Dec 10, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Emily Peraldi arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct a required annual visit. At 10:20 a.m., the LPA arrived at the facility and called Licensee, Amalia Soratorio and explained the reason for the visit. At 10:30 a.m., staff allowed LPA entrance. At 10:40 a.m., the Licensee, Amalia Soratorio arrived at the facility. At 11:00 a.m., Administrator,Emmanuel Soratorio arrived at the facility. RECORD REVIEW: Between 10:38 a.m. and 11:52 a.m., the LPA conducted a file review for all five (5) residents. Resident records were reviewed for but not limited to: Individual Program Plan (IPP), medical records, admissions agreement, quarterly reports and consent forms. All files were in order. Due to time constraints the LPA will return at a later date to complete the annual. Exit interview conducted. A copy of the report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 10, 2025
20242 state visits · 2 documents
Dec 19, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Melisa Rankin conducted an unannounced Required - 1 Year Inspection. The facility is vendored by Tri-Counties Regional Center as a level 4-E home. LPA met with Licensee Amalia Soratorio and explained the reason for the visit. The residents were at day program during today’s visit. At 9:50 a.m. the LPA conducted a tour of the physical plant with the Licensee to ensure there are no health and safety hazards and facility is in compliance with Title 22 Regulations. The following was noted: Facility is a single-story residence that consists of two (2) living rooms, five (5) resident bedrooms, and two (2) restrooms. The LPA observed two (2) fire extinguishers which were fully charged and last serviced 10/04/2024. At 10:10 a.m. all smoke alarms and carbon monoxide detectors were tested and functioned properly. The LPA observed all required postings throughout the home. Kitchen: During the facility tour at 10:15 a.m. the kitchen appeared clean and the appliances and fixtures functional. LPA observed a sufficient amount of perishable and non-perishable food at the facility. Snacks and beverages are always available for the residents. Bedrooms: The resident bedrooms were properly furnished with at least one chair, nightstand and sufficient lighting for each resident. The bedrooms had appropriate and adequate bedding and linens such as sheets, pillowcases, mattress pads, and blankets. Restrooms: The client restrooms were observed to be clean, sanitary and fixtures were in operating condition. At 10:00 a.m., the hot water in the common hallway bathroom was tested and is within regulation temperatures. Report will continue on LIC809-C. Common areas: These included the living rooms and dining area. The common areas were checked for cleanliness and furniture was checked for functionality. There is a fireplace in the second living room, which is covered with a screen. The facility maintained a comfortable temperature of 67 degrees. There were no obstructions and/or tripping hazards throughout the facility. Garage: The LPA observed the garage, where the washer and dryer are held, and the emergency water is stored. Cleaning supplies and disinfectants are kept in locked cabinets in the garage. Surrounding Grounds (Outdoors): The LPA observed appropriate outdoor furniture, with a covered shaded area for residents. There are no bodies of water on the premises. Infection Control: The home has an adequate supply of Personal Protection Equipment (PPE) and can obtain additional supplies. The home’s policies and procedures pertaining to infection control were adequate. Record Review: The LPA reviewed resident and staff records starting at 09:30 a.m. and started again at 10:30 a.m. The LPA reviewed all five resident files for, but not limited to, the following: signed admission agreements, current medical assessments with TB results, consent forms, and current needs and services plan. All files were complete. The LPA reviewed five (5) staff files for, but not limited to, the following: personnel records, health screening, criminal record statements, current first aid/CPR cards. All files were complete. The LPA observed documentation of Disaster prevention and quarterly fire emergency drills. Guidance for some updates to the disaster plan was provided. The LPA obtained a Client Roster, Staff Roster, and copy of Insurance liability. Medications: At 11:20 a.m. a medication review was initiated. Medications are centrally stored and locked in a hallway closet; medications are labeled and checked for expiration dates. Medications are properly documented on the centrally stored medications and destruction record. Exit interview conducted and copy of the report provided to Licensee.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 19, 2024

The state marks this report as 5 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 2. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.

Aug 1, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff are not adequately trained Staff falsified resident records Staff are not fingerprint cleared Residents are being financially abused by the licensee

At 11:35 a.m. Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Esther Cortez along with Tri-Counties Regional Center Quality Assurance Specialist (QAS) Ryan Landseadel conducted an unannounced initial 10-day complaint visit for the above allegations. Upn arrival the LPA and QAS met with administrator Amalia Soratorio. There were no clients present. Administrator Emmanuel Soratorio arrived during the visit and all clients arrived during the visit at 1:30 p.m. During today's inspection, between 11:35 a.m. and 3:00 p.m., the LPA interviewed the Administrators, two (2) staff, one (1) client, conducted a file review, and obtained copies of records and other pertinent documents relevant to the investigation. On the allegation that Staff are not adequately trained, it is the reporting party’s concern that staff are working without being trained. Report will continue on LI809-C. Unsubstantiated To investigate the allegation, the LPA conducted staff record review, and interviewed staff and the administrators. The record review revealed that all staff received the required training and continue to receive on going training. Interview with administrator Emmanuel revealed that the staff receives orientation training, continuation on-site training, CPI training, medication training and Direct Support Professional Training. Staff interviews revealed that they received training in Direct Support Professional training and on-site training. Based on interviews and record review the allegation above is deemed unsubstantiated at this time. On the allegation that Staff are not fingerprint cleared, it is the concern of the reporting party that staff without background clearance are working at the facility. To investigate the allegation, the LPA requested all staff’s records for the staff reflected on the LIC500 (Personnel Roster). The LPA reviewed records and the reviewed records revealed that all staff members were background cleared and are associated with this facility. Staff interviews confirmed there are no other adults who work at the facility other than those on the staff schedule. Based on interviews and record review the above allegation above is deemed unsubstantiated at this time. On the allegation that Staff falsified resident records and Residents are being financially abused by the licensee; it is the concern of the reporting party that the Licensee had Staff help in making false documents including receipts for personal purchases being shown as client purchases. To investigate the allegation, the LPA conducted a record review of the clients record of client’s/resident’s safeguard cash resource (LIC 405) for the three clients that the facility safeguards their cash resources for, and conducted interviews. The LPA observed all LIC 405 forms properly documented with each transaction dated, signed by the client, correct amounts and balances, and descriptions documented. The LPA observed supporting receipts that matched the LIC 405 transactions. Administrator Emmanuel conducted an audit of the clients cash in front of the LPA, all amounts and balances matched. Staff interviews revealed that staff buys items the clients ask for during outings and send the receipt to Administrator Amalia. All staff interviewed denied spending clients money or falsifying any records. Client interview revealed that staff helps them buy items they want, and that they are happy at the facility. Based on information gathered, the Department does not have sufficient evidence to determine Staff falsified resident records and Residents are being financially abused by the licensee. Therefore, the above allegation is deemed unsubstantiated at this time. No citations were issued. Exit interview conducted. A copy of the report was provided to administrator Emmanuel Soratorio.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 1, 2024 · control 29-AS-20240726165711
20231 state visit · 1 document
Dec 7, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Esther Cortez conducted an unannounced Required - 1 Year Inspection. The facility is vendored by Tri-Counties Regional Center as a level 4-E home. When the LPA arrived there was nobody at the home, the LPA contacted Licensee Amalia Soratorio who arrived at 10:11 a.m. and explained to them the reason for the visit. The residents were at day program during todays visit and all arrived at 1:23 p.m. At 10:34 a.m. the LPA conducted a tour of the physical plant with the Licensee to ensure there are no health and safety hazards and facility is in compliance with Title 22 Regulations. The following was noted: Facility is a single-story residence that consists of two (2) living rooms, five (5) resident bedrooms, one (1) staff room, and two (2) restrooms. The LPA observed two (2) fire extinguishers which were fully charged and last serviced 10/05/2023. At 10:41 a.m. all smoke alarms and carbon monoxide detectors were tested and functioned properly. The LPA observed all required postings through out the home. Kitchen: During the facility tour at 10:34 a.m. the kitchen appeared clean and the appliances and fixtures functional. LPA observed a sufficient amount of perishable and non-perishable food at the facility. Food is prepared based on the menu. Snacks and beverages are always available for the residents. Bedrooms: The resident bedrooms were properly furnished with at least one chair, nightstand and sufficient lighting for each resident. The bedrooms had appropriate and adequate bedding and linens such as sheets, pillowcases, mattress pads, and blankets. Restrooms: The client restrooms were observed to be clean, sanitary and fixtures were in operating condition. At 10:44 a.m., the hot water in the common hallway bathroom measured at 112.6 degrees Fahrenheit. Report will continue on LIC809-C. Common areas: These included the living rooms and dining area. The common areas were checked for cleanliness and furniture was checked for functionality. There is a fireplace in the second living room, which is covered with a screen. The facility maintained a comfortable temperature of 67 degrees. There were no obstructions and/or tripping hazards throughout the facility. Garage: The LPA observed the garage, where the washer and dryer are held, and the emergency water is stored. Cleaning supplies and disinfectants are kept in locked cabinets in the garage. The garage is not locked. Surrounding Grounds (Outdoors): The LPA observed appropriate outdoor furniture, with a covered shaded area for residents. There are no bodies of water on the premises. Infection Control: The home has an adequate supply of Personal Protection Equipment (PPE) and can obtain additional supplies. The home’s policies and procedures pertaining to infection control were adequate. Record Review: The LPA reviewed resident and staff records at 11:24 a.m. The LPA reviewed all five resident files for, but not limited to, the following: signed admission agreements, current medical assessments with TB results, consent forms, and current needs and services plan. All files were complete. Five (5) out of ten (10) staff files were reviewed. The LPA reviewed five staff files for, but not limited to, the following: personnel records, health screening, criminal record statements, current first aid/CPR cards. All files were complete. The LPA observed documentation of Infection Control, Disaster prevention and last fire drill (conducted on 11/30/2023). The LPA obtained a Client Roster, Staff Roster, and copy of Insurance liability. Medications: At 02:11 p.m. a medication review was initiated. Medications are centrally stored and locked in a hallway closet; medications are labeled and checked for expiration dates. Medications are properly documented on the centrally stored medications and destruction record. The LPA inspected the first aid kit, which was complete with a first aid manual. Interviews: At 02:42 p.m. the LPA conducted two (2) staff and two(2) resident Interviews. No immediate concerns were voiced. Exit interview conducted and copy of the report provided to Licensee Amalia.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 7, 2023
What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedthere was not enough evidence to prove a violation occurred — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe evidence showed the allegation was false, could not have happened, or had no reasonable basisType A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗

An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents and the questions below stand in their place.

Who holds the licence

Soratorio, Amalia, licensed since 2004, operates 2 licensed homes in California. Running more than one home is common and is neither good nor bad on its own.

Life here

Rooms, meals, the rhythm of a day, faith and language, pets and house rules — as the home describes them. Tap any detail for its source and date; nothing here is graded.

The home has not described daily life anywhere we have reviewed yet — that is the case for most small homes, and it says nothing about the home. These questions fill in the picture; keep the ones that matter to you.

Before you call

Ask every home the same questions — the state’s record does not answer these. Keep the ones that matter and they travel with your saved homes.

  1. What is included in the monthly rate, and what costs extra?
  2. Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?
  3. Which rooms does the non-ambulatory approval cover, and what transfer support is provided?
  4. What could change whether someone can stay here?
  5. Can we see a bedroom and share a meal during a visit?

Other homes nearby

The nearest licensed homes in Ventura County, closest first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.

Explore Ventura County